Quality Registers in Finland The Importance to Measure ... · Total fertility rate by the age at...

Preview:

Citation preview

28.1.2019 1

Quality Registers in Finland – The Importance to Measure Fertility Treatments

Mika Gissler, THL

National, mandatory data collections on reproductive health maintained by THL

▪ Register on Congenital Malformations since 1963

▪ Register on induced abortions and sterilisations since 1983 (statistics since 1950/1939)

▪ Medical Birth Register since 1987

– More detailed data on very premature children since 2005 (< 1501 grams or < 32 gestational weeks)

▪ Statistics on IVF/IUI since 1992/2005

▪ Drug and pregnancy –research database on use of medication during pregnancy and its consequences since 1996

28/01/2019 2

National, mandatory registers on reproductive health maintained by THL

▪ Information on hospital care related to reproduction is available in the Hospital Discharge Register

– Hospital inpatient care since 1967

– Hospital day surgery since 1994

– Social institutions since 1995

– Hospital outpatient visits since 1998

– Primary health care visits since 2011

28/01/2019 3

Total fertility rate decreases in Finland

28.1.2019 4

Total fertility rate in the Nordic countries

28.1.2019 5

Fertility rate per 1000 women by age

28.1.2019 6

The mean age of parturients, years

28.1.2019 7

The number of ART treatments

28.1.2019 8

The number of ART treatmentsper 1000 women aged 15-49 years

28.1.2019 9

Total fertility rate by the age at first birth

Roustaei Z, Räisänen S, Gissler M, Heinonen S: Fertility rates and the postponement of first births: a descriptive study with Finnish population data. BMJ Open 2018.

28.1.2019 10

The number of ART treatmentsper 1000 women aged 15-49 years, 2015

28.1.2019 11

The proportion of IVF+ICSI and FET, 2015

28.1.2019 12

The number of donations

28.1.2019 13

Started treatments by age

28.1.2019 14

The number of newborns born after ART

28.1.2019 15

The number of newborns and the effect of ART

28.1.2019 16

How to measure quality in ART?

28.1.2019 17

The mean number of transferred embryos

28.1.2019 18

The proportion of single embryo transfers

28.1.2019 19

The number of multiple deliveries after ART

28.1.2019 20

The proportion of multiple deliveries after ART, %

28.1.2019 21

The proportion of treatments ending to a live birth

28.1.2019 22

Success rates by the number of transferred embryos in 2016

28.1.2019 23

IVF/ICSI success rates by clinic in 2016

28.1.2019 24

Proportion of IVF/ICSI single embryo transfers by clinic in 2016

28.1.2019 25

The proportion of premature births (<37 gw) and low birth weight children (<2500 g), %

28.1.2019 26

The mean number of embryos per a live born child

28.1.2019 27

Need for better data

▪ Current data collection is based on aggregated data.

▪ The ART legislation (2007)

– National statistics are based on aggregated data.

– Each clinic has to keep a register.

– For research purposes clinical data can be combined.

▪ Monitoring of quality in ART services is limited.

– Benchmarking between clinics cannot be done by using case-mix.

– No information on the number of treatments per woman/couple.

– No information on cumulative success rate.

– No information on the effectiveness of ART services, e.g. the high use of FET.

28.1.2019 28

Need for better data

▪ Possibilities:

– To start a new quality register: informed consent is required as well as more funding.

– To collect cycle-based data for research: no informed consent is required, but there are limitation how the data can be used.

– The parliament has received a proposal for a new legislation on secondary use of health care information (2019?). In the background document, the request to initiate an IVF-register has been mentioned.

28.1.2019 29

Recommended