Team 6: “Soldier Portable UAV” David Neira TJ Worden Matthew Martin Joshua Mellen Ona Okonkwo...

Team 6: “Soldier Portable UAV”• David Neira• TJ Worden• Matthew Martin• Joshua Mellen• Ona Okonkwo• Josiah Shearon

AIR HERCULES

1

Develop a UAV to compete in the 2011 AIAA Design/Build/Fly Competition◦ Location: Tucson, AZ◦ Date: April 15-17, 2011

Primary requirements:◦ Assembly◦ Hand launched◦ Design Limitations

Power/Electronics Sizing Configuration

Project Overview

2

Mission Profile

Mission 1: Dash to Critical Target• Maximum laps in 4 minutes

Mission 2: Ammo Re-supply• 3 laps with steel bar payload

Mission 3: Medical supply Mission• 3 laps with golf ball payload

3

Overall Scoring Equation

4

RAC

MMMeReportScorTotalScore 321

Project ManagementFaculty AdvisorsDr. Chiang Shih

Dr. Joe Yeol

Project LeadMatthew Martin (ME)

Materials/FabricationJosiah Shearon (ME)

Electronics/ControlJoshua Mellen (EE)

Onachukwu Okonkwo (EE)

PropulsionDavid Neira (ME)

AerodynamicsTJ Worden (ME)

Materials/FabricationRyan Jantzen

Electronics/ControlRicardo Ascencio

PropulsionMyles BeanJohn Edgar

AerodynamicsEric Sloan

Walker Carr

5

Project Schedule

6

Conceptual Design Phase

7

Specification Value

Empty Weight < 1.6 lbs

Payload to Weight Ratio > 1.5

Propulsion Battery Weight < 0.75 lbs

Maximum Current Draw 20 amps

Maximum Linear Dimension 22 in

Assembly Time < 5 min

• Design Process• Scoring Analysis• Product Specifications• Aircraft Configuration

Propulsion / Control Systems

Aerodynamics

Materials / Fabrication

Subsystem Development

8

Competition Requirement:◦ 20 Amp maximum draw◦ ¾ lb. maximum battery weight◦ Separate propulsion and control system

Research/Analyze Major Components◦ Batteries◦ Motor / ESC◦ Propeller◦ Transmitter / Receiver◦ Servos

Propulsion / Control Systems

9

Propulsion / Control Systems

10

Propulsion / Control Selection

Electrical System Motor

Transmitter Aurora 9 Type Himax HA2025-4200

Receiver Optima 7 Ch Receiver Weight 2.82 oz

Servos 4 Power HD D65 Kv 4200 rpm/v

Motor Controller Castle Creations Phoenix 25A Io 0.75 A

Batteries R 0.75 Ω

Type Receiver Propulsion Power 175 W

Brand KAN 180 Elite 1500 Thrust 2.23 lb

Capacity 180 mAh 1500 mAh Current Draw 15 A

Cell Voltage 1.2 V 1.2 V Gear Ratio 6.6:1

Max Current 20 A 20 A Propeller 12 x 10

Number of Cells 5 10  

Pack Voltage 6 V 12 V  

Weight 1.48 oz 8.10 oz  

11

Wing◦ Airfoil comparisons◦ Wing sizing tradeoffs

Stability ◦ Control surface sizing◦ Empennage sizing

Fuselage ◦ Streamlining

Aerodynamics

12

Aerodynamics

13

Airfoil Selection

Main Wing: Eppler 422

Tail Wing: NACA 0012

Aerodynamics Initial Sizing

Specification Value

Fuselage Volume 46.3 in3

Wing Area 406 in2

Effective Wing Span 44 in

Aspect Ratio 4.55

15

Property Comparison◦ Weight◦ Strength◦ Stiffness

Considered Materials◦ Wood – Balsa, Bass, Plywood◦ Carbon Fiber / Composites◦ High Density Foam◦ Adhesive

Materials & Structures

16

Primary structures◦ Wing spar

Uni-directional 1k CFRP/foam

◦ Wing ribs Balsa wood & aircraft ply

◦ Bulkhead CFRP & balsa ply

◦ Upper & lower spine CFRP

◦ Nose & tail fairing Single ply 1k plain weave CFRP

Materials Selection

17

System Integration Ground Testing

◦ Assembly Time◦ Propulsion and

Controls◦ Structural Integrity

Flight Testing◦ Hand Launch◦ Control Handling◦ Flight Endurance◦ Payload Testing◦ Landing

Performance

Final Design

18

Aircraft Specifications

Overall Aircraft Fuselage

Total Length 29.83 in Length 15.56 in

Total Width 47.98 in Width 5.02 in

Total Height 10.24 in Height 3.08 in

19

M2: Steel Bar Configuration

20

M3: Golf Ball Configuration

21

Payload configurations

Mission 3:Golf Ball Storage

Qty: 16

Mission 2:Steel Bar Storage

22

Electronics Layout

23

System Component Breakdown

24

Assembly Demonstration

25

Suitcase Configuration

Disassembled Aircraft

Competition Risk Assessment Potential Risks

◦ Harsh landing / propeller-ground interference◦ High wind speed◦ Inexperienced pilot

Prototype◦ Novice aircraft designers / builders

Robust 1st design: Over-engineered Multiple flight tests

Final Design ◦ Much lighter, competitive design

Component supply redundancy◦ Recruited professional pilot

26

Video

Flight Demonstration

27

Questions?

28