View
32
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
National Food Policy Plan of Action and Country Investment Plan Monitoring Report 2012 An overview by Ciro Fiorillo, CTA NFPCSP August 13 th 2012 . National Food Policy Capacity Strengthening Programme. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
National Food Policy Capacity Strengthening Programme
National Food Policy Plan of Action and Country Investment Plan
Monitoring Report 2012
An overviewby Ciro Fiorillo, CTA NFPCSP
August 13th 2012
Bangladesh has been an early adopter of the comprehensive approach to food security through the formulation of the National Food Policy (2006) and its Plan of Action (2008)
The framework for food security interventions: the National Food Policy and its Plan of Action
The National Food Policy Plan of Action provides a comprehensive long-term (2008-2015) framework for:
- Coordinating government interventions on food security
- Aligning development support to national priorities in line with the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
- Regularly monitoring progress toward food security in line with MDG1
-Identifying needs for investments
To reduce undernourishment, stunting and underweight, food should be available, accessible and complemented by nutrition interventions
Access NutritionAvailability
Responding to L’Aquila Initiative and in line with the 5 Principles agreed in the Rome Food Summit, the CIP was approved in 2010 and revised in 2011 based on extensive consultations. It is a coherent set of 12 strategic priority investment programmes allowing to coordinate Government and Development partners interventions It is aligned with MDG1, NFP PoA and the Sixth Five Year PlanIt focuses on investments included in the Annual Development Budget
The framework for food security interventions: The Country Investment Plan
The CIP and PoA provide the framework for monitoring impacts, outputs and financial commitments
Monitoring the CIP and NFP PoA A complex exercise involving multiple:- agencies from government and development partners - Levels of monitoring and types of information
CIP Results Chain
NFP Global Objectiveto ensure sustained
food security for all people of the country
at all times
OUTPUTS IMPACTS/OUTCOMES
3 CIP components
INPUTS/ACTION LEVEL
NFP PoA results chain
12 CIP programmes
GoB / donor financial
commitments to ongoing (≈ 269) and pipeline (≈ 130) projects
40 priority investment
area
Sub-outputs Aggregate outputs
300 action/ strategic
actions lines
26 PoA Areas of Intervention
3 NFP Objectives
National Food Policy – progress toward the goalOverall goals of the NFP is “to ensure dependable sustained food
security for all people of the country at all times” In the CIP, 3 indicators focus on nutrition as food security outcome: Target at reach for underweight and stunting, acceleration needed
for undernourishment (for which limited data are available)
SFYP indicator and NFP goal
2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Target 2015 Source
Undernourishment 26.8%(2005-7)
26.3%(2006-8)
25.8%(2007-9) na 19%
(MDG -1)FAOSOFI
Prevalence of underweight children (0 to 59 months - WHO standards)
41% na na 36% 33%(MDG -1) BDHS
Stunting (0 -59 months) 43% na na 41%
38%(revised
HPNSDP target for 2016)
BDHS
CIP indicators included in the Sixth Five Year Plan In addition to underweight, 4 indicators from the CIP and PoA
were included in the Development Result Framework of the SFYP to measure progress on poverty and food security
Progress against targets is satisfactorySFYP indicator and NFP
goal2007/08
(PoA baseline)
2008/09 2009/10(CIP/SFYP baseline)
2010/11 Target 2011
Target 2015
Source
Poverty headcount index (CBN upper poverty line)
40.1%(2005) na 31.5%
(2010) na 29.7% 29% (MDG1) BBS
Rate of growth of agricultural GDP in constant prices
3.00% 3.97% 5.24% 5.24% 5.0% 4.3% BBS
Government spending on social protection as % of GDP
Na 2.25% 2.52% 2.64% (revised) 2.0% 3.0% MoF
Growth of wages in kg of rice (3-year moving average)
-8.11% -1.38% 5.71% 7.73% 7.16%≥ GDP growth
+ 0.5
BBS and
DAM
CIP programme
CIP budget 2011 Revised (data up to June 2010) CIP budget 2012 (data up to June 2011)
Total CIP
Financed (ongoing or completed)
Pipeline projects
Total CIP
Financed (ongoing or completed)
Pipeline projects
GOB DPs Total Total Priority GOB DPs Total Total Priority
A = D+E B C D E F A = D+E B C D E F
Availability
4,175
706
580
1,286
2,889
1,889
5,115
1,829
664
2,493
2,622
1,924
Access
3,241
860
878
1,738
1,502
993
3,555
1,392
1,012
2,405
1,151
695
Utilization
778
8
33
41
737
584
471
66
272
338
133
100
Total
8,194
1,574
1,491
3,065
5,128
3,465 9,141
3,287
1,948
5,235
3,906
2,719
CIP financial commitments (CIP table 4.1)Variations in CIP Budget between June 2010 and June 2011Total value of the CIP has increased by US$ 947 million (+11.6%) Financed CIP project increased by US$ M 2,170 (+71%)
of which US$ 1,713 by GoB (+109%) and US$ 457 by DPs (+31%)Pipeline decreased by US$ M 1,222 (-24%) due to:
- Projects whose implementation started (e.g. NNS: US$M 115)- Possible under-reporting of projects in pipelines
CIP delivery and financing progress in 2010/11- Delivery stands at US$ M 836 (this is CIP execution in FY 2011)- Additional financing US$ M 2,170 (US$M 1,861 for new projects)- Additional financing larger than delivery, especially for availability
- Develop capacity to deliver - Scale up identification & financing in areas lagging
behind
Availability Access Utilization -
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200 Delivery
DPsGoB
mill
ion
USD
Availability Access Utilization -
300
600
900
1,200 Financing for new projects
DPsGoB
mill
ion
USD
• Agricultural GDP growth (5.24%) is above the target for 2011 • Variability of rice production remained low• Rice import dependency slightly increased due to public imports for stabilizing
domestic supply and price• Increased share of rice on total food VA: no progress in diversification
Indicator 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 TargetRate of growth of agricultural GDP (in constant prices) 3.00% 3.97% 5.24% 5.24% 5%
Instability of rice production(de-trended 10 y coeff. of variation) 4.09% 3.69% 4.07% 3.38% na
Rice import dependency (3-year moving average) 2.40% 4.30% 1.40% 2.50% 0%
Share of rice value added in total food value added in current price 41.5% 43.1% 42.2% 42.9%p na
NFP Objective 1: Availability of food
Scale up fisheries, livestock and horticulture investments to promote diversification Foster research and extension for climate change adaptation Valorize unused land in costal areas Promote use efficiency and quality of agrochemicals Promote water use efficiency and preserve water table
• Poverty rate declined steeply – and the average poor person is less poor• Real wages increased significantly (in rice terms)• Food prices have risen faster than other prices, trend reverted in2012
NFP Objective 2: Access to food
Indicator 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Target Source
Moderate poverty (CBN upper line)
40% (2005) na na 31.50%
(2010)29%
(MDG1) BBS
Extreme poverty (CBN lower line)
25.1%(2005) na na 17.6%
(2010) na BBS
Poverty gap (CBN upper line)
9.0% (2005) na. na 6.5%
(2010)8%
(MDG1) BBS
Change in wages in kg of rice (3-y moving av.) -8.11% -1.38% 5.71% 7.73% 7.16% BBS and
DAM
Inflation differential between food and
general CPI5.1%
(av. 2005-08)6.3%
(av. 2006-09)7.6%
(av. 2007-10)9.1%
(av. 2008-11) 0% BBS
Expand storage capacity; integrate procurement, distribution and trade policies Sustain attention to climate change, access to natural resources, price volatility Continue regular monitoring of food security Finalize the national social protection strategy based on broad based consultations
• Diversification: low in production, improved in consumption (but still > 60% )• Good improvement in CED of women (health intervention impacts) • Children receiving acceptable diet reduced (new WHO definition in 2010/11)• Consuming of iodized salt reduced (higher standards, informal imports)
NFP Objective 3: Food utilisation for nutrition
Indicator 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Target
Nat. Dietary Energy Supply from cereals 78.1% (2005-07) na na na 60%
National Dietary Energy Intake from cereals 73% na 70% 60%
Chronic Energy Deficiency among women (BMI <18.5)
38%(2004)
32% (2005)
33%(2007)
25% (2010)
20%by 2015
% of children receiving minimum acceptable diet (6-23 months) 42% 34% 38% 21% 52% by
2016
Households consuming iodized salt na 91.8%% 92% 84% 100%
Increase dietary diversification & Promote food fortification Strengthen community based nutrition Improve institutional setup for multi-sectoral coordination Develop food safety and quality control and enforce existing legislation Assure water and sanitation, especially in urban areas and during disasters
Thank You
For comments and suggestions please e-mail: ciro.fiorillo@fao.org dgfpmu@fd.gov.bd
Recommended