Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer€¦ · Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer in 2017...

Preview:

Citation preview

Radiotherapy in the Treatment

of Prostate CancerWhere are we now in 2017?

Melvin L.K. Chua, MBBS, FRCR, PhDClinician-Scientist, Consultant Radiation Oncologist

Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre

Instructor, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore

Principal Investigator, Translational Radiation Oncology Group

(NCCS)

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Disclosure

I am a Radiation Oncologist who believes in

Multidisciplinary Care for all men with Prostate

Cancer….

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Disclosure

I am a Radiation Oncologist who Believes in

Multidisciplinary Care for Men with Prostate

Cancer….

BUT I also get upset with every

Margin +ve GS 8-10 Prostate Cancer

with rising PSA who is referred

to my clinic

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Prostate Cancer: Prognostication

TNM stage Tumour grade PSA

Low

risk

Intermediate

risk

High

riskMetastatic

Localised cancers

Digital Rectal

Exam Imaging Biopsy Blood test

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Reese, et al. 2012. J Uro.

Low risk

Active Surveillance

Intermediate risk

Radiotherapy or

Surgery

High risk

Radiotherapy or

surgery + additional

treatment

Prostate Cancer: Prognostication

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Treatment of Prostate Cancer in 2017

Options

Active surveillance

Surgery (Radical prostatectomy, RadP – open vs

robotic)

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Treatment of Prostate Cancer in 2017

Options

Active surveillance

Surgery (Radical prostatectomy, RadP – open vs

robotic)

Radiotherapy

▪ Image guidance

▪ Brachytherapy

▪ Stereotactic radiosurgery

▪ Proton beam therapy

Radiotherapy + hormonal therapy

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Treatment of Prostate Cancer in 2017

Low cT1-T2a

PSA <10

GS ≤6

Intermediate cT2b-T2c

PSA 10-20

GS 7

HighcT3-4

PSA >20

GS 8-10

Active

surveillance

Favourable

RadP vs IGRTUnfavourable

IGRT + ADTRadP +/- IGRT

IGRT + ADT

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer in 2017

IGRT (image-guided RT)

▪ SBRT – 36.25 Gy/5#

▪ Mod hypofract – 60 Gy (3 Gy/#)

▪ Conv fract – 74-78 Gy (2 Gy/#)

Brachy – LDR (seeds) vs HDR

mono

Low cT1-T2a

PSA <10

GS ≤6

Intermediate cT2b-T2c

PSA 10-20

GS 7

HighcT3-4

PSA >20

GS 8-10

Active

surveillance

Favourable

RadP vs IGRTUnfavourable

IGRT + ADT

RadP +/- IGRT

IGRT + LTAD

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer in 2017

Low cT1-T2a

PSA <10

GS ≤6

Intermediate cT2b-T2c

PSA 10-20

GS 7

HighcT3-4

PSA >20

GS 8-10

Active

surveillance

IGRT (image-guided RT)

▪ SBRT – 37-40 Gy/5#

▪ Conv fract – 74-78 Gy (2

Gy/#) over mod hypofract

▪ RT to Pelvis???

Brachy – HDR boost

IGRT (image-guided RT)

▪ SBRT – 36.25 Gy/5#

▪ Mod hypofract – 60 Gy

(3 Gy/#)

▪ Conv fract – 74-78 Gy

(2 Gy/#)

Brachy – LDR (seeds) vs

HDR mono

Favourable

RadP vs IGRTUnfavourable

IGRT + ADTRadP +/- IGRT

IGRT + LTAD

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer in 2017

Low cT1-T2a

PSA <10

GS ≤6

Intermediate cT2b-T2c

PSA 10-20

GS 7

HighcT3-4

PSA >20

GS 8-10

Active

surveillance

IGRT (image-guided RT)

▪ SBRT – 37-40 Gy/5#

▪ Conv fract – 74-78 Gy

(2 Gy/#) over mod

hypofract

▪ RT to Pelvis???

Brachy – HDR boost

IGRT (image-guided RT)

▪ SBRT – 36.25 Gy/5#

▪ Mod hypofract – 60 Gy

(3 Gy/#)

▪ Conv fract – 74-78 Gy

(2 Gy/#)

Brachy – LDR (seeds) vs

HDR mono

Favourable

RadP vs IGRTUnfavourable

IGRT + ADTRadP +/- IGRT

IGRT + LTAD

IGRT (image-guided

RT)

▪ SBRT – 37-40

Gy/5#

▪ Conv fract – 74-78

Gy (2 Gy/#) + 50-

54 Gy to Pelvis

Brachy – HDR boost

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

1st LEVEL 1 evidence comparing local

tx in localised prostate cancers

UK-wide clinical trial of 1,500 men,

reported 2016ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

PROTECT cohort

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

PROTECT cohortMajority favourable-risk patients

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Outcomes: low-risk and favourable

intermediate-risk prostate cancers

Hamdry et al. on behalf of PROTECT

investigators, NEJM, 2016

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

PROTECT: QOL post-RT

Incontinence

Erectile function

Leakage (Pads usage)

Sexual satisfaction

Donovan et al., NEJM, 2016

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

NC prospective: QOL post-RT

Chen, et al., ASTRO 2017

North Carolina Prospective Observational cohort

N = 1225; 2011-2013

PROTECT

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

NC prospective: QOL post-RT

Chen, et al., ASTRO 2017

▪ Contemporary data

▪ Consistent with PROTECT

▪ Highlights need for such high

quality data

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Radiotherapy10 years of Technological Precision

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer in 2017

Low cT1-T2a

PSA <10

GS ≤6

Intermediate cT2b-T2c

PSA 10-20

GS 7

HighcT3-4

PSA >20

GS 8-10

Active

surveillance

IGRT (image-guided

RT)

▪ SBRT – 37-40 Gy/5#

▪ Conv fract – 74-78 Gy

(2 Gy/#) over mod

hypofract

▪ RT to Pelvis???

Brachy – HDR boost

IGRT (image-guided RT)

▪ SBRT – 36.25 Gy/5#

▪ Mod hypofract – 60 Gy

(3 Gy/#)

▪ Conv fract – 74-78 Gy

(2 Gy/#)

Brachy – LDR (seeds) vs

HDR mono

Favourable

RadP vs IGRTUnfavourable

IGRT + ADTRadP +/- IGRT

IGRT + LTAD

IGRT (image-guided

RT)

▪ SBRT – 37-40

Gy/5#

▪ Conv fract – 74-78

Gy (2 Gy/#) + 50-

54 Gy to Pelvis

Brachy – HDR boost

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer in 2017

Low cT1-T2a

PSA <10

GS ≤6

Intermediate cT2b-T2c

PSA 10-20

GS 7

HighcT3-4

PSA >20

GS 8-10

Active

surveillance

IGRT (image-guided

RT)

▪ SBRT – 37-40 Gy/5#

▪ Conv fract – 74-78 Gy

(2 Gy/#) over mod

hypofract

▪ RT to Pelvis???

Brachy – HDR boost

IGRT (image-guided RT)

▪ SBRT – 36.25 Gy/5#

▪ Mod hypofract – 60 Gy

(3 Gy/#)

▪ Conv fract – 74-78 Gy

(2 Gy/#)

Brachy – LDR (seeds) vs

HDR mono

Favourable

RadP vs IGRTUnfavourable

IGRT + ADTRadP +/- IGRT

IGRT + LTAD

IGRT (image-guided

RT)

▪ SBRT – 37-40

Gy/5#

▪ Conv fract – 74-78

Gy (2 Gy/#) + 50-

54 Gy to Pelvis

Brachy – HDR boost

What is the optimal

dose??

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Hypofractionation in Prostate Cancer:

Tipping the Therapeutic Ratio Balance

Biological Effective Dose

BED = Total Dose(1+ dose per #/α/β) ▪ Assumption: α/β = 1.5 Gy for tumour & 3.0 Gy for normal

tissue

SBRT - 36.25 Gy/5#

EQD2tumour = 90.6 Gy

EQD2normal = 74 Gy

Conv fract

74-78 Gy/37-39# vs

Mod Hypofract - 60 Gy/20#

EQD2tumour = 77 Gy

EQD2normal = 72 Gy

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Contemporary moderate hypofractionation RCTs

N = 6339CHHIP (UK) RTOG 0415 (US)

PROFIT (Canada/EU) HYPRO (Dutch)

N = 3216

N = 1206

N = 1115

N = 820

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Contemporary moderate hypofractionation RCTs

N = 6339CHHIP (UK) RTOG 0415 (US)

PROFIT (Canada/EU) HYPRO (Dutch)

N = 3216

N = 1206

N = 1115

N = 820

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Are all intermediate-risk prostate cancers the

same???

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Dose escalation in the unfavourable risk group?

Evidence for a dose response for PSA control

Zelefsky et al J Urol 2006

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Randomised trials of dose escalation

with Conventional Hyperfractionation

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Randomised trials of dose escalation

with Conventional Hyperfractionation

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Radiotherapy treatment protocol

NCCS GU Radiation Oncology Program

Low-risk

Active surveillance

Offer SBRT trial – PROSTAR

Intermediate-risk

Favourable – 60 Gy in 30# or PROSTAR

Unfavourable – 74-78 Gy in 39# +/- 6-mo ADT (STAD)

High-risk

74-78 Gy in 39# + 3-y ADT (LTAD) +/- 1-2 y combination Zytiga??

46 Gy + HDR boost (15 Gy) + 1 to 3-y ADT (LTAD)

ASCENDE-RT

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

NCCS GU RT Outcomes

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Overall survival Biochemical control

(2006-2010)

10-y follow-up

Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)

▪ Precise and focused delivery of small number of

fractions of radiation in the ablative dose range to

extracranial targets

Stage I/II NSCLC

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

N = 67

MFU = 2.7y

36.25Gy in 5 fractions

over 1.5 weeks

Early data with Prostate SBRT

King, et al, IJORBP, 2012

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

N = 1100

“Comparable” outcomes with DE-EBRT

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

N = 304 (median fu = 5 y)

▪ Low risk 69.4%

▪ Int risk 26.6%

▪ High risk 0.7%

“Comparable” late toxicities with DE-EBRT

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

PROSTAR (PROstate STereotactic

Ablative Radiotherapy) NCCS prospective phase II trial

• Single institution; Single-arm

• NCCN Low-risk or single intermediate risk factor (DRE T2b-c

or Gleason 7 or PSA 10-20); organ-confined prostate

adenocarcinoma, with no MRI evidence of ECE and SV invasion

• 36.25Gy in 5 fractions over 1.5 weeks (EOD) delivered using

LINAC-based treatment system

• No hormonal therapy

• Primary end-point - severe late GI and GU toxicities

• Secondary end-points – Patient-reported QOL, acute RT

toxicities, biochemical relapse, prostate cancer specific mortality,

overall survival

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

PROSTAR: Early results

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Summary

Low cT1-T2a

PSA <10

GS ≤6

Intermediate cT2b-T2c

PSA 10-20

GS 7

HighcT3-4

PSA >20

GS 8-10

Active

surveillance

IGRT (image-guided

RT)

▪ SBRT – 37-40 Gy/5#

▪ Conv fract – 74-78 Gy

(2 Gy/#) over mod

hypofract

Brachy – HDR boost

IGRT (image-guided RT)

▪ SBRT – 36.25 Gy/5#

▪ Mod hypofract – 60 Gy

(3 Gy/#)

▪ Conv fract – 74-78 Gy

(2 Gy/#)

Brachy – LDR (seeds) vs

HDR mono

Favourable

RadP vs IGRTUnfavourable

IGRT + ADTRadP +/- IGRT

IGRT + LTAD

IGRT (image-guided

RT)

▪ SBRT – 37-40

Gy/5#

▪ Conv fract – 74-78

Gy (2 Gy/#) + 50-

54 Gy to Pelvis

Brachy – HDR boost

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

ASCENDE-RT Ph III trial

Control arm

46 Gy EBRT to Pelvis

+ 32 Gy to Prostate

+ 12-mo ADT

Experimental arm

46 Gy EBRT to Pelvis

+ LDR 110 Gy to Prostate

+ 12-mo ADT

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

ASCENDE-RT Ph III trial

Intermediate-risk

High-risk

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Contemporary data with HDR boost

UK MVCC Ph III (Hoskin et al., 2012)

Int-high-risk Prostate Cancers

55 Gy/20# vs

37.5 Gy/15# + 8.5 Gy x 2 HDR

Beaumont (Martinez et al., 2011)

Int-high-risk Prostate Cancers

46 Gy/23# to Pelvis ->

<8.5 Gy x 2 HDR vs >9 Gy x 2 HDR

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Is HDR boost the best form of DE in GS 9-

10 high-grade disease??UCLA (Kishan et al., Eur Urol, 2016)

High-risk GS 9-10 Prostate Cancers

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

GS 9-10 consortium

Kishan et al., ASTRO, 2017

Distant Mets

PCSM

12y

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Final Points

Low-risk and Favourable Int-riskActive surveillance

Treatment: 60 Gy/20# (Mod hypofract), 36.25 Gy/5# (SBRT)

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Final Points

Low-risk and Favourable Int-riskActive surveillance

Treatment: 60 Gy/20# (Mod hypofract), 36.25 Gy/5# (SBRT)

Unfavourable Int-riskProstate alone or Pelvis EBRT 74-78 Gy/39# +/- 6-mo ADT

Trial: Pelvis EBRT + HDR boost: 46-50 Gy/23-25# + HDR 15 Gy

Trial: Prostate EBRT + HDR boost: 37.5 Gy/15# + HDR 15 Gy

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Final Points

Low-risk and Favourable Int-riskActive surveillance

Treatment: 60 Gy/20# (Mod hypofract), 36.25 Gy/5# (SBRT)

Unfavourable Int-riskProstate alone or Pelvis EBRT 74-78 Gy/39# +/- 6-mo ADT

Trial: Pelvis EBRT + HDR boost: 46-50 Gy/23-25# + HDR 15 Gy

Trial: Prostate EBRT + HDR boost: 37.5 Gy/15# + HDR 15 Gy

High-riskProstate alone or Pelvis EBRT 74-78 Gy/39# + 3-y ADT

Trial: Pelvis EBRT + HDR boost: 46-50 Gy/23-25# + HDR 15 Gy

+ 1-3-y ADT

Systemic disease remains poorly addressed

ESMO GU Preceptorship, 15 November 2017

Thank you!

Questions

Recommended