PowerPoint Slides for Chapter 1: Heritable Material by A. Malcolm Campbell, Laurie J. Heyer, &...

Preview:

Citation preview

PowerPoint Slides for Chapter 1:Heritable Material

by A. Malcolm Campbell, Laurie J. Heyer, & Christopher Paradise

1.4 How does DNA’s shape affect its function?

Integrating Concepts in Biology

Title Page Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Biology Learning Objectives• Draw the structure of DNA showing the double helix

and base pairings.• Demonstrate how DNA replication is

semiconservative.• Evaluate experimental design and analyze data from

research on DNA as molecular information.

Bio-Math Exploration Learning Objectives• Estimate the amount of DNA in a sample by finding

the area under a curve.• Determine the number of generations that have passed

in a population of cells.

Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Fig.1.9

Nucleotide Structures

You should be able to distinguishdeoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from ribonucleic acid (RNA),

Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

You should be able to distinguishdeoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from ribonucleic acid (RNA),

Fig. 1.9

Nucleotide Structures

Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

DNAdATP

RNAATP

Fig. 1.9

Nucleotide Structures

Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Fig. 1.9

rotate 90°

2’ carbondATP

Nucleotide Structures

Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Nucleotide Structures

Fig. 1.9

ATP or dATP?

Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Watson and Crick DNA Model

Fig. 1.10 from Watson and Crick, 1953

Watson and Crick DNA Model

Fig. 1.10 from Watson and Crick, 1953

Watson and Crick DNA Model

Fig. 1.10 from Watson and Crick, 1953

Watson and Crick DNA Model

Fig. 1.10 from Watson and Crick, 1953

Watson and Crick DNA Model

Fig. 1.10

Can you spot their error?from Watson and Crick, 1953

Watson and Crick DNA Model

Fig. 1.10

Can you spot their error?from Watson and Crick, 1953

Watson and Crick DNA Model

Fig. 1.10

phosphate

should be anti-parallel strandsfrom Watson and Crick, 1953

Chemical Bonds

Fig. 1.11 Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Chemical Bonds

Fig. 1.11

You should be able to match these representations with the appropriate chemical bonds.

Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Chemical Bonds

Fig. 1.11 Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Chemical Bonds

Fig. 1.11 Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Chemical Bonds

Fig. 1.11

Match the chemicalrepresentations withthe appropriate bonds.

Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Chemical Bonds

Fig. 1.11 Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Chemical Bonds

Fig. 1.11 Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Chemical Bonds

Fig. 1.11

Describe the generalrules for each bond type found in biologicalexamples.

Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Chemical Bonds

Fig. 1.11 Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Chemical Bonds

Fig. 1.11

(N or O) and H

bases (+) and acids (-)

any element, often

C – C, C – O, C – N, C – H

Copyright © 2015 by AM Campbell, LJ Heyer, CJ Paradise. All rights reserved. 

Maurice Wilkins’ data Rosalind Franklin’s data

X-ray Diffraction of DNA

Fig. 1.12 from Wilkins, et al., 1953 and from Franklin and Gosling, 1953.

Maurice Wilkins’ data Rosalind Franklin’s data

X-ray Diffraction of DNA

Fig. 1.12 from Wilkins, et al., 1953 and from Franklin and Gosling, 1953.

Watson & Crick Base Pairs

Fig. 1.13

Find their mistake.

modified from Watson and Crick. 1953b

Watson & Crick Base Pairs

Fig. 1.13

Find their mistake.

modified from Watson and Crick. 1953b

Watson & Crick Base Pairs

Fig. 1.13

missed H-bond

modified from Watson and Crick. 1953b

Watson & Crick Base Pairs

Fig. 1.13 too far for H-bond modified from Watson and Crick. 1953b

Watson & Crick Base Pairs

Fig. 1.13

pyrimidines

1

1

modified from Watson and Crick. 1953b

Watson & Crick Base Pairs

Fig. 1.13

purines

12

12

modified from Watson and Crick. 1953b

Always Three Rings Wide

Fig. 1.13

12

12

modified from Watson and Crick. 1953b

3

3

3 Models of DNA Replication

Fig. 1.14modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

3 Models of DNA Replication

Fig. 1.14

all old DNA

What are the implications for each model?

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

3 Models of DNA Replication

Fig. 1.14

half old

half new

semi-conservative

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

3 Models of DNA Replication

Fig. 1.14

all old

all new

conservative

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

3 Models of DNA Replication

Fig. 1.14

all stands half new

mosaic

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

3 Models of DNA Replication

Fig. 1.14

all stands half new

mosaic

all old

all new

conservative

half old

half new

semi-conservative

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

high concentration of salt(high density)

low concentration(low density)

Fig. 1.15Afrom Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.15A

they wanted the DNA to appear about the same total darkness at each time point

backgroundsvary due to

different photographic

exposure times

from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.15A

evenly distributed DNA0

from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.15A

partially equilibrated DNA15

from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.15A

fully equilibrated DNA43

36

from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.15A

density of normal (light 14N) DNA

from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.15B

mix DNA made of 14N (light)

and15N (heavy)

centrifuge in salt gradient

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.15B

density of light(14N) DNA

density of heavy(15N) DNA

mix DNA made of 14N (light)

and15N (heavy)

centrifuge in salt gradient

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.15B & C

(15N) DNA

(14N) DNA

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.15B & C

(15N) DNA

(14N) DNA

quantifying DNA in each band

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.16

experiment performed twice

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.16

experiment #1

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.16

experiment #2

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.16

all cells (DNA) grown in heavy 15N

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.16

harvest cells (DNA) at time zero

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.16

all cells (DNA) switched to light 14N

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.16

harvest cells (DNA) at several time points

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.16

separate new DNAby salt gradient

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

separate mixed DNAby salt gradient

Fig. 1.17modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.17

DNA centrifuged

43 hours

high salt densityon right side

all old/heavy (15N)

time = 0(in generations)0

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.17

high salt densityon right side

quantify DNAin band

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

all 15N DNA

half 15N, half 14N DNAFig. 1.17modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.17

all heavyall light

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.17

all heavyall light

DNA replicated

once

half 15N, half 14N DNAmodified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.17

all heavyall light

DNA replicatesat different times

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.17

DNA replicated

~ twice

all 15N DNA

50% 15N DNA

what has happened? 1.9

all heavyall light

14N 15N 15N14N

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

Fig. 1.17

DNA replicated

~ twice

all 15N DNA

50% 15N DNA

what has happened? 1.9

all heavyall light

14N 15N 15N14N

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

all 15N DNA

50% 15N DNA

what has happened? 1.9

1.0

0

Fig. 1.17

all heavyall light

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

all 15N DNA

50% 15N DNA

half DNA is 100% 14N

half DNA is 50% 14N 50% 15N

1.9

1.0

0

Fig. 1.17

all heavyall light

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

3 Models of DNA Replication

Fig. 1.14

all stands half new

mosaic

all old

all new

conservative

half old

half new

semi-conservative

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

all 15N DNA

50% 15N DNA

1.9

1.0

0

Fig. 1.17modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

all 15N DNA

50% 15N DNA

1.9

1.0

0

Fig. 1.17

✓ data

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

50% 15N DNA

1.9

1.0

0

all 15N DNA

half DNA is 50% 14N 50% 15N

Fig. 1.17

half DNA is 100% 14N

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

50% 15N DNA

1.9

1.0

0

all 15N DNA

half DNA is 50% 14N 50% 15N

Fig. 1.17

✓ datahalf DNA is 100% 14N

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

3 Models of DNA Replication

Fig. 1.14

all stands half new

mosaic

all old

all new

conservative

half old

half new

semi-conservative

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

4

0 & 2

0 & 4

# replications

Fig. 1.17modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

4

0 & 2

0 & 4

# replications

Fig. 1.17

all heavy

all light

modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

4

0 & 2

0 & 4

# replications

Fig. 1.17modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

4 = 16 copies

0 = 1 copy+2 = 4 copies

# replicationspercentage

14N mixed 15N

12.587.5 0.0

40.040.0 20.0

7.552.5 40.0 0 = 1 copy+4 = 16 copies

Fig. 1.17modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Meselson & Stahl Experiments

DNA is replicated in a semiconservative

process

Fig. 1.17modified from Meselson and Stahl. 1958.

Recommended