View
68
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Effects of Geometrical Corrugation and Energetical Heterogeneity of Graphene Pore Walls on Adsorption in Nanoporous Carbons . PSD Characterization Jacek Jagiello Micromeritics Corporation, Norcross GA, USA. Relationship between assumed carbon pore model and calculated PSD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Effects of Geometrical Corrugation and Energetical Heterogeneity
of Graphene Pore Walls on Adsorption in Nanoporous Carbons.PSD Characterization
Jacek Jagiello
Micromeritics Corporation, Norcross GA, USA
Presentation outline
•Relationship between assumed carbon pore model and calculated PSD
•Standard slit pore model based on Steele potential
•Artifacts resulting from this model
•Modifications of the model– finite pores– energetically heterogeneous pore walls– geometrically corrugated (rough) walls– incorporation of both effects
•Improvements in PSD analysis
Fluid Density Calculated by DFT for Ar on Graphite
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Distance from Surface, z/s
r
p/p0=0.99
p/p0=0.7
p/p0=0.3
p/p0=0.001
How the PSD is calculated
PSD
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0 5 10 15 20
Pore Size, Å
PS
D, c
c/(g
Å)
1e-6 1e-5 1e-4 1e-3 1e-2 1e-1 1e+0
Den
sity
, r
(mm
ol/c
m3 )
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Relative Pressure
1e-6 1e-5 1e-4 1e-3 1e-2 1e-1 1e+0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Relative Pressure
n = 1
n =
Den
sity
, r
(mm
ol/c
m3 )
4-60 Å5.3 Å7.3 Å10.2 Å20.9 Å
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0.0000001 0.00001 0.001 0.1 10
Relative Pressure, P/Po
V,
cc(S
TP
)/g
Experimental Isotherm
Theoretical Isotherms (Kernel)
∫
Linear Fredholm integral equation of the first kind
Outline of 2D-NLDFT calculations
•Model NLDFT isotherms and density profiles are calculated using Tarazona approach [1, 2].
•Attractive fluid-fluid interactions are modeled by Weeks-Chandler-Andersen potential [3].
•Pore walls are constructed by structureless graphene sheets.
•External solid-fluid interaction potential is determined by numerical integration of the 12-6 Lennard-Jones potential over the graphene geometries.
______________________________1. Tarazona, P.; Marini Bettolo Marconi, U.; Evans R. Mol Phys 1987; 60, 573.2. Lastoskie, C.; Gubbins, K.E.; Quirke N. J Phys Chem 1993; 97, 4786-96.3. Weeks, J. D.; Chandler, D.; Andersen, H. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1971; 54,5237.
Carbon Slit Pore Model (History)
Rosalind E. Franklin Proceedings of The Royal Society of London Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences1951, 209, 196-218
Steele WA. The Interactions of Gases with Solid Surfaces, Pergamon, Oxford, 1974
N. A. Seaton, J. P. R. B. Walton and N. Quirke Carbon ,1989, 27, 853-861
C. Lastoskie, K.E. Gubbins, N. Quirke, Langmuir, 1993, 9, 2693.
J.P. Olivier, W.B. Conklin, M.V. Szombathely, in Characterization of Porous Solids (COPS-III) Proceedings,ed. by F. Rodriguez-Reinoso, J. Rouquerol, K.S.W. Sing, K.K. Unger (Amsterdam, 1994)
Relative pressure, p/p0
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Den
sity
, m
mo
l/cm
3
0
10
20
30
40
4 Å
10 Å7 Å
15 Å
30 Å
Artifacts of Carbon Slit Pore Model(NLDFT and Molecular Simulations)
NLDFT adsorption N2 isotherms for uniform flat slit pores (kernel)
Source ofNumericalProblem
Ustinov, E.A., Do, D.D., Fenelonov, V.B. Carbon 2006, 44, 653-663.
Neimark, A.V., Lin, Y., Ravikovitch, P.I., Thommes, M. Carbon 2009, 47, 1617-1628.
Lueking, A.D.; Kim, H.-Y.; Jagiello,J., Bancroft, K., Johnson, J.K., Cole, M.W. J. Low Temp. Phys. 2009, 157, 410–428.
Kernels by GCMC and NLDFTAre qualitatively similar.
15 Å 10 Å
7 Å 4 Å
30 Å
HRTEM Images of Activated Carbons
Atul Sharma, Takashi Kyotani, Akira Tomita, Carbon 38 (2000) 1977–1984
Skeletonized images ->
Bright Field STEM Image of UMC (Westvaco) Carbon
(Oak Ridge National Lab) Jagiello, J., Kenvin J., Olivier J.P., Lupini A.R., Contescu C.I., Ads. Sci & Tech. 29, 2011, 769-780.
STEM Image - Atomic Resolution
(Oak Ridge National Lab) Guo J, Morris JR, Ihm Y, Contescu CI, Gallego NC, Duscher G, Pennycook SJ, Chisholm MF.Small 2012;8:3283-3288.
Annular dark-fi eld (ADF) STEM images of UMC (a,b) and PFAC (c,d) processed to remove high-frequency noise and probe tail effects. The in-plane carbon atoms are clearly resolved, and large areas of hexagonal lattice (marked in blue) with a few five- and seven-atom ring defects (marked in red) can be seen.
Finite slit shape pores
Width, H
x L, length
y
Strip pore
Partially closed strip pore (channel)
H
L
Disc pore
Effective pore width, w=H-3.4 Ǻ
Marini Bettolo Marconi, U.; van Swol, F. Phys. ReV. A 1989, 39, 4109–4116.
Monson, P. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 084701.
Kozak, E., Chmiel, G., Patrykiejew, A., Sokolowski, S. Phys. Lett. A 1994, 189, 94-98.
Wongkoblap, A, Do, D.D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 13949-13956
Jagiello, J., Olivier, J. P. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 19382-19385.
Jagiello, J., Kenvin J., Olivier J.P., Lupini A.R., Contescu C.I., Ads. Sci & Tech. 29, 2011, 769-780
-∞ ∞
Density profiles across the pores H=27.6 Ǻ (w=24 Ǻ), L=30 Ǻ, p/p0=0.001
p/p0=0.001
x/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.001
X/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z//s
s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.001
X/sff
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Disc pore Strip pore Channel
Density profiles across the pores H=27.6 Ǻ (w=24 Ǻ), L=30 Ǻ, p/p0=0.01
p/p0=0.01
x/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.01
X/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z//s
s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.01
X/sff
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Disc pore Strip pore Channel
Density profiles across the pores H=27.6 Ǻ (w=24 Ǻ), L=30 Ǻ, p/p0=0.05
p/p0=0.05
X/sff
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Disc pore Strip pore Channelp/p0=0.05
x/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.05
X/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z//s
s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Density profiles across the pores H=27.6 Ǻ (w=24 Ǻ), L=30 Ǻ, p/p0=0.1
p/p0=0.1
x/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.1
X/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z//s
s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Disc pore Strip pore Channelp/p0=0.1
X/sff
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Density profiles across the pores H=27.6 Ǻ (w=24 Ǻ), L=30 Ǻ, p/p0=0.2
Disc pore Strip pore Channelp/p0=0.2
x/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.2
X/sff
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.2
X/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z//s
s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Density profiles across the pores H=27.6 Ǻ (w=24 Ǻ), L=30 Ǻ, p/p0=0.3
Disc pore Strip pore Channelp/p0=0.3
x/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.3
X/sff
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.3
X/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z//s
s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Density profiles across the pores H=27.6 Ǻ (w=24 Ǻ), L=30 Ǻ, p/p0=0.5
p/p0=0.5
X/sff
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.5
X/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z//s
s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Disc pore Strip pore Channelp/p0=0.5
x/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Density profiles across the pores H=27.6 Ǻ (w=24 Ǻ), L=30 Ǻ, p/p0=0.7
Disc pore Strip pore Channelp/p0=0.7
x/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.7
X/sff
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
z/s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.7
X/sff
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z//s
s ff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NLDFT Adsorption N2 Isotherms for Slit Pores
Relative pressure, p/p0
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Den
sity
, m
mo
l/cm
3
0
10
20
30
40
4 Å
10 Å7 Å
15 Å
30 Å
Infinite Slit Pores
Strip
Relative pressure, p/p0
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Den
sity
, m
mo
l/cm
3
0
10
20
30
40
4 Å
10 Å7 Å
15 Å
30 Å
Relative pressure, p/p0
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Den
sity
, m
mo
l/cm
3
0
10
20
30
40
4 Å
10 Å7 Å
15 Å
30 Å
Finite Pores, L=30 Ǻ
Channel
Relative pressure, p/p0
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Am
ou
nt
adso
rbed
, cm
3 (ST
P)/
g
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Experimental
Finite pore model
Infinite pore model
PSD Analysis for UMC (Westvaco) Carbon using Infinite and Finite Pore Models (Mix)
Fits of N2 Adsorption Isotherm Calculated PSDs
UMC sample kindly provided by Dr. Frederic Baker
Fitting error=16.8
10-5<p/p0<10-2 Fitting error = 4.2
Pore width, Å
0 10 20 30 40 50
PS
D,
cm3 /Å
/g
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Infinite modelFinite model (Strip+Channel)Strip component
Simple energetically and geometrically heterogeneous carbon infinite slit pore model
The model is derived from the Steele potential where the geometrical
heterogeneity is introduced only to the surface layer.
Objective:
Introduce minimal modifications to Steele potential that are necessary
to improve the model.
Carbon pore heterogeneity may be considered a combined effect of:
•Chemical composition (surface chemical groups)
•Variation of local density
•Variations of pore wall thickness
•Geometry (curvature, roughness)
External potential in heterogeneous pore
drrr
xxzx sfsfssf
612
2 )()(4),(ss
r
410
21 5
22)(
zzz sfsf
ssf sf
sssr
2,, 112 zzzxzxsf
The solid-fluid interaction potential of a gas molecule interacting with the graphitic surface:
For a uniform infinite graphitic surface:
zHxzHxzxV sfsfext 2
1,
2
1,),(
For a pore wall consisting of 3 graphitic surfaces:
sf, ssf –solid-fluid interaction parametersrs –solid surface density – distance between graphitic layers
The total external interaction potential in the pore Vext:
x*
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Vex
t/kT
-17
-16
-15
-14
-13
-12
-11
-10
Surface energy distributionUnit cell in periodic boundary conditions
x*
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
sf/k
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Multiple sites2 SitesUniform
Solid-fluid interaction parameter, sf
External potential at 1st adsorbed layer, Vext
Experimental and calculated adsorption isotherms on nongraphitized carbon black surface
Cabot BP280
Relative pressure
1e-6 1e-5 1e-4 1e-3 1e-2 1e-1 1e+0
Am
ount
ads
orbe
d, m
mol
/m2
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Carbon Black, BP 280Uniform surface
Multiple energy sites2 energy sites
N2 local densities in heterogeneous and uniform slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.00001
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in heterogeneous and uniform slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.0001
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in heterogeneous and uniform slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.0005
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in heterogeneous and uniform slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.001
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in heterogeneous and uniform slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.01
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in heterogeneous and uniform slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.05
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in heterogeneous and uniform slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.1
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in heterogeneous and uniform slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.2
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in heterogeneous and uniform slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.3
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in heterogeneous and uniform slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.4
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in heterogeneous and uniform slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0=0.5
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NLDFT Adsorption N2 Isotherms for Uniform and Heterogeneous Slit Pores
Relative pressure, p/p0
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Den
sity
, m
mo
l/cm
3
0
10
20
30
40
4 Å
10 Å7 Å
15 Å
30 Å
Relative pressure, p/p0
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Den
sity
, m
mo
l/cm
3
0
10
20
30
40
4 Å
10 Å7 Å
15 Å
30 Å
Heterogeneous poresUniform pores
15 Å 10 Å
7 Å 4 Å
30 Å
15 Å
10 Å 7 Å
4 Å
30 Å
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Effect of pore geometry on external wall potential
x*
-4 -2 0 2 4
y*
-4
-2
0
2
4
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6
Vext/kT
Uniform flat wall Uniform cylindrical wall Curved (corrugated) wall
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Pore geometry (roughness)Unit cell - periodic boundary conditions
Pore wall: 3 graphene layersSurface layer: z=0.3*sin(x)
H
External potential in flat slit and curved (rough) pores
410
21 5
22)(
zzz sfsf
ssf sf
sssr
2,, 11 zzzxzxsf
zHxzHxzxV sfsfext 2
1,
2
1,),(
The solid-fluid interaction potential of a gas molecule interacting with a graphene surface:
For a flat infinite graphene:
For a pore wall consisting of 3 graphene surfaces:
sf, ssf –solid-fluid interaction parametersrs –solid surface density – distance between graphitic layers
The total external interaction potential in the pore Vext:
For a curved surface is obtained by numerical integration.),( zx
p/p0
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Am
oun
t ad
sorb
ed,
mm
ol/m
2
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
A8 D4 D5 D8 BP 280Carbopack FStandard NLDFT
N2 Isotherms measured for standard reference carbon blacks, graphitized carbon black Carbopak F
and the standard NLDFT model
Experimental and calculated adsorption isotherms on nongraphitized carbon black surface
Cabot BP280
Relative pressure
1e-6 1e-5 1e-4 1e-3 1e-2 1e-1 1e+0
Am
ount
ads
orbe
d, m
mol
/m2
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Carbon Black, BP 280 (Experimental)Flat surface model
Curved surface model
N2 local densities in curved and flat slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.00001
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in curved and flat slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.0001
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in curved and flat slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.0005
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in curved and flat slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.01
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in curved and flat slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.05
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in curved and flat slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.1
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in curved and flat slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.2
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in curved and flat slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.3
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in curved and flat slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.4
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N2 local densities in curved and flat slit pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0=0.5
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x*
-2 -1 0 1 2
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Relative pressure, p/p0
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Den
sity
, m
mo
l/cm
3
0
10
20
30
40
4 Å
10 Å7 Å
15 Å
30 Å
NLDFT Adsorption N2 Isotherms for Flat Slit and Curved Pores
Relative pressure, p/p0
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Den
sity
, m
mo
l/cm
3
0
10
20
30
40
4 Å
10 Å7 Å
15 Å
30 Å
Curved poresFlat slit pores
Source ofNumericalProblem
15 Å 10 Å
7 Å 4 Å
30 Å
15 Å
10 Å 7 Å
4 Å
30 Å
Pore width, Å
0 10 20 30 40 50
PS
D, c
m3 /Å
/g
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Uniform slitHeterogeneous slit (EH)Corrugated slit (GC)
(b)
Relative pressure, p/p0
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Am
ou
nt
adso
rbed
, cm
3 (ST
P)/
g
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
ExperimentalCorrugated slit (GC)Heterogeneous slit (EH)Uniform slit
(a)
PSD Analysis of PC76 Carbon using Flat Slit and Curved Pore Models
Fits of N2 Adsorption Isotherms Calculated PSDs
PC76 – PET derived carbon,
J. Jagiello, C.O. Ania, J.B. Parra, J.J. Pis, Carbon 45 (2007) 1066–1071.
New Model 2D- NLDFT Incorporating Energetical Heterogeneity and Geometrical Corrugation
Variation of the solid-fluid interaction parameter given by trigonometric series.
-18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0
x*
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z *
0
2
4
6
8
10
)/2sin()( xxsf
Vext/kT
New Model 2D- NLDFT Incorporating Energetical Heterogeneity and Geometrical Corrugation
p/p0
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Am
oun
t ad
sorb
ed,
mm
ol/m
2
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Exp BP 280Standard NLDFTEH-GC 2D-NLDFT
Selected 2D-NLDFT isotherms for N2 adsorption calculated for carbon
slit pores and open surface compared with BP 280 data
p/p0
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Am
oun
t ad
sorb
ed,
mm
ol/m
2
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Exp BP 280Open Surfacew=15 Åw=20 Åw=30 Å
N2 local densities in curved and energetically heterogeneous pores with w=24 Ǻ
p/p0 = 0.0001
x*
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0 = 0.001
x*
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0 = 0.01
x*
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0 = 0.1
x*
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0 = 0.2
x*
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
z*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0 = 0.3
x*
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p/p0 = 0.5
x*
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
r
0.001
0.002
0.005
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.5
1
2
5
10
PSD Analysis of PC58 and PC76 Carbons using 2D-NLDFT Model for EH-GC Surface
Pore width, Å
0 10 20 30 40 50
PS
D, c
m3/Å
/g
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Standard NLDFT2D-NLDFT, EH-GC
Pore width, Å
0 10 20 30 40 50P
SD
, cm
3 /Å/g
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Standard NLDFT2D-NLDFT, EH-GC surface
Conclusions
• We modify the standard carbon slit pore model by changing surfaces of pore walls from flat and homogeneous to:
a. Flat energetically heterogeneousb. geometrically corrugated (rough)c. geometrically corrugated and energetically heterogeneous
• These assumptions lead to the heterogeneity of the adsorption potential.
• As a result, filling of pores is gradual and the layering transition steps are significantly reduced or eliminated.
• The carbon PSD analysis from such models are free of known artifacts:– Fits are improved – Calculated PSDs do not show the typical gap at 10 Å.