View
224
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
1/23
Three Simple Steps to
Investment Success
Landon Loveall
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
2/23
2
Why Does It Matter How I Invest My Money?
Individuals today face far greater challenges with regard to managing their money and preparing for the
future than at any time before. We all recognize this, but it is important to acknowledge the facts as we
discuss the importance of the day-to-day decisions we make regarding our money.
The first challenge individuals face is the change in retirement planning for the individual worker. The
first US private sector pension plan was introduced in 1875 by a railroad freight forwarder, the American
Express Company. Events during the first half of the twentieth century such as the Great Depression
and the end of World War II fueled the growth of the defined benefit pension plan.1 Chances are that
this is the type of retirement plan that your parents or grandparents are benefactors of.
In 1985, the number of single employer pension plans insured by the Pension Benefits Guaranty
Corporation (PBGC) peaked at 112,000. By 2009, the number of plans insured by the PBGC had declined
to 27,650.2
Just as traditional pension plans have decreased since the 1980s, other retirement plans, which placegreater emphasis on contributions from individual participants, have increased. By 2002, both IRA and
Keogh plans (2.3 trillion) and private defined contribution plans (1.9 trillion) exceeded private defined
benefit plans (1.6 trillion), which had led the market at 0.8 trillion dollars in 1985, as a source of
retirement assets.3
The increased independence of the individual is mirrored in areas other than retirement planning.
Among companies offering employer sponsored health care coverage, average worker contributions
increased by 147% from 2000 ($4,819) to 2010 ($9,773). Also, the percentage of covered workers in a
plan with a deductible of at least $1,000 increased from 22% in 2009 to 27% in 2010.4
We Are on Our Own.
The trends in both retirement planning and health care coverage reflect what we have all observed over
the last few years increasingly, we are on our own.
Anya Kamenetz, author ofGeneration Debt, perhaps put this best when she said, Guarantees that over
the past century were provided by employers and the government are being withdrawn. The only way
for us to manage this new raft of risks is to plan better than anyone has ever planned before.5
1Stephen P. McCourt, Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans: A History, Market Overview and
Comparative Analysis, Benefits & Compensation Digest, 43, no. 2 (2006): 1-2, accessed September 28, 2011,
http://www.ifebp.org/PDF/webexclusive/feb06.pdf.2Pension Insurance Data Book 2009 (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 2010), 25.
3Stephen P. McCourt, Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans: A History, Market Overview and
Comparative Analysis, Benefits & Compensation Digest, 43, no. 2 (2006): 2, accessed September 28, 2011,
http://www.ifebp.org/PDF/webexclusive/feb06.pdf.4Employer Health Benefits 2010 Summary of Findings (The Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research &
Educational Trust, 2010), 1-2.5
Anya Kamenetz, Generation Debt, (New York: Riverhead Books, 2007), 129.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
3/23
3
Our quest to plan better than anyone has ever planned before is made more difficult by much of the
financial services industry or by what is found in the popular press. Like a ship tossed upon the sea,
individuals are bombarded by advice that is focused on getting rich quickly and on what to buy or sell
now rather than planning for the long-term.
We must first understand what is important in our efforts to build wealth and plan for the future beforewe can begin to take the necessary steps to do so.
What Is Important?
The factors that drive wealth building are not the specific mutual funds you purchase or your ability to
identify the next Google. Wealth building is driven by three factors:
1. How Much You Earn2. How Much You Save3. How Much You Keep
How Much You Earn
How much you earn is a measure of your ability to go out into the world and earn a living. Just as a
business cannot survive without earnings, your ability to earn an income is the first driver to wealth
building. Also, the higher your income is the greater your potential for savings.
How Much You Save
The individual household functions much like a business. Savings is the profit the household produces.
This is a measure of your ability to efficiently manage your household and keep expenses at a level
below income. Our starting point, which we will discuss in more detail later, is to save 10% of annual
income. We also fund our future first by avoiding consumer and credit card debt.
How Much You Keep
The third factor that drives wealth building is how much you keep. How much you keep is determined
by the amount you pay in taxes and expense fees. We manage taxes by utilizing tax deferred savings
opportunities. We avoid paying excess fees by choosing low cost products.
Asset Allocation
Besides the three factors that drive wealth building, the majority of your investment performance will
be determined by asset allocation. A study by Roger G. Ibbotson and Paul D. Kaplan published in the
Financial Analysts Journalfound that 90% of the variability of a funds (mutual fund or pension fund)
return over time could be explained by asset allocation.6 This is where we will focus our attention for
the remainder of this guide.
6Roger G. Ibbotson and Paul D. Kaplan, Does Asset Allocation Policy Explain 40, 90, or 100 Percent of
Performance, Financial Analysts Journal, January/February (2000): 32.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
4/23
4
I referenced earlier the barrage of bad advice and confusion facing individual investors. Asset allocation
is no different. Depending on how you count, Morningstar, a popular investment research website,
breaks mutual funds into more than 20 categories. The overly specific organization of mutual funds by
type, size, region, etc., is unnecessary.
In an effort to help us obtain a sense of clarity, we will consider only two asset categories: interestearning and equities.
Interest Earning
Interest earning assets take the form of cash accounts, CDs, bonds, mortgage equivalents, etc. An easy
way to think about this is, with interest earning assets, you are a loaner. For example, you lend the bank
the use of your funds through cash accounts or CDs. You lend the government or corporation money
through bonds, and you receive interest in return.
Equities
Equities take the form of stock, commodities, closely held businesses, etc. With equities, you are an
owner. Instead of simply loaning your money (interest earning) to the corporation, you receive an
ownership position by purchasing stock. Your expectation through equities is to receive a portion of the
profits through dividends and an increased share value as the business or asset grows.
We could add real estate as a third category, but for now we will focus our attention on the split
between interest earning and equities. We do this because, as the author ofThe Investment Answer
Dan Goldie says, This is the single most important decision you will make.7 We will use a three step
process to help us make that decision.
The Three Step Process
Through the three step process, we adopt a simple and clear process replacing the complex and
confusing decisions about how we invest our money. The three steps are:
Step 1: Look Back We begin by focusing on past behaviors and decisions using the Financial
Life Cycle.
Step 2: Look Around Examining the Five Fundamentals of Fiscal Fitness we focus on current
behavior, and the effect it has on our wealth building progress.
Step 3: Custom TailorWe employ the Ten Risk Factors to make our final asset allocation fit
you as an individual investor.
7Daniel C. Goldie and Gordon S. Murray, The Investment Answer, (New York: Business Plus, 2011), 32.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
5/23
5
Step 1: Look Back
Our current position in life is a product of our past. Nowhere is this truer than with regard to our
money. Our past decisions and behaviors have a direct impact on our current situation.
Still, it can be difficult to gauge where we are relative to where we should be. The Financial Life Cycle is
the tool we use to answer the question, where am I?
You can find a copy of the Financial Life Cycle in appendix 1. Explanation of how to use and interpret it
is given below.
We examine two things using the Financial Life Cycle. The first is your age and the second is your net
worth. The comparison of your age to your net worth allows us to answer the question, Where are
you? That means whether you are on track, behind, or ahead of schedule. Once we determine your
position on the Financial Life Cycle, we can examine the factors that led to this. Those factors will
include your past decisions and things that have simply happened to you along the way.
The Financial Life Cycle includes other information as well. Each stage of the Financial Life Cycle is
marked by a transition point that signals entry into the next stage. Each stage of the Financial Life Cycle
also contains a broad investment strategy. The final piece of information and our focus here is a starting
point for asset allocation.
Consider the example of a couple, both aged 42, who make $150,000 per year. On the basis of their
age, they should be in the Rapid Accumulation stage of the Financial Life Cycle. The determining factor
will be their net worth. Their net worth should be three to seven times their annual income. We would
expect them to have a net worth between $450,000 and $1,050,000. If their net worth falls in that
range, they are on track.
On the next page, you will find a worksheet to determine your position on the Financial Life Cycle. This
will be the first of three worksheets to work through the three step process using your own information.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
6/23
6
The Financial Life Cycle Worksheet
Assets (all assets you own such as house, investment accounts, bank accounts, vehicles, etc)
1. 7.
2. 8.
3. 9.
4. 10.
5. 11.
6. 12.
Liabilities (all debts such as mortgage, student loans, credit cards, auto loans, etc)
1. 7.
2. 8.
3. 9.
4. 10.
5. 11.
6. 12.
Total Assets: _______________ - Total Liabilities: _______________ = Net Worth: _______________
Annual Living Expenses: _______________
Based on my age, I am in the ______________________________ stage of the Financial Life Cycle.
Based on my net worth, I am in the ______________________________.
(If both stages match, you are on track. If your age places you in a stage ahead of your net worth, you
are behind. If your age places you in a stage behind that of your net worth, you are ahead of schedule.)
I am ______________________________.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
7/23
7
Step 2: Look Around
The second step is to look around using the Five Fundamentals of Fiscal Fitness. The Five Fundamentals
serve to measure our current behavior. Are you doing the things now that will build future success? We
look back at the past with the Financial Life Cycle. We look around at the present with the Five
Fundamentals of Fiscal Fitness.
In my work, I sometimes see clients whose past puts them on track in the Financial Life Cycle. Their
present, however, puts them at the risk of falling behind. The Five Fundamentals help us quickly identify
and remedy this.
The Five Fundamentals are:
1. Save 10% of Annual Income: The very first thing we must do to build wealth is to liveconsistently within our means by saving 10% of our income every year. This is our starting point
the foundation of our savings.
Now, for most of us, our first experience with saving money was when we were growing up as
kids. What were we saving for? We were saving for toys, clothes, or that first car. The point is
that we were saving to spend. It is important to note here that Fundamental 1 is permanent
savings. We are saving to invest.
2. Have Sufficient Liquidity: A lot is written in the financial press about saving for emergencies andhaving an emergency fund. The problem is that much of what is written does not account for
the differences in individual employment situations and the different types of emergency
situations.
To satisfy Fundamental 2, we use a dual approach. The first is to have ready cash. Ready cash is
money that you can get access to today, without penalty. It is our basic reserves. The second
part of the dual approach is to have emergency reserves.
It is important to understand what defines a true emergency. A true emergency is not your car
breaking down on the side of the interstate, your home air conditioner burning up in the middle
of the summer, or your television going out on Super Bowl Sunday. No! A true emergency is
anytime your tax bracket drops. This could be due to increased expenses, decreased income, or
both. Examples are a prolonged medical problem, a divorce, or the death of a spouse. This is
what we are preparing for with emergency reserves.
The amount of money we hold in ready cash and emergency reserves is determined by your
employment situation as follows:
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
8/23
8
Employment Situation % of Annual Income
Ready Cash Emergency Reserves
Employed 10% 20%
Self Employed 20% 40%
Retired 30% 60%
Unemployed 40% 80%
3. Fully Fund Your Qualified Retirement Plans: Chances are that you are not covered by a definedbenefit pension plan. Fundamental 3 is how we measure your progress toward creating your
own pension through tax-deferred retirement savings such as a 401k, traditional IRA, or SEP.
Remember that one of the things that are most important for building wealth is how much you
keep. Tax-deferred savings gives you the opportunity to save money on taxes today so that you
can save more for the future tomorrow. Our goal is to use 80-100% of the tax-deferral
opportunities available to us.
4. Buy the Right Size House: Among all the assets you own, your house is unique. It providesdiversification by giving you real estate exposure. It provides possible investment return
through increased value. Plus, you get to enjoy it every day by living in it. However, a house
that is beyond what can be reasonably afforded will prove to be more of a burden than a
blessing.
The right sized house is one that is valued at two to two and a half times your annual income.
As your income grows, you should upgrade when the house is valued at one and a half times
your annual income.
5. Eliminate Consumer and Credit Card Debt To build wealth, we fund our future first. We do notborrow from our future to pay for our now. We eliminate and limit the use of all forms of
consumer and credit card debts.
Now that you are familiar with the Five Fundamentals of Fiscal Fitness, look around by rating your
progress toward each Fundamental.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
9/23
9
The Five Fundamentals of Fiscal Fitness Worksheet
Fundamental Target How I Rank
1. Save 10% of Annual
Income
10% of annual income in
permanent savings
2. Have Sufficient Liquidity Determined by employment
situation, see table above
3. Fully Fund Your
Qualified Retirement Plans
Use 80-100% of tax-deferred
savings opportunities available
4. Buy the Right Size
House
A house valued at two to two
and a half times annual income
5. Eliminate Consumer and
Credit Card Debt
Consumer and credit card debt
totals no more than 10% of
annual income.
Ranking:
4-5 Fundamentals Achieved: Congratulations! Your current situation helps to sow the seeds of your
future success.
2-3 Fundamentals Achieved: It is time to jump start your progress and address the problem areas
identified by the Five Fundamentals of Fiscal Fitness.
0-1 Fundamentals Achieved: Look out! If you are not already behind, soon you will be. Change course
immediately!
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
10/23
10
Step 3: Custom Tailor
I am sure that right now in your closet or dresser drawer you have that one piece of clothing that fits
better than all the rest. For me, it is my favorite ball cap. For you, it may be hoodie, a pair of stretchy
pants, or that holy t-shirt from college. Whatever it be, it is that one piece of clothing that fits so well
that it is as if the two of you were made for each other. In step three, we want to custom tailor ourasset allocation to fit you.
This is where we bridge the gap from the Financial Life Cycle and Five Fundamentals to you the
individual investor, with a unique story and individual goals. The problem with most asset allocation
models is that they focus only on time and emotional tolerance. Such models suppose that the more
time you have or the younger you are, the more risk you should take. Such models also seek to measure
risk tolerance with simple questions such as, how would you feel if the market dropped 50%?
These asset allocation models leave much to be desired. To make up for where they are lacking, we will
use the Ten Risk Factors to obtain an asset allocation that is authentically yours.
We start with the basic asset allocation obtained from the Financial Life Cycle. We then work through
the Ten Risk Factors and shift our asset allocation based on the results. You can find a blank copy of the
Ten Risk Factors questionnaire in appendix 2. A brief explanation of each risk factor is listed below.
1. Savings as a percentage of income: More than any other factor, how much you save willdetermine your ability to build wealth. A higher level of savings frees us to take more risks in
our asset allocation.
2. Other Risks Taken: The asset allocation of your investment portfolio does not stand alone. It isalso impacted by the risks you take in other areas of life. The more risk you take in other areas
the less you should take with your asset allocation.3. Knowledge of Investments: This factor affects both your emotional tolerance and your ability to
make wise investment choices. The greater your knowledge of investments, the greater your
ability to take risk.
4. Prior Experience with Investments: Prior experience helps you better understand investmentchoices and market cycles. Prior experience increases risk capacity.
5. Inflation Protection: Leveraged real estate is our best inflation protection. We first buy the rightsize house (Fundamental 4). We finance 60-80% of the purchase price of that home with a 30
year fixed rate mortgage to provide inflation protection.
6. Deflation Protection: The interest earning portion of our portfolio provides deflation protection.We build ready cash and emergency reserves (Fundamental 2) into the interest earning part ofour portfolio and invest the remainder in intermediate and long-term interest earning assets.
7. Dependents Spouse: Does your spouse work? The greater the level of dependence by onespouse on the employment of another; the less risk can be taken.
8. Dependents Children: How many children do you have? How many of them are fully dependenton you for support?
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
11/23
11
9. Risk Level Needed to Meet Goals: Are you behind on the Financial Life Cycle? You may have totake more risks if you are.
10.Emotional Tolerance: A good, honest assessment of your ability to handle risk is necessary toproperly gauge your emotional tolerance.
Using the worksheet given in appendix 2, you mark each risk factor as low, medium, or high. You thenadd up all the lows, all the mediums, and all the highs. Next, subtract the total lows from the total
highs. Based on that number, go down from either the interest earning tilt or equity tilt to your
Financial Life Cycle stage to find your custom tailored asset allocation.
Quite often the Ten Risk Factors serve to facilitate discussion or promote thought. The actual asset
allocation that is best for you may differ slightly from the one indicated by the Ten Risk Factors. The Ten
Risk Factors will simply help you get there.
Bridging the Divide
Thus far, we have used the three step process to determine our asset allocation for interest earning andequities. We first looked back at our past with the Financial Life Cycle. We then looked around at our
current situation using the Five Fundamentals of Fiscal Fitness. Finally, we custom tailored our approach
using the Ten Risk Factors.
There are still many specific decisions for us to make. What mutual funds should I use? Should I
diversify and how? These questions and others are important for us to answer as well. Before we do, a
slight review is in order.
Available Asset Classes
To this point we have focused only on interest earning and equities because this decision is the mostimportant. It is necessary though for us to get into a more specific description of available asset classes.
Interest Earning: Interest earning assets can be further categorized by type and time frame.o Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents are short-term interest earning
assets that take the form of bank accounts, money market accounts, or bank CDs with a
maturity of less than 18 months.
o Bonds Bonds are a debt instrument in which the bond issuer owes the bond holder(investor) repayment of principal and interest according to the terms of the bond.
Bonds can be further categorized by time frame
Short Term Bonds or bond mutual funds with a maturity of less than 5 years.
Intermediate Term Bonds or bond mutual funds with a maturity of 5-10 years. Long Term Bonds or bond mutual funds with a maturity of greater than 10
years.
Equities: Equities can be further categorized by the location of the issuing company and size.(Note that although equity assets other than stocks exist we will focus only of stock here.)
o Location
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
12/23
12
Domestic Stock issued by companies headquartered in the United States. Developed Markets Stock issued by companies headquartered in countries
other than the United States with developed economies. Examples of non-US
developed economies are Japan, Great Britain, Germany, and Australia.
Emerging Markets Stock issued by companies headquartered in countries withemerging economies. Examples of emerging economies are China, India, Brazil,
and Russia.
o Size Large Cap Companies with a market valuation of greater than 10 billion
dollars.
Mid Cap Companies with a market valuation of 2-10 billion dollars. Small Cap Companies with a market valuation of less than 2 billion dollars.
Now that we have a basic understanding of how to further categorize asset classes beyond interest
earning and equities, we can begin to examine the specific decisions we will need to make.
Principles for Asset Allocation
Life is filled with basic principles such as dont spit into the wind or never buy a watch from a man who is
out of breath. There are principles that can guide our asset allocation decisions as well. These
principles are not written in stone, and the confusion that exists in other areas exists here as well. We
can, however, find a few guiding principles through careful examination.
Risk and Return
The first guiding principle is that risk and return are inseparable. In order for us to accept more risk, we
must in turn receive more return. However, we cannot obtain greater returns without taking on greater
risk as risk and return go hand in hand.
Diversification
Diversification is our way of acknowledging what we do not know, and the one thing no one knows is
what the future holds. We do not know what is going to happen next. What asset class will perform
best this year? What mutual fund will give the greatest returns over the next five years? No one knows!
Consider the Callan Periodic Table of Investment Returns.8 The Callan Periodic Table charts the returns
of nine market indices for the last twenty years. What we find is that todays winner often becomes
tomorrows loser. The chart reveals that during the last twenty years the current years worst
8The Callan Periodic Table of Investment Returns, Callan Associates, accessed October 5, 2011,
http://www.callan.com/research/periodic.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
13/23
13
performing index became the next years best performing index three times (MSCI Emerging Markets in
1998/1999 and again in 2008/2009, Russell 2000 Value in 1999/2000).
We obtain diversification by investing in asset classes with low positive correlation or negative
correlation. Asset classes that have high correlation move in the same direction. When one asset class
moves higher, the other follows suit. Asset classes with high correlation provide no diversification
benefit.
Asset classes with low correlation or negative correlation move in opposite directions. When one asset
class moves higher, the other moves lower. The two asset classes offset each other. The net effect is
that the two asset classes provide the benefits of diversification by offsetting one another and
smoothing market volatility.
It is important to note that the correlation of asset classes is not set in stone. The correlations may
change over time and can even completely reverse themselves. Also, there are times, such as the most
recent financial crisis, when most asset classes will exhibit positive correlation. Such times are the
exception rather than the rule.
Once we have identified asset classes with low positive or negative correlation, we build our portfolio in
such a way that each asset class is big enough to matter but not so big as to be able to wreck us. Each
asset class should be at least 5% of the portfolio but no more than 25% of the portfolio.
Cash is the one exception to this rule. The amount held in cash and short-term interest-earning assets is
determined by the needs of the individual. We first follow Fundamental 2 and build ready cash and
emergency reserves.
Passively Managed
Every year a great deal of investor time, money, and energy are spent (wasted) on trying to beat the
market. It seems so simple. Who did not know that Wal-Mart, Microsoft, or Google were bound for
tremendous success? The results of attempting to beat the market through active management leave
much to be desired.
Passively managed mutual funds do not try to beat the market. They simply purchase a basket of
securities to match the composition of the funds benchmark index. An example of an index that many
index funds track is the S&P 500, which is composed of stock from 500 of the largest US based
companies.
We must first consider the benefits and pitfalls in the decision to choose an active management strategy
or passive management strategy. Consider first the risk and return of active management.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
14/23
14
The first and most prominent risk is that you will pay higher fees. Remember that how much you keep,
which is based on how much you pay in expense fees and taxes, has a huge influence on your ability to
build wealth. Active managers may or may not beat the market, but whether or not they do, they will
always charge you more for trying.
The high fees investors pay for active management create a hurdle that must be overcome every year
for an actively managed fund to simply match the market, much less beat it. The higher fees act like an
anchor tied to the leg of a long distance swimmer. They serve as a drag on returns.
Academic research bears this point out. William F. Sharpe found that the average actively managed
dollar must underperform the average passively managed dollar net of costs, when properly measured.9
In comparing the resources society spends to invest in the US stock market, Kenneth R. French
discovered that for the 1980-2006 period the representative investor would have increased returns by
0.67% using a passive market portfolio.10
Higher fees create the risk of underperformance. This risk is compounded by the inability of active
managers to consistently generate superior returns. The few active managers, who do provide superior
returns, can be difficult to identify leaving investors who try to constantly find themselves in the
unfortunate situation of a dog chasing his tail.
All of this risk is taken for the singular benefit of market beating returns. But, by how much will the
manager be able to beat the market? Will the manager be able to provide market beating returns on a
consistent basis? If the manager begins to underperform, how do I know when it is time to make a
change?
Passive management offers many advantages over active management. Passively managed funds have
lower costs. They simply match a market index and avoid the costs associated with trying to beat the
market. They also avoid high turnover among their individual holdings. Since passively managed funds
match a market index, there is no risk of underperformance.
We have already noted that 90% of return variability over time can be explained by asset allocation. For
this reason and those mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, I recommend a passive management
approach.
9William F. Sharpe, The Arithmetic of Active Management, Financial Analysts Journal 47, no. 1 (1991): 7-9.
10Kenneth R. French, The Cost of Active Investing (April 9, 2008). Available at SSRN:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1105775
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
15/23
15
Regular Rebalance
Most of the confusion in common financial advice involves buying and selling. Some of the confusion,
though, revolves around staying the course. Every time there is a major market drop, you will read and
hear reports that tell you to stay the course. Youre in it for the long term, they say.
Staying the course is important. Even more important is to make sure you are on the right course. The
three step process of looking back, looking around, and custom tailoring will do that for you. Once you
know you are on the right course, you have got to stay there.
Staying on the right course as it relates to your money is much like floating down a river. The river
changes as you float along. Without a paddle, you might end up wrecked on the rocks. Regular
rebalancing of a portfolio is the paddle we use to stay on course.
Over time your portfolio will move away from the initial targets (split between interest earning and
equities) set by the three step process. This occurs because some asset classes will go up while others
go down. Rebalancing is the process of moving a portfolio back to its asset allocation target by buying,
selling, or redirecting contributions.
At a minimum, you should rebalance your portfolio once a year and at the same time every year.
Rebalancing more often can improve portfolio returns slightly. However, it also requires more time on
the part of the investor. The key is to be consistent in your rebalancing.
The three step process starts us on the right course. Rebalancing keeps us there. To maintain progress,
rebalance your portfolio at least once a year.
Putting It Into Practice
At this point, you have all the information you need to achieve investment success and allocate your
assets using the three step process. To provide further aid to you, here is a comprehensive example of
this process in practice.
Jeff and Linda Smith
Jeff and Linda are 42 and 40 respectively. They have two children, Caleb aged 12 and Bethany aged 10.
Jeff owns his own lawn and landscape maintenance company. His business has grown in recent years,
and he earns an income of $150,000 per year from the business. Linda is a nurse practitioner and earns
$90,000 per year. Their combined annual income is $240,000.
They have lived in the same house for the last 10 years. That house is valued at $350,000. They have a
15 year fixed rate mortgage at 6.5%. The mortgage balance is $130,000.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
16/23
16
Jeff and Linda have saved some money. On average, they save 8% of their annual income. They have
some experience with investments and casual knowledge of investment options. They both know they
need to be investing but worry about making the right choices. The up and down movements of the
market sometimes concern them, but they dont lose any sleep at night.
After subtracting total liabilities from total assets, Jeff and Lindas net worth is $600,000. They have an
auto loan on Lindas 2010 Toyota Four Runner with a balance of $21,560. They also have three credit
cards with a total balance of $9,300. Jeff and Linda have $14,000 in ready cash and $2,000 in emergency
reserves.
Step 1: The Financial Life Cycle
See Appendix 1 for a copy of the Financial Life Cycle. Based on their age, Jeff and Linda should be in the
rapid accumulation stage of the Financial Life Cycle. The transition point that marks entry into the rapid
accumulation stage is when investment earnings begin to exceed savings. The true test is their net
worth. At this stage, Jeff and Linda should have a net worth of 3 to 7 times their annual income
($720,000-$1,680,000). Their net worth is $600,000 (2.5 times annual income). Their investment
portfolio (interest earning and equity holdings) is $230,000. So Jeff and Linda are behind.
At the rapid accumulation stage, our investment strategy will be to focus risk and optimize tax
efficiency. We use a base asset allocation of 40% interest earning and 60% equities.
Step 2: The Five Fundamentals of Fiscal Fitness
The Financial Life Cycle told us where Jeff and Linda are relative to where they should be. It is a
reflection of past decisions and behavior. The Five Fundamentals will examine their current situation.
See page 8 for an explanation of the Five Fundamentals.
1. Save 10% of Annual Income: Jeff and Linda are currently saving 8% of their annual income. Thismay be the primary cause of them being slightly behind on the Financial Life Cycle. They should
immediately increase savings to 10% of annual income ($24,000).
2. Have Sufficient Liquidity: Jeff is self-employed, while Linda is employed. Based on this we willuse a hybrid approach for Fundamental 2. We combine the liquidity requirements for employed
and self-employed to reach a recommendation of 15% ready cash and 30% emergency reserves.
Jeff and Linda currently have $14,000 (6%) in ready cash and $2,000 (0.01%) in emergency
reserves. They should adjust current asset allocation and future contributions to first satisfy
Fundamental 2.
3. Fully Fund Your Qualified Retirement Plans: Linda has access to a 401(k) plan through heremployer. Jeff, being self-employed, has the option to choose a number of tax-deferred plans
for his company. Once they are saving 10% of their annual income (Fundamental 1), Jeff and
Linda should take advantage of at least 80% of the tax-deferral opportunities available to them
through qualified retirement plans.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
17/23
17
4. Buy the Right House: The right sized house for Jeff and Linda would be one valued at $480,000(twice annual income) to $600,000 (2.5 times annual income). They should consider upgrading
their house and financing 80% of the purchase price with a 30 year fixed rate mortgage.
5. Eliminate Consumer and Credit Card Debt: Jeff and Linda should work to pay off their auto loanand credit card debt in the next three years. From that point forward, Fundamentals 1 and 2
will help to prevent further use of consumer and credit card debt.
Step 3 The Ten Risk Factors
See Appendix 2 for a copy of the Ten Risk Factors and page 11 for the Ten Risk Factors explained.
Risk Factor Rating Reason
1. Savings as a percentage of income Low (
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
18/23
18
changed it since. Also, Jeff and Linda have not rebalanced on a regular basis. Their current allocation is
a product of the work they originally did in their 30s, the allocation of their contributions, and the
movements of the market.
The Financial Life Cycle established a base allocation of 40% interest earning and 60% equities. We
refined this base allocation using the Ten Risk Factors to a target asset allocation of 50% interest earning
and 50% equities.
The following is an example of what Jeff and Lindas portfolio might look like.
Percent Asset Class Index
16% Cash N/A
24% Bond: Short Term Barclays Capital 1-5Y Government/Credit Bond Index
5% Bond: Intermediate Term Barclays Capital 5-10Y Government/Credit Bond Index
5% Bond: Long Term Barclays Capital US Long Government/Credit Bond Index
15% Domestic: Large Cap S&P 500 Index10% Domestic: Mid Cap MSCI US Mid Cap 450 Index
10% Domestic: Small Cap MSCI US Small Cap 1750 Index
10% Developed Markets MSCI EAFE Index
5% Emerging Markets MSCI Emerging Markets Index
It is important to note that the cash and bond: short term allocation is driven by Fundamental 2. 16% of
their portfolio in ready cash would be $36,800. 24% of their portfolio in emergency reserves (bond:
short term) would be $55,200. This puts them just short of their emergency reserves target, which is
30% of annual income or $72,000. Future contributions to the interest earning side of their portfolio
should be first directed to bond: short term until they have satisfied their requirement for emergency
reserves.
At this point, we have followed our principles for asset allocation. No individual asset class makes up
more than 25% of Jeff and Lindas portfolio, and all asset classes make up more than 5% of their
portfolio. Their expected return (see appendix 3) from a portfolio such as this is 8.2%. The last thing Jeff
and Linda must do is select low-cost, passively-managed mutual funds that track the proper index and
invest their assets accordingly.
Conclusion
The amount of responsibility we have as individuals to plan for our future is growing. At the same time,
the complexity of the decisions we must make grows as well.
By following the three step process and principles for asset allocation, you can first look back and
examine where you are using the Financial Life Cycle. Through the Five Fundamentals of Fiscal Fitness
you can examine your current situation and establish the habits that will fuel your future success. The
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
19/23
19
Ten Risk Factors and principles for asset allocation will help you custom tailor your approach and stay on
the right course.
All that is left is for you to act. Do so immediately. Neglecting to act is as great a mistake as having an
improper asset allocation to start with. Do not delay. Your future depends on you.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
20/23
20
Appendix 1 The Financial Life Cycle
StageBuilding the
Foundation
Early
Accumulation
Rapid
Accumulation
Financial
Independence
Conservation Distribution Sunset
Transition
Poin
t
Becomes self-
supporting
Net worth more
than annual
income
Investment
earnings exceed
savings
Investment
earnings equal
50% or more of
living costs
Live off
investment
earnings
Have more money
than can be spent
in lifetime
Less than 12
months to live
Net
Worth
Less than annual
income
1-3x annual
income
3-7x annual
income
7-10x annual living
expenses
10-15x annual
living expenses
More than 15x
annual living
expenses
Strategy
Five Fundamentals
of Fiscal Fitness
Diversify into
stocks and bonds
Focus risk and
optimize tax
efficiency
Supplement
earnings with
investment
income
Consolidate lower
risk investments
Start giving money
away kids,
charities, etc.
Distribute assets,
reduce estate
taxes
AssetAllocation
75% Interest
Earning, 25%
Equities
50% Interest
Earning, 50%
Equities
40% Interest
Earning, 60%
Equities
50% Interest
Earning, 50%
Equities
60% Interest
Earning, 40%
Equities
75% Interest
Earning, 25%
Equities
Age 20 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 54 55 - 69 70 - 85 85 +
1996-2004 Bert Whitehead, MBA, JD/Cambridge Advisors
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
21/23
21
Appendix 2: The Ten Risk Factors
Client: ________________________________________
Risk Factor Low Medium High
1. Savings as a percentage of income 12%2. Other risks taken (job, business, etc.) Many Some Few
3. Knowledge of investments Not very Moderate Very
4. Prior experience with investments Not Very Moderate Very
5. Inflation protection (leveraged R/E) Fair Good Great
6. Deflation protection (treasuries) Fair Good Great
7. Dependents: Spouse Full Support Partial Support N/A
8. Dependents: Children Full Support Partial Support N/A
9. Risk level needed to meet goals Low Medium High
10. Emotional tolerance Low Medium High
TOTALS
Total Highs minus Total Lows = __________
Interest Earning Tilt Default Equity Tilt
Stage -8 -10 -5 -7 -2 -4 -1,0,+1 +2 +4 +5 +7 +8 +10
Building the Foundation 90/ 85/ 80/ 75/25 /30 /35 /40
Early Accumulation 65/ 60/ 55/ 50/50 /55 /60 /65
Rapid Accumulation 55/ 50/ 45/ 40/60 /65 /70 /75
Financial Independence 65/ 60/ 55/ 50/50 /55 /60 /65
Conservation 75/ 70/ 65/ 60/40 /45 /50 /55Distribution 90/ 85/ 80/ 75/25 /30 /35 /40
2004-2008 Alliance of Cambridge Advisors, Inc. All Rights Reserved
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
22/23
22
Appendix 3: Expected Returns
Asset Allocation Compound
Annual
Return
(Since
1926)
Worst Returns (Last 50 Years Recent Down Markets
StocksInterest
Earning1 year 3 years 5 years
10
years
10 year
(annualized)
1973-
74
2000-
022008
10 90 5.4% -1.2% 5.8% 15.5% 24.6% 3.7% 7.2% 17.4% 2.8%
15 85 5.8% -0.1% 9.6% 21.1% 52.1% 4.3% 4.4% 14.3% 0.6%
20 80 6.2% -1.7% 9.2% 20.4% 52.4% 4.3% 1.6% 11.2% -1.7%
25 75 6.5% -4.0% 7.0% 19.2% 51.2% 4.2% -1.2% 8.1% -4.0%
30 70 6.9% -6.3% 4.8% 18.0% 49.8% 4.1% -3.9% 5.1% -6.3%
35 65 7.3% -8.6% 2.2% 16.6% 48.2% 4.0% -6.6% 2.2% -8.6%
40 60 7.6% -10.8% -0.7% 15.2% 46.4% 3.9% -9.2% -0.7% -10.8%
45 55 7.9% -13.1% -3.5% 13.7% 44.0% 3.7% -11.8% -3.5% -13.1%
50 50 8.2% -15.4% -6.3% 12.0% 41.4% 3.5% -14.4% -6.3% -15.4%
55 45 8.6% -17.7% -9.1% 9.2% 38.7% 3.3% -16.9% -9.1% -17.7%
60 40 8.8% -20.0% -11.8% 6.4% 35.8% 3.1% -19.4% -11.8% -20.0%
65 35 9.1% -22.3% -14.4% 3.6% 32.8% 2.9% -21.9% -14.4% -22.3%70 30 9.4% -24.5% -17.0% 0.8% 29.7% 2.6% -24.3% -17.0% -24.5%
75 25 9.7% -26.8% -19.5% -2.0% 26.4% 2.4% -26.7% -19.5% -26.8%
80 20 9.9% -29.1% -22.0% -4.8% 23.0% 2.1% -29.0% -22.0% -29.1%
85 15 10.1% -31.4% -24.4% -7.6% 19.4% 1.8% -31.4% -24.4% -31.4%
90 10 10.3% -33.7% -26.8% -10.3% 15.8% 1.5% -33.6% -26.8% -33.7%
Note: The statistics above reflect a stock allocation of 75% domestic: large cap and 25% domestic: small cap prior
to 1966. After 1965, the stock allocation is 60% domestic: large cap, 20% domestic: small cap, and 20%
international. The bond allocation is 50% short-term and 50% intermediate-term.
8/3/2019 Three Simple Steps to Investment Success
23/23
23
Bibliography
The Callan Periodic Table of Investment Returns. Callan Associates. Accessed October 5, 2011.
http://www.callan.com/research/periodic.
Employer Health Benefits 2010 Summary of Findings. The Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research &
Educational Trust, (2010): 1-2.
French, Kenneth R. The Cost of Active Investing (April 9, 2008). Available at SSRN:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1105775.
Goldie, Daniel C. and Gordon S. Murray. The Investment Answer. New York: Business Plus, 2011.
Ibbotson, Roger G. and Paul D. Kaplan, Does Asset Allocation Policy Explain 40, 90, or 100 Percent of
Performance. Financial Analysts Journal. January/February (2000): 32
Kamenetz, Anya. Generation Debt. New York: Riverhead Books, 2007.
McCourt, Stephen P. Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans: A History, Market Overview andComparative Analysis. Benefits & Compensation Digest. 43, no. 2 (2006): 1-2. Accessed September 28,
2011. http://www.ifebp.org/PDF/webexclusive/feb06.pdf.
Pension Insurance Data Book 2009. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, (2010): 25.
Sharpe, William F. The Arithmetic of Active Management. Financial Analysts Journal. 47, no. 1 (1991): 7-9.
Recommended