Survivable Telecommunication Network Design Under Different Types of Failures

Survivable Telecommunication Network Design Under Different Types of Failures

Hanan Luss and Richard T. Wong

Presented by Huan-Ting Chen, OPLab, IM, NTU2007/3/19

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS—PART A: SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, VOL. 34, NO. 4, JULY 2004

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 2

Author

- Hanan Luss received the the Ph.D. degree in operations research from the University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia, in 1973.- He is an Adjunct Professor at Columbia University, New York.

- Richard T. Wong received the Ph.D. degrees from the Cambridge, 1978.- He is currently a Senior Operations Research Analyst with United Parcel Service.

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 3

Outline

Introduction - Principal Issues for Survivable Network Design - Message of Paper Three approaches - Under Partial Link Failure - Under Link Failure - Under Node Failure Conclusions

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 4

Outline

Introduction - Principal Issues for Survivable Network Design - Message of Paper Three approaches - Under Partial Link Failure - Under Link Failure - Under Node Failure Conclusions

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 5

Introduction

Principal Issues for Survivable Network Design

- Reroute the traffic of a failure of a network element - Restoration protocols

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 6

Introduction

Message of Paper - Augmenting capacities - Under a single failure

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 7

Outline

Introduction - Principal Issues for Survivable Network Design - Message of Paper Three Approaches - Under Partial Link Failure - Under Link Failure - Under Node Failure Conclusions

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 8

Three Approaches

Three different scenarios - Restoration under a single partial link failure - Restoration under a single link failure - Restoration under a single node failure

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 9

Under Partial Link Failure

Augments network capacity Under a single partial link failure - A link component failed on one link

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 10

Notation

G(N , A) A network with a set of nodes N and a set of

links A .

i,j,k,l Indices for nodes. Links are denoted by their end nodes, e.g., link (i , j) .

C

Capacity of a single-link component. All link components have the same capacity. Each component on link (i , j) provides capacity of C units from i to j and of C units from i to j .

s(i , j) Spare capacity on link (i , j) .

f(i , j)The maximal traffic that can be routed from node i to j (or from node j to i ), using spare capacities in G(N , A) .

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 11

Under Partial Link Failure Guarantees the network will survive a single

partial link failure on any link of G(N , A). Goal - Constructs a spanning tree V(N , A) where each link (i , j) V(N , A) has f(i , j) C.

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 12

Under Partial Link Failure

[C – s(k,l) ] + [s(k,l) – s’(k,l) ] = C – s’(k,l)

C – s’(k,l) Traffic units that need be rerouted.

s(k,l) – s’(k,l)Traffic units that can be absorbed by the remaining spare on other components of link (k,l).

C – s(k,l)

Traffic units that can be routed between nodes k and l using spare capacity on paths comprised of other links.

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 13

Under Partial Link Failure

6

7

6

6

10

10 10

Add (1,4) and (1,5) to the spanning treeAdd capacity C to (1,3) and add it to the spanning tree

7

7

10

Add capacity C to (1,2) and add it to the spanning tree

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 14

Under Partial Link Failure

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 15

Under Link Failure

Augments network capacity Under a single link failure

g(i , j) ： Traffic on link (i , j) that needs to be restored in the event that link (i , j) A fails.

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 16

Under Link Failure

3

4

2

15

2

1

1

22

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 17

Under Link Failure

3

4

2

15

Add C to these links and decrease the original g(i,j) by 1

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 18

Under Link Failure

3

4

2

15

1 1

1

0

0

Two subnetworks

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 19

Under Link Failure

3

4

2

15

Add C to these links and decrease the original g(i,j) by 1

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 20

Under Link Failure

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 21

Under Node Failure

Augments network capacity Under a single node failure Construct a restoration ring

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 22

Notation

t(i,i1,i2…..il

.j)

Transit traffic between end nodes i and j which is routed through intermediate nodes i,i1,i2…..il.j.

t(i , j)Aggregated transit traffic between end nodes iand j over all routes.

N(il)The set { t(i,i1,i2…..il.j) } (with the corresponding traffic volumes) that use node il

as an intermediate node.

RThe set of nodes that are the origin/destinationof some transit traffic that needs to be restoredin the event of some node failure.

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 23

Under Node Failure

t(1,4) = 4

t(3,5) = 2

t(1,3) = 1

t(1,2,3,4) = 1t(1,3,4) = 1t(1,5,4) = 2

t(1,2,3) = 1

t(3,4,5) = 2

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 24

Under Node FailureN(3) = {t(1,2,3,4) , t(1,3,4)}

t(1,2,3,4) =1 is reroute on link (1,4)

Update N(3) = {t(1,3,4) =1}

N(4) = {t(3,4,5) }

t(3,4,5) =1 is reroute on link (3,5)

Update N(4) = {t(3,4,5) = 1}

N(5) = {t(1,5,4)}

t(1,5,4) =1 is reroute on link (1,4)

Update N(5) = {t(1,5,4) = 1}

N(2) ＝ {t(1,2,3,4) , t(1,2,3)}t(1,2,3,4) =1 is reroute on link (1,4) (1,4) + 1

t(1,2,3) = 1 is reroute on link (1,3) (1,3) + 1

Update N(2) ＝

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 25

Under Node Failure

11

1

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 26

Under Node Failure

After one iteration the updated traffic value are

t (1,4) = 2 t (3,5) = 1

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 27

Under Node Failure

11

1

N(3) ＝ {t(1,3,4) }

t(1,3,4) =1 is reroute on link (1,4) (1,4) + 1

Update N(3) =

N(4) = {t(3,4,5) }t(3,4,5) =1 is reroute on link (3,5) (3,5) + 1

Update N(4) ＝

N(5) = {t(1,5,4)}

t(1,5,4) =1 is reroute on link (1,4)

Update N(5) =

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 28

Under Node Failure

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 29

Outline

Introduction - Principal Issues for Survivable Network Design - Message of Paper Three approaches - Under Partial Link Failure - Under Link Failure - Under Node Failure Conclusions

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 30

Conclusions

The goal of this paper is to present several survivable designs by augmenting capacities along prudently selected variants of spanning tree and ring structures.

Future work may evaluate the designs by comparing the results to those obtained by other heuristics.

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 31

Thanks for your listening

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 32

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 33

Consider a network with multiple disconnected subnetworks and suppose a spanning tree can be constructed on the complementary graphs of subnetworks m = 1 , 2 . The number of links comprising the two spanning trees is less than the number of links of a spanning tree on the complementary graph of a subnetwork that is the union of the two.

Consider two disconnected subnetworks. A spanning tree always exists on the complementary graph of a subnetwork that is the union of the two.

112/04/22 OPLab, IM, NTU 37

Under Partial Link Failure C – s’(k,l) : traffic units need be rerouted. s(k,l) – s’(k,l) : traffic units can be absorbed

by the remaining spare on other components of link (k,l).

C – s(k,l) : traffic units can be routed between nodes k and l using spare capacity on paths comprised of other links.

[C – s(k,l) ] + [s(k,l) – s’(k,l) ] = C – s’(k,l)