San Joaquin Valley Agriculture: Irrigation Methods ... · o Irrigation Methods o Flood Irrigation o...

Preview:

Citation preview

San Joaquin Valley

Agriculture: Irrigation

Methods, Technology, and

Efficiencies

Masters of Science in Agronomy – Creative Component

June 30th, 2015

Nick Flies

Presentation Outline

• Personal Background

• Family

• Rationale

• Project Introduction

• Conclusion

• Resources

• References

• Acknowledgements

Personal Background• Agricultural Passion

o Family Farms: Northwest & Southwest Iowa

o Ranches: Western Minnesota, Eastern Nebraska, and Central Colorado

Personal Background• Under Graduate Degree

o 2005: Iowa State University –

Agricultural Systems Technology

Personal Background• Employment

o 2005 - 2010: John Deere Ag

Management Solutions

• Product & Customer Support -

GPS Technology (Urbandale, IA)

o 2010 – Present: John Deere Ag & Turf

Division

• Territory Customer Support

Manager (Visalia, CA)

Family

Family

Family

Rationale• Desired Program

Applicationo Couple Agriculture Equipment and

Agronomic Sciences to more

capably support Producers

Rationale• Master of Science in Agronomy

Opportunitieso Available Irrigation Curriculum

• Agronomy 502 – Chemistry, Physics, and Biology of Soils

o Content Relating to Irrigation History, Soil Water Potential

• Agronomy 532 – Soil Management

o Content Relating to Soil-Water Management Strategies

• Climatic Trendso Conditions of Drought

• Agricultural Demandso Wise Resource Utilization

• Global Population over 9 Billion in 2050

• Creative Component Selectiono Educational Project

• Desired Outcomeo More informed, agricultural-diverse John Deere

Employees

www.summitpost.org www.jpl.nasa.org

Project Introduction

• Educational Project: A Lesson on Irrigation

o Introduction:

• San Joaquin Valley of California – Agricultural Significance and Crop Diversity

o Irrigation Methods

o Flood Irrigation

o Sprinkler Irrigation

o Micro or Drip Irrigation

• Definition, Water Flow Structure, Crops, Land Formation/Preparation, Equipment, and Pros & Cons

o Soil Moisture Monitoring

o Conclusion

o Resources

o References

Introduction

• 2013 Agricultural Cash Receipts –Total Valueo California: $46.4B

o Iowa: $31.2B

o Nebraska: $23.6B

o Minnesota: $22.3B

o Texas: $21.6B

• Commodity Leadero Almonds, artichokes, apricots, asparagus,

broccoli, cabbage, carrots, cauliflower, celery, dates, figs, garlic, grapes, kiwi, lemons, lettuce, melons, nectarines, olives, onions, peaches, peppers, pistachios, plums, raspberries, spinach, squash, strawberries, tangerines, tomatoes, and walnuts

• Average Annual Rainfallo Iowa: 35 inches

o California: 7.5 inches

www.nass.usda.gov

Flood Irrigation

• Definition o Uniform width, length, and gradual slope

o Water is released at the upper end of the field

o Flows across and infiltrates the soil by means of gravitational force

Figure 1. Field layout of surface irrigation illustrating water flow (Michael, 2008, p.

555)

Flood Irrigation

Flood Irrigation

• Water Flow Structureo “Open-Field” vs. “Closed-Field”

ditches

o Check width, length, and cross-

slope

o Distribution components

Flood Irrigation

• Water Flow Structure: Above Ground, Below Ground,

Earthen Ditch

Flood Irrigation - Border

• Water Delivery: Valves and Side wall breaks

Flood Irrigation - Furrow

• Water Delivery: Plastic or Aluminum Siphon Tubes

Flood Irrigation - Border

• Crops: Legumes, Cereal Crops, Nuts, etc.

Flood Irrigation - Furrow

• Crops: Cotton, Corn, Roses, etc.

Flood Irrigation

• Land Formation and Preparation

Flood Irrigation

• Equipmento Grading and Leveling

o Border Tools

• Construction/Destruction

o Ditch Tools

o Furrow Tools

Flood Irrigation

• Fertigation – Liquid

Flood Irrigation

• Pros o Straightforward Irrigation Method – Utilization of Pipe and Ditches

o Temporary and Configurable

o Economical Equipment

• Conso Costly

• Precise Field-Surface Characteristics

o Skilled and Knowledgeable Labor

Sprinkler Irrigation

• Definition o A series of pipes: mains, laterals, and risers

o Rotating head and perforated systems

o Pressure influences the volume and range of water applied

Figure 2. System layout of sprinkler irrigation illustrating water flow and hardware.

(Michael, 2008, p. 582)

Sprinkler Irrigation

Sprinkler Irrigation

• Water Flow Structureo Filtration

o Mobility of distribution components

o Accessory equipment

Sprinkler Irrigation

• Cropso Center Pivot Irrigation – Alfalfa

o Ground Pipe Irrigation – Onions, garlic, melons, lettuce, spinach, cabbage, etc.

Sprinkler Irrigation

• Land Formation and Preparationo Negligible

• Equipmento Tractor, trailers, etc.

Sprinkler Irrigation

• Pros o Field flexibility

o Equipment mobility

o Broad range of crops

o Application rates

• Conso Equipment mobility

o Reliable Labor

o Equipment investment

Micro or Drip Irrigation

• Definition o Emitters: micro-sprinkler and drip tape

o Efficiency through precision (e.g. volume and location)

Figure 3. System layout of drip irrigation illustrating water flow and hardware.

(Michael, 2008, p. 641)

Micro or Drip Irrigation

Micro or Drip Irrigation

• Water Flow Structureo Filtration

• Primary and secondary

o Accessory components

Micro or Drip Irrigation

• Water Flow Structure: Emitters

Micro or Drip Irrigation

• Crops: High-value and Specialty

Micro or Drip Irrigation

• Crops: Permanent

Micro or Drip Irrigation

• Crops: Cotton, Tomatoes, etc.

Micro or Drip Irrigation• Land Formation

and Preparationo Negligible

• Equipmento Installation and

Removal

o Bed Preparation

Micro or Drip Irrigation

• Pros o Yield increase

o Reduction in water

o Wide range of crops

• Conso Costly

• Precise Field-Surface Characteristics

o Maintenance

o Soil alkalinity

Soil Moisture Monitoring

• Technologyo Neutron sensors

o Travel time sensors

o Capacitance sensors

• Irrigation Schedulingo Soil-moisture levels and

warning

www.deerequipment.com/fieldconnect

Soil Moisture Monitoring

Figure 6. Target moisture regions are created off of producer soil characteristics. (PureSense®, 2012)

Soil Moisture Monitoring

(Hornung Brothers Farming, 2015)

Soil Moisture Monitoring

(Hornung Brothers Farming, 2015)

Conclusion

• Irrigation Trendso Surface irrigation: 43% of Crops

• 20% decline since 1991

o Micro or Drip Irrigation: 38% of Crops

• 15% in 1991

• Population Trendso 25% increase over next 45 years – California Department of Finance

• Environmental Stewardship and Production

Resources

• Cadillac Dessert: The American West and Its

Disappearing Water. By Marc Reisner.

• King of California: J.G. Boswell and the Making of a

Secret American Empire. By Mark Arax and Rick

Wartzman.

• Cattle King: The Biography of Henry Miller, Founder of

the Miller & Lux Cattle Empire. By Edward T. Treadwill

References

• Travels throughout the San Joaquin Valley and the

Central Coast

Acknowledgements

• Major Professoro Dr. Mary Wiedenhoeft

• Iowa State University Faculty & Staffo Dr. Ken Moore

o Dr. Tom Loynachan

o Dawn Miller

• Growerso Matthew & Seth Rossow

o Craig Hornung

o Mark Lawrence

• Familyo Abby, Adelyn, Mason, and Clara

Recommended