View
226
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Team Members: Cole Marburger Kyle Kuhlman Travis McKibben
Faculty Advisor: Dr. Jiwan Gupta
DESIGN OF A GREEN TEACHING CENTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO
- SCOTT PARK -
Michael McNeill Justin Niese Michael Titus
Focus & Goals Design a Sustainable Building for UT’s
Scott Park Campus Utilize and Research
Green Technologies• Solar Panels / Geothermal H/C• Water Conservation / Green Roof
Design based on Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Principles
Create a Unique Building to Recognize UT’s Sustainable Efforts
Key Attributes “Hands-on” Equipment Labs
• Civil• Mechanical• Electrical
Computer Labs Classrooms to Research and Study
Green Technologies Auditorium to Hold Green Seminars
Site – Existing Conditions
Existing Restrictions Engineering Technologies Building Scott Park Campus
Building 6 Baseball Diamonds Soccer Field Parking Lots Scott Lake Pond
Site – Existing Conditions
View looking East
View looking South
LEED Accreditation LEED Certification Levels:
Certified (40-49)Silver (50-59)Gold (60-79) Platinum (80-110)
Minimum LEED Certification at UT: Silver
Plan to Achieve a Minimum of Gold Level Set the standard for “Energy and Innovation”
LEED 2009 New Construction Design ManualChecklists
• Sustainable Sites• Water Efficiency• Energy & Atmosphere• Materials & Resources• Indoor Environmental Quality• Innovation & Design Process• Regional Priority Credits
Detailed Credit Info• Intent, Requirements, Potential Strategies
LEED Accreditation
LEED Project Checklist
Example Section-Sustainable
Sites
Current analysis achieves 81 points total (Platinum Rating)Point total achieved through combined civil, mechanical, and
electrical design groups
Detailed LEED Strategies Plan
Provide specific details for credits to be achieved
LEED Accreditation
Existing Hybrid Sign
Sustainable Technologies
Solar Panels Geothermal Heating/Cooling Rain Water Collection Green Roof
Solar Panels Utilize a large grid-tied system
• Allow energy to be sold into the grid at low consumption times
• Avoid large battery bank; making the system easier to maintain and more eco-friendly
Wirelessly monitor through a PC/Website
36 kW tower system consisting of 6 inverters and 180 panels
Geothermal Heating/Cooling
Vertical closed-loop system was developed by the mechanical group.
Reduce the Heating/Coolingcosts and earn LEED credits
Rainwater Collection Rainwater to be collected only from the
main roof 20,000 Gal. tank proposed Irrigation to be north and west of building
(Hatched area on following slide) No potable water will be needed for
irrigation
Green Roof Located on top of auditorium. Entrance
on 3rd floor of main building Green roof will feature extensive
vegetation Extensive vegetation is lighter and
requires less soil, therebyreducing the load (saturated load approximately 34 psf)
Will feature walkways and tablesfor occupants to enjoy
Research Labs Civil Experiments
• Pervious Pavements• Green Roofs
Mechanical Experiments• Electric Motors• Hydrogen Fuel Powered Engines • Green Heating and Cooling Systems
Electrical Experiments• Smart Grid• Wind Turbines• Solar Panels
• Storm Water Collection• LEED Design Techniques
Interior Concept
Exterior Plan
Utilize Kalwall TranslucentDaylighting Systems Minimize need for
artificial lightPanels provide low
solar heat gain and high insulation values
Made from 20% recycled content
Exterior Plan – Glass Strategically use windows to keep occupants in
touch with outside world while providing natural light
Floor Layout
**Entrance windows and roof not shown for clarity
Structural Design Structural Steel Frame Procedures followed:
• Load and Resistance Factored Design (LRFD)• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Version 7• American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)
Complete SAP 2000 v12 Analysis Hand Calculations for Typical Members/Sections
• Floor Beams• Interior/Exterior Girders• Columns• Auditorium Roof
• Main Roof• Wind Bracing• Foundation
Loads 1st Floor
• Dead = 200 psf
2nd & 3rd Floors:• Dead = 100 psf
Auditorium Green Roof• Dead = 40 psf• Snow = 20 psf
Main Roof• Dead = 40 psf• Snow = 20 psf
• Live = 80 psf
• Live = 80 psf
• Live = 80 psf
• Roof Live = 20 psf
SAP 2000
Floor Beams Located on the 2nd and 3rd floors Designed to support metal decking with
concrete cover Uniform distributed load on entire beam
• Max load case: 1.2D + 1.6L
The beam was designed for the maximum bending moment
Allowable deflection controlled beam selection
Interior / Exterior Girders
Designed using end reactions from connecting floor beams
Point loads at girder/floor beam connections • Max load case: 1.2D + 1.6L + .5S
2 Typical interior and 2 exterior were designed
Allowable deflection controlled girder selection
Columns Designed using axial loading from SAP
2000 analysis – Max load: 1.2D + 1.6L + .5S 3 Typical columns (Locations on next slide)
• Main exterior (Red)• Main interior (Blue)• Auditorium (Yellow)
Maximum axial load controlled column selection
N
Auditorium Green Roof Designed to support saturated green roof Distributed load on entire joist
• Max load case: 1.2D + 1.6L + .5S• Max span: 85 feet
Long span LH series roof joist Allowable distributed load controlled selection
Main Roof System Designed using supported tributary area Distributed load on entire joist
• Max load case: 1.2D + 1.6L + .5S• Max span joist: 70’• Max span joist girder: 34’
2 typical joists and 1 joist girder designed Built-up-roof components (per UT guidelines)
• Metal decking• SEBS base sheet• Type 6 glass felts
Main Wind Force Resisting System
Based on ASCE 7 provisions Wind Load Factor = 1.6
(LRFD Combinations)
3 wind braces to resist East-West winds 2 wind braces to resist North-South winds 3 designs to accommodate structural
differences in the building
Wind Brace Locations
N
Typical Wind Brace
Foundation Selection Loadings obtained from SAP Analysis of the
building Pad footings with integrated auger cast piles
were selected Pad footings and piles required less concrete
than strip or mat foundations The piles transmit some load to more stable
clays below grade Four typical pad footings were designed to
increase efficiency
Footing Design Soil info was obtained from boring logs of
Scott Park Estimated bearing capacity of 4 kips/sq ft for
the soil Foundation size and number of piles
determined by loading and bearing capacity Designed for one and two way shear to obtain
sufficient depth for the reinforcing steel of the foundation
Foundation – Layout Drawing
Foundation – Detail Drawing
Take Home Message Place UT at the forefront of researching
sustainable technologies Create a learning environment for both
students and the public
Provide a recognizable
high performance building
to showcase UT’s sustainable efforts
AISC Steel Construction Manual. Thirteenth Edition. The United States of America: American Institute of Steel
Construction, 2005
Das, Braja M. Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering. Ontario: Thomson Learning, 2008.
McCormack, Jack and Russell Brown. Design of Reinforced Concrete. Hoboken: Wiley Publishing, 2009.
Leet, Kenneth M., Chia-Ming Uang, and Anne M. Gilbert. Fundamentals of Structural Analysis. Third Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008
Segui, William T. Steel Design. Fourth Edition. Toronto: Thomson, 2007
United States Green Building Council. LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations Rating System. Washington, District of Columbia. November 2008.
References
Questions
?
Recommended