View
221
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
1/112
Sri: Krishnam Vande: JagadgurumSvabha:vastu Pravartate:Indeed it is Nature that Acts
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
2/112
Na kartrutvam na karma:Ni lo:kasya srujati Prabhuh|Na karmaphalasamyo:gamsvabha:vastu pravartate:The Lord creates neither agency nor objects for the world; norcontact with the fruits of works; ratherthe nature of things
operates.(Sri: Krshna Parama:tma : Sri:mad Bhagavad Gi:ta 5: 14)
Neither agency the Lord, i.e., the Self, impels not the world to do
the work; nor does He create objects that are sought after, viz.,chariots, pots, mansions, etc., with the objects made.
Doubt:If nothing whatsoever the embodied self does or causes to bedone, who then operates, both as direct agent and causative agent?
Answer:Nature, prakrti as nescience, Ma:ya:, operates as will be
affirmed in Bhabavadgi:ta 7: 14: Indeed this divine Ma:ya:consisting of the consistituents
(Sri:mad Bhagavad Gi:ta 5: 14, Sri: Samkara Bha:shyam)
Translation by Dr. A. G. Krishna Warrier
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
3/112
Prakrtye:va cha karma:Ni kriyama:Na:ni sarvasah|Yahpasyati tatha:tma:namakarta:ram sa pasyati He alone sees who, on all sides, sees actions (as) solelyperformed by Prakrti and sees, also, the Self as a non-agent
(Sri: Krshna Parama:tma : Sri:mad Bhagavad Gi:ta 13: 29)
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
4/112
Sri: A:di Samkara Bhagavatpu:jyapa:da:hFOUNDER,Ka:rmik Linguistic Theory
taya: prakrtya: e:va cha - na anye:na mahada:dika:ryakaraNa:ka:rapariNataya: karma:Ni va:ngmanahka:yarabhya:Ni kriyama:Na:ni nirvartyama:na:ni sarvasahsarvapraka:raih (yah pasyati upalabhate:)..(Sri:mad Bhagavad Gi:ta 13: 29, Sri: Samkara Bha:shyam)
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
5/112
Sri: A:di Samkara Bhagavatpu:jyapa:da:hFOUNDER,Ka:rmik Linguistic Theory
by thatprakrti,solely, that has transformed itself into effects and instruments such asmahat,etc., are the activities of speech, mind, and body performed, on allsides in all manner of ways(Sri:mad Bhagavad Gita 13: 29, Sri: Samkara Bha:shyam)
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
6/112
spos t ona reat v ty nEnglish
Word-formation Processes:Evidence for Ka:rmik LinguisticTheoryBy
Chilukuri Bhuvaneswar
Pioneer ofKa:rmik Linguistic Theory
Ka:rmik Literary Theory
Ka:rmik Language Teaching Approach
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
7/112
ims and !"#ectives $
Aim:
To Provide a Ka:rmik LinguisticMotivation for
Word-formation in English
in theKa:rmik Linguistic Paradigm
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
8/112
ims and !"#ectives % Objectives
1. To Discover Empirical Evidence forThe Principles of Exploration of
Variables
(PEV
E!V PEV !"V !"V(DEC& Exploration of Contextual Variables
PE& Productive Extension of Variables
C'& Creation of New Variables
CNV(D) Deletion of Variables
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
9/112
ims and !"#ectives (
2. To reveal the
Computational Designin theLinguitecture
ofEnglish Word-formation
as a
Ka:rmikopoeitic Sub-System
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
10/112
)ypothesisThe linguitecture of English Word-
formation is D!P"!T"#$LL%
&'E$TED( M"D)ED( T'$#!)"'MED
and esta"lished "y
#ndivid$al%!ollective%!ontext$al%
!onj$nction%and%&tandardi'ationof in)$al Action
*+CCC,*L
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
11/112
era ure ev e/: esearc0ap
1. #n the in)$istic Anal*sis ofEn)lish +ord%formation
Processes, the foc$s is onl* onthe individ$al -ord%formation
processes and their descriptionand motivation and
orpheme/+ord%0ased
orpholo)*.. The in)$itect$re of En)lish+ord%formation Processes is not
motivated as a +2OE% %
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
12/112
KLT Procedure
1. 2. K! Procedure
"t consists of t#ree divisions$ 1. Pre%an&ua&e' 2. t an&ua&e' *. Post%an&ua&e
+n practice2 KLT is applied "y starting /ith %3 t 4 Language ,tage /ith a small revie/ ofpproaches to Living as follo/s in 5 stages and then Post-language at the 6 th,tage3 Within the 6th,tage2 the 7rst stage Pre-Language is discussed3
4. Approaches to ivin): 1. Di5erent Approaches6 . 7A:8#7 #V#"9 APP8OA!2: 1.7a:rmi3 ivin) Pro)ramme6 . The 9ame of 7armaphalabho:)am (97P0
1. +rst2 "y data collection :
(/hich gives us the W)T of language in 8uestion for analysis9
2. second,patternin) and str$ct$rin)the data into clearly identi7a"le categories2 types2 andclasses */hich gives the )!W of language in terms of its !rganiation9
*. t#ird2 discovering concepts and principlesfrom the patterned and structured data
*/hich gives the )!W of language in terms of its Principles for !rganiation9
-. fourt#2 developing s*stemic choice net-or3sfor the system
*/hich gives the )!W of language in terms of its Dispositional Conceptualiation9 and
. +ft#,motivating systemic choices from disposition and "uilding up the lan)$a)e as adispositional socioco)nitive lin)$istic s*stem
created and used for the constr$ction of 3a:rmi3 realit* via dispositional realit* via
actional realit*.
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
13/112
pproach to Language fromLiving
Trait Theory
;ehaviouralCognitive pproach
Personality Psychodynamicpproach
Theories )umanistic pproach
,ocioculturalpproach
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
14/112
+n trait theory2 the diicts2 and desires9
in the humanistic approach2 they are e=plained via ho/ peopleachieve selfhood2 and realie their potential2
and in the sociocultural approach2 they are e=plained in termsof ho/ a particular culture is descri"ed in terms of another
culture?s *Western Culture conceptions of human individuality
and the self3 ll these theories are atomic and take into consideration only
one or more aspects of living "ut not all into consideration9 thatis /hy each is true in its o/n limited /ay "ut not true as a
/hole3
The 7a:rmi3 ivin) theor* ta3es all of them intoconsideration and develops the theor* of lan)$a)e. This
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
15/112
Game of Karmaphalabho:gam (GKPB)1
In Ka:rmik Living Theory, living systems (especially,human beings) are programmed in
aUniversalKa:rmik Living Programme where each individual has his own
ParticularCombination and Permutation(as Variation) of KLP as IKLP these variations can beintrinsically
GCSDMed from the veryconstitutionof the rules withmultiplevariables (not asbinary choices) in
US [Action Living- Lingual Action].
The basis of the IKLP is UKLP but it is fashioned out according toones individualKarma(as disposition) in the
[Supra-Macro-Micro]Cosmic Network
from US [Action-Living-Lingual Action]
for the construction of his/her own ka:rmik reality in aholarchy.
It is done through theka:rmik principles of action and its experience
0KP; %
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
16/112
0KP; % +n 0ame Theory2 there are constitutiverules /hich
are 7=ed "ut the performativerules are not3
In KLT, there areexperiential (ka:rmik), choice (dispositional), andaction (KDA) rules vis a vistheConstitutiveandPerformativerulesand are independently I-I-Ied throughDispositionin a language forconstructingKa:rmik Reality.
The KDA rules of language are SEMIOTIC;
arecreated-modified-transformedby dispositional- [socioculturalspiritual-contextual actional]-cognition
oflingual action
in the construction of
ka:rmik realityin aholarchybyICCCSA.
This is a ka:rmik process with its own principles and concepts
such as Principles of Creation of Action [eg. PEV, Creation OA;P.Choice OA, P.Cognition OA, PO Symbolization of Action]; ICCCSA;
N-w-N; A-W-F;
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
17/112
GKPB through Languageing
In a game, there are players, playing instruments (means), and play(for scoring points on a competitive basis), a field (base), and rules
bound by SPACE-TIME-MATTER.
In theGame of Living (GKPB), the STM limitations are different: NoSTM limits across the board inprinciple
The Game of Languageing is a game (languageing)-within-a-game
(of living)-as-a-double (ie., semiotic) game;It is played by the principle of dispositional, discrete permutation
It is played as a tool as a system as a resource all as means in abigger game of living played in the still bigger game of creation.
a rm ons u ve an t
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
18/112
a:rm ons u ve an erormatve.ules
In ordinary games such as football, cricket, etc., the games are fixed asthis and that to be so and so in such and such manner in terms of
theconstitutive rules and all the players have to follow them. Forexample, scoring goals in football. However, the players can have anoption in their performance to score the goals by different,
permissible combinations and permutations of the moves in scoringthe goals. But they should not switch from one game to anothergame within the same game. They have to follow the fixed rules.
In thegames of ka:rmaphalabho:gam (through languageing), theconstitutive rulesare dispositionally GCSDMed by each individualunlike in ordinary games, ie.,each individual designs his own gamefreely. For example, an individual may like to play the game of adoctor and then mix it with farming and play the game as he likes.
There isflexibilityin the performative as well as the constitutiverules; and language gaming isa game within a game.
It is only at the US [Action-Living-LA], the rules are fixed as Design(Linguitecture) and Construction (Languageering) Rules whichform the basis for constitutive and performative rules.
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
19/112
0KP; % Contd3
This is the point of departure fromGenerative Grammar, where theconstitutive rules are taken to be FIXED in the UG along with theParameters through binary (parametric) choices;
InSFG, the choice of the constitutive (paradigmatic) rules gives us the
performative (syntagmatic) structures in a system as analyticalsteps in the grammars construal of meaning (Halliday andMatthiessen:Introduction to Functional Grammar 2004: 24)
NOconscious choice is suggested
[In KLT, it is the collectivized conscious choices that determine both the
paradigm and the individual choice the syntagm.]
InCognitive Linguistics, grammar is conceptualization in terms ofcertain principles.
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
20/112
Paradigm-Syntagm-Ka:rmagm
Paradigmis what goes instead of what;Syntagmis what goes together with what
Ka:rmagmis whybecomeswhatashow
the ka:rmik (experiential) choice of both the paradigm and syntagm [para-syngm] as this andthat to be so and so in such and such manner.
Ka:rmagm is dispositionallycreatedbya flash of insightful behaviour (at the pasyanticonceptualization level)along the diagonal axis andresolvesitself into the vertical
(paradigmatic) and horizontal (syntagmatic) axes in open-endedgradual evolution (atthe madhyama (P&S) level).The ka:rmik axis is thecauseof the other two axes.
Paradigmatic Axis Ka:rmatic Axis
Syntagmatic Axis
Finally, it is realized as the concerned word at thevaikhari (Material Form)level. All these three phases are
dispositionally GCSDMed by CAUSALLY experiential (KA:RMIK) processing for the construction ofKa:rmik Reality. Here, the cause decides thesystemas well as thestructure.
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
21/112
QLB as an Example In the case of QLB, along theparadigmaticaxis, aQUOTEFIX()goes
instead of a Prefix, Suffix, etc. in theQLB Affixationprocess.
Prefix
Affixation Suffix
Quotefix (the paradigmatic choice)
Along thesyntagmaticaxis, the initial, medial, and final positions of thequotefix are the choices:
1. Initial Quotefix:alana:Ti smrutulu
2. Medial Quotefix:rebelsmo:ta
3. Final Quotefix: da:ruNabandhamulu
Theka:rmikaxis is the fountain spring of theDisposition-qualified-Consciousness (D-q-C)which by aflash of insightful behavioursees, asit were, the QLB process owing to itsdispositional creativityand
resolvesit into the paradigmatic axis of QLB as a choice and into thesyntagmatic axis of QLB in an order (in terms of initial, medial,
final). Finally, it is realized as the concerned word used in its context.Such usage becomesa posterioria rule in word-formation processes
by ICCCSA.
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
22/112
0KP; (
ll the non-ka:rmik linguistic theoriessuch as
T02 ,@L2 Cog3 0rammar can include
Disposition into their frame/ork
and make them
CA,L *W)B 4 1E', 4E@@ECT
instead of merely
1E', *)!W-
eory o anguage
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
23/112
eory o anguageCreation in KLT from a
Theory of Living $: 1PCEEaterial Plane of !reationEvol$tion E$ation:
A-areness
Ener)*
&$pra%cosmic evelacrocosmic evel
icrocosmic evel
; 7no-s6 as apparentl*transformin) into base s+ectacle?a@x -ed
here the "ase is identical /ith the stem2 "ut although the /ordspectacle e=ists in English it is only the stem of the plural spectaclesthat constitutes the "ase in spectacled
*see Juirk et al $M: $6$-$
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
32/112
Principle of nalogy
+n addition to these three "asic constituents2 /e can include
the principle of analo)*
as a cognitive constituent
in the formation of /ords "y derivation3
(C x%otherap*treatment "y means of = on the analogy *"oth formal
and semantic of a pattern of /ords such as psych-o-therapy9 physi-o-therapy: a pattern or paradigm ofsimilar items "ecomes esta"lished2 and ne/ coinings aremade conforming to this pattern "y derivation.
,TE1 *.!!T ;,E *;,E
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
33/112
,TE1 *.!!T2 ;,E *;,E1!.P)E1E 'D W!.D:
.ELT+!' The relationship "et/een stem *root2 "ase *"asemorpheme and /ord can "e captured "y the follo/inge8uation:
(C &tem/+ord 0ase +ordA@xation/Analo)*
apparentl0 transfor/s into ' &raduall0evolves into ' t#rou t#e process of
This is /ith reference to /ords formed from ste/s asbases*rootsin morphology and bases*base
/orp#e/esaccording to Juirk et al $M: $6%N3
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
34/112
Dispositionaliation of W@PE8uation
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
35/112
The Linguitecture of English W@Ps:Ase of Language
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
36/112
The Linguitecture of English W@Ps:Creation of Language
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
37/112
E'0L+,) W!.D-@!.1T+!'P.!CE,,E,
$3 H=ation
%3 Conversion2
(3 ;ack-formation2 53 ;ack/ords
English 63 .eduplication2 M3 Compounding2W@Ps O3 ;lending
3 Clipping2 3 Dimunitives
$N3 cronym2 $$3 +nitialism $%3 ;orro/ing2 $(3 Cal8ue
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
38/112
H=ation
A@xationis the formation of /ords"y adding derivational aH=es todi
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
39/112
Degrees of Derivation
$3 Qero - degree of derivation is ascri"ed to simple/ords2 i3e3 /ords /hose stem is homonymous/ith a /ord-form and often /ith a root-morpheme2 e3g3 ato/, #aste, devote,etc3
%3 @irst - derived /ords /hose "ases are "uilt onsimple stems and thus are formed "y theapplication of one derivational aH=2 e3g3ato/ic, #ast0, devotion, etc3
(3 ,econd - derived /ords formed "y t/oconsecutive stages of coining2 e3g3 ato/ical,#astil0, devotional,etc3
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
40/112
'et/ork of Derivation
Qero
Degree of Derivation @irst
,econd
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
41/112
Categories of H=es $
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
42/112
Categories of H=es %
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
43/112
,ystem 'et/ork for H=es
ddition:
H=ation Transformation:
Deletion:
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
44/112
Types of ,uH=es
%3 ccording to the part of speech formed suH=es fall intoseveral groups:
a no$n%formin) s$@xes: -age(breaa&e, bonda&e)' -ance-ence(assistance, reference)' -dom(freedo/, in&do/)' -er(teac#er, baer)' -ess(actress, #ostess)' -ing(buildin&, wasin&)'
b adjective%formin) s$@xes: -a"le-i"le-u"le(favourable,incredible, soluble)' %al(for/al, ocial)' -ic(d0na/ic)' -ant-ent(repentant, dependent)'
c n$meral%formin) s$@xes: -fold(twofold)' -teen(fourteen)'-th(sixt#)' -ty(t#irt0)9
d verb%formin) s$@xes: -ate(activate)' -er(&li//er)' -fy-ify(terrif0, specif0)' %ie(/ini/i3e)' -ish(establis#)'
e adverb%formin) s$@xes: -ly(4uicl0, coldl0)' -/ard-/ards(bacward, nort#wards)' -/ise(liewise3
, ti C t i ti f
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
45/112
,emantic Categoriation of,uH=es(3 ,emantically suH=es fall into:
a onosemantic:t#e sux -esshas onlyone meaning 5fe/ale6 ti&ress, tailoress9
aPol*semantic:the suH= -hood hast/o meanings:
$Rcondition or 8uality? 4 false#ood,wo/an#ood9
%Rcollection or group? 4 brot#er#ood.
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
46/112
,uH=ation according toDenotational 1eaning
53 ccording to their generaliing denotationalmeaning suH=es may fall into several groups3E3g32 noun-suH=es fall into those denoting:
a the agent of the action: -er (baer)' -ant(accountant)9
" appurtenance: -an-ian(Victorian, 7ussian)' -ese(C#inese)9
c collectivity: -dom(ocialdo/)' -ry(pleasantr0)9d Diminutiveness:-ie(birdie)' -let(cloudlet)' -ling
(wol8in&)3
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
47/112
Compounding
'oun-noun compound: note "ook S note"ook
ad#ective-nouncompound: "lue "erry S "lue"erry
&er"-nouncompound: /ork room S /orkroom
'oun-ver"compound: "reast feed S "reastfeed
&er"-ver" compound: stir fry S stir -fry
d#ective-ver"compound: high light S highlight
&er"- preposition compound: "reak up S "reakup
preposition-ver"compound: out run S outrun
d#ective-ad#ectivecompound: "itter s/eet S"itters/eet
preposition- preposition compound: in to S into
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
48/112
Conversion
Conversion is the derivational process /here"y an itemchanges its /ord-class /ithout the addition of an aH=*Juirk2 .andolph and 0reen"aum2 $O: 55$3 Thus2 /henthe noun UsignU *$ shifts to the ver"Usign*edU*% /ithoutany change in the /ord form /e can say this is a case of
conversion$3 )o/ever2 it does not mean that this processtakes place in all the cases of homophones *1archand2$O%: %%63 ,ometimes2 the connection has to do /ithcoincidences or old etymological ties that have "een lost33@or e=ample2 UmindU *( and 5 and UmatterU *6 and M are
cases of this grammatical sameness /ithout connection "yconversionVthe ver"s have nothing to do today /ith theirrespective noun forms in terms of semantics *i"id3: %5(3
http://translationjournal.net/journal/31conversion.htmhttp://translationjournal.net/journal/31conversion.htm7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
49/112
Types of Conversion
*.1 Conversion fro/ verb to noun
the nouns Ue=perienceR
UfearR
UfeelR or
UhopeR
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
50/112
Conversion %
2. Conversion fro/ noun to verb
They can e=press the action of putting in or on thenoun:
such as in
pocket*ed *to put into the pocket2 U7lm*ingU *toput into a 7lm and
UpracticeU *(%3
These ver"s can also have the meaning of to
provide /ith *the noun or to give *the noun2 likeUnameU *(( *to give a name to some"ody2 UshapeU*(5 *to give shape to something or Ufuel*sU *(63
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
51/112
Conversion (
* Conversion fro/ ad:ective to verb
d#ectives can also go through the process ofconversion2 especially to ver"s3
De-ad#ectival ver"s get the meaning of to make
*ad#ective. +t can "e easily seen "y means of e=amples like
U"lack*edU *56 *to make "lack2 UopenU *5M2Uslo/*ingU *5O333
+n some cases2 /hen these transitive ver"s are usedintransitively2 a secondary conversion may happen*Juirk2 $O: $6M$-$6M%2 as it /ill "e e=plained lateron3
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
52/112
Conversion 5 - Conversion fro/ a closed cate&or0 to an0 ot#er cate&or0
Closed-class categories can also undergo conversion3 lthough their fre8uency ismuch less common2 the process is not ungrammatical3 ll morphologic categorieshave e=amples of this kind *Cannon2 $6:5%6-5%M3
Prepositions are pro"a"ly the most productive ones3 They can easily "ecomeadver"s2 nouns and ver"s3 This is the case of UupU *5 and 5 and UoutU *(O and 6N3
Conversion to noun may as /ell occur in adver"s like in UoutsideU *6$ and UinsideU*6$9 con#unctions2 as regarded in UifsU *6% and U"utsU *6%9
inter#ections and non-le=ical items2 like Uho ho hoUsU *6( and Uha ha haU *659 aH=essuch as Umini-U *66 can appear as noun *6M and proper noun *663333
Conversion to ver" is fre8uent in onomatopoeic e=pressions like U"uU *6O2 U"eepU*6O or U/oo*ingU *63 @inally2 phrase compounds can appear as ad#ectives2 suchas in U"orro/-the-mo/erU *62 Udo/n-to-earthU *MN or Uno/-it-can-"e-toldU *M$3
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
53/112
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
54/112
Partial Conversion
1 Conversion fro/ noun to ad:ective
U1ahogany music "o=U can "e used inan attri"utive /ay2 the music "o= is
mahogany3 This implies UmahoganyUis a denominal ad#ective3
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
55/112
Partial Conversion %
2 Conversion fro/ ad:ective to noun
d#ectives can also shift into nouns2though it is not very fre8uent3 +t
mainly happens in /ell-esta"lishedpatterns of ad#ective plus nounphrase3 'ominalisation occurs /hen
the noun is elided and the ad#ectiveis /idely used as a synonym of ane=isting set pattern3
This could "e the case of Ua Chinese
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
56/112
.eduplication
.eduplication is a linguistic form /hichcontains systematic non-recursive repetitionof phonological material for morphological orle=ical purposes3
$3$ @orm$3$3$ @ull and partial reduplication
$3$3% .eduplicant position
$3$3( Copying direction
$3$35 .eduplication and other morphologicalprocesses
$3$36 Phonological processes2 environment2 and
reduplicant-"ase relations
. d li i i E li h
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplication7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
57/112
.eduplication in English English has several types of reduplication2 ranging from informal e=pressive voca"ulary *the 7rst four forms "elo/ to grammatically meaningful
forms *the last t/o "elo/3
8h*min) red$plication: hokey-pokey2 rale-dale2 super-duper2 "oogie-/oogie2 teenie-/eenie2 /alkie-talkie2 hoity-toity2 /ingding2 ragtag3 lthoughat 7rst glance G
Exact red$plications*"a"y-talk-like: "ye-"ye2 choo-choo2 night-night2 no-no2 pee-pee2 poo-poo3 Couscous is not an English e=ample for reduplication2since it is taken from a @rench /ord /hich has a 1aghre"iorigin3
Abla$tred$plications: "ric-a-"rac2 chit-chat2 criss-cross2 ding-dong2 #i""er-#a""er2 kitty-cat2 knick-knack2 pitter-patter2 splish-splash2 ig-ag2 >im>am3+n the a"laut reduplications2 the 7rst vo/el is almost al/ays a high vo/el
and the reduplicated a"laut variant of the vo/el is a lo/ vo/el3
&hm%red$plicationcan "e used /ith most any /ord9 e3g3 bab0%s#/ab02 cancer%sc#/ancerand fanc0%sc#/anc03
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maghrebihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ablauthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_vowelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_vowelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shm-reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shm-reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shm-reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shm-reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_vowelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_vowelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ablauthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maghrebi7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
58/112
.eduplication %
!omparativered$plication:
+n the sentence ohnUs apple looked redder and redder2 the reduplication ofthe comparativeindicates that the comparative is "ecoming more true over
time2 meaning roughly ohnUs apple looked progressively redder as time /enton3 +n particular2 this construction does notmean that ohnUs apple is redderthan some other apple2 /hich /ould "e a possi"le interpretation in thea"sence of reduplication2 e3g3 in ohnUs apple looked redder3
!ontrastive foc$s red$plication:
E=act reduplication can "e used /ith contrastive focus *generally /here the7rst noun is stressed to indicate a literal2 as opposed to 7gurative2 e=ampleof a noun2 or perhaps a sort of Platonic idealof the noun2 as in
+s that carrot cheesecake or carrot CKE-cakeX3(This is similar to the@innish use mentioned "elo/3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparativehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparativehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrastive_focus_reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_(linguistics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platonic_idealismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platonic_idealismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_(linguistics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrastive_focus_reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparativehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
59/112
8ed$plicant Position =
8ed$plicant position
.eduplication may "e initial*i3e3 pre7=al2 +nal*i3e3 suH=al2or internal*i3e3 in7=al2 e3g3
#nitialreduplication in gta(CV% pre+x):
YuZa"UafternoonUSYuYuZa"Ulate afternoonU*;u-YuZa" [a[a#Ua longtimeUS[a[a[a#Ua long time *in yearsU*?@)
inalreduplication in Dakota(%CCV sux):
h\skaUtall *singularUSh\skaskaUtall *pluralU*h\ska-sa /a]teUgood*singularUS/a]te]teUgood *pluralU*/a]te-Ate(B#aw 1>@, arant3 1>2,lbrit 2@@2)
#nternalreduplication in ,amoan(%CV% in+x):
savaliUheshe /alksU *singularSsavavaliUthey /alkU *plural*sa-va-vali alofaUheshe lovesU *singularSalolofaUthey loveU *plural*a-lo-lofa(oravcsi 1>, Froselow and cCart#0 1>-) le ta/aloaUthe manU*singular$Sta/aloloaUmenU *plural*tama-lo-loa+nternal reduplication ismuch less common than the initial and 7nal types3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefix_(linguistics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffixhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infixhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeta_peopleshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakota_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samoan_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samoan_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakota_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeta_peopleshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infixhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffixhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefix_(linguistics)7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
60/112
,)!.TE'+'0 *Dimunitives
01 shorteningis the formation of a /ord"y cutting o< a part of the /ord3a initial*or aphesis:fend (v) G defend,
p#one G telep#one9
b medial*orsyncope: specs G spectacles,fanc0 G fantas0'
c Fnal*or apocope: lab laborator0, exa/ exa/ination9
d both initial and Fnal:8u G in8uen3a,frid&e G refri&erator'3
1 ti ti i 0 ti 0
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
61/112
1otivation in 0enerative 0rammar$
$3 0enetic +nheritance
!nly the )ard/are "ut not the ,oft/are
^ the &ocal !rgan ^ nalyticity
^ Disposition at ;irth
'ot^ .ALE, !@
L'0A0E
1 ti ti i 0 ti 0
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
62/112
1otivation in 0enerative 0rammar%
%3 AT!'!1B and L'0A0E,PEC+@+C+TB
^ .ules are Products of 0eneralCognitive
"ilities
^ They are P!,TE.+!.+
'ot
1otivation in 0enerative 0rammar
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
63/112
1otivation in 0enerative 0rammar(
(3 +nternal Linguistic Evidence
^ JL; in Telugu
^ ;ack/ords in English
^ .eduplication
^ ;lends
1otivation in @unctional Linguistics
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
64/112
1otivation in @unctional Linguistics$
$3 Language is as it is "ecause of /hatit does
*in the functional sense*X)alliday
%3 Language is as it is '!T "ecause of/hat it does
;AT
"ecause of /hat it is +'TE'DED to do/hat it does *in all senses:
;huvanes/ar
1otivation in @unctional Linguistics
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
65/112
1otivation in @unctional Linguistics%
$3 lternative Ways of ,aying the,ame Thing
*'ot
clear
%3 ,ynonymy
,end gain &s.esend
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
66/112
1otivation in Cognitive Linguistics $
$3 C)!+CE in Cognition *'otmotivated
%3 Cognition is !'LB +nstrumental
(3 Cognition is '!T gential
K ik[C ti Lii L ]
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
67/112
Ka:rmik [Creation-Living-Language]:Universal Sciences of Action-Living-Lingual Action
Ka:rmik Creation Programme : A, ction
Ka:rmik Living Programme: A, Living
1anifest
Ka:rmik Language Programme: A, Lingual ction Anmanifest
@undamental Types of Language
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
68/112
@undamental Types of Language
"at$ral orm GOriented an)$a)e:
"//anent "ntelli&ence in Nature is t#e Creator
!+eech "at$ral
"ame%Oriented : 8oot an)s. &i)n
an)$a)es
"//anent "ntelli&ence in ArtiFcial
Disposition is t#e Creator
Transformed : Parent G Da$)hterH. an)s. an)$a)e amilies
Di5$sion of in).Patterns
:
'ature of Language
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
69/112
'ature of Language@ormation
Creation: Cause: D@P
1odi7cation: Causes:
'ature of +nternal: Novelt0, Has#ion
Language Disposition
@ormation Change E=ternal:nalo&0,Forrowin&
Transformation: Causes:
;iological Drift
Dispositional:
,hift
'et/orks 4 /ithin 4
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
70/112
'et/orks 4 /ithin 4'et/orks
'et/ork $
,u"-'et/ork i_33n
`
'et/ork ( 'et/ork %
,u"-'et/ork i_33n ,u"-'et/ork i_33n
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
71/112
PE&
The Principles of Exploration ofVariables
(PEV
E!V PEV !"V !"V(D
EC& Exploration of Contextual Variables
PE& Productive Extension of Variables C'& Creation of New Variables
CNV(D) Deletion of Variables
English W@P Principles
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
72/112
English W@P Principles
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
73/112
3/1/16
)olarchy of Ka:rmik .eality
Dispositional .eality *K3 .
Cognitive .eality D3.3 * K3 .
,ocioculturalspiritual.eality
C3 .3 * D3 .3 * K3.3
Ka:rmik .eality Conte=tual ctional .3
,C,3 . * C3 .3 *D3.3 * K3 .3
1ental ction ctional .eality
&ocal ction
Construction of Ka:rmik .eality viaDi iti l . lit
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
74/112
Dispositional .eality
Ka:rmik .eality is constructed in a Pentastratal '-/-'
@rame/ork3K3.3 D3 .3 Cog3 . ,C, . C3 .3 3 .
;ut Dispositional .eality 0C,D1s Cognitive -,C,-C-.ealities3 +n other /ords2
ction is dispositional-cognitive- socioculturalspiritual-
conte=tual actional- action !. ction is dispositionally cognied as socioculturalspiritual-
conte=tual actional-action3
2ence( D!P"!T"#$L &"3#T"# +lays the criticalrole in the &'E$T"#( M"D)&$T"#( $#D
T'$#!)"'M$T"# ") L$#34$3E # T! 5$'ET%-'$#3E-DEPT21 Each and every as+ect of language is
6uali7ed 8y
Dis+osition that colours cognition and rules su+reme1
Disposition and Language C-P--T-.-PD-D or
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
75/112
for short CPT
ccording to KLT2 language is 0C,D1ed "yDisposition3 +f this is true2 then the role ofdisposition should "e evident in the
Creation
Production pplication
Transmission
.etention Perpetuation
Decay leading to Death
of Language
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
76/112
CPT of W@P
Words can "e analyed in terms of
Process
,ylla"le ,tructure
;ase 4 ,tem 4 Wordas t#e0 are created
modi7ed
varietytransformed
in t#eir range
depth of linguistic operations
KLT 1otivation $ of Creation of W@Ps
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
77/112
KLT 1otivation $ of Creation of W@Ps
When a /ord is created2 it is created
"y aParticular Process
in a
Particular ,ylla"le ,tructure
#avin& a
Particular ;ase-,tem-Word "y
dispositional c#oices
of the ndividual9&ollective
Creation of W@Ps: KLT 1otivation
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
78/112
Creation of W@Ps: KLT 1otivation
;y o"serving ho/ /ords are formed
"y direct evidence w#en it is available in
t#e for/ of interviews,
4uestionnaires, written records Ie will be able to now t#e role of
disposition
J7 w#en suc# direct evidence is notavailable
Ie can +nd t#e role of disposition b0
Eect%to%eans%to%Cause o&ic and Levels of .easoning$ ti l . lit . i t t t f i t th l l l f
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
79/112
$3 ctional .eality .easoning: /e get t/o types of reasoning at the lo/er level ofaction as the
e5ect(W2$T:aterial orm:
$3 $3 +ndividual action-oriented .easoning: "duction
$3 %3 Collective action-oriented .easoning: !omprehensive#nd$ction6
LMettin& t#e /axi/u/ nu/ber of cate&ories, t0pesclassesO
&orollary: W)Ps are o+en-ended 8ut limited1
Deduction *for checking
%3 Dispositional .eality .easoning: /e get one type of reasoning at the middle level
of choiceof action as themeans(2"W:Pattern and &tr$ct$re: Transd$ction
L"nferrin& a #ier level abstraction of subtle PBs fro/ an overview of t#e &rosst0pes and patterns networ reali3ed in /aterial for/, i.e., discoverin& principlesand concepts fro/ t#e PB data and developin& s0ste/ic c#oice networs for t#es0ste/O
(3 Ka:rmik .eality .easoning: We get one type of reasoning at the higher level of
e=perienceof action as the
ca$se(W2%: !oncept for orm or $nction/
Experience of the 8es$lts of Action : 7a:rmi3%o%d$ction
;otivatin) s*stemic choices from disposition and motivatin) lan)$a)e asa dispositional socio%co)nitive lin)$istic s*stem (i.e., a 3a:rmi3 s*stem
Actional Reality Reasoning:1. Induction - 2. Deduction - 3. Abduction
Induction 1: Example from Non-Linguistic Reality
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
80/112
allo/s inferring from 2 /here does not follo/necessarily from 9 might give us very good
reason to accept 2 "ut it does not ensure truth3
@or e=ample2 if all s/ans that /e haveo"served so far are /hite2 /e may
induce that the possi"ility that all s/ans
are /hite is reasona"le3 We have goodreason to "elieve the conclusion fromthe premise2 "ut the truth of the
conclusion is not guaranteed3
*+ndeed2 itturns out
that
somes/ans
are
Induction-Deduction-Abduction -Transduction VsKa:rmik-o-duction
Induction 2 : Example from Word-formation Processes
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
81/112
allo/s inferring from 2 /here does not follo/necessarily from 9 might give us very good
reason to accept 2 "ut it does not ensure truth3
For example, if all the English affixationprocesses that we have observed so far arepre-fixation and suffixation processes, wemay induce that the possibility that allwords are formed by pre-fixation and
suffixation is reasonable. We have goodreason to believe the conclusion from thepremise, but the truth of the conclusion isnot guaranteed. Moreover, induction cannotmotivate WFPs since they are open ended
and dispositionally creative.
+ndeed2 itturns out
that inEnglish
some
aH=es
Induction-Deduction-Abduction -Transduction Vs Ka:rmik-o-ductionComprehensive Induction 3 : Example from WFPs
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
82/112
allo/s inferring from 2 /here does not follo/necessarily from 9 might give us very good
reason to accept "ecause of the comprehensivedata2 "ut it does not ensure truth3 +t is "etter
than simple induction3
For example, if all the English affixesthat we have observed so far are 8:pre-fix, suffix, suffixoid, circumfix,interfix, duplifix, simulfix, suprafix,
we may induce that the possibility that allwords are formed by these affixes isreasonable. We have good reason to believethe conclusion from the premise, but thetruth of the conclusion is not guaranteedsince they are open ended and
dispositionally creative; henceinduction cannot motivate WFPs
+ndeed2 it
turns out
that inEnglish
some aH=es
Actional Reality Reasoning II: Deduction
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
83/112
y g
Deduction $ : E=ample from
'on-Linguistic World
allo/s
deriving from only/here is a formal
logical conse8uenceof 3+n other /ords2
deduction derives theconse8uences of the
assumed3 0iven thetruth of the
assumptions2 a validdeduction guarantees
the truth of
the conclusion3
Hor exa/ple, &ivent#at all bac#elors
are un/arried/ales, and &iven
t#at t#is person is abac#elor, one candeduce t#at t#is
person is an
un/arried /ale3
Induction-Deduction-Abduction -Transduction VsKa:rmik-o-duction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequencehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
84/112
Ka:rmik-o-duction
Deduction %: E=ample from Language
allo/sderiving from only/here is a formal
logical conse8uenceof 3 +n other /ords2
deduction derives theconse8uences of the
assumed3 0iven thetruth of theassumptions2 a valid
deduction guarantees
the truth of
the conclusion3
For example, given that indimunitiona part of the
word is cut, and given that thewordphoneis formed by
cutting a part of the wordtele-fromtelephone,one candeduce that this word is adimunitive.However,
deduction is of little use in
motivating word-formationprocesses but it can be usedto test how a word is
formed according to thealready known
WFPs.
ActionalRealityReasoningIII:"duction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequencehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
85/112
Actional Reality Reasoning III:"duction
The American philosopherCharles Sanders Peirce(18391914) firstintroduced the term as "guessing".[7]Peirce said that toabducea hypotheticalexplanation from an observed circumstance is to surmise that may be true
because then would be a matter of course.[8]Thus, to abduce from involves
determining that issufficient, but not necessary, for .
For example, suppose we observe thatthe lawn is wet. Ifit rained last night, then it wouldbe unsurprising thatthe lawn is wet. Therefore, by abductive reasoning, the possibilitythatit rained last nightis reasonable (but note that Peirce did not remain convinced that asingle logical form covers all abduction);[9]however, some other process may have also
resulted in a wet lawn, e.g. dew or lawn sprinklers. Moreover, abducing thatit rained lastnightfrom the observation of a wet lawn can lead to false conclusion(s).
Peirce argues that good abductive reasoning fromPtoQinvolves not simply adetermination thatQis sufficient forP, but also thatQis among the
most economical explanationsforP. Simplification and economy both call for that "leap"of abduction.[$N
"duction: E=ample from W@P
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Sanders_Peircehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessary_and_sufficient_conditionshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razorhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razorhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessary_and_sufficient_conditionshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Sanders_Peirce7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
86/112
For example, suppose we hear words such assyringe- syringes; edit editor, etc. Wealready know that most of the plural forms or noun-forms of words in English areformed from their singular counter parts or verb counter parts. So, it would beunsurprising to know that words such asdogs and playerare formed likewise.Therefore, by abductive reasoning, the possibility that syringes and editor are alsoformed like that is reasonable (but note that Peirce did not remain convinced that asingle logical form covers all abduction);[9]however, some other process may have also
resulted in syringes and editor, e.g. borrowing. Moreover, abducing thatsyringes andeditorfrom the observation of dogs and player, etc. leads to false conclusion(s).
Peirce argues that good abductive reasoning fromPtoQinvolves not simply adetermination thatQis sufficient forP, but also thatQis among the
most economical explanationsforP. Simplification and economy both call for that "leap"of abduction. However, simplification and economy in the case of these words may not beof use because the process is not economic:dog-to-dogsandplay-to-playeris not
economical since it involves addition of a suffixs/-er.What is required is the inclusionof dispositionalsuffixal additivecognition of these words and the resulting WFP byICCCSA. In the case ofeditor/ syringes, it is thesuffixal clippingcognition. Hence
abduction fails in providing a principled account of WFPs.[$N
%3 Dispositional .eality .easoningTransduction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razorhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoninghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razorhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoning7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
87/112
!ransduction % a ter/ coined b0 /e % is a process of reasonin&
t#at leads to t#e inference of choices and dis+osition in
patterns$
!#ere is disposition, if t#ere is c#oice Jr
!#ere is c#oice, if t#ere is disposition.
1 a. !#ere is c#oice (in patternin&), if t#ere are dierent
patterns (N, if B) or
1 b. !#ere are dierent patterns, if t#ere is c#oice.
(B, if N)
2 a. !#ere is disposition, if t#ere is dispositional bias and
t#ere is dispositional bias, if t#ere is response bias'
2 b. !#ere is c#oice , if t#ere is response bias' and t#ere is
response bias, if t#ere is c#oice.
%3 Dispositional .eality .easoningTransduction
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
88/112
Patterns are interpreted at a /ore a8stractlevel b0 t#eir anal0sis as
means 2"W;atthe middle level or level around1
2
overview$ "denti+cation 1 *
!op View $ Jbservation
n -
Bide View$ nal0sis
Fotto/ View$ "nterpretation ?
L1Qn are IHPs or sub%IHPs' C%4%D as t#e cause' circu/ference ast#e lin&uistic reali3ation
Ltrans R across' ducere duct R lead' leadin& across dierent structures to t0pesof patterns to dierent processes to arrive at an inference:
%3 Dispositional .eality .easoning
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
89/112
%3 Dispositional .eality .easoningTransduction
01 f the +atterns of a W)P are varia8le( thenthey can 8e created 8y +ermutations of
varia8les1
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
90/112
Transduction of English W@P Principles
Transduction
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
91/112
$3 +n /ord-formation processes2 there aredi
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
92/112
Dis+ositional Discrete Permutation Princi+leof Bhuvanes=ar;
SI#en we live, we lan&ua&e t#eworld (in its experience) b0
i/ited Tses of i/ited eans
wit#in(Tn)li/ited (open%ended)Per/utations.U
Jr si/pl0
>limited uses of limited means inunlimited +ermutations?
Chilukuri ;huvanes/ar
Ka:rmikoduction
Ka:rmikoduction is a kind of reasoning that leads to the inference of KP; through language
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
93/112
Ka:rmikoduction is a kind of reasoning that leads to the inference of KP; through language3Comprehensive induction2 and transduction esta"lish choice and disposition in the formation of language3Ka9rmikoduction esta"lishes the function of language3
$3 +f there is CC!2 then there is language
!r There is language2 if there is C *C !3
%3 +f there is action2 then there are results3 !r +f there are results2 then there is action3
(3 +f there are .!2 then there is e=perience3 !r There are .!2 if there is e=perience3 E=cept ,aints
G+f there is CC! *"y language2 then there is the e=perience of the .!3 )ence2 language is used as a toolas a system as a resource as a means for KP; for ordinary humans "y humans or saints3
!r2 There is KP;2 if there is CC! *"y language3
Therefore2 language and living are +-+-+3 this is in creation itself as a principle3 This indirectly o
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
94/112
Ka:rmik-o-duceis to multiply induce from empirical experience assertions
[which are refined by logical andscientific experienceof the defects of under-extension,
over-extension, and impossibility and whet them against, if necessary,spiritual(introspective) experiences ]
to arrive atcausalexplanations in terms of process (WHY: CAUSE), pattern (HOW:TIME-PLACE-MANNER) and structure (WHAT: MATERIAL FORM) at the
highest level, to show that the linguistic realizations are constructed and used in acontext to CCOA for constructing ka:rmik reality via dispositional reality via
actional reality.
Ka:rmikoduction
is causal, radialreasoning:
looking from multipleangles, such as sensoryperceptive evidence,inference, analogy, presence
and absence of a quality anddifferent types of reasoningsuch as abduction,
induction, deduction, andtransduction(
ande@+erien
ce toascertaina fact1
Ka:rmikoducing W@P Creation
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
95/112
Ka:rmikoducing W@P CreationKa:rmikoduction
leading through cause-e
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
96/112
+llustration of KLT in W@Ps
+n the ne=t section2 aH=ation is takenas an e=ample to illustrate ho/disposition 0C,D1s this su"-/ord-
formation process3
Affixation as Evidence for KLT ProcedureforKLTAnalysisofAffixation
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
97/112
Procedure for KLT Analysis of Affixation
1. Data Collection:A number of words from different languages such asEnglish, Telugu, Hebrew, Philippines, Arabic, Maltese, and Alabama have been
collected. 2. Patterning and Structuring:The data has been analyzed (see slides 35-36),and from the analysis, we find that there are many affixation processes (11)available across languages: 1. Prefixation; 2. Suffixation; 3. Semi-Suffixation; 4.Infixation; 5. Circumfixation; 6. Interfixation; 7. Duplifixation; 8. Transfixation;9. Simulfixation; 10. Suprafixation; 11. Disfixation. 12. Quotefixation (Recently,
this new affixation process by quotefix in written Telugu journalism has beenformed). In all 12 Affixation Sub-WFPs are observed.
3. Concepts and Principles:From an abstraction of concepts and principlesfrom these affixation processes, we find three important principles involved inthese processes:
1. addition; Concepts & 2. transformation;
Principles 3. deletion;
4. bifurcation by quotes
Affixation as Evidence for KLT 2
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
98/112
53 ,ystemic 'et/ork for H=ation
Prefixation Suffixation Suffixation
Circumfixation Semi-Suffixation
Addition
(Infixation)Systemic Network Infixation Interfixation
for Affixation (English) (Transfixation)
Simulfixation
Transformation
Suprafixation
Disfixation Deletion
Quotefixation Truncation
Dispositional Conceptualization of the System as aNetwork
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
99/112
NetworkIn KLT, ka:rmik reality isa:nushangikally (the effect inheriting the cause in addition to itsown property)constructed through dispositional reality through actional reality:
Ka:rmik Reality Dispositional Reality (+K.R)
Actional Reality (+D.R. +K.R.)
The actional realitythat is construed is dispositionally construed as
dispositional actional realitywhich is further construed as
ka:rmik dispositional actional reality.
In the case ofAffixation in English, the mathematical principles ofaddition, andtransformationonlyare chosen for affixation by dispositional cognition. Whatit means is that the English people have not cognized other principles but only
these two and hence only these two principles are usedso farfrom the US Actionvia US Lingual Action.
5. Motivation of Affixation as a Ka:rmik Linguistic System
51ChoiceofAffixationasaWFP
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
100/112
5. 1. Choice of Affixation as a WFP
Historically, Old, Middle, and Modern Englishes have been influencedby French, Latin and Greek which opted for affixation as a WFP. Hence,
English might have thesuper-stratum effectof those languages.5. 2. PEV in Modern EnglishIf we observe how the affixation process in Mod. English hasexpanded, we see direct evidence for dispositional creativity in thecognition of these processes.
Many of these processes have been added to the main principle ofaffixation by the Principle of Exploration of Variables. For example,infixationis still not very productive;duplifixationentered English
recently via Hebrew;
Ka:rmikopoeisis $:
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
101/112
Disposition
Ka:rmikopoeisis %: E8uations of
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
102/112
ction
*$ Disposition DesireE
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
103/112
Conduct of ction
+ntuitive Anderstanding of a Phenomenon
Trou"leshooting
Pro"lem ,olving ,trategies
+nnovative ction 0o
to E&
,olution
W@P C!0'E1E C!0'+T+!' 'ETW!.K
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
104/112
W@P C!0'E1E C!0'+T+!' 'ETW!.K
"et-or3 =. Experiential eanin) !ha3ram:a O$ter !ha3ram6 b Titled #nner !ha3ram
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
105/112
a. O$ter !ha3ram6 b. Titled #nner !ha3ram
+CCC, 'et/ork
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
106/112
+CCC, 'et/ork
'-/-' Diagram of Ka:rmik
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
107/112
.eality
3 .
C3 .
,C,3 .
D3 .
Co .
)olarchy of Ka:rmik .eality
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
108/112
3/1/16
)olarchy of Ka:rmik .eality
Dispositional .eality *K3 .
Cognitive .eality D3.3 * K3 .
,ocioculturalspiritual
.eality C3 .3 * D3 .3 * K3
.3 Ka:rmik .eality Conte=tual ctional .3 ,C,3 . * C3 .3 *D3
.3 * K3 .3
1ental ction ctional .eality
&ocal ction
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
109/112
[backwordsis a new process in English;
blendingis a recent phenomenon and isproductive;reductionprocesses such asabbreviation, clipping, acronomy, and
initialismare all recent developments.Let us take the case ofbackwords,
acronomy, duplifixation, and portmanteaus
to illustrate how language is created,modified, and transformed by dispositionalGCSDM of these processes and their
instantiation in words
6 C!'CLA,+!'
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
110/112
63 C!'CLA,+!'
$3 We have provided a linguistic motivation ofW@Ps in English in the @ormal2 @unctional2
Cognitive2 and Ka:rmik Linguistic 1odels3
%3 The nalysis sho/s evidence forE=ploration of &aria"les2 'et/orks-/ithin-'et/orks3
(3 W@P are created in an Ka:rmikopoeitic,tructure3
Thank you
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
111/112
Thank you
T2A"7 IOJ VE8I J!2 O8 IOJ8
7#"D ATTE"T#O"K
KLT Procedure
7/24/2019 Post Amrit Linguitecture WFP1
112/112
1. 2. K! Procedure
"t consists of t#ree divisions$ 1. Pre%an&ua&e' 2. t an&ua&e' *. Post%an&ua&e
+n practice2 KLT is applied "y starting /ith %3 t 4 Language ,tage /ith a small revie/ ofpproaches to Living as follo/s in 5 stages and then Post-language at the 6 th,tage3 Within the 6th
,tage2 the 7rst stage Pre-Language is discussed3
4. Approaches to ivin): 1. Di5erent Approaches6 . 7A:8#7 #V#"9 APP8OA!2: 1.7a:rmi3 ivin) Pro)ramme6 . The 9ame of 7armaphalabho:)am (97P0
1. +rst2 "y data collection :
(/hich gives us the W)T of language in 8uestion for analysis9
2. second,patternin) and str$ct$rin)the data into clearly identi7a"le categories2 types2 andclasses */hich gives the )!W of language in terms of its !rganiation9
*. t#ird2 discovering concepts and principlesfrom the patterned and structured data
*/hich gives the )!W of language in terms of its Principles for !rganiation9
-. fourt#2 developing s*stemic choice net-or3sfor the system
*/hich gives the )!W of language in terms of its Dispositional Conceptualiation9 and
. +ft#,motivating systemic choices from disposition and "uilding up the lan)$a)e as adispositional socioco)nitive lin)$istic s*stem
Recommended