View
13
Download
1
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
“Deterministic quantum teleportation with feed-forward in a solid state system”Steffen, Lars, et al. Nature 500.7462 (2013): 319-322.
Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank
03.04.2017
Quantum Teleportation
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
Introduction and Repetition• Why quantum teleportation
• Algorithm and Gates
Implementation of the Circuit
Results and Discussion
03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 2
Outline
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 3
Why quantum teleportation?
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 4
Theory of Quantum Teleportation
sender
mediator
receiver
Transmission of
classical information
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 5
Implementation
sender
mediator
receiver
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 6
Multy-Qubit Cavity Bus (Transmission line)
Qubits coupled to/via oszillator• Similar to Cavidy-QED
• Large dipol, low dissipation
Strong coupling limit
Transition frequencies tunable through flux in qubit loop
Determine setup parameters through vacuum-Rabi-oszillations
Majer, J., et al. "Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus." Nature 449.7161 (2007): 443-447.
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
Qubit-Qubit interaction through virtual photons
No direct interactions with the cavity
Quantum Non-Demolition (QND) Measurement of individual and joint qubit states
03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 7
Two-Qubit Cavity Bus
Majer, J., et al. "Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus." Nature 449.7161 (2007): 443-447.
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 8
Implementation of the Circuit
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
Implementation through the avoided crossing
03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 9
CPHASE-Gate
DiCarlo, L., et al. "Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor." Nature 460.7252 (2009): 240-244.
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
Ideal protocol:• Entangled pair between A and B
• Two-qubit measurement to identify all four Bell states
• Feed-forward of the classical information
Problem: space-like realization between sender and receiver
03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 10
Protocol
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
Post-selected teleportation
Deterministic teleportation
Deterministic teleportation with feed-forward
03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 11
Applied Methods
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 12
Implementation
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
Only need to distinguish one of the four Bell states
Through Josephson parametric amplifier measure whether Q1 is e.g. 00 (nooperations needed)
2nd Josephson parametric amplifier to read out Q3
To get process matrix χ00 four linearly indep input states will be used
(full process tomography)
03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 14
Post-Selected teleportation protocol
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
Relation between process and output-state fidelity:•
d… dimensionality of states
Any Bell-state can be put into computational basis by applying π pulses toQ1 or Q2
03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 16
Fidelities
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 17
Results and Discussion
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
Direction of view for image a
Extended Data Figure 2 | Characterization of the joint readout of Q1 and Q2
Deterministic readout
03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 17
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
Extended Data Figure 1 | Pulse sequence of the teleportation protocol with feed-forward
Feedforward: ~500 ns !!!
Deterministic readout with feed-forward
03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 18
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 20
Postselection process matrix
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 21
Deterministic readout process matrix
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 22
Deterministic readout with feed-forward process matrix
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 23
Post-selection
Deterministic readout
Deterministic readout
With feed-forward
Process matrices
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
Extended Data Table 1
Success probabilities for the joint readout
Extended Data Table 2
Process fidelities of the feed-forward pulses
Error sources
03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 23
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
March 2014
Psi- created with F = 87 %
f = 1/250 s⁻¹
Average state fidelity
F = (77 ± 3) %
Readout fidelity
F = (96,3 ± 0,5) %
03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 25
Comparision to quantum teleportation in NV-centers
May 2013
Phi created with F = 92 %
f = 10⁴ s⁻¹
Average state fidelity
F = (68,8 ± 0,5) %
Readout fidelity
F = (89,1 ± 0,5) %
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation 03.04.2017Christoph Dlapa, Martin Stadler, Martin Woschank 26
Thank you for your attention!
||Quantum Information Processing II Implementations: Quantum Teleportation
Extended Data Figure 3 | Characterization of the output states
Recommended