View
105
Download
2
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Six Sigma and Statistical Quality Control. Outline. Quality and Six Sigma: Basic ideas and history Juran Trilogy Control Improvement Planning Quality Strategy Focus on Statistical Methods Process Capability ideas and metrics Control charts for attributes and variables. A Brief History. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Six Sigma andStatistical Quality
Control
Outline• Quality and Six Sigma: Basic ideas and history• Juran Trilogy
– Control– Improvement– Planning
• Quality Strategy• Focus on Statistical Methods
– Process Capability ideas and metrics– Control charts for attributes and variables
A Brief History• The Craft System• Taylorism (Scientific Management)• Statistical Quality Control
– Pearson, Shewhart, Dodge• Human Relations School
– Mayo, Maslow, Simon, Herzberg, Likert• The Japanese Revolution (1950)
– Ishikawa, Taguchi, Deming, Juran, Feigenbaum• The USA Wakes Up (1980)
– Crosby• 1990s: Six Sigma• The Need for Organizational Change
Operations -- Prof. Juran
4
JIT and TQM
Walter Shewhart1891 - 1967
W. Edwards Deming
1900 - 1993
Joseph M. Juran1904 - 2008
What is Quality?• Freedom from Defects
– Quality Costs Less– Affects Costs
• Presence of Features– Quality Costs More– Affects Revenue
Juran TrilogyPlanning, Control, Improvement
Juran Trilogy
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
Time
Defe
ct R
ate
Juran TrilogyPlanning, Control, Improvement
Juran Trilogy
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
Time
Defe
ct R
ate
Chronic Waste
Chronic Waste
Sporadic Spike
Planning Control ControlImprovement
Quality Control• Aimed at preventing unwanted
changes• Works best if deployed at the point of
production or service delivery (Empowerment)
• Tools:– Established, measurable standards– Measurement and feedback– Control charts– Statistical inference
Quality Control
Operate
Establish Standard
Corrective Action
Measure Performance
Compare to StandardOK?
Yes
No
Quality Improvement• Aimed at creating a desirable change• Two distinct “journeys”
– Diagnosis– Remedy
• Project team approach• Tools
– Process flow diagram– Pareto analysis– Cause-effect (Ishikawa, fishbone) diagram– Statistical tools
Quality Improvement• Identify problem• Analyze symptoms• Formulate theories• Test theories - Identify root
cause• Identify remedy• Address cultural resistance• Establish control
Quality Planning• Aimed at creating or redesigning
(re-engineering) a process to satisfy a need
• Project team approach• Tools
– Market research– Failure analysis– Simulation– Quality function deployment– Benchmarking
Quality Planning• Verify goal• Identify customers• Determine customer needs• Develop product• Develop process• Transfer to operations• Establish control
Strategic Quality Planning• Mission• Vision• Long-term objectives• Annual goals• Deployment of goals• Assignment of resources• Systematic measurement• Connection to rewards and
recognition
Strategic Quality Planning• Aimed at establishing long-range
quality objectives and creating an approach to meeting those objectives
• Top management’s job• Integrated with other objectives
– Operations– Finance– Marketing– Human Resources
Six Sigma Defined (High-Level)• The application of rigorous quantitative
tools in the planning, control, and improvement processes in an effort to meet customer requirements 100% of the time.
• Old wine in new bottles?
Process Capability• The Relationship between a
Process and the Requirements of its Customer
• How Well Does the Process Meet Customer Needs?
Process Capability• Specification Limits reflect what
the customer needs• Natural Tolerance Limits (a.k.a.
Control Limits) reflect what the process is capable of actually delivering
• These look similar, but are not the same
Specification Limits
• Determined by the Customer• A Specific Quantitative Definition
of “Fitness for Use”• Not Necessarily Related to a
Particular Production Process• Not Represented on Control Charts
Tolerance (Control) Limits• Determined by the inherent central
tendency and dispersion of the production process
• Represented on Control Charts to help determine whether the process is “under control”
• A process under control may not deliver products that meet specifications
• A process may deliver acceptable products but still be out of control
Measures of Process Capability
• Cp
• Cpk• Percent Defective• Sigma Level
Example: Cappuccino• Imagine that a franchise food service
organization has determined that a critical quality feature of their world-famous cappuccino is the proportion of milk in the beverage, for which they have established specification limits of 54% and 64%.
• The corporate headquarters has procured a custom-designed, fully-automated cappuccino machine which has been installed in all the franchise locations.
• A sample of one hundred drinks prepared at the company’s Stamford store has a mean milk proportion of 61% and a standard deviation of 3%.
Example: Cappuccino• Assuming that the process is in control and normally
distributed, what proportion of cappuccino drinks at the Stamford store will be nonconforming with respect to milk content?
• Try to calculate the Cp, Cpk, and Parts per Million for this process.
• If you were the quality manager for this company, what would you say to the store manager and/or to the big boss back at headquarters? What possible actions can be taken at the store level, without changing the inherent variability of this process, to reduce the proportion of non-conforming drinks?
Lower Control Limit
52
033613
...
LNTL
Upper Control Limit
70
033613
...
UNTL
Nonconformance
001036164
3320361542
1
../..Z../..Z
Nonconformance
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4values of z
Nonconformance• 0.00990 of the drinks will fall
below the lower specification limit.• 0.84134 of the drinks will fall
below the upper limit. • 0.84134 - 0.00990 = 0.83144 of
the drinks will conform.• Nonconforming:
1.0 - 0.83144 = 0.16856 (16.856%)
Cp Ratio
pC6
LSLUSL
0306540640
...
180100
.
.
5550 .
Cpk Ratio
pkC
33
LSL,USLmin
0303540610
0303610640
...,
...min
77703330 .,.min
3330 .
Parts per MillionPPM 16900000001 .,,
000169,
(about 1.38 Sigma)
1234
A B C D E F
Defects per million 169000
Sigma level 1.375424
=1000000*2*(1-NORMSDIST(B4))
Quality Improvement• Two Approaches:
– Center the Process between the Specification Limits
– Reduce Variability
Approach 1: Center the Process
Approach 1: Center the Process
Approach 1: Center the Process
671035964
671035954../..Z../..Z
USL
LSL
Approach 1: Center the Process
• 0.04746 of the drinks will fall below the lower specification limit.
• 0.95254 of the drinks will fall below the upper limit.
• 0.95254 - 0.04746 = 0.90508 of the drinks will conform.
• Nonconforming:1.0 - 0.90508 = 0.09492 (9.492%)
Approach 1: Center the Process
• Nonconformance decreased from 16.9% to 9.5%.
• The inherent variability of the process did not change.
• Likely to be within operator’s ability.
Approach 2: Reduce Variability
• The only way to reduce nonconformance below 9.5%.
• Requires managerial intervention.
Quality Control
Operate
Establish Standard
Corrective Action
Measure Performance
Compare to StandardOK?
Yes
No
Quality Control• Aimed at preventing and detecting unwanted
changes• An important consideration is to distinguish
between Assignable Variation and Common Variation
• Assignable Variation is caused by factors that can clearly be identified and possibly managed
• Common Variation is inherent in the production process
• We need tools to help tell the difference
When is Corrective Action Required?
• Operator Must Know How They Are Doing
• Operator Must Be Able to Compare against the Standard
• Operator Must Know What to Do if the Standard Is Not Met
When is Corrective Action Required?
• Use a Chart with the Mean and 3-sigma Limits (Control Limits) Representing the Process Under Control
• Train the Operator to Maintain the Chart
• Train the Operator to Interpret the Chart
Example: Run Chart
0.200
0.205
0.210
0.215
0.220
0.225
0.230
0.235
0.240
0.245
0.250
0.255
0.260
0.265
0.270
0.275
0.280
0.285
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
When is Corrective Action Required?
Here are four indications that a process is “out of control”. If any one of these things happens, you should stop the machine and call a quality engineer:• One point falls outside the control limits.• Seven points in a row all on one side of the
center line.• A run of seven points in a row going up, or a
run of seven points in a row going down.• Cycles or other non-random patterns.
Example: Run Chart
14.000
14.100
14.200
14.300
14.400
14.500
14.600
14.700
14.800
14.900
15.000
15.100
15.200
15.300
15.400
15.500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Type I and Type II Errors
In Control Out of ControlAssume Process is OK Correct Decision ERROR (Type II)Take Corrective Action ERROR (Type I) Correct Decision
When is Corrective Action Required?
One point falls outside the control limits.• 0.27% chance of Type I Error
Seven points in a row all on one side of the center line.
• 0.78% chance of Type I ErrorA run of seven points in a row going up, or a run of seven points in a row going down.
• 0.78% chance of Type I Error
Basic Types of Control Charts
Attributes (“Go – No Go” data)• A simple yes-or-no issue, such as “defective or not” • Data typically are “proportion defective”• p-chartVariables (Continuous data)• Physical measurements such as dimensions, weight,
electrical properties, etc.• Data are typically sample means and standard
deviations• X-bar and R chart
Statistical Symbols (Attributes)
n Number of observations in each sample
p Proportion defective (an unknown population parameter)
p Sample proportion defective (estimate of p from one sample)
p Sample proportion defective (estimate of p from all samples)
sp Standard deviation of sample proportions
p-chart Example
size Samplesamplein defectives of Number
p
samples of Number * size Samplesamples allin defectives of Number
p
p-chart Example n
ppsp
1
pzspUCL
pzspLCL
Sample Sample Size Number of Defects p 1 100 4 0.04 2 100 2 0.02 3 100 5 0.05 4 100 3 0.03 5 100 6 0.06 6 100 4 0.04 7 100 3 0.03 8 100 7 0.07 9 100 1 0.01 10 100 2 0.02 11 100 3 0.03 12 100 2 0.02 13 100 2 0.02 14 100 8 0.08 15 100 3 0.03
123456789
101112131415161718
A B C D E F G HSample Sample Size Number of Defects p-bar
1 100 4 0.042 100 2 0.023 100 5 0.054 100 3 0.035 100 6 0.066 100 4 0.047 100 3 0.038 100 7 0.079 100 1 0.01
10 100 2 0.0211 100 3 0.0312 100 2 0.0213 100 2 0.0214 100 8 0.0815 100 3 0.03
p-bar-bar 0.0367stdev(p-bar) 0.0188
=AVERAGE(D2:D16)=SQRT(((D17)*(1-D17))/(B16))
Note: If the LCL is negative, we round it up to zero.
123456789
101112131415161718192021
A B C D E F GSample Sample Size Number of Defects p-bar LCL UCL
1 100 4 0.04 0 0.09302 100 2 0.02 0 0.09303 100 5 0.05 0 0.09304 100 3 0.03 0 0.09305 100 6 0.06 0 0.09306 100 4 0.04 0 0.09307 100 3 0.03 0 0.09308 100 7 0.07 0 0.09309 100 1 0.01 0 0.0930
10 100 2 0.02 0 0.093011 100 3 0.03 0 0.093012 100 2 0.02 0 0.093013 100 2 0.02 0 0.093014 100 8 0.08 0 0.093015 100 3 0.03 0 0.0930
p-bar-bar 0.0367stdev(p-bar) 0.0188
UCL 0.0930LCL -0.0197
=D17+3*D18=D17-3*D18
=$D$20
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
0.125
0.150
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Statistical Symbols (Variables)
X A Random Variable
xi One Observation of X
n The Number of Observations of X Mean (A Population Parameter)
X Mean (An Estimate of from Sample Data) Standard Deviation (A Population Parameter)
s Standard Deviation (An Estimate of from Sample Data)
X-bar, R chart Example
For X-bar chart RAXLCL 2 RAXUCL 2
For R chart RDLCL 3 RDUCL 4
Sample Obs 1 Obs 2 Obs 3 Obs 4 Obs 5 1 10.682 10.689 10.776 10.798 10.714 2 10.787 10.860 10.601 10.746 10.779 3 10.780 10.667 10.838 10.785 10.723 4 10.591 10.727 10.812 10.775 10.730 5 10.693 10.708 10.790 10.758 10.671 6 10.749 10.714 10.738 10.719 10.606 7 10.791 10.713 10.689 10.877 10.603 8 10.744 10.779 10.110 10.737 10.750 9 10.769 10.773 10.641 10.644 10.725 10 10.718 10.671 10.708 10.850 10.712 11 10.787 10.821 10.764 10.658 10.708 12 10.622 10.802 10.818 10.872 10.727 13 10.657 10.822 10.893 10.544 10.750 14 10.806 10.749 10.859 10.801 10.701 15 10.660 10.681 10.644 10.747 10.728
From Exhibit TN7.7
n A2 D3 D4 2 1.88 0.00 3.27 3 1.02 0.00 2.57 4 0.73 0.00 2.28 5 0.58 0.00 2.11 6 0.48 0.00 2.00 7 0.42 0.08 1.92 8 0.37 0.14 1.86 9 0.34 0.18 1.82 10 0.31 0.22 1.78 11 0.29 0.26 1.74
1234567891011121314151617
A B C D E F G H I J KSample Obs 1 Obs 2 Obs 3 Obs 4 Obs 5 Avg Range
1 10.682 10.689 10.776 10.798 10.714 10.732 0.1162 10.787 10.860 10.601 10.746 10.779 10.755 0.2593 10.780 10.667 10.838 10.785 10.723 10.759 0.1714 10.591 10.727 10.812 10.775 10.730 10.727 0.2215 10.693 10.708 10.790 10.758 10.671 10.724 0.1196 10.749 10.714 10.738 10.719 10.606 10.705 0.1437 10.791 10.713 10.689 10.877 10.603 10.735 0.2748 10.744 10.779 10.110 10.737 10.750 10.624 0.6699 10.769 10.773 10.641 10.644 10.725 10.710 0.132
10 10.718 10.671 10.708 10.850 10.712 10.732 0.17911 10.787 10.821 10.764 10.658 10.708 10.748 0.16312 10.622 10.802 10.818 10.872 10.727 10.768 0.25013 10.657 10.822 10.893 10.544 10.750 10.733 0.34914 10.806 10.749 10.859 10.801 10.701 10.783 0.15815 10.660 10.681 10.644 10.747 10.728 10.692 0.103
Averages 10.728 0.220
=AVERAGE(B10:F10)
=MAX(B12:F12)-MIN(B12:F12)
=AVERAGE(H2:H16)
123456789
1011121314151617
A B C D E F G H I J K L MSample Obs 1 Obs 2 Obs 3 Obs 4 Obs 5 Avg Range n A2 D3 D4
1 10.682 10.689 10.776 10.798 10.714 10.732 0.116 2 1.88 0.00 3.272 10.787 10.860 10.601 10.746 10.779 10.755 0.259 3 1.02 0.00 2.573 10.780 10.667 10.838 10.785 10.723 10.759 0.171 4 0.73 0.00 2.284 10.591 10.727 10.812 10.775 10.730 10.727 0.221 5 0.58 0.00 2.115 10.693 10.708 10.790 10.758 10.671 10.724 0.119 6 0.48 0.00 2.006 10.749 10.714 10.738 10.719 10.606 10.705 0.143 7 0.42 0.08 1.927 10.791 10.713 10.689 10.877 10.603 10.735 0.274 8 0.37 0.14 1.868 10.744 10.779 10.110 10.737 10.750 10.624 0.669 9 0.34 0.18 1.829 10.769 10.773 10.641 10.644 10.725 10.710 0.132 10 0.31 0.22 1.78
10 10.718 10.671 10.708 10.850 10.712 10.732 0.179 11 0.29 0.26 1.7411 10.787 10.821 10.764 10.658 10.708 10.748 0.16312 10.622 10.802 10.818 10.872 10.727 10.768 0.250 A2 0.5813 10.657 10.822 10.893 10.544 10.750 10.733 0.349 D3 014 10.806 10.749 10.859 10.801 10.701 10.783 0.158 D4 2.1115 10.660 10.681 10.644 10.747 10.728 10.692 0.103 Mean 10.728
Averages 10.728 0.220 Range 0.220
=K5
=G17=H17
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223
A B C D E F G H I J KSample Obs 1 Obs 2 Obs 3 Obs 4 Obs 5 Avg Range
1 10.682 10.689 10.776 10.798 10.714 10.732 0.1162 10.787 10.860 10.601 10.746 10.779 10.755 0.2593 10.780 10.667 10.838 10.785 10.723 10.759 0.1714 10.591 10.727 10.812 10.775 10.730 10.727 0.2215 10.693 10.708 10.790 10.758 10.671 10.724 0.1196 10.749 10.714 10.738 10.719 10.606 10.705 0.1437 10.791 10.713 10.689 10.877 10.603 10.735 0.2748 10.744 10.779 10.110 10.737 10.750 10.624 0.6699 10.769 10.773 10.641 10.644 10.725 10.710 0.13210 10.718 10.671 10.708 10.850 10.712 10.732 0.17911 10.787 10.821 10.764 10.658 10.708 10.748 0.16312 10.622 10.802 10.818 10.872 10.727 10.768 0.250 A2 0.5813 10.657 10.822 10.893 10.544 10.750 10.733 0.349 D3 014 10.806 10.749 10.859 10.801 10.701 10.783 0.158 D4 2.1115 10.660 10.681 10.644 10.747 10.728 10.692 0.103 Mean 10.728
Averages 10.728 0.220 Range 0.220
X-Bar UCL 10.85625LCL 10.60058
R-Bar UCL 0.465044LCL 0
=K16+K13*K17=K16-K13*K17
=K15*K17=K14*K17
X-bar Chart
10.45
10.50
10.55
10.60
10.65
10.70
10.75
10.80
10.85
10.90
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
R chart
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Interpretation• Does any point fall outside the control
limits?• Are there seven points in a row all on
one side of the center line?• Is there a run of seven points in a row
going up, or a run of seven points in a row going down?
• Are there cycles or other non-random patterns?
A Process in which the Specification Limits are Six Standard Deviations above and below the Process MeanTwo Approaches:• Move the Specification Limits Farther Apart• Reduce the Standard Deviation
Six Sigma Defined (Low-Level)
Approach #1
Ask the Customer to Move the Specification Limits Farther Apart.
2-sigma ProcessCp = 0.667Cpk = 0.66745,500 ppm
Spec Limits
3-sigma ProcessCp = 1.0Cpk = 1.02,700 ppm
Spec Limits
4-sigma ProcessCp = 1.333Cpk = 1.333
63 ppm
Spec Limits
5-sigma ProcessCp = 1.667Cpk = 1.667
0.57 ppm
Spec Limits
6-sigma ProcessCp = 2.0Cpk = 2.00.002 ppm
Spec Limits
Approach #2
Reduce the Standard Deviation.
2-sigma ProcessCp = 0.667Cpk = 0.66745,500 ppm
Spec Limits
3-sigma ProcessCp = 1.0Cpk = 1.02,700 ppm
Spec Limits
4-sigma ProcessCp = 1.333Cpk = 1.333
63 ppm
Spec Limits
5-sigma ProcessCp = 1.667Cpk = 1.667
0.57 ppm
Spec Limits
6-sigma ProcessCp = 2.0Cpk = 2.00.002 ppm
Spec Limits
Process DriftWhat Happens when the Process Mean Is Not Centered between the Specification Limits?
3-sigma Process(centered)Cp = 1.0Cpk = 1.02,700 ppm
Spec Limits
3-sigma Process(shifted 0.5 std. dev.)
Cp = 1.0Cpk = 0.833ppm = 6,442
(about 2.72-sigma)
Spec Limits
3-sigma Process(shifted 1.0 std. dev.)
Cp = 1.0Cpk = 0.667
ppm = 22,782(about 2.28-sigma)
Spec Limits
3-sigma Process(shifted 1.5 std. dev.)
Cp = 1.0Cpk = 0.5
ppm = 66,811(about 1.83-sigma)
Spec Limits
Six Sigma: Many Meanings• A Symbol • A Measure • A Benchmark or Goal• A Philosophy• A Method
Six Sigma: A Symbol
• is a Statistical Symbol for Standard Deviation
• Standard Deviation is a Measure of Dispersion, Volatility, or Variability
Six Sigma: A Measure• The “Sigma Level” of a
process can be used to express its capability — how well it performs with respect to customer requirements.
• Percent Defects, Cp, Cpk, PPM
Six Sigma: A Benchmark or Goal
• The specific value of 6 Sigma (as opposed to 5 or 4 Sigma) is a benchmark for process excellence.
• Adopted by leading organizations as a goal for process capability.
Six Sigma: A Philosophy• A vision of process performance• Tantamount to “zero defects”• A “Management Mantra”
Six Sigma: A Method
• Really a Collection of Methods:– Product/Service Design– Quality Control– Quality Improvement– Strategic Planning
Where Does “3.4 PPM” Come From?
• Six Sigma is commonly defined to be equivalent to 3.4 defective parts per million.
• Juran says that a Six Sigma process will produce only 0.002 defective parts per million.
• What gives?
Normal Curve Probabilities ±1 Sigma 68.3% of Data ±2 Sigmas 95.4% ±3 Sigmas 99.73% ±4 Sigmas 99.994% ±5 Sigmas 99.99994% ±6 Sigmas 99.9999998%
12345678
A B CArea under the curve z > 6
0.00000000099
Total area outside of 6 sigma limits0.00000000198
Parts per Million0.00198
=1-NORMSDIST(6)
=2*A2
=A5*1000000
Process Centered between Spec LimitsSigma Level Cp Cpk PPM
1 0.333 0.333 317,3102 0.667 0.667 45,5003 1.000 1.000 2,7004 1.333 1.333 63.45 1.667 1.667 0.576 2.000 2.000 0.002
Process Shifted by 1.5 Standard DeviationsSigma Level Cp Cpk PPM
1 0.333 -0.167 697,6722 0.667 0.167 308,7703 1.000 0.500 66,8104 1.333 0.833 6,2105 1.667 1.167 232.76 2.000 1.500 3.4
Where Does “3.4 PPM” Come From?
• The 3.4 defective parts per million definition of Six Sigma includes a “worst case” scenario of a 1.5 standard deviation shift in the process.
• It is assumed that there is a very high probability that such a shift would be detected by SPC methods (low probability of Type II error).
Six Sigma in Context• Is Six Sigma dramatically different
from old-fashioned quality control?• Is Six Sigma a departure from
1980’s-style TQM?
Six Sigma in Context• What Is New?
– Focus on Quantitative Methods– Focus On Control– A Higher Standard– A New Metric for Defects (PPM)– Lots of training– Linkage between quality goals and
employee incentives?
Using Six Sigma• A New Standard; Not Adopted
Uniformly across Industries• Beyond Generalities, Need to
Develop Organization-Specific Methods
• Hard Work, Not Magic• “A Direction Not a Place”
Summary• Quality and Six Sigma: Basic ideas and history• Juran Trilogy
– Control– Improvement– Planning
• Quality Strategy• Focus on Statistical Methods
– Process Capability ideas and metrics– Control charts for attributes and variables
Recommended