View
215
Download
2
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
SW PBS:Training for Coaching
CapacityMD PBIS Leadership Team
George Sugai & Teri Lewis-PalmerOSEP Center on PBIS
University of Connecticut
July 18, 2005
George.Sugai@uconn.edu
www.PBIS.org www.SWIS.org
Purpose
• Discuss importance of coaching capacity
• Review coaching basics
• Provide guidelines for effective coaching
Problem Statement
“We give schools strategies & systems for developing more positive, effective, & caring school & classroom climates, but implementation is not accurate, consistent, or durable. Schools & teams need more than training.”
Competing, Inter-related National Goals
• Improve literacy, math, geography, science, etc.
• Make schools safe, caring, & focused on teaching & learning
• Improve student character & citizenship
• Eliminate bullying
• Prevent drug use
• Prepare for postsecondary education
• Provide a free & appropriate education for all
• Prepare viable workforce
• Affect rates of high risk, antisocial behavior
• Leave no child behind
• Etc….
Worry“Train & hope” approach
1. React to identified problem
2. Select & add practice
3. Hire expert to train practice
4. Expect & hope for implementation
5. Wait for new problem….
Discovery Education
“Discovery is no solution to the problems of education. The individual cannot be expected to rediscover more than a very small part of the facts and principles that have already been discovered by others. To stop teaching in order that the student may learn for himself is to abandon education as a medium for transmission of the accumulated knowledge and wisdom of a culture” (Skinner, 1965, p 101).
Systems Perspective• Organization do not “behave”
…individuals behave
• “Organization is group of individuals who behave together to achieve a common goal”
• “Systems are needed to support collective use of best practices by individuals in an organization” (Horner, 2001)
Schools as Systems
Goal to create communities that for all its members have common
• Vision
• Language, &
• Experience
Biglan, 1995; Horner, 2002
Adopt systems perspective
Leadership Team
FundingVisibility Political
Support
Training Coaching Evaluation
Active Coordination
Local School Teams/Demonstrations
PBS Systems Implementation Logic
Coaching (why?)• Team start-up support
• Team sustainability/accountability– Technical assistance/problem solving
– Positive reinforcement
– Prompts (“positive nags”)
• Public relations/communications
• Support network across schools
• Link among leadership, trainers, & teams
• Local facilitation
• Increased behavioral capacity
Terminology
• Coaching v. Facilitating
– Same
• Coach v. Facilitator
– Same
• Facilitating v. Coach
– Skills/tasks v. Person
What is “Coaching Capacity?”
• Personnel & resources organized to facilitate, assist, maintain, & adapt local school training implementation efforts
• Coaching is set of responsibilities, actions, & activities….not person
Guiding Principles (“Requirements”)
• Coaching linked with school team
• Coaching training linked with team training
• Coaches participate in team training
• New teams added with increased fluency
• Coaching capacity integrated into existing personnel Supervisor approval given
• District agreements & support given
• Coaches experienced with school team implementation
• District/state coordination provided
• Coaches meet regularly for prompting, celebrating, problem solving, etc.
Successful Coaching starts by “knowing the
basics”
Redundancy & practice build fluency!
Primary Prevention:School-/Classroom-Wide Systems for
All Students,Staff, & Settings
Secondary Prevention:Specialized Group
Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior
Tertiary Prevention:Specialized
IndividualizedSystems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
~80% of Students
~15%
~5%
3-Tiered Prevention Logic
SYST
EMS
PRACTICES
DATASupportingStaff Behavior
SupportingStudent Behavior
OUTCOMES
Supporting Social Competence &Academic Achievement
SupportingDecisionMaking
SW PBS
PBSFeatures
Science of Human
Behavior
Local Context& Culture
Prevention Logic
NaturalImplementers
Evidence-Based
Practices
SystemsChange&
Durability
Continuum ofBehavior Support
PBS Implementation
LogicLEADERSHIP TEAM
SCHOOL-WIDE
Build DataSystem
Establishmeasurable
outcome
Collect, analyze, &prioritize data
Ensure efficient,accurate, & durable
implementation
Implement
Monitorimplementation &
progress
Selectevidence-based
practice
What does SWPBS look like?
• Work in teams of 2-3 (13 minutes)
• List observable/measurable features that indicate SWPBS being implemented in school
• Report 2-3 planned activities from your team action planning (1 min.)
AttentionPlease
1 MinuteSpokesperson
What does PBS look like?SW-PBS (primary)• >80% of students can tell you
what is expected of them & give behavioral example because they have been taught, actively supervised, practiced, & acknowledged.
• Positive adult-to-student interactions exceed negative
• Function based behavior support is foundation for addressing problem behavior.
• Data- & team-based action planning & implementation are operating.
• Administrators are active participants.
• Full continuum of behavior support is available to all students
Secondary & Tertiary
• Team-based coordination & problem solving
• Local specialized behavioral capacity
• Function-based behavior support planning
• Person-centered, contextually & culturally relevant
• District/regional behavioral capacity
• Instructionally oriented
• Linked to SW-PBS practices & systems
• School-based comprehensive supports
Nonclass
room
Setting S
ystems
ClassroomSetting Systems
Individual Student
Systems
School-wideSystems
Research to Practice
School-wide Systems
1. Common purpose & approach to discipline
2. Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors
3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior
4. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior
5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging inappropriate behavior
6. Procedures for on-going monitoring & evaluation
Classroom Management Systems
• Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged
• Teaching classroom routines & cues taught & encouraged
• Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adult-student interaction
• Active supervision
• Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors
• Frequent precorrections for chronic errors
• Effective academic instruction & curriculum
Nonclassroom Systems
• Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged
• Active supervision by all staff– Scan, move, interact
• Precorrections & reminders
• Positive reinforcement
Individual Student System• Behavioral competence at school & district
levels
• Function-based behavior support planning
• Team- & data-based decision making
• Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes
• Targeted social skills & self-management instruction
• Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations
Behavior Support Elements
Problem Behavior
Functional Assessment
Intervention & Support Plan
Fidelity of Implementation
Impact on Behavior & Lifestyle
*Response class*Routine analysis*Hypothesis statement*Function *Alternative behaviors
*Competing behavior analysis *Contextual fit*Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes*Evidence-based interventions
*Implementation support*Data plan
*Continuous improvement*Sustainability plan
• Team-based• Behavior competence
Data Base for Study
• 145 elementary schools across four states in Center database– 89 at SET criterion (80% or higher)
• Not randomized sample– All schools exposed to SWIS
– All at different levels of implementation
– Not enough middle/high school data
Therefore, conservative (“tough”) sample
Initial Findings: Lower suspension rates generally for all kids in SW-PBS schools
• Across all schools, OSS rates 2x higher for kids on IEPs
• In non SW-PBS schools, OSS rates 2x higher
• In SW-PBS schools,
– 48% lower OSS rate for IEP kids
– 33% lower OSS rate for non-IEP kids
Implications of Establishing SW-PBS Processes & Systems
• School climate enhanced for all students when school-wide PBS in place
• Students with IEPs benefit when school-wide PBS in place
Agreements
Team
Data-based Action Plan
ImplementationEvaluation
GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
How do I keep track of all this stuff?
Useful Tools
• Coaches’ Implementation Checklist (Form C)
• Team Implementation Checklist – Rev (Form A)
• Implementation Phases Inventory (IPI)
• School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET)
MD Team Implementation Checklist(Rev Form A)
Establish Commitment
1. Administrator support & active involvement
– Attends meetings 90% of the time
– Provides funding for PBIS activities
– Puts time on staff agenda for PBIS updates
– Actively promotes PBIS as priority, integrates with other initiatives/improvement activities
2. Faculty/Staff support (One of top 3 goals, 80% of faculty document support, 3 year timeline)
– Climate/Discipline one of top 3 school improvement goals
– Faculty feedback is obtained throughout year
– Faculty involved in some decision making/establishing goals
– Admin/faculty commits to PBIS for at least 3 years
Establish & Maintain Team
3. Team established (representative)– Includes: grade level teachers, special area,
paraprofessionals, parents, special ed, school counselor, non classroom monitors,
– Has established a clear mission/purpose
4. Team has regular meeting schedule, effective operating procedures– Agenda is used, coach is notified of meeting time,
admin present to approve activities/decisions
5. Committee/Workgroup review completed/updated annually– PBIS team has clearly defined
objectives/outcomes
Initiative, Project,
Committee
Purpose Outcome Target Group
Staff Involved
SIP/SID/etc
Attendance Committee
Character Education
Safety Committee
School Spirit Committee
Discipline Committee
DARE Committee
EBS Work Group
Working Smarter
Initiative, Committee
Purpose Outcome Target Group
Staff Involved
SIP/SID
Attendance Committee
Increase attendance
Increase % of students attending daily
All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee
Goal #2
Character Education
Improve character Improve character All students Marlee, J.S., Ellen
Goal #3
Safety Committee Improve safety Predictable response to threat/crisis
Dangerous students
Has not met Goal #3
School Spirit Committee
Enhance school spirit
Improve morale All students Has not met
Discipline Committee
Improve behavior Decrease office referrals Bullies, antisocial students, repeat offenders
Ellen, Eric, Marlee, Otis
Goal #3
DARE Committee Prevent drug use High/at-risk drug users
Don
EBS Work Group Implement 3-tier model
Decrease office referrals, increase attendance, enhance academic engagement, improve grades
All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee, Otis, Emma
Goal #2
Goal #3
Sample Teaming Matrix
Self-Assessment
6. Team/faculty complete PBIS survey (completed annually)
– Self Assessment is used to write annual action plan
– Results are shared with staff.
7. Team summarizes existing school discipline data.
8. Strengths, areas of immediate focus & action plan are identified.
– Schedule/plans for teaching staff discipline & data system are developed
– Team makes it easy for staff to implement & responds to feedback
– Schedule for rewards/incentives for the year is planned
– Plans for orienting incoming staff & students are developed
– Plans for involving families & community are developed
Establish School-wide Expectations
9. 3-5 school-wide behavior expectations are defined & posted in all areas of building.
– Expectations apply to both staff & students
– Posters are similar, paired with icon & highly visible
10. School-wide teaching matrix developed.
– Rules developed for specific settings
– Rules are linked to expectations
School-Wide Expectations - continued
11. Teaching plans for school-wide expectations are developed.
– A behavioral curriculum includes concept & skill level instruction
– Lessons include examples & non-examples
– Strategies for use by families/community are developed
– Faculty/staff & students are involved in development
12. School-wide behavioral expectations taught directly & formally.
– Lessons are embedded into subject area curriculum
– Schedule/plans for teaching staff lesson plans for students are developed
– Booster sessions for students & staff are scheduled/planned
Establish On-Going System for Rewarding Behavioral Expectations
13. System for rewarding student behavior is established.
– Rewards are linked to expectations
– Rewards are varied to maintain student interest
– System includes opportunities for naturally occurring reinforcement
– Ratios of reinforcement to corrections are high
– Students are involved in identifying/developing incentives
– The system includes incentives for staff/faculty.
Establish System for Responding to Behavioral Violations
14. Staff & administration agree on what problems are office managed & what problems are staff managed.
– Behaviors defined
– Clearly identified major/minor behaviors
– Suggested array of appropriate responses to minor (classroom managed behaviors)
– Suggested array of appropriate responses to major (office managed) behaviors
– Clearly defined & consistent consequences & procedures for undesirable behaviors are developed
– Process includes documentation procedures
Establish Information System
15. Discipline data are gathered, summarized, reported to staff, & used to make decisions.– Data collection is easy, efficient, relevant
– Add’l data collected (attendance, grades, faculty attendance, surveys)
– Data entered weekly (minimum)
– Data analyzed monthly (minimum)
– Data shared with team & faculty monthly (minimum)
– Office referral form lists: (a) student/grade, (b) date/time, (c) referring staff, (d) problem behavior, (e) location, (f) persons involved, (g) probable motivation, & (h) consequences
Build Capacity for Function-based Support
16. Personnel with behavioral expertise are identified & involved.
– At least one individual on the PBIS team who has training or experience in behavior support including practical foundations, data collection & analysis, design & implement comprehensive plans
17. Plan developed to identify & establish systems for teacher support, functional assessment & support plan development & implementation
– Students identified through multiple data sources, teacher/parent request
– Teachers feel supported by SW team-response time to request within 24hours
– Focus of support is preventative, educative, functional, data based, empirically valid, collaborative and tied to SW, classroom & individual support programs
Build District Level Support
18. Allocate money for building & maintaining school-wide behavioral support.
– PBIS is high on list of priorities
– Activities, printing costs, FTE are funded adequately
19. Identify facilitator (coach) who connects the school with district-wide PBIS efforts, attends team meetings & provides technical assistance.
20. Write professional development plan for increasing technical skills in area of PBS & team-work.
– School data drives professional development plan, training topics & schedule is embedded within annual action plan
– Other initiatives are integrated with PBIS
On-going Activity
1. PBS team has met at least monthly.
2. PBS team has given status report to faculty at least monthly.
3. Activities for PBS action plan implemented
4. Accuracy of implementation of PBS action plan assessed.
5. Effectiveness of PBS action plan implementation assessed.
6. PBS data analyzed & shared with school staff.
Office Discipline Referral Information
1. # Office Discipline Referrals (ODR)
2. # Suspensions
SWIS.org
MD Coaches’ Checklist (Form C)
Team Activities
1. Administrator is active & present for meetings.
2. Team is making progress on PBIS “Getting Started” checklist (Form A).
3. Team uses school discipline & related data to discuss monthly progress.
4. Team uses annual action plan to discuss monthly progress
5. Team provides monthly updates/data summaries to entire school staff.
6. Team meetings are effectively run (e.g., clear objectives, tasks, goals).
7. Team activities are coordinated with other school initiatives & committees.
Coaching Activities
• FTE allocated & sufficient enough to complete tasks
• Consistently attend team meetings.
• Assist team with data-based decision-making, planning, & implementation.
• Attend regional/state coaches meetings & trainings.
• Send information to PBIS State/District Coordinator (e.g., checklists, action plans, etc.)
• Assist with dissemination activities (e.g., presentations, case studies, articles, etc.)
Implementation Phases Inventory (IPI)
• 2x year to assess PBS implementation
• 3 main phases (*critical elements)
– Preparation
– Initiation
– Implementation
– Maintenance
• Overall implementation score obtained based on total item points (Not, Partial, Full)
Before Team Training1. Review Coaching Implementation Checklist (C)
2. Verify coaching role with Coordinator
3. Review coaching role with Principal
4. Review status of team: principal, grade level representatives, special educator, counselor, parent, classified staff members (Committee Review)
5. Ask team to bring discipline data, behavior incident reports, office discipline referral forms, school discipline policy, procedures for teaching school-wide behavior expectations, procedures for encouraging SW expectations, etc.
6. Review tools: Team Implementation Checklist (A), EBS Self-Assessment Survey, Committee Review, Implementation Phases Inventory (IPI), Action Planning
During Team Training
1. Remind team of coaching role
2. Let team lead process
3. Document agreements
4. Keep team on task & reinforce progress
5. Remind team of big ideas (“refrigerator magnets”) from presentations
6. Remind team to include all staff
7. Prompt outcomes: Team Implementation Checklist, Team Action Plan, Committee Review, EBS Self-assessment Survey
After Team Training1. Acknowledge/reinforce principal & team for progress at training
2. Prompt team to – Meet & review PBS purpose & action plan with staff
– Collect school data
– Meet w/in 1 month
– Complete Team Implementation Checklist 1 month later
3. Contact team leader 2x in first month & ask – What is planned
– if assistance needed
4. Set schedule to attend team meeting 1x month
5. Monitor & assist in development & completion of team action plan
6. Review/complete Coaches Implementation Checklist
7. Document team & coaching accomplishments, speed bumps, challenges, solutions
Challenges/GuidelinesChallenges
• <80% staff commitment & agreement
• Lack of/too much administrative support
• Too many/too few meetings
• Conflicting perspective
• Kids/families responsibility
• No/bad data
• In-/out-house coaching
• Inefficient meetings
• Competing initiatives
Guidelines
• Use data
• Acknowledge/reinforce approximations
• Focus on team
• Provide/use exemplars
• Conduct functional assessment
• Contextualize evidence-based practice
• Consult with coordinator &/or state leadership team
• Model desired practice
Tools (pbis.org)
• EBS Self-assessment
• TIC: Team Implementation Checklist
• SSS: Safe Schools Survey
• SET: Systems School-wide Evaluation Tool
• PBS Implementation & Planning Self-assessment
• ISSET: Individual Student Systems Evaluation Tool (pilot)
• SWIS: School-Wide Information System (swis.org)
Recommended