View
217
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
1
Problem #1
Year 0 Year l Year 2 Year 3
A. Investment 10,000Revenue 21,000Operating expenses 11,000Depreciation 10,000Operating Income 0Taxes 0EBIT(1-t) 0Depreciation 10,000OCF 10,000FCF 10,000 10,000
Payback 0ROI 0IRR 0NPV
@10% 909@35% 2,593
Project Type of Cash Flow
Year of Cash Flow
2
Year 0 Year l Year 2 Year 3
B. Investment 10,000Revenue 15,000 17,000Operating expenses 5,833 7,833Depreciation 5,000 5,000Operating Income 4,167 4,167Taxes 1,667 1,667EBIT(1-t) 2,500 2,500Depreciation 5,000 5,000OCF 7,500 7,500FCF 10,000 7,500 7,500
Payback 2,500 5,000ROI 50%IRR 31.9%NPV
@10% 3,017@35% 329
Project Type of Cash Flow
Year of Cash Flow
3
Year 0 Year l Year 2 Year 3
C. Investment 10,000Revenue 10,000 11,000 30,000Operating expenses 5,555 4,889 15,555Depreciation 3,333 3,333 3,333Operating Income 1,112 2,778 11,112Taxes 445 1,111 4,445EBIT(1-t) 667 1,667 6,667Depreciation 3,333 3,333 3,333OCF 4,000 5,000 10,000FCF 10,000 4,000 5,000 10,000
Payback 6,000 1,000 9,001ROI 60%IRR 33.5%NPV
@10% 5,282@35% 229
Project Type of Cash Flow
Year of Cash Flow
4
Year 0 Year l Year 2 Year 3
D. Investment 10,000Revenue 30,000 10,000 5,000Operating expenses 15,555 5,555 2,222Depreciation 3333.333 3333.333 3333.333Operating Income 11,112 1,112 555Taxes 4,445 445 222EBIT(1-t) 6,667 667 333Depreciation 3,333 3,333 3,333OCF 10,000 4,000 3,000FCF 10,000 10,000 4,000 3,000
Payback 0 4,001 7,001ROI 47%IRR 42.7%NPV
@10% 4,651@35% 822
Project Type of Cash Flow
Year of Cash Flow
5
A B C D
Payback 1 2 3 1ROI 0 50% 60% 47%IRR 0 31.9% 33.5% 42.7%NPV
@10% 909 3,017 5,282 4,651@35% 2,593 329 229 822
Project
Criteria
@10% @35%
A,D C D C DB B C D CC D B B B
A A A A
Payback
NPV
ROI IRR
Investment Criteria Summary
Ranking by Investment Criterion
6
What explains the differences in the rankings?– Payback method• Reflects the relative timing of cash flows but
is insensitive to the total amount of cash flow beyond the payback horizon
• Ignores the time value of money and the riskiness of the cash flows
• If a company is operating under binding capital constraints, the payback period is a crude indicator of how quickly funds are recovered to fund other projects in the queue
7
– Accounting ROI• Provides some indication of how a project
will affect some traditional measures of performance
• Does not reflect true cash flow, time value of money, and risk
– NPV– Reflects time value of money and risk– Gives us a $ measure of the value of a
project– IRR will give a similar decision as NPV (i.e.,
“accept” or “reject”, as long as cash flows are conventional
8
What project should be accepted?– If projects are independent, should
accept according to NPV ranking until capital runs out
– If projects are mutually exclusive, should accept either C or D, depending on the hurdle rate• The differences in the NPV rankings reflect
the relative timing of the cash flows. Such timing differences are not captured by the IRR (e.g. the IRR assumes for project D that the $10 million inflow in year 1 is reinvested at a rate equal to the IRR)
9
Problem #2Pro forma income statement
0 1 2 3 4 5Sales 10000 13000 13000 8666.6667 4333.3333Cost of Sales 6000 7800 7800 5200 2600SG&A 2350 3055 3055 2036.6667 1018.3333Introductory Expenses 200Depreciation 100 100 100 100 100Profit before taxes 1350 2045 2045 1330 615Taxes 540 818 818 532 246Profit after taxes 810 1227 1227 798 369
AssumptionsCost of sales = 60%
SG&A = 23.5%Change in NWC = 27%
ROR = 20%
10
FCFsAfter tax profits 810 1227 1227 798 369Depreciation 100 100 100 100 100OCF 910 1327 1327 898 469Cap Ex -500Change in Sales 10000 3000 0 -4333.3333 -4333.3333 -4333.3333Change in NWC 2700 810 0 -1170 -1170 -1170FCF -3200 100 1327 2497 2068 1639
IRR = 29.55%NPV @20% = $905.86
• Yes, the project should be undertaken because it has a positive NPV of $905, 861.• $1 million of development costs are sunk costs and should not be includedin the analysis
11
Management discloses it will issue new shares to finance a new project– Project NPV = $100,000– The market knows this and it is immediately
reflected on the stock price. That is, the stock price will rise to $110
– Thus, only 1,000 new shares need to be issued to fund the $110,ooo cost of the new project.
– The market value of VAI will rise to $1,210,000– Current shareholders will gain the full value of
the project (i.e. 10%), new shareholders will pay full (but fair) price for ownership in the firm
Problem #3
12
Problem #4
End of Year Time "Index" Investment Production Costs Revenues Sum PV
1967 0 ($100) ($100) (100.00)1968 1 ($200) ($200) (181.82)1969 2 ($200) ($200) (165.29)1970 3 ($200) 140 ($60) (45.08)1971 4 ($200) (490.00) 140 ($550) (375.66)1972 5 (490.00) 560 $70 43.461973 6 (490.00) 560 $70 39.511974 7 (490.00) 560 $70 35.921975 8 (490.00) 560 $70 32.661976 9 (490.00) 420 ($70) (29.69)1977 10 420 $420 161.93
Total ($900) ($2,940) $3,360 ($480) ($584)
At 210 units
13
End of Year Time "Index" Investment Production Costs Revenues Sum PV
1967 0 ($100) ($100) (100.00)1968 1 ($200) ($200) (181.82)1969 2 ($200) ($200) (165.29)1970 3 ($200) 200 $0 0.001971 4 ($200) (625.00) 200 ($625) (426.88)1972 5 (625.00) 800 $175 108.661973 6 (625.00) 800 $175 98.781974 7 (625.00) 800 $175 89.801975 8 (625.00) 800 $175 81.641976 9 (625.00) 600 ($25) (10.60)1977 10 600 $600 231.33
Total ($900) ($3,750) $4,800 $150 ($274)
At 300 units
14
End of Year Time "Index" Investment Production Costs Revenues Sum PV
1967 0 ($100) ($100) (100.00)1968 1 ($200) ($200) (181.82)1969 2 ($200) ($200) (165.29)1970 3 ($200) 320 $120 90.161971 4 ($200) (1000.00) 320 ($880) (601.05)1972 5 (1000.00) 1280 $280 173.861973 6 (1000.00) 1280 $280 158.051974 7 (1000.00) 1280 $280 143.681975 8 (1000.00) 1280 $280 130.621976 9 (1000.00) 960 ($40) (16.96)1977 10 960 $960 370.12
Total ($900) ($6,000) $7,680 $780 $1
Economic break-even at approximately 480 units
15
• At originally planned production levels, the project would have destroyed value for the firm
• Economic break-even is closer to 480 units (compared with total world market of 323 – 775 planes)
Lockheed Martin’s stock price
Recommended