The Five Basic Institutions Five Basic Tasks

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

The Five Basic Institutions Five Basic Tasks. Instrumental. Government. Market. School. Church. Family. Relational. Buildings Reflect Society’s Fundamental Tasks. Government. Market. Church. School. Family. Fundamental Needs Of Society. Safety & Justice. Material Goods. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

The Five Basic InstitutionsFive Basic Tasks

Church

Family

School

Government Market

Instrumental

Relational

Buildings ReflectSociety’s Fundamental

Tasks

Church

Family

School

Government Market

Fundamental NeedsOf Society

Goodness& MeaningTo Mate

& Produce the Next Generation

To Know

Safety& Justice Material Goods

Fundamental Capacities

ReflectionSexuality

Intelligence

Force / Benevolence

Work

Fundamental TasksOf the Individual

ChurchFamily

SchoolGov Market

Fundamental TasksOf the Couple

ChurchFamilySchool

Gov MarketChurchFamily

SchoolGov Market

Fundamental TasksOf the Family

ChurchFamilySchool

Gov MarketChurchFamily

SchoolGov Market

ChurchFamilySchool

Gov Market

Fundamental TasksOf Society

ChurchFamily

SchoolGov Market

ChurchFamilySchool

Gov Market

ChurchFamily

SchoolGov Market

ChurchFamilySchool

Gov Market

Belonging: Male + Female

FamilyChild / Adult

Father Mother

Society At Large

Father MotherCONCEPTION

EARLY CHILDHOOD

MID CHILDHOOD

EARLY TEENS

LATE TEENS

YOUNG ADULT

BIRTH + INFANCY

Family

Church School

MarketplaceGovernment

The Intact Family that Worships

Family

Church School

MarketplaceGovernment

The Broken Family, No Worship

Father Mother

Fundamental Tasks of Society

Well Functioning Society

Society Diminished

The Non-ThrivingMarriage / Child Relationship

Society’s Foundational Relationship

Annual Rejection Ratio: For Every 100 Children Born Sources: CDC/ NCHS report series

0.0

60

40

20

10

1950

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

1998

2000

Divorce

OWB

Belonging Rejection0

10

20

30

40

50

6045.4

54.6

Belonging and Rejection Ratio for the US, 2008

Source: American Community Survey, 2008

U.S. Black American Indian & Alaskan Native

Hispanic White Asian0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

45.4%

17.4%23.8%

40.2%

53.8%62.0%

Index of Belonging, Ethnic GroupsSource: American Community Survey, 2008

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

16 32 34 37 37 38 39 39 40 40 40 41 42 42 42 42 42 42 43 43 43 44 45 45 45 45 45 46 46 47 47 47 47 48 48 48 49 49 49 49 49 50 52 52 53 54 54 55 55 57 58 59

DC

MS

LA

AR

AL

GA

SC

TN

NM

OK

FL

NV

AZ

KY

WV

MO

NC

DE

SD

MD

IN

OR

AK

MI

RI

TX

US

HI

CA

WA

VA

OH

WY

ME

KS

VT

CT

IL

NY

CO

PA

WI

MT

ID

ND

MA

IA

NE

NJ

MN

NH

UT

Index of Belonging for the States

Source: Pat Fagan; MARRI

International Rejection RatioSource: Pat Fagan; MARRI

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Taiwan

China

Macedo

nia

Croatia

Japan

New Zeal

and

Serbia

and M

onten

egro

Switzerl

and

Slovak

ia

Portug

al

Netherl

ands

Georgi

a

Lithua

nia

Sloven

ia

Czech R

epub

lic

Canad

a

United

States

Finlan

d

France

New C

alced

onia

Denmark

Sweden

El Salv

ador

Urugua

y

Jamaic

a

U

S

A

Belonging: Male + Female

FamilyChild / Adult

Father Mother

Society At Large

Mother's First Marriage (Intact)48%

Mother Re-Married14%

Mother Divorced14%

Mother Cohabiting

3%

Mother Always Single

6%

Mother Widowed

1%

Parented by

Grand-parent

2%

Parented by Relative

2%

Parents absent; Roomer/Boarder

1%

Parents absent; In-stitutional-

ized0% No Mother Found

7%

Mother's First Marriage (Intact)Mother Re-MarriedMother DivorcedMother CohabitingMother Always SingleMother WidowedParented by GrandparentParented by RelativeParents absent; Roomer/BoarderParents absent; InstitutionalizedNo Mother Found

Family Structure of Girls Aged 15 to 17

Source: American Community Survey, 2008 through 2011; MARRI

Fundamental Institution: School

SchoolNeed: Know & UnderstandCapacity: IntellectTask: Learn & Teach Strength: Truth & Tenacity

School

Doctoral Degree

Professional Degree

Master's Degree

Bachelor's Degree

Associate's Degree

Some College

High School Graduate

Not High School Graduate

0 1 2 3 4 5$3.4

$4.4

$2.5

$2.1

$1.6

$1.5

$1.2

$1.0

Educational Attainment / Life Earnings (in millions)

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Popu-lation Surveys, March 1998, 1999, and 2000

Intact Step Cohabit (Both

Natural)

Cohabit (One

Natural)

Divorced Never Married

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.92.9

2.6 2.6

2.52.6

2.5

GPA English/Math by Family StructureSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I.

Adolescents grade 7-12

Aver

age

GPA

Enlig

sh/M

ath

Com

bine

d

Intac

t Marr

ied Fa

mily

Divorce

d Fam

ily

Single

Nev

er Marr

ied M

other

Family

01234

11.9

4.3

School ExpulsionSource: Add Health Wave II, 1996

Perc

ent E

ver E

xpel

led

First Marriage45%

Re-Married7%

Di-vorced10%

Cohabiting12%

Always Single25%

Widowed0%

Family Structure of Men Aged 35 to 40 Who Dropped Out of High School

American Community Survey 2008 through 2011; MARRI

First MarriageRe-MarriedDivorcedCohabitingAlways SingleWidowed

First Marriage45%

Re-Married9%

Di-vorced15%

Co-habit-

ing10%

Al-ways Single20%

Widowed1%

Family Structure of Women Aged 35 to 40 Who Dropped Out of High School

American Community Survey 2008 through 2011; MARRI First Marriage

Re-MarriedDivorcedCohabitingAlways SingleWidowed

First Marriage71%

Re-Married6%

Divorced5%

Cohabit-ing5%

Always Single14%

Widowed0%

Family Structure of Men Aged 35 to 40 Who Earned a

Professional Graduate Degree American Community Survey 2008 through

2011; MARRI First MarriageRe-MarriedDivorcedCohabitingAlways SingleWidowed

First Marriage65%

Re-Married8%

Divorced8%

Cohabiting4%

Always Single15% Widowed

0%

Family Structure of Women Aged 35 to 40 Who Earned a Professional Graduate Degree

American Community Survey 2008 through 2011; MARRI

First MarriageRe-MarriedDivorcedCohabitingAlways SingleWidowed

Educational AttainmentIdeal

Educational Attainment

Fundamental Institution: Marketplace

MarketplaceNeed: MaterialCapacity: Work & Save Task: Produce & Exchange Habit: Work & Honesty

Marketplace

Married

Always

Intac

t

Married

Step

Cohab

itatin

g Inta

ct

Cohab

itatin

g Step

Sepa

rated

Divorce

d

Widowed

Never M

arried

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000 $82,270

$65,816

$28,794 $45,248

$28,794 $37,021

$45,248

$16,454

Median Income of Households with Children by Family Structure, 2009

Source: Survery of Consumer Finance, 2007

Family Type

Medi

an In

com

e

Widowed

Never M

arried

Sepa

rated

Divorce

d

Living

w Partn

er

Secon

d(+) M

arriag

e

First

Marriag

e0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

1128 1279 1620 1891 1835 2135 2213

13911384 1199

Axis Title

Axis

Title

Spouse; Partner

Head of Household

Average Hours Worked Per Year

Source: Survey of Consumer Finance, 2000

34123519

3227

Married

Alway

s Int

act

Married

Step

Coha

biting

Intac

t

Coha

biting

Step

Sepa

rated

Divorce

d

Widowed

Never

Married

$0$100,000$200,000$300,000$400,000$500,000$600,000$546,944

$309,963

$99,494$90,506$57,180

$179,651

$337,997

$25,220

Average Net Worth of Households with Children by Family Structure

Source: Henry Potrykus; MARRI

Family Type

Aver

age

Net W

orth

First

Marriag

e

Seco

nd(+

) Marr

iage

Divorce

d

Coha

bitati

on

Sepa

rated

Never

Married

010203040506070

12 13

3139 41

67

Children in Poverty, 2000Source: CPS, 2002; Robert Rector, Heritage

Foundation

Perc

ent i

n Po

verty

Mother's First Mar-riage (Intact)

24%

Mother Re-Married7%

Mother Divorced22%

Mother Cohabiting6%

Mother Always Single16%

Mother Widowed2%

Parented by Grandparent

3%

Parented by Rela-tive4%

Parents absent; Roomer/Boarder

5%

No Mother Found11%

Family Structure of Teenagers Aged 15 to 17 Who Live Below the Poverty Line

American Community Survey 2008 through 2011; MARRI

Mother's First Marriage (Intact)Mother Re-MarriedMother DivorcedMother CohabitingMother Always SingleMother WidowedParented by GrandparentParented by RelativeParents absent; Roomer/BoarderParents absent; InstitutionalizedNo Mother Found

Mother's First Mar-riage (Intact)

26%

Mother Re-Married11%

Mother Divorced18%

Mother Cohabiting4%

Mother Always Single14%

Mother Widowed2%

Parented by Grandparent

4%

Parented by Rela-tive7%

Parents absent; Roomer/Boarder

4%

Parents absent; Institutionalized

1%

No Mother Found10%

Family Structure of Unmarried Girls Aged 15 to 17 Who Had an Out of Wedlock Birth in the

Past Year American Community Survey 2008 through

2011; MARRI Mother's First Marriage (Intact)Mother Re-MarriedMother DivorcedMother CohabitingMother Always SingleMother WidowedParented by GrandparentParented by RelativeParents absent; Roomer/BoarderParents absent; InstitutionalizedNo Mother Found

3.93 Million Children 3.17 Million Children

0.75 Million Children

Unmarried Parents Same Parents Married

Children in PovertySource: R Rector Analysis of CPS, 2001

In Poverty

Out of Poverty

Average Unmarried

Male

Premium Average Married Male

$0$20$40$60$80

$100$120$140 $100

+ $27 =

$127

Marriage Premium in Male Income Source: Antovics, K. & Town, R. Am Econ

Review V 94, (2004) pp 317-321

Com

para

tive

Inco

me

%

% “Unskilled” Not WorkingUS Total (Males) 1982-2010

Source: Derived from Bureau of Labor Statistics, CPS; Henry Potrykus, MARRI

single

single

cohab

cohab

married

married

% Professional Class Not WorkingUS Total (Males) 1982-2010

Source: Derived from Bureau of Labor Statistics, CPS; Henry Potrykus, MARRI

singlecohabmarried

Unemployed

Fraction of Occupatio

nClass single

cohab

married

Retreat from Marriage: Black Men (25-54)

by Education Level 1970-2010Source: Derived from Bureau of Labor Statistics, CPS; Henry Potrykus, MARRI

Retreat from Marriage:Black Men (25-54)

Unemployment DifferentialsSource: Derived from Bureau of Labor Statistics, CPS; Henry Potrykus, MARRI

Marriage (Red) and non-Marriage (blue)

Proportion of MarriedHeads of Households 1960-1990

Source: Derived from U.S. Census Long Form and CDC data; Henry Potrykus, MARRI

Growth in Productivity: DownSource: Derived from U.S. Census Long Form; Henry Potrykus, MARRI

MARRIED

DIVORCED

SINGLE

Before Divorce After Divorce$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000$54,000

$32,000

Average Impact of Divorce on the Income of Households with Children

Source: Pat Fagan; MARRI (research averag-ing)

40%Drop

Income: Economy

$$$

Income WithoutFamily Economy

Government

Fundamental Institution:Government

GovernmentNeed: Protection & SafetyCapacity: Force & Law Task: Common Good Virtue: Justice & Goodwill

01.5

3 12.07 2.71

3.7

Family Structure: Comparative Rates Of Youth Incarceration

Source: C. Harper and S. McLanahan, “Fa-ther Absence and Youth Incarceration,” ASA

Annual Meeting, San Francisco, August 1998. Data from the National Longitudinal

Survey of Youth

Com

para

tive

Rate

s of

Inca

rcer

atio

n

Intac

t Marr

ied Fa

mily

Divorce

d Fam

ily

Single

Nev

er Marr

ied M

other

Family

02468

2.85.2

7.5

Adolescent Cocaine Use By Family Structure Source: Ad Health Wave II, 1996

Perc

ent U

sing

Coca

ine

Step-Families

One-Parent Families

Two-Parent Families

0 5 10 15 20 25

21%

13%

7%

Runaway Children in UKSource: Safe on the Streets Research Team, 1999; Still Running: Children on the Streets

in the UK, The Children’s Society

Percentage of children running away overnight be-fore the age of 16

Alway

s Int

act M

arrie

d Fam

ily

Single

Paren

t Fam

ily

Not Liv

ing W

ith Ei

ther

Paren

t

Intac

t Coh

abitin

g Fam

ily

Step

Marr

ied Fa

mily

Step

Coha

biting

Family

02468

1012

13.1 3.6 4.3 5.2

10.3

Relative Rates of Physical Abuse by Family Structure

Source: NIS-4, 2010

02468

101214161820

1

4.8 5

8.610.6

19.8

Relative Rates of Sexual Abuse by Family Structure

Source: NIS-4, 2010

Married Widowed Married+Div+Sep Combined

Never Married05

101520253035

4 6

15

33

U.S: Partner / Spouse Violence Against Mothers Over 20 With Children un-

der 12 Source: DOJ Nat Crime Victimization Survey,

1999

Rate

per

1,0

00

Good Law and Order

Diminished Law and Order

Fundamental Institution: Church

ChurchNeed: Good vs. Evil, & God

Capacity: Reflection

Task: Worship & Prayer

Habit: Piety & Repentance

Church

Weekly Monthly+ <Monthly Never2.452.5

2.552.6

2.652.7

2.752.8

2.852.9

2.9

2.8

2.7

2.6

GPA (English & Math) by Religious PracticeSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I.

Adolescents grade 7-12

Aver

age

GPA

Enlig

sh/M

ath

Com

bine

d

Weekly+ Monthly+ <Monthly Never0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

6.4%7.3%

10.3%

11.5%

Running Away by Church AttendanceSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I.

Adolescents grade 7-12

Perc

ent W

ho H

ad E

ver R

un A

way

Weekly+ Monthly+ <Monthly Never0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

19.1%

31.9%

39.3%35.2%

Times Drunk by Church AttendanceSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I.

Adolescents grade 7-12

Weekly+ Monthly+ <Monthly Never0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%18%

7.72%

11.22%

16.22%

17.99%

Hard Drugs / Church AttendanceSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I.

Adolescents grade 7-12

Perc

ent W

ho H

ave

Used

Har

d Dr

ugs

WEEKLY+ MONTHLY+ <MONTHLY NEVER0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

0.61

0.92

1.411.55

Girls: Number of Sex Partners / Church Atten-dance

Source: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Ado-lescents grade 7-12

Num

ber o

f Sex

Par

tner

s

11.91%

11.14%

37.33%

39.62%

Current Church Attendance of Women Over 25 With No Chil-

dren in HH Who Ever Had Abortion

Source: NSFG, 2006-2010; Pat Fagan, MARRI

At least weeklyAt least monthlyAt least yearlyNever

21.62%

18.63%33.93%

25.82%

Current Church Attendance of Women Over 25 With Children in

HH Who Ever Had AbortionSource: NSFG, 2006-2010; Pat

Fagan, MARRI At least weeklyAt least monthlyAt least yearlyNever

Ideal Impact of Worship

Impact of Lessened Worship

Fundamental Institution: Family

FamilyNeed: The Future

Capacity: Sex & Affection

Task: Procreation

Strength: Chastity & Kindness

Family

0 1 2 3 4 5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21+0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80 80

54

44 39 42

30 29 30

18 20

Number of Non-Marital Sexual Partners Versus Percent in an Intact Marriage

Source: NSFG, 1995

Number of Nonmarital Sexual Partners

Perc

ent i

n a

Stab

le M

arria

ge (5

+Yea

rs)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11+ Total0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100% 94%

64%51% 55% 53% 51% 51% 47%

53% 51%38%

62%

Percent Sexually Active WomenStill Living With Spouse of First Marriage

by Number Sexual PartnersSource: NSFG, 2006-2010

Number of Sexual PartnersPerc

ent o

f Sex

ually

Act

ive W

omen

Stil

l Livi

ng

with

Spo

use

of F

irst M

arria

ge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11+ Total0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100% 97%

84%78%

68%55%

77%68% 70%

23%

61%55%

69%

Percent Sexually Active MenStill Living With Spouse of First Marriage

by Number Sexual PartnersSource: NSFG, 2006-2010

Number of Sexual PartnersPerc

ent o

f Sex

ually

Act

ive M

en S

till L

iving

with

Sp

ouse

of F

irst M

arria

ge

< 3 >=30%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90% 80%

56%

20%

44%

Percent Women in Intact or Broken MarriagesAge 36-45

by Number Nonmarital Sexual PartnersSource: NSFG, 2006-2010

Always IntactDivorced/Separated/Annulled/Multiple Mar-riage

Number of Nonmarital Sexual Partners

Perc

ent i

n Un

ion

Stat

us

15-18 19-22 23-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41+ Total0.001.002.003.004.005.006.007.008.009.00

10.00

3.95

5.897.66

8.509.56

8.76 8.61 8.07

Average Number Nonmarital Sexual Part-ners:

All Ages 15 to 45(excludes virgins: i.e. ever sexually active)

Source: NSFG, 2006-2010

AgeAver

age

Num

ber o

f Non

mar

ital S

exua

l Pa

rtner

s

1 2 3 4 5 6-10 11+ Total0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

52% 54% 51% 55%63% 63%

72%59%

Percent Women 31-45 Who Had An Out-Of-Wedlock Pregnancy

by Number Nonmarital Partners EverSource: NSFG, 2006-2010

Number of Nonmarital Partners EverPerc

ent W

omen

Had

an

Out-o

f-Wed

lock

Pr

egna

ncy

0 1 2 3 4 5 6-10 11+ Total0%10%20%30%40%50%

3%9% 9% 7%

13% 17%

28%

44%

21%

Percent Women Who Had At Least One Abortion

by Number Nonmarital Sexual Partners Ever

Source: NSFG, 2006-2010

Number of Nonmarital Sexual Partners Ever

Perc

ent W

omen

Who

Had

an

Abor

tion

0 1 2 3 4 5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21+0

10

20

30

40

50

60

812

18 1925

3134

3943

52

The More Sexual Partners the More Likely to Abort

Source: NSFG, 1995

Number of Nonmarital Sexual Partners in LifetimePerc

ent

Who

Hav

e Ab

ortio

ns L

ater

0%20%40%60%

1.71%16.29%

32.89%40.02%44.02%42.66%49.45%49.99%47.55%55.21%49.89%

Non-Marital Sexual Partners and Out-of-Wedlock Births

Source: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics, National Survey of Family Growth,

1995

Number of Lifetime Voluntary Non-Marital Sexual PartnersPerc

ent o

f Sex

ually

Act

ive

Wom

en

Aged

15-

44 w

ith C

hild

ren

0 1 2 3 4 5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21+0%10%20%30%40%50%60%

7.09%

30.21%36.48%

38.81% 44.16%

53.07%48.13% 47.03%

50.30%56.98%

Non-Marital Sexual Partners and Single Motherhood

Source: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics, National Survey of Family Growth,

1995

Number of Lifetime Voluntary Non-Marital Sexual PartnersPerc

ent o

f Sex

ually

Act

ive

Wom

en

Aged

15-

44 w

ith C

hild

ren

Adopt

iveInt

act

Widowed

Coha

biting

Divorce

dSt

epSin

gle

Grandp

aren

ts

Foste

r0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

78% 75%

59% 58%55% 55%

50%42%

29%

Teenage Virginity By Family StructureSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I.

Adolescents grade 7-12

% V

irgin

s

Intact Step Cohabit Divorced Single0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% 41.2%

25.8%

14.6%

6.3%3.3%

Father Rated Warm and LovingSource: National Longitudinal Survey of Ado-

lescent Health Wave 2, 1996

% R

atin

g Da

d W

arm

and

Lov

ing

Non-intact non-married childhood situation

Raised in intact married family

0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%

7.5%

2.5%

Female HomosexualitySource: NSFG, 2002; D. Paul Sullins, 2009

Sam

e Se

x Ac

tivity

in P

ast Y

ear

Ideal Of Family

Reality Of Family

ChurchFamily

Church & FamilyConsidered Together

<MONTHLY/NEVER WEEKLY/MONTHLY+2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

3

IN-TACT/CO-

HABIT(NATURAL)

2.75

2.94

2.48

2.72

Av

erag

e GP

A (E

nglis

h &

Mat

h Co

mbi

ned)

GPASource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12

<MONTHLY/NEVER WEEKLY/MONTHLY+

0.0%5.0%

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%

IN-TACT/COHABIT(NAT-URAL)

25.5%

17.3%

46.7%

32.5%

Expulsion & SuspensionSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Ado-

lescents grade 7-12

Perc

ent E

xpel

led

or S

uspe

nded

<MONTHLY/NEVER WEEKLY/MONTHLY+

0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.6

INTACT/COHABIT(NATURAL)ANY REJECTION

1.14

0.47

1.55

0.93

Number of Sexual Partners for GirlsSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I.

Adolescents grade 7-12

<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+

0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%

INTACT/COHABIT(NATURAL)ANY REJECTION

8.1%

5.2%

13.1%

8.5%

Running AwayBy Family Structure and Religious PracticeSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I.

Adolescents grade 7-12

Perc

ent

Who

Had

Eve

r Ru

n Aw

ay

<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%

INTACT/COHABIT(NATURAL)ANY REJECTION

33.4%

22.4%

41.2%

24.5%

Self Control: Times DrunkSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I.

Adolescents grade 7-12

<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

INTACT/COHABIT(NATURAL)ANY REJECTION

14.6%

8.5%

20.1%

9.5%

Self Control: Hard Drug UseSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I.

Adolescents grade 7-12

Perc

ent

Who

Hav

e U

sed

Har

d D

rugs

<MONTHLY/NEVER WEEKLY/MONTHLY+0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

IN-TACT/CO-

HABIT(NATURAL)

15.3%11.7%

23.5%

15.8%

Grand Theft by Family Structure and Reli-gious Practice

Source: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12

Perc

ent W

ho C

omm

itted

Gra

nd T

heft

5 Institutions: 5 Tasks

Family: next generationReligion: moral universals, worshipSchool: learningGovernment: protection, benevolenceMarketplace: income, property

Within all the 5 Institutions: The single most important virtue now?

Church: piety School: hard

work Government: justice

Marketplace: honesty Family:

chastity

Teaches Instrumentally

Teaches Relationally

Church & State As Teachers

Protects GoodAnd Punishes Evil

Inspires To Do GoodAnd Repent of Evil

Different Modes of Teaching

Force

Love

Animus Regarding Freedom

TWO TEACHERS  CHURCH STATEWAYS OF RULING By Free Assent By Force

WHAT IS TAUGHT Universal MoralityGovernment Morality (Law)

WAYS OF TEACHING Inspires (Relationally)

Forces (Instrumentally)

RELATIONSHIP TO GOOD AND EVIL

Inspires to do good and repent of evil.

Protects good. Punishes evil.

Society’s Foundational Relationship

www.marri.frc.org

Some of the studies available

• MAPPING AMERICA• STUDIES

– INDEX OF BELONGING / REJECTION – PORNOGRAPHY– EFFECT OF THE PILL ON ENVIRONMENT– RELIGIOUS WORSHIP / EDUC ATTAINMNT– EFFECTS OF EARLY ADOPTION– EFFECTS OF DIVORCE

marri@frc.org

Recommended