View
7
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Clemson UniversityTigerPrints
All Theses Theses
12-2012
Novel Electron Shuttling CompoundsRamasubramanian NeerajaClemson University, neerajaram88@gmail.com
Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses
Part of the Environmental Engineering Commons
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorizedadministrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact kokeefe@clemson.edu.
Recommended CitationNeeraja, Ramasubramanian, "Novel Electron Shuttling Compounds" (2012). All Theses. 1518.https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1518
NOVEL ELECTRON SHUTTLING COMPOUNDS
A Thesis
Presented to
the Graduate School of
Clemson University
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Master of Science
Environmental Engineering and Earth Science
by
Neeraja Ramasubramanian
December 2012
Accepted by:
Dr. Kevin T. Finneran, Committee Chair
Dr. David Freedman
Dr. Brain Powell
ii
ABSTRACT
Electron mediator’s usage in remediation technologies might be an excellent
alternative to increase the rate of transformation of various contaminants such as
nitroamine, polyhalogenated compounds and many others. Employing electron shuttles
open up different pathways for the contaminant transformation and the reaction goes to
completion at a much faster rate. Anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) has been
known to be a model electron shuttle with good shuttling capacity followed by humic
acids. But the necessity for identifying electron shuttles suitable for field applications is
important. As remediation technologies will command application of the shuttles on a
large scale, tracing shuttles which are cheap, easily available and non-toxic is vital. This
study mainly aimed at studying the efficiency of military smoke dyes as electron shuttles.
Dispersed red 11 and quinoline yellow were the two military smoke dyes tested.
This study demonstrates that the smoke dyes act as electron shuttles for
transforming poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxide to reactive Fe(II). Higher extent of
transformation could be observed in amendments with the electron shuttles and disperse
red 11 was found to be as effective as AQDS in increasing the transformation. Increase
in concentration proportionately increased the shuttling ability as well. The shuttling
ability of quinoline yellow was found to be lower than the other shuttles. Electron
mediated transformation was also investigated in amendments with royal demolition
explosive (RDX) as the electron acceptor. The military smoke dyes did not transfer
electrons directly to RDX. The experiments were also carried at two different pH
conditions to study the variation in shuttling ability with the change in pH conditions. A
iii
higher pH condition did not bring a significant increase in Fe(III) transformation in
amendments though a minor increase could be observed in the Fe(II) concentration. The
pH variation had no impact on the RDX amendments. Though the electron shuttles
exhibited limited capacity to transform RDX directly, their potential to transform Fe(III)
to Fe(II) suggests that they can be exploited to reduce RDX by a Fe(II) mediated
pathway.
iv
DEDICATION
This thesis is dedicated to my brother Mr. Arun Shrrivats Ramasubramanian, who
was my greatest propulsive force for bringing in confidence and to my parents Mr. and
Mrs. Ramasubramanian. Their encouraging words and support were the sole reasons
which helped me to overcome my obstacles during these two years. I cannot thank them
enough for bringing this great positive change in my life.
v
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS
I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Kevin T. Finneran for giving me this
opportunity for carrying out research and also for encouraging me to come up with ideas
and work with confidence. It was a great experience working with him and this
opportunity certainly did change my way of thinking towards the positive side. I would
also like to thank my committee members Dr. David Freedman and Dr. Brian Powell for
their willingness to offer help whenever needed.
I would like to thank my colleagues Kay Dunnett Millerick, Jovan Popovic,
Christopher Weber and Jolanta Niedzwiecka for providing me with support and
assistance. I would also like to thank my lab manager Anne H. Cummings for her
readiness to help me trouble shoot issues related to analytical instruments whenever
needed. I am also obligated to thank all other staff members of the environmental
engineering department. I would like to extend my gratitude to all my well-wishers and
friends in the department who never hesitated to provide a hand of help at the time of
need. A special mention about Ademola Bakenne for the kind of wonderful person he had
been and for all the help and kindness which he had rendered throughout my period of
stay here. Last but definitely not the least, I thank almighty god for blessing me with this
wonderful opportunity.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOVEL ELECTRON SHUTTLING COMPOUNDS ................................................................................... i
ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................... ii
DEDICATION .................................................................................................................................... iv
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... v
TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................... vi
LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................. viii
LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. ix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................... x
CHAPTER 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 1
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 1
Research Objectives ................................................................................................................. 3
CHAPTER 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 4
LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Physical and Chemical Properties of Cyclic Nitramines ........................................................ 5
2.2 Toxicity of RDX and TNT ..................................................................................................... 7
2.3 Environmental Behavior of RDX and HMX ........................................................................ 7
2.3.1 Sorption/Desorption ........................................................................................................ 8
2.3.2 Photolysis ........................................................................................................................ 8
2.3.3 Biotic Transformation of Cyclic Nitramines ................................................................... 9
2.3.3.1 Aerobic Degradation of RDX .................................................................................... 10
2.3.3.2 Anaerobic Transformation of RDX ............................................................................ 10
2.4 Redox Mediators .................................................................................................................. 12
2.5 Compounds with Electron Shuttling Capacity ..................................................................... 14
CHAPTER 3 ...................................................................................................................................... 17
ABIOTIC TRANSFORMATION OF POORLY CRYSTALLINE Fe(III)OXIDE IN THE PRESENCE OF
ELECTRON SHUTTLING COMPOUNDS ............................................................................................ 17
3.1 Materials and Methods ......................................................................................................... 19
3.1.1 Preparation of Stock Solutions ...................................................................................... 19
vii
3.1.2 Experimental Sample Design ........................................................................................ 21
3.1.3 Ferrozine Assay ............................................................................................................. 24
3.2 Results and Discussion ......................................................................................................... 24
3.2.1Transformation of Fe(III) in Amendments with Lower Shuttle Concentration .............. 24
3.2.2 Transformation of Fe(III) in Amendments with a Higher Shuttle Concentration ........ 29
3.2.3 Effect of pH on Transformation of Fe(III) .................................................................... 33
3.3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 38
CHAPTER 4 ...................................................................................................................................... 39
ABIOTIC TRANSFORMATION OF HEXAHYDRO-1,3,5,-TRINITRO-1,3,5 TRIAZINE IN THE PRESENCE
OF ELECTRON SHUTTLING COMPOUNDS ....................................................................................... 39
4.1 Materials and Methods ......................................................................................................... 42
4.1.1 Preparation of Stock Solutions ...................................................................................... 42
4.1.2 Experimental Sample Design ........................................................................................ 43
4.1.3 Analytical Methods ....................................................................................................... 44
4.2 Results and Discussion ......................................................................................................... 46
4.2.1 Transformation Experiment at Lower Alkaline pH Conditions .................................... 46
4.2.2 Transformation Experiment at Higher Alkaline pH Conditions .................................... 48
4.3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 51
CHAPTER 5 ...................................................................................................................................... 52
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................... 52
APPENDIX ....................................................................................................................................... 55
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................... 56
viii
LIST OF TABLES
2.1 Physical and chemical properties of RDX, HMX, TNT .............................. 07
3.1 Treatment description for iron transformation experiment .......................... 25
4.1 Treatment description for RDX transformation experiment ........................ 50
ix
LIST OF FIGURES
2.1 Structures of explosive compound ............................................................... 05
2.2 Structure of disperse red 11 ......................................................................... 15
2.3 Structure of AQDS ....................................................................................... 15
2.4 Structure of quinoline yellow....................................................................... 15
3.1 Fe(II) accumulation in amendments with 0.1 mM electron shuttles and
cysteine as the reductant .............................................................................. 26
3.2 Fe(II) accumulation in amendments with 0.1 mM electron shuttles and
ascorbic acid as the reductant ..................................................................... 28
3.3 Fe(II) accumulation in amendments with 0.5 mM electron shuttles and
cysteine as the reductant .............................................................................. 30
3.4 Fe(II) accumulation in amendments with 0.5 mM electron shuttles and
ascorbic acid as the reductant ..................................................................... 31
3.5 Comparison plot of electron shuttles at different concentrations ................ 32
3.6 Fe(II) accumulation in amendments with 0.5 mM electron shuttles and
cysteine as the reductant at a higher alkaline pH ......................................... 35
3.7 Fe(II) accumulation in amendments with 0.5 mM electron shuttles and
ascorbic acid as the reductant at a higher alkaline pH ................................ 36
3.8 Comparison plot of electron shuttles at different pH conditions ................ 37
4.1 RDX transformation in amendments with 0.5 mM electron shuttles and
the reductants ............................................................................................... 47
4.2 RDX transformation in amendments with 0.5 mM electron shuttles and
reductants at a higher pH ........................................................................... 50
x
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AQDS - Anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate
CERL - Construction Engineering Research Laboratory
CL-20 - 2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane
ES - Electron Shuttle
HEPES - 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid
HMX - Octogen
HNB - Hexanitrobenzene
HPLC - High Performance Liquid Chromatography
RDX - Royal Demolition Explosive
RM - Redox Mediators
MNX - Hexahydro-1-nitroso-3,5-dinitro-1,3,5-triazine
PTFE - Polytetrafluoroethylene
TNT - 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene
TNX - Hexahydro -1,3,5-Trinitroso-1,3,5-Triazine
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The chemical and petrochemical industrial sector and munitions manufacturing
units release thousands of compounds into the environment. Many of these compounds
pave way for contaminations in various realms. The global market of these industries is
huge and the prominence of especially the petrochemical industry is quite intense in the
United States. Over a past couple of years, the sales in the USA have summed up to
$110.4 billion for 26 companies in the chemical sector (Vanderzee et al., 2009). Linked
to the great economic benefits, large volumes of waste water containing toxic and
recalcitrant chemicals are being discharged. Some of the compounds released during this
process are unaffected during aerobic waste water treatment .When the treated waste
water is released into the environment, they accumulate in different areas leading to soil
and groundwater pollution (Vanderzee et al., 2009). Though these contaminants undergo
reductive transformation under anaerobic conditions, the mechanism involved is slow due
to electron transfer limitations (Rodgers et al., 2001; Vanderzee et al., 2001).
The problem of effective contact between the contaminant molecule and the cells
involved in degradation is another limitation encountered in case of biotic transformation
involving microorganisms. To overcome these drawbacks, the usage of electron shuttles
might prove out to be an effective solution.
Electron shuttles (also referred to as redox mediators (RM)) are organic molecules
that can be reversibly oxidized and reduced. These molecules have the capacity to serve
as electron carriers in multiple redox reactions. RM accelerate reactions by lowering the
2
activation energy of the total reaction and their presence might be the prerequisite for
some reactions to take place (Cervantes et al., 2004;2006). Reduction of electron shuttles
can be promoted by reactions involving reductants commonly found in anaerobic
environments such as sulfide, cysteine and Fe(II) and various other specific electron
donors used in remediation technologies.
As reduction of electron shuttles might also be connected with the oxidation of
organic substrates involving microbes, humic substances and their quinoid analogues
often play a vital role (Schwarzenbach et al., 1990; Dror et al., 2004). In the recent
studies conducted by Kwon and Finneran (2006; 2008), various compounds which are
effective as electron shuttles have been evaluated and initiatives to determine cost
effective electron shuttles are still being conducted. Though all quinone containing
molecules have the potential to shuttle electrons, identifying cost effective shuttles is
important which will increase their usability in field applications. The present study of
interest looks at the shuttling capacity of specific smoke dyes to enhance the
transformation rates of RDX. Military smoke dyes are dyes which are used for signaling
purposes in the military areas. These dyes being easily available might provide a good
solution for replacing the shuttles which are not viable for field applications. Moreover,
these dyes might already be present in the contaminated military zones . This might
mean that no addition of the dye from an external source will be required to treat the
contamination in these zones resulting in reduced remediation cost.
3
Research Objectives
In this study, military smoke dyes have been evaluated as electron shuttles for
enhancing the reduction rate of the cyclic nitramine compound – Royal Demolition
Explosive (RDX) and poorly crystalline iron(III) oxide. The smoke dyes of interest
include disperse red 11 and quinoline yellow. Fe(III) transformation was also evaluated
so as to assess indirect reduction mechanisms to transform RDX. The experiments carried
out aimed at determining:
The capacity of disperse red 11 and quinoline yellow to bring about the
direct transformation of RDX which involves the transfer of electrons
from the reduced smoke dyes to the RDX without the involvement of a
mediating pathway;
The ability of the smoke dyes to transform poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxide
and the effect of the electron shuttle (ES) concentrations on increasing the
extent of transformation; and
The effect of pH on the electron shuttling ability of the smoke dyes.
4
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
Cyclic nitramines constitute a group of nitrate explosives made of a ring structure
comprised of alternating carbon and nitrogen atoms. Amines and nitro groups are
substituted in these molecules at the N position. They are produced by the direct
nitration of hexamine with ammonium nitrate and nitric acid in an acetic/acetic
anhydride solvent. Various anthropogenic activities including military operations and
industrial manufacturing processes result in the release of the cyclic nitramines into the
environment (Agency for Toxic substances and Disease Registry 1995; Agency for Toxic
substances and Disease Registry, 2010). These compounds are toxic and have hence
drawn the attention of researchers for remedial activities as they might be carcinogenic
and mutagenic. Cyclic nitramines are persistent in the environment. They exhibit low
solubility and exist as particulate matter in the soil and air.
The concentration of cyclic nitramine compounds in polluted area depends on the
proximity of the region to the source of contamination. The nitramines are released from
various sources including waste leaks from storage points, sewage discharges, explosive
detonation zones and discharge of pink water from industrial units. Pink water formation
results when water used for cleaning the explosive manufacturing units is released after
the cleaning process, carrying residual amounts of RDX. The nitramine compounds
have long half-lives which depict their presence in any environment for a long period of
time as they are resistant to degradation.
5
2.1 Physical and Chemical Properties of Cyclic Nitramines
Cyclic nitramines are classified as primary or secondary depending upon their
susceptibility to ignition which depends upon their ignition capacity. The structures of the
commonly known explosives compounds are presented in Figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1 Structures of explosive compounds.
6
Table 2.1: The physical and chemical properties of RDX, HMX, TNT (Data sourced
from Material safety data sheets)
Name RDX HMX TNT
Chemical
Formula
C3H6N6O6 C4H8N8O8 C7H5N3O6
Melting point
(◦C)
204 276-280 80-82
Solubility in
water (mg/L)
42 5 130
Mass density
(g/cm3)
1.82 1.96 1.5-1.6
Vapour Pressure
(1 bar, 20◦C)
5.3 x 10-12
4.3 x 10-17
7.2 x 10-9
Henry’s Law
constant: kH (bar
m3
mol-1
)
6.3 x 10-8
to 1.96 x 10-11
2.6 x 10-15
4.57 x 10-7
to 1.1 x 10-8
Octanol/water
partitioning
coefficient
log(kOW)
0.86 0.061 1.86
Appearance and
Odor
White or Gray
powder,odorless
White or Gray
powder,odorless
Yellow flakes with
bitter almond taste
7
2.2 Toxicity of RDX and TNT
Cyclic nitramines are classified as class C carcinogens, which refers to
compounds having suggestive cancer potential. The compounds pose a risk when they
come in contact via inhalation, direct contact with skin and ingestion (Eaton, 2011).
Plants exhibit tolerance to explosive compounds till specific levels. Specific plant species
tend to accumulate TNT in their roots and bioaccumulate RDX. Due to this mechanism
of bioaccumulation, RDX was noticed in the edible portions of the plant in a few cases
(Pennington and Brannon, 2002). Explosives exhibit minimal amount of toxicity to
animal species. Effects of exposure were observed to be sub lethal at a dosage of 6
mg/kg/day (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1995).
2.3 Environmental Behavior of RDX and HMX
The degradation rate of explosives is very slow in environmental systems. The
process often does not proceed beyond the reduction of the nitro groups to amines. With
RDX, reduction of the three nitro groups yields hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitroso-1,3,5-triazine
(TNX) and hence accumulation of mineralization products is low in the contaminated
zones (Pennington and Brannon, 2002). Reduction occurs more readily under anaerobic
conditions than aerobic conditions. Cyclic nitramines are non-volatile and have poor
water solubility. The magnitude of adsorption to soil of RDX, HMX and other cyclic
nitramines is dependent upon the nature of the soil. Presence of high clay content
promotes greater degree of adsorption (Ryon and Pal, 1984). The main sinks of nitramine
compound accumulation are soil, sediment and water.
8
2.3.1 Sorption/Desorption
The movement of cyclic nitramine compounds in the subsurface environments is
influenced by the sorption/desorption processes. These mechanisms are governed by the
amount of organic carbon content present in the soil (foc) apart from the type of clay
minerals present in the contaminated zone. The amount of contaminant retained by the
soil is calculated by the linearized adsorption isotherm given by the following relation:
Cs=Kd Cl
where Cs is the amount of compound retained by the soil (mg/kg), Cl is the compound
concentration (mg/l) in the aqueous phase and Kd is the adsorption coefficient (cm3/g).
The value of the adsorption coefficient is calculated based on the carbon partition
coefficient and the organic carbon concentration in a specific area(Robert and Robin,
1998) which is given by the following relation:
Kd = foc x koc
where foc gives the fraction of organic carbon present in the soil and koc gives the ratio of
the mass of the chemical that is adsorbed in the soil per unit mass of the organic carbon
present in the soil per the equilibrium chemical concentration in a solution.
2.3.2 Photolysis
The photolytic degradation of HMX and RDX has been studied in various areas
where the concentration of the contaminant has been found to decrease upon light
exposure. The degradation rate of the contaminants is described by the following relation:
lnC =ln C◦ -kt
9
where C◦ (mg/l) gives the initial concentration, k (time-1
) represents the degradation
constant and C gives the concentration of the compound at the time of measurement. The
photolytic degradation of the nitramine compounds have been found to increase with
lesser turbidity and depths. At lesser turbidity and depth conditions, more amount of light
energy tends to penetrate through a given area thus increasing the rate of transformation
(Robert and Robin, 1998).
2.3.3 Biotic Transformation of Cyclic Nitramines
Biotic transformation involves the degradation of contaminants into a less
complex form by the activity of microorganisms present in the region of contamination.
The microbes have specific enzymes which facilitates their intake of contaminants.
Cyclic nitramine compounds fall into the major class of organic compounds which serve
as both as an electron donor (carbon source which serves as the base for cell components
synthesis) as well as an electron acceptor in the electron transport chain which help the
microbes to derive energy (Eaton, 2011). Nitramine compounds are degraded by both
aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms.
The aerobic microbes degrade the pollutants in the presence of oxygen while the
anaerobic microbes utilize other electron donors such as nitrate (NO3-), sulfate (SO4
-) and
metals such as iron (Fe(III)) and manganese (Mn(IV)). Due to the ability of these
anaerobic microbes to use different donors, they are found in numerous environments
with a varied electron donor conditions. Due to this characteristic, the anaerobes degrade
various pollutant molecules as well.
10
2.3.3.1 Aerobic Degradation of RDX
Past experimental results indicate the potential of aerobic degradation
mechanisms to mineralize these explosive compounds (Binks et al., 1995; Coleman et al.,
1998; Hawari et al., 2000). Several bacterial species have been known to degrade RDX
when supplied as the sole nitrogen source. Nitrite was found to be a prime product
formed when RDX was used as a nitrogen source. The intermediates and the enzymes
involved in this transformation mechanism have not been identified. Studies conducted
with white rot fungi indicated hexahydro-1-nitroso-3,5-dinitro-3,5 dinitro-1,3,5-triazine
(MNX) to be the only intermediate in this pathway of transformation (Hawari et al.,
2000).
Another study using Rhodococcus soil isolate indicated the formation of nitrous
oxide as a product of RDX degradation under aerobic conditions. Though different
intermediates have been formed in this pathway, conclusive results have not been
determined. The metabolites formed, the enzymes and the microbial species involved in
the aerobic degradation pathway are still under research. When compared to anaerobic
mechanisms, aerobic mechanisms bring a lesser degree of transformation of the
nitroaromatic compounds as they degrade more slowly under aerobic conditions and
specific microbial populations are required for this degradation.
2.3.3.2 Anaerobic Transformation of RDX
Cyclic nitramine compounds tend to accumulate in the sediments more than in
water or air systems owing to their high hydrophobic and low vapor pressure values
(Eaton, 2011). As these sediment areas contaminated with the explosive compounds tend
11
to be anoxic, anaerobic bacteria often play a prime role in bringing about the
transformation of these compounds. In case of anaerobic degradation pathways, different
reducing conditions might be present and the electron acceptors in these conditions will
aid the degradation of the contaminant. Some of the electron acceptors found in these
environments include nitrate, sulfate and Fe(III) (Kwon and Finneran, 2006). In nitrate
reducing condition, a high percentage of RDX mineralization was observed in the native
soil environment in the study conducted by Bradley et al (2005). Poor removal of RDX
has also been recorded under nitrate reducing conditions depicting the inhibitory effect of
nitrate on RDX transformation (Freedman and Sutherland, 1998). The onset of RDX
degradation was observed in this system only when the nitrate concentration dropped to
low levels. Under manganese reducing conditions, mineralization of RDX was seen in
aquifer sediment microcosms (Bradley and Dinicola, 2005).
Sulfate reducing conditions have also been identified to be effective for bringing
transformation of explosive compounds. Sulfate being widely present in subsurface
anaerobic environments, it can be exploited for the transformation of explosive
compounds. Previous studies conducted with a specific sulfate reducing species resulted
in the removal of about 75 to 95% of RDX and MNX present within a time span of about
21 days (Boopathy et al., 1998). Species of Desulfovibrio have proved to have the ability
of degrading RDX when used as the main carbon source (Adrain and Arnett, 2009).
Sulfate reducing bacteria can thus play a main role in transforming RDX compounds.
Though the reducing environments discussed above are considered for
manipulating RDX transformation, Fe(III) reducing conditions have been given the
12
utmost importance as Fe(III) forms are the most widely present electron acceptors in the
subsurface, anoxic environments (Lovely et al., 1995). One of the viable methods under
investigation for bringing about transformation of RDX under Fe(III) reducing conditions
involves the use of extracellular electron shuttling compounds (redox mediators).
2.4 Redox Mediators
Redox mediators are capable of transferring electrons between a variety of
compounds including both organic and inorganic. The reduction process proceeds both in
a biotic and abiotic manner. In case of an abiotic mechanism, the reaction is triggered by
using specific reductants commonly found in nature such as sulfide, cysteine and iron.
These reductants are mainly prevalent in anaerobic environments (Schwarzenbach et al.,
1990; Curtis and Reinhard, 1994). The reaction with electron mediators can also be
initiated using other specific donors used in remediation technologies like zero valent
iron (ZVI), Ti(III)/citrate (Dror and Schlautman, 2004; Keum and Li, 2004).
Anaerobic oxidation of organic substrates by microorganisms also paves way for
the reduction of redox mediators by biological means. Redox mediators involved in these
reactions include humic substances and their quinoid analogues (Cervantes et al., 2004).
The other organic susbstrates might also include short fatty acid chains, monosaccharides
and alcohols (Lovely et al., 1996). Reoxidation of redox mediators in a redox reaction
results in the transfer of electrons from the reduced mediators to contaminant molecules.
As Fe(III) reducing organisms are widespread, some decontamination strategies
are based on the physiology of these microbes. In order to explore their effectiveness
many studies have been conducted to observe the transformation of contaminants in the
13
presence of various Fe(III) forms and the associated microbial community present. One
such study involving RDX reduction tailored in the presence of poorly crystalline Fe(III)
was slow and the amount of metabolites accumulated was also of lower magnitude
(Kwon and Finneran, 2006).Addition of humics and AQDS (anthraquinone-2,6-
disulfonate) however increased the rate of transformation indicating the potential role
played by these molecules as electron shuttles.Therefore a strategy involving the native
iron reducing community, Fe(III) forms present in the given environment and electron
shuttling compounds might bring about faster rates of degradation. This is because
various pathways come into play which ultimately results in the degradation of RDX. The
likely pathways are as follows:
Pathway 1: Direct reduction of RDX by the Fe(III) reducing community;
Pathway 2: Reduction of Fe(III) by the Fe(III) reducers present and the
transformation of RDX by the reactive Fe(II) formed;
Pathway 3: Reduction of the electron shuttling compound by the Fe(III) reducers and
the transformation of RDX by the reduced shuttles; and
Pathway 4: Reactive Fe(II) formation by the reduced shuttles which in turn reduces
the RDX.
Though the electron shuttling compounds have the potential for enhancing degradation
rate, delineating electron shuttles which are suitable for field application is an important
aspect of this strategy.
14
2.5 Compounds with Electron Shuttling Capacity
All compounds having the quinone functional group have the capacity to shuttle
electrons. Previous studies by Finneran and colleagues have involved the use of humics
extract and military smoke dye - red 9 to estimate their capacity to shuttle electrons.
These compounds possess quinone functional groups and were expected to have shuttling
capacity The aim was to compare their capacity to AQDS which is known to be a model
electron shuttle and hence their potential to be used for in-situ remediation strategies.
Raw humics extract (refers to humic substances extracted from natural materials like leaf
litter, plant and wood compost) was found to increase RDX reduction. The rates of
reduction were found to vary proportionately with the concentration of the humics
extract. RDX concentration dropped below detection limit with a concentration of 0.04
g/l of raw humics extract within a span of 120 hours. The degradation was much higher
with 0.1 g/l of humics acid and went below detectable concentration within 72 hours.
Addition of humics to Fe(III) amended incubations was found to increase the degradation
rate more(Kwon, 2009). Addition of red 9 was also found to increase the rate of RDX
degradation and the increase in rates was found to be proportional to the concentration.
For in-situ treatment strategies, the electron shuttles might have to be used in a
large scale and hence has to be inexpensive and readily available. Though AQDS and
humic substances have been known to exhibit good electron shuttling activity, using them
for field applications is not viable due to the cost associated with AQDS and the
extensive extraction procedure associated with the humic substances. Military smoke
dyes on the other hand, do not involve any extensive preparation procedure before
15
application. They are cheap and do not pose any potential environmental hazards. There
are a wide range of smoke dyes apart from red 9 and exploring the capacity of these dyes
might provide viable options for using these dyes as electron shuttles. Before tailoring
any remediation strategy using these smoke dyes, analyzing their electron shuttling
property in biotic and abiotic systems involving metal mediators will be a required step.
Structures of the electron shuttles used in this study are presented below in Figures 2.2,
2.3 and 2.4.
Figure 2.2 Disperse Red 11 Figure 2.3 AQDS
The smoke dyes tested in this experiment (Disperse Red 11 and quinoline
yellow) are quinone bearing compounds which is depicted by the structures
presented above. Disperse red 11 also known as solvent violet 26 is a red dye
which is obtained from anthraquinone.It is in the form of a dark black powder
Figure 2.4 Quinoline Yellow
16
with a density of 1.42 g/cm3 and has a flash point of 322.4
οC. It is soluble in
alcohols but exhibits a low solubility in water. It is used in textile and plastic
industries for dyeing and also in violet and red colored smoke formulations to
produce smoke bombs for signaling purposes in military. Quinoline yellow also
referred to as the food yellow 13 is in the form of yellow granules. It is soluble in
water and sparingly soluble in ethanol. It is a commonly used food dye and is also
used in smoke grenade production like disperse red 11. The smoke grenades made
out these dyes are used for signaling and combat exercises in military zones.
17
CHAPTER 3
ABIOTIC TRANSFORMATION OF POORLY CRYSTALLINE Fe(III)OXIDE IN THE
PRESENCE OF ELECTRON SHUTTLING COMPOUNDS
Metal mediated remediation is a widely used option for in-situ cleaning up of
contaminants. Metal mediated remediation involves the use of specific metal ions as
mediators to transfer electrons from the microbes to the contaminant or between the
reducing agent and the contaminant molecule. Among the widely used metal mediators,
usage of various iron forms is the most prevalent. Fe(III) reduction is an important
biogeochemical process. Ferric minerals are present in various forms (e.g. ferrihydrite,
goethite, magnetite) in subsurface environments and often act as catalysts for bringing
about various degradation processes.
Due to the abundance of Fe(III) reducing microorganisms in most of the
subsurface zones, the process of using iron transformation methods serves to be effective
for degrading different compounds in natural environments (Lovely et al., 1998). Factors
controlling the rate and magnitude of Fe(III) reduction are of interest as iron reduction
dictates the geochemistry in a variety of subsurface mechanisms. Presence of humic
substances significantly increase the reduction of Fe(III) compounds coupled with the
oxidation of organic substrates (Anderson and lovely, 1999;Lovely et al., 1996;Lovely et
al., 1998). Humic substances stimulate Fe(III) reduction due to their property of shuttling
electrons. The shuttling property exhibited by these substances is because of the presence
of quinone moieties in their structure.
18
During the reduction process, electrons produced due to the oxidation of
substrates are transferred to the quinone moieties which results in their transformation to
hydroquinones. The hydroquinones in turn reduce the Fe(III) oxides present in the
subsurface. Apart from humics there are many other compounds which contain the
quinone groups and exhibit good electron shuttling capacities. One good example is the
anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (humic acid analogue). Due to their property to switch
between their oxidized and reduced states, these electron shuttling compounds enhance
the degradation rate of the target molecule. When applied in iron reducing conditions,
they act as intermediates to aid electron transfer to the Fe(III) form present in the
environment. Past experimental data suggests that mixed biotic-abiotic reactions
involving Fe(III) reducing organisms, electron shuttling compounds and Fe(II) formed
aid in RDX degradation (Kwon and Finneran, 2006 ;Kim and Strathman, 2007).
Application of electron shuttles in a contaminated environment with iron reducing
conditions might transform the target contaminant at a faster rate. The pathway of
degradation noticed in these environments revolves around the transfer of electrons from
the iron reducers to the iron forms present in the environment. The reactive Fe(II) formed
in turn donates electrons to the target contaminant.
With electron shuttles, the rate is much faster as the shuttles keep getting
regenerated in the process and leads to a higher concentration of Fe(II) and hence a
higher magnitude of the contaminant transformation. Though application of electron
shuttles appears to be a viable option for clean up strategies, determining cost effective
19
electron shuttles for the process is equally important. Compounds containing quinone
groups are a suitable option for effective shuttling but not all quinone containing
compounds are suited for field applications.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate smoke dyes as electron shuttles in an
abiotic transformation mechanism. The system tested was abiotic and involved the use of
cysteine and ascorbic acid as electron donors with poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxide as the
sole terminal electron acceptor. Smoke dyes tested include disperse red 11 and quinoline
yellow. The data demonstrated that the smoke dyes used will serve as effective electron
shuttles from the donor to Fe(III) as the acceptor. This might be exploited in natural iron
reducing environments containing contaminants to bring about transformation.
3.1 Materials and Methods
All materials obtained were of analytical grade and commercially obtained from
authentic sources. The smoke dye disperse red 11 was obtained from U.S Army Corps of
Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL). Quinoline yellow
was obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Cysteine ≥ 97% purity, ascorbic acid ≥ 99% purity,
ferric Chloride and anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) were obtained from Sigma
Aldrich.
3.1.1 Preparation of Stock Solutions
Amorphous Fe(III) solution (iron gel) was prepared by adding 10 N NaOH to a
solution of ferric chloride (108 g/l) and the pH was adjusted to 7. The solution obtained
was transferred to centrifuge tubes (150 ml) for centrifugation (Evolution RC, Sorvall) at
20
5000 rpm for 20 minutes. After each centrifugal run, the supernatant was disposed and
the solid residue re-suspended in distilled water. This procedure of washing was repeated
nine times so as to remove the predominant amount of chloride present. After the ninth
wash, the residue was re-suspended in distilled water and mixed well (Lovely and
Elizabeth, 1986). In order to measure the concentration of the iron gel (Fegel) stock,
0.1ml of the stock solution was acidified using 4.7 ml of 0.5N HCl and 0.2 ml of
hydroxylamine HCl and was left overnight.
The concentration was measured by using a UV visible spectrophotometer at a
wavelength of 562 nm. Hydroxylamine HCl being a strong reductant, reduces the Fe(III)
present to Fe(II) which can be measured by the ferrozine assay (Stookey, 1970). The
concentration of the measured ferrous ions was used to quantify the concentration of the
Fegel stock. The stock solution used for the experiment was obtained by diluting the
mother stock prepared and quantified by the above method.
AQDS and quinoline yellow stock solutions were prepared in distilled water by
measuring out the required weight of the chemicals to obtain the stock solution of
appropriate concentration. Disperse red 11 stock solution was prepared by dissolving
disperse red 11 in ethanol. Ethanol was used as a solvent for disperse red 11 as it yields
the highest magnitude of solubility only in alcohols. The stock solutions were degassed
with nitrogen for a span of 30 minutes for the liquid medium and 7 minutes for the head
space. The degassing was done to maintain the anaerobic conditions. The AQDS and
quinoline yellow stock solutions were sterilized by autoclaving for a time period of 20
minutes at a temperature of 121◦C. Ferrozine reagent used for ferrozine assay was
21
prepared by adding HEPES and ferrozine (Fe(II) reagent) to distilled water. The solution
was brought up to its final volume after adjusting the pH to 7 using 10N NaOH.
3.1.2 Experimental Sample Design
Experimental samples were set up in 10 ml glass tubes. The experimental tubes
were prepared by sparging the tubes with N2 & CO2 in the ratio of 95:5 for experiments
conducted at a lower alkaline pH and with 100% nitrogen for experiments conducted at a
higher alkaline pH. For maintaining the lower pH (7.5-8), 30 mM bicarbonate/5% CO2
system was used. For higher alkaline pH conditions (9.2-9.3), 30 mM bicarbonate/5mM
carbonate system was used. The experimental tubes were prepared in triplicates and
contained a total sample volume of 10 ml. In order to maintain anoxic conditions, the
tubes were sealed with thick butyl rubber stoppers and crimped with aluminum caps after
degassing.
The reductants (electron donors) used in this experiment reduces Fe(III) by the
following reactions:
2C3H7NO2S C6H12N2O4S2+2H++2e
-(Ox. half reaction of Cysteine) (1)
Fe3+
+ e- Fe
2+(Red.half reaction) (2)
2C3H7NO2S +2Fe3+
C6H12N2O4S2+ 2Fe 2+
+2H+(Full reaction) (3)
C6H8O6 C6H6O6+2H++2e
-(Ox.half reaction of Ascorbic acid) (4)
Fe3+
+ e- Fe
2+(Red.half reaction) (5)
22
C6H8O6+ 2Fe3+
C6H6O6+2H++ 2Fe
2+(Full reaction) (6)
In order to achieve complete transformation of 2 mM poorly crystalline Fe(III)
oxide by cysteine and ascorbic acid, 2 mM and 1 mM concentration of the reductants was
required ,respectively. Cysteine and ascorbic acid were injected from sterile and anoxic
stock solutions so as to obtain a final concentration of 1.4 mM and 0.7 mM in the
samples, respectively. Only 70% of the stoichiometric concentration of the reductants
was amended so as to delineate the differences in transformation by using the electron
shuttles under donor deficient conditions. The Fegel was injected into the sample tubes
before sparging by using a pipette to obtain a final concentration of 2 mM in each tube.
This concentration was used so as to look at a reasonable concentration of Fe(II)
measurable by the ferrozine assay after acidification. Fe(II) produced during the
experiment might change the surface properties of the Fe(III) amended by surface
adsorption resulting in a decrease in reaction kinetics due to the change in the Fe(III)
form. This aspect was also taken care of by not amending a high concentration of Fe(III)
which might result in a higher Fe(II) formation .The electron shuttles concentrations were
selected based on previous studies using reduced AQDS as an electron shuttle which
demonstrated good shuttling ability at a concentration of 100μM-300μM (Kwon, 2009) .
This study was taken as a basis as the smoke dyes are also quinone bearing compounds
like AQDS. Biotic iron transformation experiments were also used as a basis for selecting
the concentrations where the extent of transformation was observed to be more
pronounced in the experiment with a shuttle concentration of 100μM. These results
indicated that a base concentration of 100μM might be reasonable to amend as the
23
starting concentration. Data plots demonstrating the results for the biotic experiments are
included in the appendix.
Reductants and the smoke dyes were amended by using anaerobic syringes and
needles. The experiments were initiated by injecting the reductant into the samples
containing the Fegel and the electron shuttles. Samples for Fe(II) analysis was collected
every one hour for five hours by using anaerobic syringes and needles.The samples for
the initial time point was withdrawn as soon as the reductant was injected with a time lag
of a minute. Incubation time of five hours was considered as the reductants used are good
reducing agents and this period was assumed to be reasonable to allow sufficient
transformation for delineating the extent of transformation as well as provide enough
time period for sampling without overlapping in sampling times between
amendements.The anaerobic conditions were maintained by using a gassing station. Eight
different types of amendments considered for all the experiments are specified below:
Table 3.1: Treatment Description for Iron Transformation Experiment
1 Fegel +Reductant+ AQDS
2 Fegel+Reductant+ Disperse Red 11
3 Fegel +Reductant+ Quinoline Yellow
4 Fegel + Reductant
5 Fegel+ AQDS
6 Fegel+ Disperse Red 11
7 Fegel + Quinoline Yellow
8 Fegel
24
3.1.3 Ferrozine Assay
The extent of transformation of poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxide present in the
sample was quantified by measuring the concentration of ferrous ions produced over
time. Samples were withdrawn every one hour for five hours using anaerobic syringes
and needles. The sample withdrawn was acidified using 0.5 N HCl to prevent the
oxidation of ferrous ions formed. After an hour of incubation time, to extract all the HCl
extractable iron, the samples were analyzed for ferrous ion concentration. An aliquot of
the extract was added to HEPES buffer containing Fe(II) reagent ferrozine and the
absorbance at 562 nm was quantified to measure the Fe(II) concentration.
3.2 Results and Discussion
Experiments were designed to observe the variation in the extent of electron
mshuttling by differing shuttle concentrations and pH conditions. Results presented in
this section are demonstrated by using a higher and lower value for the electron shuttle
concentrations (0.1 mM, 0.5 mM) and the pH conditions(7.5-8; 9.2-9.3) for amendments.
3.2.1Transformation of Fe(III) in Amendments with Lower Shuttle Concentration
With a 0.1 mM concentration of electron shuttle, the difference in extent of
Fe(III) transformation in samples administered with reductants + electron shuttle(ES)
and the reductant only control was observed but the extent of Fe(III) transformation was
less between these amendments.
Figure 3.1 (A, B) shows the concentration of the Fe(II) produced over time when
cysteine was used as a reductant. The Fe(II) concentration increased above 0.3 mM in all
25
the samples within a minute except for the shuttle/fegel only controls which recorded no
transformation. The highest extent of transformation was recorded by the samples
amended with disperse red 11 as the electron shuttle. About 0.453 mM concentration of
Fe(II) was produced at the first sampling time point. Though a comparatively higher
transformation was observed in the sample with disperse red 11, the concentration of
Fe(II) produced in the cysteine + AQDS amendments started to overlap with that of the
disperse red 11 after an hour of incubation.
The accumulation of Fe(II) in samples containing quinoline yellow as an electron
shuttle was less compared to the samples administered with other electron shuttles. The
initial difference in Fe(II) concentrations demonstrated by the data indicates that the
reactions occurred within 1 min and the addition of reductant coupled with the shuttling
ability of the ES resulted in rapid Fe(III) transformation within a short time frame. From
the trend demonstrated by the data, it is observed that the reaction reaches a threshold
within a short time span. This might be due to the inhibition caused by the adsorption of
Fe(II) formed onto the Fe(III) present retarding further transformation. Figure 3.1C
shows the relative Fe(II) accumulation in the cysteine and the electron shuttle amended
samples. It depicts the amount of Fe(II) produced at the initial and final time points and
gives an idea about the difference in magnitude of transformation due to the amendment
of different shuttles. From Figure 3.1C, it can be observed that the extent of
transformation on using disperse red 11 as an electron shuttle is nearly the same as that of
AQDS. The concentration of Fe(II) formed in the sample administered with quinoline
yellow has produced no enhanced transformation due to electron shuttling activity.
26
Figure 3.1: Fe(II) accumulation over time for amendments using cysteine as the
electron donor and 0.1 mM (A) AQDS & disperse red 11 as electron shuttles (B)
AQDS and quinoline yellow as electron shuttles; (C) Concentration of Fe(II)
accumulated for the initial and final time points for amendments with reductants
+ ES. Error bars represent standard deviation for triplicate samples.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe
(II)
(m
M)
Time(Hours)
Cysteine Cysteine+ AQDS Cysteine+ Disperse Red 11
AQDS Disperse Red 11 Fegel
A
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe
(II)
(m
M)
Time(Hours)
Cysteine Cysteine+ AQDS Cysteine+ Quinoline Yellow
AQDS Quinoline Yellow Fegel
B
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Cysteine+AQDS Cysteine+Disperse Red11
Cysteine+ QuinolineYellow
Fe
(II)
(m
M)
Initial Time Point
Final Time point
C
27
In treatments using ascorbic acid as reductant, the same trend was observed as
well. Figure 3.2 (A, B) shows the variation in Fe(II) concentration over the course of this
experiment amended with ascorbic acid. The trend noticed in this experiment is similar to
the trend noticed in the cysteine amended experiment. Samples having ascorbic acid +
disperse red 11 had a higher transformation of Fe(III) while the transformation
difference between the samples with ascorbic acid + quinoline yellow as an electron
shuttle compared to other reductant+ ES amendments was less. This difference is well
explained by the data presented in Figure 3.2 C which clearly depicts the lower shuttling
ability of quinoline yellow. From both the experiments, relatively higher formation of
Fe(II) was seen in amendments with (AQDS; disperse red 11) + reductant than in samples
with the reductant alone indicating that the shuttles increase the extent of transformation
. The amendment with the reductant+quinoline yellow was an exception.
28
Figure 3.2: Fe(II) accumulation over time for amendments using ascorbic acid as
the electron donor and 0.1 mM (A) AQDS & disperse red 11 as electron shuttles
(B) AQDS and quinoline yellow as electron shuttles; C) Concentration of Fe(II)
accumulated for the initial and final time points for amendments with reductants +
ES. Error bars represent standard deviation for triplicate samples.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe
(II)
(m
M)
Time(Hours)
Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid +AQDS
Ascorbic acid + Disperse Red 11 AQDS
Disperse Red 11 Fegel
A
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe
(II)
(m
M)
Time(Hours)
Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid+ AQDS
Ascorbic acid + Quinoline Yellow AQDS
Quinoline Yellow Fegel
B
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Ascorbic acid+ AQDS Ascorbic acid+Disperse Red 11
Ascorbic acid+Quinoline Yellow
Fe
(II)
(m
M)
Initial Time Point
Final Time Point
C
29
3.2.2 Transformation of Fe(III) in Amendments with a Higher Shuttle Concentration
This experiment was conducted using a higher concentration of the electron
shuttles to delineate the difference in extent of transformation due to shuttle
concentrations. A 0.5mM concentration of shuttles was used .The experiments conducted
with cysteine as the electron donor demonstrated a higher concentration of Fe(II)
produced in the all the reductant +ES amendments within the same experimental phase
than the previous experiment(Figure 3.3(A,B)).This indicates the increase in shuttling
ability of the ES with increase in concentration. Amendments containing the electron
shuttles and having ascorbic acid as an electron donor also demonstrated a greater extent
of Fe(III) reduction in the present study compared to what was observed in amendments
with lower shuttle concentration (Figure 3.4(A,B)).
The trend of disperse red 11 having a higher or equivalent transformation ability
to AQDS was prominent in the amendments with both reductants while quinoline yellow
produced less transformation. The overall increase in transformation might be due to the
higher concentration of quinone moieties present in the amendment paving way for a
higher shuttling ability. Figures 3.3C and 3.4C demonstrates the extent of reduction due
to the different shuttles used and the transformation due to the reductant alone. The
amount of Fe(II) produced in case of both reductants + ES amendments indicate disperse
red 11 to be very effective with a high shuttling ability. Figure 3.5(A,B) gives an idea
about the differences in amount of Fe(III) reduced at the initial and at the final time point
due to the different ES concentrations amended. From this figure, it is observed that
administering higher ES concentrations results in greater transformation.
30
Figure 3.3: Fe(II) accumulation over time for amendments using cysteine as the
electron donor and0.5mM (A) AQDS & disperse red 11 as electron shuttles (B)
AQDS and quinoline yellow as electron shuttles; (C) Concentration of Fe(II)
accumulated for the initial and final time points for amendments with reductants +
ES and the reductant alone. Error bars represent standard deviation for triplicate
samples.
0
1
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe
(II)
(m
M)
Time(Hours)
Cysteine Cysteine+ AQDS Cysteine+ Disperse Red 11
AQDS Disperse Red 11 Fegel
A
0
1
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Time(Hours)
Cysteine Cysteine+ AQDS Cysteine+ Quinoline Yellow
AQDS Quinoline Yellow Fegel
B
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Fe
(II)
(m
M)
Initial Time Point
Final Time Point
C
31
Figure 3.4: Fe(II) accumulation over time for amendments using ascorbic acid as
the electron donor and 0.5mM of (A) AQDS & disperse red 11 as electron shuttles
(B) AQDS and quinoline yellow as electron shuttles; C) Concentration of Fe(II)
accumulated for the initial and final time points for amendments with reductants +
ES and the reductant alone. Error bars represent standard deviation for triplicate
samples.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Time(Hours)
Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid+ AQDS
Ascorbic acid+ Disperse Red 11 AQDS
Disperse Red 11 Fegel
A
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Time(Hours)
Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid+ AQDS
Ascorbic acid+ Quinoline Yellow AQDS
Quinoline Yellow Fegel
B
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid+AQDS
Ascorbic acid+Disperse Red 11
Ascorbicacid+Quinoline
Yellow
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Initial time point
Final Time Point
C
32
Figure 3.5: Fe(II) accumulation in amendments with 0.1mM & 0.5mM electron
shuttles at the initial and final hour time points and (A) Cysteine as the reductant
(B) Ascorbic acid as the reductant. Error bars represent standard deviation for
triplicate samples.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Fegel + Cysteine +AQDS
Fegel + Cysteine+Disperse Red 11
Fegel + Cysteine+Quinoline Yellow
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Initial Time Point-0.1mM E.S
Initial Time Point-0.5mM E.S
Final Time Point- 0.1mM E.S
Final Time Point-0.5mM E.S
A
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Fegel + Ascorbicacid+ AQDS
Fegel + Ascorbicacid+ Disperse Red
11
Fegel + Ascorbicacid+ Quinoline
Yellow
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Initial Time Point- 0.1mM E.S
Initial Time Point - 0.5mM E.S
Final Time Point-0.1mM E.S
Final Time Point- 0.5mM E.S
B
33
3.2.3 Effect of pH on Transformation of Fe(III)
The effect of smoke dyes as electron shuttles was studied at a higher pH condition
of 9.5. The pH of the experiment dropped to 9.3 and varied between 9.2-9.3 over the
course of the experiment. Figures 3.6&3.7 (A, B) demonstrate the concentration of Fe(II)
produced over time when cysteine and ascorbic acid were used as electron donors.
Slightly greater magnitude of Fe(III) was transformed at the initial time point compared
to that reduced in the experimental conditions with pH varying from 7.5-8.0. As the
difference in transformation magnitude was less under both conditions, student’s t-test
was performed to test the level of significant difference . There was no significant
difference in Fe(II) concentration at the higher pH based on the student’s t-test (α=0.05).
Highest transformation of Fe(III) was seen in the disperse red 11 + reductant amendments
in case of both electron donors. Figures 3.6 & 3. 7 (C) gives an idea about the relative
concentration of Fe(II) accumulated at the initial and final hour time points outlining the
transformation ability between shuttles. The smoke dye disperse red 11 was observed to
be an effective electron shuttle with a shuttling capacity equivalent or greater than
AQDS. Quinoline yellow exhibited a lesser ability to shuttle under all conditions. This
might be due to structural differences showing a lesser tendency to accept and donate
electrons. pH can be another reason for quinoline yellow to have showed lesser capacity
as the effective pH ranges for shuttles differ and enough data is not available to prove the
same(Fu and Viraraghavan,2003).
Though the extent of shuttling was expected to increase at higher pH levels, the
change observed in the case of this experiment was not significant. The Fe(II)
34
accumulated at the initial and final time points in the amendments at the two pH
conditions are shown in Figure 3.8(A,B). This shows the relative differences in Fe(III)
transformation caused due to varying pH.
35
Figure 3.6: Fe(II) accumulation over time for amendments using cysteine as the
electron donor and0.5mM (A) AQDS & disperse red 11 as electron shuttles at pH
9.2 (B) AQDS and quinoline yellow as electron shuttles at pH 9.2; (C)
Concentration of Fe(II) accumulated at the initial and final time points for
amendments with reductant and ES. Error bars represent standard deviation for
triplicate samples.
0
1
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Time(Hours)
Cysteine Cysteine+ AQDS Cysteine+ Disperse Red 11
AQDS Disperse Red 11 Fegel
A
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Time(Hours)
Cysteine Cysteine+ AQDS Cysteine+ Quinoline Yellow
AQDS Quinoline Yellow Fegel
B
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Cysteine+AQDS Cysteine+Disperse Red11
Cysteine+QuinolineYellow
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Initial Time Point
Final Time Point
C
36
Figure3. 7: Fe(II) accumulation over time for amendments with ascorbic acid as
the electron donor and 0.5 mM (A) AQDS & disperse red 11 as electron shuttles
at pH 9.2 (B) AQDS and quinoline yellow as electron shuttles at pH 9.2; C)
Concentration of Fe(II) accumulated for the initial and final time points for
amendments with reductant and ES. Error bars represent standard deviation for
triplicate samples.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Time(Hours)
Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid+ AQDS Ascorbic acid+ Disperse Red 11 AQDS Disperse Red 11 Fegel
A
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 1 2 3 4 5
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Time(Hours)
Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid+ AQDS
Ascorbic acid+Quinoline Yellow AQDS
Quinoline yellow Fegel
B
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Fegel+Ascorbicacid+AQDS
Fegel+Ascorbicacid+Disperse Red 11
Fegel + Ascorbicacid+Quinoline Yellow
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Initial Time Point
Final Time Point
C
37
Figure 3.8: (A) Fe(II) accumulation in amendments with the electron shuttles at the
initial and final time points and (A) Cysteine as the reductant (B) Ascorbic acid as
the reductant at different pH conditions. Error bars represent standard deviation for
triplicate samples.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Fegel + Cysteine +AQDS
Fegel + Cysteine+Disperse Red 11
Fegel + Cysteine+Quinoline Yellow
Fe
(II)
(m
M)
Initial Time Point -pH 7.5
Initial Time Point-pH 9.2
Final Time Point-pH7.5
Final Time Point-pH9.2
A
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Fegel + Ascorbic acid+ AQDS
Fegel + Ascorbicacid+ Disperse Red
11
Fegel + Ascorbicacid+ Quinoline
Yellow
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Initial Time Point-pH 7.5
Initial Time Point-pH 9.2
Final Time Point -pH 7.5
Final Time Point-pH 9.2
B
38
3.3 Conclusion
The trend demonstrated by the data clearly indicates that the smoke dyes shuttle
electrons between the donor (Reductant) and poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxide. A
considerably higher concentration of Fe(II) is produced with higher concentration of
electron shuttles. A higher alkaline pH did not produce a significant increase in the extent
of transformation of Fe(III). Though the extent of shuttling was expected to increase at
higher pH levels, the change observed in the case of this experiment was not significant
but there was a minor increase in the mean concentration values. Better shuttling
capability is expected as the compounds become deprotonated at higher pH conditions
and hence become more reactive. Enough information to explain the effect of pH and the
shuttling ability of these compounds was not available as their pKa values could not be
determined. The two smoke dyes tested, exhibit a good electron shuttling capacity with
disperse red 11 having a greater capacity. Thus, these military dyes can be a good option
for large scale applications in remediation strategies carried out under iron reducing
conditions.
39
CHAPTER 4
ABIOTIC TRANSFORMATION OF HEXAHYDRO-1,3,5,-TRINITRO-1,3,5
TRIAZINE IN THE PRESENCE OF ELECTRON SHUTTLING COMPOUNDS
Royal demolition explosive (RDX) also referred to as Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-
1,3,5 Triazine is a class C carcinogen. RDX provides a major challenge for cleanup
mechanisms at munitions manufacturing units due to its resistance to (bio)degradation,
low capacity to volatilize and its tendency to be transported from the source of
contamination within aquifers (Byung et al., 2001). Though there are many ex-situ
treatments for transforming RDX, most of these strategies result in displacing the RDX
contamination from one zone to another with accumulation of daughter products with
equivalent or greater toxicity and have low economic feasibility. Alternatively, in-situ
technologies are more cost effective.
Biotic as well as abiotic mechanisms viable for the degradation process can be
easily exploited in in-situ treatment methods (Byung et al., 2001). Transformation
involving biotic mechanisms is supported by microbially mediated processes. Abiotic
mechanisms involve reducing agents either naturally present in the subsurface or by the
construction of permeable reactive barriers.
In-situ anaerobic strategies employing biotic methods involve the reduction of the
nitro functional groups in the cyclic structure by native microbial population to produce
nitroso metabolites. Biotic strategies can be adopted only when specific microbial
population are present which bring about the transformation of RDX. When the microbial
40
population responsible for transformation is not widespread, the reactions are slow and
do not go to completion, hindering the yield of the final metabolite. Employing electron
mediators might be a viable option to increase the reaction rate. Electron shuttling
involves the transformation of the shuttles into its reduced form which in turn brings
about the degradation of the contaminant. As the electron shuttles have the capacity to
cycle between their oxidized and reduced states, applying even small concentrations of
the shuttle might bring large magnitudes of transformation. This shuttling mechanism
also eliminates the need for the cell to come into direct contact with the contaminant
molecule and other solid phase minerals which often act as intermediate donors in the
reduction pathway (Lovely et al., 1996).
Utilizing the electron shuttling mechanism for RDX transformation might be a
viable option. Electron shuttles used can mediate the transfer of electrons either between
the cells and the contaminant or between the cells and the solid mineral surfaces present
in the contaminated subsurface which in turn serves as an electron donor to the
contaminant molecule. This opens up two different pathways for the transformation to
occur (Kwon and Finneran, 2006;Kwon and Finneran, 2008).
Remediation strategies that stimulate Fe(III) reducing organisms via extracellular
electron transfer is a good option as the mechanism does not depend upon organisms
which transfer electrons directly to RDX (Lovely and Philips, 1986;Kwon and Finneran,
2009). The rates of transformation differ appreciably in environments supported by
electron shuttle mediation and the concentration of various Fe(III) forms present.
41
The functional groups present in these shuttling compounds influence their
effectiveness as an electron shuttle. Compounds containing thiol and quinone groups
have been known to be effective electron shuttles. Among the compounds having
quinone groups, AQDS has been found to be very effective as a shuttle but usage of
AQDS for field applications will not be cost effective (Kwon, 2009). The need for
exploring other compounds for their shuttling capacity arises if these compounds have to
be applied for in-situ remediation methods. Previous data suggested that humics extract
and Red 9 can promote nitro group reduction by acting as an electron acceptor in
microbial respiration and in turn transfer electrons to the nitramine compounds (Kwon
and Finneran, 2006;Kwon and Finneran, 2008). Reduced humics extract and Red 9
showed electron donating capacity but the capacity for the latter compound was relatively
less. Fe(III) and nitrate were observed to be better electron acceptors than RDX in the
study conducted with the reduced shuttles.
In abiotic experiments conducted with reduced Red 9, no transformation occurred
and this was attirubuted to kinetic limitations in the system(Kwon, 2009). Biotic
experiments demonstrated red 9 to be an effective electron shuttle and the rate was found
to be more pronounced in experimental systems having poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxides.
This is likely due to the transformation occurring because of the reactive Fe(II) formed by
the microbially reduced shuttles and by direct electron transfer to RDX from the
microbially reduced shuttles (Kwon and Finneran, 2008). This data suggests that smoke
dyes containing quinone groups could be a viable alternative for the other shuttles
42
exhibiting good electron shuttling capacity. This formed a good basis for the experiments
conducted in this study.
The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two smoke
dyes- disperse red 11 and quinoline yellow as electron shuttling compounds. Experiments
were conducted to observe the effectiveness of the direct electron transfer pathway which
involves the transformation of RDX by abiotically reduced electron shuttles. The
objective was to determine whether the smoke dyes have the capacity to transfer
electrons directly to RDX and will promote the degradation of RDX by the direct
transformation pathway.
4.1 Materials and Methods
All materials obtained were of analytical grade and commercially obtained from
authentic sources. The smoke dye disperse red 11 and stock solution of RDX in
acetonitrile was purchased from U.S Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering
Research Laboratory (CERL). Quinoline yellow was obtained from Sigma Aldrich.
Cysteine ≥ 97% purity, ascorbic acid ≥ 99% purity, ferric chloride and anthraquinone-
2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich.
4.1.1 Preparation of Stock Solutions
AQDS and quinoline yellow stock solutions were prepared in distilled water by
measuring out the required weight of the chemicals to obtain the stock solution of
appropriate concentration. Disperse red 11 stock solution was prepared by dissolving
disperse red 11 in ethanol. Ethanol was used as a solvent for disperse red 11 as it yields
43
the highest magnitude of solubility only in alcohols. The stock solutions were degassed
with nitrogen for a time span of 30 minutes for the liquid medium and 7 minutes for the
head space. The degassing was done so as to maintain the anoxic conditions. The AQDS
and quinoline yellow stock solutions were sterilized by autoclaving for a time period of
20 minutes at a temperature of 121◦C.
RDX stock solution was prepared by taking 0.2ml of the concentrated RDX stock
(obtained from CERL) in acetonitrile and gas dried so as to vaporize the acetonitrile. The
solid residue obtained was dissolved in distilled water and stirred for four hours at a
temperature of 30◦C. This temperature was maintained so as to increase the solubility of
RDX in water.
4.1.2 Experimental Sample Design
The experimental tubes were prepared by sparging the tubes with N2 & CO2 in the
ratio of 95:5 for experiments conducted at a lower pH and with 100% nitrogen for
experiments conducted at a higher alkaline pH. For maintaining the pH at around 7.5, 30
mM bicarbonate/5% CO2 system was used. For higher alkaline pH conditions (around
9.5), 30 mM bicarbonate/5mM Carbonate system was used. The experimental tubes were
prepared in triplicates and contained a total sample volume of 10 ml. In order to maintain
anoxic conditions, the tubes were sealed with thick butyl rubber stoppers and crimped
with aluminum caps after degassing. RDX, electron shuttles and the reductants were
injected using anaerobic syringes and needles from the concentrated, anaerobic stock
44
solutions. Twelve different amendments used for both the experiments conducted at the
two pH conditions are specified below:
Table 4.1: Treatment Description for RDX Transformation Experiment
1 40μM RDX+240 μM Cysteine+500 μM AQDS
2 40 μM RDX + 240μM Cysteine+500 μM Disperse Red 11
3 40μM RDX+240μM Cysteine+500μM Quinoline Yellow
4 40μM RDX+120 μM Ascorbic acid+500 μM AQDS
5 40 μM RDX + 120μM Ascorbic acid+500 μM Disperse Red 11
6 40μM RDX+120μM Ascorbic acid+500μM Quinoline Yellow
7 40μM RDX+240μM Cysteine
8 40μM RDX+120μM Ascorbic acid
9 40μM RDX +500 μM AQDS
10 40μM RDX +500 μM Disperse Red 11
11 40μM RDX +500 μM Quinoline Yellow
12 40μM RDX
4.1.3 Analytical Methods
Samples were withdrawn and sacrificed for analysis at the 0th
, 2nd
, 4th
, 6th
, 8th
and
the 24th
hour time points. The last sample was withdrawn after thirty and nine days for
the amendments at the lower and higher alkaline pH conditions respectively. Aliquots of
sample withdrawn from the experimental tubes amended with the reductants, ES and
RDX were filtered using 0.2μM PTFE filters so as to remove any un-dissolved solid
particles of the smoke dyes getting into the HPLC sample vials during analysis.
Concentrations of RDX was measured using high performance liquid
chromatography(HPLC) with UV detection(Dionex) at a wavelength of 254nm coupled
45
with Supelcosil LC-CN column(Supelco 4.6 x 25mm x 5μm)with a guard column and an
isocratic mobile phase(50% water,50%methanol,1.0ml/min).
The RDX transformation experiment was conducted at two different pH
conditions. A higher shuttle concentration was employed for these experiments as they
were found to work better for the iron transformation studies. Stoichiometric
concentrations of the reductants were used for the experiments according to the following
reactions:
C3H6N6O6+6H++6e
- C3H6N6O3(TNX)+3H2O (Red. half reaction) (7)
2C3H7NO2S C6H12N2O4S2+2H++2e
-(Ox. half reaction of Cysteine) (8)
C3H6N6O6+6C3H7NO2S C3H6N6O3(TNX)+3H2O+3 C6H12N2O4S2(Full reaction) (9)
C6H8O6 C6H6O6+2H++2e
-(Ox.half reaction of Ascorbic acid) (10)
C3H6N6O6+ 3C6H8O6 C3H6N6O3(TNX)+3H2O+ 3C6H6O6(Full reaction) (11)
Hence 6 times the concentration of Cysteine and 3 times the concentration of Ascorbic
acid are required to completely reduce RDX to TNX (Hexahydro -1,3,5-Trinitroso-1,3,5-
Triazine). A stoichiometric concentration of 240μM of Cysteine and 120μM ascorbic
acid was used for this experiment to ensure the concentrations did not become the rate
limiting factor. The experiments were initiated by injecting the reductants into the
samples amended with RDX and the electron shuttles.
46
4.2 Results and Discussion
4.2.1 Transformation Experiment at Lower Alkaline pH Conditions
The transformation of RDX when observed under lower pH conditions (around
7.5-8) was less for all the ES (Electron shuttle) + reductant amendments except for the
amendment containing AQDS. The RDX in the amendment with Cysteine + AQDS
decreased to a concentration of 12.14 μM from an initial concentration of 42.22 μM in a
thirty day time frame (Figure 4.1A). In case of ascorbic acid, the final value was
determined to be 29.09 μM from an initial concentration value of 37.21 μM which was
much lesser when compared to Cysteine amendment with AQDS (Figure 4.1 B).
The other amendments having the reductants + ES and the reductant only
amendment depicted a decrease in RDX concentration over the thirty day time frame but
the reduction was less and could not be proved to be occurring as a result of RDX
transformation (Figure 4.1(A,B)). The controls containing only RDX and RDX+ ES did
not show any considerable transformation except for minor inconsistency in values which
might be due to analytical issues due to carryover of the analyte.
47
Figure4.1: (A) Reduction of RDX in cysteine + electron shuttle amendments at a
lower alkaline pH (B) Reduction of RDX in ascorbic acid+ electron shuttle
amendments at a lower alkaline pH. Error bars represent standard deviation for
triplicate samples.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70R
DX
(μ
M)
Initial Time Point
2 Hours
4 Hours
6 Hours
8 Hours
24 Hours
30 Days
A
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
RD
X (μ
M)
Initial Time Point
2 Hours
4 Hours
6 Hours
8 Hours
24 Hours
30 Days
B
48
4.2.2 Transformation Experiment at Higher Alkaline pH Conditions
This experiment was imitated at a higher alkaline pH of around 9.5 to determine
whether higher pH conditions will increase the electron donating capacity of the electron
shuttles used. The pH varied between 9.2-9.3 during the experiment. The experimental
design was the same with only changes in pH conditions.Significant reduction of RDX
was seen only in amendments with the reductants and AQDS as electron shuttles. In the
amendment with Cysteine about 36.79 μM concentration of RDX was reduced to 1.60
μM in nine days (Figure 4.2 A). There was observed to be a significant reduction in
concentration by the end of the eighth hour in these amendments. The same trend was
observed in amendments containing AQDS and ascorbic acid as well. About 38.85 μM
RDX was reduced to 10.68 μM in nine days (Figure 4.2 B).The reduction was observed
to be evident within a period of six hours in these samples.
The rate of reduction in the AQDS + reductant amendments was found to be
higher than the previous experiment conducted at a lower alkaline pH. This might be due
to the fact that electron shuttles have a greater shuttling capacity at an alkaline pH
(Uchimiya and Stone, 2006) .The other amendments containing the reductants + smoke
dyes as shuttles recorded no significant decrease in the concentration of RDX (Figure 4.2
A,B). This might denote the inability of the smoke dyes to donate electrons directly to
RDX. The control samples exhibited no activity except for the initial inconsistency in the
RDX+AQDS control. This could have been due to the detection issues in the UV detector
which might have resulted in lower detection of initial concentrations.
49
The wide time variation in the final sampling periods for both the experiments
was due to the analytical issues associated with the column. A couple of analysis aspects
had to be taken care of before the column could be used for continuing the analysis
during the experimental run at lower alkaline pH. From both the experiments, it was
observed that the smoke dyes exhibited limited electron shuttling capacity and were not
able to transfer electrons directly to RDX to a large extent to bring about significant
transformation. No nitroso metabolites were detected as there was transformation only in
the amendments with the reductant and AQDS. In case of AQDS mediated
transformation of RDX, the prime metabolite formed is formaldehyde which was not
quantified by the HPLC analysis. The model electron shuttle, AQDS could reduce RDX
to a large extent. Further experimentation will be required to test the effectiveness of
these smoke dyes as electron shuttles for direct RDX transformation.
50
Figure 4.2: (A) Reduction of RDX in cysteine + electron shuttle amendments at a
higher alkaline pH (B) Reduction of RDX in ascorbic acid + electron shuttle
amendments at higher alkaline pH. Error bars represent standard deviation for
triplicate samples.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60R
DX
(μ
M)
Initial Time Point
2 Hours
4 Hours
6 Hours
8 Hours
24 Hours
9 Days
A
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
RD
X (μ
M)
Initial Time Point
2 Hours
4 Hours
6 Hours
8 Hours
24 Hours
9 Days
B
51
4.3 Conclusion
The experimental results obtained clearly indicate that the electron shuttling
capacity of the smoke dyes in reducing RDX directly is limited. Both the smoke dyes
brought negligible or no transformation in the amendments tested. However, the reaction
pathway in this system can be modified by using a metal mediator. This will pave way
for bringing about the transformation of RDX by an indirect mechanism. If iron reducing
conditions are considered for the indirect mechanism, the reduced shuttles will transfer
electrons to the iron form present which in turn will produce reactive Fe(II). The reactive
Fe(II) might act as effective electron donors to reduce RDX. From the previous
experiments involving iron transformation, the electron shuttles have demonstrated to be
effective under iron reducing conditions. This mechanism can be exploited to bring the
transformation of RDX using these shuttles.
52
CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Smoke dyes as electron shuttling compounds increased the extent of poorly
crystalline Fe(III) oxide transformation. The iron transformation study also demonstrated
that increasing the concentration of the shuttles accelerated the rate at which the iron was
transformed within the same time period. This might be due to the fact that more number
of quinone moieties were present to reduce the Fe(III) present. Increasing the pH
condition did not significantly increase the extent of Fe(III) transformation though there
was observed to be an increase in mean concentration values indicating that the pH
maintained might have been lesser than the pKa value of the compound and increasing
the pH value further up can bring higher extent of transformation.
Under all the conditions tested for Iron transformation using the electron shuttles,
disperse red 11 showed an equivalent or higher capacity compared to AQDS to shuttle
electrons. The magnitude of Fe(II) accumulation was found to be the highest in the
amendments containing the reductants and disperse red 11. Quinoline yellow
demonstrated a lower capacity to shuttle electrons compared to the other electron shuttles
under all conditions. The addition of smoke dyes as electron shuttles was found to
increase the transformation of Fe(III) more than using the electron donor alone. As iron
reducing organisms are widespread in most of the subsurface zones, electron shuttles
effective for increasing Fe(III) reduction rates will be a good option for decontamination
strategies. Moreover, the smoke dyes tested might already be present in contaminated
areas near army zones and hence no external addition of the dyes might be required for
53
executing this strategy. This will make this strategy very economical as no additional cost
of adding electron shuttles is involved.
In the experiments carried out with RDX as the electron acceptor, the smoke dyes
did not exhibit the capacity to transfer electrons directly to RDX. No significant reduction
was seen in the samples amended with the reductants and smoke dyes. An appreciable
decrease in RDX concentration was seen only in the amendments containing the
reductants and AQDS as an electron shuttle. This signifies that the smoke dyes are not as
effective as AQDS in transferring and bringing the direct transformation of RDX.
Though they exhibit a low capacity to donate electrons directly to RDX, it does not
eliminate the option of exploiting smoke dyes to bring about RDX transformation. Metal
mediated degradation pathways might be implemented for degrading RDX using Fe(III)
forms that are already present in the subsurface as the mediators.
The data from this study clearly shows the capacity of the smoke dyes to
transform Fe(III). This pathway can be exploited to form reactive Fe(II) which in turn can
donate electrons to reduce RDX. Previous studies done have shown the metal mediation
pathway to be effective for transforming RDX(Kwon and Finneran, 2006). A
combination of reactions involving biotic and abiotic degradation mechanisms involving
iron reducing conditions, electron shuttles and reactive Fe(II) formed can be employed
for degrading RDX by an indirect mechanism using Fe(III) as the intermediate electron
acceptor(Kwon and Finneran, 2006). The smoke dyes considered here may be suitable
for field applications and might be appropriate for remediation strategies using flow
54
controlled pumping systems to supply donor and the shuttle in the zone of contamination.
Morover, these smoke dyes might already be present in the military zones which might
provide an extra advantage of implementing this strategy with no external ES addition.
The two main aspects which has to be explored further is the effectiveness of these
shuttles in metal mediated mechanisms and the tolerance of the microbial community to
use these shuttle as electron acceptors. If these shuttles pose no potential toxicity effects
to the microbes, they will act as a suitable alternative for increasing the rate of
contaminant transformation in (Bio) remediation strategies.
Though this research provides a good idea about the shuttling ability of the
electron shuttles for bringing about RDX and Fe(III) transformation, some
recommendations for future work include:
- The evaluation of the transformation of RDX by an indirect metal mediated
pathway involving Fe(III) as the mediator in the presence of electron shuttles.
- Study which involves the testing of the same strategy including both direct and
indirect transformation of RDX by the electron shuttles in a biotic mechanism
where cells are employed as electron donors instead of the reductants.
55
APPENDIX
Biotic iron transformation using a) 2.5 μM concentration of AQDS & disperse
red 11 as electron shuttles b) 100 μM concentration of AQDS & disperse red 11
as electron shuttles
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
0 10 20 30 40 50
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Time(hrs)
Cells+AQDS+Fegel+Acetate
Cells +Fegel+DisperseRed11+Acetate
Celles+Fegel+Disperse Red11-Acetate
Cells+Fegel+Electron donor
Cells+Fegel
Acetate+Fegel
Disperse Red 11+ Fegel
A
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
0 10 20 30 40 50
Fe(I
I) (
mM
)
Time(hrs)
Cells+AQDS+Fegel+Acetate
Cells +Fegel+DisperseRed11+Acetate
Celles+Fegel+Disperse Red11-Acetate
Cells+Fegel+Electron donor
Cells+Fegel
Acetate+Fegel
Disperse Red 11+ FegelB
56
REFERENCES
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (1995). Toxicological profile
forRDX. Atlanta, GA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public
Health Service
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2010). Toxicological profile
forRDX. Atlanta, GA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public
Health Service
Adrian, N.R, C.M Arnett, and R.F Hickey. 2003. "Stimulating the Anaerobic
Biodegradation of Explosives by the Addition of Hydrogen Or Electron Donors that
Produce Hydrogen." Water Research 37 (14): 3499-3507.hope
Anderson, R. T., and D. R. Lovley. 1999. "Naphthalene and Benzene Degradation Under
Fe(III)-Reducing Conditions in Petroleum-Contaminated
Aquifers." Bioremediation . 3 (121–135).
Binks, P.R, S. Nicklin, and N.C Bruce. 1995. "Degradation of Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-
1,3,5-Triazine (RDX) by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pb1." Applied and
Environmental Microbiology 61 (4): 1318-1322.
Boopathy, R. 2001. "Enhanced Biodegradation of Cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine
(HMX) Under Mixed Electron-Acceptor Condition." Bioresource Technology 76
(3): 241-244.
Boopathy, R., J. Manning, and C.F Kulpa. 1998. "Biotransformation of Explosives by
Anaerobic Consortia in Liquid Culture and in Soil Slurry." International
Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 41 (1): 67-74.
Bradley, P. M. and R. S. Dinicola. 2005. "RDX (Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-
Triazine) Biodegradation in Aquifer Sediments Under Manganese-Reducing
Conditions." Bioremediation 9 (1): 1.
Byung, T, J. Craigl, and A. Andpedroj . 2001. "Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine
Mineralization by Zerovalent Iron and Mixed Anaerobic Cultures." Environmental
Science & Technology 35 (21): 4341-4346.
Cervantes, F. J., J. E. Enriquez, M. R. Mendoza-Hernandez, E. Razo-Flores, and J. A.
Field. 2006. "The Role of Sulphate Reduction on the Reductive Decolorization of the
Azo Dye Reactive Orange 14." Water Science and Technology 54 (2): 171-177.
57
Cervantes, F.J, L. Vu-Thi-Thu, G. Lettinga, and J.A Field. 2004. "Quinone-Respiration
Improves Dechlorination of Carbon Tetrachloride by Anaerobic Sludge." Applied
Microbiology and Biotechnology 64 (5): 702-711.
Coleman, N.V, D.R Nelson, and T. Duxbury. 1998. "Aerobic Biodegradation of
Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine (RDX) as a Nitrogen Source by a
Rhodococcus Sp., Strain DN22." Soil Biology & Biochemistry 30 (8-9): 1159-1167.
Coleman, N.V, J.C Spain, and T. Duxbury. 2002. "Evidence that RDX Biodegradation by
Rhodococcus Strain DN22 is Plasmid-Borne and Involves a Cytochrome p-
450." Journal of Applied Microbiology 93 (3): 463-472.
Curtis G.P, M. Reinhard 1994. "Reductive Dehalogenation of Hexachloroethane, Carbon
tetrachloride, and Bromoform by Anthraquinone Disulfonate and Humic
Acid." Environmental Science & Technology 28 (2393–401).
Dror, I. and M.A Schlautman. 2004. "Cosolvent Effect on the Catalytic Reductive
Dechlorination of PCE." Chemosphere 57 (10): 1505-1514.
Freedman, D.L and K.W Sutherland. 1998. "Biodegradation of Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-
1,3,5-Triazine (RDX) Under Nitrate-Reducing Conditions." Water Science and
Technology 38 (7): 33-40.
Fu, Y.Z and T. Viraraghavan. 2003. "Column Studies for Biosorption of Dyes from
Aqueous Solutions on Immobilised Aspergillus Niger Fungal Biomass." Water
SA 29 (4): 465-472.
Hawari, J., S. Beaudet, A. Halasz, S. Thiboutot, and G. Ampleman. 2000. "Microbial
Degradation of Explosives: Biotransformation Versus Mineralization." Applied
Microbiology and Biotechnology 54 (5): 605-618.
Hawari, J., A. Halasz, T. Sheremata, S. Beaudet, C. Groom, L. Paquet, C. Rhofir, G.
Ampleman, and S. Thiboutot. 2000. "Characterization of Metabolites during
Biodegradation of Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine (RDX) with Municipal
Anaerobic Sludge." Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66 (6): 2652-2657.
Eaton, H.L. 1990. "Anaerobic Degradation of RDX by Ovine Ruminal Microbes."
Doctorate of Philosophy, Oregon State University.
Keum, Y.S and Q.X Li. 2004. "Reduction of Nitroaromatic Pesticides with Zero-Valent
Iron." Chemosphere 54 (3): 255-263.
58
Kim, Dongwook and T. J. Strathmann. 2007. "Role of Organically Complexed Iron(II)
Species in the Reductive Transformation of RDX in Anoxic
Environments." Environmental Science & Technology 41 (4): 1257-1264.
Kwon, M. J and K. T. Finneran. 2006. "Microbially Mediated Biodegradation of
Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine by Extracellular Electron Shuttling
Compounds." Applied and Environmental Microbiology72 (9): 5933-5941.
Kwon, M. J. and K. T. Finneran. 2008. "Biotransformation Products and Mineralization
Potential for Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine (RDX) in Abiotic Versus
Biological Degradation Pathways with Anthraquinone-2,6-Disulfonate (AQDS) and
Geobacter metallireducens." Biodegradation 19 (5): 705-715.
Lovley D.R, J.D Coates , E.L.Blunt-Harris , E.J.P Phillips , Woodward J.C. 1996.
"Humic Substances as Electron Acceptors for Microbial Respiration." Nature 382
(445–8).
Lovley, D.R. 1995. "Bioremediation of Organic and Metal Contaminants with
Dissimilatory Metal Reduction." Journal of Industrial Microbiology 14 (2): 85-93.
Lovley, D.R, J.L. Fraga, E.L. Blunt-Harris, L.A. Hayes, E.J.P. Phillips, and J.D. Coates.
1998. "Humic Substances as a Mediator for Microbially Catalyzed Metal
Reduction." Acta Hydrochimica Et Hydrobiologica 26 (3): 152-157.
Lovley, D.R and EJP Phillips. 1986. "Organic-Matter Mineralization with Reduction of
Ferric Iron in Anaerobic Sediments." Applied and Environmental Microbiology 51
(4): 683-689.
Lovley, D.R, J.C. Woodward, and F.H. Chapelle. 1996. "Rapid Anaerobic Benzene
Oxidation with a Variety of Chelated Fe(III) Forms." Applied and Environmental
Microbiology 62 (1): 288-291.
Kwon, M. J. 2009. "Extracellular Electron Shuttle Mediated Biodegradation of
Hexahydro 1,3,5 Trinitro 1,3,5 Triazine." Doctor of Philosophy, University of
Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
McLellan, W. L., Hartley, W. R., and M.E.Brower. 1988. "Health Advisory for
Octahydro-1,3,5,7-Tetranitro-1,3,5,7-Tetrazocine (HMX)."US Army Medical
Research and Development Command, Fort Detrick, MD.
McLellan, W. L., Hartley, W. R., and Brower, M. E. 1988. "Health Advisory for
Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine (RDX)."US Army Medical Research and
Development Command, Fort Detrick, MD.
59
Pennington, J.C and J.M Brannon. 2002. "Environmental Fate of
Explosives." Thermochimica Acta 384 (1-2): 163-172.
Robert E. Card, Jr. and Robin L. Autenrieth. 1998. "Treatment of HMX and RDX
Contamination.” Amarillo National Resource Center for Plutonium.
Rodgers, J.D and N.J. Bunce. 2001. "Treatment Methods for the Remediation of
Nitroaromatic Explosives." Water Research 35 (9): 2101-2111.
Ryon, M. G., B. C. Pal, S. S. Talmage, and R. H. Ross. 1984. "Database Assessment of
the Health and Environmental Effects of Munitions Production Waste Products.".
Schwarzenbach, R.P, R. Stierli, K. Lanz, and J. Zeyer. 1990. "Quinone and Iron
Porphyrin Mediated Reduction of Nitroaromatic Compounds in Homogeneous
Aqueous-Solution." Environmental Science & Technology 24 (10): 1566-1574.
Stookey, L.L. 1970. "Ferrozine - a New Spectrophotometric Reagent for Iron." Analytical
Chemistry 42 (7): 779.
Uchimiya, M. and A. T. Stone. 2006. "Redox Reactions between Iron and Quinones:
Thermodynamic Constraints." Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70 (6).
Van der Zee, F.P, R.H.M Bouwman, D.P.B.T.B Strik, G. Lettinga, and J.A Field. 2001.
"Application of Redox Mediators to Accelerate the Transformation of Reactive Azo
Dyes in Anaerobic Bioreactors." Biotechnology and Bioengineering 75 (6): 691-701.
Van der Zee, R.Frank and F. J. Cervantes. 2009. "Impact and Application of Electron
Shuttles on the Redox (Bio)Transformation of Contaminants: A
Review." Biotechnology Advances 27 (3): 256-277.
Recommended