View
230
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
1/23
1
ACADEMY OF HEALTH SCIENCES M PNFX7101DEPARTMENT OF PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES 0508
NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL, CHEMICAL SCIENCES BRANCH
Radiation Safety Briefing
REFERENCES:
Hall, Eric J.; Radiobiology for the Radiologist, 5th ed., Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, 2000
AR 11-9, The Army Radiation Safety Program, 28 May, 1999TB MED 521, Management and Control of Diagnostic X-ray, Therapeutic X-ray and Gamma-
beam Equipment, June 1981
TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE:
Identify the potential radiation hazards in diagnostic radiology and the precautionsnecessary to maintain exposures as low as reasonably achievable as well as describe
recommended measures to maintain total fitness.
ENABLING LEARNING OBJECTIVE:
1. Given a DD 1952, properly complete the Dosimeter Application IAW AR 11-9.
2. Given a list of radiation effects, select the statement which describes that effect IAW Hall.
3. Given a list of statements about radiation protection, select the statement whichdescribes the as-low-as-reasonably-achievable (ALARA) concept IAW AR 11-9.
NOTES
A. DD Form 1952, Dosimeter Application and Record of Occupational Radiation Exposure
1. For the X-ray survey class, complete cells indicated in Figure 1 (left). Under pay grade,civilians should either Check the box or print CIV In the box. For military, print yourgrade (e.g., E-5, O-2). Include the address to send the dosimetery results to, for moststudents, this will be the address of the office where dosimetry results are maintained oryour office address. Turn over form to sign.
2. On the reverse, review the Privacy Act. The only item of concern is the Social SecurityNumber. This number is used to uniquely identify the wearer. For non-US residentswithout an SSN, another unique identifier (e.g., passport number, Social Insurance
Number, etc.) is used. The birthdate is not Privacy Act data, it is used to verify that theapplicant is older than 18 years of age.
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
2/23
M PNFX70508
Figure
B. Biolo
1.b
a
b
101
1. DD 195
gical Effect
hen ionizinody, it randillions of ce
. For the cthe radiatthrough a
. If a cell is
may be cdamagedpossibleradiation
(1) RepaiThis ienco
2, Dosimete
of Ionizing
g radiationmly hits or
lls.
lls which arion simply pnd no harm
hit directly,
ompletely ki. Some of tesults frominteractions
r - the damthe norma
ntered in th
r Applicatio
Radiation
trikes theisses
e not hit,assesis done.
the cell
lled or justecellularinclude:
ged cell cal outcome fe workplace
2
and Recor
repair itselr low doses.
Fi
d of Occup
lf so no perof low LET
ure 2. Pos
tional Radi
anent damradiation co
sible Radiat
tion Expos
age is causmmonly
ion Effects
re
ed.
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
3/23
c
d
2. I
ep
trodl
v
a
b
c
(2) Cell dcell dthrou
(3) Mutat
in thepre-cfull-bl
. Becauseprimarilyreproductgenes, D
. The natu
type of in
nizing radinergy by prairs as it paatter. The lansfer, LETf energy a reposits perngth (i.e., k
olts/micron
. Mass, chvelocity oaffect theionization
(1) Heava higrange
(2) Radiagreat
. LET incrcharge ofparticle w
. In tissue,to the tis
diagnosti
eath - the cbris is carrih normal bi
e - in a verycell's reproncerous cewn, malign
dead cells aconcernedive structurA, etc.).
e, severity
cident radia
tion losesducing ionses throug
inear energ, is the amodiation
unit of pathiloelectron
keV/m).
rge andf a particlerate at whioccurs and
and/or higLET and loand do not
tion with a lr distances
ases with ththe particleill produce i
the biologicue volume
x-rays is a
ll can die lied away byological pro
small numuctive stru
ll. Over a pant cancer.
re rapidly rith cellulars such as t
nd time of
ion, the tot
unt
llhis related t
ly chargedse energy rpenetrate d
ng range (between in
e square ofand the lonization.
effect of rar critical tar
pproximatel
3
e millionsthe blood acesses to r
er of eventture allowin
eriod of ma
moved byeffects whie chromos
ppearance
l radiation
the range
particles (e.apidly witheeply.
.g., x- /-raeractions a
the chargeer its veloci
iation depeget and is t
3 keV/m.
Figure
f normal cend a new ceplace it.
, a damageg the cell toy years or
iological prh result in
omes and t
of biologica
ose and do
f the radiat
g., -particlistance, co
ys, high-end have a lo
on the incidty, the great
nds on theerefore a f
. Linear En
lls do naturll is usually
d cell mayregenerateecades, thi
cesses, raamage to ceir compon
l effects de
se.
ion in that
es, neutronsequently t
rgy -partiw LET.
ent particle.er likelihoo
mount of enction of L
ergy Transf
M PNFX7100508
lly. The degenerated
xhibit a chaas a potents may resul
iation safetrucialents (e.g.,
ends upon
aterial.
, protons) hhey have a
les) travel
The highethat charg
ergy transfT. The LE
er (LET)
1
ad
ngeiallyin a
is
the
aveshort
thed
erredof
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
4/23
M PNFX70508
3. Iaa
r
Ro
4. B
eriscLrtrL
a
b
101
radiation bnd it becommore gene
lates the v
BE is a meutcome co
ecause LE
xtent on thelationshipnot easy to
ompares soET in water.diations wite same LEdiations ha
ET.
. RBE is inLET and,
radiationRBE. Thihigher ioenergy d
. Beyond 1decreaseionizationsystem,system is
iology resees difficult tal term, the
rious radiat
surement opared to a r
depends t
specific tissetween LEderive. Fig
me RBE valNotice tha
h differentwhile som
e relatively
itially propoas the LET
increases, sis increase iization denposition for
00 keV/ms with incres are produart of the ewasted du
rch, manycompare t
relative biol
ion effects t
f the effectieference ra
a great
ue, theand RBE
ure 4ues to thesomeBEs have
e high LETsimilar
tional tofor ionizing
o does thes primarily tity and morhigh-LET r
of tissue, thsing LET.ed in the biergy deposto an over
4
ifferent type results of
ogic effecti
250 kV x-r
eness of adiation of 2
e result ofe optimaldiations.
RBEs more
ologicalited in theill effect.
s and enerthe experieness, RB
ays.
radiation in0 kV x-rays
igure 4. LE
Fi
ies of radiaents based, was devel
producing a.
T and RBE
ure 5. LET
tion are usesolely on L
oped. The
specific
in Water
versus RB
dET;RBE
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
5/23
5. Dr
eatal
a
b
6. I
euro
o
a
b
c
irect Actiondiation to i
lements in ttoms withine most sen
nd initiatingad to biolo
. Direct act
processparticles,the ioniz
. Direct act
effects fopostulatescenario,succeedithe damadose.
direct Actionergy may rnpaired eleactivity. Th
xygen and
xidizing age
. Althoughform oxy
. Biologicalcompounmay actwith watein the cell
. Consider
- It is possiteract direc
e cell, ionizthe target msitive structa chain of eical change
ion is the d
ith high LEprotons, antion track is
ion is assoc
r which a ze(e.g., gen
damage mg generatio
ge cumulati
n - Absorptiesult in freetron in thetwo subst
ater (H2O -
nt resulting
free radicalen and wat
l effects occds which ths oxidizingr, these ma.
d the princi
le for ionizily with criti
ing or excitiolecule (i.e.re in the nuvents whichor damage.
minant da
radiation (neutrons)
very dense
iated with r
ro thresholdtic effects).y be transns of cells,e with radi
n of radiati-radical foruter shell (nces in a c
- H2O+ +
from ionizat
are extremr in about 1
ur when then can damr reducinginactivate
pal action o
5
gal
ng, DNA iscleus)may
aging
e.g., -because.
diation
dose isIn thisitted to
makingtion
onation. Her.g., OH-) all likely to b
e-). The hy
ion of water
ely reactive0-5 second
free radicalge critical
agents andellular mec
f ionizing ra
the atomsd exhibit ae involved iroxyl radic
.
, most of thwithout ca
s interact wiell componmay form phanisms or
diation in hu
Figure 6.
/ moleculeshigh degreen free radicl (OH-) is th
reactionssing any bi
ith nearby cnts. Thus,roxides wh
interact with
mans.
Direct and
M PNFX7100508
have anof chemicall formatione major
ecombine tological effe
emicalfree radicalen they reagenetic m
Indirect Act
1
lare
cts.
tterial
ion
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
6/23
M PNFX70508
7. Fein
roE
a
b
8. P
t
a
b
101
ractionationxposure deltermittently
te allows fof sublethalffect is LET
. A single-curve forneutronsthat x-raylarger initthan neutRBE actuwith dose
as the sizis reduce
. Giving thto reach trememberay fractisurvival c
rotraction -e shape of
. Radiationlow dosetime is leexposure
. As the dotreatmentand morerepairedthe survivshallower
(1) Thereall surepair
- Radiationiveredat high dos
r some repamage.dependent.
ose survivax-rays and(left) showss have aial shoulderrons. Theally varies, getting lar
e of the dos.
radiation dhe same sur, RBE is thn curves burve.
he dose rathe survival
exposure drate, contins effectiveat a high d
se rate is lotime protrasublethal during the eal curve be.
is a point alethal damed.
ir
l
er
e
ose in 4 eqrviving fracti
relationshigins with th
te also affegraph.
elivered atously overhan the sase rate.
ered andted, more
amage canposure, soomes
t which neage is
6
al fractionson point (1p of that doe large sho
ts
e
be
ly
shows that-2) and pres
se to 250 klder which
Figure 7. F
Figu
it requiresents a diffephotons).
effects the s
ractionation
e 8. Protra
ore total dent RBE (i.Each of thehape of the
tion
se.,x-
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
7/23
9.t
a
b
c
10. In
ra
a
bc
Ite
(2) In soradio
xygen Effean in its ab
. The ratioproduce tkilling unconditionenhanceOER varidoses tobelow 2
. It is belieformationpresence
. The effec
LET partiprotons,different.
(1) For essen
oxyg(2) For n
oxygsmall
1906, two Fiosensitivit
. Actively
. The degr
. Radiosenactivity th
general te
at have a lxceptions (
e cells theensitive ph
t - Cells areence (i.e.,
of doses nehe same leer hypoxiais the oxyent ratio (
es from aboabout 2 fory (200 rad)
ed that freeincreases iof oxygen.
t of cell surv
cles (e.g., eutrons) is
-particles, thtially 1 (i.e.,
n effect).
utrons, then effect, bur than for x
rench scien. The Law
roliferating
e of differe
sitivity of ceat they mus
ms, this meng mitotic p.g., lympho
cell cycle cse of the c
more sensiypoxia).
eded toel of cello the aeratenER). The
ut 3 at high-ray doses.
radicalthe
ival for high
-particles,significantly
e OER isthere is no
e is anit is much
-rays (e.g.,
tists, Bergoof Bergonie
ells are the
ntiation of c
lls is proporpass throu
ans that raperiod are vytes) are li
7
n progresscle (i.e., th
tive to x-ray
d
-
bout 1.6).
ie and Tri and Tribon
most sensi
lls is invers
ional to thegh.
idly dividingry radiosented in the t
until the celG2 phase)
s in the pre
ondeau exdeau states
ive to radia
ely related
duration of
cells that asitive. Theble.
F
ls become .
ence of mo
mined cells:
tion.
o their radi
mitotic and
re poorly difgeneral rule
igure 9. Ox
M PNFX7100508
rozen in th
lecular oxy
for
sensitivity.
developme
ferentiatedas well as t
gen Effect
1
e
en
tal
ndhe
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
8/23
M PNFX70508
Physical
Linea
Relati
Fracti
Protr
11. R
vaof
de
a
b
12. D
ex
101
r Energy Tr
ve Biologic
onation
ction
diation exprious physien divided i
terministic).
. Stochastiprobabilithoweverthere is neffect ochereditarexposedthresholdby 1 Gy (
. Non-stocprevent cmeasuraeffect is nrelated toreddenin
terministicposures, at
Summar
nsfer (LET)
l Effectiven
osure carrieal and biolonto two bro
c / probabiliof occurrin
he severityo threshold,urring. Exaeffects. T
o radiation,. However,100 rad) is
astic / deteells from sule thresholot observedthe total do), epilation
non-stocham bomb ex
- Factors
ss (RBE)
s some riskgical factord classes,
tic risks arg, the probof the effectconsequenmples of stus, if somathe probabithe severityo worse th
rministic risviving or re(which vari(e.g., loss
se. Exampl(hair loss),
stic effectsposures to
8
ffecting Ra
Biologi
Cell
Ox
Ag
Sex
Sta
of radiationof the exptochastic (
so called bbility of theis not affecly any expochastic effeic cells (i.e.lity of canceof the cancn one indu
s are moreroducing.es among if too few c
es of non-stnd cataract
have beenoth the Ja
iation Res
ical
l type (Berg
eproductiv
itotic futur
egree of s
gen effect
(at exposu
e of health
effects. Thsure. Expor probabilis
ecause theeffect occuted by dosesure carriects include, any bodyr increaseser is not doed by 0.1
related to rs such, thdividuals),lls). The mochastic effs.
ell documeanese and
onse
nie & Trib
e rate
(lifetime)
ecialization
re see leu
is risk is relsure risks ftic) and non
effect has aring increas. It is alsosome non-
cancer andells exceptwith dose,e-related; ay (10 rad).
diation dosse effects hbelow this tagnitude ofects include
nted in acciMarshall Isl
ndeau)
(differentia
kemia risk
ted to ther people ar
-stochastic
statisticales with dosssumed thzero risk ofgenetic /germ cells)robably witcancer ind
e effects whave areshold, ththe injury iserythema (
dentalnders, and
ion)
hart)
or
e,the
areoutced
ich
skin
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
9/23
M PNFX71010508
9
Chernobyl. Most of these effects require an acute exposure in excess of 2 Gy (200 rad).Some of the well documented deterministic effects include:
a. Acute Radiation Injury - Acute, large doses of radiation may damage a sufficientnumber of radiosensitive cells to produce mild symptoms of radiation sickness withina few days to a few weeks. The immediate somatic effects may include symptomssuch as blood changes, nausea, vomiting, hair loss, diarrhea, dizziness, nervousdisorders, hemorrhage, and maybe death. Without medical care, half of the peopleexposed to a whole body acute exposure of 4 Gy (400 rad) may die within 60 days(LD50/60). Regardless of care, persons exposed to an acute exposure exceeding 7Gy (700 rad) are not likely to survive (LD100). Exposed individuals who survive acutewhole body exposures may also develop other delayed somatic effects such asepilation, cataracts, erythema, sterility and/or cancers.
(1) Hematopoietic syndrome (1 - 8 Gy) - The hematopoietic stem cells are the most
radiosensitive tissues in the body. Radiation doses of 2 Gy (200 rad) or morecan damage the blood forming capability of the body. Acute doses kill some ofthe mitotically active precursor stem cells, diminishing the subsequent supply ofmature red cells, white cells, and platelets. As mature circulating cells die andthe supply of new cells is inadequate to replace them, the physiologicalconsequences of hematopoietic system damage become manifest. TheHematopoietic syndrome includes such symptoms as increased susceptibility toinfection, bleeding, anemia, and lowered immunity. One of the principal causesof death after total-body irradiation is infection. For doses below 7 Gy (700 rad),the hematopoietic syndrome starts about 8 - 10 days post exposure with aserious drop in granulocyte and platelet counts. Pancytopenia (i.e., reduction ofall types of blood cells) follows about 3 - 4 weeks later, becoming complete at
doses above 5 Gy (500 rad). Petechiae (small hemorrhage under the skin) andpurpura are evident, and bleeding may be uncontrolled, causing anemia. Theremay be fever and rises in pulse and respiratory rates due to endogenousbacterial and mycotic infections. The infections may become uncontrolled due toimpaired granulocyte and antibody production. If at least 10% of thehematopoietic stem cells remain uninjured, recovery is possible. Otherwise,death occurs within 4 - 6 weeks.
(2) Gastrointestinal syndrome (8 - 30 Gy) - At doses above 8 Gy (800 rad), injury tothe gastrointestinal tract contributes increasingly to the severity of the manifest-illness phase. Such high exposures inhibit the renewal of the cells lining thedigestive tract. These cells are short lived and must be renewed at a high rate.
High exposures then lead to depletion of these cells within a few days. Thephysiological consequences of gastrointestinal injury may vary depending uponthe region and extent of damage. The small intestine contains the most sensitiveof these tissues followed by the stomach, colon, and rectum. The mouth andesophagus respond similarly to the skin. Thus, the result of high exposures is abreakdown of the mucosal lining and ulceration of the intestine. As the mucosabreaks down, bacteria can enter the bloodstream and are unchallenged becauseof the curtailed production of granulocytes. Beginning at approximately 12.5 Gy(1250 rad), early mortality occurs due to dehydration and electrolyte imbalance
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
10/23
M PNFX71010508
10
from leakage through the extensively ulcerated intestinal mucosa. Theseconditions develop over a few days and are characterized by cramping,abdominal pain, and diarrhea, followed by shock and death.
(3) Central nervous system syndrome (> 30 Gy) - CSN symptoms are identifiedalmost immediately and consist of disorientation, apathy, ataxia, prostration andoften tremor and convulsions. The cause of death includes vascular damage,meningitis, myelitis, and encephalitis. Fluid infiltrates into the meninges, brainand choroid plexus causing edema, this pressure may cause pressure on criticalstructures.
b. Cataracts seem to have a threshold of about 2 Gy (200 rad) and are more probablefrom acute neutron doses. They tend to have a long latent period. They can bedistinguished from age-induced cataracts because senile cataracts begin in theanterior pole of the lens whereas radiation cataracts begin as a small dot in the
posterior pole.
c. Hair loss (epilation) can occur after acute doses of 2 - 5 Gy (200 - 500 rad).Temporary hair loss in radiotherapy patients begins in about 3 weeks and hair beginsto return during the second month continuing up to 1 year. Single doses of 7 Gy(700 rad) may cause permanent epilation with a latent period of less than 3 weeks.Hair follicles of children are more sensitive than those of adults. Body hair tends tobe less sensitive than the scalp and beard.
d. Skin erythema (reddening) occurs from a single dose of 6 - 8 Gy (600 - 800 rad) witha threshold of 4 Gy (400 rad) in sensitive individuals. The higher the radiation dose,the more quickly the erythema appears. Early erythema is thought to be due to the
release of vasoactive amines. Erythema increases during the first week and usuallyfades during the second week, only to return and may last for 20 - 30 days.
e. Sterility, depending on dose may be either temporary or permanent in males.Although females require a higher dose, sterility is usually permanent. The femalethreshold for permanent sterility usually requires doses exceeding 2 Gy (200 rad) tothe reproductive cells. Male, temporary sterility may occur at a threshold of 0.5 Gy(50 rad).
13. Stochastic / probabilistic effects have been demonstrated through epidemiological studiesof acutely exposed populations. The two main categories of stochastic effects arecarcinogenic and genetic.
a. Cancer - Radiation is considered a generic carcinogen. That is, while cancersmay be produced by ionizing radiation, the cancers are indistinguishable fromspontaneous or non-radiation cancers. Additionally, there is usually a long,variable latent period (> 5 to 30 years) from radiation exposure to cancermanifestation, making cause and effect difficult to identify. Another reason it isdifficult to pin-point cause is that the normal cancer incidence is relatively high(i.e., the fatal cancer risk from all causes in the U.S. is about 20% or one personin five), the number of cancers expected from radiation exposure are a fraction of
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
11/23
b
14. T
arm
a
b
1% ofradiatyears
Sometable
Lp
B T B L
. Geneticflies andsurvivorsthat it islong and
major no
Fr M
ratogenic eknown to
rtality in th
. Dose dewith teratSv (5 re
. Time dephigher du
the normalion-inducedfor onset.
of the popuata include
ukemia - etientseast - TB pyroid - ringne - radiumng - uraniu
ffects - Whiice, there i
after threeifficult to exthe mutatio
-human so
uit flies - Mice - Russel
fects resultccur in 3 -United Sta
endent - Thogenic effec).
endent - Thring the earl
incidence.cancer and
lation studi:
rly radiolog
eumothoraorm and thdial painteminers
le radiations no evidenenerations.rapolate anrisk, even
rces that d
ller, 1927l, 1950s
from both s% of all ne
tes, accoun
ere is a dosts in man is
effects vay stages
11
he table li, in parenth
s of radiati
ists, atom b
x patients, aymus irradis
as been shce of mutag
Some of timal data tot 5 rem, is
monstrate
ochastic anborns and
ing for mor
e dependen0.1 Sv (10
y with the s
ts the suscsis, some
n induced
mb survivo
tom bombted patient
own to cauenic effectse reasons fman, the r
small and n
genetic effe
d non-stochthey are ththan 20%
cy in that them). The t
tage of pre
ptibility of tif the mean
ancers use
rs, ankylosi
urvivors
e geneticseen in atoor this lackproductive
ot detectabl
cts are:
astic effectleading ca
of all infant
e lowest dohreshold for
nancy and t
M PNFX7100508
ssues tolatent perio
to generat
g spondylit
utations inm bombf evidenceycle in ma. The two
. Birth defese of infaneaths.
se associatconcern is
he risks are
1
s in
e the
is
fruit
areis
cts
d.05
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
12/23
M PNFX70508
c
101
(1) Preimbe anspontand n
(2) Orga
weeksensithe mundiffrapidlPossistagedeath(still bmalfo
(3) Fetal
weekorganpassbe deEffectpregnsurvivchanretardmicroincrecanc
and teffectdocuStew
. Summaryteratogenseen to bcell killin
plantation (all or none
aneous aboever be aw
ogenesis (
) - this is aive period dass oferentiated a
dividing cble outcomeinclude pre, perinatal dirth) orrmation.
growth (8 -
) - onceogenesis hd, effects mvelopmentas seen inant atom boors includees, mentalation,cephaly, ansed risk ofr, both leuk
mors. Thisalsoented byrt, et. al.
- Thus theic effects are determinieffects that
- 1 week prisk, damagrtion, the wre of the co
- 8
ue to
ndlls.s atatal
eath
0
sayl.
mbCNS
anhildmia
last
etic /
12
ost concepte results inman wouldnception.
ion) - the risprenatal deexperience
Figure 1
k during thith manifesta normal m
0. Teratoge
period tened as aenstrual cyc
nic Effect
s to
le
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
13/23
15. Threex
huyehais
ett
result in fstochastiand other
table illus
ere have buired for s
posed acut
man populars, variouss some valithat low-do
Thres
Deter
No-thproba
Lineathat tdirectdose,certaikilling
Lineamodelowerdamaless riincredose
Horm
suggdosepositi
hile all of tffect of radireshold moe risk. Hoembers of t
etal death,/ probabilicancers. T
trates the ri
en extensivall dose efly. The ma
tion from exdose-respoity and eace effects ar
hold - thisministic effe
reshold - thibilistic effec
r - this mode effect incproportion tthis has be
n dose rangeffects.
r-quadratic -l suggests tdoses, therge and consk while thesed risk at.
esis - this m
sts that vermay actuale effects.
e models htion is detri
del. The beever, adopthe populati
ross malfortic effects the first tabl
k of NOT d
e studies ofects, mostin goal of th
cessive annse modelsh can be coe not the sa
odel postulcts have a t
s model sugts theoretic
l assumeseases ino then seen in
es for cell
thisat atis less
equentlyre isigh
odel
lowly enhance
ve a basisental and
nefit to usinion of the mn.
13
mations anat result frdemonstra
eveloping c
radiation eff these stu
ese studies
/or unnecehave beenrrectly applime as high-
ates a minireshold.
gests that ally have no
unctions lik
in fact, for rhe model ug this modeodel reinfor
Fi
growth retm cell mutates the risk
ildhood ca
fects. Becaies have lohas been t
sary radiatiproposed aed to a subdose effect
um dose r
ny dose hathreshold.
e immune r
gulatory pused to predil is the likelices a fear o
igure 11. D
rdations. Ttions and pto the fetus
cer for vari
use of the loked at sm
understan
on exposurnd debated.et of the da
quired for a
conseque
sponse an
rposes, it isct this effechood that itf radiation e
ose-Respon
M PNFX7100508
hey are alsoduce leukand the se
us doses.
rge populaller populatithe risk to
. ThroughEach mod
ta. The pro
n effect.
ce, stocha
may have
assumed tis the linea
overestimatxposure in
se Model
1
miaond
ionsonsthe
hel
blem
tic /
er, noes
any
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
14/23
M PNFX70508
C. Radi
1. AAAa
b
c
2. P
101
tion Protec
LARA philochievable.LARA.
. Time.
(1) The lx-rayrecei
(2) Use e
retak
(3) Do n
unlesapronprote
. Distance.
(1) Radiathe sthe smrem
mrem(2) When
advaswitc
. Shielding
(1) Radia(2) Rem
(3) Use pfluorothe b
(4) Alwa
will n
ersonal dos
tion Practic
ophy: Meaorkers us
ss time you, the less ee.
stablished ts.
t remain inneeded, w
unless behtive shield.
tion intensituare of theurce. If at
/hr, at 6 fee
/hr (i.e., inv
using portatage of theto remain
.
tion intensit
in behind th
rotective apscopic / caram.
s shield patt interfere
imeter
s
sures takentime, dista
are exposeposure you
echniques,
n fluoro roear a proteind the oper
decreasesdistance frofeet it is 1it is only 2
rse square
bles, takelong exposut least 6 fe
is decreas
e operator
rons when tiac cath su
ients whenith the stud
14
to maintainnce, and sh
d towill
void
mtiveators
withm0
law).
ret from the t
ed by shiel
hield (contr
aking x-rayite. Wear p
he shield (ey.
exposuresielding to k
ubehead.
ing materia
ol booth) du
with a portrotective glo
.g., protecti
igure 11.
As Low Asep their rad
l (e.g., lead)
ring x-ray p
able machinves if your
e apron, g
ime - Dista
Reasonablyiation expos
.
roduction.
e or if in aand will be
nad shield,
ce - Shieldi
ure
in
etc.)
ing
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
15/23
a
b
c
3. R
a
b
a
d
4. P
a
b
c
. Whole bo
(1) Wear
(2) Returbeforbreak
. Wear theand waist
. When usihave onlydosimetea second
body dosithe secooutside tmeasure
adiation pr
. For adult,whole bomrem/yr (
. Minors (u
are allowlimit.
. Declaredallowed 5during th
. Expectedcourse, 0
regnancy S
. Studentsinform th
. PregnantOfficer onas low as
. Declaredgestation
dy dosimet
only your d
n dosimeterleaving x-r
s/lunch and
dosimeter, with windo
ng a protecta single do
r outside thdosimeter,
imeter bened collar be apron. Tthyroid an
tection guid
radiation wy dose limi
5.0 rem/yr).
nder 18 yea
d 10% of t
pregnant w00 mrem togestation
exposure d- 10 mrem
urveillance
who are preinstructor
students wihow to insreasonably
pregnant wperiod.
r will be iss
simeter
to storage ray lab forat close of
etween show facing ou
ive apron, asimeter, weapron. If year the wh
ath the aprodge at theis secondlens dose.
es
orkers, theis 5000
rs of age)
e adult
rkers arethe fetuseriod.
uring
rogram
gnant, or wr their supe
ll receive adre that theiachievable.
rkers expo
15
ued to each
ack
ay.
ulders.
nd youar theou haveole
n andollar,adge
o suspect trvisor
ditional instalready lo
ures are li
student
hat they mi
ruction fromradiation e
ited to 500
ht be preg
the Radiatixposure ca
mrem durin
M PNFX7100508
ant, should
n Protectiobe maintai
g the entire
1
nned
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
16/23
M PNFX71010508
16
5. Radiation Protection Office Location and Staff
1. RPO: Location: Rm 0410, Willis Hall
2. Telephone: x6011/6632
3. Dosimetry Coordinator: x2614/1869
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
17/23
M PNFX71010508
A-1
APPENDIX AINSTRUCTOR'S GUIDE
EFFECTS ON THE EMBRYO/FETUSOF EXPOSURE TO RADIATION AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
In order to decide whether to continue working while exposed to ionizing radiation during her pregnancy,a woman should understand the potential effects on an embryo/fetus, including those that may beproduced by various environmental risks such as smoking and drinking. This will allow her to comparethese risks with those produced by exposure to ionizing radiation.
Table 1 provides information on the potential effects resulting from exposure of an embryo/fetus toradiation and nonradiation risks. The second column gives the rate at which the effect is produced bynatural causes in terms of the number per thousand cases. The fourth column gives the number ofadditional effects per thousand cases believed to be produced by exposure to the specified amount of therisk factor.
The following section discusses the studies from which the information in Table 1 was derived. Theresults of exposure of the embryo/fetus to the risk factors and the dependence on the amount of theexposure are explained.
RADIATION RISKS
Childhood CancerNumerous studies of radiation-induced childhood cancer have been performed, but a number of them arecontroversial. The National Academy of Science (NAS) BEIR report reevaluated the data from thesestudies and even reanalyzed the results. Some of the strongest support for a casual relationship isprovided by twin data from the Oxford survey. For maternal radiation doses of 1,000 millirems, theexcess number of deaths (above those occurring from natural causes) was found to be 0.6 death perthousand children.
Mental Retardation and Abnormal Smallness of the Head (Microcephaly)Studies of Japanese children who were exposed while in the womb to the atomic bomb radiation atHiroshima and Nagasaki have shown evidence of both small head size and mental retardation. Most ofthe children were exposed to radiation doses in the range of 1 to 50 rads. The importance of the mostrecent studies lies in the fact that investigators were able to show that the gestational age (age of theembryo/fetus after conception) at the time the children were exposed was a critical factor. Theapproximate risk of small head size as a function of gestational age is shown in Table 1. For a radiationdose of 1,000 millirems at 4 to 7 weeks after conception, the excess cases of small head size was 5 perthousand; at 8 to 11 weeks, it was 9 per thousand.
In another study, the highest risk of mental retardation occurred during the 8 to 15 week period afterconception. A recent EPA study has calculated that excess cases of mental retardation per live birth lie
between 0.5 and 4 per thousand per rad.
Genetic EffectsRadiation-induced genetic effects have not been observed to date in humans. The largest source ofmaterial for genetic studies involves the survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but the 77,000 births thatoccurred among the survivors showed no evidence of genetic effects. For doses received by thepregnant worker in the course of employment considered in this guide, the dose received by theembryo/fetus apparently would have a negligible effect on descendants.
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
18/23
M PNFX71010508
A-2
NONRADIATION RISKS
Occupation
A recent study involving the birth records of 130,000 children in the State of Washington indicates that therisk of death to the unborn child is related to the occupation of the mother. Workers in the metal industry,the chemical industry, medical technology, the wood industry, the textile industry, and farms exhibitedstillbirths or spontaneous abortions at a rate of 90 per thousand above that of workers in the controlgroup, which consisted of workers in several other industries.
AlcoholIt has been recognized since ancient times that alcohol consumption had an effect on the unborn child.Carthaginian law forbade the consumption of wine on the wedding night so that a defective child mightnot be conceived. Recent studies have indicated that small amounts of alcohol consumption have onlythe minor effect of reducing the birth weight slightly, but when consumption increases to 2 to 4 drinks perday, a pattern of abnormalities called the fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) begins to appear. This syndromeconsists of reduced growth in the unborn child, faulty brain function, and abnormal facial features. Thereis a syndrome that has the same symptoms as full-blown FAS that occurs in children born to mothers who
have not consumed alcohol. This naturally occurring syndrome occurs in about 1 to 2 cases perthousand.
For mothers who consume 2 to 4 drinks per day, the excess occurrences number about 100 perthousand; and for those who consume more than 4 drinks per day, excess occurrences number 200 perthousand. The most sensitive period for this effect of alcohol appears to be the first few weeks afterconception, before the mother-to-be realizes she is pregnant. Also, 17% or 170 per thousand of theembryo/fetuses of chronic alcoholics develop FAS and die before birth. FAS was first identified in 1973 inthe United States where less than full-blown effects of the syndrome are now referred to as fetal alcoholeffects (FAE).
SmokingSmoking during pregnancy causes reduced birth weights in babies amounting to 5 to 9 ounces on the
average. In addition, there is an increased risk of 5 infant deaths per thousand for mothers who smokeless than one pack per day and 10 infant deaths per thousand for mothers who smoke one or more packsper day.
MiscellaneousNumerous other risks affect the embryo/fetus, only a few of which are touched upon here. Most peopleare familiar with the drug thalidomide (a sedative given to some pregnant women), which causes childrento be born with missing limbs, and the more recent use of the drug diethylstilbestrol (DES), a syntheticestrogen given to some women to treat menstrual disorders, which produced vaginal cancers in thedaughters born to women who took the drug. Living at high altitudes also gives rise to an increase in thenumber of low-birth-weight children born, while an increase in Down's Syndrome (mongolism) occurs inchildren born to mothers who are over 35 years of age. The rapid growth in the use of ultrasound inrecent years has sparked an ongoing investigation into the risks of using ultrasound for diagnostic
procedures.
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
19/23
M PNFX71010508
A-3
TABLE 1. EFFECTS OF RISK FACTORS ON PREGNANCY OUTCOME
Effect
Number Occurring
from Natural Causes Risk Factor
Excess Occurrence
from Risk Factor
RADIATION RISK
Childhood Cancer
Cancer death in children 1.4 per thousand Radiation dose of 1000 mremreceived before birth
0.6 per thousand
Abnormalities Radiation dose of 1000 mrem received during specificperiods after conception:
Small head size 40 per thousand 4-7 weeks after conception 5 per thousand
Small head size 40 per thousand 8-11 weeks after conception 9 per thousand
Mental retardation 4 per thousand Radiation dose of 1000 mremreceived 8 to 15 weeks after
conception
4 per thousand
NON-RADIATION RISKS
Occupation
Stillbirth or spontaneousabortion
200 per thousand Work in high-risk occupations(see text)
90 per thousand
Alcohol Consumption
Fetal alcohol syndrome 1 to 2 per thousand 2 - 4 drinks per day 100 per thousand
Fetal alcohol syndrome 1 to 2 per thousand More than 4 drinks per day 200 per thousand
Fetal alcohol syndrome 1 to 2 per thousand Chronic alcoholic (more than10 drinks per day)
350 per thousand
Perinatal infant death(around the time of birth)
23 per thousand Chronic alcoholic (more than10 drinks per day)
170 per thousand
Smoking
Perinatal infant death 23 per thousand Less than 1 pack per day 5 per thousand
Perinatal infant death 23 per thousand One pack or more per day 10 per thousand
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
20/23
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
21/23
M PNFX71010508
B-1
APPENDIX BPREGNANT WORKER'S GUIDE
POSSIBLE HEALTH RISKS TO CHILDRENOF WOMEN WHO ARE EXPOSED TO RADIATION DURING PREGNANCY
During pregnancy, you should be aware of things in your surroundings or in your style of life that couldaffect your unborn child. For those of you who work in or visit areas designated as Restricted Areas(where access is controlled to protect individuals from being exposed to radiation and radioactivematerials), it is desirable that you understand the biological risks of radiation to your unborn child.
Everyone is exposed daily to various kinds of radiation: heat, light, ultraviolet, microwave, ionizing, andso on. For the purposes of this guide, only ionizing radiation (such as x-rays, gamma rays, neutrons, andother high-speed atomic particles) is considered. Actually, everything is radioactive and all humanactivities involve exposure to radiation. People are exposed to different amounts of natural "background"ionizing radiation depending on where they live. Radon gas in homes is a problem of growing concernand is estimated to contribute an average of 150 mrem per year to the average annual dose.
Background radiation comes from three sources (other than radon):
Source Average Annual Dose
Terrestrial -- radiation from soil and rocks 50 millirem
Cosmic -- radiation from outer space 50 millirem
Radioactivity normally found within the humanbody
25 millirem
TOTAL: 125 millirem
Dosage range (geographic and other factors) 75 to 5,000 millirem
NOTE: Radiation doses in this document are described in two different units. The rad is a measure ofthe amount of energy absorbed in a certain amount of material (100 ergs per gram). Equalamounts of energy absorbed from different types of radiation may lead to different biologicaleffects. The rem is a unit that reflects the biological damage done to the body. The millirad andmillirem refer to 1/1000 of a rad and a rem, respectively.
The first two of these sources expose the body from the outside, and the last one exposes it from theinside. The average person is thus exposed to a total dose of about 125 millirems per year from naturalbackground radiation.
In addition to exposure from normal background radiation, medical procedures may contribute to the dosepeople receive. On average, people receive about 40 mrem per year from medical sources, although the
exposure to individuals are highly variable, depending on the specific procedures that the individual hasbeen subjected. The following table lists the average doses received by the bone marrow (theblood-forming cells) from different medical applications.
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
22/23
M PNFX71010508
B-2
X-Ray Procedure Average Dose
Normal chest examination 10 millirem
Normal dental examination 10 millirem
Rib cage examination 140 millirem
Gall bladder examination 170 millirem
Barium enema examination 500 millirem
Pelvimetry examination 600 millirem
NOTE: Variations by a factor of 2 (above and below) are not unusual.
NRC POSITION
NRC regulations and guidance are based on the conservative assumption that any amount of radiation,
no matter how small, can have a harmful effect on an adult, child or unborn child. This assumption is saidto be conservative because there are no data showing ill effects from small doses; the National Academyof Sciences recently expressed "uncertainty as to whether a dose, of say, 1 rad would have any effect atall". Although it is known that the unborn child is more sensitive to radiation than adults, particularlyduring certain stages of development, the NRC has not established a special dose limit for protection ofthe unborn child. Such a limit could result in job discrimination for women of child-bearing age andperhaps in the invasion of privacy (if pregnancy tests were required) if a separate regulatory dose limitwere specified for the unborn child. Therefore, the NRC has taken the position that special protection ofthe unborn child should be voluntary and should be based on decisions made by workers and employerswho are well informed about the risks involved.
For the NRC position to be effective, it is important that both the employee and the employer understandthe risk to the unborn child from radiation received as a result of the occupational exposure of the mother.
This document tries to explain the risk as clearly as possible and to compare it with other risks to theunborn child during pregnancy. It is hoped this will help pregnant employees balance the risk to theunborn child against the benefits of employment to decide if the risk is worth taking. This document alsodiscusses methods of keeping the dose, and therefore the risk, to the unborn child as low as isreasonably achievable.
RADIATION DOSE LIMITS
The NRC's present limit on the radiation dose that can be received on the job is 1,250 millirems perquarter (3 months) (NOTE: The limit is 3,000 millirems per quarter if the worker's occupational dosehistory is known and the average dose does not exceed 5,000 millirems per year.) Working minors(those under 18) are limited to a dose equal to one-tenth that of adults, 125 millirems per quarter.
Because of the sensitivity of the unborn child, the National Council on Radiation Protection andMeasurements (NCRP) has recommended that the dose equivalent to the unborn child from occupationalexposure of the expectant mother be limited to 500 millirems for the entire pregnancy. The 1987Presidential guidance specifies an effective dose equivalent limit of 500 millirems to the unborn child if thepregnancy has been declared by the mother; the guidance also recommends that substantial variations inthe rate of exposure be avoided. The NRC has proposed adoption of the above limits on dose and rate ofexposure.
ADVICE FOR EMPLOYEE AND EMPLOYER
8/2/2019 PNFX7101 M - Radiation Safety Brief
23/23
M PNFX71010508
B-3
Although the risks to the unborn child are small under normal working conditions, it is still advisable tolimit the radiation dose from occupational exposure to no more than 500 millirems for the total pregnancy.Employee and employer should work together to decide the best method for accomplishing this goal.Some methods that might be used include reducing the time spent in radiation areas, wearing someshielding over the abdominal area, and keeping an extra distance from radiation sources when possible.The employer or health physicist will be able to estimate the probable dose to the unborn child during thenormal nine-month pregnancy period and to inform the employee of the amount. If the predicted doseexceeds 500 millirems, the employee and employer should work out schedules or procedures to limit thedose to the 500-millirem recommended limit.
It is important that the employee inform the employer of her condition as soon as she realizes she ispregnant if the dose to the unborn child is to be minimized.
INTERNAL HAZARDS
This document has been directed primarily toward a discussion of radiation doses received from sources
outside the body. Workers should also be aware that there is a risk of radioactive material entering thebody in work places where unsealed radioactive material is used. Nuclear medicine clinics, laboratories,and certain manufacturers use radioactive material in bulk form, often as a liquid or a gas. A list of thecommonly used materials and safety precautions for each is beyond the scope of this document, butcertain general precautions might include the following:
1. Do not smoke, eat, drink, or apply cosmetics around radioactive material2. Do not pipette solutions by mouth3. Use disposable gloves while handling radioactive material when feasible4. Wash hands after working around radioactive material5. Wear lab coats or other protective clothing whenever there is a possibility of spills.
Remember that the employer is required to have demonstrated that it will have safe procedures and
practices before the NRC issues it a license to use radioactive material. Workers are urged to followestablished procedures and consult the employer's radiation safety officer or health physicist wheneverproblems or questions arise.
Recommended