View
218
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
1/27
Relation between Public Finance Reforms and
Poverty Reduction and Growth Strategy (PRGF)
Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Adviser
ADB ISPEFG, the Gambia, Banjul.
______________________________________________________________________
1. Introduction
This paper has two parts. Part-1 presents the Gambian case study on the interrelationsbetween PFM Reforms, PRSP, PRGF and MDGs. Part-2 presents an abridged version of
a comprehensive report prepared by the author as a Consultant for UN-ESCAP, Bangkok.
Thailand on the base of case studies in 14 selected countries in Asia and Pacific.
Part-I:
Case Study for the Gambia on the Interrelations
Between PFM Reforms, PRSP, PRGF and MDG
Contents of Presentation
1. Basic objectives of PFM reforms
2. Salient components of NDP, PRSP Report and MDG Report
3. Rationality of integrated policies4. The case study for the Gambia
5. Concluding observations
1. Basic objectives of PFM reforms
To maintain macroeconomic stability with moderate inflation and sustainedgrowth
Enhance fiscal discipline and accountability
Enhance revenue realization
Curtail unproductive expenditure Improve delivery and quality of public goods and services
To make subsidies targeted to the really needy and weaker sections of the society
All these objectives are also preconditions for high growth and poverty reduction.
2.1 Salient components of NDP, PRSP Report and MDG Report
MDG and PRSP reports deal with policies and programs to achieve MDGs. PRSP
has a focus on poverty reduction, but it also deals with other goals such aseducation, health, gender equality, environmental sustainability.
Reports emphasize that attainment of broad-based economic growth, which is
more inclusive, participatory, and stable over time, is a pre-requisite forsustainable reduction of poverty and unemployment.
All the countries have initiated various reforms and programs to enhance
efficiency of their economy; and are trying to mainstream MDG and PRSP intothe National Development Plans.
1
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
2/27
2.2 Stylized Policies and Programs under MDG and PRSP
a) Macro stabilization policies & PFM reforms;
b) Structural reforms in trade, industry, land, labor and capital marketsc) Sectoral priorities for poverty reduction and employment generation
d) Development of physical infrastructure and human capital
e) Conflict resolution, social development and environment protectionf) Direct poverty alleviation programs
g) Improving legal and institutional set-up
h) External Aid coordination and harmonizationi) Strengthening systems for measurement, evaluation, monitoring and review
3.1 Rationality of Integrated policies
Root cause of poverty is unemployment. Therefore, any poverty reduction program must focus on development of
employment-intensive sectors such as agriculture, SMEs, retail trade, transport
and communications.
However, poor cannot participate fully in these activities unless they areadequately skilled and healthy.
Therefore, improving education levels and health conditions of the poor andupgrading their skill are essential for poverty reduction.
But all these activities require higher revenue collection, private participation,
improvement in supply and quality of basic public services.
And so the need for PFM Reforms.
3.2 Role of macro-stabilization policies
Macro-economic volatility puts a break on economic growth. Stablemacroeconomic environment, with low inflation and sustainable fiscal deficit,
helps the poor to safeguard their purchasing power in years of natural calamities
or adverse business and trade cycles. High inflation hurts everybody particularly the poor as their incomes are not
indexed to prices, and thus increases the poverty ratio.
However, sound macro-economic polices have only limited capacity to alleviatepoverty as the trickle down effects of high growth may be uneven, slow, lagged
and time consuming.
We also need targeted poverty alleviation and employment generation programs.
3.3 Role of PFM reforms for poverty reduction
Various studies by the World Bank conclude:
PFM reforms lead to reduction of fiscal deficit, increased private investment,stable inflation.
Increased share of private sector in total investment leads to poverty reduction, as
private investment is more productive and more efficient than public investment. A reduction of fiscal deficit helps in poverty reduction, as it does not lead to
crowing out of private investment.
Increased share of investment in social sectors lead to poverty reduction.
2
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
3/27
Increased share of services in GDP lead to poverty reduction as they have higher
employment elasticities.
3.4 Lessons from country case studies
Broad-based growth and overall human development lead to attainment of other
millennium development goals such as universal education, gender equality, goodhealth, sustained environment and global partnership for development.
But, it is neither possible nor advisable to identify a unique set of policies or
programs which will hold good equally for all countries at all times. They depend on the countrys socio-economic-political environment.
3.5 Lessons from best practices
International best practices of development process indicate that a piece-mealapproach to development policy does not serve tangible results, rather delays
comprehensive reforms program, raises transitional costs and lengthens the
transition period to achieve desirable development goals.
Basic question is not: whether these policies or programs need to be taken. Ratherthe question is: how to prioritize and sequence these reforms and with what speed
and intensity? Again, a universal answer to this question is neither feasible nor desirable.
4.1 The Gambia PRSP-II (2007-2011) PRSP-II incorporated programs focused on the Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs) with the following overall strategic priorities:
a) macroeconomic stability and effective public resource management;
b) promotion of pro-poor growth and employment through private sectordevelopment;
c) improved basic social services;d) strengthened local communities and civil society organizations (CSOs); ande) Multi-sectoral programs on gender, environment, nutrition, and population.
4.2 PRSP-II of the Gambia- Pillars 1-2
PILLAR 1 - Create an enabling policy environment to promote economic growth
and poverty reduction
1.1. Macro-economic management1.2 Improve legal system
1.3 Civil service reforms
1.4 Public Utilities Regulation Reforms
Pillar-2: Improve productive capacity and social protection of the poor andvulnerable sections (MDG-I)
2.1-2.2 Agriculture, Fisheries & marine resources
2.3 -2.4 Tourism, and Industry2.5-2.6 Trade and Employment
2.7-2.8 Energy and Infrastructure
2.9 Telecommunication
3
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
4/27
4.3 PRSP-II of the Gambia- Pillars 3-4
PILLAR 3 - Improve coverage of the basic social service needs of the poor and
vulnerable [MDG 2, 4, 5 and 6]3.1 Health,
3.2 Basic Education,
3.3 Higher Education3.4 Water supply,
3.5 Sanitation,
PILLAR 4 - Build the capacity of local communities and Civil SocietyOrganizations (CSOs) to play an active role for poverty reduction
4.4 PRSP-II of the Gambia- Pillar-5
PILLAR 5 - Mainstream poverty-related cross-cutting issues into poverty reduction
[MDG 3, 6, 7]5.1 Gender,
5.2 HIV/ Aids,
5.3 Population
5.4 Nutrition,5.5 Climate change
5.6 Environment
4.5 PRGF- Medium Term Macroeconomic Framework
a) Real GDP growth rates of 4.66% a year;
b) Inflation falling to 6 percent in 2009 and to 5 percent in 2010;c) A reduction in governments domestic debt from 25.5 percent of GDP at end-
2008 to 17.3 percent at end-2011;
d) External current account deficits (including official transfers) falling from about16% of GDP in 2008 to about 12% in 2011; and
e) Rebuilding international reserves to cover at least 4 months of imports.
5.1 Fund-Bank Review of PRSP-II
Progress towards the MDGs is reported to be mixed. While the target of reducing
poverty to 15 percent (goal 1) is unlikely to be achieved, The Gambia has madesignificant strides in several areas including:
(i) Goal 2 on the achievement of universal primary education;
(ii) Goal 3 on the promotion of gender equality and empowerment of women; and
(iii) Goal 4 on the reduction of child mortality.5.2 Fund-Bank Review of PRSP-II
The Joint Staff Advisory Note (JSAN) on PRSP recommends the following
priority tasks by the government of the Gambia:a) developing a comprehensive agricultural sector strategy;
b) maintaining macro-economic stability
c) prioritizing improvement of governance; andd) Refining PRSP performance indicators.
e) The Fund-Bank recommends development of sectoral strategic plans and overall
Medium Term Expenditure Framework.
4
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
5/27
Selected References
Das, Tarun (2007) Inter-linkages between UN-MDGs, Poverty Reduction Growth
Strategy and National Development Plans - Selected Country Experiences from ESCAP,
Part-1, Main Report, pp.1-84, Part-2, Annexes, pp.1-78, UN-ESCAP, Oct 2007.
Das, Tarun(2003a) Role of Agro-based and Resource-Based Industries for Export Promotionand Poverty Alleviation in ESCAP countries, pp.1-126,ESCAP, UN, Bangkok, January 2003.
Das, Tarun (2003b) Economic Reforms in India- Rationale, Scope, Progress and UnfinishedAgenda, pp.1-80, Bankof Maharashtra, Pune, February 2003.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2003) Aligning the PRGF and the PRSP Approach:
Issues and Options, Washington D. C., April 25, 2003.
IMF, Independent Evaluation office (2004), Evaluation Report on PRSPs and the PRGF,
Washington D.C., July 7, 2004.
International Monetary Fund (2009a)The Gambia: Letter of Intent,Memorandum of Economic and Financial Policies, and TechnicalMemorandum of Understanding, pp.1-23, IMF, Washington D.C., 3February 2009.
International Monetary Fund (2009b) The Gambia: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
Annual Progress Report, IMF Country Report No. 09/75, pp.1-134, InternationalMonetary Fund, Washington, Feb 2009, available on IMF Website http://www.imf.org
under Country/the Gambia.
IMF and International Development Association (2009) the Gambia: Poverty
Reduction Strategy PaperAnnual Progress Report Joint Staff Advisory Note, IMF
Country Report No. 09/76, IMF and International Development Association, Feb 2009,Washington D.C.
Son, Hyun H. and Nanak Kakwani (2006) Global estimates of pro-poor growth, IPC Working
Paper series no.31, International Poverty Centre, Brazil.
United Nations, ADB and UNDP(2008)A Future Within Reach,2008.
United Nations International Poverty Centre (2007) Analyzing and Achieving Pro-poorGrowth, in Poverty in Focus, International Poverty Centre, Brazil, March 2007.
World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (2004)Poverty Reduction Strategy
PapersProgress in Implementation,pp.1-56, September 20, 2004.
National Planning Commission, Office of the President (2008), PRSP II Annual
Progress Report, January- December 2007, pp.1-132, May 2008.
5
http://www.imf.org/http://www.imf.org/8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
6/27
Part-II:
Abridged version of a Report prepared on the basis of
Case Studies in 14 selected countries in the Asia and PacificTarun Das, Macroeconomic Adviser
ADB ISPEFG, the Gambia, Banjul.
______________________________________________________________________
This paper is a part of a wider study made by the author as a Consultant for UN-ESCAP 1,Bangkok, Thailand in 2007 on the interrelationships among Millennium Development
Goals (MDG) Reports and strategies, National Development Plans (NDPs) and Poverty
Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) on the basis of case studies in 14 Asian countries viz.Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Laos, Maldives, Mongolia, Myanmar,
Nepal, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Thailand, Timor Leste.
1.1 Growth and Pro-poor Policies
The reduction of income poverty depends on sustained high economic growth. There is a
general consensus among the poverty experts, policy makers and multilateral funding anddevelopment agencies that a rise in per capita income is a major element in sustainable
poverty reduction. However, similar rates of growth can have very different impact on
poverty depending on the initial levels of income inequalities and different socio-economic-political environment over time and space (UNDP IPC 2007). A recent
working paper from the UNDP International Poverty Centre, Brazil (H. H. Son and N.
Kakwani 2006) presents regional and global estimates of growth and their pro-poornesson the basis of cross-country data for 237 growth spells in 80 low-and middle-income
developing countries during 1984-2001. The study indicated that there are large
variations not only in growth rates but also in the impact on poverty.
The study defined growth as pro-poor if poor households increase income proportionately
more than the non-poor (i.e. households above the poverty line). When growth is negative
i.e. in a recession, it is termed as pro-poor if the income decrease for the poor isproportionately less than that for non-poor households. The study indicated that of all the
237 growth spells under observation, 44.7 percent witnessed negative growth rates. In the
remaining 55.3 percent growth spells with positive growth rates, growth was pro-pooronly in 23.2 percent cases. Out of all the growth spells (including negative growth rates),
majority of the cases (accounting for 55.5 percent of total) were anti-poor (Table 1.1).
The study suggests that global growth processes have generally not been pro-poor.
1 Das, Tarun (2007) Inter-linkages between UN-MDGs, Poverty Reduction Growth Strategy andNational Development Plans - Selected Country Experiences from ESCAP, Part-1, Main Report, pp.1-84,
Part-2, Annexes, pp.1-78, ESCAP, United Nations, Bangkok, Oct 2007. Report was presented by the
author at the Regional MDG Workshop at Bangkok on 15-18 Oct 2007, and main conclusions of the
study published in a joint ADB-ESCAP-UNDP Report entitled A Future Within Reach,2008.
6
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
7/27
Table 1.1 Country grouping by pro-poor and anti-poor growth ratesCountry Groupings Positive growth Negative growth
Pro-
poor
Anti-
poor
Total Pro-
poor
Anti-
poor
Total
Low income countries 20.8 33.3 54.2 27.8 18.1 45.8
Low middle income 26.7 31.4 58.1 19.0 22.9 41.9
Upper middle income 21.7 35.0 56.7 21.7 21.7 43.3
Heavily indebted poor
countries (HIPC)
18.6 27.1 45.8 32.2 22.0 54.2
East Asia and Pacific 17.1 57.1 74.3 17.1 8.6 25.7
South Asia 29.4 52.9 82.4 11.8 5.9 17.6
East Europe and CentralAsia
12.3 21.1 33.3 21.1 45.6 66.7
Latin America and
Caribbean
30.4 29.1 59.5 24.1 16.5 40.5
Middle East and NorthAfrica
35.7 14.3 50.0 28.6 21.4 50.0
Sub-Saharan Africa 20.0 34.3 54.3 31.4 14.3 45.7
All countries 23.2 32.1 55.3 22.4 22.4 44.7
Source: H. H. Son (2007)
Above observations also hold good for Sub-Saharan Africa. Table 1.1 shows that in Sub-
Saharan Africa, growth rates were positive in 54.3 percent of the spells, but only 20percent of the spells witnessed both positive and pro poor growth. However, during
recession, majority of the spells were pro-poor indicating the respective
governments adopted adequate safety nets for the poor during the periods of
economic crisis.
Although cross-country regression analysis is subject to serious statistical estimationproblems, this study also investigated the relationship between different policies and
growth rates. It was observed that lower inflation and price stability are associated
with pro-poor growth. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the study found that low levels
of trade openness were significantly associated with positive growth and high level oftrade openness with negative growth, and there was no significant relationship between
trade openness and pro-poor growth.
There seems to be a broad consensus among analysts and policy makers that highergrowth is a necessary condition but not sufficient for poverty reduction. It needs to
be accompanied by pro-poor policies and strategies. But there is no consensus about how
7
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
8/27
to define and measure pro-poor growth. The International Poverty centre (IPC) at Brazil
initiated a debate on this issue among researchers in 2004-05 in a series of One-Pagers,
summarized in Number-6: Pro-poor growth; finding the Holy Grail. The March 2007Issue of the IPCs Journal Poverty in Focus carries this debate further and concludes
that much more pro-poor growth, whatever be the definition, is needed in most
2. Common Policies and Programs under MDG Reports and PRSP
This section analyses the stylized policies and programs advocated in both MDG Reports
and PRS Papers. It is observed that the attainment of stable and broad-based economic
growth, which is more inclusive and participatory, is a pre-requisite for sustainablereduction of poverty and unemployment.
This requires adoption of a comprehensive reforms program and policy package
encompassing stabilization policies and structural reforms, and measures for improvingboth physical infrastructure and human capital, strengthening institutional set-up,
improving governance and adopting targeted poverty alleviation programs.
The experiences of development process in many countries indicate that a piece-meal
approach to development policy does not serve tangible results, rather delay
comprehensive reforms program which leads to enhancement of transitional costs andlengthens the transition period to achieve desirable development goals.
2.1 Stylized Policies and Programs under MDG and PRSP
Both the MDG reports and the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) deal withpolicies, programs and strategies to achieve MDG targets. Although the PRSP has a focus
on poverty reduction, it also deals with other goals such as education, health, gender
equality, environmental sustainability and global partnership for development. Thereports emphasize that the attainment of broad-based economic growth, which is more
inclusive, participatory, and stable over time, is pre-requisite for sustainable reduction of
poverty and unemployment. It is observed from country case studies that all the countrieshave initiated a wide range of policies, reforms and programs to enhance efficiency,
productivity and international competitiveness and to impart dynamism to the overall
growth process with a focus on faster reduction of poverty, hunger, illiteracy and ill
health. These policies and program can be grouped under nine broad heads as below:
1. Macro stabilization policies and public finance reforms;
2. Structural reforms in trade, industry, land, labour and capital markets3. Sectoral priorities for poverty reduction and employment generation
4. Development of physical infrastructure and human capital
5. Conflict resolution, social development and environment protection6. Direct poverty alleviation programs
7. Improving legal and institutional set-up
8. External Aid coordination and harmonization
9. Strengthening systems for measurement, evaluation, monitoring and review
8
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
9/27
These broad policies are listed in details in Table-2.1. It may be emphasized at this stage
that all these polices and programs are interrelated and provide a package of reforms and
policies that need to be undertaken collectively by a country, although at varying degreesof coverage, scope and intensity depending on its size, level of development and socio-
political environment, for attaining sustained growth with poverty reduction. Broad-based
growth and overall human development will lead to attainment of other millenniumdevelopment goals regarding universal education, gender equality, good health, sustained
environment and global partnership for development. It is neither possible nor
advisable to identify a single policy or program which will satisfy all the
development goals or which will hold good equally for all countries at all times. Age-
old Tinbergen (1964) theory on planning techniques also states that a planner needs at
least the same number of policies as the number of objectives he is entrusted with.
The experiences of development process in many countries indicate that a piece-meal
approach to development policy does not serve tangible results, rather delay
comprehensive reforms program, which leads to enhancement of transitional costs
and lengthens the transition period to achieve desirable development goals. Thebasic question is not: whether these policies or programs need to be taken or not. Rather
the question should be: how to prioritize and sequence these reforms and with what speedand intensity? Again, a universal answer to this question is neither feasible nor desirable.
Even for a single country, an answer cannot be given without painstaking research and
modeling works which are beyond the scope of this report.
Table-2.1: Common policies and programs under MDG Reports and PRSPBroad Heads Detailedstrategies, policies and programs
1. Sustaining macroeconomicstability and macro liberalization
policies for enhancing growthwith poverty reduction andemployment generation
1.1 Fiscal and budgetary reforms and policies1.2 Monetary and credit policies
1.3 Medium Term Fiscal Sustainability1.4 Public expenditure reforms1.5 Medium Term Expenditure Framework
(MTEF)/ Expenditure Projection (MTEP)
2. Structural reforms to enhance
productivity and efficiency, and to
impart dynamism to overallgrowth process
2.1 Reduction and rationalisation of customs
duties and exports promotion
2.2 Decontrol, delicensing and deregulation ofindustrial production and investment
2.3 Public enterprises reform and privatisation
2.4 Private sector development and Public-
Private Partnership
2.5 Labour market reforms2.6 Financial and capital market reforms
2.7 Micro finance /micro insurance schemes
3. Sectoral priorities for poverty
reduction and employmentgeneration
3.1 Development of agriculture and irrigation
3.2 Development of employment-intensiveand agro-based industries
3.3 Development of small and medium sized
enterprises (SMEs)
9
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
10/27
4. Development of efficient
physical infrastructure and skilledhuman capital
4.1 Infrastructure development Power,
transport, telecommunications, water andsanitation
4.2 Social sectors development- education and
health
4.3 Forestry p policy5. Conflict resolution, social
development and environment
protection
5.1 Community participation5.2 Control of pollution and environmental
hazards
5.3 Economic and social security measures
5.4 Mainstreaming women and the excludedgroups through reservation in parliament
6. Direct poverty alleviationprograms for the target groups
6.1 Targeted employment generationprograms
6.2 Food for works programs, public works
programs for local communities
6.3 Housing programs for the poor7. Improving legal and institutional
set up7.1 Good governance and strengthening
institutional set up
7.2 Civil service and administrative reforms
7.3 Decentralization and local governance
7.4 Devolution of resources and
implementation of programs to the
subnational levels7.5 Strengthening Anti-Corruption Strategy,
Transparency and Accountability
7.6 Legal and Judicial Reform
8. External Aid coordination and
harmonization
8.1 Need for external resources
8.2 Aid coordination and harmonization8.3 Enhancing absorptive capacity
8.4 Encouraging foreign direct investment
9. Strengthening systems for
measurement, evaluation,
monitoring and review
9.1 Improving concepts, measurement and
analysis of poverty
9.2 Poverty monitoring and poverty mapping9.3 Output and outcome budgeting
10
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
11/27
2.2 Rationale for a package of policies and programs for poverty reduction
There is need to adopt a comprehensive package of programs to deal with poverty,
illiteracy and ill health. The major cause of poverty especially in income is
unemployment and underemployment. Therefore, any poverty reduction program must be based on generating remunerative employment opportunities through sustained high
growth and focusing on employment-intensive sectors such as agriculture, small and
medium enterprises and various kinds of services in retail trade, transport and
communications. However, poor cannot participate fully in these activities and contributeto economic development unless they are adequately skilled and healthy. Therefore,
improving education levels and health conditions of the poor and upgrading their skill
and capabilities are essential for poverty reduction. Therefore, we need a package ofpolicies and programs to attack simultaneously on unemployment, illiteracy, hunger and
disease. As these poverty reduction strategies require massive investment in
infrastructure and human capital formation, developing countries, particularly the leastdeveloped countries, need technical assistance and financial aid from the developed
community and international development and financial organisations.
2.3 Poverty traps at individual, local, national and global levels
The poor persons are caught by forces at the individual, local, national, and global levels
that combine to form a four-tiered poverty trap. At the individual level, factors includeskewed distribution of land and other assets, various demographic factors leading to
physical weakness and higher probability of disease and high fertility rate. At the local
level, poor faces greedy moneylenders and false promises by self-interested politicians,and has relatively lower power to fight against corrupt institutions. These are reinforced
at the national level by various policies ranging from tax laws to the sanction of
commercial credits that are generally pro-rich or anti-poor. At the global level, the poor
are held down by a mix of factors such as oppressive debt burdens, high interest rates,tied grants, falling export prices, and rising capital flight.
At the individual level, there are four factors that lead to poverty trap. The first
individual factoris the lack of productive assets. The poor are poor not only because they
earn less but also because they own less.
The second individual factor leading to poverty trap relates to physical weakness and
illness due to lack of nourishment, clean water, basic medical care, and adequate housing
space and sanitary services. Physical weakness often combines with low income to forma vicious circle of poverty and ill health.
High fertility rates form the third part of the individual poverty trap. The poor families
have larger size, larger proportion of children, irregular sources of livelihood, lowproductive jobs, high risk and insecure shelter and limited accessibility to basic services.
Rapid population growth and lack of sufficient employment opportunities force wages
down to the survival level, as the poor compete with each other for limited jobs.
11
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
12/27
Thefourth individual factorcombines a host of other demographic factors. The culture of
poverty theorists argue that poverty breeds poverty and a poor family has a high
probability of staying poor as these families are associated with high risks of ill health,high fertility rates, inadequate education and training and lack of dynamism. With the
progress of urbanization and rapid growth of services sectors, traditional joint families,
which provided limited but efficient mutual support networks within a family,progressively broke down into micro families, which are economically less viable.
Demographic factors interact with socio-economic and environmental factors. For anurban family a child is born by parental planning and family size is limited to the
necessary minimum. But in rural areas in a developing country, a child is regarded as an
asset and is expected simply because of normal life cycle progressions. Government is
trying to change this environment by suitable public policy on health and welfare. But thespread of education, economic incentives and facilities for family planning have marginal
impact on the fertility, net reproduction rates and the family size as socio-cultural
environment puts a constraint on the effectiveness of family planning.
At the local level, majority of the poor people live in rural areas. A poor family is
associated with extreme vulnerability to unforeseen expenses due to natural calamities,crop failures, fires, illness, funerals, and the costs of legal battles and bribes. To meet
these expenses a poor family very often borrows at usurious rates from greedy
moneylenders, piling debt on deprivation, or sell or mortgage at low rates whatever assets
they have such as land, livestock, family silver, house, tools, even their future labour.
Another factor leading to the local poverty trap is powerlessness of the poor. Ignorant ofthe law and without adequate resources to hire legal advice, the poor household is an easy
victim of exploitation by moneylenders, merchants, landlords, petty officials and police.
Aware of the power of the richer rural and urban people and their alliances with the
bureaucrats and politicians, the poor household avoids any activity, which mightendanger their employment, tenancy, loans or protection. There is a saying by the
peasants in province of West Bengal in India that Fishes cant afford to live on bad
terms with the crocodiles in the pool.
At the national level, poverty trap arises due to pro-elite or anti-poor public policies.
Public credit schemes for agriculture generally flow to the privileged rural groups or theso-called kulaks. Education budgets are similarly tilted towards the rich. University and
higher education is an excellent investment for any nation, but the poor need primary and
secondary education first. In health care, the same pattern emerges. Subsidized urban
hospitals take the lions share of public health budgets, but help those who least need
public assistance. Community-based health centres and rural clinics, which form thebackbone of a health care system and cater to the poor, are generally under funded.
At the international level, international development assistance explicitly targeted to help
the poorest of the poor has very often tended to benefit not the poorest population of a
country, but those who are nearer to the average income and the individuals in the middleand upper income brackets who have better knowledge of public policies and programs,
and better access to the government machinery.
12
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
13/27
2.4 Poverty and the Environment
Most of the worlds environmental threats, from ground-water contamination to air andnoise pollution and climate change, are byproducts of affluence. But poverty also leads to
ecological deterioration when people overexploit their resource base. The prevailing
conditions of poverty and unemployment force the poor people to live in slums andsquatter settlements without basic services and further degrade their environment. Rural
sector also faces the emerging environment problems. The pressure of land is exacerbated
by farmers needs to gather fuel wood and graze their livestock. Farmers burn animaldung and agricultural waste instead of using these resources for soil enrichment. Poor
people use forest resources as fuel wood leading to deforestation, which cause droughts.
The short-term needs force landless families to put forestland and mountain slopes on
cultivation. Environmental degradation, in turn, perpetuates economic deprivation, as
degraded ecosystems result in diminishing yields to their poor inhabitants and furtherimpoverishment of the population. A self-enforcing downward spiral of economic
deprivation and ecological degradation takes place. Pushed to the brink of starvation,
evicted from familiar lands and ancestral homes, or deprived of alternatives by misguided
laws, they lack access to sufficient quantities of food, land, water or capital to providethem with a sustainable livelihood.
3. Stylized Policy Package for Pro-Poor Growth
3.1 Macro Adjustment Policies
Macro adjustment policies are broadly divided into two groups- stabilization policies andstructural reforms. While stabilization policies aim at reducing macro economic
imbalances by attacking demand, structural adjustment policies aim at increasing supply
and improving productivity and growth by imparting competitiveness, efficiency and
dynamism to the system. These encompass the following specific measures:
Macro stabilization policies:
(a) Fiscal policies
(b) Monetary and credit policies
(c) Exchange rate adjustment(d) Tariff and price policies
Structural adjustment policies
(a) Reforms in trade and external sector(b) Reforms in industry and infrastructure
(c) Reforms in agriculture(d) Public sector reforms and privatisation
(e) Private participation and public-private partnership
(f) Factor market reforms- land, labour and capital markets
13
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
14/27
3.2 Reorientation of public policies
Almost all the countries of the world now are going through a phase of extensive market
reforms with an emphasis on the so-called LPG (viz. liberalization, privatisation and
globalization). There is a re-orientation of public policies and a change of the role of thegovernment from a controller to an enabler, from a supplier to a facilitator, from an
operator to a policy maker, and from a regulator to a trustee of social equity and
environmental sustainability. At present the basic job of the government is to createenabling environment for public-private partnership, to link fiscal, monetary and other
incentives to productivity, to streamline public investment and social welfare programs,
to repair market failures, and to strengthen institutional structures and legal system. There
is emphasis on greater decentralization in implementation, transparency in policy making,and consultations with stakeholders for greater public participation in development.
Two basic trends are affecting governance in most of the Asian countries. The firsttrend is decentralization i.e. increased administrative, political and fiscal power is
being transferred to the sub-national governments for implementation of programs,
particularly relating to social sectors. This means that the basic job of the nationalgovernment is to formulate policies and programs, monitor performance and
implementation, build institutional capacity, facilitate change and enforce standards and
quality. On the other hand, more powers and resources are being devolved to the sub-national governments.
The other trend is an emphasis on transparency and accountability in governance
and utilizing techniques such as performance and output-and-outcome based
budgeting. Output is the continuous or end result of a program, whereas outcome is the
medium-term or long-term impact of a program. Under results based budgeting systems,
line agencies enter into contracts or memorandum of understanding (MOUs) with the budget allocating ministry to deliver specified outputs in return for certain inputs
(personnel and financial resources). The system requires developing output and outcome
indicators and monitoring their trends over time.
There is a distinct change in the mindset of bureaucrats and the realization of a need for
greater co-ordination, co-operation and partnership with private economic agents fordevelopment. It is now recognized that both well-governed state and well functioning
markets are essential for high growth and sustainability, and Government and free
markets should supplement and complement each other. Government should withdrawfrom sectors where private participation would be more productive and more efficient,
and still the scope of government should remain large in development of social sectorsand physical infrastructure.
3.3 Role of Macro Stabilisation Policies for Poverty Reduction
Macro-economic stability is one of the necessary conditions for efficient development ofresource base of industries and poverty reduction. Macro-economic volatility puts a break
on economic growth. High and unpredictable inflation hurts everybody particularly the
14
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
15/27
poor as their incomes are not indexed to prices, and thus contributes directly to higher
poverty rates. However, sound macro-economic polices have only limited capacity to
alleviate poverty directly as the trickle down effects of high growth may be uneven andtime consuming. These policies should be directed at promoting growth through prudent
implementation of macro-economic goals, and eschewing direct interventions for
protecting the interests of the poor and for developing target groups of industries withemployment potential and comparative advantage.
Studies done by Dutt and Ravallion (1997), Ravallion and Dutt (1996) and the WorldBank (1998, 1999, 2000, and 2002) on the interrelations between poverty reduction and
macro stabilization policies made the following observations:
(a) An increase in per capita income is essential for reduction of poverty, as itgenerates extra income that can benefit the poor.
(b) Educational achievement facilitated by public investment in health allows the
poor to participate and contribute more in the economic growth process throughhigher and productive employment.
(c) Inflation had a negative effect on poverty reduction. Higher inflation in
developing countries is generally associated with monsoon failures and a
relatively higher rise in the price of food grains. The poor are doubly hit, as their
consumption basket is predominantly food, and their wages and demand forlabour in the years of poor harvests rise less than general prices.
(d) Services sectors are the fastest growing sectors in a developing economy andaccount for more than sixty per cent of GDP. These sectors have in general higher
employment elasticities. Their growth, therefore, helps in poverty reduction.
(e) An increasing share of private sector in total investment leads to poverty
reduction, as private investment is more productive and more efficient than the
public investment in many sectors.
(f) A reduction of fiscal deficit helps in poverty reduction, as it does not lead to
crowing out of private investment.
The relations of poverty with other variables lead to the following policy prescriptions:
(1) Higher growth rate of income than that of population is essential for povertyreduction as it provides extra income for distribution among the poor without
affecting adversely the well being and savings of the relatively richer households.
(2) While growth in per capita income is a necessary condition for poverty reduction, it
is by no means sufficient. It is important to create an enabling environment for the
poor so that they can participate in, and benefit from the growth process. The pro-
15
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
16/27
poor public policies include creation of employment opportunities and enhancing
the level of health, education and skill of the poor.
(3) A stable macroeconomic environment, along with low inflation and sustainablefiscal deficit, makes it possible for the poor to safeguard their purchasing power in
years of natural calamities or adverse business and trade cycles.
(4) The reduction of government deficit allows commercial and development banks to
provide more funds for private investment, which is more productive and more
efficient. It also allows the government to devote more scarce resources toinvestment in social sectors.
3.4 Fiscal Incentives
In many countries, various fiscal incentives and direct subsidies are provided for
development of health, education, sanitation, water supply and other social services.
Government also provides fiscal incentives such as tax holidays, deferment of taxes and
duties, concessional supply of land, power and other basic inputs to the industry. In manycases, the benefit has been marginal either because they are not available to small and
medium industries or they are more accessible to larger industries. Moreover, taxholidays have been less effective in the regional dispersal of industries, as industries tend
to be located near the main demand centres or regions with better infrastructure facilities.
Instead of providing tax breaks for industries, it may be more productive to develop basic
infrastructure facilities in backward areas through increased allocation of public funds.
A reform of government policies should redirect the focus from the microeconomic level
of the firm to the macroeconomic level of business and the economic environment.Instead of focusing on the different concessions to be provided, greater emphasis should
be placed on creating an enabling environment for long-term development of industries
and services. This may entail the dismantling of costly incentives and subsidies thatencourage inefficiency and waste in firms, increasing the availability of essential inputs
and bank credits for small and medium industries, and introducing a wide array of
marketing options and possibilities.
3.5 Role of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
All the developing countries are trying to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) andportfolio investment. FDI acts an engine of growth and embodies a package of important
sources of capital, technology, and managerial, marketing and technical skills. The
presence of multinationals promotes greater efficiency and dynamism in the domesticeconomy. The training gained by workers and local managers and their exposure to
modern organizational system and methods are valuable assets.
In order to improve private participation including foreign investment, developing
countries are unbundling risk in production, transmission and distribution of utilities,
improving public-private partnership through risk-sharing, rationalizing user charges, andstrengthening institutional, legal and regulatory framework. They are also separating
policymakers from service providers and regulators.
16
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
17/27
The diversity of experiences in Asian economies with respect of FDI requires different
policy approaches on the part of host countries. Those countries that have only recentlybeen open to FDI need to ensure that the open door policy is maintained and remains
stable. They should examine the possibility of a further 17liberalization of FDI regimes;
the harmonization of FDI and related policies on industry, trade and technology; andimproving the efficiency of their administrative set-up for investment approvals. In doing
so, all countries in the region should pay particular attention to the firms from
neighbouring countries, so as to capitalize the growing intra-regional investment. Specialattention needs to be given to small and medium-sized enterprises whose special needs
dictated by their limited financial and managerial resources and insufficient information
may call for incentives for the joint ventures. The Asian market has high potentials for
small and medium-sized TNCs.
3.6 Innovative Financing Techniques for the poor
There is a need for developing innovative financing measures for the poor such as settingup of venture capital funds, leasing and hiring companies, mortgage finance companies,
factoring companies,trade credit suppliers and micro finance.
Micro Finance
Development of micro-finance promotes economic growth, thereby contributing to
poverty alleviation. Not only financial development fosters economic growth and creates
employment opportunities for the poor, but also helps to mobilize savings.
Micro-finance institutions (MFIs) can be defined as formal, semi-formal, or informal
providers of financial services to low-income clients, including the self-employed.
Financial services generally are restricted to lending although some MFIs also providesavings, insurance and payments services. The Bangladesh Gramin Bank is a success
story of micro finance institution helping the poor.
There are a number of reasons why MFIs are likely to bring benefits to the poor. MFIs
enjoy better local knowledge and proximity, which is an important advantage because the
majority of poor households live in vast rural areas that are underserved by thecommercial banks. Furthermore, the semi-formal and informal MFIs complement the
formal financial system by providing financial services to those who have limited access
to the formal financial system.
However, the importance of micro-finance as an instrument of poverty alleviation shouldbe treated with caution. The quality of the loan portfolio of MFIs is often poor because of
inadequate management. A large number of these institutions are not efficient andsurvive on subsidies from their donors. Lending rates charged by MFIs are usually very
high. The linkages between MFIs and commercial banks are often weak. Replication of
successful MFI models is often impossible due to differences in demographic or culturalcontexts. Finally, there are still no countries with a comprehensive network of micro-
finance institutions.
17
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
18/27
3.7 Sectoral Policies
3.7.1 Rationale for development of agriculture
And agro-based SMEs for poverty alleviation
In many developing countries, agro-based and resource-based SMEs contribute
significantly to GDP growth, employment generation and poverty alleviation. In general,SMEs have higher labour elasticity and have grown at a higher rate than overall industrial
sector. This proves their ability to compete globally.
But, SMEs face a number of problems and constraints, such as outdated technology andlow productivity, lack of skill of labour and management, infrastructure constraints, low
economies of scale, lack of modern marketing, high cost of domestic credit and lack of
foreign investment, and increased competition due to removal of quantitative restrictions
and reduction of customs duties. A wide range of opportunities can be seized by small-scale and labour-intensive industries for additional employment and poverty alleviation if
suitable government policies are taken to remove these constraints.
The experiences of India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, China, Korea, Indonesia, Thailand,
Philippines, Japan and Singapore suggest that given appropriate program and policy
assistance, SMEs can make substantial contributions not only to output and employmentbut also to exports (Das 2003a). Rather than general subsidies, selective support may be
extended to qualified firms and industries only with fixed term finance for the specific
purpose of assisting them to become competitive.
Rationale for promoting agro and resource based SMEs lies in their valuable
contributions to employment generation and poverty alleviation. These enterprisescontribute significantly to poverty alleviation and promote economic and social justice by
employing a significant portion of the poor and low skill work force, which may
otherwise remain unemployed or under employed. Higher employment in rural areashelps in reduction of inequalities, development of backward areas and balanced regional
growth and development.
The poor persons cannot participate in the growth process for reasons of extremedeprivation or vulnerability combined with poverty or face continuing exposure to risks
of ill health and malnutrition, which may jeopardize their ability to participate in the
opportunities offered by growth. Employment generated by the SMEs provides effectivesafety nets that insure rural poor against the income fluctuations.
Development of agro-based and resource-based industries provides opportunities for thegrowth of economic activities in the informal sector and micro enterprises in both rural
and urban areas. The informal sector remains an important source of income and
employment for the poor and self-employed in developing countries. This sector is very
diverse and covers multiple economic activities ranging from petty trading and personal
18
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
19/27
and domestic services to manufacturing, transport and construction. The social groups
include artisans and craftsmen, hawkers, fruits and vegetable vendors, women, and daily
laborers for construction and other services. Employment or ownership of microenterprise provides the poor with a source of empowerment and income security and
enables them to participate actively in rural and overall economic development.
Agro-based industries open up new channels of distribution and marketing for
agricultural commodities produced by the small and marginal farmers and raise their
incomes. Development of resource-based industries, particularly SMEs, in rural areasleads to valorization of agricultural land, agricultural commodities and other resources.
Locations of agro-based SMEs in rural areas help to distribute the benefits of economic
growth broadly among the rural poor. They also improve value addition and productivityof rural industries through wider distribution networks and greater access to both internal
and external markets. A dynamic SMEs sector serves not only to create employment but
also to earn foreign exchange through exports, upgrade the quality of the labour force and
diffuse technological know-how throughout the economy. These industries help tomobilize domestic resources by utilizing the savings, labour and agricultural raw
materials that otherwise remain idle. They serve the low-income consumer markets andproduce a wide variety of goods that also include sophisticated products for export.
The location of small and medium industries in rural areas creates livelihood
opportunities that help to stop migration to urban centres. They provide a training groundfor the small-scale entrepreneurs and business management personnel, who may later join
larger undertakings.
The role of financial markets as an instrument to promote SMEs and to alleviate poverty
is generally focused on supplying credit facilities. However, credit is only one of the
financial services that the poor need. Access to bank accounts or savings facilities in therural areas is equally important. For example, people who extract their income primarily
from agriculture must build up financial assets following harvests to sustain themselves
for the rest of the year. Even the poorest households are eager to save if they can obtainpositive real interest rates and there are conveniently located deposit collecting facilities.
This point has been confirmed by the experience in Bangladesh and Indonesia.
Integration of SMEs into global market offers the potential for more rapid growth andpoverty reduction. Increased market access for agricultural products would work to
directly address poverty reduction in developing countries. While the rapid expansion of
demand for unskilled labour in manufacturing and urban services in many developingcountries has sharply reduced rural poverty, about three-quarters of the worlds poor still
live in rural areas, where agriculture is often the dominant economic activity (Das
2003a). Agriculture accounts for about 27 per cent of GDP in developing countries, asimilar share of exports and 50 per cent of employment. This dependency on agriculture
is even higher in LDCs. But agricultural markets are among the most heavily distorted
and attract tariffs several times higher than those facing manufactured imports.
19
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
20/27
Historically, textiles and clothing (T&C) have played a unique role in economic
development and poverty reduction. Their contribution to the Industrial Revolution inWestern Europe and North America in the 18 th and 19th centuries is well known, and they
continued to spearhead industrialization in many developing countries in the 20 th century.
Since textile and clothing production often requires only simple technology and isintensive in unskilled labour, many developing countries have a strong comparative
advantage in these sectors. In the mid-1960s, developing countries accounted for 15 per
cent of world textile exports and less than 25 per cent of world clothing exports. By 1998,these shares had reached 50 per cent and 70 per cent, respectively. However, the sector
has also long been a prime target for protectionism.
Despite these positive aspects, SMEs are criticized for their inability to realize economiesof scale in procurement and production, and to have higher costs of production. In many
countries, SMEs exist on the strength of costly government support programs in terms of
several fiscal, monetary and other concessions.
3.8. Targeted Pro-poor Policies
Various empirical studies by Ahluwalia (1990), Chakravarty (1990) and the World Bank(2000 and 2003) concluded that higher economic growth, with a focus on pro-poor
economic policies, is a key driver of poverty reduction. A research study by Ghura, Leite
and Tsangarides (2003) also observed that some public policies are super pro poor i.e.
they appear to directly influence the incomes of the poor. On the basis of cross-country
econometric relations, they concluded the following:
(i) Countries with higher income shares of the poor are characterized by higher
macroeconomic stability, lower income inequality, higher literacy, more democraticinstitutions, better governance, better internal environment, more open traderegimes and higher levels of financial development than those in other countries.
(ii) Economic growth is an important factor in raising the incomes of the poor.
(iii) Certain public policies have direct impact on the incomes of the poor, even after
taking into the effect of growth. These include policies that lower inflation, shrinkthe size of the government, promote financial deepening, and raise the educational
level. The policies are considered super pro- poor because they raise the incomes
of the poor directly, as well as indirectly through economic growth. The direct andindirect effects are mutually reinforcing, and there is thus no trade-off between
growth promotion and poverty alleviation.
(iv) The poor are significantly vulnerable to adverse movements in the terms of trade
and acceleration of inflation rates as their incomes are not indexed to prices.
(v) A number of variables, such as trade openness, investment rate, the extent ofdemocracy, life expectancy, and civil wars that are generally shown to affect
economic growth do not directly influence the incomes of the poor.
20
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
21/27
Most of the Asian economies have introduced several employment generation and
poverty alleviation programs over the years. The ongoing economic reforms have also a
human face and are trying to strengthen the anti-poverty programs and to provide safetynets to the vulnerable sections that might be adversely affected by structural changes. In
the past, public expenditures for poverty alleviation in the form of subsidies and price
controls tended to be captured mostly by the better off and funded by the fiscal deficits.These policies may have harmed the poor through the adverse effects of inflation. More
recently, progress in poverty reduction has been attributed to policies that enabled more
rapid economic growth than in the past by shifting public expenditure away from industrytowards development of physical infrastructure and human capital and other social
concerns, and by improving targeting of poverty reduction programs through changes in
the public distribution system and involvement of civil societies and NGOs for
formulation, implementation and monitoring of poverty alleviation programs.
Any country needs to reformulate an anti-poverty strategy that is fiscally
sustainable and more finely targeted to those who truly cannot benefit from the
opportunities offered by growth. Safety nets should focus on those who either cannot
participate in the growth process (such as for reasons of extreme deprivation, lack of
productive assets such as land and capital or vulnerability combined with poverty) or facecontinuing exposure to risks, which may well jeopardize their ability to participate in the
opportunities offered by growth. Effective safety nets that insure rural poor against the
income fluctuations, such as public works programs, are also essential in overcomingimportant market failures.
3.9 Development of Efficient Infrastructure and Human Capital Formation
3.9.1 Infrastructure Development
Power, water, industrial estates, roads, telecommunications and a clean environment are
some of the more critical aspects of infrastructure for doing business. Production andcommerce are heavily dependent on these inputs. Development of proper legal and
institutional set up and efficient infrastructure are, therefore, essential for inducing
industrial development, employment generation and overall economic growth.
In open and developed economies, such as Singapore and Hong Kong, only minimal
investment laws and regulations exist and administrative costs are negligible. Most of thedeveloping countries face infrastructure constraints. The experiences of China, Indonesia,
Malaysia, Taiwan and Thailand suggest that the faster an economy is reformed and
infrastructure is built, the greater would be the participation of private investmentincluding foreign investment. Regulations need to be made simpler and more transparent,
and their administration may be made more efficient.
The World Wide Web is changing the face of the market place. Information is beingdescribed as the fifth factor of production in addition to land, labour, capital and
entrepreneurship. Databases on market related and financing related information need to
be identified and made accessible in a user-friendly manner. Government must providemore information related to poverty reduction, health, education and other social services
through the Net.
21
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
22/27
3.9.2 Human Resource Development
Along with efficient physical infrastructure, skill labour is a critical factor for enhancingproductivity and efficiency of the more dynamic traded goods and services sectors.
Technological and organizational innovations drive foreign investment into those
countries, which have trained and skilled workforce and fairly high educationalstandards. This explains the overriding importance of developing countries to invest more
in the development of human resources, infrastructure and services. It also highlights the
risk of the least developed countries (LDCs) of being marginalized due to infrastructureconstraints and lack of skilled labour.
The existence of a dynamic local business sector creates a supportive environment
through efficient networks of local suppliers, service firms, consultants, partners orcompetitors. It is, therefore, necessary to concentrate efforts on the development of local
entrepreneurship. Equally important is the availability of high quality telecom and
transport systems, energy supply and other utilities.
While improving education, special care needs to be taken to ensure gender equality as
research shows that gender inequality in education and employment has a negativeimpact on economic growth and notably on poverty reduction (Stephen Klasen 2006).
Gender inequality has much more adverse impacts on growth rates than on overall
income inequality.
Another key finding is that women tend to devote a larger share of households resources
to most essential activities of a household (Janet Stotsky 2006). Women are also more
oriented toward productive savings and investments behaviour though they are less likelyto take financial risk. In general, women are less corrupt and their political empowerment
supports a larger role of public insurance. It is, therefore, desirable to formulate country-specific policies for promoting pro-poor growth through reduction of gender inequality.
3.9.3 Legal, Institutional and Regulatory system
It is also necessary to strengthen the regulatory system and the legal and institutional set-
up for orderly growth of industries. As regards the limits and nature of governmentintervention in private sector activities, it is necessary to devise optimal rules for
regulatory system, which while servicing its legitimate purpose will not transcend its
limits to the disadvantage of the private sector development. First, any policy affecting
allocation of resources and regulation of private sector needs to be transparent and basedon a specified set of procedures. Second, even when there is strong presumption in favor
of government intervention, it is imperative to limit it to minimum necessary scale.
Third, from amongst the available alternative regulatory sets, it is necessary to go in forone, which provides the least scope for rent seeking.
Along with deregulation, more important measures are needed to be directed towardscreating a legal and institutional infrastructure for the smooth functioning of the private
22
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
23/27
sector. This is well illustrated by the Indonesian experience. Though Indonesias
industrial policy, trade and financial sector reforms were deep and sweeping, they failed
to get a full pay-off as Indonesia lagged in changing its corporate law and other laws vitalto trade and industry. Similar was the case with issues of land and property rights.
An important lesson from the East Asian development experience is that a holisticapproach to deregulation is more productive than a partial deregulation in any one sphere
say in industrial policy which is divorced from any reform in other areas. Domestic
deregulation should proceed pari pasu with 23liberalization of trade and tariffs in order toensure optimal allocation of resources between traded and no-traded goods.
3.9.4 Competent and Committed Bureaucracy
Another important institutional prerequisite appears to be the establishment of a
competent economic bureaucracy. The complexity and difficulty ofmanaging targeted poverty reduction programs places high demands on
the economic administrators for policy formulation and planning,
evaluation and monitoring outputs and outcomes. Bureaucrats must be
able to balance financial support for targeted programs with penalties fornon-performance. The economies of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, China
had economic bureaucracies capable of imposing discipline on private
sector. In short, management of a set of successful industrial policiesrequires a stable macroeconomic framework and committed economic
bureaucracy capable of running complex pricing policies and objectively
running public subsidy schemes.
3.10Regional Economic Co-operation
Regional economic cooperation promotes technology and capital transfer and helps toaccelerate growth of trade and industry. The successful use of strategic trade, industrial
and macro-economic policies in South East Asia led to a pattern of regional division of
labour, described as the flying geese model. As the leading economies in the regionsuccessfully shifted from resource-based and labour-intensive industries to sophisticated
manufacturing activities, they provided space for the less developed countries to enter
simpler manufacturing stages. Regional trade and investment flows played a central rolein this process by helping to create markets and by the transfer of skills and technology to
neighbouring countries. The challenge now lies in the extension of this regional dynamics
and the growth pattern to include newly emerging countries such as China and India, aswell as other less developed countries in South and East Asia (Das 2002).
Since regional economic arrangements imply close interdependence among a group of
economies, there is the risk of contagion effect that problems in one country may betransmitted to its neighbors. In fact, a number of financial problems in the regional
integration at the end of 1990s contributed to volatile capital flows fuelling a boom-bust
cycle in East Asian economies. Thus, maintenance of a stable and rapid regional growthneeds not only credible economic policies for upgrading of production and exports, but
23
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
24/27
also appropriate regional arrangements to ensure the stability of financial markets,
including lending facilities and agreement on a sustainable pattern of exchange rates.
3.10.1 Technical Assistance
For stronger regional integration in South Asia as well as East and Southeast Asia, manycountries are starting to coordinate and harmonize policies for tariffs, taxation,
investment and business regulations. But the most productive impetus to regional
integration would come from removing the restrictions on movements of goods, capital,and people and improving the transport and communications connectivity among the
countries, particularly among the neighbors. Regional integration is also likely to get a
boost from strengthening the regional growth centres in South Asia and Southeast Asia.
These could produce important pull effects on growth throughout the continent. Theywould help promote FDI by enlarging markets. But regional integration should not be a
substitute for globalisation, but should be a means to strengthen it.
The international organizations like the World Bank, IFC, IMF, Asian DevelopmentBank, UNDP, UNICEF, UNIDO and UNCTAD are engaged in the provision of technical
assistance, consultancy and advisory services with regard to the development of theprivate sector, infrastructure and human resource development, and promotion of non-
debt-creating financial flows. The regional organizations can spur institutional progress
by providing forum for high-level discussions on Asian solutions to Asian problems and
by providing a framework for collective policy actions for poverty reduction,development of technology and higher education, environment sustainability, and control
of HIV/ AIDS and other communicable diseases.
3.10.2 Official Development Aid (ODA)
Donors of foreignaid expect it to boost investment and aggregate demand by transferring
real resources to recipient countries. Furthermore, attaining the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs) calls for substantial increases in aid in order to strengthen domesticinvestment and expenditures on development of infrastructure and social sectors. Yet, the
IMF has been encouraging some of the poorest countries, particularly in Sub Saharan
Africa (SSA) to adopt restrictive policies that prevent the transfer of real resources fromabroad, including capital imports. A recent report by the Independent Evaluation Office
of the IMF, entitled The IMF and Aid to Sub-Saharan Africa, 2007, found that SSA
countries with an IMF Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) spent an averageof only 28 per cent of aid flows during 1999-2005. This report also sates that only 63 per
cent of aid flows to Sub-Saharan Africa were absorbed during 1999-2005. The
remaining 37 per cent were used to stockpile reserves (Lapavitsas 2007).
This implies that not only the italicization of committed ODA is low butalso the aid receiving country does not have the adequate absorptivecapacity. This is due to various restrictions on utilization of aid. Thereis need to Liberalise some of these policies by the donor countries and
24
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
25/27
allowing aid to be utilized even for operational expenditure related tothe achievement of MDG targets.
The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the UN World Summit(2005) also underscore the emerging consensus for a new aid
environment focusing on national ownership, convergence aroundnational planning processes, capacity building, harmonization ofpolicies, results and mutual accountability, and realignment with theMillennium Development Goals (MDGs).
3.11 MDG and PRSP Coordination
Both the MDG reports and PRSP put emphasis on the need for aneffective, efficient and coordinated policies and programs at thecountry level. They fully support national priorities and developmentneeds as indicated in the national plans. There is also emphasis on
analysis, reporting and monitoring poverty, hunger and otherdevelopment indicators over time, integration of the goals into nationaldevelopment plans or poverty reduction strategies, andimplementation and operational activities.
The UN Country Team (UNCT) also undertook a number of initiatives tohelp countries meet their MDGs in areas such as poverty, hunger andfood security, governance, natural resource management, education,land rights, water supply, micro-credit, social services, HIV/AIDS andgender. It provided support to formulation of national developmentplans, poverty reduction strategies, promotion of broad civil society
participation; costing of the MDGs; identification of opportunities forimplementation, advocacy for pro-poor policy reforms, service deliveryand national capacity building in the areas of statistics, monitoring,reporting, planning and budgeting.
3.12 Ten Commandments of pro-poor growth
It may be mentioned here that recently in a study for the International Poverty Centre;Mwangi S. Kimenyi has proposed 10 Commandments of pro-poor growth. The basic
notion is that the policies must be designated to stimulate growth in those sectors and
areas in which the poor people earn their livelihood.
The 10 Commandments suggest that pro-poor reform policies should:
(i) Target activities, which most poor are involved in;
(ii) Improve the functioning of markets where poor people participate;
(iii) Target low-skill, labour intensive economic activities;
(iv) Integrate markets for the poor by improved forward and backward linkages;(v) Ring-fence public expenditures for raising capabilities of the poor;
25
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
26/27
(vi) Target those groups that operate outside the markets;
(vii) Include a food security policy;
(viii) Include policy initiatives that protect vulnerable populations from shocks;(ix) Include policies that support accumulation of tradable assets by the poor; and
(x) Improve institutions that empower the poor with increased diffusion of power.
26
8/9/2019 Relations between PFM and PRGF
27/27
Selected References
Ahluwalia, Montek Singh (1990) Policies for poverty alleviation, Asian Development Review,Vol.8, No.1, pp.111-132, Asian Development Bank, Manila.
Besley, Timothy and Louise J. Cord (2006) Delivering on the Promise of Pro-poor Growth,Palgrave, New York.
Bouch, Nathalie, Carl Riskin, Li Shantong, Ashwani Saith, Wu Guobao and Wang
Huijiong (2006) Macroeconomics of Poverty Reduction- The Case Study in China, pp.1-150,
United Nations Development Programme, New York, 2006.
Chakravarty, S. (1990) Development strategies for growth with equity: The South Asian
experience,Asian Development Review, 8(1), pp.133-159, Asian Development Bank, Manila.
Das, Tarun (2007) Inter-linkages between UN-MDGs, Poverty Reduction Growth
Strategy and National Development Plans - Selected Country Experiences from ESCAP,
Part-1, Main Report, pp.1-84, Part-2, Annexes, pp.1-78, UN-ESCAP, Oct 2007.
Das, Tarun(2003a) Role of Agro-based and Resource-Based Industries for Export Promotionand Poverty Alleviation in ESCAP countries, pp.1-126,ESCAP, UN, Bangkok, January 2003.
Das, Tarun (2003b) Economic Reforms in India- Rationale, Scope, Progress and UnfinishedAgenda, pp.1-80, Bankof Maharashtra, Pune, February 2003.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2003) Aligning the PRGF and the PRSP Approach:
Issues and Options, Washington D. C., April 25, 2003.
IMF, Independent Evaluation office (2004), Evaluation Report on PRSPs and the PRGF,
Washington D.C., July 7, 2004.
Khan, A. R. (2007) Asian experience on Growth, Employment and Poverty, An overview with
special reference to the findings of some recent country studies, International Labor Office (ILO).
Kimenyi, Mwangi S. (2007) Ten Commandments of Pro-Poor Growth, in Poverty in Focus,International Poverty centre, Brazil, March 2007.
Son, Hyun H. and Nanak Kakwani (2006) Global estimates of pro-poor growth, IPC Working
Paper series no.31, International Poverty Centre, Brazil.
United Nations, ADB and UNDP(2008)A Future Within Reach,2008.
United Nations International Poverty Centre (2007) Analyzing and Achieving Pro-poorGrowth, in Poverty in Focus, International Poverty Centre, Brazil, March 2007.
World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (2004)Poverty Reduction Strategy
PapersProgress in Implementation,pp.1-56, September 20, 2004.
Recommended