View
216
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
SCHEDULE OF SUBMISSIONS – P216235 PROPOSED HOTEL ON LOT 55 TOWNVIEW TERRACE, MARGARET RIVER
SUB-
MISSION NO.
SUBMITTER
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS
1 Owners of adjoining
property The current boundary fence is adequate for our property. If the developers want to replace the
existing fence we are happy for them to do so if they pay in full for the new fence.
2 Nearby land owner The streetscape will not be preserved with the height above the guidelines.
East elevation not harmonised with build environment.
Traffic in Ned Higgins Lane will be affected dramatically and will have impacts at school times and
on pedestrians.
Would however not support access from Townview Terrace.
Density of hotel too large. 32 rooms on small area is not consistent with the Margaret River Style or
region brand.
3 Nearby land owner Density is excessively high compared to neighbouring norms.
Extra vehicle movements associated with 32 car bays in Ned Higgins Lane will create congestion and
potentially increase no of accidents. This is especially of concern to pedestrians at both street
crossings of Ned Higgins Lane, particularly for users at the primary school end.
Height of the development is excessive and does not conform to the code and will result in
inappropriate dominance of the area, which still contains a mix of residential dwellings.
watercorporation.com.au Development 629 Newcastle Street Services Leederville WA 6007
PO Box 100 T (08) 9420 2099 Leederville WA 6902 F (08) 9420 3193
Your Ref: P216235,PTY/2677 Our Ref: JT1 2010 09374 vo l - DEV343732 Enquiries: Charles Sabato Direct Tel: 9420 2105 Fax: 9420 3193
19 May 2016
Chief Executive Officer Shire Of Augusta-Margaret River PO Box 61 MARGARET RIVER WA 6285
6 WATER
co k P 0 12 A T 1 0 N
IRECEIVED ;15 MAY 2016
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA-MARGARET RIVER
Attention of: Johan Pienaar
Re: Lot 55 Town View Terrace, Margaret River — Proposed Hotel
Thank you for your letter dated May 10, 2016. The Water Corporation offers the following comments in regard to this proposal.
Water and Wastewater Reticulated water and sewerage is currently available to the subject land.
General Comments It should be noted that existing sewerage mains are located in close proximity to the subject land near the northern side boundary (plan attached). Due consideration will be required when developing in this area. The developer is required to fund the full cost of protecting or modifying any of the existing infrastructure which may be affected by the proposed development.
This proposal will require approval by our Building Services section prior to commencement of works. Infrastructure contributions and fees may be required to be paid prior to approval being issued. If the application is retrospective, approval by our Building Services section is still required.
The principle followed by the Water Corporation for the funding of subdivision or development is one of user pays. The developer is expected to provide all water and sewerage reticulation if required. A contribution for Water, Sewerage and Drainage headworks may also be required. In addition the developer may be required to fund new works or the upgrading of existing works and protection of all works. Any temporary works needed are required to be fully funded by the developer. The Water Corporation may also require land being ceded free of cost for works.
Should you have any queries or require further clarification on any of the above issues, please do not hesitate to contact the Enquiries Officer.
Charles Sabato Development Planner Development Services
ABN 28 003 434 917
32
203
66999
silos 10Gh4D
0773 0040
220
"-624173S
1-139 ,f
0142 1 8,24 •120W 2591 s 46E
'200FN 1 ?VS
WAPC 130488
403CV.3,1
s9 9
660
C Z 3
4 OFE 1 OEN 177 n
203 rt VS 159203
S 106815
002C ' 3 C M 1 '3 32
694
H*4
H-146
11248
'2:7
1131 8 /-322 CE) I
40/497 205
s 4.; 150AC I b'S' CSON CR P IC 266. ..0 14
ii • _ 1 De' I "N.,
ro '.4 i h e Watts Corptsabon hes takes due tare at tbs. pretsaestton el data :unarmed on tilts map bate accepts no reaponstbaity P e w s inssasacs
f fstatlyt :scissors' or other Strassaboa 6,424ed 70, ' tssas s p a c e 42. 41300 Pas itstrrnattos• The uses ts rearanded that u n d o no cassartstances , C caa the Sttannatter W a s * , chstAsted be coped, altered. !mi l l ed or othensse pubtabect in any farm sciuslIng the Internet rathatt &assess
permission of the Water Cotperaten. Prior as c a s I n g otz any stessitat sthsthess st proassay to l a d s . 0 displayed on tha mac the WW.er 61 .—. : Cat caration Plead be ...aft...4d s a 13 13 96. k t s Csacctracits, fousr3 oath sttormatson contasea on t h e mop Assad be aThased ttc rl i R u s t SecisvmSon an (08)9420 2069 c r Emma asse t s% suaNceRtwatemotporaticnsonat: RI i
6241275
2421
"a
CCr‘i ,1 '2075
120
.4
00Re st_ "4090
0008 '1•OFW 1 OEN
1201 '3200
S163703 H333
VS 127208 ;2c H28
2947
H149
2 00AC 51
COCO OFE
' 1 GEN
.416.60 9010
•20730 ' 7 PRN
•'2' 3 217
;10,4e 2(3.0
921
00 H76 NAIAlfia 52725
H78
F O R R FRTY
07290 0275
OFN 959W
3048 153
0 ' T 2 0 0 R
V
ENLARC3EME
91 (1733 10704
1 50AC
11244.fc • , •••., 4612
45
2E4
/138 ,fiLD0
H40
H42
F4
Vs 115904
HF2
/>
5i^6 0012 4079
0FW
Sreenif29/09.02 MARGARET RIVER Date Printed: 19/05/16 13:23:12 Coordinate System: MGA94 Zone 50 Height Datum: AHD
Rebecca Kevill
From: amrsc Sent: Monday, 16 May 2016 8:46 AM To: Rebecca Kevill Subject: FW: Proposed Hotel Attachments: Proposed Hotel.pdf; WE_n4436869
_REQUEST_FOR_QUOTATION_AND_GRANT_OF_LICENCE_FOR_DIGITAL_DATA_....pdf
From: Customer Service Centre SSR [mailto:customer.service.centre.ssr@westernpower.com.au] Sent: Sunday, 15 May 2016 4:24 PM To: amrsc Subject: FW: Proposed Hotel
Dear Johan Pienaar
Thank you for contacting us about your proposed work.
As your proposed work is near energised electrical installations and powerlines, the person in control of the work site must ensure that no person, plant or material enters the "Danger Zone" of an overhead powerline or other electrical network assets.
The "Danger Zone" is set out in Western Australian Occupational Safety and Health Regulation 1996 — Specifically Reg 3.64. (Link)
Any information provided to you by Western Power should not be used in isolation and we recommend that you refer to the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations 1996. These documents outline WorkSafe WA requirements for working near electricity.
For queries relating to these requirements, visit WorkSafe or contact WorkSafe on 1300 307 877.
To help you plan your works around Western Power's infrastructure, please follow the links below:
Working Near Electricity
Dial Before You Dig
If you require information about Western Power's infrastructure including plans, please complete a request for Digital Data attached.
If you require Western Power to complete work on your behalf, please complete the appropriate application form using the link below:
Customer applications
Should your project involve any changes to existing ground levels around poles and structures, or you will be working underneath power lines or around underground cables, please contact Western Power on 13 10 87.
We are obliged to point out that any change to Western Power's network is the responsibility of the individual developer.
Kind regards
1
Customer Service Officer Customer Service Western Power — 363 Wellington Street Perth WA 6000 T: 13 13 51 Faults/Emergencies and 13 10 87 General Enquiries I F: (08) 9225 2660 E: enquirv@westernpowercom.au W: westernpower.com.au
awesternpower ft
Electricity Networks Corporation, trading as Western Power ABN: 18 540 492 861
TO THE ADDRESSEE - this email is for the intended addressee only and may contain information that is confidential. I f you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email or by telephone. Please also destroy this message and any electronic or hard copies o f this message.
Any claim to confidentiality is not waived or lost by reason o f mistaken transmission o f this email.
Unencrypted email is not secure and may not be authentic. Western Power cannot guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness or confidentiality o f this email and any attachments.
VIRUSES - Western Power scans all outgoing entails and attachments for viruses, however it is the recipient's responsibility to ensure this email is free o f viruses.
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
2
A.B.N. 66159398428
B.R.N. 14041
PH (08) 9226 3236
WEB www.dcpm.com.au
ADD 995 Hay Street
Perth, WA 6000
5th May 2016
Johan Pienaar
Shire of Augusta-Margaret River
Planning and Development Services
PO BOX 61
Margaret River WA 6285
RE: Additional Information- Lot 55, 62 Town View Terrace Margaret River WA 6285
Dear Mr Pienaar,
Thank-you for you prompt feedback on our recently submitted Development Approval Application at the above address. With
regards to you request for additional information, I have itemised your queries and responded to each in turn below.
1. Development Standards – Schedule 13 of Local Planning Scheme No.1 (LPS1)
Schedule 13 of LPS1 sets development standards for various zones under the Scheme. The application
report states that the proposed development adheres to the schedule 13 standards. No detail is provided
to support this statement, especially in relation to the plot ratio standard, which is 1. The proposed 3
storey development has an internal floor area of 1443m², as indicated on drawing SK-200. This would
suggest that the plot ratio standard of 1 (on a 1012m² lot) is exceeded. Detailed calculations are
required to demonstrate compliance with the plot ratio standard. It must be indicated which floor areas
are excluded in the plot ration calculation.
We assume that the definition for plot ratio and plot ration area in the Residential Design Codes should be used. This
definition typically applies to dwellings, and as this is a commercial motel, we assumed that it was not a requirement. If
this was wrongly interpreted, we apologise for the confusion. We have supplied a summary of plot ratio below and you
will see that it generally adheres to the requirement (in fact, it is 1% over)
Plot Ratio Areas
Lower Ground Level 0m². Area used solely for access, parking and bin stores
Upper Ground Level 381.43m²
Level 1 381.43m²
Level 2 261.59m²
Total Plot Ratio 1024.45m² (101.23% of 1012m² site area)
2. Height Variation
Please provide a detailed assessment of the potential impact of the building exceeding the 10m height
standard. Note that each development proposal is assessed on its own merits and any height variation
is required to be justified under the provisions of clause 5.13.3 of LPS1.
Clause 5.13.3 of LPS1 allows for the local government to permit the construction of buildings or structures in
certain circumstances. We would like to refer to section a) where “site constraints are such as to prevent the
construction of a reasonable building on the site without exceeding the relevant limit”
As indicated on our sections and elevations, the site falls one full storey (approx. 3m) from front to back. We
believe that the intent of the 10m height limit is to allow the construction of 3 storey buildings. In order to
A.B.N. 66159398428
B.R.N. 14041
PH (08) 9226 3236
WEB www.dcpm.com.au
ADD 995 Hay Street
Perth, WA 6000
comply with this requirement, we have designed the building in a way that it steps down to follow the natural
ground level and appears to be less than 10m in height from either end.
Due to the difficulty created by the sloping site, there are areas where the building exceeds the height limit in the
areas where it steps. This is simply due to the fact that there are minimum ceiling requirements for the proposed
building to be habitable. If we were to design the building in a way that it did not exceed the height limit at any
point, we would need to restrict the whole building to 2 stories. We believe this puts an unreasonable constraint
on the building and is not really in keeping with the intent of the TPS height limits and intended density for the
area. This constraint would simply be a result of the difficult site which clearly prevents the construction of a
reasonable building as per 5.13.3(a)
3. Impacts on adjoining dwelling
The building on the adjoining lot to the south (64 Townview Terrace) is a single dwelling. The application is silent
on potential impacts such as solar access, adequate daylight, privacy and potential noise impacts from air
conditioning units. The Shire’s Environmental Health Department expressed specific concerns in relation to the
potential noise impacts and requested information on appropriate mitigating measures.
The provisions for impacts on the adjoining dwelling appear to have been extracted from the residential design
codes. To satisfy the council’s enquiry, we have addressed these provisions separately below based on the
requirements of the R-Codes. We have also created an accompanying drawing for the purposes of calculating and
demonstrating the below items
Solar Access, adequate daylight – As per the Residential Design Codes section 5.4.2, we have measured the shading to
the adjoining lot at 21 June, 12pm and it equals 55.8%. The R-Codes set out minimum areas relating to Residential
Zonings, as this has no residential zoning, we are unable to calculate whether this is compliant. We would like to note
that the areas where the shadow falls are mainly on the roof of the dwelling or on heavily vegetated and inaccessible
areas of their yard. The outdoor living areas of the adjoining property appear to be more on the south side of the block.
Privacy – The design of the proposed building has considered visual privacy very carefully, as such, there is not a single
habitable space that views directly onto the adjacent residential property, except for 3 windows, all of which are more
than 1650mm above floor level.
Noise – The acoustic impact of the development has also been considered very carefully. As such, there are no balconies
facing directly onto the adjacent property. Additionally, all of the air conditioning units are being located on the second
floor roof, at the western end of the property. This means that there are no air-conditioning units near the single
residential property, as they have been moved so they are adjacent to the vacant/ carparking lots which are directly
adjacent to that end of the boundary. Additionally, all of the plant will be 2 stories up which will assist in the separation,
and they are all located behind a 1m high concrete parapet wall which will significantly add to the acoustic mitigation of
these units. As they are only intended to be residential split system units (not commercial plant) they are already
designed to be well below the requirements for residential use and likely in the 42db operating range.
A.B.N. 66159398428
B.R.N. 14041
PH (08) 9226 3236
WEB www.dcpm.com.au
ADD 995 Hay Street
Perth, WA 6000
4. Waste Management
The bin store is not considered to be suitable for the access of a rubbish truck and may result in the bins encroaching
into the 5m wide pavement of Ned Higgins Lane on pick up days. Further information is required on how this aspect
of the design will be addressed to function within in the property boundaries. Consideration should be given to using
240 litre wheelie bins and the identifying of a suitable set-out area which will not result in an obstruction of vehicle
movements on Ned Higgins Lane.
After discussing the proposal with Kim Nolan from the Shire on 05/05/16, it was agreed that the hotel service staff
will more than likely be taking the waste across the lane to the skip bin which services the main hotel. To allow for
future redundancy in this proposal, we have proposed storage for 10 x 240L bins. Kim agreed that this would be
more than enough to service the hotel rooms should it be required.
See below sketch for the proposed revised design. Please let us know if updated drawings are required.
A.B.N. 66159398428
B.R.N. 14041
PH (08) 9226 3236
WEB www.dcpm.com.au
ADD 995 Hay Street
Perth, WA 6000
5. Extension of Time
It is further requested that you provide your agreement to extending the time for the Shire to consider the application in
accordance with Regulation 12(4) of the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Amendment
Regulations 2011 (as amended). Your prompt attention to this matter would be appreciated
While we understand an extension of time may be granted under Regulation 12(4) of the DAP regulations 2011, we do
not understand why we would be required to agree to an extension of time. As per Regulation 12(4A) the time between
the shire providing notice under Regulation 11A (in this case a request for extra information) and the applicant
responding is excluded from the 50/80 days the shire has to submit the report to DAP (in other words ‘stop the clock’),
so the Shire’s request for additional information does not automatically require us to provide consent to an extension
of time.
We are happy to discuss this in further detail as it is an unusual process and one which we are as keen to see run
smoothly as I am sure the Shire is.
We hope that this additional information satisfies your queries and we look forward to hearing from you soon. If you have any
further queries regarding the design, please do not to hesitate to contact us.
Regards,
Clancy White
Director – DCPM
A 995 Hay St, Perth 6000 P 08 9226 3236
F 08 9322 1248
M 0438 380 970
W www.dcpm.com.au
Recommended