View
214
Download
2
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
The Globalization Process: The Globalization Process: Advancing Capabilities in Advancing Capabilities in
Chinese and Indian Chinese and Indian ManufacturingManufacturing
SourcesSources
Sutton, Quality,Trade and the Sutton, Quality,Trade and the ‘Moving Window’, Economic Journal , ‘Moving Window’, Economic Journal , Nov 2007Nov 2007
Brandt, Rawski, Sutton, China’s Brandt, Rawski, Sutton, China’s Industrial Development, in pressIndustrial Development, in press
Sutton, The auto-component industry Sutton, The auto-component industry in China and India: A Benchmarking in China and India: A Benchmarking Study Study
The “Capability” ConceptThe “Capability” Concept
At one level, this is a straightforward At one level, this is a straightforward generalisation of the standard generalisation of the standard concept of productivity.concept of productivity.
The “Capability” ConceptThe “Capability” Concept
At a deeper level it involvesAt a deeper level it involves
(a) relating the capability of the firm (a) relating the capability of the firm to the know-how of individual to the know-how of individual workers.workers.
(b) Analysing the decision of the firm (b) Analysing the decision of the firm to invest in capability building …… to invest in capability building …… what is of central interest here is that what is of central interest here is that this decision takes place in a climate this decision takes place in a climate of true (Knightian) uncertainty.of true (Knightian) uncertainty.
Capabilitiesd
dc
u c = ‘productivity’
u = ‘quality’
Capability is a pair (c, u) for each technical trajectory (submarket)
xu
(Quality)
1/c (Productivity)
x
u/c = bu/c = ax
Competing in Capabilities
Key feature:Key feature:
The consumers choose products offering the The consumers choose products offering the best u/pbest u/p
Implication: if u>v, the market share of a firm Implication: if u>v, the market share of a firm offering u cannot be eroded to zero by any offering u cannot be eroded to zero by any number of firms offering v number of firms offering v
Proposition 1
- given any configuration of capabilities
(c1,u1), (c2,u2) . . (cn,un)
there is a lower bound in (c,u) space below which a firm cannot achieve positive sales at equilibrium
(ex. Cournot equilibrium)
c
ucuF ),(
Proposition 2
Suppose one element in building capability is the expenditure of fixed outlays (“sunk costs”)
- Then competition in ‘capability building’ will lead to a bound on the number of firms ‘in the window’.
Two Polar Patterns
PROLIFERATION
Flowmeters
ESCALATION
Aircraft
σLinkages Across Submarkets
β
Effectiveness of Capability
Building
Flow meters
Large Commercial Jets
Numerical controls
Machine Tools
Cement
σ Linkages Across Submarkets
Low concentrationWide Window
Low R&D intensity
Low Concentration
Wide Window
High R&D intensity
High Concentration
Narrow Window High R&D
intensity
β
Effectiveness of Capability
Building
Capabilities and TradeCapabilities and Trade
Key Point: BKey Point: Breakdown of equivalence reakdown of equivalence between productivity and qualitybetween productivity and quality
(Sutton EJ 2007)(Sutton EJ 2007) Idea: once a tradeable input Idea: once a tradeable input
(Component, Raw material, etc.) is (Component, Raw material, etc.) is used, it sets a lower bound to used, it sets a lower bound to price, so low wages can offset low price, so low wages can offset low productivity, but not low qualityproductivity, but not low quality
The Globalization ProcessThe Globalization Process
Phase I: Impact phase…Capabilities Phase I: Impact phase…Capabilities givengiven
Phase II: Transfer phasePhase II: Transfer phase
Phase III: Re-investment (escalation) Phase III: Re-investment (escalation) phasephase
Main substantive argumentMain substantive argument
The case for globalisation should rest The case for globalisation should rest primarily on the transfer and growth of primarily on the transfer and growth of capabilities it inducescapabilities it induces
A fundamental set of mechanisms are A fundamental set of mechanisms are driven by the coexistence of high driven by the coexistence of high capabilities and low wagescapabilities and low wages
These mechanisms include, inter alia, These mechanisms include, inter alia, ---self help driven by new incentives---self help driven by new incentives ---Transfers via FDI/ Supply chains, etc.---Transfers via FDI/ Supply chains, etc.
Going it AloneGoing it Alone
The Bharat Forge storyThe Bharat Forge story
Increasingly difficult as we move Increasingly difficult as we move across industrial spectrumacross industrial spectrum
The Speed of TransferThe Speed of Transfer
- Delicately dependent on industry Delicately dependent on industry characteristicscharacteristics
- Key channels differ by industryKey channels differ by industry
(a) Buyer search channel: Textiles(a) Buyer search channel: Textiles
(b) Trade Fairs: Ubiquitous(b) Trade Fairs: Ubiquitous
(c) Supply chains: Vertical Transfers(c) Supply chains: Vertical Transfers
The Evidence on “FDI Spillovers”The Evidence on “FDI Spillovers”
Speed of TransmissionSpeed of Transmission
FASTFASTAuto components: Vertical relations Auto components: Vertical relations
with shared technology; with shared technology; standardization and standardization and
codification of working codification of working practices. practices.Domestic Appliances: Horizontal JVs – here Domestic Appliances: Horizontal JVs – here
incentives of senior incentives of senior partner are critical (cf. partner are critical (cf. China). China).
Machine Tools:Machine Tools: Licencing;Public sector Licencing;Public sector bodies .bodies .
SLOW SLOW
Industry Specific influencesIndustry Specific influences
Textiles and apparel..Contact with Textiles and apparel..Contact with Buyers(Ever Glory)Buyers(Ever Glory)
Steel: Equipment Steel: Equipment Suppliers(Shougang)Suppliers(Shougang)
Changing Market StructuresChanging Market Structures
Escalation and Shakeout : Chinese Escalation and Shakeout : Chinese White Goods ; Beer White Goods ; Beer
Market Share VolatilityMarket Share Volatility
Changing Leadership : Chinese TVsChanging Leadership : Chinese TVs
A Tale of Two Industries :I Auto A Tale of Two Industries :I Auto ComponentsComponents
… …Globally integratedGlobally integrated … … Capabilities codifiedCapabilities codified ...Supply Chain aligns incentives ...Supply Chain aligns incentives
Figure 16. Car Production in India and China 1993-2001
Note: Indian figures for fiscal year ’93-’94 are shown here as ’93, etc.
Car Production
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01
mill
ion
/yr
India
China
Component Suppliers to Multi-National Car Makers
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
India
China
Component Suppliers to Steering Gear Firms
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
<1% 1-10% 10-20% 20-40% >40%
India
China
A Timescale for Capability A Timescale for Capability BuildingBuilding
A multinational seat maker on a A multinational seat maker on a greenfield site in India drops from greenfield site in India drops from initial 2,085 ppm to 65 ppm in year initial 2,085 ppm to 65 ppm in year 3.3.
A domestic Indian seat maker drops A domestic Indian seat maker drops from 20,000 ppm to 200 ppm over 5 from 20,000 ppm to 200 ppm over 5 years.years.
Greenfield vs. Joint VentureGreenfield vs. Joint Venture
The Mahindra Story
II : Machine ToolsII : Machine Tools
Globally FragmentedGlobally Fragmented Supply Chain plays no roleSupply Chain plays no role Bilateral licencing deals Bilateral licencing deals Some successful collaborationsSome successful collaborations Huge loss of position by Indian Huge loss of position by Indian
leadersleaders Chinese experience mixedChinese experience mixed
CNC Machine ToolsCNC Machine Tools
The Invidious Trade-Off
controls
ball-screws
15% wages
Bought-in Components
Materials, Energy costs,
etc.
15%
15%
55%
A typical cost breakdown
Gross Labour Productivity
3-axis, 15 kW
7.5 kW,165mm
11 kW,350mm
0.25 1 4
size
& c
om
ple
xity
Japan
India Taiwan
Design staff (% of employees) Design staff (no. of employees)
5 10 15 20
India*
Taiwan
Japan
10 100 1000
India*
Taiwan
Japan
Figure 3. The size of design teams as a proportion of total firm employment (Panel a) and in terms of the number of employees (Panel b).
*For India the HMT company is excluded from this comparison.
0
5
10
15
20
25
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
Figure 5. Difference in general satisfaction with machine (1-5 rating) (Indian-Foreign). In this and subsequent figures, outcomes favourable to the Indian Machine are shown in green, and those favourable to the foreign machine re shown in red.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
>-8 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 <10
Figure 7. Difference in % lost hours due to breakdown/no of machine hours booked. (Indian-Foreign)
ACE Designers ACE Designers
Small new entrantSmall new entrant Understands importance of quality/ Understands importance of quality/
price nexusprice nexus Focus on building capability in one Focus on building capability in one
core productcore product
China in Machine ToolsChina in Machine Tools
Now exporting basic CNC machinesNow exporting basic CNC machines
Serious challenges to capability Serious challenges to capability buildingbuilding
OECD PerspectivesOECD Perspectives
The Bernard – Schott EvidenceThe Bernard – Schott Evidence
Survival and FlexibilitySurvival and Flexibility
The European Debate and ‘Social The European Debate and ‘Social Europe’Europe’
Unfortunate ConfusionsUnfortunate Confusions
Recommended