TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops. Presented By Mr. Guy Gribble General Manager, International Flight Resources, LLC. Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops. They Are The Same, Only Different Departures Holding Arrival Maneuvering Approaches Missed Approaches. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences

Presented ByMr. Guy Gribble

General Manager, International Flight Resources, LLC

They Are The Same, Only Different DeparturesHoldingArrival ManeuveringApproachesMissed Approaches

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

They Are The Same, Only Different Physics, Aerodynamics, MathematicsUnits of Measure

US Customary Units vs. MetersConversions ?

Rounding of NumbersFix Tolerances and AccuracyFlight Technical Errors

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Who is In Charge Here ? State (Country)

Aeronautical Information Publication, AIPFlight Check, MaintainPublish, Revise

Design CriteriaStandard design developmentRole of the Procedure DesignerPilot operational procedures

ICAO, International Civil Aviation OrganizationSARPS vs. Documents

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Where Does This Data Come From ? • State (Country)• Commercial Provider• WGS-84 Compliant ?

AirportCountrySomewhere ?

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

RussiaChina

India

Standard Instrument Departure “Normal” OperationsMaintain the Ground TrackMaintain the Required Climb Gradient

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

XXX

XXX

TERPS vs. Pans-Ops vs. FAR 25Standard Instrument Departure • Vertically Speaking

Departure End Of Runway

DER15?

1,500 Feet AFL

5 M

MSA

35 Ft ?

MSA

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • If straight out will not work…

Climb faster over obstacleTurn away from obstacleKeep in sight, “See and avoid”Climb in a safe sector away from obstacleSpeed limitingCombinations of any of the above

XXXXXX

XXXXXX

152 Feet per NM OCS 48 Feet per NM ROC 200 FEET PER NM

DER

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • Climb Faster Over Obstacle

Requires 350'/NM Until Reaching MSA

Maintain 4.3% Until Reaching 1700MSL

MSA

35 Ft ?

.8% MOC

3.3%

2.5% OIS

MSA

5 M

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • Turn Away From Obstacle

≈ 2 NM

Initial Climb Area

≈ 3.5 KM

Area 1

500' 500'

15˚ Splay

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • Turn Away From Obstacle

≈ 2 NM

Initial Climb Area

≈ 3.5 KM

Area 1

500' 500'

15˚ Splay

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure, TERPS• Keep in Sight and Tell Pilot to "See and Avoid"

15˚ MAXTake Off Minimums

800/2

Visual Climb Over Airport

Hazard Beacons on top of hill to the east

clearly visible or Take Off Minimums

600/1

X

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

15˚ MAXNo Departure Turns

East

Diverse Departure Evaluation

X25 or 46 NM

Standard Instrument Departure, TERPS• Climb in a Safe Sector

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

X

Standard Instrument Departure, PANS-Ops• Climb in a Safe Sector

No Turns Eastbound

X

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure, PANS-Ops• Climb in a Safe Sector

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • “Minimum Safe Altitude”, MSA TERPS

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • “Minimum Sector Altitude”, MSA PANS-Ops

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • “Minimum Safe Altitude”, MSA PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsTERPS vs. PANS-OpsHolding • Timing

PANS-Ops

TERPS

>14,000 = 1.5 Minute ≤ 14,000 = 1 Minute

>14,000 = 240>6,000≤ 14,000 = 220 KIAS ≤ 6,000 = 210

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsTERPS vs. PANS-OpsHolding • Speeds

>34,000 = IMN.83>20,000 ≤ 34,000 = 265 KIAS>14,000 ≤ 20,000 = 240 KIAS ≤ 14,000 = 230 KIAS

PANS-Ops

TERPS

265 230/210KIAS

200 KIAS

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsHolding • Evaluated Airspace

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Definitions and Use ofEntry Procedures

Evaluated AirspaceObstacle Clearance

SpeedsSelection of Turn

XXXXXX

XXXXXX

Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures

Holding In lieu of

Teardrop10 NM Limit

80/260

45/180

Racetrack

Base TurnTurn point

Entry Sector

80/260

45/180

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, TERPS

Entry Procedure

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, PANS-Ops

Entry Sector Defined

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, PANS-Ops

"Omni-Directional" Defined

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsEvaluated Airspace Intermediate Segment, TERPS

4.6 km

(2.5 NM) 4.6 km

(2.5 NM)

1 min./45-180Procedure turn area

Secondary area

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsEvaluated Airspace Intermediate Segment, PANS-Ops

All = 14.29˚ SPLAY

VOR = 7.8˚ SPLAYNDB = 10.3˚ SPLAY

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsEvaluated Airspace Final Segment, Non-Precision

350 No Final Approach Fix 300

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsApproach Procedures

300 Final Approach Fix 250200 Precision Approach 200

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures Speeds

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures Speeds

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsVisual Approaches and Visual Maneuvering

Definition ofUse for

Evaluated AirspaceOCA/ROC

SpeedsVisual Aids and Cues

XXXXXX

XXXXXX

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops"Visual" vs. Circle-to-Land

Definition ofUse for

Evaluated AirspaceOCA/ROC

SpeedsVisual Aids and Cues

MDA vs. Descent Point

XXXXXXX

XXXXXXX

394‘AFL

300‘AFL

“C” 4.2 NM“D” 5.28 NM

“C” 2.68 NM“D” 3.49 NM

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

1.7 NM 2.3 NM

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

AzoresGermany

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for

navigation.

GreeceSouth Korea

JapanCanadaMexico

Venezuela

Saudi Arabia

Intermediate Missed Approach

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsMissed Approach Procedures

Missed Approach

Requires 3.7% Climb

Intermediate Missed Approach

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsMissed Approach Procedures

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences

Presented ByMr. Guy Gribble

General Manager, International Flight Resources, LLCwww.InternationalFlightResources.com

Recommended