View
3
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Study of electrocatalysis in solid oxide fuel cells using well-defined model
electrode structures
WooChul Jung
Advisor: Sossina M. Haile
Caltech
Sep. 19, 2012, TUDelft
2
Electrode inefficiency dominates in thin-electrolyte IT-SOFC
O2-
H2
O2
Cathode Electrolyte Anode
e-
H+
V
Separate oxidative and
reductive steps of combustion
Oxide ions diffuse through
solid-oxide electrolyte
Electrons forced through
external circuit
Result: efficiently converted
chemical energy into electricity
Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Basics
IT SOFC: intermediate-temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
3
Gas accessibility
Ionic pathway
Electronic pathway
Electro-catalysis
O2 + 2e → O2 1 2
Gases
Electrode Reactions
Cathode :
H2 + O2 → H2O + 2e Anode :
Electronic species Ionic species
4
Challenges in SOFC Electrode Research O2
Electronic
e-
O2-
Electrolyte O2-
O2
Triple phase boundary (3PB)
Surface Pathway
Ionic or MIEC
Ionic phase
e.g., doped zirconia or ceria
perovskite ferrite or cobalite
(MIEC: Mixed Electronic & Ionic Conductor)
Electronic phase
e.g., metals or (La,Sr)MnO3
Pores
Image from J.R. Wilson, et al. Nature Materials 2006, 5, 541.
5
Challenges in SOFC Electrode Research
Electronic
e-
Electrolyte
O2
e-
e-
O2-
O2-
Double phase boundary (2PB)
Bulk pathway
Ionic or MIEC
Ionic phase
e.g., doped zirconia or ceria
perovskite ferrite or cobalite
(MIEC: Mixed Electronic & Ionic Conductor)
Electronic phase
e.g., metals or (La,Sr)MnO3
Pores
Image from J.R. Wilson, et al. Nature Materials 2006, 5, 541.
6
Challenges in SOFC Electrode Research
Electronic
Electrolyte
Ionic or MIEC
Ionic phase
e.g., doped zirconia or ceria
perovskite ferrite or cobalite
(MIEC: Mixed Electronic & Ionic Conductor)
Electronic phase
e.g., metals or (La,Sr)MnO3
Pores
Image from J.R. Wilson, et al. Nature Materials 2006, 5, 541.
+ + + + + + + - - - - - -
+ +
+
+ + + + +
+
Adsorbate layer
Surface layer
Space charge layer
Bulk
Chemical & Morphological Complexities
+
Multiple, Simultaneous Reactions
+
Difficulties in Surface Characterizations
7
• The relative activities of the various
reaction sites?
• Dominant reaction pathway?
• Characteristics of surface properties?
• Rate determining step? Factors
governing reaction rate?
Conventional Approach
Optimize materials & microstructure
A complex system is not well
understood:
Trial-and-Error
Develop model systems
Design materials &
microstructures
Decouple multi-phase
reaction-diffusion interactions
Bottom-Up Approach
Fabricate devices
Optimization of Electrode
Identify rate governing factors
+
/26
Ceria
Ceria
S.P. Yoon, et al. J. Power Source. 2002, 106,160.
S.P. Jiang, et al. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2003, 6, A67.
S.P. Jiang, et al. J. Mater. Sci. 2004, 39, 4405.
K. Eguchi, et al. Solid State Ion. 1992, 52, 165.
T. Tsa , et al. Solid State Ion. 1997, 98, 191.
T. Tsa , et al. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1998, 145, 1696.
K. Eguchi, et al. Solid State Ion. 1992, 52, 165.
T. Setoguchi, et al. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1992, 139, 2875.
C. Lu, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150, A1357.
Example1
Enhanced performance in the presence of Ceria
8
H2 + O2 → H2O + 2e
CeO2
9
Metal
Ceria
1 2 3
Metal
Ceria
Metal
Ceria
Reaction rate at metal | ceria | gas sites
Reaction rate at ceria | gas sites
Electronic conductivity of ceria
Metal Pathway
Limited
Ceria Surface
Limited
Lateral Electron
Diffusion Limited
Material Properties
3PB Site Density
2PB Site Density
Inter-metal distance
Microstructural Parameters
Ionic conductivity of ceria
Gas Gas Gas
Probing Coupled Surface Reaction-Diffusion
In courtesy of W.C. Chueh for this slide
10
Ceria Thin Film
Ionic Conducting Sub.
Patterns interconnected
Approach: Patterned Thin Film Model Electrodes
Varying metal-catalyzed
reaction site density (d3PB)
Ceria surface area (d2PB) held constant
Varying d2PB
d3PB held constant
In courtesy of W.C. Chueh for this slide
Monitoring Technique for Reaction Rate:
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)
11
YSZ (100)
SDC
SDC
Metal
Metal
YSZ (100)
Sm0.20Ce0.80O1.9-d (SDC)
SDC
Y0.16Zr0.84O1.92
(YSZ) (100)
Pulsed-Laser
Deposition Metal
Patterning
By Liftoff
Lithography
Post testing 72 hours 500 – 600 °C in H2
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150
SDC Thinfilm (200)
(°)
Inte
nsity (
Arb
.)
YSZ Substrate (200)
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
YS
Z (
11
0)
SD
C (
11
0)
Inte
nsity (
Arb
.)
2 (°)
20 22 24 26
Inte
nsity (
Arb
.) (°)
Fabrication Route
Nature Materials 2012, 11, 155. In courtesy of W.C. Chueh for this slide
12
Activity of Different Reaction Sites
Fixed reaction rate
regardless of d3PB
Reaction rate is linearly
dependent on d2PB
Nature Materials 2012, 11, 155.
102
103
10-3
10-2
10-1
d3PB
/ cm-1
pH2O = 0.0058 atm (Pt)
1/R
ele
ctr
od
e
/
-1 c
m-2
1
102
103
10-3
10-2
10-1
d3PB
/ cm-1
pH2O = 0.0058 atm (Pt)
0.0030 atm
0.0015 atm
0.00078 atm
1/R
ele
ctr
od
e
/
-1 c
m-2
1
102
103
10-3
10-2
10-1
0.0051 atm (Ni)
0.0026 atm
0.0013 atm
0.00065 atm
d3PB
/ cm-1
pH2O = 0.0058 atm (Pt)
0.0030 atm
0.0015 atm
0.00078 atm
1/R
ele
ctr
od
e
/
-1 c
m-2
1
0.1 1
10-3
10-2
10-1
d2PB
pH2O = 0.0057 atm
0.0015 atm
0.0029 atm
0.00076 atm
1/R
ele
ctr
od
e
/
-1 c
m-2
1
13
Lateral Electron Diffusion
Ceria
YSZ
Ceria
YSZ
seon = 0.1 -1cm-1, k2PB = 0.1 -1cm-2, L=10-4 cm, Cchem=500 Fcm-3
Increasing
inter-metal
distance
In courtesy of W.C. Chueh for simulations
14
Metal
Ceria
1 2 3
Metal
Ceria
Metal
Ceria
Metal Pathway
Limited
Ceria Surface
Limited
Lateral Electron
Diffusion Limited
Gas Gas Gas
X X O 1.3 x 102 to 2.0 x 103 cm/cm2
0.06 to 0.75 cm2/cm2
3PB Site Density
2PB Site Density
Inter-metal distance: 5 to 120 mm
3PB / 2PB (this work): ~ 4 x 103 cm-1
*Commercial SOFCs: ~ 2 x 104 cm-1
Implications of Technological Applications
*: J. R. Wilson, et al. Nature Materials 2006, 5, 541.
15
Rational Fuel Cell Electrode Design
Ceria Metal
Electrolyte
Pulsed Laser Deposition
(PLD)
16
2 mm
PLD
Energy & Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8682.
17
500 nm
PLD
Energy & Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8682.
18
2 – 3 % H2O + 97 – 98 % H2
High Electrode Activity
0.8 1.0 1.2 1.410
-2
10-1
100
101
102 1000 900 800 700 600 500
1
/ R
ele
ctr
od
e
/
c
m-2
1000 T -1
/ K -1
Pure SDC
Temperature / oC
Energy & Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8682.
19
O2
Electronic
e-
O2-
Electrolyte O2-
O2 O2
e-
e-
O2-
O2-
Ionic or MIEC
Example2-1
Identifications of rate determining steps
Important role of electron transfer to oxygen species!
O2 + 2e → O2 1
2 Complicated Nature of ORR
/27
– Perovskite solid solution, Mixed Ionic Electronic Conductor (MIEC)
– Stable over wide pO2 range
– Well studied electronic structure, defect and transport properties
– Controllable magnitudes and ratios of se and sion
Rothschild, A, Tuller, H.L., et al., Chem. Mater, 18, 3651 (2006)
SrTi1-xFexO3-d (STF)
1 atm 10-20 atm
Stable & Controllable Model Materials
20
21
Reaction Rate vs. Bulk Conductivity
– Well-defined electrode geometry 2PB limited Pathway
– Moderate sel and sion are sufficient (i.e., ~ 10-3 S/cm for STF5)
– Other factors likely control the surface exchange kinetics.
Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 1184.
YSZ
STF
Area
TPBL
STF
LSCF
330 S/cm
LSCF
22
Reaction Rate vs. Fermi Level Position
Important role of availability of electronic species!
Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 1184.
23
Remaining Questions:
Investigation of Surface Properties
+ + + + + + + - - - - - -
+ +
+
+ + + + +
+
Adsorbate layer
Surface layer
Space charge layer
Bulk
Bulk Materials Properties Surface Reaction Rate
24
Example2-2
Cation Surface Segregation
Energy & Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5370.
XPS surface analysis
Ratio of Sr to (Ti + Fe) is always higher than unity.
Fe to Ti ratio stays the same between the surface
and bulk.
Sr excess increases with increasing Fe content.
/27
25
Dynamic Nature of Sr Segregation
Energy & Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5370.
– Amount of Sr excess can be controlled by chemical etching
– Etched STF surface provides enhanced surface exchange kinetics
– Sr re-segregates upon high temperature annealing
26
In-situ characterizations
In collaboration with Prof. Bilge Yildiz (MIT)
27
Surface SrO Segregation
Cation segregation
Electronic structure Chemistry
Oxygen exchange
rate
Energy & Environ. Sci.
2012, 5, 7979.
28
Other research efforts toward
In-situ characterizations
Scattering techniques
(x-ray, photoelectron, neutron)
Spectroscopy techniques
(electron, infra-red, Raman)
Surface adsorption Surface oxygen and electronic defects.
Q.-H. Wu, et al., Surface Review and Letters, 2007 14, 587. W.C. Chueh, et al., Chem. Mater., 2012 24,1876.
29
Neutron Scattering in Fuel Cell Research
• Crystal (local) structure
(Neutron Diffraction)
• Reaction products (Neutron Diffraction)
• H+ or H2O dynamics & distribution (Quasi-Elastic Neutron Scattering, Small Angle Neutron Scattering, Neutron Radiography)
• Morphologies of Nano/Microstructure (Neutron Radiography, Neutron Activation Analysis, SANS)
Surface Sensitive, In-situ Characterizations
• Grazing incidence (or Near Surface) SANS, Neutron Reflectometry
• Nanostructures with high surface-to-volume ratio
Target: Surface adsorbates (concentration & dynamics), Structural
& Chemical evolution near surface, etc.
Global Climate and Energy Program
(Stanford University)
Acknowledgements
Supervisor: Prof. Sossina Haile (Caltech)
Collaborators: Prof. Harry Tuller (thesis advisor, MIT)
Prof. Bilge Yildiz (MIT)
Prof. William Chueh (Stanford)
Dr. Yong Hao (IET, China)
Recommended