View
253
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
1/127
DigitalResources
Electronic Survey Report 2011-025
The Kuki-Chin Communities of
Bangladesh:
A sociolinguistic survey
Amy Kim
Palash Roy
Mridul Sangma
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
2/127
The Kuki-Chin CommunitiesofBangladesh:
A sociolinguistic survey
Researched by:
Amy Kim
Palash Roy
Mridul Sangma
SIL International
2011
SIL Electronic Survey Report 2011-025, March 2011
Copyright 2011 Amy Kim, Palash Roy, Mridul Sangma, and SIL International
All rights reserved
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
3/127
Abstract
There are five people groups in Bangladesh whose languages are classified as Kuki-Chin
languages: the Bawm, the Khumi, the Khyang, the Lushai, and the Pangkhua. This paper
reports on sociolinguistic research that took place among speakers of each of these language
varieties. The goals of the research included better understanding the linguistic relationship
among these languages, investigating regional differences within each of these languages, and
examining speakers attitudes towards and bilingual abilities in other languages. Fieldwork for
this research took place from October 2007 through January 2008. The appendices are available
in the Bangla version only.
k-k, g, , , i o einn ute
i ep eigtm, eig
peeig an
pedoiei akn ei
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
4/127
1
Contents
Abstract
Table of Figures
Preface
1. Introduction
1.1. Purposes and goals
1.1.1. Study of the language varieties
1.1.2. Language attitudes, vitality, and bilingualism study
1.2. Language
1.3. Geographical location
2. Summary of Findings
2.1. Study of the language varieties
2.2. Language attitudes, vitality, and bilingualism study3. Study of the Language Varieties
3.1. Procedures
3.2. Discussion of sample
3.3. Results
3.3.1. Pangkhua
3.3.2. Bawm
3.3.3. Lushai
3.3.4. Khyang
3.3.5. Khumi
4. Language Attitudes, Vitality, and Bilingualism Study
4.1. Procedures
4.2. Discussion of sample
4.3. Results
4.3.1. Language use
4.3.2. Language attitudes
4.3.3. Language vitality
4.3.4. Bilingualism
5. Recommendations
References
Appendix A (). WordlistsAppendix B (). Questionnaires
Appendix C (). Sociolinguistic questionnaire responses
Appendix D (). Subject demographic information
Appendix E (). Bangladesh Kuki-Chin community information
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
5/127
2
Table of Figures
Figure 1: Outline of the research work
Figure 2: Classification of Kuki-Chin languages in Bangladesh
Figure 3: Map of Bangladesh (Chittagong division shaded)Figure 4: Map of location of villages visited for this research
Figure 5: Wordlist collection sites
Figure 6: Lexical similarity chart
Figure 7: Bangladesh Kuki-Chin community language use information chart
Figure 8: Information about which language should be used as the medium of
education in primary school
Figure 9: Reasons for sending children to mother tongue and Bangla classes
Figure 10: Responses to language vitality questions
Figure 11: Responses to one other language vitality question
Figure 12: Responses to sociolinguistic questionnaire question 2
Figure 13: Responses to sociolinguistic questionnaire question 4
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
6/127
3
Preface
As one part of SIL Bangladeshs efforts to help in the development of Bangladeshs
minority languages, language research was done among the Kuki-Chin communities
of Bangladesh. To do this research we travelled in the Chittagong Hill Tracts fromManglung Headman Para of Thanci subdistrict (Bandarban district) to Konglak
village of Sajek union in Baghaichari subdistrict (Rangamati district). This report is
a result of this Kuki-Chin language research.
We give our heartfelt thanks to those who helped us in a variety of ways as we did
this research. We want to give special thanks to the Kuki-Chin community leaders
who helped us by giving their valuable time, information, and advice. We are also
very grateful for all the people in each village we visited who enabled us to do this
work more efficiently by welcoming us into their midst and answering our questions.
Finally, we want to say thanks to those who generously fed us and gave us places to
stay at night. We pray for full blessings for each of these people.
Dhaka, Bangladesh
June 2008
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
7/127
4
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Purposes and goals
The main purpose of this sociolinguistic research was to gather information that
could be of use in a language development program for any of Bangladeshs Kuki-
Chin communities.1 Through this research we wanted to learn which Kuki-Chin
languages actually exist in Bangladesh and what the linguistic similarity is among
these languages. Furthermore, we sought to learn what peoples attitudes are
towards various languages, what the approximate populations of the various Kuki-
Chin communities are, whether there are regional differences within a given Kuki-
Chin language, and what languages members of different Kuki-Chin language
communities use to communicate with each other. To fulfill these purposes, we set
the following goals:1. To know which Kuki-Chin languages are used in Bangladesh2. To determine the extent of the linguistic relationship among these Kuki-Chin
languages
3. To investigate regional differences within each of the various Kuki-Chinlanguages in Bangladesh
4. To better understand speakers attitudes towards other Kuki-Chin languagesand also towards Bangla
5. To have a better understanding of the bilingual abilities of the members ofthe various Kuki-Chin communities in Bangladesh.
To accomplish all of these goals, this research work was divided into two parts: 1) a
study of language variation among the Kuki-Chin languages in Bangladesh and 2) a
language attitudes, vitality, and bilingualism study. Figure 1 shows the methods
used in this Kuki-Chin research.
1Originally written in Bangla by Mridul Sangma; portions translated by Amy Kim.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
8/127
5
Figure 1: Outline of the research work
Study Method Description Focus Number
Study of the
language
varieties
Leader
interviews
Conversations
with various
Kuki-Chin
community
leaders
Geographical
locations, population
figures, language
differences
At least 10
interviews
Lexical
similarity
comparison
List of 306
words
Lexical similarity and
variation among
various communities
2 wordlists
from each
community
Intelligibility
study
5 questions
Language variation
and intelligibility
among variouscommunities
83 subjects
from 8
villagesrepresenting
5 language
communitiesLanguage
attitudes,
vitality, and
bilingualism
study
Sociolinguistic
questionnaire19 questions
Language
preferences, domains
of language use,
ability in a second
language, and
education medium
Community
information
questionnaire
32 questions 9 villages
1.1.1. Study of the language varieties
Lexical Similarity Comparison
An initial method used in the language research of the Kuki-Chin communities of
Bangladesh was the gathering of a 306-item wordlist. We went to a total of nine
villages and collected two wordlists from each of five language communities,
making a total of 10 wordlists. Four villages were in three different subdistricts of
Bandarban district, and five villages were in three different subdistricts of
Rangamati district. These villages were chosen based on the information and advicegiven us by leaders of the five Kuki-Chin language communities studied. All of the
wordlists were compared with each other in order to ascertain the degree of lexical
similarity among these five language varieties. Appendix. (A.1) in the Bangla
version of this report gives information about how wordlists were compared with
each other.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
9/127
6
Intelligibility Study
On a language tree, the Kuki-Chin languages of Bangladesh are of the same
language family, but they lie on different branches. As a result, their lexical
similarity is low. Also, within a given language community some regional
differences can be seen, and because of geographical difference, speakers of a singlelanguage community may have neighbors from different language communities. In
light of these differences, we did an intelligibility study to get an idea of how much
speakers from the various communities can understand each other. The
intelligibility study consisted, however, of only a questionnaire. We didnt use other
methods as part of the intelligibility study.
1.1.2. Language attitudes, vitality, and bilingualism study
A sociolinguistic questionnaire was used to better understand topics such as the
attitudes that speakers from a particular Kuki-Chin community hold towards other
languages, whether each of these Kuki-Chin language varieties will survive in the
future, and what speakers abilities are in languages other than their mother tongues.
We also wanted to know peoples opinions regarding medium of education. All of
these questions are given in appendix (B) of the Bangla version of this report.
1.2. Language
Language is mans chief way of expressing thoughts, of exchanging ideas, and of
preserving communication. The worlds languages are divided into different familiesand branches and sub-branches. In the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh there
are about eleven indigenous people groups (Chakma, Marma, Tripura, Mro,
Tangchangya, Bawm, Chak, Khumi, Pangkhua, Khyang, and Lushai) (Loncheu 2004).
The languages of a majority of these eleven communities have been classified as
part of the Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman language family, and five have been
classified within the Tibeto-Burman language family as being Kuki-Chin-Naga, Kuki-
Chin. These five languages are Pangkhua, Bawm, Lushai, Khyang, and Khumi
(Gordon 2005). Although all five of these languages are Kuki-Chin languages, all do
not belong to the same language branch or sub-branch. For example, Pangkhua,
Bawm, and Lushai are all central Kuki-Chin languages. Among these there are no
sub-branches. Among thesouthern Kuki-Chin languages, however, two sub-branches
are the Sho and the Khumi. Khyang (also known as Chin, Asho) is included in
the Sho sub-branch. Two languages included in the Khumi sub-branch are Chin,
Khumi and Chin, Khumi Awa. Figure 2 depicts the language classifications and
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
10/127
7
relationships of the Kuki-Chin languages in Bangladesh. The shaded boxes contain
the names of the five languages themselves.
Figure 2: Classification of Kuki-Chin languages in Bangladesh
Mizo (Lushai) is the official language of the state of Mizoram, India. There is a
variety of literature in Mizo, which is written in Roman script. There is also
literature available in Bawm and in Khumi, both of which are written in Roman
script. In Pangkhua and Khyang, however, there is essentially no literature although,
of course, there are oral folk tales and songs in these languages. Pangkhuacommunity members use Lushai literature, and those Khyang who live near Bawm
speakers use some Bawm literature.
1.3. Geographical location
The Chittagong Hill Tracts are situated in the southeast of Bangladesh. Most parts of
this area are covered with hills and dense forests, and the area has many waterfalls
Sino-Tibetan
Tibeto-
Burman
Kuki-Chin-
Naga
Kuki-Chin
Central
Chin,
Bawm
Pangkhua Mizo
(Lushai)
Southern
Khumi Sho
Chin,
Khumi
Chin, Asho
(Khyang)
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
11/127
8
and more than 100 mountain streams. Along the southeast border of the Chittagong
Hill Tracts lie Myanmars Chin and Rakhine states, to the east and northeast is
Indias Mizoram state, and to the north and northwest is Indias Tripura state.
Within Bangladesh the western and southern borders of the Chittagong Hill Tracts
are made up of the Chittagong district and the Coxs Bazar district borders,respectively. The Chittagong Hill Tracts are divided into three districts: Rangamati,
Bandarban, and Khagrachari. Approximately half of the total population in these
three hill districts are from indigenous communities (Wikipedia 2008). The Kuki-
Chin communities discussed in this report live in this area along with members of
other indigenous communities. Figure 3 shows all of Chittagong division in relation
to the country of Bangladesh.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
12/127
9
Figure 3: Map of Bangladesh (Chittagong division shaded)
Most members of the Kuki-Chin communities live in Rangamati and Bandarban
districts of Chittagong division. The Kuki-Chin villages we visited for the purposes
of this research are given in figure 4.
DhakaDivision
Rajshahi
Division SylhetDivision
BarisalDivision
KhulnaDivision
Chittagong Division
N
Division boundaryInternational boundary
ChittagongDivision
SE
MMYYAANNMMAARR
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
13/127
10
Figure 4: Map of location of villages visited for this research
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
14/127
11
Pangkhua
At present many people from the Pangkhua community in Bangladesh live in
Bilaichari Pangkhua Para, a village in Bilaichari subdistrict in the southeastern part
of Rangamati district. There are also a few Pangkhua villages in Barkal and
Jorachari subdistricts of Rangamati district, and there are a couple more villages inSajek union of Baghaichari subdistrict, which is along the borders of the Indian
states of Mizoram and Tripura.
Along Kaptai lake in Jorachari, Barkal, and Bilaichari subdistricts, there are many
small islands that look like hills in the lake. To get to any Pangkhua villages in this
area, one must go by motor boat. It is best to travel there during or just after rainy
season because at these times the lake is full, making travel by motor boat to any
area possible. In summertime before rainy season, however, the water level in the
lake is lower, making travel difficult. During this time one must walk long distances
to most places. Most Pangkhua villages in Sajek union of Baghaichari subdistrict are
situated in difficult-to-access hilly areas.
Bawm
The Bawm live in both Rangamati and Bandarban districts, but most are in
Bandarban district. Bethel Para in Ruma subdistrict of Bandarban district is one
large Bawm village. The Bawm live in other places in Ruma subdistrict and also in
various places in Rowangchari and Thanci subdistricts of Bandarban district. In
Rangamati district there are some Bawm living in Rangamati Sadar and in Barkal
and Bilaichari subdistricts.
Lushai
The population of the Lushai in Bangladesh is very small. Although there are some
Lushai families living in Bandarban Sadar subdistrict, most of these families have
become mixed with other people groups, especially with the Bawm. At present
Mahmuam Para in the Ruilui area of Sajek union in northern Rangamati district is
the only known Lushai village in Bangladesh. There are also reportedly a few Lushai
families living in Sylhet Sadar subdistrict in Sylhet district.
Khyang
The majority of the Khyang in Bangladesh live in Ghilachari union of Rajasthali
subdistrict in Rangamati district and in Bandarban Sadar, Rowangchari, and Thanci
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
15/127
12
subdistricts in Bandarban district. In addition, there are several Khyang community
members living in Chandanaish subdistrict of Chittagong district.
Khumi
The Khumi generally live in relatively difficult-to-access villages in the forests of
Rowangchari, Ruma, and Thanci subdistricts of Bandarban district. Among these
three subdistricts there are more Khumi people in Thanci than in the other two.
Nearly all of the above-mentioned places are in hilly areas, and to reach most of
them one must travel by paths in the hills. An exception to this is the area where the
Khyang live in and around Ghungurumukh Para in Bandarban Sadar subdistrict,
which is more of a plains area.
2. Summary of Findings
2.1. Study of the language varieties
There is not a great amount of linguistic similarity among the five Kuki-Chin
languages found in Bangladesh, and each should be considered a language that is
separate from the others. The amount of similarity among the Pangkhua, Bawm, and
Lushai languages is a little greater than is the similarity in any other combination of
languages. The lexical similarity percentages among these three languages is 30
47%. Thus, even a speaker of any one of these three languages must learn the other
two languages to understand them well.
Within each of the Pangkhua and Lushai languages, there are small language
differences but no great regional or dialectal differences. Among Bawm speakers,
those who live rather far away from the center of the Bawm people group recognize
some regional differences in Bawm speech. In spite of these differences, Bawm
people from any one area have good understanding of the language of Bawm people
from any other area.
Among each of the Khyang and Khumi language communities, however, notableregional differences do exist. The names of the two main Khyang language varieties
are Laitu (plains area Khyang) and Kongtu (hill area Khyang). The lexical similarity
percentage between these two varieties is 78%. The plains area Khyang can
reportedly understand Kongtu better than the hill area Khyang can understand Laitu.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
16/127
13
Although regional language differences also exist among the Khumi, most
questionnaire subjects said they can understand most of the speech of Khumi people
from other areas. It is also very possible that, although there are differences between
the Khumi language of Myanmar and that of Bangladesh, these people, too, can
understand each other. Based on researcher observation, the use of Khumi literaturefrom Myanmar, and a lexical similarity percentage of 6872% between Myanmar
Khumi and Bangladesh Khumi, it can be said that Bangladesh Khumi people can
probably communicate somewhat easily with the Khumi from Myanmar. Detailed
information of all the lexical similarity percentages are given in section 3.3, figure 6.
2.2. Language attitudes, vitality, and bilingualism study
Mother tongue use among the people from each of the five Kuki-Chin communities
in Bangladesh is strong. They still use their mother tongue among themselves, but
with their neighbors from other language groups they speak the neighboring
language or Bangla. With the exception of the Khumi, people from each of the other
four language groups said they think their children and grandchildren will speak
their mother tongue in the future. Given this and the strong mother tongue language
use taking place today, it is probable that these languages will remain vital for at
least a few more generations.
In the not-too-distant future, however, Lushai may no longer be used in Bangladesh
because their population is very small and continues to decrease. In India, however,Lushai or Mizo language may remain vital for ages to come because in Mizoram
there is a lot of literature written in Lushai and Lushai language use is strong.
Among the other four languages discussed here, Khumi is possibly the least vital.
For very practical reasons, people from Bangladeshs Kuki-Chin communities
expressed the opinion that the language of instruction in primary school should be
Bangla. They believe that if their children are taught in Bangla, then these children
will be able to learn Bangla well. They also said, however, that their children should
firstlearn in their mother tongue and then in Bangla. It should be noted that the
Bawm community has an especially strong positive attitude towards their mother
tongue. Among the other four communities, peoples attitudes towards their mother
tongue do not seem to be negative, but they also are not notably positive.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
17/127
14
The languages that Bangladeshs Kuki-Chin community members speak as second
languages are largely determined by who their neighbors are. Speakers of a given
Kuki-Chin community may speak Marma, Chakma, Tripura, or another Kuki-Chin
language if these are who their neighbors are. Many also speak some Bangla. This
research shows, however, that none of these five Kuki-Chin communities hassufficient ability in either Bangla or in a neighboring language to be able to use that
languages written or oral literature well.
3. Study of the Language Varieties
3.1. Procedures
Comparing the words of different language varieties is one way to measure lexical
similarity. In this research of Bangladeshs Kuki-Chin languages, 306-item wordlists
were collected in different Kuki-Chin languages. Lexical similarities were then
calculated as a percentage of these 306 words which resemble each other in sound
(Blair 1990). Normally a wordlist is collected in the same village from two separate
people so as to ensure greater accuracy and certainty of the words. During this
survey, however, in each area where a wordlist was collected there were several
people sitting with the wordlist informant. Thus, the wordlist was not collected a
second time because through the group we could be sure that the word given by the
main informant was accurate and used in that area. In Konglak, however, it was not
possible to follow this method when collecting a Pangkhua wordlist because otherthan the one wordlist informantwho was not even born or brought up in that
neighborhoodnobody else knew Pangkhua well. The wordlists were written using
the International Phonetic Alphabet. They were then compared according to the
established procedures given in appendices.. and..in the Bangla version ofthis report. The WordSurvcomputer program designed by SIL (Wimbish 1989) was
used to do the final lexical similarity calculations.
A sociolinguistic questionnaire, a community information questionnaire, and leader
interviews were used to better understand how well speakers of one Kuki-Chin
language variety are able to understand other Kuki-Chin languages in Bangladesh.
Questions 7ad and 8 of the sociolinguistic questionnaire were about language
variation and intelligibility. These questions are given in appendix . (B.1) in the
Bangla version of this report. Other questions of the sociolinguistic questionnaire
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
18/127
15
were used to study bilingualism, language attitudes, and language vitality, all of
which are discussed in section 4 of this report.
The questionnaires were asked directly in Bangla with subjects who could
understand Bangla. With those subjects who could not understand Bangla well, the
questions were asked in that persons mother tongue with the assistance of someone
from their community.
3.2. Discussion of sample
Wordlists were collected in a total of nine villages in two hill districts. These nine
villages represent five Kuki-Chin communities. Figure 5 shows which community
each wordlist was collected from and which subdistrict and district that collection
site is located in.
Figure 5: Wordlist collection sites
Village Community Subdistrict and district
Bilaichari Pangkhua Bilaichari, Rangamati
Konglak Pangkhua Baghaichari, Rangamati
Bethel Para Bawm Ruma, Bandarban
Jamunachari Bawm Bilaichari, Rangamati
Bethel Para Lushai Ruma, Bandarban
Mahmuam Para (Ruilui area) Lushai Baghaichari, RangamatiBoro Kukyachari Khyang Rajasthali, Rangamati
Ghungurumukh Para Khyang Bandarban Sadar, Bandarban
Manglung Headman Para Khumi Thanci, Bandarban
Prongphung Para Khumi Ruma, Bandarban
These wordlist sites were chosen based on information given by leaders of the
various Kuki-Chin communities. In talking with various leaders and other people,
we came to know that, apart from Lushai, there is some variation within each of the
other languages, and this language variation is often based on geographical
difference. Thus, to better understand these differences or similarities, two sites
were chosen for each language community. Importance was also given to distance
and transportation to a village. In Bangladesh most Kuki-Chin villages are in
difficult-to-access areas of Rangamati and Bandarban districts, and some villages
have small populations while others have a larger number of people. Those villages
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
19/127
16
which have comparatively large populations were chosen as long as they could be
accessed. As much as was possible, we chose villages where a good and accurate
wordlist could be collected and where it was possible to get a good sample of
subjects for the sociolinguistic questionnaire.
At present the Pangkhua people live in Bilaichari, Jorachari, Barkal, and
Baghaichari subdistricts of Rangamati district. Within Baghaichari they live in only
a couple villages in Sajek union. In comparison with Baghaichari, Jorachari and
Barkal are closer to Bilaichari. Also, the Pangkhua in Bilaichari said that in the three
subdistricts of Bilaichari, Jorachari, and Barkal the Pangkhua is the same. Within
Barkal and Bilaichari subdistricts the largest Pangkhua village is Bilaichari
Pangkhua Para. Thus, Bilaichari Pangkhua Para was chosen as one data collection
site. Because Konglak village of Sajek union in Baghaichari subdistrict is remote,
this was chosen as a second Pangkhua site in order to be able to understand if there
is any language difference based on distance. Konglak was chosen over other
villages in Sajek union because other villages are very difficult to access, and there
wasnt time to go by foot to these villages which take a long time to reach.
According to Bangladeshs Bawm community leaders, there is a little difference in
the pronunciation and intonation of the Bawm spoken by those in Rangamati as
compared to that spoken by those in Bandarban. Thus, Jamunachari Bawm Para in
Bilaichari subdistrict of Rangamati district and Bethel Para in Ruma subdistrict of
Bandarban district were chosen as the two Bawm data collection sites. These sites
were also chosen because they are far from each other, and there isnt much contact
between the two, so these would give a good measure of language differences. Also,
these two particular villages have larger populations than others and therefore made
better subject sampling possible.
The population of Lushai in Bangladesh is small, and the only Lushai village in
Bangladesh is Mahmuam Para in the Ruilui area of Sajek union in Baghaichari
subdistrict, Rangamati. There are still fifteen families there, and they use their ownlanguage. Thus, a wordlist was collected from Mahmuam Para. Also, at the time of
collecting a Bawm wordlist in Bethel Para, we learned that there was an older
Lushai man living there who still can speak Lushai well, so a wordlist was also
elicited from him in order to get what could possibly be a pure Lushai wordlist.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
20/127
17
Discussions with Khyang leaders revealed that, among the Khyang, those who live in
hilly areas are called Kongtu and those who live in plains areas are called Laitu, and
there are some differences in words and pronunciation between these two groups
(Thoisafrue Khyang 2007, personal communication). To better understand the
amount of language difference between these two groups, Boro Kukyachari, which isin the hilly area of Rajasthali subdistrict in Rangamati district, and Ghungurumukh
Para, which is in the plains area of Bandarban Sadar subdistrict in Bandarban
district, were the two Khyang sites chosen.
According to two young, educated Khumi men, Khumi people in Rowangchari and
Ruma subdistricts of Bandarban district speak the same, but those in Thanci
subdistrict speak Khumi with different pronunciation and intonation (Thanghloi
Khumi and Shiong Khumi 2007, personal communication). To understand how
similar or different the Khumi varieties spoken in these areas are, one village from
Ruma subdistrict and one village from Thanci subdistrict were chosen even though
they were difficult to access. Also, to see how similar the Khumi of Myanmar and
that of Bangladesh are, a Myanmar Khumi wordlist collected by a linguist working
there was compared with the ten Kuki-Chin wordlists collected in Bangladesh.
Finally, a standard Bangla wordlist was compared with each of these wordlists.
The sociolinguistic questionnaire was used in eight villages with a total of 83 people.
Among them 11 were Pangkhua, 21 were Bawm, 10 were Lushai, 20 were Khyang,
and 21 were Khumi. In each village the questionnaire was asked of at least 10
people including both men and women, more-educated and less-educated people,
and people of varying ages. In Bethel Para the questionnaire was not asked of the
Lushai because, other than the one wordlist informant, there were no other Lushai
people. Similarly, the questionnaire was not used in the Pangkhua village of
Konglak because the people no longer consistently use Pangkhua as their mother
tongue and therefore do not speak Pangkhua well. The wordlist informant from
Konglak, however, said he still knows the Pangkhua language.
This sociolinguistic questionnaire was used to gain a better understanding of
Bangladeshs Kuki-Chin language varieties, speakers attitudes towards each others
language, intelligibility, language vitality, and bilingualism. Most of these issues are
covered in section 4 of this report, so a more detailed discussion of the
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
21/127
18
questionnaire sample is given in section 4.2. Demographic information on each
subject is given in appendix.(D.2) in the Bangla version of this report.
3.3. Results
Thus, a total of 10 wordlists from the five Bangladesh Kuki-Chin communities, aKhumi wordlist from Myanmar, and a Bangla wordlist are included in this report.
Lexical similarity between each pair of wordlists is given in figure 6. The letter in
parentheses is that villages code letter for the wordlists given in appendix. (A.3)
of the Bangla version of this report.
Figure 6: Lexical similarity chart
(a) Bilaichari
88 (l) Konglak
38 41 (i) Bethel Para
36 38 84 (b) Jamunachari
31 32 47 47 (j) Bethel Para
30 33 46 46 91 (m) Mahmuam Para
12 12 9 9 8 8 (c) Boro Kukyachari
10 10 8 8 8 7 78 (k) Ghungurumukh Para
8 8 8 8 7 8 11 11 (g) Manglung Headman Para
8 8 8 8 8 8 10 10 82 (h) Prongphung Para Khumi
7 7 8 8 8 9 9 8 68 72 (e) Myanmar
3 2 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 0 (0) Bangla
3.3.1. Pangkhua
The lexical similarity between the two Pangkhua wordlists is 88%, which indicates
there is not substantial difference within the Pangkhua language, especially
considering that these two Pangkhua villages are far apart and that speakers from
these two villages do not have regular contact with each other. Among the few
Pangkhua questionnaire subjects who said in reply to question 7a2 that there are
2 7a. Are there any (mother tongue) speakers who speak differently than you?
Pangkhua
Bawm
Lushai
Khyang
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
22/127
19
some Pangkhua who speak differently, all then replied to question 7d3 that, in spite
of these differences, they can understand all of this different type of Pangkhua.
In response to sociolinguistic questionnaire question 8 Among Bawm, Khumi,
Lushai, Khyang, Pangkhua, and Mro [name all but subjects mother tongue] which
one is easiest for you to understand?four Pangkhua subjects said Lushai is easiest
for them. Three of these four subjects were educated. Because the Pangkhua are
Christian and use Lushai language Christian literature, it is possible that these three
who are more educated understand Lushai better than those who are uneducated.
The other seven questionnaire subjects said Bawm is easiest for them to understand,
and five of these seven were uneducated. The Pangkhua in this area have regular
contact with the Bawm, so they have had good opportunity to use Bawm. It should
be noted that the questionnaire was asked only of Pangkhua living in Bilaichari. The
Pangkhua in Konglak can understand Lushai just as well as their own language
because they live near the Lushai and their languages are related.
3.3.2. Bawm
The Bawm wordlist from Jamunachari in Bilaichari subdistrict of Rangamati district
and the Bawm wordlist from Bethel Para in Ruma subdistrict of Bandarban district
have a lexical similarity of 84%. Even though these two villages are located in two
different districts with a lot of distance between them, still the lexical similarity is
fairly high. Based on this one lexical similarity figure alone, it is difficult to saywhether the people from these two villages use the same language. Thus, to try to
get a clearer understanding of this issue, the sociolinguistic questionnaire was used
with 21 people from these two villages. Of these 21 people 12 replied to question 7a
that there are regional differences in the Bawm language. It is worth mentioning
that 10 of these 12 subjects were from Jamunachari, and the other two were from
Bethel Para. Possibly because they live far from the main Bawm people group area,
those from Jamunachari are more aware of such regional differences. In response to
question 7d, however, each of these 12 people said that, although there are Bawm
people who speak differently than they do, they can understand all of these peoples
speech. Thus, although the lexical similarity percentage is not conclusively high, it
3 7d. When you speak with someone from (each of) these places, how much do you understand?
(little, half, most, all)
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
23/127
20
can be assumed from the questionnaire responses that, although they live far apart,
Bawm people from one area have good comprehension of the Bawm used in another
area.
Because the languages share some similarity, Bawm people can also understand
some Lushai. This seems to be especially true for the Bawm living in Bethel Para.
Among the 11 questionnaire subjects from Bethel Para, seven replied to question 8
that Lushai is the easiest Kuki-Chin language for them to understand. This does not
mean, however, that their understanding is sufficiently good to be able to use Lushai
literature. Among the 10 questionnaire subjects from Jamunachari, nine said
Pangkhua is the easiest Kuki-Chin language for them to understand because they
live near the Pangkhua community.
3.3.3. Lushai
The lexical similarity percentage between the two Lushai wordlists is greater than
that between any other two wordlists. The lexical similarity between the two
villages is 91%, and this in spite of the fact that the two villages are in two separate
districts and are very far from each other. Based on this similarity percentage it can
be said that the Lushai still use one language. The answers to question 7a of the
questionnaire support this: all 10 subjects from Mahmuam Para said there are no
Lushai speakers who speak differently than they do, and there is no place where
Lushai is spoken differently.
Because Pangkhua, Bawm, and Lushai all lie on the same branch of the Tibeto-
Burman language family, the lexical similarities among them are greater than they
are between other Kuki-Chin languages in Bangladesh. As is shown in figure 2, these
three languages are all classified as Kuki-Chin, Central languages. The lexical
similarity between Pangkhua and Bawm is 3641%, and that between Pangkhua
and Lushai is 3033%. Among these three languages the greatest lexical similarity is
found between Bawm and Lushai: 46%. These percentages are not high enough to
maintain that these are dialects of the same language, but the lexical similarities
among these three languages are still greater than any of the other lexical similarity
percentages. If speakers of these three languages have regular contact with each
other, they will be able to learn one anothers languages more easily than they could
learn the other Kuki-Chin languages.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
24/127
21
3.3.4. Khyang
The lexical similarity between the Khyang of Rajasthali and that of Bandarban is
78%. Although these wordlists are from the same people group, the lexical
similarity between them is less than the similarities between wordlists from each of
the above-mentioned groups. In addition, 17 of the 20 sociolinguistic questionnaire
subjects replied to question 7a that there are, in fact, some regional differences
within the Khyang language. For example, there are differences between the
language spoken by the Khyang who live in the hills and that spoken by the Khyang
who live on the plains. They call the Khyang who live in the hills Kongtu and
those who live in the plains Laitu. Of the two Khyang villages visited, the people
in Boro Kukyachari of Rajasthali are Kongtu and those in Ghungurumukh Para of
Bandarban are Laitu. Nearly all of the questionnaire subjects from Boro Kukyachari
said they are able to understand about halfof the plains area Laitu language. On theother hand, most of the Ghungurumukh Para subjects said they can understand most
of the hills area Kongtu language. This limited information lends itself to the
hypothesis that the plains area Khyang (the Laitu) can understand hills area Khyang
language (Kongtu) better than the hills area Khyang (the Kongtu) can understand
the language of the plains Khyang (Laitu). This data is not sufficient to be able to
say whether or not all of the Khyang in Bangladesh will be able to use the same
literature.
3.3.5. Khumi
The lexical similarity between the two Khumi wordlists from Ruma and Thanci
subdistricts of Bandarban district is 82%. That is to say, there is some difference
between the Khumi varieties spoken in these two areas. Community leaders had
mentioned that there are some differences between the words and the sounds of the
Khumi varieties spoken in Ruma and in Thanci. Also, a total of 21 subjects from
these two areas were asked the sociolinguistic questionnaire. Nineteen of the 21
subjects said in response to question 7a that there are differences in the way Khumi
is spoken, and they, too, especially mentioned differences between the variety
spoken in Ruma and that spoken in Thanci. Among the 19 subjects who mentioned
differences, 15 said they are able to understand mostof the speech of the other
variety.
The two Khumi wordlists collected in Bangladesh were also compared with a Khumi
wordlist collected in Myanmar. The wordlist from Myanmar was collected by a
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
25/127
22
linguist doing this same type of language research sometime after 2002 (Helga So-
Hartman 2008, personal communication). The list from Myanmar did not have all
the items in the 306-item wordlist used in this research, but there were enough of
the same items present that comparison was possible. The resulting lexical
similarities were 6872% similarity between Bangladesh Khumi and MyanmarKhumi.
While doing Kuki-Chin research in Bangladesh, some of us were privileged to sit in
on a conversation between a young Bangladesh Khumi man and a young Khumi
man who had just come into Bangladesh from Myanmar. These two Khumi men
from different countries talked quite easily with each other, and each could
reportedly understand all of the others speech. During this same meeting a small
portion of some Khumi literature published in Myanmar was read, and each Khumi
person who heard it said he could understand everything he had heard. Thus, it
seems likely that Khumi speakers in Bangladesh could use Khumi literature from
Myanmar either as it is or after some adaptation has been done.
In response to question 8 on the sociolinguistic questionnaire, most of the Lushai,
Khyang, and Khumi subjects said that no Kuki-Chin language other than their
mother tongue is even remotely easy for them to understand. Thus, it can be
assumed that people from these three communities cannot use literature in any
other Kuki-Chin language.
Although the above-mentioned languages are all classified as Kuki-Chin languages
within the Tibeto-Burman language family, they are not all of the same branch.
Thus, their lexical similarity is quite low. As was mentioned, the Pangkhua, Bawm,
and Lushai all belong to the central branch of Kuki-Chin languages. Within this
central branch there are no smaller branches. Thus, there is more lexical similarity
among these languages than between any of these and Khyang or Khumi. Khyang
and Khumi both belong to the southern branch of Kuki-Chin languages. The
southern branch, however, is further divided into smaller branches (see figure 2).
For example, Khyangalso known as Chin, Ashois part of the Sho branch of
Southern Kuki-Chin. Chin, Khumi is part of the Khumi branch along with Chin,
Khumi Awa. Thus, even though Khumi and Khyang are both Southern Kuki-Chin
languages, they are only 811% lexically similar because they are on different sub-
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
26/127
23
branches. This leads to a more detailed discussion on each communitys bilingualism,
which is explored in section 4.3.4.
Each of the above-mentioned Kuki-Chin languages was also compared with a Bangla
wordlist, but none of these languages has much lexical similarity with Bangla. Thelexical similarities between Bangla and the five Kuki-Chin languages in Bangladesh
are 13%. This indicates that there is minimal borrowing of Bangla words by
speakers of these Kuki-Chin languages.
4. Language Attitudes, Vitality, and Bilingualism Study
4.1. Procedures
A study of language attitudes is generally carried out in an effort to ascertain
peoples perceptions of the different speech varieties with which they have contact.
By studying how various languages are perceived, it is possible to get an idea of
how positive or negative people are towards their own language and towards other
language varieties. A sociolinguistic questionnaire was used to study language
attitudes. On this questionnaire there were five questions about language attitudes
(questions 13, 14a-b, and 15a-b).
A language vitality study was done in order to better understand whether children
of these people groups will speak that groups mother tongue in the future. This was
done by asking subjects which language they use in various domains, everyday
situations in which one language variety is considered more appropriate than
another (Fasold 1992). The vitality of a language is also understood by asking
questions such as, What language will the next generation of children speak?
What language do children speak best? Can children speak their mother tongue
well? What other languages can children speak? Questionnaire questions 3, 9,
10a-b, 11, and 12 are about language vitality.
Bilingualism refers to the ability of an individual or a group of people to use alanguage other than their mother tongue. There are several ways to study
bilingualism. For this Kuki-Chin research bilingualism was studied through
observation, through talking with various Kuki-Chin community members, and
through the questionnaire. Sociolinguistic questionnaire questions 2, 4, and 5 are
about bilingualism.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
27/127
24
Through the help of their own community members, most Kuki-Chin questionnaire
subjects were asked these questions in their mother tongue. Those who could speak
and understand Bangla well enough were asked the questions directly in Bangla.
The questions are in appendix . (B.1) and the responses are in appendix (C) of
the Bangla version of this report.
4.2. Discussion of sample
The sociolinguistic questionnaire was used with people in eight villages. It was not
used in Bethel Para with Lushai people or in Konglak with Pangkhua people. In each
of these two particular villages only a wordlist was collected. In Bethel Para there
are no Lushai people other than the wordlist informant, so it was not possible to use
the questionnaire there among the Lushai. In Konglak people other than the wordlist
informant no longer know the Pangkhua language well, so in this village, too, the
sociolinguistic questionnaire was not used. The researchers generally decided which
villages to visit after talking with various community leaders.
In each of the eight Kuki-Chin villages where the sociolinguistic questionnaire was
used, it was administered to at least 10 people. Among these 10 people there were
men and women, younger and older people, and more-educated and less-educated
people. Subjects whose ages were 1834 years old were considered younger, and
those whose ages were 35 years old or greater were considered older. Those who
had studied through less than class 8 were counted as less-educated, and thosewho had studied through class 8 or more were considered educated.
In each village where the sociolinguistic questionnaire was administered, the
researchers tried to ask the questionnaire of at least five people in each of those six
demographic categories mentioned. This, however, was not possible in every village.
For example, other than in the Bawm and Pangkhua villages, it was not possible to
find five educated people. This was particularly true for the Khumi village of
Manglung Headman Para, where not even one person who had studied through at
least class 8 could be found. In each of three other villages (the Khumi village of
Prongphung Para, the Khyang village of Boro Kukyachari, and the Lushai village of
Mahmuam Para), the questionnaire was administered to only two or three people
who had passed at least class 8. Finally, because there are few older people living in
Mahmuam Para, it was not possible to get a good balance of older and younger
questionnaire subjects.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
28/127
25
4.3. Results
The following discussion about Kuki-Chin speakers language attitudes, the vitality
of their languages, and bilingualism is based on responses to the sociolinguistic
questionnaire, the opinions of various community leaders, and the researchers
observations.
4.3.1. Language use
The first step in researching the language attitudes, vitality, and bilingualism of a
people group is to study what languages they use in various domains. There were
five questions about language use in the sociolinguistic questionnaire (questions 1a
d and 6). Following is a discussion about what languages Kuki-Chin speakers in
Bangladesh use in various domains. It should be mentioned that, because some
subjects said they use more than one language in a given domain, the sum of
percentages for some questions is greater than 100 percent.
Figure 7: Bangladesh Kuki-Chin community language use information chart
Key: MT = mother tongue
Question
Response
Community
What language do you
use most of the timePangkhua Bawm Lushai Khyang Khumi
at home? MT 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
with your MT
friends?MT 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
at church/ temple?
MT 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Bangla -- -- -- 10% 5%
Marma -- -- -- 40% 48%
Mro -- 5% -- -- --
with shopkeepers in
the market?
MT 9% 48% -- 50% 14%
Bangla 82% 95% 90% 90% 33%
Marma -- 38% -- 20% 76%other 9% -- 20% 5% 33%
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
29/127
26
Language used most of the time at home, with mother tongue friends, and at
church/temple
As is shown in figure 7, all the subjects from each Kuki-Chin community said they
use their mother tongue to communicate both at home and with friends from their
language group. The Pangkhua and the Lushai all said they use their mother tonguemost of the time at church, too. All of the Bawm subjects also said they use their
mother tongue at church although one Bawm preacher added that he uses his own
Bawm language when attending church with Bawm people but uses the Mro
language when preaching among people from the Mro community. All of these
responses indicate that the people from each of these three communities still use
their own language among themselves most of the time.
Each of these three communities is Christian, and people from other communities
generally do not attend their churches. Thus, they have good opportunity to use
their mother tongue most of the time. The Khyang and Khumi subjects also said
they use their mother tongue at home and with friends from their language group.
Among these subjects, however, nearly half said that at church or a temple they use
Marma along with their mother tongue. Interestingly, those Khyang subjects who
said they use Marma at church or the temple are all from Ghungurumukh Para. The
majority of people from this village are Buddhist. There are many Buddhists among
the Khumi, too, and the religious teachers for both Khyang and Khumi Buddhists are
Marma. Thus, along with their mother tongue, the Khyang and Khumi have to use
Marma. It is possible that, because of their religion, these peoples languages will be
increasingly influenced by Marma in the future.
Language used with shopkeepers in the market
Regarding language used with shopkeepers in the market, the fact of the matter is
that almost all Kuki-Chin people in Bangladesh use the language of the shopkeeper.
Thus, if the shopkeeper is Bengali, they use Bangla; if he is Marma, they use Marma;
and if he is from their own community, they use their own language. The
researchers of this report did notice that some Bengali shopkeepers who had lived in
the area for a long time had become quite competent in using Marma or Bawm, and
with these shopkeepers Kuki-Chin people speak Marma or Bawm.
Compared with the other Kuki-Chin communities, the situation of the Khumi is
different. Most people from Manglung Headman Para use Marma in the market
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
30/127
27
because the markets in their neighboring areas are in Marma areas, and most of the
shopkeepers are Marma. It is worth noting that none of the questionnaire subjects
from Manglung Headman Para said they use Bangla in the market. On the other
hand, of the 11 Khumi subjects from Prongphung Para, seven said they use Bangla
with shopkeepers, eight said they use Marma, and five said they use Bawm. Thus, ofall five Kuki-Chin communities, only the Khumi use Marma rather than Bangla in
the market most of the time.
Language used most in a typical week
There was one other question about language use on the sociolinguistic
questionnaire. It asked, In a typical week what language do you use the most? To
this question nearly all subjects replied that they use their mother tongue. This is
because in a normal week they are with people from their own language community
most of the time, and with their own people they use their mother tongue. One
Khyang and two Bawm preachers did say that for their preaching work they use
another language along with their mother tongue because they preach among
people groups other than their own. Another two Khyang subjects said they use
Bangla most of the time. Both of these subjects are teachers and they must use
Bangla for their work.
Although this language use research among the Kuki-Chin of Bangladesh is not very
comprehensive, the data does show that they still use their mother tongue whenever
possible. The data also shows that they often must use another language such as
Bangla, Marma, or Bawm when they go outside of their community. Especially the
Pangkhua, the Jamunachari Bawm, the Boro Kukyachari Khyang, and the Lushai use
Bangla in the market while the Khumi use Marma a lot in the market.
4.3.2. Language attitudes
Understanding language attitudes is another part of language research. Thus, the
sociolinguistic questionnaire has questions about language attitudes along with
questions about other topics. To gain a better understanding of the language
attitudes held by the various Kuki-Chin communities, the following question was
asked, What language should be used as the medium of education in primary
school? Responses from subjects from the five Kuki-Chin communities are given in
figure 8. Because some respondents gave more than one language name, the sum of
percentages for some communities is greater than 100 percent.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
31/127
28
Figure 8: Information about which language should be used as the medium of
education in primary school
CommunityResponse
mother tongue Bangla English
Pangkhua 9% (1/11) 82% (9/11) 9% (1/11)
Bawm 20% (4/20) 95% (19/20) 25% (5/20)
Lushai 20% (2/10) 50% (5/10) 50% (5/10)
Khyang 25% (5/20) 95% (19/20) --
Khumi 10% (2/21) 100% (21/21) --
As figure 8 shows, mostof the subjects from the Pangkhua, Bawm, and Khyang
communities said Bangla should be used as the medium of education in primary
school, and all of the Khumi subjects were of the opinion that Bangla should be used
in this situation. Some subjects gave reasons for their opinions, saying that Bangla is
the one language in Bangladesh that is used for education and that only Bangla can
be used in all situations. Thus, they said, to live a more developed life and to
accomplish positive change in life through education, there is no alternative to
learning Bangla.
Especially some of the Bawm and Khyang subjects were also of the opinion that
their mother tongue should be used as the medium of education in primary school.Among these subjects many said that in primary school the children should first be
taught in their mother tongue and then later be taught in Bangla.
Among the Lushai subjects one-half said Bangla and one-half said English should be
the medium of primary school education. Among those who said English should be
used, two people said their mother tongue should also be used alongside English to
teach their children. In explaining why they said English should be used, some of
the Lushai subjects said that this would be helpful for their childrens higher studies
in the future and also that this would help them become more developed.
All of the Khumi subjects said Bangla should be the medium of education in primary
school. Also, among the 21 Khumi subjects, two people said that their mother
tongue should be used as an education medium alongside Bangla so that the
children do not forget their mother tongue.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
32/127
29
Not a lot can be said based on this limited information, but it can be said that, other
than the Lushai, the majority of subjects from each of the other communities think
that because they live in Bangladesh, Bangla should be the medium of education in
primary school. Some subjects, however, did say their mother tongue should be
used alongside Bangla or English for giving teaching instruction at the primaryschool level.
In studying language attitudes, two sets of questions about a language education
program were asked along with the question mentioned about education medium.
The first set of questions was used only in villages where there was an existing
mother tongue class, and these questions asked about the success of the class.4 The
second set of questions was used in villages where there was not an existing mother
tongue class, and these questions asked subjects if they would send their children to
a multilingual education class and why.5
The first set of these two questions was asked only of the Bawm because only among
the Bawm is there already a mother tongue education program running. The second
set of questions was not asked of the Bawm because it was not applicable given that
they already have a language education program. Bawm community members
explained that the Bawm language education program is being run by their own
efforts and is successful because of community members cooperation. The result of
this language education program is that Bawm children can freely read literature in
their own language. Among the Kuki-Chin communities in Bangladesh, only the
Bawm are running their own education program, and this largely through their own
efforts. Though other factors are possible, this indicates the Bawm have a stronger
positive attitude towards their mother tongue than do the other communities.
Because there is not a mother tongue education program running among the
Pangkhua, the Lushai, the Khyang, or the Khumi, the second set of questions about a
language education program was asked of members of these communities. Each of
4 14a. I have been told there is a mother tongue literacy program here. Do you know any children
who go to these classes? 14b. If yes, how successful do you think these classes are?
5 15a. If your community leaders set up a class to teach young children first how to read and write in
their mother tongue and then how to read and write Bangla, would you send your children? 15b.
Why or why not?
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
33/127
30
the Khyang and Khumi subjects responded that they would send their children to
such a class. Of the 11 Pangkhua subjects eight said they would send their children,
two said they didnt know if they would send their children or not, and one said he
would not send his children, reasoning that they can learn their mother tongue at
home and therefore do not need such a class.
To this same question eight of the 10 Lushai subjects said they would send their
children to such a class, and two said they would not. One of these two said this
countrys provision for education is not good, so he will send his children to India
for school. The other subject who first said he wouldnt send his children to this
type of class then explained that if the class was good he would send them, but
otherwise he, too, would send his children to India for their education.
Those subjects who answered yes to this question were also asked why they wouldsend their children to such a class. A summary of their various reasons is given in
figure 9. The numbers in parentheses represent the number of subjects from each
community who answered yes to this question.
Figure 9: Reasons for sending children to mother tongue and Bangla classes
Key: MT = mother tongue
Reason
Response Rate
Pangkhua
(8)
Lushai
(8)
Khyang
(20)
Khumi
(21)
For education 38% 25% 15% 52%
For learning language 25% 50% 25% 33%
To preserve their MT -- -- 20% 14%
For their future development 13% -- 15% --
To learn Bangla well 13% 13% 5% --
To learn their MT 13% -- 10% --
For development of their MT -- -- 5% --
To be able to express their thoughts -- -- 5% --
Do not know -- 13% -- --
Figure 9 shows that most people from each community said they would send their
children to mother tongue and Bangla classes for reasons having to do with
education and learning language. Because the education rate among most of these
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
34/127
31
communities is very low, they have given importance to education of their children
and recognize that for good education to happen, the children must learn Bangla
along with their mother tongue.
Many subjects from each community also said they would send their children to this
type of class because their children will be able to learn Bangla along with their
mother tongue, and if they are able to learn Bangla along with their mother tongue,
they will be able to learn Bangla well, which will lead to improved lives for them.
Other subjects want to send their children to such classes because they think that
preserving their language is important and that this will be possible through this
type of education program.
This language attitudes data shows that nearly all of the communities questionnaire
subjects said the medium of education should be Bangla instead of their mothertongue and that half of the Lushai subjects said the education medium should be
Bangla, and half said it should be English. This does not, however, mean that these
communities have a negative attitude towards their mother tongues. Rather, for
practical reasons they advise using Bangla and to a lesser extent English for
education. Similarly, just as some of the subjects said it is important to preserve
their language, many also said it is imperative that Bangla be learned.
We researchers perceived a positive attitude among the Bawm towards their mother
tongue, for in each of their villages there is a mother tongue education center. For
the other four communities, however, information is too limited for us to say
whether their attitudes towards their mother tongues are positive or negative. They
did express interest in an education program that teaches their children to first learn
in their mother tongue and then in Bangla, but they do not have any such programs
at present nor did the researchers notice real interest in the community as a whole
in starting such a program. This could be due not only to language attitudes but also
to issues such as a groups economic position or a lack of information about how to
start such a program.
4.3.3. Language vitality
In addition to language use and language attitudes, language vitality was also
studied as part of this research. The vitality of a language is dependent upon
language use, especially upon the language use of children. Thus, to study language
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
35/127
32
vitality, some questions about childrens language use were included in the
sociolinguistic questionnaire. Questions 3 and 912 are about language vitality. A
summary of responses to most of these questions is given in figure 10.
Figure 10: Responses to language vitality questions
Abbreviations:
Subjects best language = 3. What language do you speak best?
Kids first language = 9. What language do children in your village speak first?
Kids best language = 11. What language do young people (age 10) in your village
speak best?
Other language before school = 10a. Before starting school, do many children in
your village speak any language besides your MT?
Which language = 10b. If yes, which one(s)?
MT = mother tongue
Community
Subjects
best
language
Kids
first
language
Kids
best
language
Other language before
schoolWhich
language
MT MT MT yes no dont know
Pangkhua 100% 100% 100% 18% 82% -- Bangla
Bawm 100% 100% 100% -- 95% 5% --
Lushai 100% 100% 100% -- 100% -- --
Khyang 100% 100% 100% -- 100% -- --
Khumi 100% 100% 100% -- 100% -- --
The information in figure 10 indicates that the Kuki-Chin communities of
Bangladesh are still able to speak their own languages well. Even their children
speak their mother tongue as their best language, and their mother tongue is the
language they use when they first start to speak. Also, most children cannot speak a
language besides their mother tongue before starting school. Out of all the
sociolinguistic questionnaire subjects, only two Pangkhua subjects said many
children from their village speak another language in this case Bangla before
starting school, and one of these subjects qualified his answer by saying they speak
a little Bangla.
In all of the communities that the researchers of this report have researched in the
past, never before has 100% of any communitys subjects said that they and their
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
36/127
33
communitys children speak their mother tongue as their best and first language.
This indicates that Bangladeshs Kuki-Chin languages are very vital.
One other question concerning language vitality was used in this study. Figure 11
displays the answers from the various communities.
Figure 11: Responses to one other language vitality question
Question 12: In about 30 years, when the children of this village grow up and have children
of their own, what language do you think those children will speak?
Key: MT = mother tongue
Community
Response
MT BanglaMT &
Bangla
Bangla &
English
MT &
English
dont
know
Pangkhua 100% -- -- -- -- --Bawm 76% 10% 5% 5% 5% --
Lushai 100% -- -- -- -- --
Khyang 75% 15% -- -- -- 10%
Khumi 38% 43% 5% -- -- 14%
In response to the above-mentioned question, each of the Pangkhua and Lushai
subjects said in the future their communitys children will speak their own language.
Among the Bawm and the Khyang mostof the subjects said their communitys future
generation of children will speak their mother tongue, but three Khyang subjects
(15%) and two Bawm subjects (10%) said that in the future children in their village
will speak Bangla, explaining that they would be educated in Bangla and would
therefore speak it. There was also one Bawm subject who said the children would
speak both Bawm and Bangla, another one who said they would speak Bangla and
English, and one other who said they would speak Bawm and English.
On this issue the Khumi community is somewhat of an exception. Khumi subjects
said they speak Khumi as their best language, and at present Khumi children speakKhumi as their best and first language. Still, almost half of the subjects (9 out of 21
subjects) said that in the future Khumi children will speak Bangla while nearly the
same number (8 out of 21 subjects) said future Khumi children will still speak
Khumi. Of those who said future Khumi children will speak Bangla rather than
Khumi, one subject went on to explain that they will do so because they will be
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
37/127
34
educated in Bangla. One other subject said the future generation of Khumi children
will speak both Khumi and Bangla.
In summary it can be said that, although some Kuki-Chin peoplemost notably nine
of the Khumi subjectsthink the future generation of children in their community
will speak Bangla instead of their own communitys language, it is highly unlikely
that the various Kuki-Chin languages of Bangladesh will be lost. This is because in
almost every community most of the members speak their own language among
themselves. The situation of the Lushai, however, is different in that the Lushai
language may no longer be used in Bangladesh in the not-too-distant future.
According to the headman of the one remaining area in Bangladesh where Lushai is
still used today, it is possible that some day the Lushai from that area will move to
India. In India, however, Lushai is a very vital language.
4.3.4. Bilingualism
Along with language use, attitudes, and vitality, bilingualism was a part of the
sociolinguistic research done among Bangladeshs Kuki-Chin communities. Three
questions on the questionnaire (questions 2, 4, and 5) were used to better
understand the bilingualism abilities of these various Kuki-Chin communities. A
discussion on the responses given to each of these three questions follows.
Figure 12: Responses to sociolinguistic questionnaire question 2
Question 2: What languages can you speak in addition to your mother tongue?
The information given in figure 12 shows that most subjects from each community
said they are able to speak a neighboring language along with Bangla. For example,
the Pangkhua subjects who are from Bilaichari Pangkhua Para live near Chakma
and Bawm communities and have regular contact with them. Because of this, many
of the Pangkhua subjects said they are able to speak Bawm and Chakma in addition
Commu-
nity
Responses
Bangla Marma Chakma Lushai MroBaw
m
Tri-
pura
Tang-
changya
Pang-
khua
Eng-
lishnone
Pangkhua 82% 9% 73% 82% -- 91% -- -- X -- --
Bawm 70% 62% 43% 57% 14% X 14% 14% 48% -- --
Lushai 100% -- 40% X -- -- 90% -- -- 10% --
Khyang 95% 80% 35% -- -- 25% 20% 15% 15% -- 5%
Khumi 62% 90% -- -- 38% 5% -- -- -- -- 10%
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
38/127
35
to their mother tongue. Additionally, 82% of the Pangkhua subjects said they can
speak Bangla. The same percentage of Pangkhua subjects also said they can speak
Lushai. The Pangkhua are Christian, but there is not Christian literature in their
language, so they use Lushai Christian books. Thus, although there are not Lushai
people living in Bilaichari, many Pangkhua people there can speak some Lushai.
People living in the two Bawm villages where this language research took place
have opportunity to use Bangla. Thus, 70% of the Bawm subjects said they are able
to speak Bangla in addition to their mother tongue. Also, because they live near
Marma communities and have regular contact with them, 62% of the Bawm subjects
said they can speak Marma. Because the Bawm from Jamunachari have neighbors
from several language communities, a few of the subjects from there said they can
speak Tripura and/or Tangchangya, all but one subject said they can speak Chakma,
and each of the Jamunachari subjects said they can speak Pangkhua. None of the
Bawm subjects from Bethel Para of Ruma subdistrict reported being able to speak
Tripura, Tangchangya, Chakma, or Pangkhua.
Figure 12 shows that 57% of the Bawm subjects said they can speak Lushai.
Although it is not regular, the Bawm do have contact with the Lushai and therefore
have some opportunity to speak Lushai. They are naturally able to understand
Lushai more easily than other languages because there is some similarity with their
language. Thus, more than half of the Bawm subjects said they can speak Lushai.
Each of the Lushai subjects said they can speak Bangla along with their mother
tongue. This is because when they go outside of their village or speak with people
from other communities, they must use Bangla. Therefore they, too, have had an
opportunity to use Bangla. The Lushai living in Mahmuam Para have Tripura
neighbors living close by and therefore hear and use the Tripura language most days.
Thus, 90% of the Lushai subjects said they can also speak Tripura. Finally, a few of
the Lushai subjects said they can speak a little Chakma.
The information given in figure 12 shows that, besides their mother tongue, most of
the Khyang can speak Bangla and Marma. This is because when the Khyang go
outside of their community, they often speak Bangla and Marma. In addition to
speaking these languages, many of the subjects from Boro Kukyachari in Rajasthali
said they can speak Chakma, Tripura, and/or Bawm. Thus it seems that the Khyang
living in the Rajasthali area can speak several languages to at least some extent.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
39/127
36
As was their language vitality situation, the bilingualism situation of the Khumi
community in Bangladesh is different from those of the other Kuki-Chin
communities. Compared with the other Kuki-Chin communities, the Khumi
communitys Bangla ability is low. This is probably because the Khumi live farther
from Bengali communities and have little communication with Bengalis and so donot have much opportunity to use Bangla. On the other hand most of the Khumi
subjects said they can speak Marma in addition to their mother tongue because
when they speak with people from other language communities in their area, they
use Marma more than Bangla or any other language. It should be noted that
Bandarban district of the Chittagong Hill Tracts is predominantly a Marma area.
Thus, Marma is used as a language of wider communication among most of the
indigenous peoples of Bandarban. Some of the Khumi subjects also said they can
speak Mro because they live near Mro communities. Finally, two older femalesubjects from Manglung Headman Para of Thanci district said they cant speak any
language other than their mother tongue because they do not have interaction with
people outside of the Khumi community.
Because the populations of these communities are small, speakers from them find
that in important situations they generally must use the languages of larger,
neighboring communities. Thus, although they may not be very fluent in these
neighboring languages, they are able to say what they need to when needed. People
from the various Kuki-Chin communities in Bangladesh speak not only some Bangla
but also neighboring minority languages. Different minority language groups live in
different geographical areas, and the various Kuki-Chin communities also live in
different areas. Thus, a communitys ability in a minority language is dependent on
where that community is located and who their neighbors are. One goal of this
Kuki-Chin research was to better understand how well Kuki-Chin speakers can
understand the languages mentioned. Discussion on this follows.
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
40/127
37
Figure 13: Responses to sociolinguistic questionnaire question 4
Question 4: What language do you speak second best (after your mother tongue)?
Commu-
nity
Responses
Bangla Bawm LushaiPang-
khua
Chakma MarmaTri-
pura
not
applicablePangkhua 36% 36% 18% X 9% -- -- --
Bawm 62% X 5% 24% -- 10% -- --
Lushai 50% -- X -- -- -- 50% --
Khyang 70% -- -- -- -- 25% -- 5%
Khumi 10% -- -- -- -- 81% -- 10%
The information in figure 13 shows that four Pangkhua subjects (36%) said they
speak Bangla as their second-best language. Each went on to say that they canalways say what they want to say in Bangla, and each of these four subjects was
educated. Four other Pangkhua subjects said Bawm is their second-best language,
but three of these four said that, although Bawm is their second-best language, they
cannot always say what they want to say in Bawm. The other one said he can
always say what he wants to say in Bawm. Also, none of these four subjects who
named Bawm as their second-best language had been educated up to class 8. This
data indicates that those Pangkhua who are educated have good bilingual ability in
Bangla, but the Pangkhua community as a whole does not have sufficient ability in
Bangla to be able to use Bangla literature. Two other Pangkhua subjects said that
they speak Lushai as their second-best language and that they can always say what
they want to say in Lushai. One other Pangkhua subject said her second-best
language is Chakma.
The discussion in the previous paragraph is about only those Pangkhua from
Bilaichari Pangkhua Para. It can be assumed that other Pangkhua villages in this
area have a more-or-less similar situation with regards to bilingualism. The situation
among the Pangkhua living in Sajek union of Baghaichari subdistrict in Rangamatidistrict, however, is different. There is not a lot of detailed information available,
but a little formal research, travels through that area, and conversations that the
author had with people from that area all indicate that this area is near the Mizoram,
India, border and that the Pangkhua living there have regular contact with the
Lushai of Mizoram. This and the fact that this area is separated from Bengali
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
41/127
38
communities indicate that the Pangkhua there speak Lushai much better than
Bangla. In fact the Pangkhua people from Konglak village in Sajek union no longer
use Pangkhua as their mother tongue but instead speak Lushai as their first
language.
Among the Bawm subjects 13 (62%) said Bangla is their second-best language. Four
of these 13 people are from Jamunachari, and each of these four said they could
always say what they wanted to say in Bangla, presumably because each of them is
educated. The other nine Bawm subjects who said Bangla is their second-best
language are from Bethel Para, and eight of these people said they cannotalways
say what they want to say in Bangla. The one subject who said he can always say
what he wants in Bangla is a health worker. It is assumed that because Bangla is
important for his work, he knows more Bangla than the other subjects. Two other
Bawm subjects said Marma is their second-best language, and one said Lushai is his
second-best language. Each of the two who named Marma said they had lived in
Marma areas for some time and therefore had the opportunity to learn and use
Marma. They each said they can always say what they want to say in Marma.
Five other Bawm subjects said they speak Pangkhua as their second-best language.
All of these subjects said they can always say what they want to say in Pangkhua,
and all are from Jamunachari Bawm Para. These peoples closest neighbors are
Pangkhua, they have regular contact with the Pangkhua, and they have opportunity
to use the Pangkhua language. In other areas where the Bawm live, however, there
are not Pangkhua people living nearby. Thus, in areas other than Jamunachari, the
Bawm do not know the Pangkhua language or at least do not speak it as their
second-best language. For the Bawm community as a whole, then, it can be
concluded that they are not sufficiently bilingual in Bangla, Marma, or Pangkhua.
Among the Lushai subjects five (50%) named Bangla as their second-best language,
and five others (50%) named Tripura. Of the five who named Bangla, four said they
are always able to say what they want to say in Bangla. The population of theLushai in Bangladesh is very small, and, other than with their closest neighbors, the
Tripura, they have to use Bangla to speak with other people in most situations.
Perhaps for these reasons these people speak Bangla as their second-best language.
In spite of the fact that half of the subjects said Bangla is their second-best language,
the researchers had to use the help of a translator to speak with many of them
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
42/127
39
because they could not directly understand the researchers Bangla. Thus it can be
assumed that this level of Bangla ability is not sufficient to understand Bangla
literature or to maintain a conversation in Bangla.
Of the five Lushai subjects who named Tripura as their second-best language, four
said they can always say what they want to say in Tripura. This is because the
neighbors living closest to the Lushai in Mahmuam Para are Tripura, and the
population of the Tripura is greater than that of the Lushai. Thus, the Lushai must
learn Tripura in order to be able to have regular interaction with their Tripura
neighbors. The result is that they are able to speak Tripura along with their mother
tongue. It seems, therefore, that a Lushai persons second-best language is
dependent upon whom they have the most regular contact with and upon who their
neighbors are.
Seventy percent of the Khyang subjects named Bangla as their second-best language,
and among these subjects most (86%) said they can always say what they want to
say in Bangla. In spite of these responses, it is suspected that the Bangla ability of
the Khyang as a community is not as great as that of some other communities. They
usually use Bangla only for simple chatting and cannot speak about or understand
deep topics in Bangla. Notably, many people had difficulty understanding the
language used in this researchs sociolinguistic questionnaire.
Some Khyang can also speak Marma. This is because the Marma live near some of
them, some have regular contact with the Marma, and some share a religion with
the Marma. Thus, five of the Khyang subjects (25%) said Marma is their second-best
language, and three of these people said they can always say what they want to say
in Marma. The other twowho said they cannotalways say what they want to say
in Marma even though it is their second-best languageare older women who stay
at home most of the time and therefore have little opportunity to use Marma. One
other Khyang subject said she doesnt speak any language other than Khyang, so this
question was not applicable for her.
Of all the Kuki-Chin communities in Bangladesh, the education rate of the Khumi is
the lowest. Between the two Khumi villages where research was done, only two
people who had been educated through at least class 8 could be found, and both of
these people were young men. Furthermore, only these two men named Bangla as
their second-best language. They said they can always say what they want to say in
7/28/2019 The Kuki-Chin Communities of Bangladesh.pdf
43/127
40
Bangla because during their school years each of them stayed with other students
from a mix of ethnic communities and there had a lot of opportunity to use Bangla.
Another 17 of the Khumi subjects (81%) said Marma is their second-best language.
Nine out of these 17 subjects said they can always say what they want to say in
Marma because they have to use Marma in many situations. The other eight subjects
who named Marma as their second-best language cannot always say what they want
to say in Marma, and of these eight people seven are from Manglung Headman Para.
People from this village generally do not go out much and therefore have little
contact with people from other communities and little opportunity to use Marma or
any other second language. Thus, although Marma is their second-best language,
they do not have strong bilingual ability in Marma. Two Khumi women who were
both over 40 years old said they cannot speak any language other than their mother
tongue. Thus, question 4 would not be applicable for them and therefore was not
asked of them.
In conclusion, the Kuki-Chin people of Bangladesh speak their own language as their
best language, and after that they can speak Bangla and also some neighboring
languages. They especially find that they must learn the languages of neighboring
communities who have a greater population than their own or whose language is
used as a language of wider communication in the area. Thus, people from the same
language community who live in two different areas may be able to speak different
languages. Although they can speak various neighboring languages, no community
has sufficient ability in any given neighboring language to be able to understand
literature in that l
Recommended