Overall summary of missing values VariablesCasesValues Supplementary Figure 1. Overall summary of...

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Supplementary Figure 3. Modification of ERAS. Free blood was implemented into ERAS. The new parameter was scored with 1 point and replaced by "level of hemoglobin" (not significant in the univariate analysis). The AUC of the modified ERAS was improved (0.75; 95% CI 0.65 − 0.86; p

Citation preview

Overall summary of missing values

Variables Cases Values

Supplementary Figure 1. Overall summary of missing values. Variables represents the ratio of missing parameters overall. Cases represent the ratio of patients with complete data. Values represent the ratio of single variables available for every patient.

Missing values Valid Scores

GAS 2 (2.2%) 90 (97.8%)

VSGNE rAAA Risk Score 5 (5.4%) 87 (94.5%)

ERAS 6 (6.5%) 86 (93.5%)

H.-Index 18 (19.6%) 74 (80.4%)

C D

A BVSGNE rAAA risk score

1-Sensitivity

Spec

ifici

ty

AUC = 0.76 (0.66 − 0.87)*

ERAS

1-Sensitivity

Spec

ifici

ty

AUC = 0.71 (0.60 − 0.82)*

GAS

1-Sensitivity

Spec

ifici

ty

AUC = 0.75 (0.64 − 0.85)* AUC = 0.68 (0.56 − 0.80)*

H. Index

1-Sensitivity

Spec

ifici

ty

Supplementary Figure 2. Discrimination of scoring models was calculated via the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). *indicates a p value < 0.01.

Supplementary Figure 3. Modification of ERAS. Free blood was implemented into ERAS. The new parameter was scored with 1 point and replaced by "level of hemoglobin" (not significant in the univariate analysis). The AUC of the modified ERAS was improved (0.75; 95% CI 0.65 − 0.86; p <0.01 versus 0.71; 95% CI 0.60 − 0.82; p = 0.001) and showed a high accuracy in calibration (χ2= 0.04; p=0.98).

In-h

ospi

tal s

urvi

val

1-Sensitivity

Spec

ifici

ty

A B

Modified ERASERAS

Recommended