QCD Tests in Lepton-Proton Collisions

26/04/2000

QCD Tests in Lepton-Proton Collisions, DIS2000 1

• QCD tests in DIS and large pT photoproductio

n(non-diffractive processes)

– High-pT jets in DIS

– “Forward excess” and virtual photon structure

– Jets in photoproduction

– Heavy quark production

• QCD tests in diffractive processes

– Vector meson production

– Hadronic final state in diffraction

8th International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering and QCD (DIS2000)

April 26th, 2000Yuji Yamazaki

KEK-IPNS (DESY F1J)

“Collisions”: Fixed target experiments are not covered.

26/04/2000

QCD tests in hard-scatteringep collisions

The QCD test “shopping list” in DIS and photoproduction (PHP) processes

• Scaling violation in the structure function – the ultimate QCD test at HERA.

More comes from Hadronic Final State (HFS) study.

• DIS with 2 jets – O(s) or higher s determination– Gluon density g(x, Q2) [especially in low Q2]– Studies of higher order QCD dynamics (jet shape,

3 jets etc.)– Forward jet as a signal of BFKL dynamics and/or virtual ph

oton () structure function

• Particle production, fragmentation (strange, charm)

• Heavy Quark (HQ) production

• Photoproudction jets and HQ production

– Low ET: Real photon pdf at low x

Soft Underlying Event (SUE)

– High ET: Photon pdf at high x, gluon density at high xp

Test of QCD dynamics

In Mike’s talk

26/04/2000

Introduction to DIS HFS

• Difference from e+e– : Treatment of the “ladder” from p to Multi-scale Q2, ET

• Development: Dijet definition infrared safe (not discussed)Inclusive-k algorithm in Breit frame (pp like)

Trivial Lowest Order (QPM)

In Breit frame

• Cross section F2 • Final state – quark dominated

eesQ in 22giving the lengthof the current regionphase space

proton remnant

current qp

proton remnant

current target

gluondensity

quarkdensity

26/04/2000

• Inclusive-k algorithm in Breit frame –

longitudinal invariant cone-type, high ET, O(s) process

• Thus defined jets agree with NLO well for high ET

AND high Q2 region

Inclusive jet cross section and s

proceed to extract s

26/04/2000

S uncertainty from r

• Main uncertainty comes from renormalization scale ET , Q2

• Obtained s compatible

• The size of the uncertainty depends on the choice of the scale

smaller scale uncertainty for r = ET than Q2.

ET is the preferred theory here

Is this a good enough reason to choose ET ?

Let’s see the cross section behavior.

26/04/2000

• Dijet cross section (ET1 > 8 GeV, ET2 > 5 GeV in Breit frame) is measured as a function of ET

2/Q2 .

• ET2/Q2 dependence well reproduced by r = Q2

r = ET also OK for high ET2/Q2

• ET2 underestimates the cross section for large ET

• The scale uncertainty is larger for Q2 than ET2 (not shown)

Dijet xsection: ET2/Q2 dependenc

The theoretically stable r may not reproduce the data

ZEUS preliminary

H1, ZEUS talk WG2

Here the natural

scale is ET2 !

NLO misses something in low Q2?

New measurement “phase space scanning” in HFS variables:See also ET, Q2 and jet for inclusive cross section H1 talk in WG2

26/04/2000

• Using jet cross sections for obtaining s: Need to estimate the uncertainty from pdf.

Here the propagationof input s to the outputis studied by H1.

• ZEUS has estimated the gluon density uncertainty estimated from a global F2 fitting using scaling violation.

s measurement: pdf uncertainty

H1+ZEUS talk inWG2, new measurementand progress report

),()( 22 xgS

26/04/2000

• Dijet event: reconstruction of initial gluon momentum

through

• Benefit: gluon densityin relatively high x

• Again the choice of the scalemay give large difference.

• Low- excess = relation to the “forward excess”

– BFKL footprint

– virtual photon structure function

Measurement of g(x, Q2) using dijet events

)1( 22 QMxJJBj

gluon density at high scalewhere the cross section is stable

26/04/2000

Introduction to SF and BFKL effect on DIS HFS

DGLAP evolution “direct”

CCFM (LDCMC)

Q2 >> ET2

LEPTO, HERWIGNLO programs

Q2 ET2

Forward excess

• No MC available• No prediction with jet finder

Q2 << ET2 : QCD evolution

from photon• Forward excess• Low-x events

MC: RAPGAPNLO: JetViP

BFKL evolution

Forward jet

“Resolved” in virtual

Forward jet

26/04/2000

The structure at high Q2

• “DIS” cross section is measured as a function of xOBS

• Clear evidence of resolved events over LO calculation(NLO not sufficient – not shown)

• contribution decreases as Q2 becomes higher

Higher ET2

SF exists even at high Q2 for the high ET events

H1 talk WG2

26/04/2000

SF as an explanation ofthe forward excess

• Forward region: sensitive to BFKL signal

• Plugging the SF in:increases the forward(= low xBj) cross sectionand explains the data

• Cross section as a function of ET

2/Q2:Both LO MC (RAPGAP)and NLO (JetViP)explain the shape

A solution for the forward excess.Is this entire story ?

“direct” “resolved”

26/04/2000

• Forward (1.5 < < 3.1) 0 production at low-x (x ~ 10–

4)• For very low Q2 (2.0 < Q2 < 4.5) : SF estimates too l

ow• The modified BFKL (~ NLO) prediction is higher and clo

ser to the data

Virtual photon SF, is it enough ?

New measurement on jets, H1 talk in WG2

• NLO agrees with data for most of the phase space

• However: Large excess of data in low ET, low Q2, forwa

• NNLO calculation (or BFKL, resolved photon?) awaited

26/04/2000

Azimuthal asymmetries in hadron production and FL

• The twice oscillation ( |cos 2 |) comes fromthe longitudinal contribution ( boson-gluon fusion)

Semi-direct measurement of FL at HERA, consistent with QCD expectation.

),(),(21

))1(1(2

),2coscos(2

andasymmetry azymuthal therelate toproposal a

productionhadron inclusive-Semi

QxRQxRyy

ACRCBAzQdzddxdQ

ZEUS talk WG2

26/04/2000

Jets in Photoproduction

• Study on jets in photoproduction during first years

– Very large excess in low-ET cross section

– The excess mostly in the resolved process

– Large “pedestal” around jet in ET flow

Mainly attributed to Soft-Underlying-Events (SUE).

• Amount of the “jet pedestal” is measured

• The effect is expected to be smaller at higher ET …

talk WG2

26/04/2000

• Now with higher integrated luminosity

cross section measurement with higher ET is possible.

Very high ET PHP – test of QCD

NLO gives a good description of PHP dijets at high ET

26/04/2000

Very high ET PHP – photon SF

• Closer look to the cross section:A large cross section excess in central-forward rapidity (in Lab frame) over NLO.

• xOBS spectrum at high ET (> 2

5 GeV)The excess persists !

• Natural explanation: photon pdf in high x regionPHP at HERA is sensitive

to photon pdf in high x

Can’t we measure low x = gluon ?

talk WG1/2/3

26/04/2000

Low ET PHP: revisited. How we should proceed ?

• SUE bothers in measuring the “parton level” cross section

• One way:“subtract” the jet pedestal from SUE (estimated by MC)extract the LO parton density

• Another way: “less sensitive to SUE” method– single particle p

roduction – prompt photon

production

talk WG2

• Measuring the low-x pdf with large error

• Method indirect by subtracting the SUE effect.Any way out or we should forget ?

• For theorist: need also “uncorrected” xsectionas a starting point.

26/04/2000

Open charm production

• Now forward excess not related to SUE:

Charm shows also “Forward excess”.

• Both in DIS and PHP.

ZEUS 1996-97 ZEUS 1996-97

• For PHP: small x events resolved (virtual) photon

again ?“Massless” calculation inclu

de resolved effect (large ET/mc)

ZEUS talk WG2

• Comparison of xOBS with

massless NLO is awaited.• For DIS, associated jet x

BS should be checked.

26/04/2000

• Large excess is observed over LO/NLO

• Is this again due to “massless” effect ?(LO simulation: factor 2 increase)

• The reason is unknown, we need statistics to see the distribution differentially.

Open beauty production

talk WG2

26/04/2000

Summary on HFS in DIS/PHP

• Many issues are special for (*)p collisions

• Tremendous amount of understanding in “how to measure”

– Improved jet algorithm (inclusive-k in p or Breit)

– Infrared safe definition of the dijet cross section– Stable NLO calculations, improved MCs

• For most phase space the data agree with NLO

– High Q2 (> 100 GeV2), high ET (also in PHP), backward

– For these “good regions” : we can measure S, g(x), photon pdf in high x …

• Still data excess in many place: low Q2 and ET, forward jets.The NLO scale uncertainty also large (also choice of scale)– Important terms are missing in NLO

• Virtual photon SF, BFKL, NNLO ?– Similar effect in charm ? Massless solves this ? Necessary step to measure e.g. g(x, Q2) in low Q2

• Q2 = 0 suffers from SUE: any way out ?

We are near the completion, just need theoretical input !

26/04/2000

Introduction to QCD tests in diffractive processes

• Diffraction without a hard scale can be explained by an universal Pomeron Diffractive physics is traditionally classified as a so

ft phenomena. • The diffraction with a hard scale at Tevatron, LEP and

HERA has opened an wide range of QCD tests.

1. Soft hard: how is the transition of the underlying mechanism ?

2. How the hard scales play a role ?2 = f (Q2, t [, MV

2]) – are they similarly effective ?

Soft Pomeron

Hard scattering of“Hard Pomeron”and (virtual) photon 2-gluon exchange

and higher order

We could do only with these

pQCD modelof VM

Investigating by HFS and vector meson production

),(),(

QxtxdF

26/04/2000

Introduction to quasi-elastic Vector Meson (VM) production

Soft production mechanism – VDM

Good description forno hard scale process(e.g. light VM PHP at HERA)Slow rise of the cross section

Hard process

, ,by given scale Hard22

EM current conservation,SU(4) prediction

wave function

| g(x,Q2) |2 fast rise

Forming VMmuch after dipole collision

)()*( Vqqqq pqqVpep

26/04/2000

Elastic VM: W dependence in PHP

• Light VM (, , ): slow rise ~ 0.22 P(0) ~ 1.08

consistent with universal Pomeron• J/ : fast rise hard scale is

given by mc2 (= 2 GeV2, not so large!).

Now final (points not updated)

'4 0 b

26/04/2000

• A lot smaller shrinkage than the soft Pomeron if hard scale

In high-Q2, photon is small the blowup of the hadron size at high W cannot be detected by a small object– another evidence of being a hard process.

Shrinkage in J/ PHP

MV provides a hard scale.

)1)((4

dependence From

tVpp W

New result fromZEUS, talk in WG4

26/04/2000

• Q2 : expected to be another hard scale.• Light VM – no hard scale from mV : see p

• Result: – It rises more than soft Pomeron at Q2 > 1 GeV2

– Approaching to J/ only Q2 ~ 10 GeV2 ??? We don’t know.

– W slope slower than W2 (2 – 2) (Regge expectation)consistent with inclusive diffraction

VM: W dependence in *p

H1 PHPJ/

Need precise measurement

from P parametrization determined by inclusive cross section

H. Abramowicz W

softPomeron

26/04/2000

Q2 dependence: b-slope, L/T

• Expectation in b-slope:Soft: ~ 10 Ge

Hard: ~ 4 GeV–2

• b as a function of Q2:Slow approach, only at ~ 20 GeV–2 to the asymptotic value ?

L/T Q2/MV2 in naïv

e LO calculation

• Develops a lot slower than a linear rise

• Three models: all compatible to the data.

Need precise measurement

Again need precise measurement for distinguishing models

26/04/2000

Cross section ratio and SU(4) prediction – Q2 dependence

• The cross section ratio of the four VMs : : : J/ = 9:1:2:8

assuming EM current conservation (flavor independence).

• The ratio for / is badly broken for Q2 ~ 0• flat for

– mass effect ?

26/04/2000

VM ratio: is Q2 the right scale ?• Restoration of SU(4) at high Q2, what’s going on in low

Q2?• Universal behavior by taking Q2+MV

2 as a kinematical scale.

Compiled by B. Clerbaux

H1 talk: new result on in WG4 (also covers the topics for next pages)

Again: we want to havea bit more precision

26/04/2000

t-dependence and SU(4)

• Large t events (t > 1 GeV2) from proton dissociation.

• Light VM:no satisfactory explanation by soft+hard

• Charmonium is again described by pQCD – mc seems enough to give a hard scale

• The ratio of light VM follows SU(4) for t > 1 GeV2 t affects differently from Q2

26/04/2000

Heavy VM: cross section

• Surprisingly higher cross sections than LO theories

• Two theoretical models: Martin et al., Frankfurt et al.

– Both incorporate the skewed parton density(SPD) effect

– Many other effects can also raise the cross section [relativistic correction, real part of the amplitude, NLO corrections, Fermi momentum effect etc.]

• Seems we need SPD. Can’t we measure it directly ?

)(n larger thamuch )'( ,' ,)',( xgxgxxxxgA

Martin, Ryskin, Teubner Frankfurt, McDermott, Strikman

26/04/2000

• DVCS – the cleanest VM production

• No uncertainty from the wave function of VMs• Large mass from the virtual photon, x1 x2

able to measure SPD• Interference with BH : the real part of the amplitude.• ZEUS has observed the signal …

LO diagram

Bethe-Heitler (BH) diagramAnalogy toVM production

New result from H1: cross section measurementH1+ZEUS talk WG4

26/04/2000

Summary on Vector Mesons• Testing ground of pQCD by VM with a hard scale

• Current hypotheses are:

– Hard mechanism given by Q2, MV or t.

– A dipole scatters with p, then forms VM long time after– SPD seems necessary for heavy particles

• Are all these scenario true ? The status of measurement is– Data not precise enough to test models

[W dependence, b-slope, L/T]

– The role of Q2, MV or t as a hard scale seems different. Q2 may be MV , but MV in PHP in W dependence ? t seems different

• Way out – isolating non-perturbative wave function (WF) – DVCS: no uncertainty on WF effect, full pQCD

First glance: The data agrees with the predictionIdeas on DVCS mechanism seems

ok.– Measuring excited states (', ', ')

• In general theories are advanced– We foresee greater precision in coming year thanks to H

ERA’s larger int. lumi– we should provide sensible measurements !

26/04/2000

Detecting partonic mechanism in diffraction by HFS

• The transition from soft to hard Pomeron is seen in:– VM production [W, b-slope, t-distribution etc.] – Inclusive diffraction [W dependence steeper: howev

er the signal is not very clear]• Factorized Pomeron or pure pQCD ?

– Both models describe the F2D data well

Energy flow in P frame (LPS tagging)• Two jet structure in high MX, but not too aligned

– Indication of BGF diagram, gluonic Pomeron

Direct investigation by HFS and heavy flavor production

26/04/2000

HFS event shape in diffraction• Colourless system: analogy to e+e– final state ?

Thrust and sphericity

Diffraction final state is close to e+e–, but slightly broader

Transverse momentum in the “target region”

• Non-diffraction – soft spectrum in p

• Hard radiation from Pomeron

26/04/2000

• Charm production: diagrams limited, hard scale provided. Ideal measurement, but small statistics.

• Dijet production – partonic structure, gluon in P.Just Pomeron+resolved photon seems perfect ?

• Three jet structure: proving information ofpartonic dynamics.

HFS in diffraction: more to come

H1+ZEUS WG4

ZEUStalk WG4

H1 talk WG4

26/04/2000

A Remark on “Universal Pomeron”

• At HERA (Collins)Proton and photon vertex factorize

• At Tevatron: soft gluon exchangebetween two protons (SUE effect !)Reduction of gap survival probability

Factorization

Soft gluon exchange

• Is the Pomeron flux universal ?• Is this the right explanation ? Do

we understand the soft exchange ?

An open question

• Large rapidity gap rate is a lot smaller in Tevatron

– 10-20 % at HERA, 1-3 % at Tevatron

26/04/2000

Remarks on the luminosity and detector issues on QCD tests

• After upgrade: we lose the forward detectors.

– Tagging diffraction by LRG will be limitedFatal for the most of diffraction study

– Very forward hadron measurement will be difficult for studying both diffraction and HFS

• However: ~ 100pb–1 data by Sep 2000 !Statistical error can be improved by factor 2

– Most of the studies so far are with 5-30 pb–1

e.g. at Q2 ~ 4 GeV2 are still statistically limited

• For diffractions after upgrade: H1 FPS in the cold sectionHigh acceptance at xL ~ 0.97 (talk in WG4)

Analysing current data can answer many questions

Data until September 2000: last chance for many analyses

26/04/2000

Conclusions

• The QCD study in ep collision in last years has been investigated as a collision of (*) and p

• Here the study is more complicated than we thought

– The incoming “hadron” = photon varies its size (Q2)

However this gives us a rich testing ground of pQCD.

Non-diffraction

• Tremendous amount of progress in understanding NLO calculations, jet algorithms etcFake problems are gone

• The excess of the cross section is being identified

(low Q2, low ET, forward jets etc.)

• Qusestion: how these excess can be explained ?

– Need a bit more investigation, especially in theoryInteresting by itself, but also for extracting importa

nt quantities at low Q2 and ET ( g(x, Q2), s ?)

26/04/2000

Conclusions(2)

Diffraction and Vector Mesons

• The observations in last years have set the direction of to go: we know what to measure for the moment.

• Q: Is the proposed pQCD mechanism of VM production

valid ? How the hard scales (Q2, t, mV) play role ?

– Need more precision measurements

• Q: Partonic mechanism of the inclusive diffraction ?

– New analyses on HFS and HQ production may give some hints, may not. Let’s see

• Large luminosity now precise data (hopefully)

Promising future, challenge for experimentalist

QCD Tests in Lepton-Proton Collisions

Documents

decoding the QCD phase structure with relativistic nuclear ...pbm/talks/talk_pbm_dpg_sg.pdf · decoding the QCD phase structure with relativistic nuclear collisions ... quarks' near

STAR measurement on di -lepton spectrum from p+p collisions at 200 GeV

Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Recent Results from RHIC · 2015-12-02 · Lepton-Photon 2003 David Hardtke - LBNL 30 Conclusions • Qualitatively new physics in Au+Au collisions

Deep Inelastic Scattering in Lepton-Hadron …...1 Deep Inelastic Scattering in Lepton-Hadron Collisions —Probing the Parton Structure of the Nucleon with Leptons • Basic Formalism

Hard Probes in A-A collisions: jet-quenchingpersonalpages.to.infn.it/~beraudo/lecture_jet.pdf · The QCD Lagrangian QCD in elementary collisions QCD in heavy-ion collisions Due to

Nu Xu1/28The Phase Diagram of QCD, December 13 – 14, 2010, TIFR, Mumbai, India ICPAQGP 2010, Goa, India High-Energy Nuclear Collisions and QCD Phase Structure

Compact Stars, Heavy Ion Collisions and Lessons For QCD

Lepton-pair production in nuclear collisions past, present, future Hans J. Specht Ruprecht-Karls-Universitt Heidelberg Prague, October 26, 2007

The Phases of QCD in Heavy Ion Collisions and Compact StarsHeavy Ion Collisions and Compact Stars Krishna Rajagopal1 Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Charles Gale McGill Intermediate-mass lepton pairs in relativistic heavy-ion collisions Charles Gale McGill

Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions and the QCD Matter Phase

Exploring QCD Phase Diagram in Heavy Ion Collisions

QCD Tests in Lepton-Proton Collisions

Physics Opportunities with e+A Collisions at an Electron ... · are important (dominant?) player at RHIC and LHC Theory of Strong Interactions: QCD QCD requires fundamental investigation

QCD and deep inelastic scattering - Imperial College Londontapper/lecture/dis-lecture-1.pdfInelastic lepton-nucleon scattering The result for lepton-hadron scattering is: € M DIS

A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004

Study of the QCD Phase Structure through High Energy Heavy Ion Collisions

Wesley Smith, U. Wisconsin, August 22, 2006 DOE Review: Task B: Lepton Hadron Scattering - 1 Task B: Lepton-Hadron Collisions Graduate students (resident

Di-lepton production in p+p collisions at 200 GeV at STAR

Exploring Hot QCD Matter with ALICE PHENO11, Madison WIHot QCD Matter in ALICE1 Heavy Ion Collisions: what are we after? ALICE Overview ALICE results from