View
218
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
National Analytical Management Program (NAMP)
U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office
In Cooperation with our University Partners
Radiochemistry Webinars Environmental/Bioassay Radiochemistry Series
Unconventional Drilling/Hydraulic Fracturing and
Natural Radioactivity
Meet the Presenters… Michael K. Schultz, PhD
Dr. Schultz is an Associate Professor in the Department of Radiology at the University of Iowa, with secondary appointments in the Free Radical and Radiation Biology; Human Toxicology; and Medical Scientist Training Programs. Dr Schultz also co-directs the Radiochemistry Program in the Department of Chemistry. His research interests in environmental radioactivity focus on naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) associated with liquid and solid waste resulting from unconventional drilling and hydraulic fracturing. This year, Dr. Schultz has been invited to speak on this topic at the American Chemical Society National Meeting, the National Environmental Monitoring Conference, and ASTM International. A recent article (Nelson et al., Env Sci Techn Let, March 11, 2014) was selected for an ACS Editor’s Choice Award and the article, first authored by PhD graduate student and Presidential Fellow Andrew Nelson, is featured on the cover of the journal. Funded by the University of Iowa’s Center for Health Effects of Environmental Contaminants, Dr. Schultz's laboratory (with collaborator Tori Forbes, Department of Chemistry) has begun field studies on the environmental geochemical behavior of NORM in natural surface water systems impacted by unconventional drilling and hydraulic fracturing operations and waste treatment facilities. Mike earned his PhD in Oceanography at Florida State University, studying the environmental radiochemistry of anthropogenic and natural radionuclides in terrestrial and aquatic systems.
2
Andy Nelson, MS Andy Nelson earned a B.A. in biochemistry from the University of Colorado in 2009 and an M.S. in environmental engineering from the Colorado School of Mines in 2010. As a research assistant in the Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology (MCDB) at the University of Colorado, Mr. Nelson studied free radical signaling mechanisms relevant in aging and tumor progression. In 2012, Andy was awarded the University of Iowa Presidential Graduate Fellowship to pursue a PhD in the Interdisciplinary Human Toxicology Program. He is currently a doctoral candidate under the mentorship of Dr. Schultz, with whom he studies radioactivity associated with unconventional drilling (hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling) of shale gas. Much of Mr. Nelson’s work to date has focused on developing methods that are suitable for monitoring levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) present in wastes generated by unconventional natural gas exploration. Andy’s research has helped develop partitioning models that will be used in the development of sound waste management strategies for solid and liquid wastes generated by unconventional drilling.
Radioactivity and Unconventional
Drilling Michael K. Schultz, PhD Andrew W. Nelson, MS
National Analytical Management Program (NAMP)
U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office
TRAINING AND EDUCATION SUBCOMMITTEE
Disclaimer
Certain products and manufacturers are mentioned during this presentation for the purpose of fostering understanding.
Reference to these commercial products and manufacturers in this presentation does not constitute recommendation or endorsement of the products.
4
Outline
• Background on “fracking”? – Why, Where, What and How
• Source of radioactivity
• Geochemical considerations
• Methods to detect NORM in flowback
• Considerations for: – Liquid waste – Solid waste
• Future research needs
6
5 Major Stages of Hydraulic Fracturing
12
http://www2.epa.gov/hfstudy/hydraulic-fracturing-water-cycle
Stage 1: Water Acquisition
• Water Usage – Up to 55,000 m3 (15 million
gallons) per well
• Concern – Straining water resources
• Arid states concerned • Growing concern elsewhere
– Unknown contribution to radioactivity • Recycling fluids?
13
Stage 2: Chemical Mixing
14
• Caustics and toxics –Hydrochloric acid –Proprietary chemicals –Antimicrobials –Unknown interactions with NORM
• Sand –Crystalline silica –OSHA hazard alert –Mined in IA, WI
https://www.osha.gov/dts/hazardalerts/hydraulic_frac_hazard_alert.html
Radioactive Solid Waste 16
• Bit Cuttings
– 250,000 kg/well
– Trucks turned away from landfills
– Radiation alarms set off
https://www.rigzone.com/training/insight.asp?insight_id=294&c_id=24
http://www.post-gazette.com/local/marcellusshale/2013/08/22/Marcellus-Shale-waste-trips-more-radioactivity-alarms-than-other-products-left-at-landfills/stories/201308220367
Stage 4: Flowback/Produced Water 17
Thousands of cubic meters (millions of gallons) produced fluids per well
Radioactive Produced Fluids
18
• Documented High Levels of Ra
> 670 Bq/L 226Ra
(18,000 pCi/L)
> 95 Bq/L 228Ra
(2,500 pCi/L)
Stage 5: Disposal/Treatment of Waste 19
• Solids (250000 kg/well) – Municipal landfills • Radiation alarms
– Hazardous waste landfills
• Fluids – POTWs – Industrial treatment
facilities – Deep surface injection – Recycling – Transportation
considerations • Trucking • Barges?
Where does the radioactivity come from?
20
1. Radioactive Tracers – Most common are gamma emitters • 46Sc, 140La, 56Mn, 24Na, 124Sb, 192Ir, 99Tcm, 131I, 110Agm, 41Ar, 133Xe
– Measure flow rates & inter well connections – Short half-lives (hours to days)
2. Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials – Present in the formation • 238U (uranium) series • 232Th (thorium) series • 235U (actinium) series
– Long half-lives, decay products, differing chemistries
http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1171_web.pdf
Marine Black Shales
21
http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0356c/report.pdf
http://written-in-stone-seen-through-my-lens.blogspot.com/2011/01/lace-crab.html
• Ancient marine environments
• High organic matter
• High associated U levels
General Shale Geochemical Characteristics 22
• Reducing environment (anoxic)
• Microbial sulfate reduction
– Low sulfate concentrations
• High salt
– Evaporite
– Unclear where all the salt from Marcellus originates
General Chemistry of Uranium Series
23
http://metadata.berkeley.edu/nuclear-forensics/Decay%20Chains.html
• U redox sensitive (+6 soluble, +4 immobile)
• Pa particle reactive
• Th particle reactive
• Ra soluble in low-sulfate (SO42-) brine
• Rn short-lived gas
• Po isotopes short-lived, redox sensitive, particle reactive
• Bi isotopes short-lived, supported by Pb isotopes
• Pb isotopes short-lived (exception 210Pb, which can accumulate in brine)
Case Study — Marcellus Shale
• One of the largest natural gas plays in the U.S.
• Underlies multiple states
• Regulation differs state to state
– NY “fracking’ moratorium
– OH, WV, PA allow
24
http://www.marcellus.psu.edu/
http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=14091
NORM in the Marcellus Shale
25
http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=14091
• Marine Black Shale
• Devonian Age
– 350-400 million yrs old
• Radioactive decay products assumed in secular equilibrium
Matrix
27
Ba:Ra ≈ 109
Analyte Concentration (mg/L)
Chloride 146,667
Strontium 36,333
Sodium 29,333
Calcium 13,000
Barium 9,000
Magnesium 853
Manganese 3
Iron 43
Total Solids 277,666
Suspended Solids 783
Scheme for Analysis
Gamma Emitters: 228Ac, 226Ra, 224Ra, Pb and Bi isotopes, 235U, 208Tl, 234Th
Special Case:
226Ra, 222Rn
Alpha Emitters (excluding Ra): Po Isotopes, U isotopes, 228Th, 230Th, 232Th
28
Liquid Scintillation
Alpha Spec
HPGe Gamma Spec
Rad7
Analysis of Alpha Emitters
30
• Isotope dilution alpha spectrometry
– U
– Th
– Po
• Wet chemistry effective
– Pre-concentrations (ex: MnO2, FeOH3)
– Chromatography (ex: Eichrom® Resins)
– Microprecipitations (ex: CeOH3)
Simplifying the Matrix (MnO2)
31
0.25 – 1L FBW
Precipitate Chromatography
Complex
Digest Wash/Dissolve
Add Tracers Add KMnO4
Method Summary
• Polonium Recoveries (81 ± 9 %)
Autodeposition slow
Considered alternatives
• Uranium Recoveries (63 ± 8 %)
• Thorium – Recoveries (85 ± 9 %)
32
Ingrowth of 210Pb and 210Po in Flowback
33
*H. Bateman, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 1910 (15) 423-427
36
Partitioning Model
Th-234
U-238
Daughter recoil
U(IV)-234
Th-230 Ac-228 Th-228
Ra-224
Daughter recoil Insoluble
Thorium Series
Uranium Series
Brine
Rock
Rock
Th-232
Pb-210
Fissure
U-234
Ra-226
Rn-222
Rn-222
Po-210 ?
Ra-228
Th-234
U-238
Daughter recoil
U(IV)-234
Th-230
Ra-226
Ac-228 Th-228
Ra-224
Daughter recoil Insoluble
Thorium Series
Uranium Series
Brine
Rock
Rock
Th-232
Pb-210
Fissure
Rn-222
Po-210
Rn-222
U-234
Ra-228
The Big Picture 37
Special Considerations for Liquid Waste
• Enriched in Ra isotopes – Can lead to Ra contamination
• Rn generators – Inhalation hazards?
• Ra decay products ingrowth unavoidable
• Ra decay products have different chemistry – Ra treatments (ex: sulfate
precipitations) • May not remove decay products • 210Pb, 210Po, and 228Th of concern • Difficult to detect
40
41
Liquid Waste in Marcellus Region
• Industrial Treatment
– Occurs in PA, WV, OH
– Ra decay products
– Occupational exposure?
– Surface Water Contamination?
• Underground Injection & Recycling Flowback
– Ra decay products
– Occupation exposure?
– Unclear fate of NORM after injection
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wrcr.20096/pdf
Special Considerations with Solid Waste
• Bit cuttings coming from reduced environment to oxidizing surface –Increase mobility of select
radionuclides • U4+
U6+ • Po speciation? • Fe and Mn adsorptive surfaces may
change
• 234U, 210Po, 232Th, 230Th, 228Th not detected by gamma-ray meters –Note: 234U enriched by
alpha-recoil, thus cannot assume 1:1 234U:238U activity
42
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/jun/27/water-shortages-threaten-renewable-energy
• Billions of kgs bit cuttings
• Interstate transfer
• Most bit cuttings go to landfills
• Emerging reports of radioactivity alarms at landfills
– Unclear which isotopes
– Unclear what level of alpha emissions
• Concerns of radioactivity leaching
Solid Waste in Marcellus Region
43
http://www.triplepundit.com/2014/04/west-virginia-landfill-wastewater-shows-elevated-radioactivity-due-fracking-authorities-report/
Future Research Needs
On-going studies in the Schultz and Forbes Labs:
Other important questions:
• Bench studies on the behavior of NORM in bit cuttings from Marcellus Shale
• Field studies on the environmental fate and equilibrium status of Ra decay products
• What levels of 222Rn are released from landfills and wastewater treatment facilities accepting unconventional drilling waste?
• What is the potential/extent of bioaccumulation of NORM from unconventional drilling waste?
Thank you! Questions? • State Hygienic Laboratory at UIowa
– Dr. Michael Wichman – Marinea Mehrhoff – Dustin May
• Schultz and Forbes Labs (UIowa) – Dr. Michael K Schultz – Dr. Tori Z Forbes – Eric Eitrheim – Andrew Knight
• EMS – Robert Shannon – Dr. Robert Litman
45
Upcoming NAMP Radiochemistry
Webinars
• Introduction to the Fuel Cycle – June 26, 2014
• Front End: Uranium Mining, Milling, Enrichment and UO2 Production – July 24, 2014
• Environmental and human contamination in the Front End of the Fuel Cycle for Uranium Mining and Milling – August 21, 2014
Visit the NAMP website at www.wipp.energy.gov/namp
Recommended