Supportive Peer Feedback in the Digital Environment · Text References • American Association of...

Supportive Peer Feedback in the Digital Environment

Do you look forward to peer reviews? Can you inspire your colleagues and students to look forward to peer reviews?

Peer Review Guidelines

•  Appropriately Leveled •  Practice focused •  Routine and expected •  Inspires continuous learning •  Not anonymous •  Developmentally staged

The Five Facets of Supportive Feedback

Peer Review Ideals

Viewgraphicexternally:h2ps://u.osu.edu/peerreview/

Paradigm

•  Uniform set of standards •  Available prior to review •  Act as “decider” •  Relative weights for each standard

Process

•  Voluntary or mandated? •  How is it initiated? •  Is there a coordinator? •  How many peers on one review? •  Anonymous or open? •  Any action required?

Preparation

•  Reviewers trained to provide supportive feedback

•  Reviewees trained to receive feedback in a healthy way

Digital feedback tools

•  iPeer •  Survey systems •  PeerMark (part of TurnItIn) •  Some textbook publishers provide tools •  Google “peer review online tool”

Using iPeer

•  Why we use it •  How it helps our students and faculty •  Lessons learned

Mission

Weexisttorevolu;onizehealthcareandpromotethehighestlevelsofwellnessindiverseindividualsandcommuni;esthroughoutthena;onandglobethroughinnova;veandtransforma;onaleduca;on,researchandevidence-basedclinicalprac;ce.CollegeofNursingCoreGoalsandValues

Questions

•  Contact information – Joni Tornwall: tornwall.2@osu.edu – Lizzie Fitzgerald: fitzgerald.118@osu.edu

Image References •  Cedim News. (2012) “Master in Business Innovation.” (CC BY-NC 2.0)

Retrieved May 26, 2015 from https://www.flickr.com/photos/cedimnews/6848060833/

•  Munch, E. (1893). "The Scream.” WebMuseum, Paris. Ibiblio. Retrieved May 20, 2015 from http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/munch/

Text References •  American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2015). The Essentials of Master’s Education for Advanced Practice

Nursing. Retrieved from: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/MasEssentials96.pdf •  American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. Retrieved from:

http://www.nursingworld.org/DocumentVault/Ethics_1/Code-of-Ethics-for-Nurses.html •  American Nurses Association. (1988). Peer review guidelines. Kansas City, MO: The Association •  American Sentinel University Healthcare. (2014). What is nursing peer review? Retrieved from

http://www.americansentinel.edu/blog/2014/01/15/what-is-nursing-peer-review/ •  ANCC. Magnet Designation Program. (2015). Retrieved from:

http://www.nursecredentialing.org/Magnet/ResourceCenters/MagnetResearch/MagnetDesignation.asp •  Benner, P.E. (2013). From novice to expert. Retrieved from

http://currentnursing.com/nursing_theory/Patricia_Benner_From_Novice_to_Expert.html •  College of Registered Nurses of British Columbia. (2015). Peer feedback: Learning from each other. Retrieved from:

https://www.crnbc.ca/QA/Documents/peerfeedback.pdf •  Foltos, L. J. (2013). Peer Coaching : Unlocking the Power of Collaboration. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin. Retrieved

from http://www.ebrary.com •  George, V., and Haag-Heitman, B. (2012). Differentiating peer review from the annual evaluation. Retrieved from

http://nursingconsultingpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/differentiating-peer-review-nurse-leader.pdf •  Haag-Heitman, B & George, V. (2011). Peer review in Nursing: Principles for successful practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones

and Bartlett. •  Haag-Heitman, B & George, V. (2011). Nursing peer review: Principles and practice. American Nurse Today, 6(9), 48-52. •  Mantesso, J., Petrucka,P., & Bassendowski, S. (May, 2008). Peer feedback. The Journal of Continuing Education in

Nursing 39.5: 200-205; quiz 206-207, 240. •  Media Health Leaders. (2010). Nursing peer review: A means to improvement. Retrieved from: •  http://healthleadersmedia.com/print/NRS-255253/Nursing-Peer-Review-A-Means-to-Improvement •  Texas Board of Nursing. (2015). Practice-Peer Review: Incident-Based or Safe Harbor. Retrieved from: •  http://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_peer_review.asp •  Wood, D. (2015). Peer review offers opportunities to improve nursing care. Retrieved from:

http://www.nursezone.com/Nursing-News-Events/more-features/Peer-Review-Offers-Opportunities-to-Improve-Nursing-Care_29908.aspx

•  No author. (2, November 2007). Giving constructive feedback. Nursing Times. Retrieved from:http://www.nursingtimes.net/giving-constructive-feedback/215184.article#