View
57
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Rapid Acquisition. OSD CAPE Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. Purpose. How to not make the SD the PM for rapid acquisition items. Current process requires senior leader involvement How to balance urgent needs against the risk the system is willing to take - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
March 10, 2011
Rapid Acquisition
OSD CAPECost Assessment and Program Evaluation
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
O S D
How to not make the SD the PM for rapid acquisition items
Purpose
2
• Current process requires senior leader involvement How to balance urgent needs against
the risk the system is willing to takeHow fast is it required, how much is the
department willing to pay, and how much oversight is required
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
O S D C A P E
Current Acquisition ModelSe
nior
Lea
der I
nvol
vem
ent
Tota
l Pro
gram
Cos
ts
Complexity & Risk
TheaterLocal Cmd
SAE
MDA
BTR
Theater Funding
ATR
OCO
POM
COTS/GOTSPO Integration
Days Weeks Months Quarters Year Years
DSD
SD
S&T at Government Labs
Using Existing Authsand Contracts
5000CAT I
Easy with No Risk Difficult with Risk
Need to Delivery Time
ProgrammingRe-ProgrammingYear of Execution
To shorten time requires more sr ldr involvement
MRAP
SDB/C-130Laser JDAM
SM-6
MC-12 Liberty
GH
JIEDDO
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
O S D C A P E
Rapid Acquisition Requirements Process
4
Identify Validate Prioritize
Capability Requirement Validation Pick a Solution
Develop Demonstrate
ProcureDemonstrate
Procure
Procure
OR
ORSustain & Transfer
Sustain &Transition
OR
Then Integrate to a Service or Agency
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
O S D C A P E
How Can a Program Get an EZ-Pass?
5
• High priority JUON that must be tracked• Requires funding
Initial (break another program, colorless?) O&S costs must be signed up for
• Requires Service support or buy-in• Requires breaking thru the risk adverse nature
of the system it is being procured from• Government must take on a large integration
role Established relationships with contractors Team in place
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
O S D C A P E
Rapid Acquisition Future Developments
6
• Standing up a DoD-wide program officeCurrent organizations are commodity specific Ad-hoc from current program offices
• Streamlining how the requirements come inJCIDS is not nimble enough How to create a more open process
• Appropriating colorless multi-year fundingKeeping Congress informed Transition/transfer to services or agencies
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
O S D Laser JDAM
7
• CSAF directed QRC--Weapons to GWOT in 15 month• Requirements:
• CSAF go-ahead Mar 07; Requirements signed Apr 07• Requirements did not change even with addition of Navy
• Technology:• Boeing initial investment, development and demonstration
• Funding:• Initial R&D funding ($6M) from Warfighter Rapid Acquisition
Program in 1 month• Initial production funds ($20M) reprogrammed in 2 months • Follow-on funding kept pace with need
• $6M R&D in 4 months; Navy funding in 8 months • Team:
• Existing JDAM program office used for LJDAM• Supported tailored processes
Enablers• Rapid receipt of initial funding• Agile support from testers• Accelerated decision process
Sep 2006 CENTAF Urgent Need for Engaging Fast Moving Targets
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
O S D Precision Lethality MK-82
8
2009 JUON for Very Low Collateral Damage Weapon• Requirements: RAC directed QRC for USCENTCOM
• Direction from JRAC Mar 10, R&D started May 10. Requirements finalized Aug 10, 4 months into effort.
• Penetration and forward fuzing not critical to low collateral damage. Added 4 months to development effort.
• Technology:• Composite technology integrated on a fielded system, JDAM
• Funding: Unconventional funding sources• SPR leads to reprogramming of $11M SAF/AQ funds for tech
maturation through an AFRL ongoing effort • $29.5M RDT&E OCO money provided Aug 10• $20M RDT&E & $31M production provided by JRAC Oct 10
• Team: AAC & AFRL Lab partnership key to success• AFRL led tech maturation effort w/transition to AAC • New AAC program office stood up. Fulfills Sys Integrator role• Organic system level design and system logistics support
Enablers• Early Funding – Available for
effort• People – Committed to
Warfighter• Flexibility• Rapid decision making ability • Adapt to change daily• Agile support from testers
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Back Up Slides
9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
O S D
10
JCTDBreakfastClub
450 FLMs
FY06 FY07 FY08
MS C
1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr
Technology Transition
AFRL Technology Development Program(25 Arena, Sled & Howitzer Tests)
JCTDIntegration/TestProgram
Live Flight Test
Static Live Fire Tests
Weaponeer Workshops3 Phase Military UtilityAssessment
1 Qtr
Contract Award
Guided Test Vehicle Flights
FLM’sDD-250’d
Original Fielding Schedule (50)
50
Residuals Sustainment
Focused Lethality Munition (FLM)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
O S D
15 Month Timeline
Laser JDAM
11
J A S O N D J F M D
J A M J J A S O N
JFY07 FY08 FY09
Direction
F
DON 1st 50Requirement
AF 1st 50Requirement
M
AF 400thRequirement
M
AF R&D $
AF Prod $
Navy Rqmt
Final AF $
50 100 200
300
Long-Lead Procurement
50 100
AF Units
Navy Units
FDR1
FDR2
FCAProducibility Enhancements
FAAT 1/OUE
FAAT 2
Stationary Target Eval
Obj A/C Integration and Moving/Maneuvering Target Eval
PRR1
NavyFY08 Funds
PRR2 (Elbit)
PRR2 (ESA)
1st OperationalEngagement
Milestones
Contract Actions - UCA - Definitization
Qualification - Design
- Logistics
- Software (Blk 7)
- AF Testing
- Navy Testing
Operational UnitProduction
Fielding
400
200
FDR1/PRR1/FAAT 1 – SDD+ ConfigurationFDR2/PRR2/FAAT 2 – LRIP Configuration
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
O S D
BLU-129/B QRC Schedule
12
AFRAA
FY2010 FY2011
50 RAA
M NJ A S O D J F M A JMM A J A S NO D J F MFY2012
SRR CDR
Arenas
PHST
Warhead Aging Study
TRR
Design Margin Lethality
SledDesign Margin Sleds
A/C Flt Certification
EOD Eval
Flt Clear(O)
Final TDP Post-IOC TRR
Objective Live Flights
Risk Reduction CFP - Captive Flt ProfileCTV - Controlled Test Vehicle DVT - Design Verification TestingEGTV - Environmental Guided Test VehicleIM – Insensitive MunitionsPHST – Packaging, Handling, Storage, TransportationRAA – Required Assets AvailableTDP – Technical Data Package
WARHEAD MANUFACTURING
5-month post-IOC Transition from QRC
CTV
Fielding Recommendation
RISK REDUCTIONANDQRC RDT&E
DIRECTIONRQMNTSFUNDINGCONTRACTS
RR CA
JRAC Direction
RDT&E OCO $
AFRL $
Sled
4.5-month RR
Ground Rules/Assumptions• No key requirements changes• BLU-129 ~ legacy MK82 (except roll inertia)• No JDAM OFP change allowed• Receive IM waiver for initial fielding • Receive high priority on test range • JDAM / LJDAM kits and fuzes are GFE• Warhead characterization, design margin and
objective testing post-IOC• Paveway II certification dates TBD
AF Rqmt’s
DT/OT OUE Rpt
J
JTCG/MEWeaponeering
DoN Rqmt’s
Capability Transition Review
Closeout
Time Now
RDT&E CA
PDR
CFP
NNMSB Approval
Fit Checks
Arena
Structural Data Package
EGTVs
Case DVTs
Qual
AFSEO
FAI/PCA
RDT&E/Prod Reprog $
TRL Readiness Review
Initial TDP
8-month IOC
McAlester Qual
Margin DVTs
Navy safe Sep/Cats & Traps
Navy Fleet Clearance
E3/HERO
PRR
Prod CA
USN Exp Quals
IM/Haz Class Tests
Warhead Surveillance Plan
USN Flt Test
Environmental /Safety
Lethality Evaluation Point
Test Clear (T)
Tech Orders
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
O S D Focused Lethality Munition (FLM)
13
2006 Urgent Need for Low Collateral Damage Weapon• SECAF directed JCTD--Weapons to GWOT in 18 mos• Requirements: Well defined from JCTD process
• Limited blast zone and focused lethality• Requirements were fluid. Penetration requirement reduced
• Technology:• Composite technology integrated on a fielded system, SDB
• Funding: Out of cycle JCTD• SAF/AQ found $10M. Initial $6M went directly to AFRL,
$3.6M managed by AAC for AFRL. • Follow on funding from misc sources including $10M BTR
from SDB I and SDB II. • Team: AAC & AFRL Lab partnership key to success
• AFRL led tech maturation effort w/transition to AAC• SDB program office supplemented for FLM effort • Partnered w/National Labs for composite design expertise
Enablers• Accelerated Funding• People & Teamwork • Leadership • Vision, Strategy, Focus• Accepting failure and taking risk• Mature Technologies• Clear and Valid Requirement• Agile support from testers
Recommended