Raoul Mulder, Jon Pearce, Mark Elgar

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Raoul Mulder, Jon Pearce, Mark Elgar. 2a.Review others’ work Choose assigned work Complete feedback form Submit. Assignment > Topic > Work > Review > Feedback. Students choose a topic for a written assignment. Others comment on their work and they in turn give feedback on the comments. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Raoul Mulder, Jon Pearce, Mark Elgar

Assignment > Topic > Work > Review > Feedback

1. Choose topic

Select assignment

Choose topic

Submit

2. Submit work

Choose file

Submit

3. Look at reviews

Select review

Complete feedback

Submit

4. Submit revision of report for assessment

2a. Review others’ work

Choose assigned work

Complete feedback formSubmit

Students choose a topic for a written assignment. Others comment on their work and they in turn give feedback on the comments.

Students choose a topic for a written assignment. Others comment on their work and they in turn give feedback on the comments.

Student’s View

[Peer review of teamwork]

Coordinator’s View

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Yuck ugly!

Yuck ugly!

Other modes of use

Assignment > Topic > Work > Review > Feedback

2a. Every three weeks team:

Completes feedback on each member’s performance

Submit

Students work in teams of 5. Each are required to regularly peer review the contribution of every other team member.

Students work in teams of 5. Each are required to regularly peer review the contribution of every other team member.

1. Choose topic

Select assignment

Choose topic

Submit

System forms teams

2. Team works...

3. At end of assignmentView aggregate of team’s assessment of your work

Assignment > Topic > Work > Review > Feedback

1. Students give presentation

2. Few days later...View feedback comments from others

1a. Students view presentation

1b. Submit review

Select assignment

Choose topic (oral presentation)

Submit

Complete review formSubmit

Students attend class presentations made by other students. Each is required to critically comment on the presentation.

Students attend class presentations made by other students. Each is required to critically comment on the presentation.

Current status

Sem 1 ‘07: Prototype (in ‘Neo’) used 4 subjects:

most functionality

some administrator functions not complete

Sem 2 ‘07: Improved version - ?? subjects:

complete missing admin functions

creating/administering groups

user interface & navigation

Sem 1 ‘08: Port to more open environment

Sakai?

27

Thoughts for forming groups

28

Conclusion