View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Phase 1 Habitat Survey and Bat
Roost Potential Survey
of
The Former Rossendale Hospital,
Rawtenstall, Lancashire
on behalf of
Taylor Wimpey Manchester
October 2011
© James Blake Associates 2011
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
2 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Revision Purpose Originated Checked Authorised Date
AO OR OR/RH 10/2011
Job Number: JBA 11/263
Title: Phase 1 Habitat Survey and Bat Roost
Potential Survey of the former Rossendale
Hospital, Lancashire
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
3 JBA 11/263 October 2011
CONTENTS
0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................4
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................5
2 METHODS ..........................................................................................................................7
Desk study ................................................................................................................................7
Phase 1 Habitat Survey ...........................................................................................................7
3 RESULTS ...........................................................................................................................9
4 KEY RECOMMENDATIONS, FURTHER SURVEYS AND PRECAUTIONARY
METHODS ........................................................................................................................46
5 ENHANCEMENT (ADDITIONAL) RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................46
6 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................47
7 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................48
8 APPENDICES...................................................................................................................50
Appendix A: Phase 1 habitat map .........................................................................................50
Appendix B: Site plan showing building Target Note number locations ...............................51
Appendix C: Plant species list................................................................................................52
Appendix D: Relevant protected species legislation .............................................................54
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
4 JBA 11/263 October 2011
0 Executive Summary
0.1 A Phase 1 Habitat Survey and Bat Roost Potential Survey were carried out at the
former Rossendale Hospital in Lancashire on the 29th September 2011.
0.2 The site was dominated by derelict hospital buildings, associated infrastructure,
woodland, small areas of coarse (former amenity) grassland, and scattered trees
and shrubs.
0.3 Further survey is recommended to assess bat activity on the site.
0.4 The site had limited potential to support other protected, BAP or rare species. No
further survey is recommended but precautionary measures should be followed
to minimise any potential risk of harm to any such species which may be present
on the site.
0.5 Tree, hedgerow or ground clearance should be carried out outside the main bird
breeding season (March until end of August) or under ecological supervision.
0.6 It was considered that by following the key recommendations outlined in this
report, the development can proceed with minimal risk of harm to protected, BAP
or rare species or to local nature conservation.
0.7 By following some, or all, of the enhancement recommendations, it was
considered that the site could be improved for local wildlife, post development.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
5 JBA 11/263 October 2011
1 Introduction
Background
1.1 James Blake Associates were commissioned by Taylor Wimpey Manchester to
undertake a Phase 1 Habitat Survey, and Bat Roost Potential Inspection at the
former Rossendale Hospital in Lancashire. Grid ref: SD 796 225 (taken from the
centre of the site).
1.2 The survey was required to accompany a planning application to develop the site.
The proposed development includes detached and semi-detached residential houses
with associated infrastructure and landscaping.
1.3 Wildlife, such as nesting birds and bats are protected species. All protected and
Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) species are material considerations for individual
planning decisions under PPS9 (Planning Policy Statement 9) (ODPM, 1994).
Site Description
1.4 The site was located at the former Rossendale Hospital in Lancashire. The site was
surrounded by existing residential areas to the east and west, the A681 Haslingden
Road to the south (beyond which lay All Saints High School and a small reservoir),
and rough grazing/moorland to the north and west (see Figure 1 below).
1.5 The site itself could broadly be separated into two dominant areas: The former
hospital buildings and infrastructure in the north-western half of the site; and mixed
woodland in the south-eastern half. There were smaller areas of amenity and coarse
grassland, ruderal vegetation, scrub, hedgerows and individual trees and shrubs
which were scattered throughout the site.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
6 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Figure 1. Site location: Former Rossendale Hospital
Reproduced from Ordnance Survey map data by permission of Ordnance Survey, ©
Crown copyright.
Aims and objectives
1.6 The aim of the survey was to:
• Identify the presence or likely presence of any protected or notable species
or habitats on or adjacent to the site;
• Assess the potential impact of the proposed works on any protected or
notable species and/or habitats present including nature conservation sites
on or adjacent to the site;
• Make any recommendations for further surveys and/or mitigation following
the survey (if necessary) and provide suggestions to enhance the wildlife
value of the site post-development;
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
7 JBA 11/263 October 2011
2 Methods
Desk study
2.1 A 2km radius search for statutory designated sites, either on the proposed
development site or in the surrounding area, was conducted using “MAGIC”, the
Multi-Agency Geographic Information system for the Countryside.
2.2 The National Biodiversity Network (NBN) website was accessed on the 4th October
2011 to obtain records of protected, BAP or rare species on and around the site.
2.3 The site is covered by the Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Lancashire.
Phase 1 Habitat Survey
2.4 A Phase 1 Habitat Survey was undertaken by Odette Robson BSc (Hons) PhD
MIEEM (great crested newt licence number 20113048; bat licence number
20112704) on the 29th of September 2011. During the survey, the temperature was
14°C; there was a light wind (Beaufort scale 0-1), 60% cloud cover and good
visibility.
2.5 The survey methodology followed JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee)
Guidelines (JNCC, 2007) and included mapping habitat types and identifying all plant
species observed on the site, including Wildlife and Countryside Act Schedule 9
invasive plant species, such as Japanese Knotweed Fallopia japonica and Giant
Hogweed Heracleum mantegazzianum.
2.6 The site was also assessed for signs and evidence of protected, BAP and rare
species in accordance with Natural England Guidelines, as follows:
2.7 Bats: Mature trees within the site boundary, and adjacent to the site boundary, were
surveyed externally, from the ground, for their potential to support roosting bats,
under the following criteria:
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
8 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Table 1: Bat survey protocol for trees (Potential bat roosting opportunities were identified in order to categorise trees, as below):
Bat Roost Potential Field Signs
Confirmed roost Confirmed bat roost in tree: Field evidence of the
past or current presence of bats, e.g. droppings,
staining.
High roost potential
Splits or cracks in major limbs which develop
upwards, smooth surface around entry point,
dense ivy-covering, woodpecker/rot holes,
significant lifting bark, artificial bird or bat boxes.
Ancient or over mature trees where the canopy
cannot be fully inspected from the ground.
Medium roost potential Splits in branches, dense ivy-covering, small
cavities, dense epicormic growth, flies around
entry point.
Low roost potential
Splits in minor branches, sparse ivy, and limited
loose bark.
Young, healthy tree with good visibility to the top
of the canopy.
No roost potential Trees with a negligible potential to support bat
roosts (not supporting any of the above
features).
2.8 Bat Survey Protocol for buildings: all buildings where access was possible were
inspected externally and internally for signs or evidence of past or present usage by
roosting bats. Some buildings were not accessed due to being boarded up or where
asbestos made access unsafe. Roof voids and cellars – where present - were
accessed in most buildings. Binoculars were used to assess buildings externally for
entry points such as cracks or holes, plus evidence of bat activity such as staining,
droppings, feeding remains (such as butterfly or moth wings) that could indicate past
presence of bats
2.9 Dormice: A visual survey for the presence of suitable habitat (broad leaved or mixed
woodland with good under-storey/shrub layer and a range of food plant species,
such as hazel, bramble and honeysuckle) was carried out, to assess if dormice were
likely to be present.
2.10 Reptiles: A visual survey for the presence of suitable habitat was carried out
according to the criteria given in the Reptile Mitigation Guidelines (Natural England
2011).
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
9 JBA 11/263 October 2011
2.11 Invertebrates: The site was scoped for significant rotting deadwood, and high
quality aquatic or other habitats which could be used by significant assemblages of
invertebrates, or by any of the invertebrates highlighted in the data search.
2.12 Badgers: A visual survey for setts, hair, latrines, prints, snuffle marks or other signs
of badgers was undertaken within the site boundary.
2.13 Flora and habitats: All habitats and plant species which were identifiable at the time
of the survey were recorded. Habitats adjacent to the site were identified, using
aerial maps and field observation, so that the ecological impact of the proposed
works on the wider landscape could be assessed.
3 Results
Desk Study
Statutory Nature Conservation Sites
3.1 There were three statutory designated areas within 2km of the site: These were
areas of Moorland Line. The Moorland Line encloses land within England which has
been defined as predominantly semi-natural upland vegetation, or predominantly of
rock outcrops and semi-natural vegetation, used primarily for rough grazing. These
are detailed in Table 1 and shown in Figure 2.
Table 2: Statutory conservation sites within 2km of the site
Site Name Designation Distance from the site
Description
Dearden Moor Moorland Line 1.8km south-
east Predominantly semi-natural upland vegetation, or predominantly of rock outcrops and semi-natural vegetation,
used primarily for rough grazing. N/A Moorland Line 1.5km north
N/A Moorland Line 1km north- east
Non-Statutory Nature Conservation Sites
3.2 There were no known non-statutory designated sites within 2km of the site.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
10 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Figure 2: Statutory conservation sites within 2km of the site
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
11 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Habitat types within 2km
3.3 Habitat types within the area included a number of plantation woodlands, areas of
lowland meadow and blanket bog. The nearest woodlands (outside the site
boundary) were located approximately 100m to the south and east of the site. The
nearest lowland meadows were approximately 1.8km to the north-east and the
nearest area of blanket bog was approximately 1.9km to the north.
Figure 3: Habitat types within 2 km
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
12 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Protected, BAP and Rare Species
3.4 The Birds of Conservation Concern (BoCC) are split into three criteria. The red list is
the highest conservation priority (species needing urgent action). The amber list is
the next most critical group, followed by green. Red listed species are those that are
globally threatened according to IUCN criteria, species with populations or ranges
that have declined rapidly in recent years, and those that have declined historically
and have not shown a substantial recent recovery.
3.5 A search of species records held by the NBN highlighted numerous records of
protected, BAP and notable flora and fauna within 2km of the site. The site is within
the area covered by the Lancashire local BAP.
3.6 Full lists of UK and Local BAP and protected amphibians, reptiles and mammals are
shown below. A reduced list of UK and Local BAP and protected birds, flora and
invertebrates is shown; these have been selected based on their likelihood of being
recorded at the site given the habitats types present.
Table 3: Mammal records within 2 km of the site
Mammals Protection Approximate
distance from site
Year of
Record
Badger Protection of Badgers Act 10km south 2007
Brown hare UK and local BAP Same 10km square as
the site 2006
Brown long eared bat European protected, UK
and local BAP Same 10km square as
the site 2007
Common pipistrelle European protected, local
BAP
0.4km north west
0.5km north east 2006
Daubenton’s Bat European protected, local
BAP 5km south 2010
Hedgehog UK BAP Same 10km square as
the site 1978
Leisler’s bat European protected, local
BAP 9km south west 2006
Natterer’s bat European protected, local
BAP Same 10km square as
the site 2011
Noctule bat European protected, UK
and local BAP 9km south west 2006
Red squirrel UK and local BAP 6km north west 2008
Soprano pipistrelle European protected, UK
and local BAP 0.4km north 2006
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
13 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Water vole UK and local BAP Same 10km square as
the site 2001
Whiskered / Brandt’s bat European protected, local
BAP Same 10km square as
the site 2011
Table 4: Bird records within 2 km of the site
Birds Protection Approximate
distance from site
Year of
Record
Barn Owl WCA Schedule 1 Same 10km square as
the site 1988-1991
Cuckoo BoCC Red list, UK BAP Same 10km square as
the site
Between
1988-1991
Grasshopper warbler BoCC Red list, UK BAP Same 2km square as
the site
Between
2004-2009
Curlew BoCC Amber list, UK BAP Same 2km square as
the site
Between
2002-2007
Dunlin BoCC Red list Same 10 km square
as the site 1988-1991
Starling BoCC Red list 0.9km south
0.3km east
2008
2009
Fieldfare BoCC Red list 5.5km north east 2009
Tree sparrow BoCC Red list, UK BAP 4km north west 1990
Grey Partridge BoCC Red list, UK BAP Same 2km square as
the site
Between
2002-2007
House sparrow BoCC Red list, UK BAP 500m south-east,
0.8km south west 2008
Northern Lapwing BoCC Red list, UK and
local BAP
Same 2km square as
the site 1999
Ring Ouzel BoCC Red list, UK BAP 2km south west 1997
Redwing BoCC Red list Same 10 km square
as the site 1981-1984
Song Thrush BoCC Red list, UK and
local BAP 1.4km south 2009
Skylark BoCC Red list, UK and
local BAP
Same 10 km square
as the site 1988-1991
Barn swallow BoCC Amber list Same 10 km square
as the site 1988-1991
Spotted flycatcher BoCC Red list, UK BAP Same 2km square as
the site
Between
2004-2009
Tree pipit BoCC Red list, UK BAP 2km west Between
2004-2009
Wood warbler BoCC Red list, UK BAP 4km west Between
2004-2009
Yellowhammer BoCC Red list, UK BAP Same 10km square as
the site
Between
1968-1972
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
14 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Table 5: Plant records within 2 km of the site
Table 6: Invertebrate records with 2 km of the site
Invertebrates Protection Approximate
distance from site
Year of
Record
Wall butterfly UK BAP Same 2km square as
the site Between 1690-2004
Small heath UK BAP Same 2km square as
the site Between 1690-2004
Cinnabar UK BAP Within 3km south 2007
Table 7: Amphibian records within 2 km of the site
Amphibians Protection Approximate
distance from site
Year of
Record
Toad UK BAP Same 10km square as
the site 2005
Great crested newt European protected, UK
and local BAP;
7.5km south,
same 10km square as the site
1985,
1968
Table 8: Reptile records within 2 km of the site
WCA = Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 as amended; UK BAP = UK Biodiversity Action Plan; LBAP = Local
Biodiversity Action Plan; NBAP – National BAP; BoCC = Birds of Conservation Concern
Plants British Red Data List
Category
Approximate
distance from site
Year of
Record
Birds nest
(Monotropa hypopitys) Endangered, UK BAP
Same 10km square as
the site
Between
1987-1999
Caraway
(Carum carvi) Endangered, UK BAP
Same 10km square as
the site 1964
Red star thistle
(Centaurea calcitrapa)
Critically endangered, UK
BAP
Same 10km square as
the site
Between
1950-1999
Pennyroyal
(Mentha pulegium) Endangered, UK BAP
Same 10km square as
the site
Between
1950-1999
Stinking goosefoot
(Chenopodium vulvaria) Endangered, UK BAP
Same 10km square as
the site
Between
1950-1999
Reptiles Protection Approximate
distance from site Year of Record
Slow worm Partially protected under the WCA Schedule 5
3.2km east 1968
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
15 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Phase 1 Habitat Survey
3.7 Appendix A shows a Phase 1 habitat map of the site, with Target Notes. A list of
plant species identified on the site is included in Appendix C. Appendix B shows a
plan of the site, with Target Notes associated with the buildings and man-made
structures on the site that were assessed for bat roosting potential.
Limitations and Assumptions
3.8 The baseline conditions reported and assessed in this document represent those
identified at the time of the survey. The full plant species list (Appendix C) was based
on the current site visit. The survey was conducted in September, which is an
optimal time for Phase 1 surveys. All areas of the site were accessible on the day of
the survey.
Target Notes (Buildings)
3.9 The following Target Notes are associated with the numerous disused buildings on
the site (see Appendix B for locations). The plan in Appendix B was originally
produced by the East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust in 1996. The buildings in the
following Target Note descriptions are numbered and named to correspond with the
plan. It should be noted that not all of the buildings could be accessed internally
during the survey due to access or health and/or safety issues.
Building 1
Brynbella Suite OPD
A two-storey brick building with a flat roof. Externally, the structure was well-sealed
with no gaps recorded in the brickwork or around the window and door frames.
Internally, the roof contained a void created by a suspended ceiling. Some ceiling
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
16 JBA 11/263 October 2011
tiles were missing which allowed the void to be inspected for bat roost potential
(BRP). The building was considered to have no BRP.
Building 2
Medical Gas Store
A single-storey storage building constructed of stone. It had a flat, felt roof with
timber fascias which were partially rotten. There were also ventilation grilles in the
side walls which could potentially provide internal access for bats. The building could
not be accessed at the time of the survey, though potential for use by bats was
considered to be low.
Building 3
Wards 1 and 2, Hospice, X-Ray, Pharmacy, Offices
A three-storey stone building with a pitched roof which was finished with slates.
Externally, the building was well-sealed with no gaps recorded in the stonework and
limited slate damage. Lower window frames were boarded which could provide
limited opportunities for small numbers of crevice-roosting species, such as
pipistrelles. The loft space was accessed internally and was totally dark – indicating
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
17 JBA 11/263 October 2011
no bat access possibilities into the main void. The length of the roof was sectioned
by internal fire break doors. The roof was lined with sarking boards which could
provide roosting opportunities underneath the external slates.
Building 5
Operating Theatre
A single-storey, brick built structure with a lead covered roof. The building was well-
sealed and no access points that could be used by bats.
Building 6 & 7
Wards 3 and 4 and Medical Records
A three-storey building of similar construction to Building 3. Internally, the roof was
timber lined and lagged. Externally, the structure was well-sealed, although a couple
of access points were recorded under the eaves which could be used by roosting
bats. Boarded windows provided potential for occasional crevice-roosting species,
though no opportunities for more significant roosts were noted.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
18 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Building 10
Physiotherapy and Elderly Day Unit
A more modern, brick built structure with a hipped roof, finished with slates.
Access to the building was not available at the time of the survey, though there
were limited potential but access points noted externally.
Building 11
General and Other Stores
Stone built structures with pitched roofs, finished with slates. Grills to the rear
provided access for bats. Boundary dry-stone walls held gaps suitable for
roosting bats. The emergency generator had a roof void which was partially
damaged. This series of buildings were partially voided, though no access was
available. Felt lining would provide crevice-roosting opportunities, though the
slates were tight-fitting and access was limited.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
19 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Building 13
Garage and General Store
Single-storey building constructed from bricks and stone. The roof was pitched
and tiled with no lining. The northern half of the building had a suspended ceiling
and was partially lined with plaster-board. There were very high levels of bird
activity, mainly from swallows which were likely to have nested this year, within
the structure.
Building 14
Visitors Toilets
Single-storey stone structure with a pitched roof finished with slates. Internally,
the roof was timber lined.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
20 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Building 15
Electrical Sub-Station
Single-storey stone building with a hipped slate roof and vented ridge tiles. The
small, flat-roofed extension (brick with rendering) had a well-sealed flat felt roof
and wooden fascias.
Building 16
Administration
A two-storey, stone built structure with a pitched roof finished with well-sealed
slates. The lower level windows were boarded providing potential roosting
opportunities. Access was available into the underground heating ducts which
were potentially suitable and accessible for hibernating bats: no signs of bats
were found, though the whole network could not be accessed. There were also
access points under the eaves and between a few lifted slates. Internally, the
roof space was mainly unlined and open: Though access for bats was possible
under the eaves, no signs of past or present use by bats were found. One part of
the roof could not be accessed due to a false ceiling.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
21 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Building 17
Bus Shelter – No BRP
Building 18
Doctors House – Staff Accommodation
Two-storey, brick built house with a well-sealed tiled roof. The lower level
windows were boarded. The structure was generally well-sealed. No internal
access was available at the time of the survey. Small gaps at the gable ends may
have provided access to the roof void.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
22 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Building 19
Salt Store
Walled structure with no roof. The store was full of assorted waste and debris
Building 20
Mortuary
Stone built structure with a hipped slate roof. The building was well-sealed with a
small roof void. Access was available through a small loft hatch to the loft space,
which was low, dusty and cluttered. No signs of bats and limited BRP.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
23 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Building 21
Estates Department Store
Brick built structure with a flat roof. No access points for bats.
Building 22
Visitors Toilets
Brick built toilet block with a pitched roof finished with tiles. Internally, the roof
was lined with sarking felt. No signs of bats with a clean, loft space: Fully
accessible during the survey.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
24 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Building 23
Estates Maintenance Workshops
A single-storey, slate roofed building constructed from stone. The doorways to
the front had been bricked-up and the windows boarded. Internally, the slate roof
was unlined and open (no roof void). No BRP. The building was light inside die to
skylights.
Building 24
Linen Services, Joiners Workshop
A single-storey, slate roofed building constructed from stone. The walls were
well-sealed. Slate roof was generally well sealed to the front though there were
some lifted and broken tiles – particularly around the broken skylights to the
back. The roof was lined access for bats was possible between the wooden lining
and the slates. Access to the buildings was not available at the time of the
survey.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
25 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Building 26
Garages
Concrete garages in a poor state of repair. Open-fronted with a partially intact
corrugated asbestos roof. No BRP.
Building 27
Boiler House
Internally, the building was very light due to roof windows. Lined roof offered
limited roosting opportunities between the tiles and internal cladding: No roof
void.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
26 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Building 28
Central Kitchen, Staff Dining Room
Stone-built catering building with limited roof voids and a number of false ceilings
which could not be inspected in detail due to access limitations. Boarding to the
lower windows could provide opportunities for roosting pipistrelles. There was
good potential for bats to be able to enter the buildings due to damaged roof and
slates, stripped lead, and ventilation grills on external walls. No droppings or
signs of bats were found.
Building 29
Walkway
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
27 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Building 30
Wards 8, 9, 10 and 11
Suspended ceilings – broken in many places and heavily used by pigeons. Large
gaps in roof and broken slates. Access to the loft space was unsafe.
Building 32
Hospice Accommodation Annexe
Stone built building with many missing slates on the damaged roof. Potential
access for bats. The adjoining ‘pre-fab’ building was fully boarded with a flat roof.
Neither building could be accessed for a detailed inspection at the time of the
survey.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
28 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Building 33
Hospice Accommodation
Stone building with a slate roof containing numerous broken tiles. Boarded lower
level windows and doors. The building was not surveyed internally due to
presence of asbestos. However, the cellars were inspected: these could be
accessed by bats through missing external drainage slabs and ventilation bricks.
The cellars had potential to be used by hibernating bats: stone walled with cracks
and crevices suitable for use by bats, high humidity, extensive underground
heating duct network and a series of storage rooms which could provide a variety
of thermal niches. A thorough examination of all accessible areas was
conducted.
Building 34
Gardeners Store
Brick and stone built structure. No roof left. No BRP.
Building 40
Gas Meter House
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
29 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Flat roofed stone building. Low BRP
Building 41
Supplies Holding Store
Building 50
Ward 1 Boiler House:
Access was not available on the day of the survey, but the building had low BRP
due to a well-sealed flat roof and no obvious access for bats.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
30 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Target Notes
3.10 The following Target Notes relate to other features within the site boundary such
as vegetated habitats. The Target Note locations are shown on the Phase 1
Habitat plan in Appendix A.
Target Note 1
An area of rough grassland containing Timothy Phleum pratense, Yorkshire fog
Holcus lanatus, ragwort Senecio jacobaea, broad-leaved dock Rumex
obtusifolius, Crocosmia sp., bramble Rubus fruticosus and creeping buttercup
Ranuculus repens. Mammal tracks and scat (likely fox) noted. To the western
boundary there was a shrub border containing Rhododendron sp. and willow
Salix sp. To the east, a mature beech Fagus sylvatica with low-medium BRP and
semi-mature ash Fraxinus excelsior and holly Ilex aquifolium with no BRP.
Target Note 2
Mature ash tree with medium BRP.
Target Note 3
Stone wall along the western site boundary. Well-sealed.
Target Note 4
Pocket of rough grassland with limited potential to provide foraging habitat for
reptiles and small mammals.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
31 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Target Note 5
Line of Acer sp., ash and Poplar Populus sp. trees with low BRP. Rhododendron
sp. hedge to the north.
Target Note 6
Hedge containing beech and occasional crab apple Malus sylvestris and Prunus
sp. Approximately five metres tall. It had previously been managed but not
recently.
Target Note 7
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
32 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Shrub border containing Rhododendron sp., redcurrant Ribes rubrum, Rosa sp.,
laurel Prunus laurocerasus, Holly, Lilac sp. and hawthorn Crataegus monogyna.
Crocosmia sp. was also present. The shrub border was very dense to the south
and was unmaintained.
Target Note 8
Mature Acer sp. – lifting bark. Low to medium BRP due to lifting bark, but no
cracks or crevices suitable for significant bat roosts.
Target Note 9
Himalayan balsam Impatiens glandulifera growing between the road and kerb.
Target Note 10
Block of woodland – mainly Scots pine Pinus sylvestris and sycamore Acer
pseudoplatanus with some holly, ash, rowan Sorbus aucuparia, elder Sambucus
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
33 JBA 11/263 October 2011
nigra and Rhododendron sp. Ground cover was mainly pine needles with some
male fern Dryopteris filix-mas, nettle Urtica dioica and Ribes sp.
Target Note 11
Railed walkway with concrete steps.
Target Note 12
Stand of Japanese knotweed Fallopia japonica.
Target Note 13
Tarmac area and scattered rubble piles with high ruderal colonisation. Dominated
by Himalayan balsam. Other species include; common knapweed Centaurea
nigra, red bartsia Odontites vernus, mosses, Willowherb Epilobium sp., ribwort
plantain Plantago lanceolata, broad-leaved dock, Yorkshire fog, spear thistle
Cirsium vulgare, daisy, annual meadow grass Poa annua, ragwort, bramble,
cleavers Galium aparine, Fuschia sp., grey willow Salix cinerea, creeping
buttercup and hogweed Heracleum sphondylium.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
34 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Target Note 14
Wet woodland (very damp in places towards the north) – mainly ash, willow salix
sp., hawthorn, birch Betula sp., hazel Corylus avellana, oak Quercus robur, larch
Larix decidua, sycamore, horse chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum, alder Alnus
glutinosa and poplar. Ground flora included creeping buttercup Ranuculus
repens, nettles, mosses, Himalayan balsam, Ribes sp. and enchanters
nightshade Circaea lutetiana. No trees with BRP were recorded.
Target Note 15
Horse chestnut and sycamore dominant to the far eastern boundary. One horse
chestnut had a split trunk creating a cavity which had low potential to be used by
bats (open to the elements).
Target Note 16
Mature sycamore/maples – medium BRP for individual roosting bats due to lifting
bark.
Target Note 17
Horse chestnut and ash with medium BRP.
Target Note 18
Steep slope with some mature trees, mainly sycamore, horse chestnut, ash and
maple. Dense laurel to the west with Rhododendron sp., raspberry Rubus
idaeus, Ribes sp. nettles and ash.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
35 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Target Note 19
Small stand (5m x 5m) of Japanese knotweed on made-up ground.
Target Note 20
Access track – lined with mature ash, sycamore and lime Tillia sp. Some
contained cavities, rot holes and other features which could support roosting
bats. Medium to high BRP.
Target Note 21
Raised garden – heavily choked with bramble.
Target Note 22
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
36 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Disused holes – potentially badger due to significant earth movement and size of
D-shaped holes. All of the holes had collapsed, were overgrown and had clearly
not been used over the past 12 months.
Target Note 23
Previous amenity grassland lawn area. Main grass species were Yorkshire fog
and bents Agrostis sp. Also present in lower quantities: birds foot trefoil Lotus
corniculatus, selfheal Prunella vulgaris, forget-me-not Myositis arvensis, creeping
buttercup, common chickweed Stellaria media and compact rush Juncus
conglomerates.
Target Note 24
Amenity grassland – now unmanaged and overgrown, with ornamental shrubs
including lilac and Rhododendron sp., a mature poplar and declining ash (no
BRP).
Target Note 25
Boundary wall (approximately 2m high). large stand of Rhododendron sp. and
two multi-stemmed ash trees by wall.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
37 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Target Note 26
Rough grass area (previously amenity). Trees to the eastern boundary: laurel,
Salix sp., holly, beech, Rhododendron sp., sycamore, lime, horse chestnut, ash.
Low to medium BRP in mature specimens. To the west, scrub and semi-mature
ash trees (no BRP).
Target Note 27
A former terraced garden – now overgrown and unmanaged, becoming rough
grassland. Species present included creeping buttercup, Yorkshire fog, bramble,
mosses, yew Taxus baccata, heather Calluna vulgaris, tufted vetch Vicia cracca,
Crocosmia sp., compact rush, and lady’s mantle Alchemilla mollis. Boundary
shrubs and trees included beech, Prunus sp., laurel, Rhododendron sp. and
dogwood Cornus sanguinea.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
38 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Target Note 28
Grass and ruderal boundary – ruderal species have encroached this now
unmanaged area, including creeping thistle Circium arvense, rosebay willowherb
Epilobium angustifolium and nettles. Mature trees included cypress Cupressus
sp., sycamore and poplar (all Low BRP).
Target Note 29
Rough grass with a privet Ligustrum ovalifolium hedge to the west.
Target Note 30
Steep bank between two car parks. Sycamore, ash, Salix sp., bramble, rosebay
willowherb and Himalayan balsam. A line of mature Scots pine were present
adjacent to the road boundary with the lower car park.
Target Note 31
Belt of Laylandii and Scots pine along road boundary.
Target Note 32
Vegetated boundary with union road. Mature sycamore, ash, Scots pine (low
BRP).
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
39 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Target Note 33
Tarmaced access road. Walled to the north and railed to the south with hedges
beyond the site boundary.
Target Note 34
Semi-mature cherry trees on a grass verge between the hedge and the road. No
BRP.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
40 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Target Note 35
Missing stones covering surface water drains and service ducts: since vandalism,
this now provided access into underground voids where there could be
opportunities for hibernating bats.
Protected Species – Results and Evaluation
Flora and habitats
3.11 The single largest habitat on the site was the area of wet woodland in the south
eastern half. The woodland was mainly broadleaved, dominated by ash and also
including oak, larch, sycamore, horse chestnut, birch, willow, hawthorn, Scots pine
and hazel. The northern areas of the woodland were very damp in places and stands
of alder were present. Under the current proposals, the woodland will not be directly
impacted by the development. However, it was considered that it could be enhanced
for wildlife and amenity value by implementing a woodland management plan which
could include enhancements for birds and bats.
3.12 The hedgerow within the site boundary (see Target Notes 6) had been planted for
amenity value and was species poor (dominated by beech with occasional crab
apple and blackthorn). It will not be classified as ‘important’ under the Hedgerow
Regulations 1997, but could provide habitat for nesting birds and small mammals.
Potential for use as a linear landscape feature, enhancing movement of wildlife
through the site, is limited due to the short length of the hedge and the lack of habitat
at either end.
3.13 A number of small grassland and ruderal habitats were located amongst the former
hospital buildings. These had previously been areas amenity grassland which had
become dominated by coarse grasses and ruderal species once mowing
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
41 JBA 11/263 October 2011
management had ceased. These areas were not floristically diverse and did not
support any rare species. There was an abundance of coarse grassland habitats in
the surrounding landscape and therefore, it was considered that the loss of these
habitats would not have a significant impact in the local landscape context.
3.14 The desk study highlighted records of five grassland and woodland species, though
several of these were potentially historic records (i.e. recorded between 1950 and
1999) and none were recorded during the survey which was conducted at a time of
year when these species would have been visible.
3.15 Four Wildlife and Countryside Act Schedule 9 species, Japanese knotweed,
Crocosmia sp., Rhododendron sp. and Himalayan balsam, were recorded growing in
scattered locations around the site (see Target Notes 9, 12, 13 and 19). These
should be treated and disposed of appropriately prior to the commencement of any
ground works to avoid infringing legislation regarding spread of Schedule 9 species.
Bats
3.16 There were several mature oak, ash, horse chestnut, sycamore, poplar and lime
trees around the site which had mostly low to medium, and occasionally high bat
roost potential. They exhibited features such as lifting bark which could potentially be
used by individual, transient roosting bats; and cracks, crevices and rot holes which
could be used by a more significant roost, such as hibernation or maternity roosts.
Trees within the woodland were limited in terms of features suitable for use by
roosting bats. Many of the numerous buildings in the north-western half of the site
provided bat access opportunities due to their poor state of repair. Most of the roof
voids were accessed, though health and safety issues limited this in some buildings,
and all of the buildings were inspected externally. No positive evidence of past or
present use by roosting bats was found.
3.17 The site was dominated by woodland and buildings, with areas of grassland, ruderals
and tree and shrub planting, which provided moderate quality foraging habitat for
bats.
3.18 There are recent records of seven bat species within 10km of the site: Soprano and
common pipistrelles have been recorded within half a kilometre of the site boundary.
It was considered that species such as pipistrelle Pipistrellus sp. and noctule
Nyctalus noctula, which were identified in the desk study, could be using habitats
around the site for foraging and commuting. Much of the site is well lit with security
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
42 JBA 11/263 October 2011
lights, which make the area less suitable for some species, such as brown long-eared
bats, though other species, such as pipistrelles and noctules are often feed on the
insects attracted to lights. Leisler’s, Natterer’s, Daubentons and whiskered / Brandt’s
bats were also identified within 10km of the site. Leisler’s bats are a predominantly
woodland species roosting mainly within trees, so are more likely to be found
foraging and roosting within the woodlands in the surrounding area due to a lack of
features on the trees in the woodland on the site. Natterer’s and whiskered / Brandt’s
bats are known for using roosts in buildings, and the buildings on site would be
suitable for individual roosting bats of these species. Daubenton’s bats tend to be
associated with water and as such are unlikely to be found roosting or foraging on the
site.
3.19 Further activity survey is recommended (a dusk and dawn) to assess bat activity
levels at the site: though this will now be late in the season, it should pick up any late
season mating or pre-hibernation swarming activity and provide a general indication
of the level of bat activity on the site.
3.20 A tree-climbing survey is recommended to assess some of the potential roosting
features which could not be inspected fully from the ground. The climber should hold
a Natural England bat licence and suitably NPTC qualified.
Reptiles
3.21 The site generally had low potential to support a population of reptiles, dominated by
buildings and woodland, with only small, isolated areas of grassland and ruderal
habitat suitable for foraging reptiles. Areas of shorter vegetation and bare ground
associated with the buildings, which had been used for vehicle and pedestrian
access, provided potential basking opportunities for species such as common lizard.
3.22 There are historical records of slow worms within 4km of the site. Due to past
management of the site, it was considered that the rough grassland areas provided
low potential to support reptiles, and further survey is not necessary. However due to
the low possibility that the rough grassland areas could be used by occasional slow
worms, these should be cleared under ecological supervision to minimise any
potential harm to any reptiles which might be present. This will involve reduction in
the quality of the habitat through strimming prior to clearance.
Birds
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
43 JBA 11/263 October 2011
3.23 A visual survey of bird activity and suitable nesting habitat was carried out, in order
to determine if any areas would be suitable for WCA Schedule 1 birds, Birds of
Conservation Concern or other common and widespread nesting birds. The
woodland, trees, shrubs and hedgerows on the site provided potential nesting and
foraging opportunities for birds. The areas of coarse grassland provided potential
shelter and nesting opportunities for ground nesting birds such as skylark. Habitats
within the site such as coarse grassland and trees are abundant locally, and the area
of woodland will not be directly impacted by the proposed development. Therefore, it
was considered unlikely that protected, BAP or rare birds would be significantly
impacted by the proposed development.
3.24 Bird species observed during the field survey included goldfinch Carduelis carduelis,
magpie Pica pica and swallow Hirundo rustica. Swallows were recorded nesting in
Building 13 and 11.
3.25 The site provided potential habitat for a range of nesting widespread and common
species. BAP and red-listed species such as tree sparrow, yellowhammer, wood and
warbler, which were identified in the desk study, could use habitats such as those
within the site boundary. Other species identified in the desk study such as ring ouzel
Turdus torquatus are moorland and upland specialists unlikely to be found on the
site.
3.26 Trees proposed for retention, should be suitably protected from harm during the
construction works following British Standard: BS5837.
3.27 Site clearance and works proposed to any buildings, trees or hedges should be
conducted outside the main bird breeding season (which is March until the end of
August). If vegetation removal is necessary between these dates, an ecologist
should survey the site for active bird nests immediately prior to works. If nests are
identified, there may be a delay in the clearance of some vegetation until all young
birds have fledged.
Amphibians
3.28 There were no ponds or waterbodies on the site. There was a small reservoir
approximately 150m south of the site which is unlikely to provide suitable habitat for
protected breeding great crested newts.
3.29 The woodland and areas of coarse grassland provided moderate quality habitat for
amphibians such as great crested newts and toads in their terrestrial phase.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
44 JBA 11/263 October 2011
3.30 There are records of great crested newts within 7.5 km of the site in 1985 and toads
within the same 10km grid square in 2005.
3.31 Although there was a reservoir within 500m of the site to the south, there were no
ponds on, or to the north of the site. This reduced the likelihood of amphibians
dispersing across the site in search of water bodies to breed, or woodland for
hibernation. There is potential for amphibians to use the woodland in the south-east
of the site during their terrestrial phase. However, the woodland is not being directly
impacted by the proposed development and therefore any amphibians using it would
not be significantly impacted. The Haslingden Road also forms an ecological barrier
which further reduces the likelihood of amphibians dispersing onto the site from the
south. The grassland habitats on the site were of low suitability for amphibians –
limited cracks and rabbit holes which could be used for hibernation, and fragmented
from other potential foraging areas and breeding habitat by buildings and hard-
standing. Therefore, further survey is not necessary.
3.32 Precautionary clearance of the grassland habitats, which is already recommended to
minimise any potential harm to reptiles, will serve the same purpose for any
amphibians which might be present.
Invertebrates
3.33 The areas of grassland, amenity shrub and tree planting, hedgerows and woodland
provided potential habitat for common invertebrates.
3.34 The data search highlighted records of the wall Lasiommata megera and small heath
Coenonympha pamphilus butterflies, and cinnabar Tyria jacobaeae moth (all UK
BAP species) within 3km of the site. Food plant grasses (meadow grasses) and
ragwort were present, as were basking and nectaring opportunities. However, due to
the abundance of similar habitats within the surrounding area, it was not considered
that the local conservation status of invertebrates would be significantly affected by
the proposed development.
3.35 Habitats within the site were not considered of suitable structure or diversity to
support a significant assemblage of BAP, rare or protected invertebrates. No further
survey is necessary.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
45 JBA 11/263 October 2011
Hedgehogs, hares and badgers
3.36 There were signs of past badger activity on the site in the form of several disused
holes (see Target Note 22). However, these holes had collapsed and were
overgrown, indicating that had not been used for some years. No snuffle holes,
latrines or other field signs indicating the presence of badgers were recorded.
3.37 There are records of brown hares and hedgehogs within 10km of the site from 2006
and 1978 respectively. There was limited suitable habitat for brown hares on the site
and it was considered unlikely that they would be significantly impacted by the
development. There was suitable habitat for hedgehogs on the site. However, the
woodland area will remain undeveloped providing a safe refuge for any which may
be present within the construction zone. It was also considered that sensitive
landscape plans could enhance the site for hedgehogs post development.
3.38 There are records of red squirrel within 6km from 2008. However, the woodland area
is unlikely to support this species due to being small and relatively isolated from
other woodland habitats in the surrounding landscape. Again, the woodland will not
be directly impacted by the development and it was therefore considered unlikely
that the local conservation status of red squirrels would be impacted either.
3.39 Prior to the commencement of any ground works, it is recommended that a
precautionary badger survey is undertaken to confirm the status of the disused sett
and to ensure that badgers have not colonised the site in the interim.
Dormice
3.40 The woodland on the site provided low quality potential habitat for dormice. The
woodland structure was poor, with limited shrub layer providing access to the canopy
and limited variety and quantity of dormouse food resources. There are no records
of dormice within 10km of the site and connectivity to further suitable habitat within
the local area is poor.
3.41 No further survey is recommended.
Other Protected, BAP or Rare Species
3.42 There were no significant water courses within the site or within 50m of the site
boundary. It was considered unlikely that species such as otter and/or water vole
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
46 JBA 11/263 October 2011
would be impacted by the proposed development. The site was not considered
suitable to support any other protected, BAP or rare species.
4 Key Recommendations, Further Surveys and Precautionary Methods
4.1 Precautionary clearance of grassland habitats to be undertaken to minimise the risk
of potentially harming reptiles or amphibians.
4.2 Schedule 9 species Japanese knotweed, Crocosmia sp., Rhododendron sp. and
Himalayan balsam should be removed and disposed of appropriately prior to the
commencement of works on the site.
4.3 Badger survey to be undertaken prior to ground works to ensure the status of inactive
sett has not changed in the interim.
4.4 Precautionary clearance of the site, buildings, hedgerows and trees will be
necessary, as detailed in Section 3, to avoid infringing legislation which protects all
nesting birds.
4.5 Further survey of trees with bat roost potential, which could be impacted by the
development – either indirectly (lighting) or through felling, should be carried out by a
NE bat licenced and qualified tree climber.
4.6 Further bat surveys within the active bat season should be carried out prior to
demolition, to ensure that bats are not using the buildings. A further bat survey in
September (dusk and dawn) will identify any late season swarming, pre-hibernation
activity within cellars, and general foraging activity levels on the site.
5 Enhancement Recommendations
5.1 The following are suggestions that the client may wish to consider to enhance the
value of the site for wildlife. However, it should be noted that these suggestions are
not legally required for compensation of habitats or mitigation and may be revised
depending on the outcome of the further surveys.
5.2 The addition of four house sparrow terraces on the new buildings on site will provide
additional nesting opportunities for this BoCC red listed species which has been
recorded in the surrounding landscape. A further six standard bird boxes with a
variety of shaped and different sized entrance holes should be located within the
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
47 JBA 11/263 October 2011
woodland to attract a greater diversity of birds to nest. Boxes should be located
appropriately, out of direct sunlight, prevailing wind direction and close to vegetation.
Swallow boxes should be located under eaves of new builds, particularly those to the
north western boundary, to offset the loss of these nesting opportunities.
5.3 Connectivity in a landscape context should be considered at all stages of the design
process. Native tree and hedgerow planting around the site should be considered, to
create dispersal corridors, biodiversity linkages and enhance the existing connections
associated with the site.
5.4 A woodland management plan could be implimented to ecologically enhance the
woodland area.
5.5 Bat boxes or bricks could be installed in/on the new houses. Bat boxes need to be at
least 4m from the ground, out of direct sunlight and close to vegetation.
5.6 The inclusion of wildflower rich swards could enhance the area for invertebrates
including butterflies and bumble bees. These areas could also enhance the site for
birds and bats post development.
5.7 Native and/or wildlife attracting tree and shrub planting should be included in the
landscape design. This would enhance the area for birds, invertebrates and other
wildlife in the long-term. Trees and shrubs should be planted to encourage movement
through the site as well as providing habitat.
6 Conclusion
6.1 The site was considered to be of moderate ecological value, predominantly
consisting of woodland, derelict buildings, small areas of grassland and individual
trees and shrubs.
6.2 If key recommendations, as detailed in this report are undertaken – and any
subsequent recommendations followed, it was considered that the development
could proceed with minimal impact on the local conservation status of any protected,
BAP or rare species within the area.
6.3 It is also considered that by including some, or all, of the enhancement
recommendations, the site could be improved for local wildlife, post development.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
48 JBA 11/263 October 2011
7 References
Bat Surveys: Good Practice Guidelines 2007. Bat Conservation Trust, London.
Cheffings, C.M. & Farrell, L. (Eds), Dines, T.D., Jones, R.A., Leach, S.J., McKean,
D.R., Pearman, D.A., Preston, C.D., Rumsey, F.J., Taylor, I. 2005. The Vascular Plant
Red Data List for Great Britain. Species Status 7: 1-116. Joint Nature Conservation
Committee, Peterborough.
English Nature (2004). Guidelines for Developers. English Nature, Peterborough
English Nature (2001) Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines. English Nature
Froglife. 1999. Reptile Survey. An Introduction to Planning, Conduction and Interpreting
Surveys for Snake and Lizard Conservation. Froglife Advice Sheet 10. Froglife.
Gent, A.H. and Gibson, S.D., eds. 1998 Herpetofauna Workers’ Manual. Peterborough,
Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
Gregory, R. D. Wilkinson, N. I. Noble, D. G. Robinson, J. A. Brown A. F. Hughes, J.
Proctor, D .A. Gibbons, D. W. & Galbraith, C.A. (2007). The population status of birds
in the United Kingdom and Isle of Man: an analysis of conservation concern 2002-
2007. British Birds 95: 410-450.
JNCC (2010). Handbook for Phase 1 habitat survey: a technique for environmental
audit (revised reprint). JNCC: Peterborough.
Natural England (2011) Reptile Mitigation Guildines. NE 2011.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM), (1994). Planning Policy Statement 9. The
Stationery Office (TSO), London.
Stace, S. (1991). New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge. 2nd ed. (1997).
Web references
MAGIC: Designated area data downloaded from URL http://www.magic.gov.uk.html
(Accessed 4th October 2011).
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
49 JBA 11/263 October 2011
National Biodiversity Network: Protected species data downloaded from URL
http://data.nbn.org/interactive/map (Accessed 4th October 2011).
UK BAP www.ukbap.org.uk
Lancashire Local BAP http://www.lancspartners.org/lbap/biodiversity_action_plans.asp
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
JBA 11/263 50 October 2011
8 Appendices
Appendix A: Phase 1 habitat map
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
JBA 11/263 51 October 2011
Appendix B: Site plan showing building Target Note number locations
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
JBA 11/263 52 October 2011
Appendix C: Plant species list
Forbs
Common Name Scientific Name
Black knapweed Centaurea nigra
Broad leaved dock Rumex obtusifolius
Cleavers Galium aparine
Common bird’s-foot-trefoil Lotus corniculatus
Common ragwort Senecio jacobaea
Creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens
Daisy Bellis perennis
Enchanter’s nightshade Circaea lutetiana
Field forget-me-not Myosotis arvensis
Himalayan Balsam Impatiens glandulifera
Hogweed Heraclium sphondylium
Japanese knotweed Fallopia japonica
Lesser stitchwort Stellaria graminea
Montbretia Crocosmia x crocosmiiflora
Nettle Urtica dioica
Perennial sow-thistle Sonchus arvensis
Red bartsia Odontites vernus
Ribwort plantain Plantago lanceolata
Rosebay willowherb Chamerion angustifolium
Selfheal Prunella vulgaris
Spear thistle Cirsium vulgare
Tufted vetch Vicia cracca
Trees and shrubs
Common Name Scientific Name
Alder Alnus glustinosa
Apple Malus sp.
Ash Fraxinus excelsior
Beech Fagus sylvatica
Blackthorn Prunus spinosa
Bramble Rubus fruticosa
Buddleja Buddleja sp.
Cherry Prunus sp.
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
JBA 11/263 53 October 2011
Common lime Tilia x europaea
Common lilac Syringa vulgaris
Crab apple Malus sylvestris
Cypress Cupressus sp.
Dogwood Cornus sanguinea
Elder Sambucus nigra
Fuschia Fuschia sp.
Goat willow Salix caprea
Grey willow Salix cinerea
Hawthorn Crataegus monogyna
Hazel Corylus avellana
Heather Calluna vulgaris
Holly Ilex aquifolium
Horse chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum
Ivy Hedera helix
Larch Larix decidua
Laurel Prunus laurocerasus
Maple Acer sp.
Oak Quercus robur
Poplar Populus sp.
Privet Ligustrum Ovalifolium
Raspberry Rubus idaeus
Redcurrant Ribes rubrum
Rhododendron Rhododendron spp
Rose Rosa sp.
Rowan Sorbus aucuparia
Scots pine Pinus sylvestris
Silver birch Betula pendula
Sycamore Acer pseudoplatanus
Yew Taxus baccata
Grasses, sedges, rushes and ferns
Common Name Scientific Name
Annual meadow grass Poa annua
Cocksfoot Dactylus glomerata
Common male fern Dryopteris filix-mas
Compact rush Juncus conglomeratus
Creeping bent Agrostis stolonifera
False oat grass Arrhenatherum elatius
Timothy Phleum pratense
Tufted hairgrass Deschampsia cespitosa
Yorkshire fog Holcus lanatus
Former Rossendale Hospital Phase 1 Habitat Survey
JBA 11/263 54 October 2011
Appendix D: Relevant protected species legislation
Species Relevant Legislation Level of Protection
Badgers
o Protection of Badgers Act 1992 o Badgers are also protected by the Wild
Mammals (Protection) Act 1996
The Protection of Badgers Act (1992) makes it an
offence to intentionally or recklessly:
• Damage a badger sett or any part of it
• Destroy a badger sett
• Obstruct access to, or any entrance of a badger sett
• Disturb a badger whilst it is occupying a badger sett
Bats
o Full protection under the Wildlife and Countryside Act (WCA) (1981) (Listed on Schedule 5) - as amended
o Classified as European protected species under Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010
o Also protected by the Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1996
The WCA (1981) makes it an offence to:
• intentionally kill, injure, or take any species of bat
• intentionally or recklessly disturb bats
• intentionally or recklessly damage destroy or obstruct access to bat roosts
Birds
o Protection under the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981) as amended with the exception of some species listed in Schedule 2 of the Act
The WCA (1981) makes it an offence to (with
exceptions for certain species):
• Intentionally kill, injure or take any wild bird • Intentionally take, damage or destroy nests
in use or being built (including ground nesting birds)
• Intentionally take, damage or destroy eggs
Species listed on Schedule 1 of the WCA or their
dependant young are afforded additional protection
from disturbance whilst they are at their nests
Reptiles
o Partially protected by the Wildlife and Countryside Act
The WCA (1981) makes it an offence to:
• intentionally kill or injure these animals
• sell, offer for sale, advertise for sale, possess or transport for the purposes of selling any live or dead animals or part of these animals
Recommended