Post-Fire Monitoring: Putah Creek Watershed...1/6 3/7 3/11. Aluminum (mg/L) St Helena Ck Coyote Ck...

Preview:

Citation preview

Case 2: Post-Fire Putah Creek WQ Monitoring

Alex Rabidoux, PESolano County Water Agency

Location

San Francisco

Sacramento

Vacaville

Middletown

Cobb

Cobb

Middletown

Wildfires in 2015

Fire Area (acres)

Wragg Fire (Solano) 8,000

Rocky Fire (Lake) 70,000

Jerusalem Fire (Lake) 25,000

Valley Fire (Napa-Lake)- 1,955 Structures- 1,281 Homes- 4th Most-Destructive Fire

76,000

Total = 180,000 acres (333 mi2)(10 x Lake Berryessa)

Post-Fire WQ Monitoring• Water Quality concerns to Lake, Napa, and Solano Counties• Lake Berryessa provides huge dilution but...“Godzilla El Nino”• Partnered with Hidden Valley Lake CSD & Napa County for WQ monitoring

Sample Locations

Middletown

Name Description

SHC St Helena Ck (Control)

CYC Coyote Ck (Partial, Small Trib)

UPC Putah Ck (Upper, Sig Burn Impact)

LBRID Putah Ck (Middle, U/S L. Berryessa)

Sample Locations

Winters

Name Description

PC@MD Putah Ck (Lower D/S L. Berryessa)

COC Cold Canyon Ck (U/S of Putah Ck)

LS@PDD Lake Solano @ Div Dam (Intake)

*Most significant post-fire WQ impacts

Constituents

Title 22 (Mineral, Physical, Inorganics) + TOC/DOC + NutrientsTier I (All Samples)

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Tier II (All except Coyote Ck)

Trihalomethane Formation Potential (TTHMFP)Tier III (Interdam Reach only)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

120

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16

Rain

(in)

Stre

am F

low

(cfs

)

Upper Putah Creek - Rain & Runoff

Precip

Flow (Daily Avg)

1/6

3/7

3/11

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

120

250

500

750

1,000

Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16

Rain

(in)

Stre

am F

low

(cfs

)

Lower Putah Creek - Rain & Runoff

Precip

Flow (Daily Avg)

1/6 3/7 3/11

ResultsWhat did we see?• Cold Canyon Creek (Interdam Reach) had the worst WQ• No significant WQ degradation in Upper Putah Creek• Upper Putah Creek has excellent WQ!• Godzilla El Nino Average Water Year for Putah Creek

Physical Properties

0

100

200

300

400

1/6 3/7 3/11

Specific Conductance (uS/cm)

St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

0

50

100

150

200

1/6 3/7 3/11

Alkalinity (mg/L)

St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

Organics

0

5

10

15

20

25

1/6 3/7 3/11

Total Organic Carbon (mg/L) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

0

2

4

6

8

10

1/6 3/7 3/11

Dissolved Organic Carbon (mg/L)St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1/6 3/7 3/11

TTHMFP (ug/L) Putah Ck @ M_Dam

Cold Canyon Ck

Putah Ck @ Div Dam

MCL = 80 ug/L

Sediment

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1/6 3/7 3/11

Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

8,300

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1/6 3/7 3/11

Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

0

100

200

300

400

500

1/6 3/7 3/11

Turbidity (NTU) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

2,000

0

100

200

300

1/6 3/7 3/11

Color (C.U.) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

Secondary MCL = 15 C.U.

3,000

Nutrients

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1/6 3/7 3/11

Total Nitrogen (mg/L) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

0

2

4

6

8

1/6 3/7 3/11

Phosphorus (mg/L) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

1/6 3/7 3/11

Ortho Phosphate (mg/L)

St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

Minerals & Metals

0

10

20

30

1/6 3/7 3/11

Arsenic (ug/L)St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

MCL = 10 ug/L

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1/6 3/7 3/11

Total Chromium (ug/L) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

MCL = 50 ug/L

Note: For surface water, Cr(III) is most prevalent form.

0

1

2

3

4

1/6 3/7 3/11

Barium (mg/L) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

MCL = 1 mg/L

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1/6 3/7 3/11

Mercury (ug/L) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

DL = 0.06 ug/L

RL = 0.20 ug/L

MCL = 2 ug/L

0

5

10

15

20

1/6 3/7 3/11

Aluminum (mg/L) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

MCL = 1 mg/L

65

Note: High levels from sediment. (Most abundant metal in earth’s crust)

0

10

20

30

40

1/6 3/7 3/11

Iron (mg/L) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

69

Secondary MCL = 0.3 mg/L

Note: High levels from sediment. (2nd most abundant metal in earth’s crust)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1/6 3/7 3/11

Manganese (mg/L) St Helena CkCoyote CkUpp Putah CkPutah Ck @ LBRIDPutah Ck @ M_DamCold Canyon CkPutah Ck @ Div Dam

Secondary MCL = .05 mg/L

11

Conclusion• Cold Canyon Creek (Interdam Reach) had the worst WQ• Primarily in suspended sediment [TSS = 8,300 mg/L; TDS = 270 mg/L]• No significant WQ degradation in Upper Putah Creek• Upper Putah Creek has excellent WQ!

Where in the Watershed?

Recommended