View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Module 4 of 4, September 3, 2020
Page 1
NJ DEP Division of Water Quality, Online Stormwater Management Design Review Course
REVIEWEXAMPLE 3
Brian SalvoNJDEP Division of Water Quality
SWMDR Training Module 4September 3, 2020
1
PLAN
Presentation Goals
• Review site plans and stormwater management report
• Identify any errors with the design• Suggest potential solutions
Goals
2
Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards
• Stormwater Control Ordinance for Municipality• Amount of Disturbance• Tidal Water Body Discharge
o Water Quantity is required?• Urban Redevelopment Area
o Ground Water Recharge is required?• Increase in Impervious Coverage
o Water Quality is required?
Which standards are required?
3
Module 4 of 4, September 3, 2020
Page 2
NJ DEP Division of Water Quality, Online Stormwater Management Design Review Course
Familiarize Yourself with the Site
• Important in determining the requirements
• Existing land cover
Where are the pre-construction conditions?
4
5
Pre-Development Site
Stormwater Management Report
Existing CoverageCoverage Item AreaParking Lot, Roof, Driveway 258 sfLawn 66,224 sf
Proposed CoverageCoverage Item AreaParking Lot, Roof, Driveway 37,064 sfLawn 29,418 sf
6
Module 4 of 4, September 3, 2020
Page 3
NJ DEP Division of Water Quality, Online Stormwater Management Design Review Course
7
Post-Development Site
Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards
• Stormwater Control Ordinance for Municipality• Amount of Disturbance• Tidal Water Body Discharge
o Water Quantity is required?• Urban Redevelopment Area
o Ground Water Recharge is required?• Increase in Impervious Coverage
o Water Quality is required?
Which standards are required?
8
Soil Logs
9
Module 4 of 4, September 3, 2020
Page 4
NJ DEP Division of Water Quality, Online Stormwater Management Design Review Course
WATER QUANTITY
10
Engineer’s Claim
The discharges of the proposed stormwater management systems will result in no increases, as
compared to the pre-construction condition, in the peak runoff rates of stormwater leaving the site for
the two, 10, and 100 year storm events and that the increased volume or change in timing of stormwater
runoff will not increase flood damage at or downstream of the site, therefore, the project meets
the water quantity standard.
11
Peak Flow Rates
Existing ConditionDrainage
Area2-Year Storm
10-Year Storm
100-Year Storm
EAST 0.40 cfs 0.82 cfs 1.66 cfsWEST 0.34 cfs 0.70 cfs 1.43 cfs
SOUTH 0.51 cfs 1.04 cfs 2.12 cfs
Drainage Area 2-Year Storm
10-Year Storm
100-Year Storm
DA-1 (EAST) 0.37 cfs 0.65 cfs 1.31 cfsDA-2 (SOUTH) 0.46cfs 0.79 cfs 1.42 cfs
Proposed Condition
12
Module 4 of 4, September 3, 2020
Page 5
NJ DEP Division of Water Quality, Online Stormwater Management Design Review Course
Difference in Peak Discharges
1st Street Runoff Reduction Table – EAST vs. DA-1 (EAST)Storm EAST DA-1 (EAST) Difference in Peak Discharges
2-year 0.40 cfs 0.37 cfs -0.03 cfs (92.5%)
10-year 0.82 cfs 0.65 cfs -0.17 cfs (79.3%)
100-year 1.66 cfs 1.31 cfs -0.35 cfs (78.9%)
Acorn Avenue Runoff Reduction Table – SOUTH vs. DA-2 (SOUTH)Storm SOUTH DA-2 (SOUTH) Difference in Peak Discharges
2-year 0.51 cfs 0.46 cfs -0.05 cfs (90.2%)
10-year 1.04 cfs 0.79 cfs -0.25 cfs (76.0%)
100-year 2.12 cfs 1.42 cfs -0.70 cfs (67.0%)
13
Curve Numbers
14
Volume
1st Street Volume Reduction Table – EAST vs. DA-1 (EAST)Storm EAST DA-1 (EAST) Difference in Volume
2-year 2,581 cf 10,747 cf +8,166 cf
10-year 5,199 cf 18,316 cf +13,117 cf
100-year 10,634 cf 33,182 cf + 22,548 cf
Acorn Avenue Volume Reduction Table – SOUTH vs. DA-2 (SOUTH)Storm SOUTH DA-2 (SOUTH) Difference in Volume
2-year 3,310 cf 2,352 cf -958 cf
10-year 6,669 cf 4,011 cf -2,658 cf
100-year 13,640 cf 7,273 cf -6,367 cf
15
Module 4 of 4, September 3, 2020
Page 6
NJ DEP Division of Water Quality, Online Stormwater Management Design Review Course
GROUNDWATER RECHARGE
16
Engineer’s Claim
Soil test pits were performed in the vicinity of each stormwater management basin. The soil logs show
that the existing soil is primarily clay, with low permeability. The clayey soils restrict groundwater
recharge. Therefore, groundwater recharge has not been provided for this project.
17
Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards
• Stormwater Control Ordinance for Municipality• Amount of Disturbance• Tidal Water Body Discharge
o Water Quantity is required?• HSG D Soils
o Ground Water Recharge is required?• Increase in Impervious Coverage
o Water Quality is required?
Which standards are required?
18
Module 4 of 4, September 3, 2020
Page 7
NJ DEP Division of Water Quality, Online Stormwater Management Design Review Course
WATER QUALITY
19
20
Proposed Condition
21
Stormwater Management Basin Detail
Module 4 of 4, September 3, 2020
Page 8
NJ DEP Division of Water Quality, Online Stormwater Management Design Review Course
Forebay?
22
23
Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth)
Hazards
24
Module 4 of 4, September 3, 2020
Page 9
NJ DEP Division of Water Quality, Online Stormwater Management Design Review Course
Contact Information
25
Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution ControlDivision of Water Quality
401 East State StreetPO Box 420, Mail Code 401-2B
Trenton, NJ 08625-420Tel: 609-633-7021
www.njstormwater.org
Brian SalvoBrian.Salvo@dep.nj.gov
Recommended