View
65
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
PORTS AND HARBOUR ENGINNERING. PRIVATIZATION AND FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF PORTS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Process of Study. The Manila Meeting focused on laws and regulations related to private investment. (BOT, PPI, PFI, Port Privatization Law) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
PORTS AND HARBOUR ENGINNERING
PRIVATIZATION AND FINANCIAL ASPECTSOF PORTS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
2
Process of StudyThe Manila Meeting focused on laws and regulations related to private investment. (BOT, PPI, PFI, Port Privatization Law)
At the Brisbane Meeting, we explained the standard terms and contents in concessions and /or contracts for private investment in ports.
The Singapore Meeting was cancelled.
This time we will examine the recent situation of PSP in the development and operations of ports based on results of questionnaires and discuss how to introduce PSP to the development and management of ports.
3
Presentation Points
1. Finance System For Port Infrastructure 2. PSP in Terminal Operation 3. Regulation on Private Investment4. Recent Movement of PSP in Ports5. Remarks for PSP in Ports
4
Sampling Study of World Terminals
Australia 1 El Salvador 1 Philippines 2Bangladesh 2 Estonia 1 Syria 2
Brunei 1 Indonesia 3 Taiwan 2Cambodia 1 Iran 1 Thailand 1Canada 1 Japan 2 Tonga 1China 1 New Zeeland 1 USA 1Egypt 2 Peru 1 Vietnam 2
5
Ownership of Terminal
0%10%
20%30%40%50%
60%70%80%
90%100%
land owner terminal owner
private
both
public
6
Finance System for Port Infrastructure
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
channeldredging.
berth const. yard const. h'dlingequpment
inst.
private
both
public
7
Finance System For Port Infrastructure
DIRECT REVENUE
INDIRECT BENEFIT
PUBLIC WORK COMMERCIALFINANCE
DEVELOPMENTFINANCE
RE
PA
YM
EN
TB
Y T
AX
RE
PA
YM
EN
TB
Y R
EV
EN
UE
BREAK WATERNAVIGATION CHANNEL
QUAY & WHARF RECLAMATION
CRANE WAREHOUSEHANDLING EQUIPMENT
8
Private Sector Participation in Port Operation
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
mantainacedredging
tug/ Pilot Terminaloperation
privatebothpublic
9
Private Sector Participation in Terminal Operation (1)
2. Joint Venture (Companies pool resources to share risks. Management company can be a fully owned subsidiary of PMB)
1. Joint Operation (PMB maintains the employment of his workers and takes advantage of the efficiency of private companies )
10
3. Lease Lease holder takes operation risks.
4. Concession (superstructure and cargo handling) Concessionaire has rights to finance, build and
operation
Private Sector Participation in Terminal Operation
5. BOT (including infrastructure development)
After the limited period of time, the facility and its
equipment will be transferred free of charge to the
grantor
11
Feature of PSP in Terminal Operation
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
J O J V Lease Consession BOT
12
Contract Term
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
less than5
5years 10years 20years 25years 30yeas morethan 50
13
Build Operate Transfer LawRepublic Act No.7718 of 1994 in Philippines
Malaysia’s Port (Privatization) Act of 1990 (Act 422)
Korean Act 5654 on Private Participation in Infrastructure of 1998
Examples of Laws on Private Investment
14
Privatization Movement In Thailand
2) In Leam Chabang port, PAT prepared infrastructures including facilities of Terminal B1-B4 and leases them to the private sector.
3) B5 terminal was developed by the BOT methodincluding berth construction.
1) The old Bangkok port has been operated as a service port using personnel of PAT.
4) Privatization of PAT itself is underway despite protests from the labor union
15
Japanese Examples for PSP1. Enforcement of the PFI Law (Sept. 1999) Cargo handling facilities at container terminals Low interest loan by DBJ Exemption of the special land ownership tax
2. Effective Port Management Scheme (Dec. 2002)
Provision of Public Berths to Private Sector Long-term Concession Effective Operation and Flexible Tariff Setting by Private Sector
16
Gantry Crane
Transfer Crane
Yard
PFI Project Promoter
Public Use
Constructed by the public(State)→Controlled by P.M.B committed by the State
P.M.BConstructed by the public
Wharf
Control House
PFI
17
Image
25years ( after inauguration)
Kitakyshu Port Hibiki Container Terminal Construction and Operation Project
18
Utilization License (Yard: per 1 year, Wharf: per 12 hours)
Long-term (30 years) Contract (Lease/Concession)
Utilization License from Public Sector Lease from Public Sector
CompanyB
CompanyC
Port Administration Building
CompanyA
Shipping CompanyY
Shipping CompanyZ
事業者
CFSowned by B and C
Contract
(Current) (Future)Port Management by Private Sector
Comprehensive Operation by Private Sector
Constructed by Private Sector
Contract
CompanyC
CompanyB
Warehouse owned by A
Warehouse owned by B
CompanyA
Shipping CompanyY
Shipping CompanyZ
Contract
CFS
Port Management by Public Sector
Conceptual Image of Effective Port Operation
19
Basic Port Management Models
Infrastructure Superstructure Port Labor Other FunctionsPublic Service Port Public Public Public Majority PublicTool Port Public Public Private Public/ PrivateLandload Port Public Private Private Public/ PrivatePrivate Service Port Private Private Private Majority Private
20
Strong and Weak Points of Port Management Models
(Public Service Port)
Strength:•Unity of Command
Weakness:
Labor Problems•Lack of Internal Competition•Lack of innovation
21
Strong and Weak Points of Port Management Models (Fully Privatized Port)
Strength: Maximum Flexibility of Investments and Port Operations No Direct Government Interference Market Oriented Port Development and Tariff Policies. High Price for the Sale of Port Land Weakness: Monopolistic Behavior Lack of Economic and Regional Development Policy Considerable Amounts of money is necessary to buy back
the port land Serious Risk of Speculation with port land by private
owners.
22
Conditions for Successful Privatization
• Access to the international trade route• Sufficient traffic – sufficient revenue• Profit with sufficient safety margin• Stable economy with less government
intervention
23
Fear and Expectation• Public
– If no applicant appears?– Operator generates
enough revenue?– Operator operates
efficiently?– Operator helps
development of economy?
– Can avoid monopoly situation?
• Private– Is government
regulation too strict or not transparent?
– Any risk involved in the contract:- stability of social, economic and regulatory rules?
– Sufficient traffic guaranteed?
AUTHOR
ITY
COMPANY
24
Which is Profitable?
$$
Privateoperator
Port authority
25
Thank for your attention !
Recommended