SILS Complications Dan Geisler, MD, FACS, FASCRS

SILS Complications

Dan Geisler, MD, FACS, FASCRS

2

Disclosures

Covidien Consultant

3

4

5

6

7

V A R I A B L E S

8

V A R I A B L E S

TROCARS

SURGEONS STEPS

SEQUENCE

INSTRUMENTS

POSITIONING

9

Challenges of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Multiple QuadrantsMultiple VesselsSmall Bowel PositioningBowel TransectionBowel Anastomosis

10

Challenges of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Time ConsumingTechnically ChallengingTechnical AbilityAdvanced TechnologyCapable Assistants

11

Strategy to Combat Time Constraints of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

break operation into directly productive vs. nonproductive actions

standardizestandardize approach to improve efficiency retraction performed by gravitygravitykeep repositioning to a minimum

3 Trocar Technique

12

SILS Colectomy

Advantages• simplified method• need only a camera operator• safe and efficient• reproducible

13

“Problems” with M.I.S.

14

“Problems” with M.I.S.

Problems with SILS

15

Laparoscopic CRSImproved cosmesis

Decreased pain

Decreased recovery

16

“Problems” with M.I.S.

Decreased ability to complain of pain

• Improvement in maximum pain score

on POD1 & POD2 (p<0.05)

• Shorter LOS

Papaconstantinou & Thomas

SILS

17

“Problems” with M.I.S.Decreased ability to complain of pain

Inability to “show off” a big scar

SILS

18

“Problems” with M.I.S.Decreased ability to complain of pain

Inability to “show off” a big scar

SILS

19

“Problems” with M.I.S.Decreased ability to complain of pain

Inability to “show off” a big scar

Having to return to work earlier

20

21

Laparoscopic Colectomy Less blood loss Quicker recovery to normal function Better margins of resection Better visualization

• Mesorectal excision• Decrease incidence of autonomic nerve injury• More precise surgical procedure

Less wound related problems• Infection • Dehiscence • Incisional hernia

Minimally invasive procedure

Advantages

22

SILS Colorectal

Surgery

23

SILS Colectomy N = 99 Age = 9 – 93 30 with previous abdominal operations BMI = 26 (15 – 39)

24

SILS Colectomy N = 99

Diagnosis UC: 46 Neoplasia: 17 Crohn’s: 10 Diverticulitis: 10 FAP: 2 Other: 14

25

SILS ColectomyN = 99 OR Time: 105 minutes (13 – 245) Incision Length: 3.7 cm (1.2 – 7.8)

LN Harvest*: 44

26

SILS ColectomyN = 99

Ports 87 SILS 12 Additional Ports

• 1: 9

• 2: 1

• 3: 2

27

Complications?

Wound Complications Infections

• Similar

• Easy to deal with

Hernias? • Too early to tell

• Access technique?

28

HerniaVariable rates of occurrenceDependent on locationAvoidable?Tissue necrosis?

29

HerniaVariable rates of occurrenceDependent on locationAvoidable?Tissue necrosis?

WE DON’T KNOW!!!!!

30

Difficulties?

5 mm endoeye SKILLED camera operator Camera, then instruments

• Not both at the same time

Splenic flexure

31

Difficulties?

Port SILS (Covidien)

• Atraumatic

• Simplistic

• Easy to use

Triport, Ethicon, Gelpoint

32

SILS Colorectal Benefits over conventional laparoscopy

Drawbacks over conventional laparoscopy

Incidence of hernia formation?

33

SummarySingle port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery Minimize abdominal trauma May utilize a natural body orifice or scar such as the

Umbilicus Potential decrease in morbidity Certainly superior cosmesis

“NOTES” Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery”……..experimental

SPL seems to be a practical clinical step towards NOTES

34

SummarySingle port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery Minimize abdominal trauma May utilize a natural orifice or scar such as the Umbilicus Potential decrease in morbidity Certainly superior cosmesis

“NOTES” Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery”……..experimental

SPL seems to be a practical clinical step towards NOTES

A BRIDGE TO THE FUTURE!!!