Race Inequality in Education · 2018-01-29 · Thinking & Talking about . RACE. it is almost...

Preview:

Citation preview

Race Inequality in Education

David GillbornCentre for Research in Race & Education (CRRE)

www.birmingham.ac.uk/crrehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Gillborn

• ‘Race’ & Racism

• Racism in Educationo White people as race victims

o The Black/White achievement gap

Thinking & Talking about RACE

a matter of perspective

Thinking & Talking about RACE

it is almost universally agreed that race is a social construct. In 2005, only two years after the sequencing of the human genome, the editors of Nature Biotechnology put it like this: ‘Pooling people in race silos is akin to zoologists grouping raccoons, tigers, and okapis on the basis that they are all stripey.’ Perhaps, then, the better question is: Why do we continue to search for a connection between race and genetics

Silverstein, J. 2015. Genes Don't Cause Racial-Health Disparities, Society Does. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/04/genes-dont-cause-racial-health-disparities-society-does/389637/

Racism

Traditional view of racism

An exceptional occurrence driven by crude race hatred.

Racism

Traditional view of racism

An exceptional occurrence driven by crude race hatred.

Critical understanding of racism

Complex, subtle and extensive.Racist acts can be well-intentioned.

Racism in Education

78.175.7

6461.2 60.5

55.5 54.9 53.3

17.513.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Chinese Indian Bangladeshi Black AfricanWhite British Pakistani Mixed Race:White/Bl.

Carib.

BlackCaribbean

TravellerIrish

Heritage

Gypsy/Roma

Source: Department for Education. 5+ higher grade GCSEs incl. Eng. & maths, 2013, by ethnic origin, state maintained schools, England.

Creating White ‘Victims’Percentage 5+ (A* - C) GCSEs inc. English & maths

all students in state schools

76.8

61.559.2

51.4

32.3

46.8

37.5

42.2

12.99.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Chinese Indian Bangladeshi Black AfricanWhite British Pakistani Mixed Race:White/Bl.

Carib.

BlackCaribbean

TravellerIrish

Heritage

Gypsy/Roma

Creating White ‘Victims’Percentage 5+ (A* - C) GCSEs inc. English & maths

free school meals only

Source: Department for Education. 5+ higher grade GCSEs incl. Eng. & maths, 2013, by ethnic origin, state maintained schools, England.

76.8

61.559.2

51.4

32.3

46.8

37.5

42.2

12.99.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Chinese Indian Bangladeshi Black AfricanWhite British Pakistani Mixed Race:White/Bl.

Carib.

BlackCaribbean

TravellerIrish

Heritage

Gypsy/Roma

Creating White ‘Victims’Percentage 5+ (A* - C) GCSEs inc. English & maths

free school meals only

Source: Department for Education. 5+ higher grade GCSEs incl. Eng. & maths, 2013, by ethnic origin, state maintained schools, England.

WorkingClass

‘working class’

FSM

Self-identify as ‘working class’

Creating White ‘Victims’

WorkingClass

Self-identify as ‘working class’ Free School Meal eligible

‘working class’

FSM

Creating White ‘Victims’

Prioritize White Children

‘Why is it that white kids are doing so much worse?We have to tackle that as a society.For the future of Britain it obviously matters more to tackle white underperformance just because there are more white people.

You cannot have your dominant racial group doing badly in school and expect to flourish as a country in the next generation and beyond.That just won’t hold so we need to tackle that one really explicitly.

Source for Quotation: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10375879/White-

boys-the-problem-for-Britains-schools-says-Government-aide.html

Dr Tim Leunig, Associate Professor in Economic History, London School of Economics (2013), Chief Analyst and Senior Ministerial Policy Adviser at the

Department for Education (2014-2017)

The Centre for Research in Race and Education (CRRE) drew our attention to a mismatch between the proportion of children who were eligible for free school meals and the proportion of adults who would self-define as working class … The logical result of equating FSM with working class was that 85% of children were being characterised as middle class or above (p. 8, emphasis added)

The Centre for Research in Race and Education (CRRE) drew our attention to a mismatch between the proportion of children who were eligible for free school meals and the proportion of adults who would self-define as working class … The logical result of equating FSM with working class was that 85% of children were being characterised as middle class or above (p. 8, emphasis added)

Nevertheless, free school meals data is readily available, has the advantage of being easy to conceptualise, and has been consistently collected for many years … Pragmatism has led us to pursue analyses of free school meals data as an insight into the issue that Ofsted and others have raised.(p. 10, emphasis added)

The Centre for Research in Race and Education (CRRE) drew our attention to a mismatch between the proportion of children who were eligible for free school meals and the proportion of adults who would self-define as working class … The logical result of equating FSM with working class was that 85% of children were being characterised as middle class or above (p. 8)

Nevertheless, free school meals data is readily available, has the advantage of being easy to conceptualise, and has been consistently collected for many years … Pragmatism has led us to pursue analyses of free school meals data as an insight into the issue that Ofsted and others have raised.(p. 10)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Sources: all official data: 1988 to 2003 SFR 04/2005; 2004 DfES (2006) p. 41; 2005 DfES (2006) p. 42; 2006 SFR 46/2006; 2007 SFR 38/2007; 2008 to 20012 SFR 04/2013.

perc

enta

ge

Research funded by the Society for Educational Studies National Research Award 2013

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

The Black/White Achievement Gap: 1988 - 200588-05: 5+ A*-C GCSEs

perc

enta

ge

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

The Black/White Achievement Gap: 1988 - 200588-05: 5+ A*-C GCSEs

perc

enta

ge

1993: White odds of success 2.84

1999: White odds of success 1.56

Odds ratio: the odds of a White student achieving the benchmark relative to the chance of a Black Caribbean student achieving benchmark

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

The Black/White Achievement Gap: 1988 - 200688-05: 5+ A*-C GCSEs2006: 5+ A*-C inc Eng & maths

Odds ratio: the odds of a White student achieving the benchmark relative to the chance of a Black Caribbean student achieving benchmark

1993: White odds of success 2.84

1999: White odds of success 1.56

2006 ‘Gold Standard’

2006: White odds1.92

perc

enta

ge

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

The Black/White Achievement Gap: 1988 - 201088-05: 5+ A*-C GCSEs06-10: 5+ A*-C inc Eng & maths

Odds ratio: the odds of a White student achieving the benchmark relative to the chance of a Black Caribbean student achieving benchmark

2006 ‘Gold Standard’

2006: White odds1.92

1999: White odds of success 1.56

1993: White odds of success 2.84

2010: White odds1.58

perc

enta

ge

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

The Black/White Achievement Gap: 1988 - 201188-05: 5+ A*-C GCSEs06-10: 5+ A*-C inc Eng & maths2011: English Baccalaureate

2006 ‘Gold Standard’

1993: White odds of success 2.84

1999: White odds of success 1.56

2006: White odds1.92

2010: White odds1.58

2011: White odds2.2

2011 E. Bacc.

Odds ratio: the odds of a White student achieving the benchmark relative to the chance of a Black Caribbean student achieving benchmark

perc

enta

ge

1988 : White odds of success 1.95

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

The Black/White Achievement Gap: 1988 - 201388-05: 5+ A*-C GCSEs06-10: 5+ A*-C inc Eng & maths11-13: English Baccalaureate

2006 ‘Gold Standard’

Worst gap : (1993)White odds of success 2.84

‘Best’ gap: (1999) White odds of success 1.56

2011 E. Bacc.

Odds ratio: the odds of a White student achieving the benchmark relative to the chance of a Black Caribbean student achieving benchmark

1988 : White odds of success 1.95 2013 :

White odds of success 1.73

perc

enta

ge

2006: White odds1.92

2010: White odds1.58

Critical understanding of racism

Complex, subtle and extensive.Racist acts can be well-intentioned.

Colourblind approaches are no defence.

Race Inequality in Education

David GillbornCentre for Research in Race & Education (CRRE)

www.birmingham.ac.uk/crrehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Gillborn

more ideas and resources …..

Racism and Education: coincidence or conspiracy?

David Gillborn (2008)

The Colour of Class: the educational

Strategies ofthe Black middle classes

Nicola Rollock, David Gillborn, Carol Vincent & Stephen J. Ball (2015)

www.birmingham.ac.uk/crre

Claim to care –while ignoring or

denying racist inequity

Present White people as ‘victims’

Blame anti-racism for

White victimization

Silence critical discussion of

racism

Systemic racist

inequity

the monsterizationof race equality

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

The Black/White Achievement Gap: 1988 - 201388-05: 5+ A*-C GCSEs06-10: 5+ A*-C inc Eng & maths11-13: English Baccalaureate

2006 ‘Gold Standard’

Worst gap : (1993)White odds of success 2.84

‘Best’ gap: (1999) White odds of success 1.56

2011 E. Bacc.

Odds ratio: the odds of a White student achieving the benchmark relative to the chance of a Black Caribbean student achieving benchmark

1988 : White odds of success 1.95 2013 :

White odds of success 1.73

perc

enta

ge

2006: White odds1.92

2010: White odds1.58

Recommended