View
215
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
The Benthos
• By definition: organisms (animals andplants) that live on, in or attached tothe sea floor
• Includes 98% of all marine species• Coral Reefs alone contain 25% of all
marine species!• Community composition determined by
benthic composition
Benthic vs. Pelagic
• Benthic organisms are not adapted towide ranges in pressure
• There are very few transparentorganisms
• Generally stay to a smaller spatial area(they don’t move around as much)
• We classify them in relation to the typeof shoreline or bottom structure
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LAND AND OCEAN:
Ocean currents move ocean animals around.
Small animals in the ocean can be pushed around by currents, and may not be able to choose where to go. Adult fish and mammals can swim strongly, and adultinvertebrates cling to the bottom, but babies are at themercy of the currents.
Standard ecological theory (land):Animals are found in comfortable environments
Marine ecological theory:Animals may be found where the currents put them.Depends on animal’s lifestyle. Whether they surviveor not is largely dependent on the availability offood or suitable habitat (subtrate) in thatenvironment.
Benthic Substrates• Rocky, sandy, or muddy intertidal• Muddy deposits or hydrothermal
deposits in the deep sea• Biomass is closely related to surface-
water primary production
Benthic Diversity, Biomass
• Benthic diversity is largely controlled by– Temperature (more in warmer waters)– Currents (this affects the benthic structure)– Wave Energy (infauna vs. epifauna)
• Benthic Biomass is largely controlled by– Water column primary productivity
Many marine species have ‘bipartite’ life histories
1. Planktonic dispersive early stage
2. benthic or site attached adult stage
BENTHIC ADULTS
REPRODUCTION
SETTLEMENT
PLANKTONICLARVAE
*Larva: an independent, often free-living, developmentalstage that undergoes changes in form and size to matureinto the adult; especially common in insects and aquaticorganisms. (From a Latin word meaning "ghost" or"mask.")
Bipartite Lifestyles
• A major component of benthic ecology dealswith recruitment
• The larvae are often very different from theadult life stage
• While planktonic, many larvae do notconsume food (they rely on internal reserves)
• Some larvae utilize the DOM, acting as(essentially) very large bacteria
Retention
Demographically closedPelagic fisheries perspective
Hjort (1914)
Stock-recruitment relationships
Retention
Demographically closed
Larval pool
Dispersal
Demographically open
Benthic ecology perspective
Thorson (1950)For organisms with multi-phase lifehistories, understanding the biotic andphysical mechanisms that regulateabundance/distribution of adults requiresintegrating the dynamics and distributionsof several aspects of the life cycle.
Larval pool Mixtureof larvalinputs
Tagging Studies
Retention
Demographically closed
Larval pool
Dispersal
Demographically open
Swearer et al. 1999Jones et al. 1999 (Nature)
Genetic pop. structure:Barber et al. 2000 (Nature)
Reserves and SpeciesPersistence
From Botsford, Hastings, and Gaines. 2001. Ecology Letters
• Reserves can meetconservation goalsin two ways:– Large Individual
Size• > mean dispersal
distance• 2 - 3x mean
dispersal distancewith advection
– Large TotalNetwork Area
Abundance and diversity
The vent fauna comprises a list of mainly new and undescribed species 1991: 223 of the 236 species listed were new to science 1998: 443 species were listed Preponderence of three phyla: molluscs, arthropods and annelids
The list of species is still growing deep sea: 85 spp. on 61 manganese nodules at 2 sites vents: 236 spp. from ~30 dives intertidal boulder field: 214 invertebrate spp. in 9 0.01 m2 samples temperate corals: 309 spp. on 8 coral heads
most species are endemic to vents
some deep-sea taxa are absent from vents
most species are sessile with a few highly mobile ones
~75% of species only occur at one site
The main determinant of spatial and temporal patterns variation in vent flow
Results in variations in:• Temperature• Chemical composition of the fluid • Bacterial production
Abundance and diversity
Spatial patternsWithin vent fields
Diffuse flows: density and composition decrease concentrically
e.g. EPR (e.g. 9 ºN)
Tubeworms at vent openings: the obturaculum has to be exposed to absorb H2S and O2 in big clusters or small tufts
Mussels grow everywhere form patches or beds (100s-1000s of individuals)
Clams in cracks (for ideal positioning of foot and siphon) between lava pillows or on sheets away from high temperatures in areas of low fluid flux;
Crabs and fish very motile within or near animal clumps to distances of up to 500 m
Spatial patternsBetween vent fields
EPR, 21 ºN (Hessler et al. 1985) Two fields separated by few km One Calyptogena-dominated The other (higher flow) Riftia-dominated
Galapagos Rift (Hessler and Smithey 1984) Sites within 500 m of one another Rose Garden: dense vestimentiferan and mussel beds Garden of Eden: few vestimentiferans and mussels, no clams Mussel Bed: few vestimentiferans, mussels very abundant
MAR: no great spatial variability Broken Spur (29 ºN), TAG (26 ºN) and Snake Pit (23 ºN): dense assemblages of shrimp and few mussels Lucky Strike (37 ºN): single-taxon assemblages of mussels Logatchev: the only known vent field with live clams
Temporal (successional) patterns
East Pacific Rise – 9 ºN (Shank et al. 1998)
April 1991: eruption Diffuse flow 22-55ºC Increased H2S (1.9 mmol kg-1) and Fe (0.151 mmol kg-1) White filamentous bacterial mats, 1-10 cm thick, “snowstorms”
11 months Reduced vent emissions Reduced thickness of bacterial mats Patches of Tevnia (1-4 m2, separated by 2-340 m) Associated Lepetodrilus Bythograea thermydron; amphipods; zoarcids
32 months Diffuse flow 16-35ºC Reduced H2S (0.98 mmol kg-1) and Fe (0.024 mmol kg-1) Great spatial variability in diffuse flow Dead tubeworms in areas of ceased flow No bacterial mats Colonies of Riftia, over colonies of Tevnia, and elsewhere Increase in faunal diversity
East Pacific Rise – 9 ºN (continued)
42 months Diffuse flow 20-32ºC Reduced H2S (0.4-0.8 mmol kg-1) Cessation of flow in some fissures Riftia doubled in density Tevnia colonization continued Mussels 1-5 ind m-2
55 months Diffuse flow 10-20ºC Reduced H2S (0.19-0.3 mmol kg-1) and Fe (0.011 mmol kg-1) Some re-openings of flow Great increase in abundance of Riftia; no change in Tevnia Increased complexity (microhabitats), increased abundance of limpets Great increase in mussels (covering tubeworms and cracks) Great increase in serpulids Some anemones
Shank et al. (1998) Microbialmaterial
32 months:Riftia overtakingTevnia
11 months:Tevnia
42 months
55 months
Larval dispersal and supply
JdFR separated from EPR by > 2000 km
Larval retention (ephemeral habitat) vs. larval dispersal (dilution)
Stepping stone model A population divided into discrete subpopulations Dispersal occurs primarily between neighboring subpopulations Gene flow decreases as the number of steps between subpopulations increases
Island model All subpopulations are equally accessible to dispersing larvae Long-range dispersal among subpopulations predominates No relationship between genetic divergence and geographic distance
Examples SS: tubeworms and shrimp at Galapagos and EPR (Riftia pachyptila, Tevnia jerichonana, Oasisia alvinae, Ventiella sulfuris) IM: tubeworms at JdFR (Ridgeia piscesae) mussels, clams and limpets at EPR (Bathymodiolus thermophilus, Calyptogena magnifica, Eulepetopsis vitrea, Lepetodrilus pustulosus)
Larval dispersal and supply
Larvae near the bottom can travel between vents (100s m’s) within a 6-h tidal excursion
Larval entrainment in the hydrothermal plume diluted 104x by volume vertical velocities = 10 cm s-1
vertical volume fluxes = 500 m3 s-1
When plumes become neutrally buoyant they spread laterally they form vortex pairs
retention of larvae within the plume
vortex shedding
delivery of a concentrated patch of larvae
Mesoscale hydrodynamic processes (km’s – 100s km’s)
Recommended