View
3
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Tenure and Promotion
Contact Information
Beverly McCrearyAssistant Vice ChancellorHawai`i Hall 209956-9429bmccrear@hawaii.edu
Reed DasenbrockVice Chancellor for Academic Affairs956-8447rdasenbr@hawaii.edu http://manoa.hawaii.edu/ovcaa/faculty/
Know your documents
2015-2017 Agreement between the University of Hawai`i Professional Assembly and the Board of Regents of the University of Hawai`i http://www.uhpa.org/contracts/2015-2017-ta-pdf/
Executive Policy (E5.221) http://www.hawaii.edu/policy/docs/temp/Attachment_1_Classification_of_Faculty_University_of_Hawaii_at_Manoa.pdf
2015 Mānoa Criteria and Guidelines http://manoa.hawaii.edu/ovcaa/faculty/tenure_promotion_contract_renewal/pdf/tp_criteria_guidelines_15_16.pdf
Department Procedures and Criteria
Changes in documents
Changes in the Agreement: Article X – “only Faculty Members of equal or higher rank to
which the applicant has applied can vote on applications for promotions”
Mānoa Criteria & Guidelines Departments should be articulating authorship conventions Clarification on criteria for Associate Professor/Reseacher
“should be well on the way to becoming an established scholar”
Guidelines on conflict of interest in external evaluations
MQ Waivers/Probationary PeriodTenure Probationary period
5 years Rank 2 and 3
3 years Rank 4
2 years Rank 5
Shorten or Lengthen (Max of 7 years) Approval by Dean
Promotion Time in rank
Years of service required for promotion to next rank (E5.221)
Approval by Dean
Educational Minimum educational
requirement of classification and rank (E5.221)
Approval by Chancellor
Review Process Due to Department Chair
October 2, 2015
Department Personnel Committee (DPC) Internal deadline
Department Chair Internal deadline
Dean or Director November 23, 2015
Tenure and Promotion Review Committee (TPRC) January 4, 2016
Review Process (continued) TPRC evaluation to Dean
February 6, 2016
Dossier to Chancellor’s Office February 12, 2016
Notification of TPRC evaluation (late February-mid March)
Mānoa Chancellor’s Review President’s Review Board of Regent’s Approval
Notification by June 30th
Tenure and Promotion Review Committees
Made up from the Faculty Personnel Panel All tenured I and R faculty at ranks 4 and 5 All tenured S, B, A faculty at ranks 3, 4, and 5
Faculty applicants can exclude up to ten (10) faculty from serving on the TPRC Sent directly to the applicant and returned directly to
OVCAA
Committee will consist of 6-8 senior faculty, not from your school or college
Compiling the Dossier
Application Faculty complete
Part 1 – Employment Details Part 2 – Criteria and Guidelines Part 3 – Credentials and Experience Part 4 – Endeavors
Reviewers complete Part 5 – Department Assessment (include DPC procedures)
Part 6 – Dean/Director’s Assessment and Recommendation
Part 7 – TPRC’s Recommendation Part 8 – Request to Examine Dossier (applicant) Part 9 – Chancellor’s Recommendation/Decision
Compiling the Dossier (continued)
Logistics: Each page should have your name and a page
number (can use labels) Margins need to be wide enough to ensure readability Bound in file folders or three-hole binders (use size
appropriate for dossier) Can be double sided Reminder on Language
Compiling the Dossier (continued)
Statement of Endeavors (Part 4) Opportunity to speak directly to the review bodies
about the unique aspects and special significance of your accomplishments and future plans/value
Future Value Section has been removed as a separate section but should be included in your narrative for tenure
An analysis of your activities since your last promotion or initial hire
Direct it toward readers who may not be in your field Recommended length 1-9 pages (12 pt)
Compiling Dossier (continued)
Supporting Materials This section can be utilized to
provide summary evidence Summary of teaching
evaluations or workshop presentations
Examples of courses or programs developed
Examples of programs developed or presentations
Peer evaluations of contributions
Supplemental Materials This box, file or drive can
store the specific data summarized in the supporting materials Actual teaching evaluations Actual presentations developed Sample of scholarship produced
Bibliography
Provides an invaluable objective record of your scholarly activity.
Separate published works, conference presentations and manuscripts into appropriate groups (use categories adapted to discipline)
List most recent first Give full citation Note and define “in press”; if possible provide letter Make a clear distinction between sole authored work and
joint
Last Comments
Procedural Questions Your DC or DPC Chair Beverly McCreary
bmccrear@hawaii.edu
Content Questions DC Other Faculty in your Department Faculty Mentoring Program
www.fmp.hawaii.edu
Select materials that are most significant Quality over quantity Carefully assess how to present works in progress Have someone review your dossier
Remember you have multiple audiences
Concise
Clear
Recommended