View
49
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
The timing behaviour of radio pulsars. George Hobbs Australia Telescope National Facility george.hobbs@csiro.au. Contents. Radio pulsars Pulsar timing A few things that you can do with pulsar timing Young pulsars - a new (predictive?) model for timing noise - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The timing behaviour of radio pulsars
George HobbsAustralia Telescope National Facilitygeorge.hobbs@csiro.au
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Contents
• Radio pulsars• Pulsar timing• A few things that you can do with pulsar timing• Young pulsars - a new (predictive?) model for timing noise
• What has this to do with this conference? - pulsars are compact objects - radio pulsar timing is a powerful technique for studying pulsars - can determine parameters of interest - neutron star masses, rotation rates etc. - can study the pulsar spin-down => implications for internal structure of neutron star.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Let’s start at the beginning
08:35:20.61 -45:10:34.87
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Radio pulsars
QuickTime™ and aMicrosoft Video 1 decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Animation: Michael Kramer
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Properties of radio pulsars
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Must average many thousands of pulses together to obtain stable profile
Must convert to reference frame suitable for the timing model – e.g. solar system barycentre
Must convert to arrival times at infinite frequency
Must convert to conform with terrestrial time standards
Must add extra propagation delays e.g. through the solar system
Pulsar timing: The basics(see Hobbs, Edwards & Manchester 2006, MNRAS)
Obtain pulse arrival times at observatory
Model for pulsar spin down
Form timing residuals – how good is the timing model at predicting the arrival times
Improve timing model
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
What can we do with the timing model?
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Some examples: pulsar velocities
• With long data spans can get accurate pulsar proper motions - with a distance estimate can obtain velocities.
• Mean space velocity ~ 400km/s (Hobbs et al. 2005)
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Determine pulsar masses and testing GR
• Champion et al. (2008) Science: PSR J1903+0327, NS mass = 1.74 ± 0.04 Mo (unusually large)
• Double pulsar (B) has mass 1.25 Mo - significantly smaller (Lyne et al. 2004 Sci)
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
What can we do with the timing residuals?
• Residuals are a measure of unmodelled physics
• Are these residuals from …• The pulsar spin-down• Terrestrial time standards• Pulse propagation through the
interstellar medium• Orbital companions to the
pulsar• Gravitational waves!• Errors in the planetary
ephemeris• …
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Spin-down irregularities
No angular signature
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Terrestrial time standard irregularities
Monopolar signature
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Errors in the planetary ephemerides - e.g. error in the mass of Jupiter
Dipolar signature
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
What if gravitational waves exist?
Quadrapolar signature
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
The post-fit planet ‘signal’: The effect of fitting
CSIRO. Measuring the mass of Jupiter using pulsars
Jupiter
Mars
Simulations of 10 years of pulsar residuals with an RMS of 100ns
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Current status (Champion et al. 2009, in prep)
• Use data from Parkes, Arecibo, Effelsberg and Nancay radio telescopes
MSun Best Published This work
Mercury 1.66013(7)x10-7 1.660(2)x10-7
Venus 2.4478686(4)x10-6 2.44782(10)x10-6
Mars 3.227151(9)x10-7 3.2277(8)x10-7
Jupiter* 9.547919(8)x10-4 9.547916(4)x10-4
Saturn 2.85885670(8)x10-4 2.858858(14)x10-4
9.54791915(11)x10-4
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
The timing residuals of young pulsars
• 76-m Lovell Radio Telescope• 366 pulsars with tspan > 10yr• Hobbs, Lyne & Kramer (2004)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Not high time precision experiments
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Pulsar timing residuals (fit for F0 and F1)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Difficulties when categorising timing noise
• B1746-20
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
• B1900+01
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Difficulties when categorising timing noise: depends on data span
• PSR B1818-04• Any simple
classification scheme would change with data span.
• Most large-scale analyses of timing noise used ~3 yr of data.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
What timing noise is not!
• Not observatory dependent - many pulsars also observed at other observatories - see same timing noise
• Not off-line processing (use ‘tempo2’ and ‘psrtime’)
• Not terrestrial time scales/planetary ephemeris errors - too large
• Not ISM effect - not frequency dependent
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Previous models of timing noise
• Random walks in the pulse frequency or its derivatives• Free-precession of the neutron star• Unmodelled planetary companions• Asteroid belts• Magnetospheric effects• Interstellar/interplanetary medium effects• Unmodelled Post-Keplerian orbital parameters• Accretion onto the pulsar’s surface• Large numbers of small glitch events
• These models were based on short data sets• Mainly model random, “noise-like” timing residuals
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Significant F2 values (= cubics in timing residuals)
• Glitch events => F2 > 0 (Lyne, Shemar & Graham-Smith 2000)• All pulsars with c < 105 yr have F2 > 0• For older pulsars 52% have F2 > 0.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
• Timing noise in young pulsars caused by glitch recovery.
• Timing noise in older pulsars caused by something else!
• Globular cluster pulsar
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Periodicities: B1540-06
• Significant 4.38yr periodicity• If planet then Earth-mass. However,
significant residuals remain in the timing after fitting for a planet
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Periodicities: B1642-03
• Time between successive peaks range from 3.4yr to 6.6yr
• Radius of curvature smaller at local maxima than at minima
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Periodicities: B1818-04
• Time between peaks ranges between 7 and 10 years. No significant individual periodicities.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Periodicities: B1826-17
• Significant periodicity at 2.9yr (however time between peaks varies by ~10%).
• Local maxima have smaller curvature than minima
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Periodicities: B1828-11
• Significant periodicities - main periodicity at 500d.
• 3 components to the slow-down• Modelled by Stairs et al. as free-
precession
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Periodicities: B2148+63
• Significant periodicity at 3.2yr, 7.1yr and 2.1yr.
• Larger radius of curvature at maxima than at minima
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
PSR B1931+24• PSR B1931+24 has recently been
reported to undergo “extreme nulling” events (Kramer et al. 2006)
• Normal pulsar for 5 to 10 days• Switches off for up to 35 days• The pulsar spin-down rate changes
by ~50% between the on and off states (pulsar spinning down faster when “on”)
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Directly looking at F1 values
• PSR J2043-2740• First pulsar we looked at:• Has 2 F1 values• Has correlated pulse shape
changesQuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Modelling B1828-11
• Implication: B1828-11 is not undergoing free-precession!• Undergoes mode 1, 2, 3, 2 ….
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
More 1828-11 simulations
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
PSR J1107-5907
• Recently discovered pulsar with three pulse profiles:• 1) a very strong profile (brightness rivals that of Vela)• 2) weak profile• 3) completely undetectable
• => some pulsars exhibit 3 “magnetospheric modes” - have not yet checked to look for correlated slow-down rates.
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
The implications of the model
• Have a link between various time-dependent phenomena in pulsars: long-term moding/extreme nulling/intermittency/free-precession/timing noise
• Timing noise linked to magnetospheric changes• Quasi-random nature of the mode switches => a random walk in F1 => large
scale cubics can exist in the timing residuals
• Note: have no understanding of the process creating multiple spin-down rates, but it seems that large changes in spin-down rate => large pulse shape changes.
• 50% change in spin-down rate B1931-24 (large shape changes)• ~% change in spin-down rate B1828-11 (moderate shape changes)• Fraction of a % change in spin-down rate B1540-06 (small shape changes?)
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Glitches
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
An aside: slow glitches
• Zou et al. (2004) reported a new phenomenon known as “slow glitches”
• No difference between “slow glitches” and timing noise!
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
• B1822-09 (vertical lines are slow-glitches according to Shabanova (2007)
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Glitches
• Sudden speedup in rotation period, relaxing back in days to years
• The pulse structure is not notably affected by a glitch => phenomena internal to the neutron star
• Current model is that superfluid vortices in the neutron star ‘pin’ to the surface/crust. Catastrophic unpinning leads to a glitch event.
• 285 glitches published in 101 objects.• 65% of the glitching pulsars have only glitched once• PSR J1740-3015 has glitched 33 times
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Glitches
• Melatos, Peralta & Wyithe (2008, ApJ) suggest that glitch events follow an avalanche model.
• Waiting time between glitches is consistent with a Poissionian process.
• … we’re writing a new paper containing more pulsar glitches … • What would you like us to present? Clearly, the glitches are
telling us something about the interior of the pulsar … but how do we extract the information?
CSIRO. Gravitational wave detection
Conclusion
• You can do lots of physics/astronomy with radio pulsar timing observations
• Most millisecond pulsars are very stable rotators• The spin-down of the youngest pulsars is dominated by glitch
recovery• The spin-down of most pulsars is dominated by a quasi-
periodic phenomenon.
• This is probably telling us something about the interior of the neutron star!
Recommended