Part 3, Part 6, Part 9, Part 4, and Part 13 IOP...

Margaret GoodrichCIMug MeetingMay 18, 2012

Part 3, Part 6, Part 9, Part 4,and Part 13 IOP Report

Topics• Infrastructure for 2011 61968 IOP Tests

• CIM 61968-Part 3 IOP

– IOP Participants

– IOP Test Witnesses

– IOP Result Highlights

• CIM 61968-Part 6 IOP

– IOP Participants

– IOP Test Witnesses

– IOP Result Highlights

Topics

• Test Approach – 61968-Part 3 & Part 6– Part 3 Scenarios

– Part 6 Scenarios

• CIM 61968-Part 9 IOP– IOP Participants

– IOP Test Witnesses

– IOP Contents

– Test Scenarios

Topics• CIM61968-Part 4 and Part 13 IOP

– IOP Participants

– IOP Test Witnesses & Test Host

– IOP Contents

– IOP Result Highlights

• Test Approach – 61968-Part 4 & Part 13– Profile Data Groups

– Import/Export Exchange Tests

– Interoperation Tests

– Power Flow Tests

• IOP Report Contents & Status

• Future IOP Tests

Part 3, 6 & 9 Test Infrastructure

• All tests were remotely executed• The ESB vendors performed any transformation that was

necessary to transmit the messages from one Vendor toanother– From Generic WSDL to Strongly Typed WSDL– From Strongly Types WSDL to Java Messaging Services

• Connectivity tests between the ESB and the Product vendorswere conducted prior to the test as well as dry runs

• Used GoTo Meeting to allow the test witnesses to view thevendor screens, see the messages and watch the progress ofthe test.

Part 3 IOP Participants

• L+G AMI

• Oracle OMS

• Oracle ESB

• TIBCO ESB

• IBM ESB

• Alstom Grid DMS & SCADA

• EDF ESB

• EDF R&D SCADA

• GE OMS

• Telvent OMS

Part 3 IOP Test Witnesses

• David Bogen, ONCOR Electric Delivery (Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA)

• Frank Wilhoit, American Electric Power (AEP – Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA

• Jim Greene, American Electric Power (AEP – Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA

• Mark Ortiz, Consumers Energy (Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA)

• Hugo Bruers, Alcatel-Lucent (Belgium)

• Matthias Stifter, Austrian Institute of Technology (Austria)

Part 3 IOP Result Highlights• All planned scenarios were executed

• All Product and ESB Vendors Passed all executedscenarios

Part 3 Test Approach: Scenarios

Part 3 Test Approach: Scenarios

Part 6 IOP Participants

• Alstom Grid DMS

• EDF R&D Simulator

• Sunflower Systems AMS

• IBM Maximo

• EDF ESB

• TIBCO ESB

• IBM ESB

• Oracle ESB

Part 6 IOP Test Witnesses

• David Bogen, ONCOR Electric Delivery (Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA)

• Frank Wilhoit, American Electric Power (AEP – Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA

• Jim Greene, American Electric Power (AEP – Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA

• Mark Ortiz, Consumers Energy (Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA)

• Hugo Bruers, Alcatel-Lucent (Belgium)

• Matthias Stifter, Austrian Institute of Technology (Austria)

Part 6 IOP Result Highlights• All planned scenarios were executed

• All Product and ESB Vendors Passed all executedscenarios

Part 6 Test Approach: Scenarios

Part 6 Test Approach: Scenarios

Part 9 IOP Participants

• Oracle

• Elster

• Landis + Gyr

• OPC Foundation

• Ecologic

• EnergyICT

• eMeter

• AEP

• Alstom

• TIBCO ESB

• IBM ESB

• Oracle ESB

Part 9 IOP Test Witnesses

• David Bogen, ONCOR Electric Delivery

• Jerry Grey and John Simmins, EPRI

Part 9 IOP Contents

• Messages Tested Include:

– Meter Reading

– End Device Control

– End Device Event

Part 9 Test Scenarios

Part 9 Test Scenarios

Part 9 Test Scenarios

Part 9 Test Scenarios

Part 9 Test Scenarios

Part 9 Test Scenarios

Meter Readings Sync R/R (1/2)

<MDM>eMeter

<AMI>AEP

<ESB>WebSphere ESB

MDM sends an on-demand meter readings

request to AMI

Get(GetMeterReadings) Get(GetMeterReadings)

ESB sends the meter readings request to AMIwithout Changes.

<MDM>eMeter

<AMI>AEP

<ESB>WebSphere ESB

Get(GetMeterReadings)

ESB sends the ACK to MDM

without changes

AMI returns an ACK toMDM synchronously

Request

Sync ACK Response

Get(GetMeterReadings)

Part 9 Test Scenarios

Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Participants

• Alstom Grid

• EDF

• GE Energy

• Open DSS

• Open Grid Systems

• Oracle

• Siemens

• SISCO

• SupeLec

• TIBCO

Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Witnesses & TestHost

• Alfredo Espinosa Reza, IIE (Institute for CFE, Mexico)

• Romano Napolitano, ENEL (DSO, Italy)

• Hugo Bruers, Alcatel-Lucent (Belgium)

• Matthias Stifter, Austrian Institute of Technology (Austria)

• EDF R&D – Michel Barberis, Eric Lambert, Pascale Bredillet forHosting the IOP and providing wonderful refreshments andfood!

Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Contents• CIM XML Profile Exchange tests for the Individual Profiles

with a Profile Group including:– Full Model Exchange (import and export)– Power Flow Solutions– Interoperation of full test models between two or more

vendors• CIM XML Profile Exchange tests for the combined Profile

Group including:– Full Model Exchange (import and export)– Power Flow Solutions– Interoperation of full test models between two or more

vendors

Part 4 and Part 13 IOP Result Highlights

• All vendors imported at least one Profile Group file for one ormore of the official test files.

• Five of the vendors ran a Power Flow solution on theimported files

• Seven of the vendors exported at least one set of Profile DataGroup files for one or more of the official test files.

• All vendors executed one or more of the Interoperation TestProcedures

• There were also several unstructured tests generated andexecuted during this IOP.

Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Approach – ProfileData Groups

• For Power Flow:– Functional– Electrical Properties

• For GIS Import:– Functional– Asset

• For Power Flow Solution Exchange:– State Variables– Topology

Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Approach –Import/Export Exchange Tests

P artic ip an tA

XM LIm por t/Ex po rt

Te st Ca s e

5 .xB ro w ser

X M LT oo lsXS L

StyleS hee t

C IMX M L

Sc he m aX M L

Im p ort /E xp ort

P artic ip antB

Part 4 & Part 13 UCTE IOP Test Approach –Interoperation Tests

ParticipantA

ParticipantB

CIM XMLImport

TestCase-1

ModelMaint

System

CIM XMLImport

ModelMaint

System

CIM XMLExport

TestCase-2

CIM XMLValidator

Step 1

Steps 1,4Step 2

Step 2

Step 3

Step 4

Step 5

Steps1,4 Step 5

Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Approach – PowerFlow Tests

ParticipantA

ParticipantB

CIM XMLImport

TestCase-1

Power FlowApplication A

CIM XMLImport

Power FlowApplication B

Test Case-2(a previously imported/exported set ofCIM XML model files used in step 1)

CIM XMLValidator

Solution 1

(1)

(4,5)

(3)(2)

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

Solution 2

(2,5)

All IOP Reports: Contents

• All IOP Test Reports will contain:– List of Vendors, Test Witnesses, Products and Models that were part of the

test including a full list of the Official files as well as the files that weregenerated

– Detailed Test Results– Product Descriptions for all participants– List of all Issues that were identified and the disposition/resolution/proposed

solution if possible– Summary description of the Test Approach

• The Report will be published to all UCA members, all SGIP/SGTCCmembers and every major CIM mail exploder we have as well as to manyCustomer lists by the Vendors.

• This report will be posted on the UCA Web Sites (both CIM and 61850) assoon as it is published.

All IOP Reports: Status

• The Part 4 and Part 13 Test Report has been reviewed by the participantsand is in final revision. This will be published next week.

• The Part 3 IOP Test Report has been reviewed by the participants and is infinal revision. This will be published next week.

• The Part 6 IOP Test Report is in final draft version and will be released tothe Part 6 IOP team for review next week. It will be published the firstweek of June.

• The Part 9 IOP Test Report is in final draft version and will be released tothe Part 9 IOP team for review next week. It will be published the firstweek of June.

Future IOP Tests

• Part 13 has been transferred to WG13 and will be tested with the otherWG13 profiles as part of the ENTSO-e IOP tests.

• Future IOP tests to vet the 61968 Distribution standards, including Part 4,3, 6 and 9 may be tested by the WG14 teams independently. Decision willbe made at the next WG14 meeting at the end of this month.

• Future tests will include other messages that were not tested in theseIOPs.

• Certified IOP tests will be performed by Test Labs certified by the UCAITCA team.

Additional Information• UCA IOP Test Sponsors:

– Kay Clinard at UCA - kay@ucaiug.org– Randy Lowe at AEP – rrlowe@aep.com– John Simmins at EPRI – jsimmins@epri.com

• UCA IOP Test Director:– Margaret Goodrich email – margaret@sisconet.com– Margaret Goodrich Cell – + 1-903-477-7176

• UCA IOP Vendor Coordinators– 61968-4 – Bruce Scovill – bruce1.scovill@ge.com– 61968-13 – Eric Lambert – eric.lambert@edf.fr– 61968-6 – Nada Reinprecht – nadarein@au1.ibm.com– 61968-3 – Jon Fairchild – jon.fairchild@telvent.com– 61968-9 – Margaret Goodrich – margaret@sisconet.com

• IOP Host for 61850, 61968 Part 3, 4, 6, and 13:– Provided hosting, sponsorship and technical consulting– Eric Lambert – eric.lambert@edf.fr