The Air Jellyfish

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

The Air Jellyfish. Group # 1: Jacob Chard Ben Sponagle Chris Theriault Shane Yates Supervisor : Dr . Marek Kujath. Outline. Introduction Inspiration Objectives Fall Term Testing and Calculations The Design Alterations Fabrication Budget Testing and Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

The Air Jellyfish

Group #1: Jacob ChardBen Sponagle Chris TheriaultShane Yates

Supervisor: Dr. Marek Kujath

2

Introduction◦ Inspiration◦ Objectives◦ Fall Term Testing and Calculations

The Design◦ Alterations◦ Fabrication

Budget Testing and Evaluation Conclusions and Recommendations

Outline

3

The Inspiration: Festo AirJelly

Remote-controlled airborne jellyfish

Central electric drive moves tentacles

Horizontal motion controlled by centre-of-mass-shifting pendulum

Source: www.festo.com

4

Mimic appearance of a jellyfish

Achieve flight

Create effective advertising medium

Objectives

5

Fall Term Testing Mock up Model

◦ Double Pulley Mechanism vs. Pulley/Spring Mechanism

◦ Flexible Legs vs. Hinged Paddles◦ Oscillation Frequency

Calculations◦ Torque Requirement◦ Drag Forces◦ Lift

6

Calculations: Drag Forces

0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.50

0.20.40.60.8

11.21.41.61.8

Drag Force vs. Diameter at Different Velocities

V = 0.25 m/s V = 0.5 m/sV = 0.75 m/s V = 1.0 m/s

Diameter (m)

Dra

g Fo

rce

(N)

Drag Forces were found to be small

7

Torque Requirement

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Total Force vs. Position

Angular Position (deg)

Tota

l For

ce (

N)

Calculated to be 5.82 Nm

Motor selected based on torque requirement

HG312 Geared Motor 312:1www.robotmarketplace.com

8

Lift

0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.50

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Generated Lift vs. Balloon Diameter

Balloon Diameter (m)

Gen

erat

ed L

ift (

kg)

2.1m diameter balloon produces 5kg Lift

9

Frame Vertical Propulsion Mechanism Balloon Motor/Crank Steering Mechanism Wireless Control Circuitry

The Design

10

The FrameCarbon

Fibre Tubes

Rapid-Prototyped Joints

Rapid-Prototyped Hinges

Rapid-Prototyped Motor Platform

Aluminum Tubes

11

Vertical Propulsion Mechanism•Flexible flappers

-Vinyl Beams-Foam Board Paddles

•Upward thrust throughout stroke

12

Transmission

13

Weather Balloon

Helium Used for Lift

Net/Ring Support

Balloon

14

Dual Propellers

Provide linear horizontal movement and turning capability

Steering Mechanism

15

FM transmitter and receiver

Servo motors activate on/off switches

Dedicated power supply

Wireless Control

16

Lithium-Polymer battery pack◦ 3 cells (3.7 V each)◦ 2600 mAh capacity

Provide ample power for >30 min of operation

Primary Power Supply

17

AlterationsItem Initial Design Final DesignBalloon attachment

Nylon straps Cargo net over balloon; circular nylon strap around base of balloon

Advertisements TBD Pasted to paddles; banner attached to net

Flappers Two alternatives Flexible legs and rigid paddles

Motor 24 V DC 12 V DCTransmission Slider-rail “Scotch

yoke”Crank with guide-holes for cables

Control Electronic speed controllers

On/off switches flipped by servos

18

Joints, hinges, and base of motor platform were rapid-prototyped

Frame assembled with press-fitting Motor hub machined by Albert Motor stand made of balsa; attached to

base with epoxy Sewn balloon attachment ring

Fabrication

19

Item CostHelium $440Rapid prototyping $440Batteries and charger $400Pulleys $130Balloons $80Frame rods $70Primary motor $60Flappers $30Miscellaneous (fasteners, electrical parts, etc.) $120Total $1770

Budget

20

Three tests conducted in Sexton Gym

Number of tests limited by cost of helium (~$100 to fill balloon)

Testing

21

Insufficient helium to achieve flight

Verified all mechanical systems◦ Propellers moved device forward and provided

turning capability◦ Crank mechanism drove flappers with appropriate

range of motion

Learned lessons concerning device assembly

Test 1: March 27

22

Achieved controllable flight◦ Operated for over 30 minutes◦ Reached height of 8 m◦ Controlled from 28 m distance

Lessons learned◦ Difficult to determine orientation of device from

distance◦ Helium leakage might limit run time

Test 2: April 1 (It flew!)

23

Test 2: April 1 (It flew!)

24

Test 2: April 1 (It flew!)

25

Added advertisements and orientation indicators

Balloon ruptured during assembly

Test 3: April 6

26

Design RequirementsRequirement Fulfilled

Fit in a cube with 3m sides

Generate vertical propulsion with flapping appendages

Rise to a height of 8m

Operate for a period of 30 minutes

Be maneuverable in three dimensions

Weigh less than 5 kgBe operational for a period of at least one day without maintenance

27

Design RequirementsRequirement FulfilledBe safe to use. The building and testing of the prototype must also adhere to all safety procedures in accordance with Dalhousie University.

*

Be operational at a distance of 20 metres away from the operator.Have an attached advertisement that is interchangeable (i.e. the advertisement can be removed and replaced with a different advertisement).Function in an indoor and outdoor environment *

Be aesthetically pleasing as it is to be used as an advertising medium to draw attentionBe built under a budget of $2000.00.Be completed in conjunction with the deadlines set by the MECH 4010 syllabus.

28

Positives Overall success Most requirements met

Negatives Reliability issues

◦ Fragility of balloon Time and effort for assembly Cost of helium

Conclusions

29

Balloon reliability enhancement◦ Use a more rigid balloon◦ Contain balloon in protective envelope

More advanced control system◦ Height and obstacle detection◦ Motor speed controllers

Organic steering mechanism

Recommendations

30

Sponsors Shell Canada Welaptega Marine Air Liquide

Individuals Dr. Marek Kujath Albert et al. Dr. Julio Militzer Peter Jones Craig Arthur

Acknowledgements

31

Questions?