View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Welcome
Advancing The Hampton Roads Economy
December 10, 2018
Specific Regional Opportunities
Agenda
2
III. Regional Economic Performance
Hampton Roads is blessed with an incredible set of key assets
3
REGIONAL ASSETS
Virginia’s Global Gateway
Broadband
Military & Federal Presence
Public & Private Higher Education
Infrastructure Expansion
4
REGIONAL ASSETS
Tourism, Arts, Culture Workforce
Research Capabilities
Location & Climate
Diversity of Place
Regional Economic Performance: DESPITE OUR RICH ASSET BASE, THE REGIONAL ECONOMY HAS
UNDERPERFORMED THE STATE, COMPETITOR REGIONS, AND THE US
ECONOMY FOR MANY YEARS.
6
PEAK TO TROUGH TO PEAK EMPLOYMENT GROWTH
Current Employment Volatility
(8,300) Jobs Lost March to May
Average Monthly Loss: -.36% mirroring
the 1990-91 & Great Recession
Decelerations
730
740
750
760
770
780
790
Source: Economic Research Division, St. Louis Federal Reserve- Data shown through May 2017, Seasonally Adjusted
Recession
Peak Employment: July 2007
Employment = 781,600
May 2016 – May 2017 Job
Change
(1,900)
12-month percent change May
2016 – May 2017
-.25%
12,500 Jobs shy of pre-recession peak
Previous Period: 3 Months
Consecutive Decline
Average Monthly Loss: -.08%
The 2007-2009 Recession and its Recovery through December 2016
4.96%
4.30%
-1.79%
-8%
-4%
-6%
0%
-2%
2%
4%
6%
Ch
an
ge
from
Pre
-Rec
essi
on
Peak
% Change in Total Non-farm Payroll Employment from Pre-Recession Peak
Months After Pre-Recession Peak
USA VA HR
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110
Pre-Recession Peak Dates: U.S.: January, 2008 Virginia: April, 2008
Hampton Roads: July, 2007
Hampton Roads 105.0
United States, 112.6
Virginia, 108.9
Baltimore, 110.8
Richmond, 112.9
Jacksonville, 120.1
Raleigh, 125.0
Charlotte, 125.4
Nashville, 132.3
95.0
100.0
105.0
110.0
115.0
120.0
125.0
130.0
135.0
Q2 2009 Q2 2010 Q2 2011 Q2 2012 Q2 2013 Q2 2014 Q2 2015 Q2 2016 Q2 2017 Q2 2018
Quarterly Job Growth
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Data shown through Q2 2018, Seasonally Adjusted
Indexed Growth
Three-Year Gross Product Growth in Hampton Roads and Reference MSAs
0.8%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
An
nu
ali
ze
d C
ha
ng
e i
n G
ro
ss
P
ro
du
ct
(20
14
- 2
017
)
Metropolitan Areas with Population between 1 and 4 Million
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and HRPDC
Three-Year Employment Growth in Hampton Roads and Reference MSAs
1.1%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
An
nu
ali
ze
d C
ha
ng
e i
n
Em
plo
ym
en
t (2
013
- 2
016
)
Metropolitan Areas with Population between 1 and 4 Million
U.S. Metro Area Average is 2.23%
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and HRPDC
A Business-Led Statewide Initiative
To Grow and Diversify the Private Sector In Each Virginia Region
IV. Growth and Opportunity Program: “GO VA”
12
What is GO Virginia?
A bipartisan, business-led, game-changing initiative…
That will provide a new framework for Strengthening the economy in each Virginia region…
Through enhanced collaboration by
business, education, and local government…
Go Virginia Purpose Statement
“Create more higher paying jobs through Incentivized collaboration, primarily through
out-of-state revenue, which diversifies and strengthens the economy in every region”
13
14
Virginia’s Economic Climate Federal tax reform has significantly improved state fiscal
picture
Unemployment at historic lows
Average compensation for newly created jobs still lags pre-recession totals
Many Virginia regions still have not recovered all the jobs that existed pre-recession
Virginia still lags national economic trends
Virginia has structural and historical barriers that inhibit economic growth and cooperation
15
What are Virginia’s structural Problems?
Unique structural challenges related to independent cities and Dillon Rule
Region is the organizing unit of the economy-and Virginia
has historically not thought this way
Instead of collaborating on economic development, localities have been competing
(often with no net gain to the state economy)
16
Go Virginia-Implementation
• 29 Projects approved for $12M in state funds
• Provided funding for enhanced capacity building for future
collaborations
• All projects must show collaboration between at least two
localities
• Leveraged nearly $20M in additional funds (1:1 outside match
required)
• 20% local match required – need to have skin in the game to
effect real change
17
lllllllllllllllkdlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllvvvvvvvvvvv
18
Growth and Opportunity (GO) Grants:
Potential Projects
Priority Clusters
Scale-ups of existing Small and Medium
Sized Businesses
Credentialing and Talent Development
Commercialization of R&D (Public and
Private)
Enhanced Star-Up and Initiatives and
Collaborations
Joint Site Development and
Economic Development
Projects
19
GO Virginia – Talent Pipeline
The Problems
• Low unemployment
• Flight of talent to other states with “better opportunities and equity- VA lost 14,000 highly educated 25+ year olds in past 5 years
• Questionable data on actual employment gaps
• Mismatch between needs of business and degree/credentialing/training efforts
Potential Strategies
• Systematic assessment of employers’ needs for talent
• Match talent with employment opportunities
• Promote more education-to-employment pipelines (apprenticeships and internships)
• Align curriculum and programs with business needs
20
The Problems
• Insufficient number of sites to capitalize on major capital investment opportunities
• Sites that exist are not shovel ready
• Data on existing sites is incomplete
• Lack of cooperation among localities
Potential Strategies
• Systematic regional and statewide site inventory
• Demand analysis to prioritize site development
• Fund infrastructure that moves sites closer to being shovel ready
• RIFAs and other contractual obligations to share costs and revenues
GO Virginia – Site Development
21
The Problems
• Virginia ranks 22nd of 25 large states in startup activity
• Venture capital growth 1/3 of national average
• New companies that leave create 50% more jobs than the ones that stayed
• Commercialization lags national peers
• 77% of university R&D licenses in 2017 were out-of-state companies
Potential Strategies
• Regional “quarterback” to coordinate and align entrepreneurship efforts
• Statewide backbone services to support the most promising business ventures
• Statewide seed fund
• Strong focus on most promising sectors for Virginia – cyber, big data, life sciences, IoT
GO Virginia – Entrepreneurship
22
The Problems
• Often misunderstood, few national models
• Uncoordinated activities to help companies survive valley of death
• Growing our own companies leads to larger, sustainable clusters
Potential Strategies
• Growing our own companies leads to larger, sustainable clusters
• Augment supply chains around successful enterprises
GO Virginia – Scale Ups
23
VI. Reinvent Hampton Roads
Background
Hampton Roads Community Foundation convenes examination of our region’s comparative economic underperformance
Involved 100+ individuals focused on key areas: Leadership Industry Clusters Entrepreneurship Workforce Development
Partners with Brookings Institution’s Metropolitan Policy Program
25
Conclusion
We need to fundamentally alter the region’s economic profile and performance over time.
Create more and higher paying jobs
Create a culture where entrepreneurship can thrive
Diversify the economy
26
Reinvent Hampton Roads
Reinvent Hampton Roads
Established January 2016
A business-led frame for game-changing work that will fundamentally alter the region’s economic profile and performance over time
Funded by: • Hampton Roads Community Foundation
• Go Virginia (Commonwealth of Va.)
• Port of Virginia
• Hampton Roads Business Roundtable
• Individual Support
• HREDA & GPNow (1st year)
28
Our mission:
• To create and grow more higher paying traded sector jobs in Hampton Roads
• By creating a strategy that embraces both the traditional and emerging employment sectors in Hampton Roads. We will improve the region's economic profile by attracting new entrepreneurs, innovative industries, and high-paying employment opportunities.
Our approach:
• Be comprehensive: Region is a system of systems • Partner with others: Stress alignment • Focus on actionable solutions
29
Board of Directors
JOHN O. DUBBY” WYNNE (CHAIR) G. ROBERT ASTON, JR. (VICE CHAIR)
ROBERT CRUM JOHN LAWSON
HARRY LESTER JENNIFER R. BOYKIN
KEVIN MURPHY DEBORAH M. DICROCE
BOB SASSER JOHN REINHART
RONY THOMAS THOMAS FRANTZ
RICK WEDDLE ALAN WITT
HOWARD KERN
30
31
Growth and Opportunity
32
Go Virginia Region 5 Council
Thomas R. Frantz, Chair
Anne C. H. Conner, Vice Chair
Kenneth Alexander Robert McKenna Shawn Avery Jerry Miller
Patrick Coady J.D. Myers, II
Timothy J. Bentley John Olson
Bruce Bradley McKinley Price
John R. Broderick John F. Reinhart
John T. Dever Katherine Rowe
William B. Downey Jeffery Smith
Robert “Bobby” Dyer Bryan Stephens
Jack L. Ezzell, Jr. Bruce Thompson
Michael Gentry Thomas G. Tingle
Maria Herbert Gary Warren
Jeffrey Holland
Jim Kibler
33
REGION 5
GO VIRGINIA CURRENT PROJECTS
Virginia Cyber
Alliance
757 Seed Fund
Virginia Digital
Shipbuilding
Hampton Roads
Unmanned Systems Facility
Drivers for Economic Growth and higher paying jobs
34
Based upon sound research
Recognition of long-term nature or issues – no “silver bullet” or quick fix
Collective Impact model
Collaboration
Communication
Alignment of many efforts and initiatives
Conclusion
35
Thank you!
Questions &
Comments
Visit our website www.reinventhr.org
Connect with our network and like our showcase page on and us on
36
15 Minute Break
37
VI: Next Gen Leadership:
Leadership for Strategic Change in Economic Development
The Dilemma: While Next Gen Leaders are involved in worthy projects and lead many community boards; with some exceptions, they are not leading our most important strategic, economic development initiatives
Next Gen Leadership
39
Why is this important?
• In every community and every organization, the development of future senior leadership is the No 1. predictor of sustained success.
• Managers are important to deliver current results, but leaders think through needed strategic change, and then motivate and align the right people to pursue this change.
Next Gen Leadership
40
Why is this important? (cont.)
• People who are comfortable with and are good at leading change are a minority of well intended citizens.
• Think of this as Community Leadership Succession.
Next Gen Leadership
41
The Objective • To persuade, motivate, and support more
of our Next Gen Leaders (you and others) to assume responsibility for our high priority, strategic economic development opportunities.
• Explained earlier, the criticality of economic development.
• We can identify great projects, but unless led through implementation and success, ideas are not worth much.
Next Gen Leadership
42
• Participation and working with others for the benefit of the community at any level is worthy and helpful, but leading the most important strategic changes is most challenging, potentially impactful areas is what will elevate our community the most.
• Time, interest, and passion must combine.
Next Gen Leadership
43
Complexity of Volunteer Leadership • It is volunteer, not your business or family.
• Working with other volunteers-no real
control.
• Civic versus business standard of performance (can’t dabble and expect success).
• Need for team of volunteers and some dedicated resource to be successful.
Next Gen Leadership
44
Next Gen Leadership
Attributes of Strategic. Change Leaders
• Have shown commitment to the community. • Have achieved some success. • Respected by peers. • Have interest, even passion for the topic. • Senior enough that have flexible time to devote. • Power to convene. • Understands ability to persuade depends on
preparation. • Ability to marshal resources.
• Are these right? • What else?
45
Next Gen Leadership
Attributes of Strategic Change Leaders (Audience Answers)
• Pick a lane (recognized experts to move things forward). • Prepare to hear “no” • Competency/skill sets/achieve and execute • Good sense of timing • Support next gen via sponsorship by current leaders
(mentoring) • Be open and create opportunity for talent • Longer term commitment • Convey vision • Sacrifice time
45
Next Gen Leadership
Attributes of Strategic Change Leaders cont. Why do this? (Audience Answers)
• Pride for our community • Creating a better place for our children
45
Next Gen Leadership
Why haven’t we met our Objective?
46
Next Gen Leadership
Attributes of Strategic Change Leaders cont. Why haven’t we met the objective? (Audience Answers)
• Structural Change (corporate leadership) • Competing priorities/coordination and alignment • Sharing of ideas and the possible risks associated • Inability to function as one region • Partnership with Govt. with the purpose of improving the live
of all citizens
45
Next Gen Leadership
What can we do about it? Is it even possible to be this purposeful about this topic or should
we allow it to be serendipitous?
47
Next Gen Leadership
Many older senior leaders are willing to sponsor, help recruit, mentor, and advise as needed, but we want to move into the background and be available as needed. Put the right people in place and get out of the way.
48
VII. Overview of Specific Regional Opportunities
dkdkdkdkdk
49
Regional Specific Opportunities Origin
dkdkdkdkdk
50
Regional Specific Opportunities Descriptions
dkdkdkdkdk
51
Regional Specific Opportunities
Group I: Currently Underway
52
Jefferson Lab Expansion: Electron Ion Collider
Regional Branding
Hampton Roads Economic Development Alliance and the Structure of Reginal Economic Development
MEGA Region
Scale-Up of Small/Medium Enterprises
53
Jefferson Lab Expansion: Electron Ion Collider
54
Regional Branding
55
Hampton Roads Economic Development Alliance and the Structure of
Regional Economic Development
56
57
Scale-Up of
Small/Medium Enterprises
58
Group II: Ready to Pursue
Economic Development Sites
Entrepreneurial Eco-System
Military DoD/ Strategic Initiative
Broadband/Cyber/Big Data Analytics
Leadership
Workforce Development
Alternative Energy
Port Economic Development/Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics
Tourism
Bio-Science/Health
60
Economic Development Sites
61
Entrepreneurial Eco-System
62
Military/DoD Strategic Initiative
63
Broadband/ Cyber/Big Data
Analytics
65
Workforce Development
66
Alternative Energy
67
Port Economic Development/ Advanced Manufacturing/
Logistics
68
69
Bio-Science/ Health
VII. Regional Specific Opportunities
Examples
Developing Talent Pipelines Economic Development Sites HREDA/Regional Branding
Workforce Developing Talent
Pipelines
72
Few Examples of Sustained Talent Pipelines
Individual Companies
Phot cred. A Cowan,
74
Developing Talent Pipeline
Even more difficult in times of high employment.
Conundrums? • Why haven’t businesses been more
aggressive in addressing critical talent needs?
• Why haven’t business and education partnered more to solve this issue?
• Why hasn’t the state and our regional
efforts done more to address this challenge?
Developing Talent Pipeline
75
In Economic Development, all would agree that the critical key to improvement and success is proving that a targeted pipeline can be developed and sustained.
Developing Talent Pipeline
76
• Step 1: Systematic assessment of employer needs. Deep data dive to validate critical few job categories (higher paying jobs) that are needed the most now, and likely to be needed for years to come.
• Hampton Roads, with funding from HRCF, is doing that now.
Developing Talent Pipeline
77
• Focus on critical few, prove it can be successful-do not get spread too thin and try to solve for all categories. Match talent to highest employer needs.
• Remember, higher paying jobs create lower paying jobs. The opposite is not true.
Developing Talent Pipeline
78
• What is the prototypical model that should be pursued?
• Good examples are emerging-Amazon, NNS, etc.
Developing Talent Pipeline
79
• Historically, education and 4 year institutions especially have been siloed in these efforts.
• Responsibility is to properly educate, not focus on business needs, or even essential credentials needed for a successful career-computer science?
Developing Talent Pipeline
80
The Prototype: 1. Business and educators agree on content of
credential/degrees. Improve alignment. • Need to plan for one, excellent product
delivery, not 23 variations. • Need to plan for better use of online
components-Online Virginia Network Authority (ODU &GMU)
Developing Talent Pipeline
81
The Prototype: 2. Internships, apprenticeships, and
work study need to be discussed and put in place.
3. Addressing continuing education of existing workforce is important.
Developing Talent Pipeline
82
The Prototype: 4.Must create a pipeline of people
who can be persuaded to persuse these incentives: awareness, marketing, recruitment, and retention programs; economic incentives, etc.
5.Must have full-time resources devoted to leading this effort
Developing Talent Pipeline
83
The Prototype: 2. Internships, apprenticeships, and
course study need to be discussed and put in place.
3. Addressing continuing education of existing workforce is important.
Developing Talent Pipeline
84
Developing Talent Pipeline
Targeted Talent
Pipeline
Match To Next Generation Leadership
85
VII.Examples Economic Development Sites
Regional Economic Development
Sites Inventory
January 18, 2018
“You can’t sell from an empty wagon”
Sites Inventory Need
Major job-creating investments are won because of a pipeline of development-ready sites
Sites Inventory Need
“We have lost out on billions and billions of dollars and thousands and thousands of jobs … because we did not have development-ready sites prepared quickly enough to meet the company’s needs”
- Stephen Moret
Virginia Economic Development Partnership (VEDP)
Sites Inventory Need
“Over the last five to six years, we’ve had somewhere between 40 and 50 companies totaling about $6.5 billion in capital investment who have said the first reason they walk away from Virginia was site readiness”
- Todd Haymore
Former Secretary of Commerce & Trade
Sites Inventory Need
- Virginia has only half as many certified ready sites as North Carolina and one-third as many as Tennessee
- Lack of development-ready sites is the #1 reason Virginia loses projects to other states
- VEDP Site-Readiness Study
What Does “Shovel-Ready” Mean?
Virginia Business Ready Sites Program
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5
Ownership
Land Use
Sales Price
Zoning
Due Diligence
Infrastructure > 1 Year < 1 Year
What Does “Shovel-Ready” Mean?
Virginia Business Ready Sites Program - Tier 4
– Public ownership or willing seller
– Industrial or commercial land use designation
– Industrial or commercial zoning
– Due diligence studies complete
– Infrastructure in place or deliverable within 1 year
Building on a Strength
Small Sites
Large Sites - Over 100 Acres
Redevelopment Sites
Priority Industry Clusters
1. Logistics and Warehousing
2. Advanced Manufacturing
3. Cyber Security
4. Shipbuilding
5. Water Technologies
6. Unmanned Systems
Site Types
Building on a Strength
Advanced Manufacturing Project
Capital Investment: $325MM
Headcount: 650
Average Salary: $55,000
Evaluation Process
HRPDC Screening and VirginiaScan Listings
Ownership, Land Use, and Zoning
Utilities
Due
Diligence • >100-acre parcel
• Within public service areas
• < 50% wetlands or open water
• < 20% developed (impervious area)
Findings Placeholder
• Text
100-Acre Sites
Findings Placeholder
• Text
Appropriately Zoned Sites
Findings Placeholder
• Text
Shovel-Ready Sites
VII.Examples HREDA- Regional Branding
Status Report
Hampton Roads Economic Development Alliance
for Hampton Roads
Business Roundtable December 5, 2018
Current Approach to Regional Economic Development is not Working
• Not Aligned • Too Fragmented • Uncoordinated • Poorly Marketed • Not a True Partnership • Not Adequately Resourced
Conclusion: A New Local/Regional Relationship Needed
Business Attraction
by HREDA
Local Economic
Development Agencies
Local Economic
Development Agencies
Refocused HREDA
IBM/P L I Came to Same Conclusion
5
Transforming the HREDA Role to Enhance Business Growth
Current HREDA Focus
Marketing/promotion for inward investment
Lead generation
Business facilitation
Research and analysis
Recommended Future HREDA Direction Lead targeted pro-active marketing and promotion of Hampton Roads to investors and companies (in collaboration with VEDP and local EDOs), coupled with active business facilitation and support.
Function as the prime point of contact for companies and coordinator for promotion activities and support with other organizations and stakeholders.
Pro-actively support the indigenous growth of Hampton Roads companies through international promotion of capabilities
Act as facilitator for partnerships between inward investment firms and local companies and support regional efforts for industry-university collaboration for research, skills and cluster development.
Play a strong policy advocacy role towards cities, region organizations and Commonwealth government authorities in support of economic development.
Organize and support after care and investor/cluster development programs.
HREDA should become a pro-active marketing organization acting as catalyst for growth through integrated support and effective promotion, cluster
development and advocacy
Current activities are too focused on promotion, facilitation and support
HREDA should become a more pro-active and effective investment promotion agency in line with global best practice, working in close collaboration with VEDP and local EDOs.
HREDA should support indigenously grown sectors and help promote these capabilities internationally and help foster the growth of regional clusters in Hampton Roads
Emerging Economic Model
$1,849,084
$1,398,915
$1,212,250
$658,350
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$2,067,265 2017 Funding Outlook
$3,111,334 Peak Funding
$500,000
$- 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017
Public Funding Private Funding Other Budget Outlook
Total Funding Decline of $1,044,069 (33.6%). Private Decline $569,940 (46.4%). Public Decline $450,169 (24.3%)
Historical HREDA Funding Support by Source
•Mandate: Clear, specific and comprehensive regional mission and
mandate for New ED Model and action
•Support: Public endorsement, support and engagement of top public
& private leadership
•Overall Funding: Minimum of $2.35 per capita
•Revenue Mix: 50:50 public-private funding ratio
•Spending Mix: 50% or less committed to personnel expense
•Timeframe: 3-5 year program and funding commitment
•Evaluation: Measurable goals and annual performance targets
Requirements: Competitive Regional ED Model
$601,085
$1,341,650 $1,398,915
$658,350
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Public Funding Current Revenue
Private Funding Revenue Gap
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
Percent of Current Funding Compared to Proposed Funding
Revenue Gap at Competitive $2.35 Per Capita Funding
• $4 MILLION GOAL PER YEAR BEGINNING July 1, 2019
• 50% PRIVATE / 50% PUBLIC
• FUNDING STEPS UP OVER 3 YEARS
• HREDA BUDGET AND PRIVATE SUPPORT BASED ON CALENDAR YEAR
• PUBLIC SUPPORT ON JULY /JUNE FISCAL YEAR
• FUNDING STEP UP SCHEDULE
Proposed Funding: $20 million over 5 Years*
YEAR PRIVATE ADDT’L. $
TOTAL PRIVATE
ADDT’L. PUBLIC
TOTAL PUBLIC
TOTAL
2019 $.9 M $1.6 M $.26 M $1.6 M $3.2 M
2020 $1.1 M $1.8 M $.46 M $1.8 M $3.6 M
2021 $1.3 M $2.0 M $.66 M $2.0 M $4.0 M
*NOTES: • Assumes Regional Population of 1.7 million
• Adjustments may be necessary based on HREDA membership changes
Engaged Business Leadership and Proper Resourcing Required to
Achieve Results
Current Activities & Next Steps:
• December 5, 2018 Master Agreement to Business Roundtable and CAOs.
• December 13, 2018 Master Agreement to Full HREDA Board.
• By end of year, Comments received and final draft prepared.
• By end of year, interim HREDA President selected.
• January 2019 Establish Joint Public/Private Steering Committee to guide transformation.
• Once Master Agreement in place and first year funding secured, begin executive search for permanent president.
Significance of Proposed Direction:
• The public and private sectors must urgently and jointly address the chronic underperformance of the regional economy by putting in place a partnership founded on a new model of Economic Development that is aligned and adequately funded.
• If the recommended partnership is implemented, Hampton Roads will cease being the Commonwealth's most dysfunctional Economic Development region and become the most forward looking and collaborative.
Next Steps?
Recommended