Strand I: Using Intensive Intervention to Meet the Academic and Behavior Needs of Struggling...

Strand I: Using Intensive Intervention to Meet the Academic and Behavior Needs of Struggling Learners

Strand Leaders: Louis Danielson, Ph.D. Rebecca O. Zumeta, Ph.D. National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII)American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC  

2

Understand strategies for identifying, intervening, and evaluating progress of students with intensive intervention needs in academics, specifically in reading and mathematics.

Understand strategies for identifying, intervening, and evaluating progress of students with intensive behavioral needs.

Discuss common implementation challenges when planning for intensive intervention.

Strand Objectives

Today’s Sessions(Download slides at www.intensiveintervention.org)

Time Session Title Presenters 8:00–9:00 a.m. Addressing the Needs of Students

With Persistent Math Difficulties Through Intensive Intervention

Lynn Fuchs, Sarah Powell, and Rebecca Zumeta

9:15–10:15 a.m. Addressing the Needs of Students With Persistent Reading Difficulties Through Intensive Intervention

Doug Fuchs, Devin Kearns, and Laura Magnuson

10:30–11:30 a.m. Planning Function-Based Interventions for Students With Intensive Behavior Needs

Gail Chan, Lori Newcomer, and Joseph Wehby

1:30–2:30 p.m. Confronting Implementation Challenges When Providing Intensive Intervention

Lou Danielson, Allison Gandhi, Chris Lemons, and Rebecca Zumeta

3

Addressing the Needs of Students With Persistent Math Difficulties Through Intensive Intervention

Lynn S. Fuchs, Ph.D., Vanderbilt UniversitySarah R. Powell, Ph.D., University of Texas at Austin Rebecca O. Zumeta, Ph.D., AIR

Rationale for intensive intervention Overview of the data-based individualization (DBI) process Methods for intensifying instruction in mathematics Case example Time for questions

Today’s Presentation

5

6

Intensive intervention addresses severe and persistent learning or behavior difficulties. Intensive intervention should be: Driven by data Characterized by increased intensity (e.g., smaller group,

expanded time) and individualization of academic instruction and/or behavioral supports

What is Intensive Intervention?

Is… Individualized based on

student needs More intense, often with

substantively different content AND pedagogy

Comprised of more frequent and precise progress monitoring

Is Not… A single approach A manual A preset program More of the same Tier 1

instruction More of the same Tier 2

instruction

What Intensive Intervention…

7

Low academic achievement

Dropout rates

Arrest rates

Why Do We Need Intensive Intervention?

8

More Help

Validated programs are not universally effective programs; 3 to 5 percent of students need more help (Fuchs et al., 2008; NCII, 2013).

More Practice

Students with intensive needs often require 10–30 times more practice than peers to learn new information (Gersten et al., 2008).

Why Do We Need Intensive Intervention?

9

10

Students with disabilities who are not making adequate progress in their current instructional program

Students who present with very low academic achievement and/or high-intensity or high-frequency behavior problems (typically those with disabilities)

Students in a tiered intervention system who have not responded to secondary intervention programs delivered with fidelity

Who Needs DBI?

11

Data-Based Individualization (DBI): A systematic method for using data to determine when and how to provide more intensive intervention: Origins in data-based program modification/experimental teaching

were first developed at the University of Minnesota (Deno & Mirkin, 1977).

It is a process, not a single intervention program or strategy. It is not a one-time fix, but an ongoing process comprising intervention

and assessment adjusted over time.

What is NCII’s Approach toIntensive Intervention?

Students with disabilities who require special education need specially designed instruction to progress toward standards.

A data-driven, systematized approach can help educators develop programs likely to yield success for students with intensive needs.

DBI Assumptions

12

DBI is a distinctively different and more intensive approach to intervention, compared to primary prevention’s (Tier 1’s) core program and secondary prevention’s (Tier 2’s) validated, supplementary programs (NCII, 2013).

In a longstanding program of field-based randomized controlled trials, DBI has demonstrated improved reading, math, and spelling outcomes, compared with business-as-usual special education practice (e.g., Fuchs, Fuchs, & Hamlett, 1989).

DBI Assumptions

13

14

1. Secondary intervention program, delivered with greater intensity

2. Progress monitoring3. Diagnostic assessment4. Adaptation5. Continued progress monitoring, with adaptations

occurring as needed to ensure adequate progress

Five DBI Steps

A Bird’s Eye View of DBI

15

16

Many components of DBI are consistent with elements of special education and tiered service delivery systems.

Is DBI the Same as RTI?Special Education?

Tiered Interventions(RTI, MTSS, PBIS) Universal, secondary, and

tertiary interventions Progress monitoring Team-based decisions based

on data

Special Education Individualized program Progress monitoring Team-based decisions based

on data

Intensive Intervention in Mathematics

17

Smaller Steps

Precise Language

Repeat Language

Student Explains

Modeling

Manipulatives

Principles for Intensive InterventionWorked Examples

Repeated Practice

Error Correction

Fading Support

Fluency

Move On

18

Use a task analysis to break problems into smaller steps

19

Smaller Steps

Look at the first fraction. Multiply the numerator and denominator by the denominator of the second fraction. Rewrite.

Look at the second fraction. Multiply the numerator and denominator by the denominator of the first fraction. Rewrite.

Write addition and equal signs.

Add numerators and rewrite denominator.

Reduce fraction to lowest terms (when necessary).

Generate a list of important vocabulary with student-friendly definitions

Provide directions and instruction with precise language• Instead of saying, “The denominator is the bottom number,” say:

20

Precise Language

The denominator is the whole divided into equal parts.

Repeat important vocabulary and definitions, algorithms, and steps for problem solving

21

Repeat Language

Whenever you need to solve a word problem, even a word problem with fractions, use the mnemonic RIDE.

R tells you to Read the problem. I tells you to Identify important information. D tells you to Determine the operation. E tells you to Enter the correct numbers and solve.

Students explain their thinking in their own words. Helps the teacher check for understanding of concepts,

correct use of vocabulary, and understanding of procedures.

Teacher may need to model talk-alouds and give the student opportunities for practice with feedback.

22

Student Explains

In this problem, I multiply both the numerator and the denominator by 5.

Now, look at the next problem. Explain to me your multiplication.

Model concepts and procedures

23

Modeling

To find a common denominator, I multiply the numerator and denominator of the first fraction by the denominator of the second fraction. The denominator of the second fraction is 3, so I multiply by 3.

So, the numerator of the first fraction is 2. We multiply 2 times 3. What’s 2 times 3? (6) I write 6 here.

The denominator of the second fraction is 9. We multiply 9 times 3. What’s 9 times 3? (27) I write 27 here.

Use manipulatives to demonstrate concepts and procedures

24

Manipulatives

Provide a worked example to promote discussion of how the work was completed

25

Worked Examples

3

8

1

3+ =

924

824

+ =1724

Provide multiple opportunities for repeated practice of skills

Examples:• Practice finding common denominators for addition and subtraction using

multiplication• Practice multiplication facts• Practice discriminating between addition of fractions and multiplication of

fractions

26

Repeated Practice

Provide error correction for mistakes in the student’s work

27

Error Correction

Let’s look at this part again. You need to multiply both the numerator and denominator by 4.

The numerator is 2. What’s 2 times 4? (8) Yes. 2 times 4 is 8. Write 8 here.

The denominator is 5. What’s 5 times 4? (20) Yes. 5 times 4 is 20. Write 20 here.

Begin fading support as the student becomes more confident with a skill

28

Fading Support

Remember to multiply by the denominator of the second fraction. Go ahead and try it on your own.

Provide opportunities to build fluency with a skill

29

Fluency

Let’s practice our multiplication facts so that finding common denominators is quick and easy.

When the student demonstrates proficiency with a task, it is time for the teacher to move on.

30

Move On

You’ve learned how to add and subtract fractions with unlike denominators, so now let’s learn how to multiply fractions.

31

Sixth-grade student Individualized education program goal in mathematics:

Given 25 problems from the fifth-grade curriculum, Molly will write 44 correct digits in answers in six minutes by the end of the school year.

Meet Molly

32

33

34

35

36

Visit www.intensiveintervention.org for: Tools charts to identify intervention and progress-monitoring

tools in academics and behavior DBI Training Series Webinars (Live webinar April 29, 2014 @ 3 pm EDT) Sample adapted activities and supplemental materials Ask the Expert videos Reports Newsletter

NCII Resources

Tools Charts

37

DBI Training Series

38

• Slides and speaker notes

• Activities • Coaching

guides

Webinars

39

Live webinar April 29, 2014 at 3 pm Eastern.

Sign up and join our mailing list: www.intensiveintervention.org

Sample Activities and Materials

40

41

Generally effective programs are not universally effective programs—some students require more intensive support.

DBI comprises assessment and intervention practices tailored to meet students’ individual learning needs.

Specific mathematics instructional strategies, combined with regular progress monitoring, can enhance learning for students with intensive needs.

In Summary

Aud, S., Hussar, W., Johnson, F., Kena, G., Roth, E., Manning, E., Wang, X., & Zhang, J.. (2012). The condition of education 2012 (NCES 2012-045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012045.pdf

Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Minneapolis, MN: Leadership Training Institute for Special Education..

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989). Effects of instrumental use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 43–52.

Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 79–92.

Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide.aspx?sid=3

References

42

National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The Nation’s Report Card: A first look: 2013 mathematics and reading (NCES 2014-451). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2013

National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2013). Data-based individualization: A framework for intensive intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education.

Planty, M., Hussar, W., Snyder, T., Provasnik, S., Kena, G., Dinkes, R., KewalRamani, A., & Kemp, J. (2008). The condition of education 2008 (NCES 2008-031). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008031.pdf

Sanford, C., Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A.-M., & Shaver, D. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school. Key findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3004). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://www.ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20113004/pdf/20113004.pdf

References

43

National Center on Intensive Intervention1000 Thomas Jefferson Street NWWashington, DC 20007-3835

www.intensiveintervention.org

Email: ncii@air.org

44

Questions?

NCII Disclaimer

This presentation was produced under the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Award No. H326Q110005. Celia Rosenquist serves as the project officer. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or polices of the U.S. Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this website is intended or should be inferred.