Results from the Second North Carolina Wine Industry...

Results from the Second North Carolina

Wine Industry Tracker Survey - 2010

Dr. Michael R. Evans

Professor of Hospitality and Tourism

Management

and

Dr. James E. Stoddard

Professor of Marketing

John. A. Walker College of Business

Appalachian State University

Boone, NC 28608

July 2011

1Evans & Stoddard

Research Sponsorship

• Research assistance by:• The North Carolina Wine & Grape Council

4324 Mail Service Center

Raleigh, NC 27699-4324

• The North Carolina Winegrowers Association

P.O. Box 2495

Yadkinville, NC 27055

• From a grant provided by:• The U.S. Small Business Administration

• Grant managed by:• Appalachian State University Enology & Viticulture Center

9/1/2011 2Evans & Stoddard

Purpose of the Research

To employ the industry tracker tool developed in 2010

to assess the financial performance of the North

Carolina wine industry and compare 2010 performance

data with the baseline study from 2009 where

appropriate.

9/1/2011 3Evans & Stoddard

Research Procedure

• The survey was developed in conjunction with the

North Carolina Wine and Grape Council and the

North Carolina Winegrowers Association.

• The survey was e-mailed to all 106 wineries in North

Carolina identified by the North Carolina Wine &

Grape Council in 2011.

• This was followed by two successive requests for

wineries to complete the survey online. This

procedure resulted in a 31% response rate (N = 33).

9/1/2011 4Evans & Stoddard

Winery, Vineyard or Both (N = 33)

9% of respondents were

wineries, 9% vineyards

and 82% were both.

Percentage of Respondents from North Carolina Wine

Producing Regions: All Reporting Wineries

(N = 33)

9/1/2011 Evans & Stoddard 6

Map courtesy of the North Carolina Winegrowers Association

(http://www.ncwinegrowers.com/generalinfo/vineyards-a-wineries)

12.1%6.1%

39.4%

27.3%12.1%

3%

North Carolina Winery Operations: 2010

Winery operation measures included:

• Winery Sales

• Months Winery Was Open

• Winery Customer Relationship Strategies

• Winery Varietals

• Winery Capacity & Capacity Utilization

• Average Wine Bottle Prices

• Winery Distribution Strategies

• Winery Visitors & Tourists

• Winery Employees

9/1/2011 7Evans & Stoddard

Winery Sample Statistics

• Although 33 wineries responded to the

questionnaire, not all wineries completed all

questions. Therefore, the sample size varies.

• Where appropriate, comparisons are made

between data collected in 2010 (that is, winery

performance in 2009) and data collected in

2011 (winery performance in 2010).

9/1/2011 8Evans & Stoddard

Average Number of Cases Sold in 2010

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

23 40 10,000 2,368.04 2,827.48

9/1/2011 9Evans & Stoddard

Please tell us the number of cases of wine your winery sold.

Sub Sample of Wineries 2009

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

32 100 11,000 2,067.39 2,353.53

Please tell us the number of months your winery or vineyard was

open to the public in 2010.

Please tell us whether your winery has any of the following in 2010:

Winery Capacity 2010

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

25 400 50,000 7,144 10,533

Please tell us the capacity of your winery in terms of the

number of cases of wine your winery can produce in one

year.

Sub Sample of Wineries 2009

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

32 100 11,000 2,067.39 2,353.53

2010 Winery Capacity Utilization

(Mean Cases Sold/Mean Winery Capacity)

2010 Sample of Wineries

N % Utilization

23 33.15%

Sub Sample Wineries 2009

N % Utilization

32 45.89%

Please tell us the average price for a bottle of your wine.

2009 Average Bottle Price

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

40 $8.00 $17.00 $12.99 $2.40

2010 Average Bottle Price

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

26 $9.00 $18.00 $13.83 $2.42

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

40 50% 100% 86.7% 12.5%

9/1/2011 15Evans & Stoddard

Please estimate the percentage of your winery sales that comes

from wine alone.

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

26 50% 100% 85.5% 11.85%

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

38 14% 100% 79.08% 22.11%

9/1/2011 16Evans & Stoddard

Please estimate the percentage of your total wine sales sold on site

at the winery or sold directly to consumers.

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

26 50% 100% 85.5% 11.85%

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

40 0% 86% 6.19% 16.25%

9/1/2011 17Evans & Stoddard

Please estimate the percentage of your wine sales sold to wholesale

distributors.

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

20 0% 49% 9.55% 15.55%

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

39 0% 50% 10.94% 13.26%

9/1/2011 18Evans & Stoddard

Please estimate the percentage of your total wine sales sold direct to

retailers, restaurants, and hotels.

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

19 0% 48% 7.37% 12.29%

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

35 300 90,000 8,844.57 17,383.17

9/1/2011 19Evans & Stoddard

Please estimate the number of yearly visits to your winery or vineyard.

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

27 100 76,000 9,110.56 15,500.68

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

38 20% 95% 61.08% 26.28%

9/1/2011 20Evans & Stoddard

Please tell us the percentage of your visitors that are tourists (i.e., come

from at least 50 miles from home).

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

27 10% 90% 61.56% 24.95%

2009 Wineries

Type N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

Full

Time40 0 51 3.6 8.58

Part

Time37 0 30 5.4 7.54

9/1/2011 21Evans & Stoddard

Please tell us the number of full-time and part-time employees that you have.

2010 Wineries

Type N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

Full

Time25 0 15 4.16 4.45

Part

Time27 0 25 6.93 6.53

North Carolina Winery Costs, Expenses and

Profitability as a Percentage of Winery Sales

Revenue

• For the following data, only wineries reporting that

winery costs, expenses and profit as a percentage

of sales revenue that summed to 100% were

included.

• As a result, 13 wineries were included in the

analysis.

9/1/2011 22Evans & Stoddard

9/1/2011 23Evans & Stoddard

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

19 10% 60% 33.32% 13.28%

Please tell us the percentage of your sales revenue that represents your

cost of goods sold (e.g., grapes, bottles, corks, etc., but not labor).

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

13 15% 70% 38.46% 13.96%

Please tell us the percentage of your gross sales that represents your labor

costs.

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

19 0% 68% 26.11% 18.17%

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

13 0% 40% 18.31% 12.80%

Please tell us the percentage of your gross sales that you spend on

marketing.

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

19 1% 50% 10.47% 11.18%

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

13 5% 20% 7.00% 4.32%

Please tell us the percentage of your gross sales that represent the

rest of your expenses (e.g., general and administrative expenses).

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

18 1% 68% 21.44% 17.09%

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

13 5% 45% 19.69% 13.47%

Of your gross sales, please tell us the percentage that represents your net

profit before taxes.

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

18 -22% 50% 10.33% 17.32%

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

13 0% 50% 16.54% 13.13%

Please tell us the total dollar value of your in-kind or monetary charitable

contributions.

2009 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

31 $0 $200,000 $10,611.29 $35,697.33

2010 Wineries

N Minimum Maximum Mean St. Dev.

20 $100 $15,000 $2,962.50 $3,602.59

Final Project Discussion

• The project provided insights into the performance of the

very young North Carolina wine industry and also

showed basic yearly trends.

• The survey instrument developed for the study worked

very well. We only changed a single question on the

marketing options used on the 2010 instrument.

• The North Carolina wine industry supported the project

and did provide data on a timely basis. However, future

efforts can still improve the sample size and response

rates.