View
220
Download
1
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
TENSILE STRUCTURESCABLE-NET METHOD
Sotiris Sotiriou
May 2006
Abstract
Tension Structures - Cable Net Method
by
Sotiris Sotiriou
In recent decades tensile structures have become very popular due to their notable ad-
vantages. Tension Structures are very light, flexible, capable to cover long spans and
efficient in the use of different materials. However, the analysis process is particularly
challenging. The necessity of the form-finding procedure and the need of the large dis-
placement theory make tensile structure analysis a complicated and time-consuming
process. Practical analysis generally does not require accounting for non-linear material
properties.
Finite element method and Cable net method can be used for the analysis of tensile
structures. Cable net models are commonly used in the design of those types of structures
because they are very physical more simple and need less computer power.
This project deals with theoretical and computer programming techniques used in the
numerical analysis of tensile cable structures. The Cable-Net method, Shape finding, and
Geometric non-linear analysis, are explained extensively in terms of three dimensional
application on tensile structures.
Contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Scope of Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2 History and Applications 4
2.1 Historical Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Tensile Structural Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2.1 Pure Cable net Forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.2.2 Cable-stayed forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.2.3 Tensegrity systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.2.3.1 Cable-strut systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3 Materials and Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.3.1 Cables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.3.1.1 Axial Stiffness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.3.2 Glass and Fabric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3 Analysis Methods 20
3.1 Cable Net Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.1.1 The Shape Finding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1.1.1 Grid Method. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.2 Non Linear Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.2.1 Geometric Non-Linear Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.2.1.1 Geometric Stiffness Matrix Method . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.2.1.2 Load Step Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
iv
CONTENTS
3.3 Detailing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4 CableNL Software 40
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4.2 Software Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.2.1 Gauss Elimination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.2.2 Non Linear Analysis Work-Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
4.2.2.1 LDU Subroutine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
4.3 User’s Manual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
4.4 Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
4.5 Numerical Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
4.5.1 Example. Glass Wall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
4.5.2 Example. Fabric Roof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
5 Conclusions 79
A CableNL – Verification Examples 84
A.1 Shape Finding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
A.1.1 LAYOUT.FOR – Input . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
A.1.2 LAYOUT.FOR – Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
A.1.3 CableNL – Input . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
A.1.4 CableNL – Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
A.2 Non Linear Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
A.2.1 TR3DNL.FOR – Input . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
A.2.2 TR3DNL.FOR – Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
A.2.3 CableNL – Input . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
A.2.4 CableNL – Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
B CableNL – Numerical Examples 104
B.1 Glass wall example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
B.1.1 Input File: UBS Building.cn-in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
B.1.2 Analysis Parameters: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
B.1.3 Non Linear Analysis Results: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
v
CONTENTS
B.2 Fabric Roof Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
B.2.1 Input File: Roof Example.cn-in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
B.2.2 Force Balance and Joint Coordinates: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
B.2.3 Non Linear Analysis Results: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
vi
List of Figures
1.1 Membrane Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Cable-Net Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Pneumatic Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.1 Dorton Arena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2 Arena’s structural system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3 The German Pavilion in Montreal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.4 Cable-net cooling tower, Schmehausen 1968 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.5 Cable Net Tower, Structural System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.6 U.S Pavilion Expo 70’ in Osaka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.7 The Olympic Stadium of Munich . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.8 Munich Olympic games 1972 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.9 Georgia Dome, Atlanta 1992 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.10 Georgia Dome, Roof indoor view . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.11 The Millennium Dome, Aerial view . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.12 Millennium Dome, Side view . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.13 The Time Warner, Cable net wall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.14 Cable net Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.15 Vertical Cable String. Reproduced from [2] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.16 Cable State basic unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.17 Cable girder dome, Form with opening. Reproduced from [2] . . . . . . 12
2.18 Cable girder dome. Reproduced from Mero Structures. . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.19 Geiber’s Dome. Reproduced from [2] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
2.20 Spatially triangulated dome. Reproduced from [2] . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.21 Cable-strut form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.22 Wire Rope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.23 Wire rope, right and left hand lays. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.24 Stress/Strain Curve for Steel and Glass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.1 The Force Density Method for bar elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.2 The Grid Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.3 Grid Method, Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.4 CableNL, Smoothed Geometry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.5 Force - Displacement curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.6 P −∆ and P − δ effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.7 Member orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3.8 Plane Truss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
3.9 Patterning: Triangle Strips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.10 In plane restraints at bolted connections. Reproduced form [4] . . . . . . 38
3.11 Turnbuckle to swaged eye termination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
3.12 Eye and U-clips cable termination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
4.1 CableNL flowchart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4.2 Shape Finding flowchart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.3 non linear analysis, flowchart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
4.4 Symmetric Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.5 Geometry Input - Brava Viewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
4.6 Analysis Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
4.7 Scaled Deformed Shape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
4.8 Plan View. Use 1/8 of the structure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
4.9 Joint and members labels of 1/8 of the structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
4.10 CableNL, Input Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
4.11 CableNL, Output Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
4.12 CableNL, Joint Labels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
4.13 Plane Cable-net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
4.14 Non-linear analysis, deformed shape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
4.15 Maximum displacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
4.16 UBS Tower. Cable net glass wall. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
4.17 Transform load to joints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
4.18 Elevation of a Typical Bay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4.19 CableNL, Deformed Shape. Scale factor equals four. . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
4.20 Horizontal maximum displacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
4.21 Vertical maximum displacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
4.22 Joint Loads. Triangular panels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
4.23 Roof - Geomerty Input . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4.24 New Shape after grid method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4.25 Roof. Analysis Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
4.26 Deformed shape. Scale Factor two . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
4.27 Roof, side view . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
4.28 Vertical maximum displacements (ft) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
4.29 Horizontal maximum displacements (ft) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
ix
List of Tables
2.1 Mechanical Properties of Steel Cables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.2 Comparison of Polyester and Fiberglass characteristics . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.3 Mechanical Properties of Glass. Pilkington Technical Information ATS-
129 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.1 Shape Finding. Free joints’ coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
4.2 Joint Force Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
4.3 Shape Finding. Member Forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
4.4 Total displacements (in) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
4.5 Member Forces (lbs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
x
Chapter 1
Introduction
Every part of a tensile structure is loaded only in tension, with no requirement to resist
compression or bending forces. The basic types of tension structures are:
• Membranes: The structural membrane acts also as the weather shield. Fig:1.1
• Cable Nets: A separate grid of structural cables supports a nonstructural weather
shield. Fig:1.2
• Pneumatics: The tension force is created by an interior positive pressure and the
membrane acts as the weather shield. Fig:1.3
Figure 1.1: Membrane Structure
1
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
Tensile structures have always fascinated architects and engineers, mainly because of
their special features. Aesthetic shapes, light weight and flexibility, combined with new
materials, make tension structures the new trend in architectural design.
Figure 1.2: Cable-Net Structure Figure 1.3: Pneumatic Structure
However, these special features require special design, that makes the analysis much more
complicated. Due to absence of flexural stiffness of cables and membranes, the initial
configuration of these structures must be stressed. Thus, before the analysis, the initial
geometry configuration must be found.
The shape of a tensile structure, governs the load-bearing capacity of the structure.
Therefore, the process of determining the initial equilibrium configuration, calls the
designers ability to find an optimum compromise between shape, load capacity and
constructional requirements. After the shape finding procedure, geometrical nonlinear
analysis is required due to a high degree of flexibility of the structure.
1.1 Scope of Work
The scope of this work is to familiarize the reader, with the challenging design of tension
Structures. According to Campbel 1, “no other class of architectural structural systems
1D. Campbel. The Unique Role of Computing in the Design and Construction of Tensile MembraneStructures.
2
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
is as dependent upon the use of digital computers as are tensile structures”. The project
goes beyond the theoretical approach with the development of a computer software.
1.2 Organization
The project consists of three major parts. The first part will be a general overview about
history, applications and materials that are used for tension structures. The second part
will focus on the analysis procedures using theCable net method. The third part will be
a brief description about the developed software “CableNL”.
3
Recommended