SXSW2013 Presentation - Unabomber debate slides

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Ted Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber, continues to write anti-technology essays from prison, and his fans believe he makes some good points about the unforseen consequences of technology in modern society. One of those fans is philosopher David Skrbina, the Unabomber's longtime pen pal, who recently helped publish a book of the Kaczynski's writings. Mr. Skrbina says the violent tech skeptic should be taken seriously for his ideas. In this session, we'll explore whether that's true. Mr. Skrbina will outline the Unabomber's latest thinking, and another philosopher of technology, Peter Ludlow, will offer a counterpoint, in a debate moderated by a journalist who recently wrote a popular article on the topic.

Citation preview

What  Can  We  Learn  from  the  Unabomber?  

SXSW  2013  

Moderator:  Jeff  Young  Chronicle  of  Higher  Educa?on  @jryoung  

The  Unabomber  

The  Unabomber  

•  Mail-­‐bombing  campaign  from  1978  to  1995.  

•  Killed  3  people  and  injured  23.  

The  Unabomber  

•  35,000-­‐word  manifesto  published  in  Sept.  1995.  

•  Argued  that  technology  is  destroying  freedom  and  well-­‐being.      

-­‐-­‐  supermax  prison  in  Florence,  Colorado  

The  Unabomber’s  Pen-­‐Pal  

•  Chronicle  of  Higher  Ed  ar?cle  

U.  Michigan’s  Anarchist  Archive  

     Wired  Magazine  co-­‐founder  Kevin  Kelly  calls  Ted  Kaczynski’s  manifesto:  "one  of  the  most  astute  analyses"  of  technological  systems  he  has  ever  read,  though  he  disagrees  with  the  conclusion.  

Why  Aren’t  There  More  Voices  Cri?cal  of  Technology  in  Society?  

Teaching  the  Unabomber:  On  syllabus  of  Skrbina’s  course:    “Philosophy  of  Technology”  

Unse^ling  Ques?ons  

•  “Is  it  even  morally  or  ethically  right  to  be  studying  the  works  of  a  societal  criminal—in  this  case  a  social  terrorist?"  

Unse^ling  Ques?ons  

•  “Is  it  even  morally  or  ethically  right  to  be  studying  the  works  of  a  societal  criminal—in  this  case  a  social  terrorist?”  

•  Should  we  even  be  here  having  this  discussion?  

•  Is  technology  making  our  lives  richer  or  poorer?    

Peter  Ludlow  

•  A  muckraker  of  virtual  worlds  

Ludlow  –  a.k.a.  Urizenus  Sklar  

Calling  For  Be^er  Virtual  Governance  

     “He  compares  the  establishment  of  virtual  worlds  to  the  American  Revolu?on  and  the  founding  of  the  United  States.  Cyberspace  needs  great  thinkers  to  formulate  its  governance  structures,  he  says,  just  as  Thomas  Jefferson  devised  the  Declara?on  of  Independence.”  

WHAT  WE  CAN  LEARN  FROM    THE  UNABOMBER  

                                                                                                             David  Skrbina  

                                                                         University  of  Michigan  (Dearborn)  

TECHNOLOGICAL SKEPTICISM

Technological  Skep?cism  

•  “Technology…is  the  controlling  power  of  our  age,  affec?ng  and  shaping  virtually  all  aspects  of  human  existence  in  this  century.”  

Webster  Hood,  1972  

Technological  Skep?cism  

•  “Technology…is  the  controlling  power  of  our  age,  affec?ng  and  shaping  virtually  all  aspects  of  human  existence  in  this  century.”  

Webster  Hood,  1972  

•  “It  may  be  that  civiliza?on  will  never  recover  from  the  bad  climate  which  enveloped  the  introduc?on  of  machinery.  …  

Technological  Skep?cism  

•  “Technology…is  the  controlling  power  of  our  age,  affec?ng  and  shaping  virtually  all  aspects  of  human  existence  in  this  century.”  

Webster  Hood,  1972  

•  “It  may  be  that  civiliza?on  will  never  recover  from  the  bad  climate  which  enveloped  the  introduc?on  of  machinery.  …    The  world  is  now  faced  with  a  self-­‐evolving  system  ,  which  it  cannot  stop.”  

A.  N.  Whitehead,  1925  

Technological  Skep?cism  

SOME  FUNDAMENTAL  QUESTIONS:  

Technological  Skep?cism  

SOME  FUNDAMENTAL  QUESTIONS:  

•  What  is  technology?  

Technological  Skep?cism  

SOME  FUNDAMENTAL  QUESTIONS:  

•  What  is  technology?  

•  What  is  its  purpose?  

Technological  Skep?cism  

SOME  FUNDAMENTAL  QUESTIONS:  

•  What  is  technology?  

•  What  is  its  purpose?  

•  Does  it  increase,  or  decrease,  overall  human  well-­‐being?  

Technological  Skep?cism  

SOME  FUNDAMENTAL  QUESTIONS:  

•  What  is  technology?  

•  What  is  its  purpose?  

•  Does  it  increase,  or  decrease,  overall  human  well-­‐being?  

•  Where  is  it  heading?  

Technological  Skep?cism  

SOME  FUNDAMENTAL  QUESTIONS:  

•  What  is  technology?  

•  What  is  its  purpose?  

•  Does  it  increase,  or  decrease,  overall  human  well-­‐being?  

•  Where  is  it  heading?  

•  Do  we  control  it?  

Technological  Skep?cism  

SOME  FUNDAMENTAL  QUESTIONS:  

•  What  is  technology?  •  What  is  its  purpose?  •  Does  it  increase,  or  decrease,  overall  human  well-­‐being?  

•  Where  is  it  heading?  •  Do  we  control  it?  •  Might  it  threaten  our  very  existence?  

*****************  

What  can  we  learn  from  the  Unabomber?  

Peter  Ludlow,  Northwestern  U.  

What  can  we  learn  from  the  Unabomber?  

Nothing.  

But…  

But…  

This  doesn’t  mean  our  technological  system  is  benign.  

and…  

and…  

This  doesn’t  mean  radical  measures  aren’t  called  for.  

It  means…  

It  means…  

The  Unabomber  is  not  the  go  to  guy  for  answers.  

The  Plan  

The  Plan  

1)  Why  the  Unabomber  Manifesto  is  Weak  

The  Plan  

1)  Why  the  Unabomber  Manifesto  is  Weak  2)  Why  the  Unabomber  Manifesto  is  Wrong  

The  Plan  

1)  Why  the  Unabomber  Manifesto  is  Weak  2)  Why  the  Unabomber  Manifesto  is  Wrong  

3)  What  is  a  Be^er  Cri?que?  

Recommended