Supporting Emergent Literacy Development in Students who are Deafblind NCDB Topical Conference May...

Supporting Emergent Literacy Development in Students who are Deafblind

NCDB Topical Conference May 13, 2008

Amy R. McKenzie, Ed.D.Florida State UniversityProgram in Visual Impairments

Presentation Outline

• Literacy Defined • The Fundamental Truths• Barriers to Literacy

Development• Research Findings• Recommendations

Emergent Literacy Defined

Emergent literacy is the process of developing literacy that begins at birth and ends when children begin to engage in conventional or functional reading and writing (Sulzby & Teale, 1991)

Literacy and Student who are DB

• Students with deafblindness may or may not attain conventional literacy skills

• However, many students with deafblindness will attain functional literacy skills

• Additionally, communication is often the primary need for this student population

Literacy and Students who are DB• …literacy is communication

especially when the concepts and issues are applied to students with visual impairments and additional disabilities. In this respect, then, literacy is the most basic foundation for all learning, for receiving and imparting information, and for initiating interactions with others. (Langley, 2000)

The Fundamental Truths

The Fundamental Truths

The following “fundamental truths” are borrowed from

Alan Koenig & Cay Holbrook’s keynote presentation at the Getting in Touch with Literacy Conference in Philadelphia 2001

The Fundamental Truths

1. Every child who is deafblind has the right to attain literacy to the greatest extend of his or her abilities.

The Fundamental Truths

2. All students who are deafblind have the right to literacy instruction from qualified personnel, including a teacher of students with visual impairments, a teacher of students who are deaf or hard of hearing, and a deafblind specialist.

Barriers to Literacy Development for Students who are Deafblind

Barriers to Literacy Development

1. The “low incidence” nature of deafblindness– This is a numbers issue!

Barriers to Literacy Development

2. The lack of knowledge about deafblindness of general educators, special educators, and related service providers – This is a preservice training

issue!

Barriers to Literacy Development

3. The limited knowledge and skills for working with students who are deafblind of teachers of students with visual impairments & teachers of the deaf and hard of hearing– Again, this is a preservice

training issue!

Barriers to Literacy Development

4. The limited supply of qualified personnel to work with students who are deafblind– This is a preservice funding

issue!

Barriers to Literacy Development

5. The limited or lack of knowledge regarding the unique needs and literacy needs of students who are deafblind by administrators, departments of education, and legislatures– This is an advocacy issue!

Barriers to Literacy Development

6. The lack of curricular publications and materials for literacy instruction of students who are deafblind– This is a low-incidence

issue!

Barriers to Literacy Development

7. The belief that many students who are deafblind are “nonreaders” – This is an awareness issue!

Barriers to Literacy Development

8. A lack of research! – This is a field-wide issue!

Emergent Literacy Supports for Students who are Deafblind:

Research Findings

Study Background Information• Qualitative, multiple case

study involving 4 schools • 6 classrooms for students

with deafblindness or visual impairments

• 18 student participants – Ages ranges from 3.25-21.8

years; mean age of 11.3 years

• 100% had additional disabilities

Study Background InformationData collected: • Environmental Supports• Teaching Strategies &

Activities • Assessment Reports• IEP Goals & Objectives• IEP Accommodations &

Supplementary Aids/Service

Environments and Activities

• On average, 46% of the environmental characteristics supported by el research were observed

• On average, 51% of the teaching strategies and activities supported by el research were observed

• See Table 1 & 2

Assessment Reports

• 100% eye reports • 100% audiologist reports • 94% FVE • 11.1% LMA• 64.7% Communication

Assessment (Partial) • 55% O&M Evaluations

IEPs

• 27.6% of goals – communication

• 14.2% of goals – literacy • 24.2% of

accommodations – communication

• 22.7% of accommodations – literacy

Other Significant Findings

• In 5 of the 6 classrooms, the “print rich” environment was inaccessible to the students who are deafblind

• The most “academic” classroom displayed the fewest characteristics supported by the el research

Other Significant Findings

• All related service providers reported supporting emergent literacy development

• All paraprofessionals reported supporting emergent literacy development

Other Significant Findings

• Discrepancies between classroom teacher interviews, observations, and IEP reviews existed

• All classroom teachers reported being a “facilitator” of literacy development

• Two classroom teachers reported their students were nonreaders

Other Significant Findings

• One classroom teacher graduated from a deafblind training program; no other classrooms had contact with such trained professionals

• One classroom had contact with a teacher of the deaf & hard of hearing

Other Significant Findings

• Two classroom teachers were trained as teachers of students with visual impairments; no other classrooms had access to a teacher of students with visual impairments

Recommendations

Emergent Literacy Practices

• Continue and increase the use of age appropriate environmental characteristics and activities that support emergent literacy development

• Increase the use of accommodations for access to environmental print in student’s assessed learning media

Emergent Literacy Practices

• Increase the use of learning media assessments (LMAs) for students who are deafblind

• Decrease the use of the terminology “nonreader” when referring to students in the emergent literacy phase of literacy development

Practices in the Field

• Include information on deafblindness in preservice and inservice training for general educators, special educators, and related service providers

Practices in the Field

• Increase information on the literacy needs of students who are deafblind in preservice and inservice training of teachers of students with visual impairments and teachers of the deaf & hard of hearing

Practices in the Field

• Increased advocacy for funding to existing and new preservice programs training deafblind specialists

Practices in the Field

• Increased advocacy to bring about awareness of administrators, departments of education, and legislatures regarding the unique literacy needs of students who are deafblind

Practices in the Field

• Increased demand for and creation of literacy curricular materials for students who are deafblind

Practices in the Field

• RESEARCH! – First, we need to build a

foundation of knowledge regarding current practices and standards

– Next, we need to expand intervention-based research regarding current and new practices and standards

Contact Information

Amy R. McKenzie, Ed.D.Assistant ProfessorProgram in Visual

ImpairmentsCollege of EducationFlorida State Universitymckenzie@coe.fsu.edu 850-645-6588