View
15
Download
1
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Periodization for MixedMartial ArtsLachlan P. James, MExercSc, MSportCoach,1,2 Vincent G. Kelly, BSc (Hons),1,3 and Emma M. Beckman, PhD1
1School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia; 2Schoolof Exercise and Biomedical Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia; and 3UQ SportAcademy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
A B S T R A C T
THE MIXED MARTIAL ARTIST RE-
QUIRES THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
BROAD SCOPE OF DIVERGENT
PHYSIOLOGICAL ABILITIES TO
COMPETE SUCCESSFULLY. TO
MINIMIZE ANY POTENTIAL INTER-
FERENCE EFFECTS AND OPTIMIZE
TRAINING ADAPTATIONS, A
PERIODIZED TRAINING PLAN IS
NEEDED TO MANAGE THE INTE-
GRATION OF THIS SPORT’S MANY
TRAINING STRESSORS. THIS ARTI-
CLE PROVIDES GUIDELINES AND
PRACTICAL EXAMPLES FOR THE
STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING
COACH.
Mixed martial arts (MMA) isa unique and complex com-bat sport which uses a wide
range of kicking, punching, and grap-pling techniques found in more tradi-tional martial arts such as kickboxing,wrestling, Brazilian jiu-jitsu and karate.Because of the diversity in theseattacking methods, a highly developedbroad scope of physical abilities isneeded to successfully compete. Awell-prepared mixed martial artist willneed to possess high levels of maximalstrength and strength endurance inaddition to the ability to express powerrepeatedly under loaded and unloadedconditions. Furthermore, the MMA ath-lete must have the physical resilience toabsorb frequent high-intensity collisions.Finally, the sport has high-intensity in-termittent endurance characteristics,thus it necessitates well-developed aer-obic and anaerobic capacities (36,60).
This combination of qualities makesMMA unique from many other sports.
An effective training plan should aimto develop optimally all these physicalproperties to ensure optimal prepara-tion for competition. However, distinctmechanisms underpin adaptations tothe varied training stimuli used todevelop these abilities (38,46,61,68,88).
Specifically, the divergent adaptationsstemming from endurance and resis-tance training have been reported tocause conflict with strength and powerdevelopment, limiting the extent ofadaptation (39,56), in addition toincreasing the risk of overtraining(20,31). This makes the developmentof an effective training plan for MMAa complex undertaking. To address this,a periodization framework is needed tomanage these training stressors in a waythat facilitates the effective developmentof each characteristic, manages thefatigue generated from the trainingstress, and allows the fighter to peakat predetermined points throughoutthe training plan.
Despite an increasing number of inves-tigations into strength and condition-ing methods for MMA, none havepresented a detailed periodizationframework which addresses the criticalissue of interference effects from con-current endurance and resistance train-ing (5,6,17,55,78). The purpose of thisarticle is to provide the strength andconditioning coach with a frameworkby which the major training tasks canbe integrated. A detailed periodizedtraining plan for MMAwill be providedas a practical example to guide both the
strength and conditioning practitionerand sports-specific coach.
MIXED MARTIAL ARTS
MMA is a combat sport incorporatinga variety of striking and grappling tech-niques. Fights are won by knockout,submission, referee intervention, ora judges’ decision at the end of the reg-ulation time. Typical amateur bouts arescheduled for three 3-minute rounds,whereas professional and higher-levelamateur bouts are often three 5-minuterounds. The highest level of competi-tion, professional main event fightscomprise five 5-minute rounds. Allrounds at each level of competitionare separated by 1 minute of rest.
AEROBIC AND ANAEROBICCAPACITY
The predominant contributor to energysupply after 3 minutes of activity is theaerobic system. Thus, the length of anMMA round and minimal recoverybetween rounds necessitates the athleteto draw heavily on aerobic metabolism(36). However, each round consists ofintermittent activity expressed as a highintensity to lower intensity (Hi:Lo) ratioof 1:2 to 1:4 (28) (Figure 1). Sucha work-to-recovery interval necessitatesengagements from both fast and slowglycolysis in addition to oxidativemetabolism (15). Therefore, physiolog-ically, MMA is intermittent in naturerequiring multiple high-intensity efforts,which underpin its high-intensity
KEY WORDS :
mixed martial arts; combat sport;periodization; concurrent training
VOLUME 35 | NUMBER 6 | DECEMBER 2013 Copyright � National Strength and Conditioning Association34
intermittent endurance foundation (84).Amtmann et al. (7) measured postboutlactate levels reaching 18.7 and 20.7mmol/L for bouts lasting regulationtime. These levels are similar to thosefound in the grappling sports of wres-tling (70) and judo (27). Because the endproduct of the fast glycolytic pathway islactate, it can be concluded that mixedmartial artists rely heavily on this sys-tem over the duration of a bout, partic-ularly during brief grappling battleslasting approximately 30–90 seconds(15).
An investigation of the work-to-restratio of the component sports ofMMA suggests that grappling artshave higher work-to-rest ratios thanstriking sports. A ratio of 3:1 has beendetermined for both judo (64) andwrestling (70), whereas striking artssuch as muay Thai and taekwondoexperience work-to-rest ratios of 2:3(79) and 1:6 (59), respectively. Thus,it seems as though MMA possessesan intensity that falls between grap-pling and striking sports. However,the decisive nature of MMA grapplingencounters (28) and the high bloodlactate levels suggest that grappling,rather than striking, represents thegreater proportion of engagements inMMA. In addition to these findings, ithas been reported that approximately77% of fights were decided duringhigh-intensity striking or grappling se-quences either standing or on theground, lasting 8–14 seconds (28).Because the ATP-PC and fast glycolysisare the primary systems used for high-intensity expressions lasting 6 to 30
seconds (15), it can be concluded thatthe repeated engagement of these sys-tems fuel decisive encounters in MMA.
STRENGTH
The grappling battles experienced byMMA athletes resemble that of wres-tling and thus require expressions ofboth dynamic and isometric strength(53). Del Vecchio et al. (28) determinedthat approximately 50% of fights endedduring ground fighting action. Thus, thedevelopment of this characteristic cancontribute to the performance enhance-ment of a decisive MMA skill. More-over, strength forms the foundationfor the development of power (23,24),and significant improvements in athleticperformance have been well docu-mented as a result of training inducedincreases in strength (22,50,85,90,91).
POWER
The delivery of strikes includingpunches and kicks require rapid applica-tion of force under unloaded conditions.Aagaard et al. (3) noted that a punch isdelivered in 50–250 milliseconds, thus,exceptional rate of force development(RFD) capabilities are required. In theonly investigation using elite MMA ath-letes, McGill et al. (62) determined thata rapid contraction-relaxation strategy oftrunk musculature is used when per-forming powerful punching and kickingactions. Additionally, when executingtakedowns, forces applied at high ratesagainst the mass of an opponent arerequired. Thus, the expression of powerunder loaded conditions is also a keyelement of MMA. In the sport of rugby
league that has physiological character-istics similar toMMA including frequenttackling collisions with high-intensityintermittent endurance demands, itwas determined that the ability toexpress power under loaded conditionsdifferentiated elite from subelite players(8,10,12). It is possible, then, that powermay also be the defining physiologicalability of high-level MMA athletes.However, further investigations areneeded to determine the characteristicsof elite mixed martial artists.
PHYSIOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONSTO CONCURRENT TRAINING
A successful MMA athlete will need toemploy a number of training tasks overthe course of a training plan to developthese capacities. Energy system condi-tioning and resistance training in addi-tion to technical and tactical sessionsof varying intensities will be the keyfactors manipulated to achieve perfor-mance gains. Underlying the effectiveintegration of these tasks are theirchronic and acute physiological re-sponses. Because endurance-trainingstimuli can illicit differing and conflict-ing adaptations to resistance trainingtasks, close attention must be paid tothe management of these distinctmodalities to minimize interferenceeffects. Although there have been noinvestigations into the periodizationof an MMA training plan, there isa depth of research that has examinedthe effects of concurrent enduranceand resistance training programs.Understanding this research will assistin the design of an effective periodized
Figure 1. Time-motion breakdown from a collection of regional level MMA bouts (28).
Strength and Conditioning Journal | www.nsca-scj.com 35
training plan to manage the trainingstressors of MMA.
Reports of interference effects stemmingfrom the concurrent training of aerobicand resistance training modalities arewell documented in the scientific litera-ture (25,30,39,41,45,48,52,56). A seminalstudy by Hickson (45) investigated theeffects of concurrent strength and endur-ance training in untrained individuals. Bythe end of the 10-week training program,strength levels were significantly lower inthe combined strength and endurancegroup compared with the strength onlygroup. Consistent with these findings,Rønnestad et al. (76) found significantlygreater increases in strength, thigh cross-sectional area, jump squat performance,and RFD in subjects performing strengthtraining only when compared with eliteendurance athletes performing concur-rent strength and endurance-training.For the MMA athlete, this suggests thathigh volumes of low-intensity aerobic-based trainingwill certainly limit the abil-ity to enhance strength and power levels.This effect would be particularly appar-ent if the MMA athlete was undertakinga large workload of physiologically non-specific continuous conditioning at a lowintensity for an extended duration, other-wise known as long slow distance (LSD)(15) in conjunction with strength-powertraining. However, because aerobic andanaerobic capacity are important quali-ties for the mixed martial artist, alternatetraining methods should be applied thatpromote these adaptations while form-ing a more fitting complement to thedevelopment of key strength and powerabilities. Conversely, the inclusion ofresistance training has been reported toimprove performance in endurance ath-letes (13,44,49,65,66,71,75,77,80) in addi-tion to improvements in maximalstrength (1,2,14,44) and RFD (1,2). Thus,further to the well-understood improve-ments in strength and power, the inclu-sion of resistance training to an MMAtraining plan has the potential toenhance endurance performance. How-ever, caution must be applied by manag-ing the overall training workload toallow for the incorporation of this addi-tional training factor. Taken together,
this suggests that technical, tactical,energy system, and resistance trainingshould be prioritized in a way that con-siders these effects. The prioritizationwill be dependent on the stage of thetraining plan and the individual abilitiesof the athlete. Additionally, strategiesthat promote aerobic, anaerobic,strength, and power adaptationswith minimal interference should beused.
CONCURRENT ENDURANCE ANDRESISTANCE TRAINING
These findings highlight the complexityfaced when developing the MMAathlete. A framework is needed to mini-mize these interference effects and facili-tating the concurrent development ofopposing physiological abilities. Garcıa-Pallares et al. (35) proposed a block peri-odization strategy for the concurrentdevelopment of strength, power, andendurance that considers the effects oftraining modalities at the central andperipheral level. To account for this,hypertrophic resistance training waspaired with lower-intensity interval train-ing (LIIT) occurring at 75–85% VO2maxin a training block, whereas strength andpower development were paired withhigh-intensity interval training (HIIT).Underpinning this framework is the sug-gestion that opposing physiological adap-tations occur at the peripheral levelbetween hypertrophy training andHIIT (56). Here, the high metabolicstress induced by HIIT would interferewith peripheral anatomical adaptations,whereas LIIT elicits primarily centraladaptations, and therefore poses lessinterference. In accordance with thismodel, the predominantly neural adap-tations to strength and power trainingare a more fitting complement to theperipheral adaptations of HIIT. Thisstrategy significantly improved endur-ance, strength, and power performancemarkers in high-level athletes (35).
Providing further support to the effec-tiveness of periodization in developingconflicting abilities are investigationsby Baker (9) and Baker and Newton(11). These studies demonstrated thatelite rugby league players coulddevelop strength and power over
a 4-year period (11) and maintain theseabilities over a 29-week competitiveseason with high volumes of aerobicand anaerobic activities. Moreover,subelite players were able to increasestrength with equally high levels ofconcurrent endurance training overa season (9) and further develop bothstrength and power over a 4 year-period (11). Although the frameworkwas not described, it was suggestedthat the periodization of this trainingincluding the sequencing of modalitiesand prioritization of training goals al-lowed for this effective concurrentdevelopment of endurance andstrength qualities (9,11).
These findings suggest that despiteconflicting mechanisms underpinningthe adaptations to various MMA train-ing modalities, it is feasible to developstrength, power, and endurance con-currently in athletes. However, poorlyorganizing these modalities will limitperformance gains. Thus, to effectivelyarrange these modalities and optimallyprepare the MMA athlete for compe-tition, a periodization frameworkshould be used.
PERIODIZATION OF AN MMAPROGRAM
The primary training factors of MMAcan be broadly classified as technical,tactical, conditioning, and resistancetraining. Table 1 shows an example ofhow these factors can be prioritizedacross a macrocycle. The classic modelof periodization suggests that nonspe-cific training like general conditioningbe introduced initially, with more spe-cific tactical and technical trainingoccurring in greater volumes as theevent approaches (73).
Caution is advised with the inclusionof continuous endurance training suchas LSD because of a lack of specificityto the intermittent nature of MMAand more severe impact on strengthand power development than intervaltraining strategies (15). Thus, LIIT ata 1:1 work-to-rest ratio should beapplied during the early stages ofthe training plan. The use of Garcıa-Pallares et al’s (35) model in pairing
Periodization for Mixed Martial Arts
VOLUME 35 | NUMBER 6 | DECEMBER 201336
resistance and endurance-trainingmodalities in specific training blocksshould be considered. Conditioningin the form of LIIT will be paired withhigher-volume resistance trainingwhereas strength and strength-powertraining is paired with HIIT. Here,the peripheral adaptations to hypertro-phy resistance training should pose lessinterference with LIIT than HIIT. LIITshould progress to more specific HIITafter the early stages of the mesocycle.
Peripheral adaptations stemming fromHIIT forms a fitting complement tothe predominantly neural adaptationsof strength and strength-power train-ing for the remainder of the cycle. Thedecreased volume load (VL) fromstrength and strength-power training,compared with hypertrophy training,makes way for additional volumes fromHIIT and technical and tactical activi-ties. Another important factor is the ten-dency for HIIT to increase type II fiberconcentration (26). This adaptation in-creases RFD (51,54), maximal force pro-duction capabilities (51), and maximalpower output (86), which match the
mechanisms underpinning adaptationsto strength-power training (21).
The following section provides anexample of the specific preparationperiod within a training plan. Detailedguidelines will be presented for weeks5, 6, 7, and 8 of a 13-week macrocycle,culminating in a high-level amateurbout. The integration of training fac-tors, the management and distributionof training load, and the design ofphysiologically specific energy systemtraining are presented. In summary,this 4-week mesocycle will combinestrength development with HIIT, inaddition to technical and tacticaltraining.
THE DISTRIBUTION OF TRAININGLOAD
This proposed block periodizationmodel prioritizes, vertically integrates,and horizontally sequences the train-ing factors of MMA. Such a strategyhas proven to be the superior designfor athletes participating in concurrenttraining (33,72). Each successive meso-cycle will have a greater overall
training stress to continue to promotetraining adaptations (73) (Figure 2). A3:1-loading paradigm will be used foreach mesocycle (73). Here, the trainingstress will increase over the first 3 weeks,whereas the final week provides aperiod of restitution before the increasedtraining load of the nextmesocycle. Thisstrategy allows super-compensation andthe performance gains from the meso-cycle to be realized (82).
In accordance with the principles ofperiodization, technical sessions increasein priority (73). This training is ath-lete specific, targeting technical flawsand fine-tuning other techniques.This is in contrast to tactical sessions,which involve strategies specific tothe upcoming opponent. As a moredeveloped technical ability andincreased conditioning dictates thestrategic options for an MMA fighter,tactical sessions remain a lower pri-ority until the final mesocycle. TheVL of resistance training decreasesas the athlete moves from the devel-opment of hypertrophy to strength.This makes way for the increased
Table 1The configuration of training tasks within a mesocycle and over a macrocycle
Macrocycle
Order ofpriority
Mesocycle 1:general
preparation
Mesocycle 2:specific
preparation
Mesocycle 3:Precompetition
Taper
1 Intervaltrainingusing 1:1Hi:Lo ratio
Technical Tactical 8–14 d induration.Reduce overalltraining stressby 40–60%
Bout
2 Hypertrophytraining
High-intensityenergy systemconditioningusing 1:2 Hi:Loratio
Technical
3 Technical Strength training High-intensityenergy systemconditioningusing 1:2 Hi:Loratio.
4 Tactical Tactical Strength-powertraining
Strength and Conditioning Journal | www.nsca-scj.com 37
volume of technical and energy sys-tem training. Relative distribution ofthe training workloads for this periodis presented in Figure 3 and Table 1.Table 2 depicts the weekly schedulefor these training tasks.
MONITORING
A large volume of concurrent training,as is common in an MMA training
plan, increases the risk of overtraining(20,31) necessitating careful athletemonitoring of fatigue state. To monitortraining load and its impact on fatigueeffectively, a number of strategies arerecommended. The loads should bepreplanned and based on the capacityof the individual. Self-reporting shouldassist in athlete monitoring by record-ing fatigue level, sleep quality, resting
morning heart rate, and rate of per-
ceived exertion using questionnairessuch as RESTQ-Sport, profile of mood
states, and total quality recovery. Train-
ing loads should be modified if thismonitoring data provide evidence of
increased fatigue.
Field tests should be conducted duringthe first week of each mesocycle to
Figure 2. A 3:1-loading paradigm used to manage the overall training stress over a macrocycle. The last week of the pre-competition mesocycle forms the first week of the 2-week taper (73).
Figure 3. Distribution of training workloads over the specific preparation mesocycle.
Periodization for Mixed Martial Arts
VOLUME 35 | NUMBER 6 | DECEMBER 201338
Table 2Weekly training schedule for the specific preparation period
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Week 5 Recovery day
Morning Technical Technical Technical Energy systemconditioning
Technical Technical
Lunch
Evening Energy systemconditioning
Strength training Strength training
Week 6
Morning Technical Technical Technical Technical Technical Technical
Lunch Energy systemconditioning
Evening Energy systemconditioning
Strength training Energy systemconditioning
Strength training
Week 7
Morning Technical Technical Technical Technical Technical Technical
Lunch Energy systemconditioning
Evening Energy systemconditioning
Strength training Energy systemconditioning
Energy systemconditioning
Strength training
Week 8
Morning Technical Technical Technical Energy systemconditioning
Technical Technical
Lunch
Evening Energy systemconditioning
Strength training Strength training
Stre
ngth
andConditio
ningJo
urnal|www.nsca-scj.c
om
39
determine the athlete’s preparednessand to monitor the impact of the pre-vious training cycle (Table 3). Theseperformance tests will assist in identify-ing any deficiencies in the athlete’sphysiological abilities. This informationshould also be presented to sports-specific coaches to help determine theprioritization of training tasks (thusallocation of workloads) over the meso-cycle and within each block. For exam-ple, a highly technical fighter may befound to lack HIITcapacity, thus, energysystem conditioning may be prioritizedover technical work in a training block.Alternatively, an athlete may have lowstrength, and the development of thiscapacity may increase in priority. Specialattention must be paid to the potentialinterference effects that can impact adap-tations. Thus, if an increase in strength orpower is desired, it would be beneficial tolower endurance-training workload.
RESISTANCE TRAINING
The development of strength in thismesocycle is in accordance with the the-ory of sequenced training. This methodsuggests that the development of oneability potentiates the development ofthe next (47,83). Thus, each trainingperiod should facilitate the improvement
of the following period. This is sug-gested to be the superior approachwhen developing a training plan(23,40,63,72,83,91). Targeting muscularhypertrophy in the previous mesocyclestimulates increases in cross-sectionalarea, anaerobic capacity, and fat-freemass, which provides the foundationfor the development of strength in thefollowing block (82). However, cautionshould be applied to prevent additionalhypertrophy from interfering with theathlete’s ability to reach the requiredweight for their class. The improvedstrength aids in the development ofpower in the following mesocycle(23). The resistance training frequency,volume, and loading should fall withinthe optimal bandwidth for high-levelconcurrently training athletes (34).Additionally, to provide necessary un-loading, the presented program incor-porates only 2 sets in the final week ofthis mesocycle. Heavy and light daysare included to provide reasonable var-iation in intensity, which optimizesrecovery and adaptation (32,81).
The principle of dynamic correspon-dence (19) would suggest that multijointexercises includingweightlifting activitiesare ideal. In accordance with the findingsof Izquierdo-Gabarren et al. (48),
repetitions are to be performed not tofailure. Table 4 presents the resistancetraining prescription and loadingschedule.
POWER TRAINING
The sequenced approach to this train-ing plan aims for maximal power gen-erating capacity to peak on completionof the final mesocycle, thus, the resis-tance training emphasis of this periodis directed toward the force portion ofthe force-velocity relationship. How-ever, the weightlifting activities andtheir variations that are included allowfor the development of both force andvelocity components (19). Velocity-specific improvements are trained inthis period through the inclusion ofplyometric-type, and low-load ballisticand weightlifting tasks during energysystem training and technical sessions.Such modalities are understood toimpact the velocity portion of theforce-velocity relationship (24). Thismixed-methods approach is recog-nized as the superior method for devel-oping power (69).
ENERGY SYSTEM TRAINING
As LIIT delivers improvements pre-dominately in aerobic capacity, itmay be suitable for inclusion in theearly stages of a training plan. How-ever, this should shift to HIIT strate-gies, which are bioenergeticallyspecific to an MMA bout. MMA’s re-ported high intensity to low intensity(Hi:Lo) ratio of 1:2 to 1:4 (28) shouldbe used to guide the design of energysystem training. In the example pre-sented (Table 5), a 1:2 Hi:Lo ratio isused and would allow a fighter to effec-tively prepare for an anticipated grap-pling-dominant fight. This is inaccordance with the indication thatgrappling sports have higher work-to-rest ratio than striking sports(18,59,64,70). A 1:4 Hi:Lo ratio couldbe used for bouts in which striking ex-changes are expected to predominate.Additionally, the work intervals con-sider the finding that approximately77% of fights were decided duringhigh-intensity sequences lasting 8–15seconds (28). Each set of work-to-
Table 3Physiological testing battery for MMA
Ability Test
Unloaded power output Countermovement jump
Loaded upper-body poweroutputa
Ballistic bench press throw at 55% of 1 repetitionmaximum (1RM)
Loaded lower-body poweroutputa
Jump squat at a load representing the weightclass of the athleteb
Upper-body dynamic strength 1RM bench press
Lower-body dynamic strength 1RM back squat
Intermittent aerobic andanaerobic capacity
Yo-Yo intermittent recovery level 2 test
1RM 5 repetition maximum.
aThese tests will be conducted if a linear position transducer is available.
bFor example, a fighter competing in the 77-kg weight class will use 77 kg for this test. Thisreflects the expression of power against an opponent during many standing grapplingexchanges.
Periodization for Mixed Martial Arts
VOLUME 35 | NUMBER 6 | DECEMBER 201340
recovery sequences lasts approxi-mately 5 minutes, which replicatesthe duration of a round.
In addition to greater specificity, the pro-gression to HIIT in this mesocycle min-imizes the disruption to the developmentof strength (51), power (86), and RFD(51,54) while simultaneously improvingboth low-intensity exercise enduranceand HIIT capacity (57,74,87). This formof interval training can shift the lactatethreshold and onset of blood lactate to
the right (29,42) eliciting improvements
in lactate buffering capacity, which iscritical considering the high lactate
levels experienced by MMA athletes
(7). Energy system conditioning strat-egies can use resistance training, cycli-
cal activities, or more sports-specific
modalities such as grappling and strik-ing drills (Table 5). In accordance withthe 3:1 loading pattern, training stressis increased over the first 3 weeks,whereas a considerable decrease is
prescribed in the final week (Table 6).Furthermore, no conditioning usingMMA-specific activities is prescribedin this final week to allow restitutionfrom the intense collisions associatedwith this mode.
TECHNICAL TRAINING
Because of the large number of disci-plines that compose MMA, technicalsessions likely comprise a greater por-tion of a training plan than many othersingle-event sports. Such sessions usu-ally include Brazilian jiu-jitsu, wres-tling, boxing, muay Thai boxing, ora combination of these. Technicaltraining may occur 6 days per week,and in many cases, more than onceper day. These sessions often consistof learning or fine-tuning specific tech-niques, followed by a period of livesparring in positions where the tech-nique can be applied. However, spar-ring sessions may also be deliveredindependently of other activities.
As technical sessions increase in prior-ity, the sports-specific coach will bedirected to increase the training work-load for this mesocycle, distributingthe training workload in accordancewith the 3:1-loading paradigm used.Methods for achieving this can be bythe inclusion or removal of sessions oradjusting the duration of the session.Furthermore, the intensity or durationof the live sparring component can be
Table 4Strength training prescription
Tuesday (heavy) Friday (medium)
Clean Hang power clean and press
Push press Back squat
Deadlift DB Press
Bench press Single-arm DB row
Barbell row Stiff-leg deadlift
Loading schedule
Week Sets Repetitions %1RM
5 2 5 T: 80%, F: 70%
6 3 5 T: 85%, F: 70%
7 4 5 T: 85%, F: 70%
8 2 5 T: 75%, F: 60%
DB, dumbbell; F, Friday; T, Tuesday.
Table 5Energy system training strategies based on a Hi:Lo ratio of 1:2
Mode Set length Work intervals Recovery No. Repetitions Sets Rest (min)
Sports-specific 5 min A takedown againsta resisting opponent,or 10-s strikingcombination
20-s low-intensitygrappling or sparring
10 Week 5:5Week 6:6Week 7:7Week 8:4
1
Resistance complex 5 min 15 s 15 s of either hangpower clean/clean/high pull/push press.Change each workinterval. At 40% 1RMhang power clean
30-s back squat. At 40%1RM hang powerclean
7
Rowing, cycling,running, orcombination
5 min 15 s 15 s at 110–120%maximal aerobicspeed
30 s at 70% maximalaerobic speed
7
Strength and Conditioning Journal | www.nsca-scj.com 41
altered to meet the requirements of theperiod (Table 7). Because of the lowprioritization of tactical sessions in thismesocycle, such tasks can be easilyintegrated into technical sessions with-out extending the training time exces-sively. Technical workouts should bescheduled early in the day to minimizethe potential for fatigue to interfere withthe skill acquisition required from thesesessions. The 24 hour period betweensessions, including sleep, will aid in theconsolidation of these complex motorskills (89).
INJURY PREVENTION
Many MMA techniques requiresuperior neuromuscular control ofthe athlete’s center of mass over theirbase of support, and of the lowerlimbs themselves. Deficiencies inthese areas, which lead to valgus col-lapse about an excessively extendedknee, are reported to increase the riskof noncontact anterior cruciate liga-ment injury (4,43). Improvements inneuromuscular control seem to
reduce the risk of such injuries (37).Injury prevention strategies thatfocus on precise lower limb align-ment during specific plyometric andballistic tasks are recommended.Such exercises may include depthdrop variations, progressing to single-leg-bound and stick actions. Thesemay be included in the dynamicwarm-up at a submaximal effort. Addi-tionally, such activities, performed withgreater degrees of effort, will forma fitting complement to strength-powerresistance sessions in the followingmesocycle. Close qualitative analysis ofthe ballistic and plyometric actions usedin energy system conditioning should beundertaken to ensure that precision ofmovement is maintained when ina fatigued state. Implicit learning strate-gies are to be applied throughout to aidin the motor learning process (58).Application of close qualitative analysisand feedback on movement quality intechnical and tactical sessions will pro-vide further opportunities to improveneuromuscular control.
TAPERING
Although this discussion focuses onthe specific preparation period, itis important that strength and con-ditioning coaches have a generalunderstanding of tapering. An effec-tive taper reduces overall trainingstress, allowing fatigue to dissipate,thereby maximizing preparedness.It has been shown that a correctlydesigned and implemented tapercan improve performance to varyingdegrees depending on the trainingtype and characteristics of the ath-lete. A meta-analysis of tapering dataon endurance performance showsthat the most effective strategy is toimplement an 8-day to 2-week taperthat reduces training volume by 41–60% (16). Furthermore, it seems asthough a reduction in training vol-ume while intensity and frequencyare maintained has the most positiveeffects on performance in highlytrained athletes (67). In this example,the taper begins 2 weeks beforethe bout with a 40% reduction intraining load followed by a further20% reduction of pretaper trainingload in the final week beforecompetition.
CONCLUSIONS
MMA is a complex sport requiring theconcurrent development of a broadscope of abilities. The development ofthese attributes requires training inter-ventions which illicit distinct and oftenconflicting adaptations. This increasesthe risk of mismanaged training work-loads and poorly integrated trainingtasks, which will certainly limit per-formance gains and may lead toovertraining or injury. However, byunderstanding the potential conflictsstemming from divergent trainingstimuli, an effective periodization strat-egy can be developed. This will directthe management of fatigue and recov-ery while pairing complementaryendurance and resistance trainingmodalities and sequencing targetedabilities. By using these strategies, thestrength and conditioning coach caneffectively assist in the short-term and
Table 6Energy system training frequency
Mode Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8
Sports-specific 1 1 2 0
Resistance complex 1 1 1 1
Cyclical activities 0 1 1 1
Total 2 3 4 2
Table 7Frequency, duration, structure, and intensity guidelines for technical
sessions
Week No. sessions Duration (min) Sparring/liveapplicationcomponent
(min)
Intensity ofsparring
component
5 5 90 30 M
6 6 90 30 H
7 6 90 45 H
8 5 60 20 L
L 5 low; M 5 medium; H 5 high.
Periodization for Mixed Martial Arts
VOLUME 35 | NUMBER 6 | DECEMBER 201342
long-term development of the MMAathlete.
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding:The authors report no conflicts of interestand no source of funding.
Lachlan P.
James is theowner andstrength andconditioningcoach at AthleticKinetics, Vancou-ver, Canada.
Vincent G.
Kelly is a ConjointAssociate Lec-turer in Sportand Science andExercise Physiol-ogy at the Schoolof HumanMovement Stud-ies, University of
Queensland, Australia.
Emma M.
Beckman isa lecturer inClinical ExercisePhysiology at theSchool of HumanMovement Stud-ies, University ofQueensland,Australia.
REFERENCES1. Aagaard P, Andersen J, Bennekou M,
Larsson B, Olesen JL, Crameri R,
Magnusson SP, and Kjær M.
Effects of resistance training on
endurance capacity and muscle fiber
composition in young top‐level cyclists.
Scand J Med Sci Sports 21: 298–307,
2011.
2. Aagaard P, Bennekou M, Larsson B,
Andersen JL, Olesen J, Crameri R,
Magnusson PS, and Kjaer M. Resistance
training leads to altered muscle fiber type
composition and enhanced long-term
cycling performance in elite competitive
cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39: 448–
449, 2007.
3. Aagaard PS, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL,
Magnusson P, and Dyhre-Poulsen P.
Increased rate of force development and
neural drive of human skeletal muscle
following resistance training. J Appl Physiol
(1985) 93: 1318–1326, 2002.
4. Alentorn-Geli E, Myer GD, Silvers HJ,
Samitier G, Romero D, Lazaro-Haro C, and
Cugat R. Prevention of non-contact anterior
cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players.
Part 1: Mechanisms of injury and underlying
risk factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol
Arthrosc 17: 705–729, 2009.
5. Amtmann J and Berry S. Strength and
conditioning for reality fighting. Strength
Cond J 25: 67–72, 2003.
6. Amtmann JA. Self-reported training
methods of mixed martial artists at
a regional reality fighting event. J Strength
Cond Res 18: 194–196, 2004.
7. Amtmann JA, Amtmann KA, and Spath WK.
Lactate and rate of perceived exertion
responses of athletes training for and
competing in a mixed martial arts event
J Strength Cond Res 22: 645–647, 2008.
8. Baker D. A series of studies on the training
of high-intensity muscle power in rugby
league football players. J Strength Cond
Res 15: 198–209, 2001.
9. Baker D. The effects of an in-season of
concurrent training on the maintenance of
maximal strength and power in professional
and college-aged rugby league football
players. J Strength Cond Res 15: 172–
177, 2001.
10. Baker D. Differences in strength and power
among junior-high, senior-high, college-
aged, and elite professional rugby league
players. J Strength Cond Res 16: 581–
585, 2002.
11. Baker DG and Newton RU. Adaptations in
upper-body maximal strength and power
output resulting from long-term resistance
training in experienced strength-power
athletes. J Strength Cond Res 20: 541–
546, 2006.
12. Baker DG and Newton RU. Comparison of
lower body strength, power, acceleration,
speed, agility, and sprint momentum to
describe and compare playing rank among
professional rugby league players.
J Strength Cond Res 22: 153–158, 2008.
13. Balabins C, Psarakis C, Moukas M,
Vassiliou M, and Behrakis P. Early phase
changes by concurrent endurance and
strength training. J Strength Cond Res 17:
393–401, 2003.
14. Bishop D, Jenkins D, Mackinnon L,
McEniery M, and Carey M. The effects of
strength training on endurance
performance and muscle characteristics.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 886–891,
1999.
15. Bompa T and Haff GG. Periodization:
Theory and Methodology of Training.
Windsor, Ontario: Human Kinetics, 2009.
287–309.
16. Bosquet L, Montpetit J, Arvisais D, and
Mujika I. Effects of tapering on
performance: A meta-analysis. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 39: 1358–1365, 2007.
17. Bounty PL, Campbell BI, Galvan E, CookeM,
and Antonio J. Strength and conditioning
considerations for mixed martial arts.
Strength Cond J 33: 56–67, 2011.
18. Cappai I, Concu A, Crisafulli A, Melis F,
Milia R, Tocco F, and Vitelli S. Physiological
responses and energy cost during
a simulation of a Muay Thai boxing match.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 34: 143–150,
2009.
19. Chiu LZF and Schilling BK. A primer on
weightlifting: From sport to sports training.
Strength Cond J 27: 42–48, 2005.
20. Chromiak JA and Mulvaney DR. A review:
The effects of combined strength and
endurance training on strength
development. J Appl Sport Sci Res 4:
55–60, 1990.
21. Cormie P, McCaulley GO, and
McBride JM. Power versus strength-power
jump squat training: Influence on the load
power relationship. Med Sci Sports Exerc
39: 996–1003, 2007.
22. Cormie P, McGuigan MR, and Newton RU.
Adaptations in athletic performance after
ballistic power versus strength training.Med
Sci Sports Exerc 42: 1582–1598, 2010.
23. Cormie P, McGuigan MR, and Newton RU.
Influence of strength on magnitude and
mechanisms of adaptation to power
training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42: 1566–
1581, 2010.
24. Cormie P, McGuigan MR, and Newton RU.
Developing maximal neuromuscular power:
Part 2-training considerations for improving
maximal power production. Sports Med 41:
125–146, 2011.
25. Craig BW, Lucas J, Pohlman R, and
Stelling H. The effects of running,
weightlifting and a combination of both on
growth hormone release. J Strength Cond
Res 5: 198–203, 1991.
26. Dawson B, Fitzsimons M, Green S,
Goodman C, Carey M, and Cole K.
Changes in performance, muscle
metabolites, enzymes and fibre types after
Strength and Conditioning Journal | www.nsca-scj.com 43
short sprint training. Eur J Appl Physiol
Occup Physiol 78: 163–169, 1998.
27. Degoutte F, Jouanel P, and Filaire E. Energy
demands during a judo match and
recovery. Br J Sports Med 37: 245–249,
2003.
28. Del Vecchio FB, Hirata SM, and
Franchini E. A review of time-motion
analysis and combat development in mixed
martial arts matches at regional level
tournaments. Percept Mot Skills 112:
639–648, 2011.
29. Denadai B, Ortiz M, Greco C, and de
Mello M. Interval training at 95% and 100%
of the velocity at VO2 max: Effects on
aerobic physiological indexes and running
performance. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 31:
737–743, 2006.
30. Dudley G and Djamil R. Incompatibility of
endurance-and strength-training modes of
exercise. J Appl Physiol 59: 1446–1451,
1985.
31. Dudley GA and Fleck SJ. Strength and
endurance training. Are they mutually
exclusive? Sports Med 4: 79–85, 1987.
32. Foster C. Monitoring training in athletes
with reference to overtraining syndrome.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 30: 1164–1168,
1998.
33. Garcıa-Pallares J, Garcıa-Fernandez M,
Sanchez-Medina L, and Izquierdo M.
Performance changes in world-class
kayakers following two different training
periodization models. Eur J Appl Physiol
110: 99–107, 2010.
34. Garcia-Pallares J and Izquierdo M.
Strategies to optimize concurrent training
of strength and aerobic fitness for rowing
and canoeing. Sports Med 41: 329–343,
2011.
35. Garcıa-Pallares J, Sanchez-Medina L,
Carrasco L, Dıaz A, and Izquierdo M.
Endurance and neuromuscular changes in
world-class level kayakers during
a periodized training cycle. Eur J Appl
Physiol 106: 629–638, 2009.
36. Gastin P. Energy system interaction and
relative contribution during maximal
exercise. Sports Med 31: 725–741, 2001.
37. Gilchrist J, Mandelbaum B, Melancon H,
Ryan G, Silvers H, Griffin L, Watanabe D,
Randall W, and Dvorak J. A randomized
controlled trial to prevent noncontact
anterior cruciate ligament injury in female
collegiate soccer players. Am J Sports
Med 36: 1476–1483, 2008.
38. Hakkinen K, Aien M, and Komi PV.
Changes in isometric force- and relaxation-
time, electromyographic and muscle fibre
characteristics of human skeletal muscle
during strength training and detraining.
Acta Physiol Scand 125: 573–585, 1985.
39. Hakkinen K, Alen M, Kraemer W,
Gorostiaga E, Izquierdo M, Rusko H,
Mikkola J, Hakkinen A, Valkeinen H, and
Kaarakainen E. Neuromuscular adaptations
during concurrent strength and endurance
training versus strength training. Eur J Appl
Physiol 89: 42–52, 2003.
40. Harris G, Stone M, O’Bryant H, Proulx C,
and Johnson R. Short-term performance
effects of high power, high force, or
combined weight-training methods.
J Strength Cond Res 14: 14–20, 2000.
41. Hennessy LC and Watson AW. The
interference effects of training for strength
and endurance simultaneously. J Strength
Cond Res 8: 12–19, 1994.
42. Henritze J, Weltman A, Schurrer RL, and
Barlow K. Effects of training at and above
the lactate threshold on the lactate threshold
and maximal oxygen uptake. Eur J Appl
Physiol Occup Physiol 54: 84–88, 1985.
43. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Heidt RS,
Colosimo AJ, McLean SG, van den
Bogert AJ, Paterno MV, and Succop P.
Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular
control and valgus loading of the knee
predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk
in female athletes: A prospective study. Am
J Sports Med 33: 492–501, 2005.
44. Hickson R, Dvorak B, Gorostiaga E,
Kurowski T, and Foster C. Potential for
strength and endurance training to amplify
endurance performance. J Appl Physiol
(1985) 65: 2285–2290, 1988.
45. Hickson RC. Interference of strength
development by simultaneously training for
strength and endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol
Occup Physiol 45: 255–263, 1980.
46. Holloszy JO and Booth FW. Biochemical
adaptations to endurance exercise in
muscle. Annu Rev Physiol 38: 273–291,
1976.
47. Issurin V. Block periodization versus
traditional training theory: A review.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness 48: 65–75,
2008.
48. Izquierdo-Gabarren M, Gonzalez DTER,
Garcıa-pallares J, Sanchez-medina L, De
Villarreal ES, and Izquierdo M. Concurrent
endurance and strength training not to
failure optimizes performance gains. Med
Sci Sports Exerc 42: 1191–1199, 2010.
49. Johnston RE, Quinn TJ, Kertzer R, and
Vroman NB. Strength training in female
distance runners: Impact on running
economy. J Strength Cond Res 11: 224–
229, 1997.
50. Kaneko M, Fuchimoto T, Toji H, and Suei K.
Training effect of different loads on the
force-velocity relationship and mechanical
power output in human muscle. Scand J
Sports Sci 5: 50–55, 1983.
51. Korhonen MT, Cristea A, Alen M,
Hakkinen K, Sipila S, Mero A, Viitasalo JT,
Larsson L, and Suominen H. Aging, muscle
fiber type, and contractile function in sprint-
trained athletes. J Appl Physiol (1985)
101: 906–917, 2006.
52. Kraemer WJ, Patton JF, Gordon SE,
Harman EA, Deschenes MR, Reynolds K,
Newton RU, Triplett NT, and Dziados JE.
Compatibility of high-intensity strength and
endurance training on hormonal and
skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol
(1985) 78: 976–989, 1995.
53. Kraemer WJ, Vescovi JD, and Dixon P. The
physiological basis of wrestling:
Implications for conditioning programs.
Strength Cond J 26: 10–15, 2004.
54. Kyrolainen H, Avela J, McBride J, Koskinen S,
Andersen J, Sipila S, Takala T, and Komi P.
Effects of power training on muscle structure
and neuromuscular performance. Scand J
Med Sci Sports 15: 58–64, 2004.
55. Lenetsky S, Harris N, and Brughelli M.
Assessment and contributors of punching
forces in combat sports athletes:
Implications for strength and conditioning.
Strength Cond J 35: 1–7, 2013.
56. Leveritt M, Abernethy P, Barry B, and
Logan P. Concurrent strength and
endurance training. Sports Med 28: 413–
427, 1999.
57. MacDougall JD, Hicks AL, MacDonald JR,
McKelvie RS, Green HJ, and Smith KM.
Muscle performance and enzymatic
adaptations to sprint interval training.
J Appl Physiol 84: 2138–2142, 1998.
58. Magill R. Motor Learning and Control-
Concept and Applications. New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2011.
320–329.
59. Matsushigue KA, Hartmann K, and
Franchini E. Taekwondo: Physiological
responses and match analysis. J Strength
Cond Res 23: 1112–1117, 2009.
60. Maughan R andGleesonM. TheBiochemical
Basis of Sports Performance. Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press, 2010. 178–192.
61. McDonagh MJ and Davies CT. Adaptive
response of mammalian skeletal muscle to
exercise with high loads. Eur J Appl Physiol
52: 139–155, 1984.
62. McGill SM, Chaimberg JD, Frost DM, and
Fenwick CMJ. Evidence of a double peak in
muscle activation to enhance strike speed
and force: An example with elite mixed
Periodization for Mixed Martial Arts
VOLUME 35 | NUMBER 6 | DECEMBER 201344
martial arts fighters. J Strength Cond Res
24: 348–357, 2010.
63. Medvedev A, Rodionov V, Rogozkin V,
and Gulyants A. Training content of
weightlifters during the preparation
period. Yessis, M., trans. Teoriya I
Praktika Fizicheskoi Kultury 12: 5–7,
1981.
64. Miarka B, Panissa VLG, Julio UF, Del
Vecchio FB, Calmet M, and Franchini E. A
comparison of time-motion performance
between age groups in judo matches.
J Sports Sci 30: 899–905, 2012.
65. Mikkola JS, Rusko HK, Nummela AT,
Paavolainen LM, and Hakkinen K.
Concurrent endurance and explosive type
strength training increases activation and
fast force production of leg extensor
muscles in endurance athletes. J Strength
Cond Res 21: 613–620, 2007.
66. Millet G, Jaouen B, Borrani F, and
Candau R. Effects of concurrent
endurance and strength training on running
economy and VO2 kinetics. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 34: 1351–1359, 2002.
67. Mujika I. Tapering and Peaking for Optimal
Performance. Champaign, IL: Human
Kinetics, 1999. 78–80.
68. Nader GA. Concurrent strength and
endurance training: From molecules to
man. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38: 1965–
1970, 2006.
69. Newton RU and Kraemer WJ. Developing
explosive muscular power: Implications for
a mixed methods training strategy.
Strength Cond J 16: 20–20, 1994.
70. Nilsson J, Csergo S, Gullstrand L, Tveit P,
and Refsnes PE. Work-time profile, blood
lactate concentration and rating of
perceived exertion in the 1998 Greco-
Roman wrestling World Championship.
J Sports Sci 20: 939–945, 2002.
71. Paavolainen L, Hakkinen K, Hamalainen I,
Nummela A, and Rusko H. Explosive-strength
training improves 5-km running time by
improving running economy and muscle
power. J Appl Physiol86: 1527–1533, 1999.
72. Painter K, Haff G, Ramsey M, McBride J,
Triplett T, Sands W, Lamont H, Stone M,
and Stone M. Strength gains: Block versus
daily undulating periodization weight training
among track and field athletes. Int J Sports
Physiol Perform 7: 161–169, 2012.
73. Plisk SS and Stone MH. Periodization
strategies. Strength Cond J 25: 19–37,
2003.
74. Rodas G, Ventura JL, Cadefau JA,
Cusso R, and Parra J. A short training
programme for the rapid improvement of
both aerobic and anaerobic metabolism.
Eur J Appl Physiol 82: 480–486, 2000.
75. Rønnestad BR, Hansen EA, and Raastad T.
Effect of heavy strength training on thigh
muscle cross-sectional area, performance
determinants, and performance in well-
trained cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol 108:
965–975, 2010.
76. Rønnestad BR, Hansen EA, and Raastad T.
High volume of endurance training impairs
adaptations to 12 weeks of strength training
in well-trained endurance athletes. Eur J
Appl Physiol 112: 1457–1466, 2012.
77. Saunders PU, Telford RD, Pyne DB,
Peltola EM, Cunningham RB, Gore CJ,
and Hawley JA. Short-term plyometric
training improves running economy in
highly trained middle and long distance
runners. J Strength Cond Res 20: 947–
954, 2006.
78. Schick MG, Brown LE, and Schick EE.
Strength and conditioning considerations
for female mixed martial artists. Strength
Cond J 34: 66–75, 2012.
79. Silva JJR, Del Vecchio FB, Picanco LM,
Takito MY, and Franchini E. Time-motion
analysis in Muay-Thai and Kick-Boxing
amateur matches. J Hum Sport Exerc 6:
490–496, 2011.
80. Spurrs RW, Murphy AJ, and Watsford ML.
The effect of plyometric training on
distance running performance. Eur J Appl
Physiol 89: 1–7, 2003.
81. Stone M, Stone M, and Sands W.
Principles and Practices of Resistance
Training. Windsor, Ontario: Human
Kinetics, 2007. 259–294.
82. Stone MH, O’Bryant H, Garhammer J,
McMillan J, and Rozenek R. A theoretical
model of strength training. Strength Cond J
4: 36–39, 1982.
83. Stone MH, Sanborn K, O’Bryant HS,
Hartman M, Stone ME, Proulx C, Ward B,
and Hruby J. Maximum strength-power-
performance relationships in collegiate
throwers. J Strength Cond Res 17: 739–
745, 2003.
84. Stone MH, Stone ME, Sands WA,
Pierce KC, Newton RU, Haff GG, and
Carlock J. Maximum strength and strength
training-a relationship to endurance?
Strength Cond J 28: 44–53, 2006.
85. Stowers T, McMillan J, Scala D, Davis V,
Wilson D, and Stone M. The short-term
effects of three different strength-power
training methods. Strength Cond J 5: 24–
27, 1983.
86. Suter E, Herzog W, Sokolosky J, Wiley JP,
and Macintosh BR. Muscle fiber type
distribution as estimated by Cybex testing
and by muscle biopsy. Med Sci Sports
Exerc 25: 363–370, 1993.
87. Tabata I, Irisawa K, Kouzaki M, Nishimura K,
Ogita F, and Miyachi M. Metabolic profile of
high intensity intermittent exercises. Med
Sci Sports Exerc 29: 390–395, 1997.
88. Tesch PA, Colliander EB, and Kaiser P.
Muscle metabolism during intense, heavy-
resistance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol
Occup Physiol 55: 362–366, 1986.
89. Walker MP, Brakefield T, Morgan A,
Hobson JA, and Stickgold R. Practice with
sleep makes perfect: Sleep-dependent motor
skill learning. Neuron 35: 205–211, 2002.
90. Wilson G, Murphy A, and Walshe A.
Performance benefits from weight and
plyometric training: Effects of initial
strength level. Coach Sport Sci J 2: 3–8,
1997.
91. Wilson GJ, Newton RU, Murphy AJ, and
Humphries BJ. The optimal training load for
the development of dynamic athletic
performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:
1279–1286, 1993.
Strength and Conditioning Journal | www.nsca-scj.com 45
Recommended