View
225
Download
6
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
National Land Records Modernization Programme(NLRMP)-2008
The Cabinet has approved the proposal of the Department of Land Resources
, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India to merge the two existing
Centrally-sponsored schemes of Computerization of Land Records (CLR) and
Strengthening of Revenue Administration & Updating of Land Records (SRA&ULR)
and to replace them with a modified Centrally-sponsored scheme in the shape of the
National Land Records Modernization Programme (NLRMP), with the ultimate goal
of ushering in the system of conclusive titles with title guarantee in the country.
Current status of land records management in India
2. Land is a State subject in the Constitution, and the systems of land records
management vary from State to State, often even within a State, depending upon
their historical evolution and local traditions. Although these systems are diverse in
form, they have an underlying unity of themes and objectives – and they also suffer
from a largely common set of problems.
2.1 Several departments are involved in managing land records in most of the
States, and the citizen has to approach 3 to 4, or even more, agencies for complete
land records, e.g., Revenue Department for textual records and mutations; Survey &
Settlement (or Consolidation) Department for the maps; Registration Department for
verification of encumbrances and registration of transfer, mortgage, etc.; the
Panchayats (in some States, for mutation), and the municipal authorities (for urban
land records), leading to waste of time, exposure to rent seeking, and harassment.
2.2 These departments work in a somewhat stand-alone manner, and updating of
records by any one of them makes the records of the others outdated. Thus, the
records are almost always outdated and don’t reflect the ground reality. Also, there is
no integration of textual and spatial records, making it difficult to give maps-to-scale
with the records of rights (RoRs).
2.3 The most important activity for updating the records, i.e., survey has been
neglected by most of the States. Original survey for cadastral mapping has not taken
place in many parts of the country. Also, the earlier technology of lattha and chains
for survey is cumbersome, painfully time-taking and costly, and there is need for
adopting modern technology across the country.
2.4 Further, the Registration Act, 1908 provides for registration of deeds and
documents, not titles. Merely the transaction is recorded, and the transfer of
ownership title remains presumptive only. Also, there is significant time lag between
registration and mutation, giving rise to scope of fraudulent transactions in land,
disputes, etc.
International experiences: The system of conclusive titles
3. Problems in land records management have been faced in other countries also,
but respite has come through introducing the system of conclusive titles, also
popularly known as the Torrens system. Australia, New Zealand, the UK,
Switzerland, Canada, the USA, Singapore, and also developing countries such as
Kenya, Malaysia, etc. have successfully introduced this system.
3.1 Kenya is a case in point. The British applied the Indian Registration Act, 1908 as
it was, to Kenya. But, after its Independence, Kenya amended the Act and
introduced the Torrens system.
3.2 Puducherry is an example of the system of conclusive titles from within India
itself. The French introduced the Torrens system there. However, after
Independence, Pondicherry had to regress from conclusive titles to the presumptive
titles system prevalent in India due to the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908.
3.3 The system of conclusive titles is based on 4 basic principles: (i) a single agency
to handle land records (including the maintenance and updating of the textual
records, maps, survey and settlement operations, registration of immovable property
mutations, etc.); (ii) the “mirror” principle, which states that, at any given moment, the
land records mirror the ground reality; (iii) the “curtain” principle, which refers to the
fact that the record of title is a true depiction of the ownership status, mutation is
automatic following registration, there is no need of probing into past title
transactions, and title is a conclusive proof of ownership; and (iv) title insurance,
which refers to the fact that the title is guaranteed for its correctness and the party
concerned is indemnified against any loss arising because of inaccuracy in this
regard. At the moment, land records in India don’t reflect any of these principles. Earlier initiatives of the Department of Land Resources (DoLR) for modernization of land records in India
4. Following a decision in the Conference of the State Revenue Ministers in 1985,
the Government of India had initiated two Centrally-sponsored schemes
– Strengthening of Revenue Administration & Updating of Land Records (SRA&ULR)
and Computerization of Land Records (CLR).
Strengthening of Revenue Administration & Updating of Land Records (SRA&ULR)
4.1 The scheme of SRA&ULR was launched in 1987-88 to help the States and UTs
in updating and maintaining the land records, setting up and strengthening of the
survey and settlement organizations and the survey training infrastructure,
modernization of the survey & settlement operations, and strengthening of the
revenue machinery.
4.2 Funding under the SRA&ULR scheme has been on 50:50 cost-sharing basis
between the Centre and the States. The UTs are provided 100% Central assistance.
The list of items covered under the scheme of SRA&ULR is at Annexure I. The
financial and physical progresses under the scheme are indicated at Annexure II & III
respectively.
Computerization of Land Records (CLR)
4.3 The CLR scheme was launched in 1988-89 with pilot projects in 8 districts and
was subsequently extended to cover the rest of the country. The main objective of
the scheme was to ensure that the landowners get computerized copies of the RoRs
on demand. Under this scheme, 100% financial assistance has been provided to the
States and UTs. A list of activities covered under the CLR scheme is at Annexure IV.
The financial and physical progresses under this scheme are indicated at Annexure
V and VI respectively. The status of computerization of land records in the States
and UTs, as assessed through a detailed sizing exercise, is given in a statement at
Annexure
VII.
Disadvantages of the existing schemes and the need for modifying them
4.5 The activities included in the schemes of CLR and SRA&ULR were basically
meant for strengthening of revenue administration, but also included activities that
contribute to conclusive titling. The choice of activities was left to the States and UTs,
most of whom chose activities that strengthen revenue administration but not
necessarily helped in moving towards conclusive titling. For example, in many years,
as much as 90% of the funds released to the States/UTs under the SRA&ULR
scheme were utilized for construction activities, while non-updated records were
being computerized and scanned under the CLR. Also, this “hamper-of-activities”
approach led to eddying; each activity was a goal in itself rather than a step in the
systematic, ladder-like approach towards reaching the stage of conclusive titling.
4.6 The way the schemes were framed, no timeframe for achieving the goal of
conclusive titles can be set. Technology options for survey were not indicated and
the work remained neglected in most of the States. Neither was the system of
monitoring emphatically spelt out, nor was the exit mode defined in either of the
existing schemes. Further, both the schemes of CLR and SRA&ULR excluded
interconnectivity, geographic information system (GIS) mapping, connectivity with
banks and treasuries, and Registration – the last of which is a vital link in updating
the land records.
Further initiatives
5. The National Common Minimum Programme (NCMP) envisages that “Revenue
administration will be thoroughly modernized and clear land titles will be established”.
Following up on this mandate, an earlier version of the present scheme was
developed by the DoLR under the name “Comprehensive Modernization of Land
Records” (CMLR).
5.1 A Committee under the Secretary, RD was constituted to consider the modern
survey technology options and their cost and time estimates. After a series of
meetings with the technical agencies including the National Remote Sensing Agency
(NRSA), National Informatics Centre (NIC), Survey of India, and a number of States,
the Committee narrowed down the options to the following three, but left the choice
to the States:
a) Pure ground method using electronic total station
(ETS) and global positioning system (GPS); b)
Hybrid method using aerial photography and
ground truthing by ETS and GPS; and c) High-
resolution satellite imagery (HRSI) and ground
truthing by ETS
and GPS. The unit costs for the first two options are the same, but the hybrid
methodology is preferable because it saves time significantly. The HRSI option may
not be suitable for original cadastral surveys because of its wider margin of error.
5.2 Most significantly, a decision was taken to make “conclusive titling” as per the
Torrens system as the ultimate goal of the scheme. The technologies, costs and time
estimates of the components of the scheme were finalized, based on field
experiences of the States and technical agencies. The need was felt for a
comprehensive modernization scheme integrating Land Records and Registration.
Accordingly, the CMLR proposal was further enhanced in the shape of the National
Land Records Modernization Programme (NLRMP).
Components and activities under the NLRMP.
6. The following is an outline of the components and activities to be taken up under
the NLRMP:
I. Computerization of land records a) Data entry/re-entry/data conversion of
all textual records
including mutation records and other land attributes data b) Digitization
of cadastral maps c) Integration of textual and spatial data d) Tehsil, sub-
division/district data centers e) State-level data centres f) Inter-connectivity
among revenue offices
II. Survey/resurvey and updating of the survey & settlement records (including
ground control network and ground truthing) using the following modern
technology options:
a) Pure ground method using electronic total station (ETS)
and global positioning system (GPS); or b) Hybrid
methodology using aerial photography and ground
truthing by ETS and GPS; or c) High Resolution
Satellite Imagery (HRSI) and ground truthing by ETS
and GPS.
III. Computerization of Registration a) Computerization of the sub-registrar’s
offices (SROs) b) Data entry of valuation details c) Data entry of legacy
encumbrance data d) Scanning & preservation of old documents e)
Connectivity to SROs with revenue offices IV. Modern record rooms/land records management centres at tehsil/taluk/circle/block level V. Training & capacity building a) Training, workshops, etc. b) Strengthening of the Survey and Revenue training institutes
VI. Core GIS
a) Village index base maps from satellite imagery, for creating the core
GIS;
b) Integration of three layers of data: (i) Spatial data from aerial
photograph or high-resolution satellite imagery; (ii) Survey of India and
Forest Survey of India maps; and (iii) Cadastral maps from revenue
records.
VII. Legal changes a) Amendments to the Registration Act, 1908; b)
Amendments to the State Stamp Acts; c) Other legal changes; and d)
Model law for conclusive titling.
VIII. Programme management a) Programme Sanctioning & Monitoring
Committee in the DoLR; b) Core Technical Advisory Group in the DoLR
and the States/UTs c) Programme Management Unit (PMU) in the DoLR
and the
States/UTs d) Information, education and communication (IEC)
activities e) Evaluation
6.1 All the activities have been framed in the form of two kinds of ladders – primary
and secondary; the primary ladder covers activities leading to conclusive titling, and
the secondary ladder covers activities that merely strengthen the revenue
administration. It is proposed to give priority to the primary activities through
budgetary support. A diagrammatic depiction of the two kinds of ladders is provided
at Annexure VIII. The States/UTs shall be required to follow the activities in this
pattern and to carry out the process re-engineering involved. Fund releases to the
States/UTs will be conditional upon the States/UTs signing the MoU to this effect
with the DoLR.
6.2 In order to make the programme time-bound, it is proposed to take the district as
the unit for completion of all primary activities. In each State and UT, it is proposed to
begin with 1 or 2 districts, then to scale up to 3-4 districts per State/UT, and to cover
the entire country by the 12th Plan period. However, the States/UTs which wish to
complete the work earlier can do so. They can also go for a public-private
partnership (PPP) model in the non-sensitive districts.
6.3 The DoLR have commissioned a study for the North-Eastern (NE) States, to be
conducted by the Centre for Rural Studies, Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of
Administration (LBSNAA), Mussoorie, since the land revenue systems of the NE
States differ substantially from the rest of the country.
Expected outcomes of the NLRMP
7. The major focus of the programme would be on providing citizen services, as
outlined below. The long-term goal would be to usher in the system of conclusive
titles with title guarantee in the country. In addition, the data and the conclusive titles
would be linked to the development process, such as credit institutions, disaster
management, land acquisition and rehabilitation & resettlement, land use planning,
cropping pattern and food security, and other secondary data such as issue of
various certificates, etc.
Besides the citizen and the govt., the conclusive titles and secondary data will be of
immense use to the private stakeholders.
7.1 Citizen services and benefits
i) Real-time records will be available to the citizen.
ii) Since the records will be placed on the websites with proper
security IDs, property owners will have free access to their
records while maintaining confidentiality.
iii) Free accessibility to the records will reduce interface between the
citizen and the Government functionaries, thereby reducing rent
seeking and harassment.
iv) Public-private partnership (PPP) mode of service delivery will
further reduce citizen interface with Govt. machinery, while
adding to the convenience.
v) Abolition of stamp papers and payment of stamp duty and
registration fees through banks, etc. will also reduce interface
with the Registration machinery.
vi) With the use of IT inter linkages, the time for obtaining RoRs, etc.
will be drastically reduced.
vii) The single-window service or
the web-enabled
“anytime-
anywhere” access will save the citizen time and effort in
obtaining RoRs, etc.
viii) Automatic and automated mutations will significantly reduce the
scope of fraudulent property deals.
Page 11 of 30
ix) Conclusive titling will also significantly reduce litigation.
x) These records will be tamper-proof.
xi) This method will permit e-linkages to credit facilities.
xii) Market value information will be available on the website to the
citizen. xiii) Certificates based on land data (e.g.,
domicile, caste, income, etc.) will be available to the
citizen through computers. xiv) Information on eligibility
for Government programmes will be available, based on
the data. xv) Issuance of land passbooks with relevant
information will be facilitated.
8. Approved funding pattern (a) 100% Central funding for computerization of land records including data entry/re-entry/data conversion, digitization of cadastral maps and integration of textual and spatial data, tehsil/sub-division/district data centres, States/UT-level data centres, inter-connectivity among the revenue offices, training and capacity building including strengthening of the revenue and survey training institutions, village index base maps and core GIS, legal changes and programme management; (b) 50:50 cost-sharing between the Centre and the States for survey/resurvey and updating of survey and settlement records including ground control network and ground truthing, and modern record rooms/land records management centres at the tehsil/taluka/circle/block level; (c) 25:75 cost-sharing between the Centre and the States for computerization of registration, scanning and preservation of legacy mutation records, and providing connectivity to the sub-registrars’ offices with the revenue offices; and (d) For the UTs, 100% Central funding for the NLRMP. Annexure-I List of activities covered under the Scheme of Strengthening of Revenue Administration & Updating of Land Records( SRA & ULR)
Sl. No.
Activities covered Status of the activities under NLRMP
1 Construction of Buildings :This includes construction/ extension of Training Institutes, Hostels for these institutes, Patwarghars and Record Rooms.
Only construction of record rooms/land resource management centres at tehsil level included.
2 Transport :This includes purchase of vehicles for Training Institutes and for movement of surveyequipments
Not covered
3 Furniture :Purchase of furniture for newly opened offices of Revenue Inspectors, furniture for Committee Rooms and Library Halls, for training institutes, for dormitories and mess.
Not covered
4 Survey/ purchase of modern Survey Equipment :This includes purchase of modern survey instrument like Global Positioning System (GPS), Total Stations, EDM, theodolite, workstation, aerial survey etc. for survey operations as well as for Training Institutions for training of the survey and settlement staff.
Covered
5 Maps / Storage facilities:This includes equipments for preparation of maps, steel almirahs for protection of maps and records, containers for records such as
Only compactor/map filing cabinet covered
map-filing cabinets, racks, bags etc.
6 Digitisation :This includes equipments for digitisation of survey-records and land holdings. Covered
7 Miscellaneous items :These include micro-filming/scanning of records/ maps, photo-copiers, laminating machines, binding machines, Risographs, Fax machines and setting up of computer cells.
Not covered
Page 14 of 30
PHYSICAL PROGRESS SINCE 10TH
PLAN UNDER THE CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEME OF STRENGTHENING OF REVENUE
ADMINISTRATION AND UPDATING OF LAND RECORDS (SRA & ULR)
2007-08
S.No. State Funds sanctioned No. of Survey/resurvey Purcha including State
share Record (No. of Districts) survey
(Rs. in crore) Rooms (Rs Andhra Pr. 15.40 308 Assam 6.52 1 (Kamrup) Bihar 3.55 1 (Nalanda) Chhattisgarh 15.65 1(Durg &Abhujmar area) Gujarat 21.44 1 (Jamnagar) Goa 1.11 Himachal 4.29 1 (Sirmour) Prd. 8 J&K 1.30 13
9 Karnataka 25.98 10 1 (Belgaum)
10 Kerala 9.50 20 1(Thiruvananthapuram)
11 Madhya Pr. 20.31 110 1(Sehore)
12 Maharashtra 1.72 1 (Pune)
13 Orissa 14.01 167 1 (Ganjam)
14 Rajasthan 11.26 8 1(Tonk)
15 Sikkim 0.80 4
16 Tamil Nadu 3.90 1 (Coimbatore)
17 Tripura 10.61 31
18 Uttar Pradesh 14.42 15 1 (Lakhimpur Keri)
19 West Bengal 22.36 2 (South & North 24 Paraganas)
20 D & N Haveli 0.70 Resurvey work
21 Lakshdweep 0.053 1
22 Puducherry 0.41 10
TOTAL 205.293 697 15
Page 16 of 30 ITEMS SANCTIONED UNDER THE CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEME OF
STRENGTHENING OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION AND UPDATING OF LAND RECORDS (SRA & ULR)
2006-07
S.No. State Funds sanctioned including
State share (Rs. in crore)
No. of Record Rooms
No. of office cum residence of Patwaris / Talathis/RIs
Constructio n of Tehsil Kacharies
Purchase of modern survey
equipment /survey (Rs. in
crore)
Cotii
Assam 2.06 1 16 Bihar 14.48 14 300 Chhattisgarh 10.00 500 Gujarat 2.25 4 1.30
Haryana 8.32 416 Kerala 1.52 38
Madhya Pr. 4.40 10 100 Maharashtra 13.47 225 4.20
Mizoram 6.08 4.44 (survey of Aizawl District)
Meghalaya 0.48 0.48 Nagaland 0.46 Base map survey Orissa 9.35 100 63 2 Tripura 0.96 6 0.66 Uttar
Pradesh 15.54
Uttarakhand 7.60 131 D& N Haveli 0.50 0.50 (resurvey)
TOTAL 97.47 163 1455 306 11.58 Page 17 of 30
ITEMS SANCTIONED UNDER THE CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEME OFSTRENGTHENING OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION
AND UPDATING OF LAND RECORDS (SRA & ULR)
2005-06
S.No. State Funds No. of No. of office Purchase of Constru sanctioned Record cum residence modern survey ovation including Rooms of Patwaris/ equipment training State share Talathis/RIs /survey (Rs. in institutio (Rs. in crore) crore) includin Goa 7.88 7.88 (resurvey)
Haryana 1.22
38
Jharkhand 5.00
0.25 1
Kerala 3.68
3.00
Madhya Pr. 4.46 7 58
Maharashtra 10.90 40 100 3.00
Mizoram 7.50
4.22( survey of
Aizawl District)
Nagaland 5.47 5.47 (resurvey
&
settlement of district Hqrs. & basemap
survey)
Rajasthan 12.00
100 1.00
Tamil Nadu 4.00 4.00 (resurvey) Uttar 12.48 5 Pradesh
Uttarakhand 3.39 1 D& N Haveli 0.50 0.50 (resurvey) TOTAL 78.48 47 296 29.32 7 Page 18 of 30
ITEMS SANCTIONED UNDER THE CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEME OF STRENGTHENING OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION AND UPDATING OF LAND RECORDS (SRA & ULR)
2004-05
S.No. State Funds sanctioned including
State share (Rs. in crore)
No. of Record Rooms
No. of office cum residence of Patwaris/ Talathis/RIs
Purchase of modern survey
equipment/su rvey (Rs. in
crore)
Constructioovation otraining
institutioincluding ho
Chhattisgarh 2.05 10 30 1.00 (Aerial survey of Abhujmar
area)
Gujarat 2.25 6 1.75
Haryana 0.40
Kerala 2.48 2.48 Madhya Pr. 10.69 17 40 3
Maharashtra 10.56 30 100 2.64 2 Mizoram 5.14 3.34 ( survey
of Aizawl District)
Nagaland 1.74 1.74 ( base map survey &
creation of RoR)
Punjab 3.54
TOTAL 38.85 57 176 12.95 5 Page 19 of 30
ITEMS SANCTIONED UNDER THE CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEME OF STRENGTHENING OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION AND UPDATING OF LAND RECORDS (SRA & ULR)
2003-04
S.No. State Funds sanctioned
No. of Record Rooms
No. of office cum residence
Construction of
Purchasemodern
including State share
(Rs. in crore)
of Patwaris/ Talahis/RIs
Tehsil Kacharies
surveyequipme/survey (R
in crore Andhra Pr. 15.00 26 2.70
Assam 1.25
Gujarat 1.85 1.00 (modsurvey
equipmentsurvey wo
of Surendrana
district) Haryana 0.20 Karnataka 1.00
Kerala 5.30 55 3.00 Maharashtra 13.00 41 100 3.88 Mizoram 1.64 1.64 ( surv of Aizaw District) Nagaland 4.95 1.30
Page 20 of 30
Punjab 1.12
Tamil Nadu 1.03 0.80
Tripura 1.98 24 0.07
Lakshadwee p
0.053 1
TOTAL 48.373 123 100 24 14.39
Page 21 of 30 ITEMS SANCTIONED UNDER THE CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEME OF
STRENGTHENING OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION AND UPDATING OF LAND RECORDS (SRA & ULR)
2002-03
S.No. State Funds No. of No. of office Constructio Purchase of sanctioned
including State Record Rooms
cum residence of Patwaris/
n of Tehsil modern survequipment/su
share (Rs. in crore)
Talathis/RIs Kacharies vey (Rs. in crore)
Chhattisgarh 1.30 1.30 (Aerial photography of Raigarh & Jaishdistricts)
Goa 1.20 1.20 (revisionsurvey)
Haryana 0.80
Himachal 0.06 Pradesh J&K 2.30 33 1.20 Karnataka 0.30
Kerala 3.70
Madhya Pr. 4.96 20 10 Maharashtra 8.75 30 100 1.00 Mizoram 3.00 1.50 (Summa
survey and record
preparation) Page 22 of 30
Nagaland 2.13 2.13(base msurvey andcreation of
RoR) Punjab 1.00 1 Tamil Nadu 0.40
Tripura 3.71 18
West Bengal 7.84 152 0.55
TOTAL 41.45 203 143 18 8.88
Total 10th Plan 304.623 593 2170 348 77.12 11th Plan (07-08) 205.293 697 8.65
Grand total 509.916 1290 2170 348 85.77
Page 23 of 30
ANNEXURE IV
List of activities for which financial assistance is provided to the States/UTsunder the Scheme of Computerization of Land Records (CLR).
Sl.No. Activities covered Status of the activities under the NLRMP
1. Undertaking data entry work Covered 2. Setting up of computer centres at the
taluk/tehsil/block/circle level, and sub-divisional level
Covered
3. Imparting training on computer awareness and application software to revenue officials for regular updating of records of rights and smooth operation of computer centres
Covered
4. District Land Records Data Centres Covered 5. Setting up of Monitoring Cell at State
Headquarter Covered
6. Digitization of cadastral maps Covered
Page 24 of 30
ANNEXURE-VII
Status of Computerization of Land Records in the States/UTs
A. States/UTs which have completed the RoR data entry:
Chhattisgarh, Goa, Gujarat, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan,
Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and West Bengal, and NCT of Delhi
B. States/UTs where RoR data entry likely to be completed soon:
Assam, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa, Tripura, and UT of Puducherry
C. States/UTs where RoR data entry begun but not completed:
Arunachal Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Kerala, Manipur, Mizoram, and Nagaland, and
UTs of Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, and Daman & Diu
D. States/UTs still at preparatory stage:
J&K, Punjab, and Meghalaya and UTs of Chandigarh, and Lakshadweep
E. States/UTs which have stopped manual issue of RoRs: Gujarat, Karnataka, Madhya
Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal
F. States/UTs which have placed RoR data on websites:
Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, and Uttarakhand
G. States/UTs which have received funds for digitization of cadastral maps:
Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh,Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Manipur, Orissa, Punjab,Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and West Bengal, and UT ofPuducherry
Page 27 of 30 ANNEXURE – VIII
The Primary & Secondary Ladders proposed under NLRMP
Ladder-like approach
� Primary ladder – for conclusive titles � Secondary ladder – for archival purposesand strengthening of revenue administration
Page 28 of 30
Primary Ladder: approach 1
• Registration • Training and strengthening of computerization of SROs
training institutions
Integration of registration • Strengthening of
and land records
maintenance systems technical organizations
• Record rooms at
• Automatic mutation Registration/ tehsil
following registration levels Mutation – updating of • Link up withpending cases and their development process computerization • Legal changes Integration of textual and • Conclusive titles spatial data Survey, including ground control networks and ground truthing
Primary Ladder: approach 2
• Survey, including ground • Training and control networks and
strengthening of
ground truthing training institutions
• Strengthening of
• Mutation – updating of technical organizations
pending cases and their
computerization • Record rooms at
Registration/ tehsil Integration of textual and levels
spatial data • Link up with
Registration development process computerization of SROs • Legal changes Integration of registration • Conclusive titles and land records maintenance systems Automatic mutation following registration
Page 29 of 30
Secondary Ladder
Computerization of existing records Scanning of existing survey maps Computerization of legacy mutation data Record rooms Page 30 of 30
Recommended