PARCC Results-Year Three Grades 3-8 NJ ASK-Science Grades 4 & 8 · New Jersey’s Statewide...

Preview:

Citation preview

PARCC Results-Year Three Grades 3-8

NJ ASK-Science Grades 4 & 8

Woodland Park School DistrictSeptember 18, 2017Carmela Triglia

PARRC Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers - 2017

Grades 3-8 English Language Arts/ Literacy, Mathematics, & Algebra

New Jersey’s Statewide Assessment Program

▪ 2017 marks the 3rd administration of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC).

▪ Students took PARCC English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11.

▪ Students took PARCC Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 – 8.

▪ Students enrolled in Algebra I took the Algebra I End of Course Assessment.

PARCC Performance Levels

Level 1- Did not yet meet grade-level expectations

Level 2- Partially met grade-level expectations

Level 3-Approached grade-level expectations

Level 4-Met grade-level expectations

Level 5-Exceeded grade-level expectations

Comparison of WOODLAND PARK’S Spring 2015, Spring 2016 and 2017 PARCC AdministrationsEnglish Language Arts/Literacy Grades 3-4

2516.7 17.3

914.9 14

2028.1

10 2219 21.5

23 20.2

23.6

38 27.3 28.1

30 31.6

46.4

2934.7 32.2

2 3.5 2.7 2 4.1 4.1

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 3 2015 Grade 3 2016 Grade 3 2017 Grade 4 2015 Grade 4 2016 Grade 4 2017

Language Arts - Grades 3-4

Did Not Yet Meet Partially Met Approached Expectations Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations

32% 35.1% 49.1% 31%38.8% 36.3%

Comparison of WOODLAND PARK’S Spring 2015, Spring 2016 and Spring 2017 PARCC AdministrationsEnglish Language Arts/Literacy Grades 5-6

4 8.3 9.2 114.5 5.8

22 17.7 14.221

17.9 18.4

4234.4

31.7

35

27.7 21.4

3236.5

40

28

44.644.7

1 3.1 5 5 5.4 9.7

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 5 2015 Grade 5 2016 Grade 5 2017 Grade 6 2015 Grade 6 2016 Grade 6 2017

Language Arts- Grades 5-6

Did Not Yet Meet Partially Met Approached Expectations Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations

33% 39.6% 45% 33% 50% 54.4%

Comparison of WOODLAND PARK’S Spring 2015, Spring 2016 and Spring 2017 PARCC AdministrationsEnglish Language Arts/Literacy Grades 7-8

11 115.1

1911.7

4.6

22 17.2

15.3

22

17.5

17.9

20 26.9

27.1

25

16.5 29.8

44 35.2

35.6

30

43.737.7

39.7

16.95

10.7 9.9

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 7 2015 Grade 7 2016 Grade 7 2017 Grade 8 2015 Grade 8 2016 Grade 8 2017

Language Arts - Grades 7-8

Did Not Yet Meet Partially Met Approached Expectations Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations

47% 44.9% 52.5% 35% 54.4% 47.6%

COMPARISON of WOODLAND PARK’S 2015 to 2017 Spring PARCC AdministrationsENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Change in Level 1 and Level 2 Change in Level 4 and Level 5

Woodland Park District State Woodland Park District State

2015 2016 2017Changes in levels 1 &

2 from 2015 to 20172015 2016 2017

Changes in levels 4 &

5 from 2015 to 2017

Grade 3 45% 44.8% 27.3% 17.7% 5.8% 32% 35.1% 47.1% 15.1% 6.9%

Grade 4 31% 33.9% 35.5% 4.5% 1.8% 31% 38.8% 36.3% 5.3% 4.8%

Grade 5 26% 26% 23.4% 2.6% 3.3% 33% 39.6% 45% 12% 7.4%

Grade 6 32% 22.4% 24.2% 7.8% 2.3% 33% 50% 54.4% 21.4% 4.5%

Grade 7 33% 28.2% 20.4% 12.6% 5.0% 47% 44.9% 52.5% 5.5% 7.6%

Grade 8 41% 29.2% 22.5% 18.5% 5.5% 35% 54.4% 47.6% 12.6% 2.6%

Woodland Park 2017 Comparison to State (ELA)

Did Not Yet Met

Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Met

Expectations

(Level 2)

Approached

Expectations

(Level 3)

Met Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeded

Expectations

(Level 5)

District State District State District State District State District State

2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017

Grade 3 17.3 12.7 10.0 14.4 23.6 22.5 46.4 42.9 2.7 7.5

Grade 4 14 7.7 21.5 12.8 28.1 23.7 32.2 40.5 4.1 15.3

Grade 5 9.2 6.8 14.2 12.2 31.7 22.1 40 48.2 5.0 10.7

Grade 6 5.8 6.5 18.4 14.6 21.4 25.6 44.7 41.0 9.7 12.3

Grade 7 5.1 8.9 15.3 11.4 27.1 20.5 35.6 35.4 16.9 23.8

Grade 8 4.6 9.0 17.9 11.6 29.8 20.3 37.7 40.5 9.9 18.6

Comparison of Woodland Park’s Spring 2015 Spring 2016 and Spring 2017 PARCC AdministrationsMATHEMATICS – Grades 3-4

7 6 9 6 9 13.9

28 2511.7

35 27.924.6

30

19.8

22.5

3130.3

39.3

31

42.2

44.1

2628.7

21.3

5 6.912.6

1 4.1 0.8

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 3 2015 Grade 3 2016 Grade 3 2017 Grade 4 2015 Grade 4 2016 Grade 4 2017

Mathematics- Grades 3-4

Did Not Yet Meet Partially Met Approached Expectations Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations

36% 49.1% 56.7% 27% 32.8% 22.1%

Comparison of Woodland Park’s Spring 2015, Spring 2016 and Spring 2017 PARCC AdministrationsMATHEMATICS – Grades 5-6

39.2 6.7 6 5.3

14.4

27

28.6 30.8 3224.6

22.1

3832.7 30.8 32

30.726

30 26.5 27.5 2635.1 32.7

3 3.1 4.2 4 4.4 4.8

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 5 2015 Grade 5 2016 Grade 5 2017 Grade 6 2015 Grade 6 2016 Grade 6 2017

Mathematics - Grades 5-6

Did Not Yet Meet Partially Met Approached Expectations Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations

33% 29.6% 31.7% 30% 39.5% 37.5%

Comparison of Woodland Park’s Spring 2015, Spring 2016 and Spring 2017 PARCC AdministrationsMATHEMATICS – Grades 7-8

9 5.5 4.2

3022.8 21

2222.1 20

2834.2

25

3333.8 40

28 25.3

24.2

3431 30

15 16.529.8

27.6 5.8

0 1.3 0

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 7 2015 Grade 7 2016 Grade 7 2017 Grade 8 2015 Grade 8 2016 Grade 8 2017

Mathematics- Grades 7-8

Did Not Yet Meet Partially Met Approached Expectations Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations

36% 38.6% 35.8% 15% 17.8%29.8%

Comparison of Woodland Park’s Spring 2015, Spring 2016 and Spring 2017 PARCC AdministrationsAlgebra I

0 0 09

0 0

17

7.70

74

88.5

89.7

0 3.810.3

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Algerbra I 2015 Algebra I 2016 Algebra I 2017

Algebra I

Did Not Yet Meet Partially Met Approached Expectations Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations

74%

92.3%100%

COMPARISON of WOODLAND PARK’S 2015 to 2017 Spring PARCC AdministrationsMATHEMATICS

Changes in Level 1 and Level 2 Changes in Level 4 and Level 5

Woodland Park District State Woodland Park State

2015 2016 2017Changes in levels 1 &

2 from 2015 to 20172015 2016 2017

Changes in levels 4 &

5 from 2015 to 2017

Grade 3 35% 31% 23% 12% 4.4% 36% 49.1% 56.8% 20.8% 7.5%

Grade 4 41% 36.9% 38.5% 2.5% 3.5% 27% 32.8% 22.1% 4.9% 6.7%

Grade 5 30% 37.8% 37.5% 7.5% 2.5% 33% 29.6 % 31.7 1.3% 5.2%

Grade 6 38% 29.9% 36.5 1.5% 0.2% 30% 39.5% 37.5% 7.5% 2.8%

Grade 7 31% 27.6% 24.2 8.3% 2.1% 36% 38.6% 35.8 0.2% 2.8%

Grade 8 58% 57% 46% 12% 3.8% 15% 17.8% 29.8% 14.8 % 4.2%

Algebra I 9% 0% 0% 9% 4.8% 74% 92.3% 100% 26% 5.4%

Woodland Park 2017 Comparison to State (Mathematics)

Did Not Yet Met

Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Met

Expectations

(Level 2)

Approached

Expectations

(Level 3)

Met Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeded

Expectations

(Level 5)

District State District State District State District State District State

2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017

Grade 3 9.0 7.8 11.7 14.6 22.5 25.1 44.1 38.7 12.6 13.7

Grade 4 13.9 8.1 24.6 17.5 39.9 27.1 21.3 40.6 0.8 6.7

Grade 5 6.7 6.5 30.8 17.8 30.8 29.6 27.5 37.3 4.2 8.9

Grade 6 14.4 9.7 22.1 19.1 26.0 27.7 32.7 35.0 4.8 8.6

Grade 7 4.2 8.0 20.0 19.9 40.0 32.4 30.0 33.9 5.8 5.7

Grade 8 21.0 22.9 25.0 21.4 24.2 28.0 29.8 26.9 0.0 0.8

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

BEATRICE GILMORE GRADES 3-4ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Count of

Valid Test

Scores

Did Not Yet

Meet

Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially

Met Expectations'

(Level 2)

Approached

Expectations

(Level 3)

Met

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeded

Expectations

(Level 5)

District %

>= Level 4

Grade Level Students With Disabilities

Grade 3

Total Valid

110

Yes- IEP 21 (13) 61.9% (4) 19.0% (4) 19.0% (0)0.0% 0.0% (0)0.0%

No-IEP 89 (6) 6.7% (7) 7.9% (22) 24.7% (51) 57.3% (3) 3.4% (54) 60.7%

504 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%%

Grade 4

Total Valid

121

Yes- IEP 17 (9) 52.9% (5) 29.4% (2) 11.8% (1) 5.9% 0.0% (1) 5.9%

No-IEP 104 (8) 7.7% (21) 20.2% (32) 30.8% (38) 36.5% (5) 4.8% (43) 41.3%

504 7 (2) 28.6% (2) 28.6% 0% (3) 42.9% 0.0% (3) 42.9%

Grade 3

Total Valid

110

Economically Disadvantage

No 53 (4) 7.5% (6) 11.3% (11) 20.8% (29) 54.7% (3) 5.7% (32) 60.4%

Yes 57 (15)26.3% (5)8.8% (15) 26.3% (22) 38.6% 0.0% (22) 38.6%

Grade 4

Total Valid

121

No 55 (8) 14.5% (8) 14.5% (14) 25.5% (22) 40% (3) 5.5% (25) 45.5%

Yes 66 (9) 13.6% (18) 27.3% (20) 30.3% (17) 25.8% (2) 3% (19) 28.8%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

BEATRICE GILMORE GRADE 3ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Count of Valid Test Scores

Did Not Yet Meet Expectations

Partially MetExpectations

ApproachedExpectations

MetExpectations

ExceededExpectations

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 3 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 36 (11) 30.6% (5) 13.9% (5) 13.9% (14) 38.9% (1) 2.8% (15) 41.7%

American Indian 0 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0%

Asian 6 0.0% 0.0% (1) 16.7% (4) 66.7% (1) 16.7% (5) 83.3%

Black or African Am 10 (3) 30% 0.0% (3) 30.0% (4) 40.0% 0.0% (4) 40.0%

Pacific Islander 0 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0%

White 58 (5) 8.6% (6) 10.3% (17) 293% (29) 50% (1) 1.7% (30) 51.7%

Two or More Races 0 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0%

Grade Level 3 Gender

Female 55 (7) 12.7% (6) 10.9% (12) 21.8% (27) 49.1% (3) 5.5% (30) 54.5%

Male 55 (12) 21.8% (5) 9.1% (14) 25.5% (24) 43.6% (0) 0.0% (24) 43.6

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

BEATRICE GILMORE GRADE 4 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Count of Valid Test Scores

Did Not Yet Meet Expectations

Partially MetExpectations

ApproachedExpectations

MetExpectations

ExceededExpectations

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 4 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 50 (6) 12% (12) 24% (14) 28% (17) 34% (1) 2.0% (18) 36%

American Indian 0 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %

Asian 6 0.0% 0.0% (2) 33.3% (4) 66.7% 0.0% (4) 66.6%

Black or African Am 3 (2) 66.7 (1) 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Pacific Islander 0 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %

White 61 (9) 14.8% (13) 21.3% (17) 27.9% (18) 29.5% (4) 6.6% (22) 36.1

Two or More Races 1 0.0 % 0.0 % (1) 100.0% 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %

Grade Level 4 Gender

Female 52 (5) 9.6% (8) 15.4% (13) 25.0% (21) 40.4% (5) 9.6% (26) 50%

Male 69 (12) 17.4% (18) 26.1% (21) 30.4% (18) 26.1% 0.0% (18) 26.1%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

BEATRICE GILMORE GRADES 3-4MATHEMATICS

Count of Valid

Test Scores

Did Not Yet

Meet

Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially

Met

Expectations

(Level 2)

Approached

Expectations

(Level 3)

Met

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeded

Expectations

(Level 5)

District %

>= Level 4

Grade Level Students With Disabilities

Grade 3

Total Valid

111

Yes- IEP 21 (8) 38.1% (5) 23.8% (4) 19.0% (4) 19% (0) 0.0% (4) 19%

No-IEP 90 (2) 2.2% (8) 8.9% (21) 23.3% (45) 50% (14) 15.6 (59) 65.6%

504 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Grade 4

Total Valid

122

Yes- IEP 17 (9) 52.9% (7) 41.2% 0.0% (1) 5.9% 0.0% (1) 5.9%

No-IEP 105 (8) 7.6% (23) 21.9% (48) 45.7% (25) 23.8% (1) 1% (26) 24.8%

504 7 (2) 28.6% (2) 28.6% (2) 28.6% (1) 14.3% 0.0% (1) 14.3%

Grade 3

Total Valid

111

Economically Disadvantage

No 53 (4) 7.5% (2) 3.8% (11) 20.8% (28) 52.8% (8) 15.1% (36) 67.9%

Yes 58 (6) 10.3% (11) 19.0% (14) 24.1% (21) 36.2% (6) 10.3% (27) 46.6%

Grade 4

Total Valid

122

No 56 (6) 10.7% (10) 17.9% (24) 42.9% (15) 26.8 (1) 1.8% (16) 28.6%

Yes 66 (11) 16.7% (20) 30.3% (24) 36.4% (11) 16.7% 0.0% 11 (16.7)

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

BEATRICE GILMORE GRADE 3MATHEMATICS

Count of Valid Test Scores

Did Not Yet MeetExpectations

Partially MetExpectations

ApproachedExpectations

MetExpectations

ExceededExpectations

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 3 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 36 (4) 11.1% (4) 11.1% (9) 25% (17) 47.2% (2) 5.6% (19) 52.8%

American Indian 0 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0%

Asian 6 0.0% 0.0% (1) 16.7% (2) 33.3% (3) 50% (5) 83%

Black or African Am 10 (2) 20% (2) 20% (2) 20% (2) 20% (2) 20% (4) 40%

Pacific Islander 0 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0%

White 59 (4) 6.8% (7) 11.9% (13) 22% (28) 47.5% (7) 11.9% (35) 59.3%

Two or More Races 0 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0%

Grade Level 3 Gender

Female 55 (3) 5.5% (7) 12.7% (12) 21.8% (27) 49.1% (6) 10.9% (33) 60%

Male 56 (7) 12.5% (6) 10.7% (13) 23.2% (22) 39.3% (8) 14.3% (30) 53.6%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

BEATRICE GILMORE GRADE 4MATHEMATICS

Count of Valid Test Scores

Did Not Yet Meet

Partially Met ApproachedExpectations

Met Expectations

Exceeded Expectations

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 4 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 51 (9) 17.6% (14) 27.5% (19) 37.3% (9) 17.6% 0.0% (9) 16.6%

American Indian 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Asian 6 0.0% (1) 16.7% (2) 33.3% (3) 50% 0.0% (3) 50%

Black or African Am 3 (1) 33.3% (2) 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Pacific Islander 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

White 61 (7) 11.5% (13) 21.3% (26) 42.6% (14) 23.0% (1) 1.6% (15) 24.6%

Two or More Races 1 0.0% 0.0% (1) 100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Grade Level 4 Gender

Female 52 (5) 9.6% (10) 19.2% (22) 42.3% (15) 28.8% 0.0% (15) 28.8%

Male 70 (12) 17.1% (20)28.6% (26) 37.1% (11) 15.7% (1)1.4% (12) 17.1%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

MEMORIAL GRADES 5-6 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Count of Valid

Test Scores

Did Not Yet

Meet

(Level 1)

Partially Met

(Level 2)

Approached

Expectations

(Level 3)

Met

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeded

Expectations

(Level 5)

District

% >=

Level 4

Grade Level Students With Disabilities

Grade 5

Total Valid

120

Yes- IEP 19 (4) 21.1% (9) 47.4% (4) 21.1% (2) 10.5% 0.0% (2) 10.5%

No-IEP 101 (7) 6.9% (8) 7.9% (34) 33.7% (46) 45.5% (6) 5.9% (52) 51.5%

504 6 (1) 16.7% (2) 33.3% (1) 16.7% (2) 33.3% 0.0 (2) 33.3%

Grade 6

Total Valid

103

Yes- IEP 13 (3) 23.1% (4) 30.8% (3) 23.1% (3) 23.1% 0.0 (3) 23.1%

No-IEP 90 (3) 3.3% (15) 16.7% (19) 21.1% (43) 47.8% (10) 11.1% (53) 58.9%

504 2 0.0% (1) 50% 0.0% (1) 50% 0.0 (1) 50%

Grade 5

Total Valid

120

Economically Disadvantage

No 61 (4) 6.6% (5) 8.2% (16) 26.2% (32) 52.5% (4) 6.6% (36) 59.0%

Yes 59 (7) 11.9% (12) 20.3% (22) 37.3% (16) 27.1% (2) 3.4% (18) 30.5%

Grade 6

Total Valid

103

No 65 (1) 1.5% (11) 16.9% (15) 23.1% (28) 43.1% (10) 15.4% (38) 58.5%

Yes 38 (5) 13.2% (8) 21.1% (7) 18.4% (18) 47.4% 0.0% (18) 47.4%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

MEMORIAL GRADE 5ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS /LITERACY

Count of Valid Test Scores

Did Not Yet Meet

Partially Met Approached Expectations

Met Expectations

Exceeded Expectations

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 5 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 50 (5) 10% (7) 14% (19) 38% (18) 36% (1) 2% (19) 38%

American Indian 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Asian 5 0.0% (2) 40% 0.0% (3) 60% 0.0% (3) 60%

Black or African Am 5 (1) 20% (1) 20% (1) 20% (2) 40% 0.0% (2 )40%

Pacific Islander 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

White 57 (4) 7% (7) 12.3% (17) 29.8% (25) 43.9% (4) 7% (29) 50.9%

Two or More Races 3 (1) 33.3% 0.0% (1) 33.3% 0.0% (1) 33.3%% (1) 33.3%

Grade Level 5 Gender

Female 57 (3) 5.3% (9) 15.8% (19) 33.3% (23) 40.4% (3) 5.3% (26) 45.6%

Male 63 (8) 12.7% (8) 12.7% (19) 30.2% (25) 39.7% (3) 4.8% (28) 44.4%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

MEMORIAL GRADE 6ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS /LITERACY

Count of Valid Test Scores

Did Not Yet Meet

Partially Met ApproachedExpectations

Met Expectations

Exceeded Expectations

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 6 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 45 (3) 6.7% (11) 24.4% (9) 20% (18) 40% (4) 8.9% (22) 48.9%

American Indian 1 0.0% 0.0% (1) 100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Asian 3 0.0% 0.0% (1) 33.3% (2) 67.7% 0.0% (2) 67.7%

Black or African Am 3 (1) 33.3% 0.0% (2) 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Pacific Islander 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

White 50 (2) 4% (7) 14% (9) 18% (26) 52% (6) 12% (32) 64%

Two or More Races 1 0.0% (1) 100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Grade Level 6 Gender

Male 44 (1) 2.3% (4) 9.1% (9) 20.5% (23) 52.3% (7) 15.9% (30) 68.2%

Female 59 (5) 8.5% (15) 25.4% (13) 22.0% (23) 39.0% (3) 5.1% (26) 44.1%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

MEMORIAL GRADES 7-8 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/ LITERACY

Count of Valid

Test Scores

Did Not Yet

Meet (Level 1)

Partially Met

(Level 2)

Approached

Expectations

(Level 3)

Met Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeded

Expectations

(Level 5)

District %

>= Level 4

Grade Level Students With Disabilities

Grade 7

Total Valid

118

Yes- IEP 18 (2) 11.1% (9) 50% (3) 16.7% (4) 22.2% 0.0% (4) 22.2%

No-IEP 100 (4) 4% (9)9% (29) 29% (38) 38% (20) 20% (58) 58%

504 4 0.0% 0.0% (2) 50% (2) 50% 0.0 (2) 50%

Grade 8

Total Valid

151

Yes- IEP 31 (4) 12.9% (16) 51.6% (9) 29% (2) 6.5% 0.0% (2) 6.5%

No-IEP 120 (3) 2.5% (11) 9.2% (36) 30% (55) 45.8% (15) 12.5% (70) 58.3%

504 4 0.0% 0.0% (3) 75% (1) 25% 0.0% (1) 25%

Grade 7

Total Valid

118

Economically Disadvantage

No 59 (3) 5.1% (7) 11.9% (15) 25.4% (24) 40.7% (10) 16.9% (34) 57.6%

Yes 59 (3) 5.1% (11) 18.6% (17 )28.8% (18) 30.5% (10) 16.9% (28) 47.5%

Grade 8

Total Valid

151

No 81 (3) 3.7% (7) 8.6% (23) 28.4% (34) 42% (14) 17.3% (48) 59.3%

Yes 70 (4)5.7% (20) 28.6% (22) 31.4% (23) 32.9% (1) 1.4% (24) 34.3%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

Memorial Grade 7ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Count of Valid Test Scores

Did Not Yet Meet

Partially Met Approached Expectations

MetExpectations

Exceeded Expectations

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 7 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 49 (4) 8.2% (7) 14.3% (12) 24.5% (18) 36.7% (8) 16.3% (26) 53.1%

American Indian 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1) 100% (1) 100%

Asian 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (3) 50% (3) 50% (6) 100%

Black or African Am 3 0.0% 0.0% (1) 33.3% (1) 33.3% (1) 33.3% (2) 66.7%

Pacific Islander 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1) 100% 0.0% (1) 100%

White 57 (2) 3.5% (11) 19.3% (19) 33.3% (18) 31.6% (7) 12.3% (25) 43.9%

Two or More Races 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1) 100% 0.0% (1) 100&

Grade Level 7 Gender

Female 61 (1) 1.6% (6) 9.8% (16) 26.2% (24) 39.3% (14) 23% (38) 62.3%

Male 57 (5) 8.8% (12) 21.1% (16) 28.1% (18) 31.6% (6) 10.5% (24) 42.1%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

Memorial Grade 8ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Count of Valid Test Scores

Did Not Yet Meet

Partially Met Approached Expectations

Met Expectations

ExceededExpectations

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 8 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 57 (5) 8.8% (13) 22.8% (20) 35.1% (16) 28.1 (3) 5.3% (19) 33.3%

American Indian 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1) 100% 0.0% (1) 100%

Asian 2 (1) 50% 0.0% 0.0% (1) 50% 0.0% (1) 50%

Black or African Am 8 0.0% 0.0% (3) 37.5% (5) 62.5% 0.0% (5) 62/5%

Pacific Islander 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1) 100% (1) 100%

White 80 0.0% (14) 17.5% (22) 27.5% (33) 41.3% (11) 13.8% ((44) 55%

Two or More Races 2 (1) 50% 0.0% 0.0% (1) 50% 0.0% (1) 50%

Grade Level 8 Gender

Female 68 0.0% (9) 13.2% (20) 29.4% (26) 38.2% (13) 19.1% (39) 57.4%

Male 83 (7) 8.4% (18) 21.7% (25) 30.1% (31) 37.3% (2) 2.4% (33) 39.8%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

MEMORIAL GRADES 5-6 Mathematics

Count of Valid

Test Scores

Did Not Yet

Meet

(Level 1)

Partially

Met

(Level 2)

Approached

Expectations

(Level 3)

Met

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeded

Expectations

(Level 5)

District %

>= Level 4

Grade Level Students With Disabilities

Grade 5

Total Valid

126

Yes- IEP 19 (3)15.8% (11)57.9% (3)15.8% (2)10.5% 0% (2)10.5%

No-IEP 101 (5)5% (26)25.7% (34)33.7% (31)30.7% (5)5%(36)35.6(

1)5

504 6 (1)16.7% (2)33.3% (2)33.3% (1)16.7% 0% 16.7%

Grade 6

Total Valid

114

Yes- IEP 13 30.8% 61.5% 0% 7.7% 0% 7.7%

No-IEP 91 12.1% 16.5% 29.7% 36.3% 5.5% 41.8%

504 2 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50%

Grade 5

Total Valid

120

Economically Disadvantage

No 61 (2)3.3% (15)24.6% (17)27.9% (22)36.1% (5)8.2% (27)44.3%

Yes 59 (6)10.2% (22)37.3% (20)33.9% (11)18.6% 0% (11)18.6%

Grade 6

Total Valid

114

No 65 (5)7.7% (12)18.5% (16)24.6% (27)41.5% (5)7.7% (32)49.2%

Yes 39 (10)25.6% (11)28.2% (11)28.2% (7)17.9% 0% (7)17.9%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

Memorial Grade 5MATHEMATICS

Count of Valid Test Scores

Not Yet Meeting

Partially Meeting

Approaching Expectations

Meeting Expectations

Exceeding Expectation

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 5 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 50 (2)4.0% (21)42.0% (19)38.0% (8)16.0% 0.0% (8)16.0%

American Indian 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Asian 5 0.0% (2)40.0% (1)20.0% (2)40.0% 0.0% (2)40.0%

Black or African Am 5 0.0% (2)40.0% (1)20.0% (2)40.0% 0.0% (2)40.0%

Pacific Islander 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

White 57 (6)10.5% (10)17.5% (16)28.1% (21)36.8% (4)7.0% (25)43.9%

Two or More Races 3 0.0% (2)66.7% 0.0% 0.0% (1)33.3% (1)33.3%

Grade Level 5 Gender

Female 57 (5)8.8% (12)21.1% (21)36.8% (17)29.8% (2)3.5% (19)33.3%

Male 63 (3)4.8% (25)39.7% (16)25.4% (16)25.4% (3)4.8% (19)30.2%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

Memorial Grade 6MATHEMATICS

Count of Valid Test Scores

Did Not Yet Meet

Partially Met Approached Expectations

Met Expectations

ExceededExpectations

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 6 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 45 (8)17.8% (10)22.2% (12)26.7% (14)31.1% (1)2.2% (15)33.3%

American Indian 1 0.0% 0.0% (1)100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Asian 3 (1)33.3% 0.0% (1)33.3% 0.0% (1)33.3% (1)33.3%

Black or African Am 3 0.0% (1)33.3% (2)66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Pacific Islander 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

White 51 (5)9.8% (12)23.5% (11)21.6% (20)39.2% (3)5.9% (23)45.1%

Two or More Races 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Grade Level 6 Gender

Female 44(6)13.6%

(7)15.9% (13)29.5% (15)34.1% (3)6.8% (18)40.9%

Male 60 (9)15.9% (16)26.7% (14)23.3% (19)31.7% (2)3.3% (21)35.0%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

MEMORIAL GRADES 7-8 MATHEMATICS

Count of

Valid Test

Scores

Did Not Yet

Meet

(Level 1)

Partially

Met

(Level 2)

Approached

Expectations

(Level 3)

Met

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeded

Expectations

(Level 5)

District

% >=

Level 4

Grade Level Students With Disabilities

Grade 7

Total Valid

124

Yes- IEP 18 (3)16.7% (9)50.0% (5)27.8% (1)5.6% 0% (1)5.6%

No-IEP 102 (2)2.0% (15)14.7% (43)42.2% (35)34.3% (7)6.9% (42)41.2%

504 4 (1)25.0% (1)25.0% (1)25.0% (1)25.0% 0.0% (1)25.5%

Grade 8

Total Valid

128

Yes- IEP 31 (16)51.6% (11)35.5% (1)3.2% (3)9.7% 0.0% (3)9.7%

No-IEP 93 (10)10.8% (20)21.5% (29)31.2% (34)36.6% 0.0% (34)36.6%

504 4 (1)25.5% (2)50.0% 0.0% (1)25.0% 0.0% (1)25.5%

Grade 7

Total Valid

120

Economically Disadvantage

No 60 (3)5.0% (11)18.3% (23)38.3% (17)28.3% (6)10.0% (23)38.3%

Yes 60 (2)3.3% (13)21.7% (25)41.7% (19)31.7% (1)1.7% (20)33.3%

Grade 8

Total Valid

124

No 59 (11)18.6% (9)15.3% (17)28.8% (22)37.3% 0.0% (22)37.3%

Yes 65 (15)23.1% (22)33.8% (13)20.0% (15)23.1% 0.0% (15)23.1%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

Memorial Grade 7MATHEMATICS

Count of Valid Test Scores

Did Not Yet Meet

Partially

Met

Approached

Expectations

Met

Expectations

ExceededExpectations

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 7 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 50 (1)2.0% (12)24.0% (20)40.0% (15)30.0% (2)4.0% (17)34.0%

American Indian 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1)100.0% 0.0% (1)100.0%

Asian 6 0.0% (1)16.7% (1)16.7% (1)16.7% (3)50.0% (4)66.7%

Black or African Am 3 (1)33.3% 0.0% (1)33.3% (1)33.3% 0.0% (1)33.3%

Pacific Islander 1 0.0% 0.0% (1)100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

White 58 (3)5.2% (11)19.0% (25)43.1% (17)29.3% (2)3.4% (19)32.8%

Two or More Races 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1)100.0% 0.0% (1)100.0%

Grade Level 7 Gender

Female 63 (3)4.8% (9)14.3% (32)50.8% (16)25.4% (3)4.8% (19)30.2%

Male 57 (2)3.5% (15)26.3% (16)28.1% (20)35.1% (4)7.0% (24)42.1%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

Memorial Grade 8MATHEMATICS

Count of Valid Test Scores

Did Not Yet Meet

Partially

Met

ApproachedExpectations

Met

Expectations

ExceededExpectations

District % >= Level 4

Grade Level 8 Ethnicity/ Race

Hispanic/Latino 51 (14)27.5% (11)21.6% (17)33.3% (9)17.6% 0.0% (9)17.6%

American Indian 1 0.0% (1)100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Asian 1 (1)100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Black or African Am 7 0.0% (1)14.3% (1)14.3% (5)71.4% 0.0% (5)71.4%

Pacific Islander 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

White 63 (10)15.9% (18)28.6% (12)19.0% (23)36.5% 0.0% (23)36.5%

Two or More Races 1 (1)100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Grade Level 8 Gender

Female 57 (8)14.0% (12)21.1% (18)31.6% (19)33.3% 0.0% (19)33.3%

Male 67 (18)26.9% (19)28.4% (12)17.9% (18)26.9% 0.0% (18)26.9%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC Administrations

MEMORIAL GRADE 8 - ALGEBRACount of Valid

Test Scores

Not Yet

Meeting

Partially

Meeting

Approaching

Expectations

Meeting

Expectations

Exceeding

Expectation

District % >=

Level 4

Students with Disabilities

Yes- IEP 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

No-IEP 29 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (26)89.7% (3)10.3% (29)100.0%

504 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Economic Disadvantage

No 24 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (22)91.7% (2)8.3% (24)100%

Yes 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (4)80.0% (1)20.0% (5)100%

Race/ Ethnicity

Hispanic/Latino 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (8)100% 0.0% (8)100%

American Indian 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Asian 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1)100.0% 0.0% (1)100.0%

Black or African Am 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1)100.0% 0.0% (1)100.0%

Pacific Islander 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1)100.0% 0.0% (1)100.0%

White 17 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (14)82.4% (3)17.6% (17)100.0%

Two or More Races 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1)100.0% 0.0% (1)100.0%

Woodland Park’s 2017 Spring PARCC AdministrationsGrades 3-8 Limited English Proficiency

Count of

Valid Test

Scores

Did Not Yet

Meet

Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially

Met

Expectations'

(Level 2)

Approached

Expectations

(Level 3)

Met

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeded

Expectations

(Level 5)

District

% >=

Level 4

Grade Level Limited English Proficient- Mathematics

3 2 (1)50% (1)50% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

4 4 (1)25% (2)50% (1)25% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

5 2 (1)25% (1)25% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

6 4 (1)25% (2)25% (1)25% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

7 3 (1)33.3% 0.0% (2)66.6%% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

8 6 (1)16.6% (3)50.0% (1)16.6% (1)16.6% 0.0% (1)16.6%

Limited English Proficient-English Language Arts/Literacy

3 1 (1)100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

4 3 (1)33.3% (1)33.3% (1)33.3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

5 2 (2)100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

6 3 (1)33.3% (2)66.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

7 1 (1)100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

8 4 0.0% (3)75.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1)25% (1)25.0%

PARCC - Cohort- Percent Proficient

Grade 3

2015

Grade 4

2016

Grade 5

2017

Increase/

Decrease in class

(4 to 5)Math 36% 33% 31.7% -1.3

ELA 33% 39% * 45% +6

Grade 4

2015

Grade 5

2016

Grade 6

2017

Increase/Decrease in

class (5-6)Math 27% 29%* 37.5 +8.5

ELA 31% 39%* 54.4 +15.4

Grade 5

2015

Grade 6

2016

Grade 7

2017

Increase/Decrease

in class (5-6)Math 33% 39% 35.8 -3.2

ELA 33% 50% 52.5 +2.5

Grade 6

2015

Grade 7

2016

Grade 8

2017

Increase/Decrease

in class (6-7)

Math 30% 39% 29.8 -9.2

ELA 33% 45% 47.7 +2.7

Grade 3

2016

Grade 4

2017

Increase/

Decrease in class

(4 to 5)Math 49.1 22.1 -27ELA 35.1 36.4 +1.3

Parent Resources

▪ Information on the PARCC Student Reports: www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/parcc/scores/

▪ Understanding the student score reports (with translations): understandthescore.org/

▪ New Jersey Department of Education– http://www.nj.gov/education/sca/parcc/

▪ PARCC– http://www.parcconline.org/resources/parent-resources– Performance Level Descriptors

▪ http://www.parcconline.org/news-and-video/230-performance-level-descriptors

▪ Be a Learning Hero– http://bealearninghero.org/

PARCC: What’s the data story?

▪ Math consultant-time reduced

▪ Language Arts consultant- time increased

▪ Language Arts Curriculum refined

▪ Programming

NJASKNew Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge

Science Grades 4 & 8

NJASK Science

NJASK Science Guidelines for Student Assessment

▪ 95% of each student group must participate in the assessment process.

▪ Students enrolled in the district for less than one year will not be included in the accountability process.

▪ Students with severe disabilities must be assessed using the DLM.

▪ LEP students must be assessed.

▪ Out-of-district students are included in their home school’s accountability process.

State Testing Sub-Groups

Special Education

Limited English Proficient

Gender

Ethnicity

Economic Status

Migrant Status

Levels of Proficiency

▪ Advanced Proficient 250–300

▪ Proficient 200–249

▪ Partially Proficient 100–199

Partially Proficient is considered to be below the state minimum level of proficiency.

NJASK Science

Partially

ProficientProficient Advanced Proficient

Proficient or Advanced Proficient

Comparative Data with DFG and State of NJ

2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017DFG

(DE) 2017NJ 2017

Grade

47.0% 14.8% 19.4%

+12.4

%68.0% 52.5% 52.4% -15.6 25.0% 32.8% 28.2% +3.2% 93% 85.3% 80.6% 89.4% -8.8% 85.5% -5.5%

Grade

8

31.0

%31.1% 36.6% +5.5% 59% 50% 52.3% -6.7 10% 18.9% 11.1% +1.1% 69% 68.9% 63.4% 74.7% -11.3% 73.2% -9.8%

Woodland Park 2017 Comparison to State NJASK

Partially Proficient

(Level 1)

Proficient Advanced Proficient

District District State State District District State State District District State State

2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017

Grade 4 14.8 19.4 7.1 14.4% 52.5 52.4 43.6 40.1 32.8 28.2 49.3 45.4

Grade 8 31.1 36.6 26.1 26.8 50.0 52.3 51.0 46.6 18.9 11.1 22.6 26.6

NJASK Science 4 & 8

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Grade 4 2015 Grade 4 2016 Grade 4 2017 Grade 8 2015 Grade 8 2016 Grade 8 2017

Science 4 & 8

Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

93%68.9%69% 63.4%

80.6%85.3%

NJASK Science Grade 4-2017Count of Valid Test

Scores

Partially

P0roficient

Proficient Advanced

Proficient

District % at or

above Proficient

Limited English Proficient

Current LEP 2 (2)100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Former LEP 8 (3)37.5% (4)50.0% (1)12.50% (5)62.5%

Students with Disabilities

Yes- IEP 16 (5)31.3% (10)62.5% (1)6.3% 68.8%

No-IEP 106 (17)16.0% (55)51.9% (34)32.1% (89)84%

Economic Disadvantage

No 63 (10)15.9% (31)49.2% (22)34.9% (53)89.0%

Yes 61 (14)23.0% (34)55.7% (13)21.3% (47)77.0%

Race/ Ethnicity

White 61 (10)16.4% (33)54.1% (18)29.5% (51)83.6%

Black or African Am. 3 (2)66.7% (1)33.3% 0.0% 33.3%

Asian 6 (1)16.7% (2)33.3% (3)50.0% (5)83.3%

Pacific Islander 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Hispanic 53 (11)20.8% (28)52.8% (14)26.4% (42)79.2%

Am. Indian 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Other 1 0.0% (1)100.0% 0.0% (1)100.0%

NJASK Science Grade 8-2016Count of Valid Test

Scores

Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient District % at or

above Proficient

Limited English Proficient

Current LEP 6 (6)100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Former LEP 2 0.0% (2)100.0% 0.0% (2)100.0%

Students with Disabilities

Yes- IEP 30 (21)70.0% (8)26.7% (1)3.3% (9)30%

No-IEP 117 (29)24.8% (72)61.5% (16)13.7% (88)75.2%

Economic Disadvantage

No 91 (26)28.6% (51)56.0% (14)15.4% (55)71.4%

Yes 62 (3)48.4% (29)46.8% (3)4.8% (32)51.6%

Race/ Ethnicity

White 81 (25)30.9% (46)56.8% (10)12.3% (56)69.1%

Black or African Am. 8 (1)12.5% (7)87.5% 0.0% (7)87.5%

Asian 2 (1)50.0% (1)50.0% 0.0% (1)50.0%

Pacific Islander 1 0.0% (1)100.0% 0.0% (1)100.0%

Hispanic 58 (27)46.6% (24)41.4% (7)12.1% (31)53.5%

Am. Indian 1 (1)100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Other 2 (1)50.0% (1)50.0% 0.0% (1)50.0%

NJ ASK: What’s the data story?

▪ Science: Middle School- 1st Year curriculum and resources 2016-2017

▪ Science: Elementary- implementation of new standards, curriculum and resources 2017-18

Recommended